LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY E-learning strategic statement 2005-2010 UCL encourages staff to adopt a reflective, experimental and innovatory approach to their teaching. New technologies provide an important range of opportunities for this. The e-learning strategic statement reflects this forward looking spirit. Purpose of this document 1. To supplement the UCL Institutional Learning and Teaching strategy, and to present a set of aims for the development of e-learning at UCL; 2. To outline the opportunities and challenges presented by e-learning, and its future role in supporting the delivery and enhancement of learning and teaching at UCL; 3. To guide investment in e-learning; 4. To present an implementation plan to underpin the support of effective and appropriate use of e-learning across UCL. Background 5. In 2000, Academic Committee established a Working Party on Distance Learning under the chairmanship of Professor Stan Newman. The Working Party’s report emphasises the importance of “capacity building” in departments: namely the development of appropriate expertise among teachers for the new IT-based technologies to be used for distance learning. 6. Many of the issues highlighted by this working party remain the same today though our understanding has advanced considerably through our experience with WebCT. 7. The UCL Institutional Learning and Teaching Strategy (ILTS) (2005-2010) called for development of a UCL e-learning statement that supplements and supports the ILTS. An E-learning Forum was convened in September 2004 to consider UCL’s priorities e-learning, and e-learning working groups were established to take forward the development of the statement. 8. This statement has been developed following consultation with and surveys of academic and support staff, and taking into account the preliminary work of the working groups. UCL E-learning Strategic Statement 1 Definition of e-learning 9. For the purposes of this statement, e-learning is defined as ‘learning facilitated and supported through the use of information and communications technology (ICT)’. It involves, for example: provision of teaching materials and activities online; on-line assessment; tools for student-student and student-teacher communications; use of Internet resources; and other learning activities involving IT and the Internet. 10. E-learning should not be regarded as a separate form of learning; it must be integrated with wider curriculum planning and informed by the principles of good teaching and learning. 11. It encompasses activities across a broad spectrum, from the improved provision of support for learners through the blending of traditional and online learning (which characterises most of the e-learning activities at UCL) to learning that is delivered entirely online. Guiding principles The principles underlying the aims presented in this document are that: 12. E-learning can enhance the learning experience for students by providing flexibility, more interactive and constructive learning, new interdisciplinary and international approaches, and new opportunities for preparing for classroom activities and for reinforcing learning. 13. Educational rather than technical considerations will guide the use of e-learning, and desired learning outcomes will determine the appropriate choice of technology. 14. E-learning provision is an element of UCL’s competitive edge because students increasingly expect e-learning to be a standard feature of their educational experiences. 15. If it is to continue to provide the progressive, high quality learning experience commensurate with its position as a global university, UCL must take advantage of the opportunities offered and address the challenges posed by e-learning. Aims 16. To include e-learning in the portfolio of pedagogical tools at UCL, to be deployed wherever its advantages can be realised; 17. To raise staff awareness of e-learning and the range of e-learning tools available at UCL, and to equip them with the technical and pedagogical skills to use them effectively and appropriately in their teaching; 18. To provide and facilitate ongoing support for staff, students and faculties/departments in their use of e-learning; 19. To use e-learning to foster a culture of innovation, experimentation and reflection on teaching and learning across UCL; 20. To seek out good practice in the use of e-learning, both inside and outside UCL and to disseminate it across UCL; 21. To provide an appropriate infrastructure for the development and use of elearning systems and tools. UCL E-learning Strategic Statement 2 Opportunities offered by e-learning Experienced UCL staff have identified a wide range of potential benefits which can be attributed to e-learning. 22. Pedagogic benefits: Many aspects of UCL’s Learning and Teaching Strategy can be supported by e-learning provision, and in some cases e-learning may be the only realistic approach. a. Internationalisation – the effective exploitation of the internet as an integral part of the UCL experience will be vital for the achievement of the aspirations in this strand. It will allow international experts to contribute to courses; staff and students can communicate and collaborate with those in foreign institutions; and the technology will support UCL students studying abroad. b. Curriculum – e-learning tools offer opportunities for more flexible curricula, innovative learning experiences, improved interdisciplinary working, and the development of autonomous learning skills. c. Assessment – technology can not only facilitate the development of more effective summative assessment tools, such as the use of eportfolios, but can also simplify learning-oriented and diagnostic assessment. d. Employability – IT skills are increasingly important in today’s job market. The embedded use of IT will ensure that these skills are developed as part of the UCL experience. e. Learning support – IT-based tools can improve opportunities for student-tutor and student-student interaction, as well as stimulating student reflection and learner independence. E-learning can also offer conduits to digital learning resources (online journals, library catalogues, simulations, digitised museum objects, etc.) thereby enriching the learning process. f. Innovation – E-learning tools can be extremely effective in encouraging and supporting pedagogical innovation. By changing and challenging traditional roles and techniques, they shine a bright light on current practice and promote reflection and experimentation. In this way, elearning can act as a catalyst for staff training and development. g. Widening participation – the flexibility to deliver learning experiences ‘any place, any time’ will allow more non-traditional students (such as part-time students or those with family responsibilities, etc.) to follow UCL courses. Assistive technologies can also improve access to students with disabilities. 23. Administrative benefits: these include greater flexibility in course organisation, the dissemination of teaching materials and the ability to track student activity (such as tasks attempted, the time taken, the use of help, etc.). 24. Efficiency: in the longer term, the use of technology could lead to the more effective use of classroom space, the re-use of digital teaching materials, and the freeing-up of tutor time. However, e-learning is unlikely to save money in the short to medium term, given the other costs associated with such provision. UCL E-learning Strategic Statement 3 Challenges of e-learning For these benefits to be fully realised, the following challenges raised by e-learning need to be recognised and addressed. 25. Pedagogic challenges: new pedagogic skills will be required in course and curriculum design (e.g. the creation of suitable content, use of appropriate activities); in the facilitation of learning on a day-to-day basis (e.g. online tutoring, managing autonomous learning, the use of formative feedback, etc.); and in integrating e-learning with face-to-face provision. In addition, staff will need skills in the development of suitably valid and reliable assessment methods for use in e-learning environments. UCL as a whole will need to develop its own approach to e-learning pedagogy, drawing on examples of best practice from inside and outside UCL, and develop appropriate quality assurance procedures. 26. Staff training and support challenges: Staff will need to be persuaded of the benefits of e-learning and mechanisms found to provide high quality training and support to busy academics. This will be essential if e-learning is to be fully embedded into the teaching and learning repertoire of UCL staff. Both innovation and the adoption of best practice need to be encouraged and recognised. 27. Technical challenges: educational technology continues to advance very rapidly, and it will be a major challenge to provide a reliable e-learning infrastructure with the flexibility to incorporate new tools quickly and to support innovation. To keep pace with user expectations, it will also need to support a wide variety of media (audio, video, animations, etc.) with access from any platform, at any time, from anywhere, and by an increasing number of users. Compliance with accessibility requirements will be mandatory. 28. Financial challenges: although e-learning could save money and staff time in the longer term, investment is needed in the transition to teaching and learning that makes best use of the advantages presented by new technologies and pedagogies. While keeping these costs to a minimum is desirable, underinvestment carries its own risks. Funding is needed for staff training and support; for the development and maintenance of the technical infrastructure; and for encouraging the innovative deployment of e-learning approaches. 29. Other challenges: e-learning has other implications across the organisation. For example, further policies will need to be developed on copyright (in regard to both the ownership of materials produced by UCL staff, and the use of third party materials). This will require the investigation of new models of copyright (e.g., Creative Commons) and their relevance to UCL. In addition, the various elements and technologies involved in e-learning require close collaboration among staff with a variety of skills and blur the boundaries between technical, academic and administrative activities. Implementation plan – see Appendix 1 Risk assessment – see Appendix 2 Ownership and review 30. The Director of EISD is responsible to the Vice-Provost (Academic and International) for the development and implementation of this Statement. This Statement will be reviewed by AC every three years and monitored annually by Academic Committee's Executive Sub-Committee on Innovations in Learning, Teaching and Assessment (ESCILTA). UCL E-learning Strategic Statement 4 Appendix 1: Implementation Plan Objective Target date Responsibility (primary first) 1 To embed e-learning as a standard pedagogical tool at UCL a To develop a ‘UCL e-learning pedagogy’ in the UCL tradition as an excellent provider of quality faceto-face education, which takes account of best practice from both inside and outside UCL, and makes best use of the opportunities afforded by e-learning. Sept 2008 EISD b. Consider the opportunities offered by e-learning, with the explicit inclusion of e-learning in departmental and faculty planning and strategy documents. Sept 2008 Faculties, Departments c. Use a standardised web-based approach to enhance course management and student support through provision of course handbooks, core reading lists, timetables, assessment dates and staff contact information etc. for all courses, even where there is no explicit e-learning component in the course. All courses by Sept 2008 Departments, Library Services d. Review existing quality assurance procedures, including the annual course review and monitoring process (Internal Quality Review) and adapt them to include e-learning where necessary. Ongoing Academic Services, Registry, EISD 2 To raise staff awareness of e-learning and the range of e-learning tools available at UCL, and to equip them with the technical and pedagogical skills to use them effectively and appropriately in their teaching; a. Include e-learning in the new lecturer’s programme (CLTHE) run by CALT. Ongoing EISD b. Provide programmes of training in the use of specific technologies. Ongoing EISD c. Provide training, support and advice in effective pedagogic practice for e-learning. Ongoing EISD d. Promote the use of e-learning tools via workshops, open days, attendance at faculty awaydays, etc. Ongoing EISD 3 To provide and facilitate ongoing support for staff, students and faculties/departments in their use of e-learning; a. Develop and make available supporting materials and resources for both staff and students (technical and pedagogical documentation, scenarios, case studies, course templates etc.) Ongoing EISD UCL E-learning Strategic Statement 5 b. Encourage guest access to on-line courses in order to promote good practice and the sharing of ideas. c. Provide funding to ‘buy in’ support (e.g. external developers, Media Resources, postgraduates) for material/activity development. d. Deliver supplementary learning and training in core skills such as IT and information literacy to all students via e-learning, in preparation for academic study at higher levels and for the world of employment. Ongoing Library Services, EISD e. Provide staff with support in integrating digitised licensed materials into e-learning modules. Ongoing Library Services f. Include e-learning responsibilities in the definition of relevant staff roles, especially for new lecturers. Sept 2006 Heads of Depts g. Address the medium term issue of resource and time investment needed for academic staff to develop e-learning skills and to create appropriate learning materials and activities. Sept 2006 SMT/HR h. Provide ongoing funding to provide high quality support and training for e-learning across UCL. July 2006 SMT 4 To use e-learning to foster a culture of innovation, experimentation and reflection in teaching and learning across UCL a. Facilitate and maintain communities of practice that will share ideas and build innovations in learning and e-learning (both discipline-based and inter-disciplinary). Ongoing EISD b. Provide pump-priming funding for innovative uses of e-learning (ESCILTA grants). Ongoing ESCILTA c. Support small-scale and fast return e-learning pilots (support provided by the LTSS and CALT). Ongoing EISD d. Embed evaluation, reflection and dissemination of results in the planning of pilot studies. Ongoing EISD e. Increase the use of secondments to support exploratory e-learning projects. Ongoing EISD 5 To seek out good practice in the use of e-learning, both inside and outside UCL and to disseminate it across UCL a. Provide funding for EISD e-learning support staff to attend e-learning conferences and workshops to identify trends and keep abreast of technical and pedagogical developments Ongoing EISD b. Contribute submissions on e-learning activities to the biennial UCL Teaching and Learning conferences. March 2006, then ongoing EISD c. Instigate a series of seminars and workshops on specific e-learning topics, led by central staff, UCL January 2006 EISD UCL E-learning Strategic Statement 6 Ongoing EISD, individual staff ESCILTA academics or external contributors d. Identify and support individual academics as ‘champions’ to monitor and pioneer e-learning in all departments/disciplines May 2006, then ongoing EISD, Faculties, Departments e. Develop and support inter-institutional collaborations in the development of material (e.g. Sheffield/UCL’s development of DVDs) Ongoing EISD f. Encourage individuals and groups to disseminate information on their e-learning activities across UCL and academia in general, e.g. via workshops, websites or weblogs, etc. Ongoing EISD 6 To provide an appropriate infrastructure for the development and use of e-learning systems and tools a. Provide easy access to the virtual learning environment and other e-learning tools for both staff and students. Ongoing EISD b. Keep abreast of developments in e-learning technologies and introduce an effective evaluation methodology which considers ease of use, pedagogic value and total cost of ownership. Ongoing EISD c. Provide a test-bed environment in which new learning technologies can be investigated, tested and developed separately from the production environment, thereby ensuring that UCL keeps abreast of developments in e-learning systems and tools without compromising the stability of the existing system. Sept 2006 EISD d. Keep abreast of and participate in relevant standards arenas (IMS, reusability, e-portfolios, etc.). Ongoing EISD e. Establish a ‘one-stop-shop’ for e-learning support and enquiries. f. Identify and, where possible, remove technical barriers to the take-up of e-learning. Ongoing EISD g. Ensure sufficient funding for the development and maintenance of the e-learning infrastructure. July 2006 SMT UCL E-learning Strategic Statement EISD, Library Services, Registry 7 Appendix 2 - Risk assessment Nature of Risk 1. Insufficient funds or space provided for adequate numbers of training and support staff Likelihood of risk (high/med/low) Impact level (high/med/low) Medium/high High Potential result Adverse impact on UCL learning and teaching quality. E-learning does not become embedded in UCL T&L practice. How the risk will be UCL officers minimised (current responsible actions/processes/activities) Budget allocation for elearning support staff. SMT Provide additional space. Detrimental effect on UCL’s reputation. Potential loss of revenue. 2. 3. Demands for support outstrip central services’ ability to respond effectively Medium Quality of UCL e-learning provision fails to reach accepted standards Medium High Staff frustration. Adverse impact on UCL learning and teaching quality. High Loss of reputation for UCL. Support demands monitored. Methods to ameliorate demand investigated (website, FAQs, self-help). Director of EISD Comprehensive e-learning QA process in place in IQR , Programme Development procedures etc. VP Academic and International Numbers of staff attending courses etc. recorded and closely monitored. Director of EISD Potential loss of revenue. 4. Insufficient staff take-up of training opportunities offered UCL E-learning Strategic Statement Medium High E-learning does not become embedded in UCL T&L practice. 8 Procedures for marketing of training provision kept under review. Nature of Risk 5. 6. 7. 8. Insufficient pump priming funding for e-learning activities Likelihood of risk (high/med/low) Impact level (high/med/low) Medium Medium Potential result Innovative uses of elearning not trialled/evaluated Failure of UCL to keep abreast of Medium new technical and pedagogical developments in e-learning Medium Insufficient central funding for the Low development and support of an appropriate technical infrastructure for e-learning High Low High Inadequate quality of e-learning training UCL E-learning Strategic Statement UCL falls behind in quality of e-learning provision. Ineffective use of elearning investment. Adverse impact on UCL learning and teaching quality. Loss of reputation. Loss of revenue. Staff don’t come to sessions. Staff leave without sufficient skills. Loss of reputation for providers 9 How the risk will be UCL officers minimised (current responsible actions/processes/activities) Monitoring of e-learning projects undertaken with ESCILTA grants, and under CALT secondments. Chair of ESCILTA Individual EISD e-learning support staff attendance at conferences and workshops; dissemination of findings monitored. Director of EISD Budget allocation for elearning infrastructure. Chair of ISC Feedback sought after each session, and results acted on. Director of EISD Director of CALT Chair of HRPC