1
Table S2. Details of datasets included in meta-analysis
2
3
Plant species, pollinator mobility, life form and mating system information included in the meta-analysis (nfamilies,
4
total number of families per group; tm, multilocus outcrossing rate; tm-ts, biparental inbreeding estimate; rp, multilocus
5
correlated paternity; ± one standard deviation).
Forest or 'best on offer' group
Species
Pollinator
mobility
Life
form
Acacia anfractuosa
Non-mobile
Shrub
10
Banksia oligantha
Mobile
Shrub
10
Banksia sphaerocarpa var.
caesia
Mobile
Shrub
11
Calothamnus quadrifidus
Mobile
Shrub
20
Carapa guianensis
Non-mobile
Tree
21
Carapa guianensis
Non-mobile
Tree
20
Carapa procera
Non-mobile
Tree
33
nfamilies
Caryocar brasiliense
Mobile
Tree
14
Cavanillesia platanifolia
Mobile
Tree
20
Ceiba ausculifolia
Mobile
Tree
36
tm
0.89 ±
0.20
1.00 ±
0.20
0.99 ±
0.34
0.70 ±
0.22
0.94 ±
0.12
0.97 ±
0.10
0.85 ±
0.05
1.00 ±
0.00
0.57 ±
0.11
0.96 ±
0.27
tm-ts
0.01 ±
0.20
0.01 ±
0.20
0.04 ±
0.13
0.02 ±
0.09
0.02 ±
0.07
rp
0.15 ±
0.20
0.09 ±
0.20
0.33 ±
0.10
0.27 ±
0.27
0.05 ±
0.06
Fragmented group
nfamilies
10
10
10
20
21
20
0.11 ±
0.02
0.21 ±
0.03
14
0.19 ±
0.19
10
11
31
tm
0.85 ±
0.20
0.98 ±
0.20
0.91 ±
0.04
0.54 ±
0.45
0.93 ±
0.15
0.99 ±
0.13
0.63 ±
0.08
1.00 ±
0.00
0.35 ±
0.08
0.97 ±
0.03
tm-ts
0.05 ±
0.20
0.03 ±
0.20
0.04 ±
0.19
0.01 ±
0.13
0.03 ±
0.08
rp
0.06 ±
0.20
0.03 ±
0.20
0.34 ±
0.10
0.08 ±
0.09
0.05 ±
0.06
Reference
(Coates et al, 2007)
(Coates et al, 2007)
(Llorens et al, 2011)
(Yates et al, 2007)
(Cloutier et al, 2007)
(Hall et al, 1994)
0.06 ±
0.02
0.23 ±
0.03
(Doligez and Joly, 1997)
0.17 ±
0.05
(Collevatti et al, 2001)
(Murawski and Hamrick,
1992)
(Quesada et al, 2004)
Ceiba grandiflora
Mobile
Tree
12
Dinizia excelsa
Mobile
Tree
14
Dipteryx panamensis
Mobile
Tree
31
Dryobalanops aromatica
Non-mobile
Tree
10
Dryobalanops aromatica
Non-mobile
Tree
10
Embotrium coccineum
Mobile
Tree
18
Enterolobium cyclocarpum
Mobile
Tree
20
Eucalyptus benthamii
Non-mobile
Tree
16
Eucalyptus globulus
(Tasmania)
Non-mobile
Tree
20
Eucalyptus globulus (Victoria)
Non-mobile
Tree
20
Eucalyptus gracilis
Non-mobile
Tree
20
Eucalyptus incrassata
Mobile
Tree
8
Eucalyptus marginata
Non-mobile
Tree
10
Eucalyptus rameliana
Mobile
Tree
10
Eucalyptus socialis
Non-mobile
Tree
16
Grevillea iaspicula
Mobile
Shrub
10
Hakea carinata
Non-mobile
Shrub
6
Helicteres brevispira
Mobile
Shrub
19
Lambertia orbifolia
Mobile
Shrub
10
Magnolia stellata
Non-mobile
Tree
20
0.90 ±
0.59
0.90 ±
0.08
0.93 ±
0.15
0.86 ±
0.34
0.92 ±
0.04
0.84 ±
0.34
1.00 ±
0.16
0.68 ±
0.05
0.89 ±
0.09
0.86 ±
0.14
0.98 ±
0.01
0.96 ±
0.07
0.80 ±
0.28
0.93 ±
0.20
0.84 ±
0.04
1.00 ±
0.05
0.12 ±
0.50
0.65 ±
0.05
0.65 ±
0.20
0.74 ±
0.55
18
6
0.03 ±
0.13
31
29
0.08 ±
0.03
0.08 ±
0.88
0.02 ±
0.10
0.17 ±
0.11
0.04 ±
0.06
0.06 ±
0.07
0.11 ±
0.02
0.08 ±
0.04
0.08 ±
0.06
0.05 ±
0.20
0.20 ±
0.03
0.04 ±
0.05
0.11 ±
0.06
0.18 ±
0.38
0.10 ±
0.16
0.43 ±
0.35
0.12 ±
0.09
0.20 ±
0.14
0.06 ±
0.01
0.10 ±
0.03
0.92 ±
0.32
0.11 ±
0.20
0.32 ±
0.10
0.44 ±
0.05
10
2
20
11
20
20
12
16
10
10
13
10
8
0.02 ±
0.02
0.05 ±
0.20
0.04 ±
0.66
22
0.11 ±
0.20
10
10
0.91 ±
0.04
0.86 ±
0.01
0.87 ±
0.18
0.79 ±
0.04
0.77 ±
0.06
0.73 ±
0.27
1.00 ±
0.25
0.50 ±
0.12
0.65 ±
0.21
0.79 ±
0.27
0.74 ±
0.08
0.94 ±
0.03
0.71 ±
0.35
0.51 ±
0.20
0.73 ±
0.09
0.96 ±
0.05
0.09 ±
0.50
0.49 ±
0.04
0.38 ±
0.20
0.62 ±
0.10
(Quesada et al, 2004)
(Dick et al, 2003)
0.06 ±
0.15
(Hanson et al, 2008)
(Hall et al, 1994)
0.04 ±
0.01
0.00 ±
0.16
0.02 ±
0.10
0.31 ±
0.30
0.06 ±
0.07
0.11 ±
0.09
0.16 ±
0.03
0.19 ±
0.03
0.14 ±
0.13
0.04 ±
0.20
0.23 ±
0.05
0.03 ±
0.05
0.39 ±
0.08
0.07 ±
0.51
0.19 ±
0.30
0.29 ±
0.11
0.06 ±
0.07
0.03 ±
0.05
0.32 ±
0.06
0.16 ±
0.03
0.78 ±
0.28
0.13 ±
0.20
0.13 ±
0.04
0.31 ±
0.05
(Lee, 2000)
(Mathiasen et al, 2007)
(Rocha and Aguilar, 2001)
(Butcher et al, 2005)
(Mimura et al, 2009)
(Mimura et al, 2009)
this study
this study
(Millar et al, 2000)
(Coates et al, 2007)
this study
(Hoebee and Young, 2001)
(Starr and Carthew, 1998)
0.02 ±
0.02
0.03 ±
0.20
0.08 ±
0.12
(Franceschinelli and Bawa,
2000)
0.12 ±
0.20
(Coates et al, 2007)
(Hirayama et al, 2007)
Magnolia stellata
Non-mobile
Tree
35
Myrtus communis
Non-mobile
Shrub
22
Pachira quinata
Mobile
Tree
15
Platypodium elegans
Tree
5
Prunus avium
Non-mobile
Tree
10
Psychotria tenuinervis
Non-mobile
Shrub
18
Samanea saman
Mobile
Tree
20
Senna miltijuga
Mobile
Tree
22
Shorea curtisii
Non-mobile
Tree
11
Shorea megistophylla
Mobile
Tree
8
Sorocea affinis
Non-mobile
Tree
7
Non-mobile
Tree
23
Non-mobile
Tree
24
Mobile
Tree
30
Swietenia macrophylla (dry
provenances)
Swietenia macrophylla (mesic
provenances)
Symphonia globulifera
Verticordia fimbrilepis
6
Non-mobile
Non-mobile
Shrub
10
0.68 ±
0.69
0.34 ±
0.09
0.92 ±
0.17
0.90 ±
0.10
0.50 ±
0.44
0.99 ±
0.01
0.54 ±
0.34
0.96 ±
0.03
0.87 ±
0.16
0.97 ±
0.05
0.99 ±
0.05
0.99 ±
0.04
0.85 ±
0.20
0.73 ±
0.20
0.09 ±
0.27
0.02 ±
0.02
0.33 ±
0.67
0.19 ±
0.42
0.74 ±
0.46
39
10
15
5
0.07 ±
0.13
0.05 ±
0.08
0.14 ±
0.05
0.15 ±
0.24
0.12 ±
0.41
0.31 ±
0.58
24
17
14
22
8
0.28 ±
0.08
0.45 ±
0.09
0.11 ±
0.20
0.14 ±
0.20
0.11 ±
0.60
0.02 ±
0.05
12
12
30
10
0.37 ±
0.05
0.91 ±
0.01
0.84 ±
0.04
0.52 ±
0.02
0.71 ±
0.10
1.00 ±
0.13
0.99 ±
0.10
0.85 ±
0.04
0.74 ±
0.20
0.62 ±
0.20
0.05 ±
0.10
0.11 ±
0.13
0.47 ±
0.33
(Tamaki et al, 2009)
(González-Varo et al, 2010)
(Fuchs et al, 2003)
(Murawski and Hamrick,
1991)
10
5
0.15 ±
0.06
0.15 ±
0.05
0.65 ±
0.09
0.13 ±
0.10
0.78 ±
0.07
0.92 ±
0.10
0.05 ±
0.10
0.11 ±
0.13
0.09 ±
0.05
0.07 ±
0.21
0.03 ±
0.19
0.25 ±
0.72
(Jolivet et al, 2011)
(Ramos et al, 2008)
(Cascante et al, 2002)
(Ribeiro and Lovato, 2004)
(Obayashi et al, 2002)
(Murawski et al, 1994)
(Murawski and Hamrick,
1991)
0.21 ±
0.09
0.31 ±
0.03
0.15 ±
0.03
0.25 ±
0.05
0.06 ±
0.20
0.29 ±
0.20
(Breed et al, 2012)
(Breed et al, 2012)
(Aldrich and Hamrick, 1998)
(Coates et al, 2007)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
References
Aldrich PR, Hamrick JL (1998). Reproductive dominance of pasture trees in a
fragmented tropical forest mosaic. Science 281(5373): 103-105.
Breed MF, Gardner MG, Ottewell K, Navarro C, Lowe A (2012). Shifts in
reproductive assurance strategies and inbreeding costs associated with habitat
fragmentation in Central American mahogany Ecol Lett 15(5): 444-452.
Butcher PA, Skinner AK, Gardiner CA (2005). Increased inbreeding and interspecies gene flow in remnant populations of the rare Eucalyptus benthamii.
Conserv Genet 6: 213-226.
Cascante A, Quesada M, Lobo JJ, Fuchs EA (2002). Effects of dry tropical forest
fragmentation on the reproductive success and genetic structure of the tree
Samanea saman. Conserv Biol 16(1): 137-147.
Cloutier D, Kanashiro M, Ciampi AY, Schoen DJ (2007). Impact of selective
logging on inbreeding and gene dispersal in an Amazonian tree population of
Carapa guianensis Aubl. Mol Ecol 16(4): 797-809.
Coates DJ, Sampson JF, Yates CJ (2007). Plant mating systems and assessing
population persistence in fragmented landscapes. Aust J Bot 55(3): 239-249.
Collevatti RG, Grattapaglia D, Hay JD (2001). High resolution microsatellite based
analysis of the mating system allows the detection of significant biparental
inbreeding in Caryocar brasiliense, an endangered tropical tree species. Heredity
86(1): 60-67.
Dick CW, Etchelecu G, Austerlitz F (2003). Pollen dispersal of tropical trees
(Dinizia excelsa: Fabaceae) by native insects and African honeybees in pristine
and fragmented Amazonian rainforest. Mol Ecol 12(3): 753-764.
Doligez A, Joly H (1997). Mating system of Carapa procera (Meliaceae) in the
French Guiana tropical forest. Am J Bot 84(4): 461.
Franceschinelli EV, Bawa KS (2000). The effect of ecological factors on the mating
system of a South American shrub species (Helicteres brevispira). Heredity 84(1):
116-123.
Fuchs E, Lobo J, Quesada M (2003). Effects of forest fragmentation and flowering
phenology on the reproductive success and mating patterns of the tropical dry
forest tree Pachira quinata. Conserv Biol 17(1): 149-157.
González-Varo JP, Albaladejo RG, Aparicio A, Arroyo J (2010). Linking genetic
diversity, mating patterns and progeny performance in fragmented populations of a
Mediterranean shrub. J Appl Ecol 47(6): 1242-1252.
Hall P, Orrell LC, Bawa KS (1994). Genetic diversity and mating system in a
tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Am J Bot 81(9): 1104-1111.
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
Hanson TR, Brunsfeld SJ, Finegan B, Waits LP (2008). Pollen dispersal and
genetic structure of the tropical tree Dipteryx panamensis in a fragmented Costa
Rican landscape. Mol Ecol 17(8): 2060-2073.
Hirayama K, Ishida K, Setsuko S, Tomaru N (2007). Reduced seed production,
inbreeding, and pollen shortage in a small population of a threatened tree,
Magnolia stellata. Biol Conserv 136(2): 315-323.
Hoebee SE, Young AG (2001). Low neighbourhood size and high interpopulation
differentiation in the endangered shrub Grevillea iaspicula McGill (Proteaceae).
Heredity 86(4): 489-496.
Jolivet C, Höltken AM, Liesebach H, Steiner W, Degen B (2011). Mating patterns
and pollen dispersal in four contrasting wild cherry populations (Prunus avium L.).
European Journal of Forest Research 131(4): 1-15.
Lee SL (2000). Mating system parameters of Dryobalanops aromatica Gaertn. f.
(Dipterocarpaceae) in three different forest types and a seed orchard. Heredity 85:
338-345.
Llorens TM, Byrne M, Yates CJ, Nistelberger HM, Coates DJ (2011). Evaluating
the influence of different aspects of habitat fragmentation on mating patterns and
pollen dispersal in the bird-pollinated Banksia sphaerocarpa var. caesia. Mol Ecol
21(2): 314-328.
Mathiasen P, Rovere AE, Premoli AC (2007). Genetic structure and early effects of
inbreeding in fragmented temperate forests of a self-incompatible tree, Embothrium
coccineum. Conserv Biol 21(1): 232-240.
Millar MA, Byrne M, Coates DJ, Stukely MJC, McComb JA (2000). Mating system
studies in jarrah, Eucalyptus marginata (Myrtaceae). Aust J Bot 48(4): 475-479.
Mimura M, Barbour RC, Potts BM, Vaillancourt RE, Watanabe KN (2009).
Comparison of contemporary mating patterns in continuous and fragmented
Eucalyptus globulus native forests. Mol Ecol 18(20): 4180-4192.
Murawski DA, Gunatilleke IAUN, Bawa KS (1994). The effects of selective logging
on inbreeding in Shorea megistophylla (Dipterocarpaceae) from Sri Lanka.
Conserv Biol 8(4): 997-1002.
Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1991). The effect of the density of flowering individuals
on the mating systems of nine tropical tree species. Heredity 67(2): 167-174.
Murawski DA, Hamrick JL (1992). The mating system of Cavanillesia platanifolia
under extremes of flowering-tree density : a test of predictions. Biotropica 24: 99101.
Obayashi K, Tsumura Y, Ihara-Ujino T, Niiyama K, Tanouchi H, Suyama Y et al
(2002). Genetic diversity and outcrossing rate between undisturbed and selectively
logged forests of Shorea curtisii (Dipterocarpaceae) using microsatellite dna
analysis. Int J Plant Sci 163(1): 151-158.
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
Quesada M, Stoner KE, Lobo JA, Herrerias-Diego Y, Palacios-Guevara C,
Munguía-Rosas MA et al (2004). Effects of forest fragmentation on pollinator
activity and consequences for plant reproductive success and mating patterns in
bat-pollinated Bombacaceous trees. Biotropica 36(2): 131-138.
Ramos F, Zucchi M, Solferini V, Santos F (2008). Mating systems of Psychotria
tenuinervis (Rubiaceae): distance from anthropogenic and natural edges of Atlantic
forest fragment. Biochem Genet 46(1): 88-100.
Ribeiro RA, Lovato MB (2004). Mating system in a neotropical tree species, Senna
multijuga (Fabaceae). Genet Mol Biol 27(3): 418-424.
Rocha OJ, Aguilar G (2001). Reproductive biology of the dry forest tree
Enterolobium cyclocarpum (guanacaste) in Costa Rica: a comparison between
trees left in pastures and trees in continuous forest. Am J Bot 88(9): 1607-1614.
Starr GJ, Carthew SM (1998). Genetic differentiation in isolated populations of
Hakea carinata (Proteaceae). Aust J Bot 46(6): 671-682.
Tamaki I, Ishida K, Setsuko S, Tomaru N (2009). Interpopulation variation in
mating system and late-stage inbreeding depression in Magnolia stellata. Mol Ecol
18(11): 2365-2374.
Yates CJ, Coates DJ, Elliott C, Byrne M (2007). Composition of the pollinator
community, pollination and the mating system for a shrub in fragments of species
rich kwongan in south-west Western Australia. Biodivers Conserv 16: 1379-1395.