DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 PROJECT PROPOSAL FOR GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE Name of the alliance: Partnership in Integrated Coastal Management in the Pacific Total dollar amount requested from USAID: $???? (Waiting on budget figures from Partners) Applicant name: Coastal Resources Center Principal Partner name(s): 1) Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island (CRC) 2) Institute of Applied Sciences at the University of South Pacific (USP) 3) University of Hawaii-Hilo, Pacific Aquaculture and Coastal Resources Center (UH) 4) United States Peace Corps (PC) – in Fiji, Samoa, Tonga, Vanuatu, Micronesia, Palau and Kiribati Alliance Members: College of Micronesia– Federated States of Micronesia (COM-FSM) Palau Conservation Society (PCS) Conservation Society of Pohnpei (CSP) Ponape Agricultural and Trades School/Marine Environmental Research Institute of Ponape (PATS/MERIP) Tonga National Youth Congress (TNYC) South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) ??? Project contact: Brian Crawford Coastal Resources Center, Univ. of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI, 02882 USA email: crawford@gso.uri.edu tel: (401) 874-6225 fax: (401) 789-4670 CRC Web Page: http://www.crc.uri.edu Chief Executive: Stephen Olsen Director Coastal Resources Center, Univ. of Rhode Island Narragansett, RI, 02882 USA email: olsenuri@gso.uri.edu tel: (401) 874-6501 fax: (401) 789-4670 CRC Web Page: http://www.crc.uri.edu D:\106737681.doc 1 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 2. Table of Contents (listing all page numbers and attachments) 3. Executive Summary 4. Program Description 5. Goal and Objectives 6. Background/Problem Statement 7. Proposed Interventions/Technical Approach 8. Expected Impact 9. Duration of Activity 10. Explanation of partners and their expected roles including other resources brought to bear (leveraging) and description of resources to be provided by partners and approximate value; 11. Description of the nature of the contact made with the USAID mission and/or Washington operating unit prior to submission, including the name of the person who you contacted and a brief description of USAID’s expressed interest in this alliance opportunity 12. Role of USAID (e.g., facilities, equipment, material, or personnel resources) 13. Letters or other forms of communication (emails) demonstrating non-grantee partners’ intent to participate; correspondence documenting interest from USAID country missions and/or Washington operating units and commitment to the alliance 14. Budget that identifies the total estimated cost of the program 15. Implementation Schedule 16. Relevant organizational experiences of recipient and key partner organizations ATTACHMENTS….. D:\106737681.doc 2 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Partnership in Integrated Coastal Management in the Pacific (PICMP) grows out of a shared concern held by the alliance partners for the people and environment of the tropical Pacific region. These partner organziations have entered into a long-term partnership that is committed to promoting and implementing Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) with the assistance of Peace Corps Volunteers and their working counterparts in seven countries of the Pacific Region. The goal of this proposed project is to improve the quality of life of Pacific Island Peoples by building the capacity of participating individuals, communities, Governments and Non-Governmental Organizations to manage coastal resources in an integrated and sustainable manner. This proposal is the outgrowth of a previously concluded one-year long joint PICMP initiative by the partners, that was funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The aim was to explore support for and interest in coastal resources management in the Pacific Island countries where Peace Corps currently operates: Samoa, Tonga, Fiji, Kiribati, Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, and Vanuatu. As a result of this assessment the Implementing Agencies are confident that not only does a tremendous need exist, but also Host Country Governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and communities are very interested in participating in Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) initiatives of the kind proposed in this proposal. The people of the Pacific Islands are faced with a number of inter-related issues that increasingly threaten their environment and quality of life. These include: depletion of habitat and destruction of biodiversity; inappropriate waste management and sanitation; shoreline erosion; inappropriate infrastructure development; increasing aspiration to participate in the cash economy; and a lack of coordination and collaboration between institutions and communities. The seven Pacific countries involved in this initiative have endorsed ICM as an appropriate development strategy that addresses multiple environmental and social coastal issues arising across the Pacific Region. The three integrated components of this proposed project are ICM Capacity Development of Counterparts and Volunteers in the Pacific, Village Demonstration Projects, and Regional Networking. Anticipated impacts from the funding of this proposal include: Model communities across the Pacific engaged in sustainable management and development of their coastal resources through participatory processes, A cadre of well trained and capable in-country ICM practitioners, Higher levels of awareness of coastal environmental issues in national governments and communities and thus enabling them to move forward with increased capacity to develop ICM policies, programs and laws on their own, and Information and experience on coastal issues, strategies and solutions shared across countries and institutions within the region. D:\106737681.doc 3 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 PICMP will employ a number of mutually reinforcing programmatic strategies to implement this project, including: placement of Peace Corps Volunteers national and community levels to promote ICM; backing up Volunteers and counterparts with training, materials and technical support; providing specialized training to Volunteers and counterparts, using gender sensitive approaches in participatory planning and ICM implementation, developing and distributing ICM related informational media, and providing opportunities for cross-visits for participating community members and institutional representatives. A learning-based approach will be applied to all activities to identify effective ICM models for the Pacific Region. The program strategy will employ a decentralized approach to implementation whereby a small number of regional activities are implemented to promote capacity building, networking and sharing of lessons learned, with the majority of the training initiatives, technical support and provided at the national level and demonstration projects implemented at the community level. Through this proposal the Partnership is requesting ~$XXX,000 to fund this two-year project covering seven countries ($XXk/country). These funds will be used to support training, materials development, information and communications, materials and equipment as well as small grants for community-level projects. The Partnership will match this funding with approximately $1.4 million of in-kind support, including placement of Peace Corps Volunteers and as well as from counterparts, private sector and community contributions. SHORTEN EXEC SUMMARY TO ONE PAGE! D:\106737681.doc 4 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 4. Program Description The Partnership in Integrated Coastal Management in the Pacific (PICMP) grows out of a shared concern held by the alliance members for the people and environment of the tropical Pacific region. These organizations have entered into a long-term partnership that is committed to promoting and implementing Integrated Coastal Management (ICM) with the assistance of Peace Corps Volunteers and their working host country counterparts in several countries of the Pacific Region. The goal of this proposed project is to help local communities in the Central and South Pacific, that are served by a Peace Corps volunteer, to effectively manage their coastal resources. This proposal is the outgrowth of a recently concluded one-year long joint PICMP assessment by the partners, with initial seed money from the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The aim was to explore support for and interest in coastal resources management in the Pacific Island countries where Peace Corps currently operates: Kiribati, Federated States of Micronesia, Palau, Samoa, Tonga, Fiji and Vanuatu. As a result of this assessment the Implementing Agencies are confident that not only does a tremendous need exist, but also Host Country Governments, NGOs and communities are very interested in participating in an Integrated Coastal Management initiatives of the kind proposed in this proposal. As a result of the first phase PC has made an eight-year commitment to recruiting ICM volunteers to the Pacific Region. Based on the results and new partnerships that evolved from the country roundtables, PC has recruited 80 new volunteers. These volunteers and their counterparts will need advanced training over the next few years in ICM on topics such as mariculture and coastal tourism to succeed. The principal implementing partners have a wide breadth of experiences and capabilities that make them uniquely qualified to implement this regional project. For example, Peace Corps has almost four decades of community-level experience, particularly in the fields of education, community development and environmental awareness. The University of the South Pacific currently serves 12 island nations and has special programs in marine affairs, including postgraduate and short-term training courses in ICM and community development of locally managed marine areas. The Coastal Resources Center at the University of Rhode Island has 30 years of experience in partnering with Governments, communities and Universities to develop strategies for the effective governance of coastal environments through training, institutional capacity development and codification of good practices. New partners in this next phase will include the UH with their strong involvement and technical capacity in mariculture in the Pacific Region. The College of Micronesia –FSM is the nucleus of a broad regional network in the Central Pacific. The Palau Conservation Society, a leading conservation NGO in their country, has a history of working with volunteers and communities in the field on resource assessments and environmental education. In addition to this these, there are several NGO and government agencies in support of this proposal. D:\106737681.doc 5 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 5. Goal and Objectives The goal of this proposed PICMP project is to help local communities in the Central and South Pacific, that are served by a Peace Corps volunteer, to effectively manage their coastal resources. To achieve results on the ground at the end of two years, the proposed program will address coastal issues, particularly mariculture and coastal tourism, in the Pacific through the following objectives. Capacity Development: Develop the skills of personnel in each country and principal partner organizations to provide practical training events and technical assistance interventions on ICM to volunteers, counterparts and other clients as needed. Demonstration Projects: Implement community-level projects initiated by Peace Corps volunteers and their counterparts, that address coastal issues, develop ICM plans and implement management actions that demonstrate more sustainable coastal resources management. Emphasis will be placed on small-scale mariculture, coastal tourism, environmental education and locally managed marine areas. Regional Networking: Provide mechanisms for regional sharing of information, tools and experience that builds on existing systems and institutions that can support the rapid dissemination of good ICM management practices nationally and regionally. 6. Background/Problem Statement Most rural communities in the Pacific Region are highly dependent upon their coastal resources for food and livelihood security and public well being. In the face of new and increasingly complex and interrelated threats, traditional management systems that have been utilized for centuries are losing their acceptance and effectiveness. Meanwhile, management paradigms more appropriate to the modern era have yet to be widely promoted and integrated with the valuable socio-cultural aspects of traditional management. As these nations become fully engaged in the global community, Pacific Islanders continue to search for appropriate ways to sustainably manage their coastal resources and meet their basic needs. In the Pacific region, coastal resources are increasingly threatened by coral and sand mining, overfishing, habitat destruction, sedimentation and pollution from land-based sources, poorly planned development and other pressures. These pressures stem from such issues as rapid population growth, urban migration, breakdown of traditional management, sea level rise and poor land-use planning. In the face of such developing and intensifying environmental pressures, communities are faced with diminishing food resources and livelihoods. This suite of issues is linked and demands a truly integrated approach to development. As they attempt to solve these environmental issues, Pacific Island Nations are struggling to identify mechanisms that can balance traditional management systems with modern governance systems. Solutions to this dilemma face many realities: Past attempts to address coastal resources decline through sectoral-central government have had little impact due to capacity limitations and a lack of community ownership. A concerted effort to develop a nested system of governance, that links local actions with national support, is needed for the Pacific Region. D:\106737681.doc 6 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 Local communities who are increasingly gaining the authority to manage their own resources are in need of management and business skills to compliment their extensive traditional knowledge. Many communities don’t have the time or the luxury to experience the ramifications of poor coastal development. The Pacific region shares common coastal issues along with similar challenges to development such as their small isolated geography, limited access to information and limited resource base. A regional approach is called for to effectively utilize resources and maximize the impact of activities. Acknowledging the severity of these challenges, Pacific Islanders are poised to take on new management strategies. For the countries included in this initiative there is political stability, leadership interested in coastal development/conservation and legislation devolving authority for coastal resources to villages. Development is at an early stage of new governance systems for many countries. Villages and National governments are looking for examples of effective co-management and ICM frameworks. With the natural and human impacts intensifying, and with such a favorable political climate, now is the time to act Pacific Island Countries have endorsed ICM as the best approach for developing coastal areas. Integrated Coastal Management is a continuous and dynamic planning and management process whose objective it is to minimize natural resource degradation and maximize the long-term economic and social benefits of coastal ecosystems. This approach embraces, and provides a mechanism to achieve, the core principles of participatory processes, good governance, and integration between sectors and levels of government and non-governmental organizations. Most importantly, it works. Effective village level ICM action is occurring in select locations through such programs as the Locally Managed Marine Areas (LMMA) network, using ICM methodology at the local level to fit the cultural context in the Pacific. There are also several new initiatives that have begun including the Global Environment Facility-International Waters Programme. PICMP will create linkages with these and other coastal programs to provide extension to local communities. Lessons can also be gleaned from CRC’s work in Indonesia, Tanzania Mexico and the Philippines, in linking national and local activities and in scaling up to other communities. An ICM strategy for the Pacific needs to include a regional perspective, local empowerment supported by national leadership, and a broad partnership for cost effectiveness and ownership. The combined strengths of the PICMP organizations brings together cultural awareness, voluntary resources, regional networks, and global experience in linking local empowerment with national capacity for sustainable coastal development. 7. Proposed Interventions/Technical Approach The activities contemplated for each of the components have been designed to take place at multiple levels - local, national and regional, and to be simple, low cost and mutually reinforcing. This should result in an environment conducive to ICM and an installed capacity, at all levels in order to help replicate and sustain ICM in the future. In keeping with the PICMP’s “building on what already works” philosophy, all the activities listed below have to D:\106737681.doc 7 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 some degree already been successful in the Pacific or another part of the world, and merit being more widely promoted and replicated. 7.1 Capacity Development Addressing the problem of limited capacity across the Pacific is a central focus of this partnership, as well as declared in the Barbados Small Island Development and World Summit on Sustainable Development Reports. By pooling the skills and experiences of the partners, the capacity of Host Country Agencies to organize coastal stakeholders, develop management strategies and influence development patterns will be elevated across the region. To accomplish this substantial task the Partnership will support participating national and local Host Country Agencies and NGOs, including Peace Corps staff , volunteers and counterparts, with ICM related training, materials development, mentoring and technical backstopping. Learning will be achieved through documenting good practices and lessons learned, disseminating pertinent information, monitoring and evaluating project performance, and linking organizations at all levels. Program of activities: Regional: Develop a Cadre of ICM Trainers - CRC/USP/PC/UH, along with other alliance members, will jointly develop and implement a Regional Training-of-Trainers (ToT) course to develop a cadre of ICM trainers in each country to provide long-term training and technical support to Peace Corps and other organizations in need. Potential candidates for training include our alliance members from government agencies and NGOs. A ToT will occur early in the project to train at least two partners from each country plus Peace Corps staff. These new trainers, with continued assistance from regional experts, will then develop and implement in-country training programs for PC and other clients. Additionally, they will provide on-going technical assistance to the demonstration projects. Institutional Development for ICM in the Central Pacific - CRC/USP/PC/UH will work together to assist the College of Micronesia (COM) to establish themselves as a center of excellence for ICM in the Central Pacific. Due to its central position, COM is the nucleus for a broad network of universities. The Palau Community College, College of the Marshall Islands and the University of Guam with its well-known marine science expertise will also be invited to participate in this partnership. A volunteer may be placed with COM to assist in developing their ICM library, training skills, curriculum and applied research program. To signify the institution’s commitment to ICM and the partnership, one member of the staff will be sent to the ToT and other training events in their local Peace Corps post. National/Local: Placement of ICM Volunteers at Local and National Institutions – Volunteers will be placed with institutions at the local and/or national level to support their capacity development in ICM initiatives. These placements will be tailored to local needs and requests to the US Peace Corps by host institutions. In some instances there may already be volunteers D:\106737681.doc 8 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 working in ICM related initiatives, and in other cases it will be new volunteers that are assigned to respective country programs over the next two years. Volunteers may serve in a variety of roles due to the diversity of needs and context in each nation. This may include working with national agencies on ICM policy development and implementation or at the community level through community organizations, our alliance member NGOs or universities on locally based education programs, establishment of locally managed marine areas, small scale tourism or mariculture enterprises. Training courses - Peace Corps conducts training for volunteers at the beginning of service and periodically throughout their service. However, Peace Corps posts’ normal funding levels only permit them to conduct a small number (1-2) of in-service trainings annually and volunteers usually participate in only one of these. Host counterparts rarely participate due to limited funding. Through this project, core technical training teams that include the principle partners in this program will conduct training courses for ICM volunteers and their counterparts. These training programs will be tailored to the needs of the locality. CRC, USP and UH will co-develop the training materials and provide assistance early in the process to mentor the new trainers and continue the capacity development process. As a follow-up to the training events, technical specialists in the fields of mariculture, coastal tourism, environmental education and locally managed marine areas will provide technical assistance to ongoing projects and initiatives that volunteers are involved with. Peace Corps posts receive between 1-3 new volunteer groups per year, therefore, there will be extensive demand for experienced ICM trainers in each country. Peace Corps counterparts will be involved in all of these training events, and through this experience will go on to form a permanent cadre of counterparts for future generations of Volunteers, and support their communities and organizations with ICM for years to come. 7.2 Demonstration Projects: Community Counterparts with the support of Peace Corps Volunteers will be leading the implementation of the pilot projects, with reoccurring technical support by the alliance institutions, regional technical experts and the in-country ICM Cadre of trainers. Although the specific issues and threats will vary in each community, the core issues that the projects will address include mariculture, coastal tourism development, over-fishing, sedimentation and pollution from land based sources, habitat destruction, and poor foreshore development planning. Core principles of the activities will include participatory local decision-making processes, attention to equity (specifically gender and youth), and good governance. Program of activities: Local: Placement of Volunteers in communities to initiate Community Based-ICM – New and existing Peace Corp Volunteers trained in ICM will be assigned to selected communities where they will work with local counterparts (who also receive training). They will assist the community to identify important coastal issues, develop ICM strategies, undertake environmental awareness activities, establish and manage village coastal management plans, train local people and leaders, and develop the capacity of local organizations. Village D:\106737681.doc 9 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 activities may use the LMMA process and tools, which are culturally sensitive to traditional management systems. About demonstration projects will be set up in each country. ICM Community Small Grants Program – To support the volunteers and their counterparts in the initial implementation stages of their community plans, $30,000 will be set aside for small competitive grants of approximately $1,500 per volunteer/counterpart. This mechanism will be implemented through the non-profit arm of Peace Corps’ Partnership Program, which requires a 25% cash and/or material match from the local community. As part of the continuing capacity development, community groups, with the guidance of the counterpart, will be required to apply for and manage the grant. Examples of activities that the grants will support include materials to establish marine protected areas and reduce impacts to coral reefs, tree saplings for coastal foreshore protection and resource monitoring equipment. Establishment of linkages through community cross-visits – Volunteers and Counterparts will work to establish functional linkages and networks between participating communities, other communities and host country government and NGOs, in order to promote ICM and create a supportive institutional and political environment. For example, ICM practitioners in one community would make “cross-visits” to other communities who are interested in ICM and vice versa. To further develop and strengthen these country-level networks, periodic ICM Roundtables and meetings will be held in strategic locations. Provision of Technical Assistance to Demonstration Projects – To assist these initial demonstration projects, counterparts will be able to request regional experts to provide assistance in the core focus areas of mariculture and coastal tourism. Box 1. Potential early actions by counterparts and their volunteers in the community include: Site planning and business plan for mariculture Research and monitoring (water quality, status of coral reefs) Identification of critical habitat for threatened and economically important species Erosion control and sustainable agricultural techniques for the coastal areas Expansion of Locally Managed Marine Areas Mangrove replanting Development and translation of environmental awareness material Gender and youth related actions to empower underrepresented segments of the community Investigation of supplementary sources of income and micro-crediting Development of guidelines for minimum impact of tourism development on coastal zone 7.3 Regional Networking For ICM to be effective for generations at the local level, there needs to be support at the national and regional level through enabling conditions such as awareness, policies, programs and laws. One of the strengths of this partnership is the regional-to-local network in place and continually active through Peace Corps, USP, Colleges and local NGOs. Activities will be initiated to maximize these strengths and assist organizations that have the commitment but D:\106737681.doc 10 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 lack the resources and information to act. Central to these efforts will be to make close connections and collaborative exercises with existing and future initiatives such as the International Waters Programme, Biodiversity and Climate Change Projects. Program of activities: Nationally: Placement of ICM Volunteers at the National Level – PICMP may place ICM volunteers, where appropriate and in limited numbers, with counterparts at Host Country Governments and NGOs at the national level. This can further ICM by training staff in appropriate tools and methodologies, supporting the demonstration projects’ ICM activities and LMMAs, promoting the adoption of ICM related policies, reinforcing inter-organizational linkages, and working to obtain increased commitment and resources for ICM related work. T hese secondtier Volunteers working at the national level will also provide support to their Peace Corps post’s training program and, directly, to other volunteers at the village level. These secondtier Volunteers are likely to have received special training at USP, including the ToT, early on in their service and will be encouraged to serve for three years. Convene National Advisory Group meetings – ICM trained Counterparts and their Peace Corps Volunteers at the national level will convene national advisory groups, where appropriate, to keep them informed of ICM issues and the demonstration projects. If such advisory groups exist, then the Counterparts will use that mechanism to increase dialogue and learning of coastal issues. Learning-based approach to analyze and codify effective ICM practices in the Pacific CRC will lead the partners, with the assistance of the national volunteers to review and analyze effective mechanisms for nesting local ICM action in national and regional ICM governance systems. National volunteers and their counterparts will work with their respective national advisory groups to reflect on their countries ICM efforts to codify good management practices for distribution. Outcomes from this work will be disseminated through PICMP’s knowledge management system. Regional: Establishment of ICM Knowledge Management System – CRC with the assistance of USP and COM will establish and manage a web-based knowledge management system with a database containing region-wide ICM related information. A listserve will also be established and maintained along with a web-based system that allows volunteers and counterparts to post information that others can read and comment on. In addition, information on PICMP’s activities, training materials and approaches will made available through this site. CRC and UH will contribute information on applicable models and materials from their global experience. Development of ICM media resources – The Partnership, using economies of scale that the regional approach encourages, will develop a set of complementary ICM materials, appropriate for use in the Pacific region, for utilization by Peace Corps’ and host country agencies. Where needed, countries will translate selected materials into the major language dialects to enable access for villagers. D:\106737681.doc 11 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 Dissemination of ICM newsletter and technical bulletins – PICMIP will publish a newsletter to provide updates on activities, new techniques or strategies from the field and sharing of experiences. Additionally, a series of technical bulletins will be developed and distributed across the region near the end of the project to synthesize the lessons learned. These materials will be distributed through the knowledge management system. 7.4 Project Management PICMP is an ambitious effort to link over seven countries and several international partners across a vast geographic region. Linking each of the interventions together and building off of the experiences from existing efforts will require significant project management time and skill from all of the partners. Recognizing the geographic challenges in transportation between the Central and South Pacific, project management will be broken down into the two areas. Program of activities: Initial Planning Workshops – At the beginning of the project, planning workshops will be convened between the core partners to map out in detail how the interventions will occur. This event will also allow us to plan the Regional TOT. Two planning workshops will occur, one in Central Pacific and the other in the South Pacific. To foster early networking, partners from reach region will attend the workshops outside of their geographic range. Mid-term End of Year Review and Year 2 Work Planning – Similar to the initial planning workshops, the core partners will convene to evaluate progress and share lessons. In order to foster sharing of experience, at least one demonstration project from each region selected on a competitive basis, will present their case study (a volunteer and their counterpart) as part of the regional networking. Performance Monitoring - Project evaluations will be achieved through a combination of internal and project incorporated monitoring methodologies to ensure an adaptive management approach. Three planning meetings that will coincide with regional training events will occur between the partners at the beginning, middle and end of the two-year period. The community self-monitoring methodology of the LMMA program will be linked to the internal evaluation processes of the partners. Monitoring and evaluation tools will be refined by building upon USP’s experience with LMMAs, CRC’s assessment model for coastal programs, and Peace Corps extensive volunteer performance evaluations. Evaluations and performance monitoring will occur before and after training events as well as obtaining input from communities. Assessments will review the progress and pace of activities and accomplishments, and the challenges to achieving final project goals. Most important to assess is the degree to which adoption of ICM is occurring locally and the success or constraint factors that are facilitating or impeding adoption. Examples of indicators of performance include: a) Process and activity indicators: What activities were carried out how well were they implemented? D:\106737681.doc 12 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 In how many village sites are activities being tested and adopted? b) Outcome indicators: To what extent have National Governments and NGOs adopted an ICM approach and demonstrated their commitment? Have LMMAs been established (e.g. has a formal management plan and/or ordinance been approved by the community leaders), and to what extent has the volunteer/counterpart mechanism been effective in providing guidance for communities? What impact have LMMAs in demonstration sites had in terms of community changes in attitudes and behaviors towards coastal resources use and management, and changes in environmental conditions? Multiple monitoring and assessment tools will be utilized to accommodate the abilities and availability of the respondents, from local youth to national government officials. These tools will be tested and refined while collecting the baseline data. Answers to these questions will help determine the need for changes in strategy or activities necessary to reach the final goal of having communities capable of developing LMMAs/ICM. To enable a seamless transition to life after the project, a strategy has been included in the development of these proposed activities that ensures the continuation of activities and the extension of services to a greater number of communities. Each of the proposed activities are designed to be supportive of one another with the main engine for continuation being Peace Corps eight year commitment to ICM and the demands generated from the local communities. 8. Expected Impact Anticipated impacts from this initiative include: There are at least twelve in-country professionals providing ICM training and technical assistance locally, nationally and/or regionally to communities and Peace Corps across the Pacific region. These professionals will be from government agencies, NGOs, academia and private business. About 3 of these skilled trainers will be women. Twenty villages will have implemented a significant project as part of a larger coastal management plan. from competitive small grants Sixty community members who were counterparts to a PC volunteer will be trained and capable of providing assistance to their community and surrounding villages in aspects of ICM. Peace Corps will continue to find opportunities to request their leadership in advising new counterparts in matters related to ICM. Six National Governments, 60 communities and at least 10 NGOs moving forward with increased awareness and capability to develop ICM policies, programs and laws on their own. 100% of Peace Corps Pacific Countries with examples of communities engaged in activities leading towards sustainable management and development of their coastal resources using the principles of good governance and participatory processes. Increased communication and sharing of good management practices in marine issues through active web sites, videos and newsletters across the Pacific region. Local communities in over D:\106737681.doc 13 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 120 villages and academic centers, NGOs and government agencies in seven countries will benefit from having these resources available. Educational material will include understanding the gender dimension in coastal resources management. USP & COM are centers of excellence in ICM that provides training and technical assistance to PC and other organizations across the Pacific. Training programs will have tools for mainstreaming gender awareness in coastal programs. The specific outputs that will be achieved from this initiative include (waiting input on specific numbers): 2 ICM trainers in each country providing training services to PC and other clients in ICM, mariculture and coastal tourism. 60 Counterparts and 60 volunteers trained in ICM, mariculture and tourism, and working to advance activities at the local and national level. A knowledge management system for providing clear and succinct guidance on select coastal management issues. ICM training material, and where needed in the local languages, using several forms of media. At least 5 village LMMA plans developed and 12 early actions implemented 9. Duration of Activity This project is requesting funding for two years. The network of organizations is strong and active, therefore the project will be able to initiate activities within a month of receiving funding. The first year of activity will focus on developing the capacity of in-country trainers and PC volunteer counterparts. The second year of activity will initiate demonstration projects in villages, offer technical assistance in the field, provide advanced technical training to PC programs, foster cross-visit learning between communities and share lessons learned across the regional network. 10. Explanation of partners and their expected roles (Still working on content, your input is welcomed) USAID instructions: Include other resources brought to bear (leveraging) and description of resources to be provided by partners and approximate value; CRC Why this partner? Global experience, engaged in Fiji National ICM and pilot work, some staff are returned PC volunteers, Technical leaders in ICM frameworks, CB-CRM, BMPs for tourism and mariculture in tropical climates. Partner in phase one of PICMP, experience in pilot training for PC in Vanuatu and Tonga Their Role? Lead project manager, coordinate activities, admin, regional networking, knowledge Mgt System design and development, Lead TOT facilitator and designer, Develop training D:\106737681.doc 14 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 materials for ICM trainers, Assist with instit. Dev. For Central Uni., Provide tech services in mariculture, CB-CRM and tourism, CRC will have several lead roles in the proposed PICMP initiative including being the lead project manager and sole direct recipient of funds from USAID. For programming, CRC will have a leadership role in developing the ToT course and the regional sharing of lessons learned through the development of a knowledge management system, website and regional meetings. CRC will also assist in developing good management practices for themes like small scale mariculture and coastal tourism for the Pacific. Their leveraging (describe resources and value) Staff time in match valued at $XX, Leverage travel, time, expenses from Fiji Packard at $XXX KM team at CRC their time using PICMP as pilot $XXXX PC Why this partner? 40 years in the Pacific focused on community development at the grass roots. Established network in each country with govt, ngos and regionally. Vols on the ground. Long-term presence and ability to attract funding from donors for village projects. Partner in phase one of PICMP, experience in roundtables Their Role? Recruitment and placement of PCVs in the field. Send PC staff to regional training events. Support PCVs in community relations. Continued presence in country for working with partners, arranging tech assistance, and coordinating PST and IST events. Assist with work planning and lessons learned. Regional events… Their leveraging (describe resources and value) Cost to recruit and support a PCV for two years x 60 = $XXXXX Their staff time to attend training, develop materials, work planning $XX By agreeing to participate in this initiative, Peace Corps will assign approximately 60 of Peace Corps Volunteers, valued at roughly $1,200,000, primarily for community level work in ICM related initiatives. Complementing this will be the in-kind support provided by communities in the form of labor, cash, land and local materials. At the National-level, PC will provide steady staff support throughout the life of the project, in the form of general volunteer training, coordination and back-up support. USP D:\106737681.doc 15 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 Why this partner? Regional Uni leadership in ICM for South Pacific Lead in LMMA methodology Partner in phase one of PICMP, experience in pilot training for PC in Vanuatu and Tonga Their Role? The IAS role in the PICMP initiative will be to be the lead agency in providing the variety of trainings envisaged, to coordinate regional events and to create and manage ICM information dissemination media. Host and co-facilitate the Tot Advise the Central Pacific Uni in developing expertise and extension service Provide tech training Assist with work planning and lessons learned. Regional events… Their leveraging (describe resources and value) Funds from Packard for vol community, training materials on LMMA $XX Leveraged funding $XXXXXX or match funding from other projects $XXXXXX. Break it down by what the leverage will be for. UH Why this partner? LT commitment and experience working in the Pacific Region, especially the Central Pacific. Regional experts in tourism and global experts in mariculture. Strong relationship with all Colleges, NGOs and Governments in Central Pacific Excellent performance working with CRC Their Role? Co-facilitate the ToT, provide tech training on mariculture and tourism Advise Central Pacific Uni in institutional development for ICM program Assist with work planning and lessons learned. Regional events… Their leveraging (describe resources and value) List existing projects and how they will be leveraged for travel and time $XXX Cash Contributions from partners $XXXX 11. Description of the nature of the contact made with the USAID Washington operating unit prior to submission, (CRC to complete form in Annex F) D:\106737681.doc 16 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 As follow-up to the success of phase 1 of PICMP that USAID funded, Richard Volk of the Bureau for Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade’s (EGAT) Environment Unit Water Team invited Peace Corps and CRC to present highlights and future vision of PICMP to the Water Team in Washington, DC. In addition to Mr. Volk, others in attendance included Tim Resch and Alan Hurdus. Each of them reaffirmed their support and interest in seeing the partnership continue. After receiving a summary of the proposal for GDA, Mr. Volk and Resch expressed their strong interest in this alliance opportunity via emails (see attachments). Specific areas of interest were the regional aspects of capacity-building and sharing of lessons-learned among the extensive regional partnerships that have and can continue to be cemented for coastal issues. Importantly, the Peace Corps program in the Pacific complements other USG activity in those islands affiliated with the US. 12. Role of USAID There are no USAID Missions currently present in the Pacific Island Region. USAID had a successful history in the Pacific up until the mid-1990’s. Through the East Asia and Pacific Environment Initiative, USAID has been able to provide limited support for some activities in the Pacific. The initial phase of PICMP, was supported by USAID’s EGAT office through the Coastal Resources Management II Cooperative Agreement with the Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island. USAID will be asked to participate in shaping work plans and attending regional networking events. Their experience in the region and in global themes such as coral reef protection and coastal management can provide valuable advice and comments. 13. Letters of Intent to Participate and interest from USAID A number of non-grantee partners have sent letters indicating their intent to participate in this program. A sampling of these letters are included as attachments to this proposal. Nongrantee institutions indicating their intent to participate include: Tongan National Youth Congress Palau Conservation Society Conservation Society of Pohnpei We will list all partners who send in an email or letter of intent to participate While there are no USAID missions in the Pacific nations that are included in this proposal, we have contacted USAID operating units in Washington that have previously supported activities in the Pacific as well as the previous first phase of the PICMP. Richard Volk, Alan Hurdus and Barbara Best of the EGAT Bureau and Tim Resch of the Bureau for Asia and Near East were consulted on the proposed partnership. They have expressed an interest in this project due to its regional nature and focus on key natural resource management issues in the Pacific Island Countries. Copies of their correspondence are provided as an attachment to the proposal. D:\106737681.doc 17 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 14. Budget CRC To Produce: That identifies the total estimated cost of the program (see Annex D for budget template): a. Breakout of major budget categories/activities (for example, ‘Project Analysis/Design,’ ‘Stakeholder Outreach,’ ‘Project Evaluation,’ etc.) b. Identification of funding source (i.e., by partner) for each c. A narrative description of what resources will be used for d. Include forms SF 424, 424a, and 424b UH, USP and PC: We will get a budget out to you Thursday. Please look through the proposal activities and collect general budget estimates for your group’s personnel time and unit cost, materials cost, travel and other items including your leverage and match. USP: How much is it to have a ToT and Regional Meetings on Campus? We are using some old figures but it would be good for you to confirm. Lodging should be on Campus for all of us if possible. PC: Please ask Posts how much it costs to run an IST. We are assuming some of these trainings PC can pay for PCVs to attend so we will cover counterparts, trainers, regional folks, materials and curriculum. UH: What are the costs to have work planning meetings in Hawaii? D:\106737681.doc 18 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 15. Implementation Schedule Draft Still working on Milestones and Leveraged Contributions. Please let us know what leverage you could provide to each line item. Thanks. Alliance Activities Milestones Leveraged QTR QTR QTR QTR QTR QTR Contributions 1 2 3 4 QTR 5 QTR 6 7 8 CAPICITY DEVELOPMENT TOT TOT delivered College of FSM Capacity Development ICM Library PCVs at National & Local Institutions PCV placement PST & IST Trainings Course manuals DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS PCVs and Counterparts begin Project identified Grants to village sites ICM Trainers provide training and TA Community linkages-scaling Grant award sent CRC training materials PC support CRC training materials PC support 25% community match Regional NETWORKING PCVs placed at Nat Orgs CRC KM Team Time ICM Knowledge Mgt System @ USP ICM Media Resources ICM Newsletters Regionally GMPs Guidelines Project Management Planniing Workshop in Central and South Pacific Mid-term review & Lessons Learned Regional Workshop D:\106737681.doc Detailed Workplan and TOT details Newsletter dedicated to lessons learned 19 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 15. Relevant Organizational Experiences of Recipient and Key Partner Organizations (NEED TO SHORTEN EACH ENTRY) A description of the capability of each of the key partner institutions involved in this project is provided below. Attachments at the end of the proposal include additional information. CRC The mission of the Coastal Resources Center (CRC) of the University of Rhode Island (URI) is to develop and promote more effective approaches to sustainable coastal ecosystem management worldwide. CRC is recognized as an international leader in the field of coastal management and provides programs in partnership with several international development banks, foundations and non-US bilateral donor institutions. CRC is working with partners the Asia/Pacific Region on such activities as developing national ICM frameworks, demonstration sites in coastal governance at the provincial level, economic development in mariculture, designing ICM curricula for colleges, and a USAID-Indonesia coastal program. CRC has implemented several projects under the EAPEI including capacity building for coral reef conservation and management in Southeast Asia. That project, implemented by Reef Check in FY 2001, consisted of reef education and establishing a regional coral reef monitoring and management training center in Thailand. In another EAPEI project, FY 2000, CRC convened a session at the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium to research the socioeconomic and ecological impacts resulting from the 1998 mass coral bleaching event. Institute of Applied Sciences at the University of the South Pacific The mission of the Institute of Applied Sciences at the University of the South Pacific is "to contribute to the development of the member countries of USP in the scientific, technical and resource areas". Its overriding values are to provide the highest level of quality possible in the work that it does … to develop local capability to provide Pacific islanders information and skills that will help them make better choices about the use and development of their resources. It operates through four units: Environment, Analytical Services, Food and the Herbarium. It has pioneered the use of participatory techniques to empower the community and help them better plan for their future. In this work it also uses an adaptive management approach and assists partners to choose suitable indicators of management plan success, monitor these indicators and analyze and discuss the meaning of the data they collect to see if project adjustments are necessary. This approach has been especially applied to Locally-Managed Marine Area work. At fourteen sites in Fiji IAS is helping communities develop, implement and monitor marine management plans. In addition it has forged a coalition with other NGOs and government departments to work together in a LMMA Network in which strengths and interests are combined to expand site work and ensure more sustainable government support. This work received the Equator Initiative Award at WSSD in Johannesburg as one of six global best examples of partnerships for sustainable development and poverty alleviation. Through work with the Foundations of Success, a Washington, D.C.-based program, IAS is expanding this work in other areas of the Pacific to help discover under what conditions this approach is likely to lead to conservation success. D:\106737681.doc 20 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 It has been working since 2000 with CRC to help Pacific nations develop ICM strategies. This was successfully achieved in Fiji in 2002 and a follow-up implementation grant for 2003-2004 has been funded by the Packard Foundation. It also helped design roundtable workshops in five other countries to get stakeholders together to see how they might work together and with Peace Corps to better manage their coasts. The University of the South Pacific, with its centers in eleven countries in the region connected with a state of the art USP NET satellite system, provides the larger support framework which IAS can utilize for the more effective implementation of the project. Dr Bill Aalbersberg, Dr Joeli Veitayaki, as well as Batiri Thaman with assistance from Alifereti Tawake of the Institute of Applied Sciences (IAS) at the University of the South Pacific (USP) will take primary responsibility for all work in Fiji. Dr Aalbersberg is Director of IAS and has two decades of experience in successful implementation of environmental projects in Fiji. Dr Veitayaki is coordinator of the Marine Affairs Program at USP. Ms Batiri Thaman is a graduate of the CRC Summer Institute 2002 and played a major role in preparing the Fiji ICM Background Paper and organizing the National ICM Workshop in Fiji. Mr Tawake is a graduate of the CRC Summer Institute course in 2000, and has utilized those skills developed in the course in marine management projects in Fiji, including being a driving force in developing the LMMA Network in Fiji. Analytical Laboratory Manager, Sereana Kubuabola, has a PhD in marine pollution and Isoa Korovulavula, Fellow in Environment Unit, has an MA in Environmental Economics and much experience in community-based watershed management. Mr Akuila Sovatabua, another Environment Unit Fellow, and communication specialist in the LMMA Network, was Peace Corps APCD in Fiji for many years. Dr Veitayaki and Mr Tawake also served as trainers at the 2002 CRC Summer Institute. IAS also has five postgraduate students currently doing ICM-related research work. United States Peace Corps Since 1961, more than 170,000 Volunteers have served in 136 countries. At a time when many Americans wonder how others see us, the presence of hard-working Peace Corps Volunteers ensures that we are truly known and valued by people of other nations and cultures. Volunteers live among the local people and learn the host country language, traditions, and culture. Host country governments continue to express strong, positive sentiment about the presence of Volunteers. Peace Corps' philosophy is to complement the efforts of host country nationals, agencies, and organizations. Peace Corps does not work in a vacuum. The Peace Corps collaborates with government agencies such as the Ministry of Health, Education, Agriculture, and Public Works as well as national and international non-governmental organizations in program development and planning. Volunteers partner with host country individuals, organizations, community groups, and schools at a local level to ensure projects directly address the local community's priority development needs. In following our organizing principle to strengthen the capacity of people managing their own development efforts, we work in partnership with all host country entities from the highest levels of government to the individuals in communities. D:\106737681.doc 21 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 Specific to the Pacific Region, the types of programs and Volunteer activities vary considerably across this vast and diverse region. The majority of Volunteers work in health, the environment, and education, with large numbers also engaged in small business development and agriculture. Volunteer activities in most countries also target women and youth-at-risk. University of Hawaii-Hilo Pacific Aquaculture and Coastal Resources Center Please provide a paragraph or two on your expertise in the region and in mariculture D:\106737681.doc 22 DRAFT 1 GDA 106737681 2/16/2016 Attachments – 20 Pages Max. 1. A draft letter of intent that describes roles, responsibilities, and contributions of each of the alliance partners. (This is more detailed than the non-grantee letter of support.) CRC PC USP UH 2. Curriculum vitae for key staff from USP, CRC, UH and PC. Brian Glenn Maria Bill Batiri, Alifereti or Joeli ? PC APCD of choosing? 3. Applicants must submit a list of all contracts, grants, or cooperative agreements involving similar or related programs over the past three years. Reference information shall include the location, current telephone numbers, points of contact, award numbers if available, and a brief description of the work performed. CRC only 4. Correspondence documenting interest from USAID Washington Two emails from Volk and Resch – AMBER TO Print on One Page? Annex F form required – 1 page 5. Budget Forms? 3 pages? 6. Letters of Intent to Participate or other forms of communication (emails) demonstrating non-grantee partners’ intent to participate; PCS CSP Tonga National Youth Congress? College of Micronesia Open? Open? D:\106737681.doc 23 DRAFT 1 GDA D:\106737681.doc 106737681 2/16/2016 24