AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDY OF SWEAT LODGES IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Jayur Madhusudan Mehta (Paper submitted for publication to the Journal of Southeastern Archaeology) Jayur Madhusudan Mehta, Mississippi Department of Archives and History PO Box 571, Jackson, MS 39211 (jmehta@mdah.state.ms.us) Abstract Archaeological accounts of sweat lodges have inadequately relied upon idiosyncratic notions of sweat lodge architecture to classify their subsequent remains. As a solution, this study uses ethnohistoric data on sweat lodge morphology to define a classification system for the structure. Moving away from simplistic typological systems, efforts were directed at creating an architectural grammar of sweat lodges that not only captured the rules of construction, but also emic meanings of the structure’s form and utilization. It was discovered that while structural linguistics can provide an enlightening heuristic for studying sweat lodges, the ethnohistoric data proved to be too limiting to devise a complete grammar. Therefore a proprietary typology and nomenclature are proposed that are more etic than emic; nevertheless, without approaching the data from a structuralist perspective, it would not have been possible to make deductions on their ritual functions. It is also proposed that the southeastern sweat lodge was a religious institution that reified notions of ritual purity, the cosmological structure of the universe, and the reverence for water. 2 This paper is an exercise in the epistemology of archaeological structure classification. It examines how archaeologists use feature and artifact data to interpret and classify a particular type of structure used in the Southeast during the historic, protohistoric, and most likely, prehistoric periods. Commonly known as “sweat lodge”1, this small structure was used for medicinal and religious purification, as well for ritual initiation. The remains of these structures are commonly assumed to take the form of a small circle of single-set post molds, or of a circular wall-trench in the ground, both with an internal burned area. They are generally thought to have been located anywhere, but are most often classified by archaeologists in intracommunity settings (see Davis et al 2003 and Peebles 1971:83 for some examples). It is based on this finite and generalized data that archaeologists commonly classify sweat lodges, and it is in this idiosyncrasy that this paper takes exception. Previous Investigations I begin this discussion in sweat lodge identification with the excavation of the Poplar Cove site (22AD1040)2. The site is located on a small ridge knoll in the Natchez Bluffs, a steeply dissected and hilly environment located along the western margin of the Mississippi river south of Vicksburg. An oblong feature (Figure 1) was discovered below the ground surface of a ridge knoll as a result of construction-related activities (see Mehta 2007:70-87 for a full discussion). The soil feature was bisected (Figure 2); the first half was initially excavated in arbitrary levels 1 To clarify a terminological consideration, although Native American Indian groups frequently and habitually made use of sweating, some did so without constructing specialized, single-purpose structures. Instead, they utilized extant structures within the community, such as hot-houses or winter-houses. These structures will not be considered because their form is not primarily dictated by the principles of sweating. 2 My sincerest gratitude goes to Elizabeth Boggess and her son Doug, as well as to Lieutenant Tom McGehee for their hard work and in excavating this site, and for also making this data available for analysis. 3 and the remaining using the natural stratigraphy. In the bottom of this pit, four large thermally altered stones in a matrix of charcoal and scorched earth were discovered (Figure 3). In addition to a mixed assemblage of pottery consisting of Marksville to historic period sherds, burned wood, daub, and charcoal were also present in the material assemblage. Approximately 1048.9 g of daub were recovered in the excavation, with more than a few pieces presenting thatch and reed impressions, suggesting the presence of a structure in the absence of any post holes. Based on the presence of thermally altered stones, charcoal in matrix, the remains of a small circular feature, and an anecdotal understanding of sweat lodges, the archaeologists who excavated the site classified the Poplar Cove site as supporting the remains of a sweat lodge. This paper reexamines common assumptions about the archaeological remains of sweat lodges; a small pit or depression in conjunction with a fired area and/or thermally altered stones do not necessarily indicate for the remains of a sweat lodge. Rather, it is proposed that linguistic modeling of sweat lodge forms should be conducted in order to discover underlying symbolic, thematic and/or functional commonalities that can be utilized in defining the morphology of the structure (building upon notions of classification outlined by Deetz 1972 and Krieger 1945, and studies in architecture by Glassie 1975) and its meaning within various social groups of the Southeast (Gilman 1987:538). Until my research, only anecdotal knowledge has existed on sweat lodge architecture and their archaeological remains. Thus, archaeologists did not have good data available from which to make their characterizations. A few well thought out examples are presented below. Studies by Emerson, Milner, and Pauketat in the American Bottom have emphasized the role of the sweat lodge during the Stirling phase (A.D. 1100-1200). Two structures were identified as sweat lodges at the Labras Lake site (11-S-299) by Richard Yerkes (1987). 4 Structure 400 was constructed through a wall trench design with an opening to the east, a feature thought to be common in sweat lodges (Bruchac 1993). It has an interior area of 2.06 m2 with a shallow hearth in the center (Emerson 1997:105). Structure 39 has an interior area of 2.35 m2 and was built using single-set posts (ibid). Both structures contained minimal cultural material. It appears that the lack of cultural material, a small circle of posts, and an interior hearth were the data used to classify these structures as sweat lodges. The spatial layout of these two sweat lodges in relation to the other domestic buildings is thought to represent a nodal site, or centralized habitation area, with ritual or ceremonially demarcated spaces (ibid:106). Structure 113 at the Julien Site is also thought to represent a sweat lodge (Milner 1984: Fig 4). It was constructed of a single row of 11 posts and had an internal area of 6.38 m2 with a series of superimposed off-center hearths (ibid:31). The postmolds were shallow in depth and width, approximately 12-19 cm and 10-14 cm respectively, suggesting they were constructed using small, pliable poles capable of being shaped to form a dome-shaped structure. The presence of interior hearths makes the classification of sweat lodge questionable, as will be shown later, but nevertheless Emerson’s (1997) discussion on the role of the sweat lodge in Cahokia’s hinterland is notable as it considers the dynamic social meaning of the structure. In his chapter for Architectural Variability in the Southeast, Lafferty (2007) describes the excavation of a structure at the East site (3Po610) that was approximately 3 m in diameter. The site was discovered during a cultural resource survey for the location of an enlarged highway and access ramp. Excavation of the site was conducted using surface collection, test unit excavation, and backhoe stripping. Three middens were excavated; in midden 1, a structure (Feature 410 complex) was discovered that would have been located only a few meters from the banks of Dead Timber Lake. The structure is defined by 13 small post molds around the north, west, and 5 east sides that were about 15 cm deep. In the southeast corner of the 410 complex, six ceramic cones were recovered in a matrix of what appeared to be homogenous clay. According to Lafferty, the ceramic cones could have been used as sources of heat. Lafferty documents significant amounts of heat retention in a ceramic cone he manufactured, and fired until it appeared red-hot. He then submerged it in water and noted large amounts of steam (2007:164). While Lafferty states that these kinds of cones have been discovered at several different types of sites (2007:157), neither of us found any examples of ceramic cones being used in sweat lodges in the ethnohistoric literature; therefore, his experimental archaeology exists independently of any supporting middle-range theory. It should be apparent in the preceding examples that there is a significant amount of variability in the characteristics ascribed to sweat lodges. While there is merit in the innovative discussions these studies have produced, their characterizations remain contentious and their propositions unclear until good systematic data on sweat lodges can be presented. Thus, there is a significant need for a methodical analysis of the ethnohistoric literature on Native American sweat lodges. These sources allow us to make analogies to the past and correct poorly conceived notions of how sweat lodges were made and used. Several scholars have questioned the methods used by archaeologists to classify structures (Mehta 2007, Wilson 2007:65), and others have stated that women’s menstrual huts are commonly misclassified as sweat lodges (Galloway 1997 and Schohn 2001). In order to avoid this dilemma in the future, this study aimed to create an architectural grammar that modeled the form and function of Native American sweat lodges in the Southeast. In the remainder of this paper I will present the case for ethnohistoric study and linguistic modeling, and then give data on how sweat lodge was practiced by the various protohistoric and 6 historic groups of the Southeast. Subsequently I will define a classificatory system for sweat lodges, and then compare it against the archaeology of the Poplar Cove site and other previously characterized structures. Ethnohistoric Analogy and Structural Linguistics Ethnohistoric Analogy In archaeology, analogy is “the use of information derived from one context, in this case the present, to explain data found in another context, in this case the past” (Johnson 1999:48). Early 19th-century archaeologists used their understanding of present-day cultures to determine the function and use of artifacts from prehistory. They incorrectly made analogy to the past using then-present models of form, assuming that the relationship between their cultural models and prehistoric ones to be consistent (see Ford’s Gamma-gamma hatchet example, 1954:45). This changed during the era of the “New Archaeology” as archaeologists sought to test assumptions of the past using the principles of the scientific method. Ethnoarchaeology and ethnohistoric analogy developed out of this science-centered paradigm. It was thought that through rigorous, methodically sound testing, comparative ethnological data could be useful in making deductive assertions on prehistory. Ethnohistoric analogy in particular was found to be useful in New World studies as the groups that ethnologists documented during the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries were the direct descendents of prehistoric indigenous groups. This permits, through the direct historic approach, an analysis of ethnohistoric sweat lodges that can be applied, through analogy, to prehistory. But it is not enough to simply classify form, since as social scientists, we are studying people and society, not just buildings. Therefore, methods should be utilized that allow 7 us to gain a greater understanding of prehistoric practices and meaning. These methods are described below. Linguistic Modeling Henry Glassie’s 1975 study of 18th-century house form in middle Virginia was used as a model for developing this study. His use of linguistic methods of analysis to discover grammars of design prompted me to look for patterns in sweat lodge construction that would not only allow me to predict and define their form, but might also allow a greater understanding of what the structure and ritual meant to Indians in prehistory. This bears advantage over type-variety systematics, in that not only is linguistic modeling classificatory, it is also meaning-centered. The linguistic approach attempts to get into the mind of the maker and uncover the greater significance of the grammars that structure manufacturing and design. Linguistic modeling seeks to understand the process by which the mental becomes the real. It negotiates between the idealized competence and the manufactured artifact. Structures, like all artifacts, exist in two places - in the mind of the maker, and in reality. Making a sweat lodge requires the builder to draw on collective understandings of what sweat lodges ought to looks like; therefore, they exist first as schema. Sweat lodge schemas are then built in existential space, where reality and the psyche intersect (Norberg-Schulz 1971:15-16), and where meaning is negotiated. This structure is then recreated from mind to reality, or from the symbolic to the real. Often this transition results in imperfect expressions that reflect the entropy of reality and the objectivity of gravity, thermodynamics, and wood grain. As Glassie states, Just as the rules used to generate language relate sound and meaning, so the rules used to generate artifacts relate form and use. The product of the employment of the rules should be a comprehensible statement or a usable artifact. In performance, the statement may go 8 awry and the artifact may turn out to be useless… But these are an individual’s mistakes, not the result of mistakes in the idealized competence [1975:21]. In practice, building a sweat lodge is more difficult than imagining it in one’s mind. Cultural models existed of what a sweat lodge should look like, but the real world often dictates the outcome of an object regardless of mental formulae of design. Defining an architectural grammar is effective for this particular reason, because it models the cognitive templates the builder has of the structure he wants to build (Deetz 1977:8; Glassie 1975), not what is actually built. Ideas about what buildings should look like, and what functions they should serve, are formed out of daily psychological, social, and cultural interactions with individuals and other groups (see Mehta 2007 for a more complete discussion of linguistic relation and artifact form). Of course, designing a grammar is contingent upon having adequate workable data. While Glassie’s research made use of primarily complete structures still extant on the landscape, my study worked with limited written information on buildings that are themselves ephemeral by nature. Given the fragmentary nature of the ethnohistoric record, it was not possible to collect enough complete sample cases of how sweat lodges were constructed to realize a full architectural grammar. Rather, it was decided to rely upon a more straightforward method of classifying structures, type-variety systematics, which allow for etic categories of classification. This does not disprove the efficacy of linguistic modeling, only that more complete data sets with intact artifact forms are necessary to use these methods correctly. Although many perspectives exist on typological classification (see Deetz 1972; Ford 1954; Fritz 1972; Hester et al 1975; Krieger 1944: 489; Rouse 1972), this study engages with the proposition that types are useful in the chronological and spatial control of data (Ford 1954:52) and that they not 9 necessarily be relevant to the makers themselves. I will explain the details of my type-variety system later, but first let’s explore sweat lodes in the Southeast. Sweat lodges in the Southeast The Creeks used the sweat lodge to initiate Louis le Clerc Milford, an 18th-century explorer, into the position of war chief. In addition, they, as well as the Seminole, used them during their Green Corn ceremony, which was a time of spiritual and personal renewal. The old had to be replaced with the new and bodies had to be cleansed, inside and out. It should come as no surprise, then, that a ritual involving fasting, purging and sweating was used during this time of renewal (Bartram 1791; Capron 1963:179,207; Driver 1961; Paper 1988:41). In another instance of sweating acting as a cleansing agent, Reverend Daniel S. Buttrick (1989 [1838]) reported seeing the Cherokees use the sweat lodge during their forced removal out west on the “Trail of Tears”. Many other examples exist and will be discussed later on, but what should be noted here is that although the various groups of the Southeast descend from linguistically variant groups of Siouan, Iroquoian, Caddo, and Muskogean speaking peoples, they all exhibited a fairly uniform method of ritual purification3. Finding evidence for these types of structures might possibly denote the existence of an institutional practice, what I call “the ritual of the sweat”, that was embedded within the social and religious structures of southeastern tribal groups. For the Chickasaws, Adair notes that ritual purification was essential to removing internal, bodily pollution, and if not conducted, could have seriously deleterious side effects. He 3 Only archaeology can shed light on whether or not the sweat lodge and its rituals developed as a result of independent invention or diffusion; this surely would be an interesting topic to tackle in the future. 10 writes “They first obliged them [priests and prophets] to sweat themselves for the space of three days and nights, in a small green hut, made on purpose, at a considerable distance from any dwelling” (Adair 2005[1775]:162). I have interpreted ‘Small green hut made on purpose’ to mean a small structure, built specifically for the purpose of sweating, one most likely using bentpole architecture4. Additionally, one should not forget the importance of placement on the landscape. Both Turner (1995) and von Gennep (1960) have demonstrated the importance of liminal isolation in the stages of ritual progression; thus, building this type of structure outside of preliminary settlements indicates the importance placed on isolation and separation in the ritual of the sweat. Liminality was an important aspect of the stages of purification; isolation was necessary to become appropriately pure. Adair illustrates this best when he writes “they oblige him [the impure one] to walk and encamp separately by himself, as an impure dangerous animal, till the leader hath purified him according to their usual time and method” (Adair 2005[1775]:193). Jean-Bernard Bossu, a French military captain during mid 18th century, wrote that the Choctaws used sweat lodges for many reasons, such as when they were tired after a hunt, or when returning from war. He writes that they used “sweat cabinets… the vapor filled with the essence of these herbs enters the patient’s body through his pores and his nose and restores his strength” (Bossu 1962:168, 219). His footnotes indicate that the sweat cabinets were circular and shaped like a stove, and found in the center of the village. Given that H.B. Cushman claimed that the Choctaw called their sweat lodge anuka, or hot-house and that it was generally constructed of logs and mortar (Cushman 1962:199), and that Bossu stated they were in the village center, it is possible they were describing council huts or mens’ lodges. Cushman also 4 Bent-pole architecture is known by a variety of names such as flexed roof, flexed pole or wig-wam; they are made by inserting small, flexible poles into the ground directly, either into small post-holes or a trench dug into the ground, and then joining the flexed poles together in the middle (see Lacquement 2004, 2007 for a full discussion). 11 stated that after emerging from the sweat, they ran directly to the closest river, in which they plunged head first (ibid). Milford’s initiation into the role of war chief among the Creeks details the use of a sweat lodge. He describes being sent to a circular cabin in which hot stones had been placed. The stones were heated in a fire outside of the sweat lodge. He doesn’t explicitly state where the structure was built, but his description implies that it was not built within the vicinity of the sacred square ground5 (McDermott 1956:146,158). After sweating profusely, they immediately ran to the river, which was close by, and plunged in. It was through this initiation ritual that the warriors and regional chiefs of the Creek nation inculcated Milford as their leader during times of war; he entered their sweat lodge as a foreigner, but emerged native born. The Creek sweat lodge has been described as a “dome-shaped hut, covered with hides or mats, built especially for the purpose and into this were rolled hot stones…” (Driver 1961:503). Jordan Paper, a contemporary sweat lodge scholar, believes that the Creek sweat lodge was “constructed from poles emphasizing the number four and its multiples, oriented toward the cardinal directions, with a low entrance facing east” (Paper 1988: 41). The entrance to the east symbolizes rebirth and purity, and the dome of the hut acts as a recreation of the sky where the supreme deity resides, and the hot rocks in the middle are the means by which man communicates with him. Just as the sacred fire of the Creek public square was located in the center, the heated stones of the sweat lodge are at the center of the sweat lodge. Thus, the cosmogram of the Creek square ground (see Paper 1988, Hall 1997, and Nabokov and Easton 1989:110 for an explanation) is repeated in the architecture of the sweat lodge. 5 Bartram (1853:52-58) notes that the Grand Cabin, the structure which men used for council meetings and male social events, was located across from the public square and was not a place for women and children. 12 Evidence for sweat lodge use among the Cherokees is tenuous at best; while there is significant information on their built structures within village life, descriptions of their extracommunity structures remains sparse. The naturalist William Bartram wrote that for the Cherokees “each house or habitation has besides [it] a little conical house covered with dirt, which is called the winter, or hot house: this stands a few yards distant from the mansion house opposite the front door” (1791: 365). Also known as an asi, or osi, the structure shares much in common structurally with the anuka of the Choctaw and the Creek chokofa. From this description, it appears that the structure would have been small, circular, and semi-subterranean with an internal hearth, generally used for food preparation, sleeping, men’s rituals and possibly sweating (Bartram 1791:395; Fogelson 2004:341; Mooney 1932:61; Gilbert 1943:316; Timberlake 1948:61), but not as an actual ritual sweat lodge. Mooney learned from the medicine man A`yûn'inï that the asi was often prescribed for symptoms of indigestion and biliousness; herbal decoctions were often poured over the hot stones to activate their curative nature (Mooney 1932:297). Reverend Daniel S. Buttrick, who accompanied the Cherokees during the Trail of Tears, writes that “the priest prepared a place for sweating his pupils by bending sticks and putting both ends in the ground and covering them with skins or blankets, making the tent so to resemble an umbrella” (Buttrick 1989[1838]:41-42, 45; Schroedl 1986:226). According to Buttrick, this structure was built near water and was also called osi. Given the proceeding descriptions, I think the Cherokees used their hot houses for a variety of purposes, one of those being to sweat in (contra Hally 2002:105). They also built specific structures known as sweat lodges, which were used for the initiation of priests and medicine men. The former structures were not specifically ritual structures used as such, but rather general use buildings. The latter structures would have 13 had an architecture that relied upon notions of purity, rebirth and renewal; these are the structures that have symbolic and cosmological referents that are governed by a discernable sweat lodge rule-set. Discovering the rules for sweat lodge construction is the primary objective of this study. An impressive description on the tendency for sweat lodges to be located close to water comes from John Fontaine’s notes on the Saponi Indians of Virginia during the first quarter of the 18th century. He writes, between the town and the river, upon the river side, there are several small little huts built with wattles, in the form of an oven, with a small door in one end of it… they are big enough to hold a man, and are called sweating houses. They get 10-12 pebble stones which they heat in the fire, and when they are red hot, they carry them into these little huts [Bushnell 1940:135] I find it interesting that these structures are covered with wattle and daub and not just skins, thereby lending the structures a durable rather than fleeting structural support system. One possible reason for making the structure more durable would have been because using the structure was so commonly proscribed that a sturdy reusable structure would have been more reasonable than an ephemeral, expeditious structure. The location of this structure reiterates the idea that isolation and proximity to water were necessary for the sweat to be successful. While it would have been easier for them to sweat in asis or winter homes that were right next door to their houses, or within their nucleated community, the Saponi decided to build durable sweat lodges outside of their town on the banks of the Mehirrin River. This should be understood as demonstrating for the importance of isolation and water in the ritual of the sweat. The medicinal role of the sweat lodge is often emphasized in the ethnohistoric record (recall Mooney’s education in Cherokee medicine from A`yûn'inï). Robert Beverly, an English planter from 18th-century Virginia, writes that “…they take great delight in sweating, and therefore in every town they have a sweating house, and a doctor is paid by the publick [sic] to 14 attend it” (Vogel 1970:39). Dumont du Montigny believed that the Natchez didn’t use sweat lodges, but instead, when a person was sick, the medicine man would surround a person lying in their bed with Spanish moss and then place hot smoking coals under them (Swanton 1911:85). On the other hand, their neighbors, the Chitimacha, were said to have built sweat lodges about five to six feet long, with a cavity in the center into which hot stones were placed (Swanton 1911:350). Of the Catawba, a Siouan speaking group inhabiting the Carolina piedmont, John Lawson writes that when they are ill, they “use sweating very much. If any pain seizes their limbs or body, immediately they take reeds, or small wands, and bend them umbrella fashion, covering them with skins and matchcoats” (Lawson 1967:48). The ethnohistoric record has thus repetitively emphasized several key characteristics of sweat lodges; 1) water needed to be close by, 2) they most often were ephemeral, although some were more durable, 3) they were dome shaped and circular, and 4) they most often had external fires in which stones were heated for use inside the sweat lodge. While these generalities were useful in gaining a basic understanding of sweat lodge form and function, there is still much to be understood from this data. Theory and Methods for Devising Sweat Lodge Architectural Grammars Features of Sweat Lodges The study sample consisted of twenty nine sweat lodges from the ethnohistoric record6. Sixteen variables relevant to developing an architectural grammar were identified, and they are: 6 Only 13 of these samples were from the Southeast. The remainder were from the mid-continent; although part and parcel of the prehistoric Mississippian cultural expansion, they are not presented here for the sake of brevity. 15 shape, multi-use or single-use, diameter (span), cultural group, number of people accommodated in the structure, location, proximity to water, depression in ground, orientation of door, construction materials, number of poles, location of the fire, method of heating the lodge, the number of stones (if used), and any medicinal herbs utilized (if any). Archeologically, it would be useful to know if bent-pole sweat lodges had a foundation made with post-holes or with construction trenches, but unfortunately none of the writers provided such detail. Some specified that poles were jammed into the ground (Mooney 1896; Pond 1986), which might leave the remains of post-holes behind, but as a whole, architectural data was sparse. As a general trend among all of my samples, not a single case sample had all of the data that I had coded into variables. The Type Variety System Rather than forming explicit grammars for the construction of sweat lodges, a generalized rule-set was designed that allowed the designation of types and varieties. The rule-set was created by pile sorting index cards that contained the details of how sweat lodges were built. Each card had all the key features of sweat lodge construction and use on them (listed above), and a card was made for each case sample collected. Sorting was done repetitively, varying the sorting criteria for the index cards until regular patterns became apparent in how they were made. For example, when forming groups of bent-pole structures, it was found that hearths were almost always located outside the structure. While interior hearths were present in some discussions of sweat lodges, they were only mentioned in association with multi-purpose structures used as sweat lodges, which were located within settlements. Thus, an exterior hearth was made characteristic of specialized sweat lodges. In order for an exterior hearth to be useful, one must have a way of bringing the heat from the hearth into the sweat lodge; this was done by heating 16 stones in the fire outside and then rolling them in. Therefore, stones as a source of heat were also made a characteristic feature of sweat lodges. The types and varieties defined by these rules give a proprietary nomenclature for sweat lodges not elsewhere defined and are a practical classificatory tool for archaeologists to use when characterizing structures they may discover and think to be sweat lodges. Rule-set for Sweat Lodge Construction Rule 1. Specialized structures are built because of ritual or medical proscriptions, and are characterized by the necessary feature list below: 1a. Bent pole architecture formed an amorphous or circular ring of post-holes. - Multiples of four should be expected. - Structure generally covered with skins. 1b. Fire located outside. - Large hearth with fired soils present within 1 meter of the structure. 1c. Stones used as a heat source inside the structure. - Thermally altered stones would have been sufficiently large, 3-5 lbs. 1d. Door faced east, or toward a sacred landscape feature. Rule 1 defines the necessary characteristics that constitute a sweat lodge. These conditions must be satisfied by the builder when a specialized structure for sweating was desired. Features 1a -1d were chosen as necessary features of sweat lodges because they tended to co-occur the most. Sub rule I – Type intracommunity Structure located in village or square ground area - No examples were seen of a permanent building used exclusively as a sweat lodge in the village area. - Temporary structures were built as part of a larger ritual, i.e. the Green Corn ceremony. Location separates the two types of sweat lodges, intra- and extracommunity. Type intracommunity structures are constrained by ritual proscriptions related to Green Corn 17 ceremonialism, the purification of sacred fires, or possibly for other reasons requiring a local structure. Sub rule II – Type extracommunity Structure located in peripheral areas. - Indian groups often built sweat lodges in the periphery, generally near water sources such as river banks or lake shores. Type extracommunity structures are made near streams and rivers because of social rules requiring for ritual isolation, such as for medicine man initiations, hunting party rituals, or warchief initiation. Transformation rule I – Variety, depression The floor area of the lodge can be excavated below ground surface. - If a small rise is present outside the structure, a sunken depression should be present inside the structure. The presence or absence of a depression does not appear to have a functional modification of the structure (recall Deetz’ alloformemes) and can range anywhere from a low basin to a deep semisubterranean feature. The only southeastern example of such was from Swanton (1911); the Chitimacha are said to have built such structures. Structures with excavated interiors were seen with greater frequency outside of the Southeast, such as among the Sioux, Ojibwa, Klamath, Modoc, and Chimariko (not discussed here but presented in full in Mehta 2007). Transformation rule II – Variety, permanent The exterior of the structure is not sealed with skins, but plaster. - Wattle and daub, or another form of plaster was used to seal the structure. This variety designation characterizes a durable structure made amenable to repetitive use; examples of such were not frequently present in the ethnohistoric data. Bushnell (1940) provides an example of sweat lodges built away from settlements that were daubed over with a mortar 18 made from mud and fibrous materials. These structures most likely had an intrinsic role within Saponi medicinal and religious culture and were the material expression of such. Among northern Plains groups, the Mandan (Catlin 1975:153) made permanent sweat lodges in the style of tipis with internal stone walls. Based on what we know of the importance of fasting, purging, and sweating, it is probable that the sweat lodge was an institution among Indian societies in the Southeast. Discussion The rules discussed above form combinations that define sweat lodge types and varieties. Features a-d are always present in specialized, single-purpose sweat lodges, and sub-rules I and II split sweat lodges into two types, those located in villages (type intracommunity) and those away from villages (type extracommunity). Through transformation rule I, these structures are modified by the presence of a depression in the ground (variety, Depression). Transformational rule II alters the inherent, ephemeral nature of the sweat lodge into one that is durable and used repetitively only for sweating (variety, Permanent). Table 1 presents counts of the various types of sweat lodges encountered in this study arranged according to types and sub rules. Only possibilities that were present in the study sample are listed below. Multi-purpose structures that were used as sweat lodges are listed, just to give an idea of their prevalence, but they were not considered as part of the rule set that guided the form of specialized, single-purpose sweat lodges. 19 TYPES AND SUB RULES TOTAL Type 1 a-d Sub rule I (type Intracommunity, see Seminole) 1 Type 1 a-d Sub rule II (type Extracommunity, see Creeks) 6 Type 1 a-d Sub rule II transformation rule I ( type 1 Extracommunity, variety Depression, see Chitimacha) Type 1 a-d Sub rule II transformation rule II (type 2 Extracommunity, variety Permanent, see Saponi) Multi-purpose structures 3 Table 1. Types and counts of Sweat lodges in the Southeast. As can be seen in Table 1, ephemeral structures built away from settlements are the most prevalent type of sweat lodge in the Southeast. Because of the near-ubiquity of the sweating practice, sweats often took place in multi-purpose structures, although their architecture was not guided by an ideology or religion related to sweating, purification and renewal. Extracommunity type sweat lodges, var. unspecified were the most common because they were easily made, and did not have to be durable or permanent in construction. If a sweat needed to be conducted in an isolated location, an extracommunity type sweat lodge was built near a water source. In fact, almost every mention of single-purpose sweat lodges involved running to a nearby river or stream and/or bathing in it. What is remarkable is that the semi-permanent structures that were built with wattle and daub and used as sweat lodges were also made near rivers (type extracommunity, var. permanent), thus emphasizing the importance of having water nearby. Therefore, it is posited that structures that functioned as single-purpose specialized sweat lodges, 20 whether they were ephemeral or permanent, were usually located close to streams or rivers, possibly directly within several meters of the banks because of ritual proscriptions of not letting the sweat dry on ones body. I interpolate based on this data, that the Indians of the Southeast had a kind of wasserluxus, which is a reference for the splendor of water. Gregory Poessehl has used this word to describe the obsession that the Indus valley peoples had with ritual purity through immersion bathing (2003). In order to ritually bath in their native desert environment, they had to build intricate cistern and water retention systems in their Bronze Age cities; the Essenes at Qumran were no different (Magness 2002). I see this desire for purity, by fasting, purging, sweating and then total immersion in water, to be indicative of a wasserluxus. The domed structure, with its rocks and location proximal to running water, acted in it’s totality as a semiotic representation for the belief in the purity of the body through which wasserluxous was embodied. Application of the Model No good model is complete without field-testing; therefore it was decided that two archaeological sites previously thought to be sweat lodges should be assessed using the new sweat lodge type-variety classification system. It has generally been observed that most archaeologists do not actively look for sweat lodges, but rather discover aberrant or unique structures which they then classify as sweat lodges. As this paper primarily discusses sweat lodge epistemologies, we propose to reexamine conventional understandings of sweat lodge classification using the proprietary mode developed herein. It is hoped that we can thereby gain a better understanding of what archeological features can be used to classify sweat lodges. 21 Returning to the Poplar Cove site (22Ad1040) The Poplar Cove site allowed some novel insights into structure classification. There was a significant amount of charcoal in the pit fill, probably from some burning event and the presence of a fire. Daub was present in noteworthy amounts, some with cane impressions, indicating a structure would have been present. The large stones would have been ideal for use in a sweat lodge, so it is possible that Poplar Cove could have supported such a structure. The lack of any architectural remains, such as postholes, could simply be due to the fact that small bent saplings would not leave large postholes behind. The sites distance from water was the most contradictory evidence against its classification as sweat lodge. As shown in my descriptions of sweat lodge use, ritual ablutions immediately after using the sweat lodge were considered almost a necessity. Therefore, a structure located proximal to a water source would be more likely to have been a sweat lodge. This structure is over 300 meters from water. This does not preclude the possibility that water would have been stored in large jars at the site, or in skins, but no such rims of greater magnitude were recovered. Additionally, evidence for Indians using large jars or skins for storing water to use in ritual bathing has not been observed ethnographically, nor read in the ethnohistoric literature, thus not making it a possibility that the Indians of the Southeast were building ritual-use sweat lodges far away from water sources. Not only is the site too far from Fairchilds Creek to have allowed ritual bathing to occur easily but it also doesn’t satisfy all of the requirements for sweat lodges (only rule 1c and transformation rules I and II are met). Additionally, we have no settlement or population related data for the area, which makes it difficult to assign function to the structure, as location was so critical to the functionality of the sweat lodge. It is impossible to know if the Poplar Cove site was in a liminal or sacred location, as settlement data for the area is unknown. Thus, as the model tells us, we cannot call this pit 22 feature the remains of a sweat lodge. It might have been possible to lean more towards sweat lodge if we knew the settlement distribution data, or if the structure was close to running water, but without the supporting information we cannot accurately classify this structure. Therefore I posit that without large scale excavation data for the Poplar Cove site that is spatially referenced, and without settlement data for the Natchez Bluffs, one cannot accurately predict the nature of this site/feature, particularly in regards to the classification of sweat lodge. Returning to the East site (3Po610) The feature 410 complex at the East site was characterized as a sweat lodge. A small three meter circle of 13 single-set posts was discovered in a midden. In the south-east corner, six ceramic cones were discovered in a matrix of homogenous clay. Using this data, the archaeologist arrived at the conclusion of sweat lodge. According to the type-variety system defined here, features 1a, sub-rule II, and transformation rules I and II are satisfied. The circular layout of the small, narrow and shallow post molds and the dearth of artifacts along the eastern edge of the structure satisfy feature 1a. There appear to be fired clay areas inside of the structure and in feature 427 (which could have resulted from the post-utilization burning of the structure and subsequent capping with soil). The burned clay in feature 427 could have resulted from the placement of hot ceramic cones interacting with the surrounding soil matrix, but could also result from an internal hearth. Since no hearth was documented, we cannot assign rule 1b. Rule 1c cannot be applied since no thermally altered stone was recovered, and rule Id cannot be applied since no probable door location was discovered. Sub rule II is assigned since Lafferty designates the structure remains as being located on the edges of the East site and on the banks of Dead Timber Lake (although running water appears to have been more important than stagnant water). Both transformation rules are assigned since a small basin shape to the structure was assigned, as 23 well as a small internal pit (see Mooney 1892:822 for an ethnohistoric example), and because fired daub with thatch impressions were recovered. Ultimately I believe the evidence is contentious for characterizing a sweat lodge type extracommunity var. permanent, depression, although several rules of the sweat lodge type-variety system are met. The presence of ceramic cones versus thermally altered rock is problematic, as are the large quantity of bird bones recovered in feature 427. Sweat lodges were not places of consumption but rather expectoration; Lafferty’s assertion that the bones could have been from fans is certainly plausible, but given that this has never been documented ethnohistorically, I question the interpretation. As is the case with the ceramic cones; why go to the trouble of making your own heating elements when lithic elements are not hard to come by. Indeed, in their own experimental recreation of a sweat lodge, they used twenty kg of stone instead of manufacturing ceramic cones. Ritual and Cosmology in the Sweat Lodge By means of my observations, I have found that sweat lodge was an institution with an important role in cosmology, religion and in defining social structure/space. Now that a precise definition exists of their form, we can more accurately discuss their role in society. These kinds of topics have generally been avoided in the archaeological literature where sweat lodges have been discussed. I think it is best to think of the specialized single-purpose sweat lodge as a religious artifact for the removal of bodily pollution. Other structures may have been used for sweating, but they were not artifacts that directly reflect the concepts (such as wasserluxous) represented 24 by specialized, single-purpose sweat lodges (Type 1 a-d sub rules I or II, transformational rules I and/or II). James Brown has argued for pursuing research in the archaeology of religion (1997:480-481) and for conducting studies on specialized architectural forms that are indicative of religious and ritual practices. This study proposes that sweat lodges were a religious institution that functioned to structure the importance of ritual purification. Removing impurities was an essential part of Native American religion – fasting, purging, and sweating flushed the body of its toxins, and the proximity of running or clean water was necessary afterwards for ritual ablutions. Running water was required for Medicine man initiations, ceremonial initiations, medicinal purposes, and removal of bodily pollution. The water was necessary to wash contaminants off the body that had accumulated as a result of the sweat. Just as the Indians of the Southeast often drank emetics to purge their insides, sweating was another method for taking things out of the body. It was essential practice in order to remain pure and healthy. Adair writes of the Chickasaws that “The Indian priests and prophets are initiated by unction… they are such strict observers of the law of purification and think it is so essential to obtaining health and success in war as not to allow the best beloved trader that lived among them even to enter the beloved ground” (Adair 2005:162, 193). The square grounds of the Creeks were bounded, sanctified plazas, the centrally-located sacred fire being the earthly representation of the Supreme deity (Driver 1961:499). This deity also resided in sweat lodge fires, transferring heat to stones that then released impurities from the observers of the sweat lodge ritual. It was by being in the presence of heated stones, which had absorbed power from the Supreme deity, that one was capable of having an encounter with the sacred (Hall 1997:149). Emerging from the eastward facing door, the participant began anew facing the direction in which the sun rises, symbolic of new beginnings and purity (Nabokov and Easton 1989:110; 25 Paper 1988:4). It was through the combination of semiotic elements, the symbolism of the four, the eastward facing door, the rocks representing grandfathers, and the proximity of running water that the constituent parts of the sweat lodge combined to form an artifact that was reflective of an Indian religion and cosmology. Conclusion The primary objectives of this study were to model sweat lodge form and to discover their meaning relative to the people using them. The model for the structural form of sweat lodges was developed by finding examples of sweat lodges in the ethnohistoric record for the Southeast, breaking down their construction-related information into analyzable parts, and then forming rules that guided their construction. Structural linguistics was used as a heuristic for the analysis of the structural composition of sweat lodges based on the theory that while we don’t need to always be consciously aware of our English grammar, it does constantly guide us in every sentence, paragraph and paper we write (we hope). Similarly, the construction of the sweat lodge is also thought to be guided by an underlying grammar. Using structural linguistics, which studies the syntagmatic relations between parts and wholes (Chomsky 1957:87, 92), an architectural grammar for Southeastern sweat lodges would have been useful to archeologists in the identification of sweat lodges based on the presence of just a few key features. While a syntax-based grammar on how sweat lodges were constructed was not achieved, rule sets defining the prototypical features of sweat lodges were created, and a type-variety classification system of sweat lodges was devised. 26 It was found that several different kinds of sweat lodges existed, and that there were ritual, ideological, and medicinal reasons for their use. Isolation and proximity to running water were found to be to necessary conditions for the construction of specialized single-purpose structures. These are structures that were guided by concepts related to Native American religion and the ideology of the sweat lodge. Sweating can take place in other multi-purpose structures, but their construction form is not related to the ideology of sweating nor a reverence for water (Possehl 2003). If ritual, medicinal, and/or religious reasons called for isolation and ritual ablutions, specialized structures were then built. Structural linguistics, structuralism, ethnohistoric, and traditional archaeological analyses all came together in this study. Following James Brown (1997) and Hall (1997), this thesis is part of a field of studies known as the archaeology of religion. While characterizing an architectural form was one of the primary goals of this study, understanding the meaning and use of this architectural form was also very important. The sweat lodge was a religiously meaningful structure that reified Native American ideological and cosmological principles. Ritual, ceremony, and initiation all required the use of the sweat lodge, therefore characterizing this elusive structure allows us to recognize materialized aspects of Indian religiosity wherever they are discovered. 27 Acknowledgements This paper would not have been possible with the guidance and support of Dr. Ian Brown and the students of the Gulf Coast Survey at the University of Alabama. Indeed, Dr. Brown’s insightful comments and patience were greatly appreciated Thanks also to Pratik Shah, whose advice helped immensely with this manuscript. 28 References Cited Adair, James 2005 [1775] The History of the American Indians. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. Bartram, William 1791 Travels through North and South Carolina, Georgia, East and West Florida, the Cherokee Country, the Extensive Territories of the Muscogulges, or Creek Confederacy and the Country of the Chactaws. James and Johnson, London. 1853 Observations on the Creek and Cherokee Indians, 1789: Prefatory and Supplementary Notes by E.G. Squier. Transactions of the American Ethnological Society 3(1):51-58. Bossu, Jean-Bernard 1962 [1771] Travels in the Interior of North America, 1751-1762, edited by Seymour Feiler. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Brown, James A. 1997 The Archaeology of Ancient Religion in the Eastern Woodlands. Annual Review of Anthropology 26:465-485. Bruchac, Joseph. 1993 The Native American Sweat Lodge: History and Legends. The Crossing Press, Berkeley. Bushnell, David I., Jr. 1940 Virginia Before Jamestown. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 100:125-158.Washington D.C. Butrick, Daniel S. 1989 [1838] The Journal of Revered Daniel S. Buttrick. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Capron, Louis 1953 The Medicine Bundles of the Florida Seminole and the Green Corn Dance. Bulletin No. 151, Anthropological Papers No. 35, pp. 155-209. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Catlin, George 1975 [1841] Letters and Notes on the North American Indians, edited By Michael M. Mooney. Clarkson N. Potter, Inc., New York. 29 Chomsky, Noam 1957 Syntactic Structures. Mouton, The Hague. Cushman, H.B. 1962 History of the Choctaw, Chickasaw and Natchez Indians. Reprinted, Russell and Russell. Originally printed in 1899. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. Davis, R.P. Stephen Jr., Patrick Livingood, H. Trawick Ward, and Vincas P. Steponaitis 2003 Excavating Occaneechi Town: Archaeology of an Eighteenth-Century Indian Village. Electronic document, http://www.rla.unc.edu/dig, accessed May 28, 2006 Research Labs of Archaeology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Deetz, James 1972 Archaeology as a Social Science. In Contemporary Archaeology, (ed) Mark P.Leone, pp. 112-113. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. 1977 In Small Things Forgotten: The Archaeology of Early American Life. Anchor Books, New York. Driver, Harold E. 1961 Indians of North America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Emerson, Thomas E. 1997 Cahokia and the Archaeology of Power. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London. Fogelson, Raymond D. (editor) 2004 Cherokee in the East. In Southeast, edited by Raymond D. Fogelson, pp. 586-597. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 14, William C. Sturtevant, general editor, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Ford, James A. 1954 On the Concept of Types. American Anthropologist 56(1):42-57. Fritz, John M. 1972 Archaeological Systems for Indirect Observation of the Past. In Contemporary Archaeology, edited by Mark P. Leone, Southern Illinois Press, Carbondale. Galloway, Patricia 1997 Where Have all the Menstrual Huts Gone? In Women in Prehistory, edited by Cheryl Claassen and Rosemary Joyce, pp 4762. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia. 30 Gilbert, William Harlan Jr. 1943 The Eastern Cherokees. Bulletin No. 133, Anthropological Papers No. 23, pp. 169-413. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Gilman, Patricia A. 1987 Architecture as Artifact: Pit Structures and Pueblos in the American Southwest. American Antiquity 52(3):538-864 Glassie, Henry 1975 Folk Housing in Middle Virginia: Structural Analysis of Historic Artifacts. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. Hall, Robert 1997 An Archaeology of the Soul: North American Indian Belief and Ritual. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago. Hally, David J. 2002 As Caves Below the Ground: Making Sense of Aboriginal House Form in the Protohistoric and Historic Southeast. In Between Contacts and Colonies: Archaeological Perspectives on the Protohistoric Southeast, edited by Cameron B. Wesson and Mark A. Rees, pp. 90109. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. Hester, T.R., R.F. Heizer, and J. A. Graham 1975 Field Methods in Archaeology. Mayfield Publishing Co. Johnson, Matthew 1999 Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. Krieger, Alex D. 1944 The Typological Concept. American Antiquity 9(3):271-288. Lacquement, Cameron 2004 How to Build a Mississippian House: A Study of Domestic Architecture in West-Central Alabama. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa. 2007 Introduction. In Architectural Variability in the Southeast, edited by Cameron H. Lacquement, pp. 1-11. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. 31 Lafferty, Robert J. III 2007 A Mississippian Sweat lodge. In Architectural Variability in the Southeast, edited by Cameron H. Lacquement, pp. 153-165. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. Lawson, John 1967 [1709] A New Voyage to Carolina. University of North Carolina, Kingsport Press, Inc. Kingsport, Tennessee. Magness, Jodi 2002 The Archaeology of Qumran and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Eerdmans, Cambridge. McDermott, John Francis (editor) 1956 Milford’s Memoir, or A Cursory Glance at my Different Travels and My Sojourn in the Creek Nation, translated by Geraldine De Courcy. The Lakeside Press, R.R. Donnelley and Sons Company, Chicago. Mehta, Jayur Madhusudan 2007 A Study of Sweat Lodges in the Southeastern United States. Unpublished M.A. Thesis. The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Milner, George, and Joyce Williams 1984 The Julien Site (11-S-63). American Bottom Archaeology FAI270 Site Reports No. 7. University of Illinois, Urbana. Mooney, James 1896 The Ghost-dance Religion and the Sioux Outbreak of 1890. 14th Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology, Vol. 2, pp. 641-1136. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. 1932 The Swimmer Manuscript: Cherokee Medicine. Bulletin No. 99, Bureau Of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C. Nabokov, Peter and Robert Easton 1989 Native American Architecture. Oxford University Press, New York. Norberg-Schulz, Christian 1971 Existence, Space, and Architecture. Praeger Publishing, New York. Paper, Jordan 1988 Offering Smoke: The Sacred Pipe and Native American Religion. University of Idaho Press, Moscow and Idaho. 32 Peebles, Christopher S. 1971 Moundville and Surrounding Sites: Some Structural Considerations of Mortuary Practices. In Approaches to the Social Dimension of Mortuary Practices, edited by J.A. Brown, pp. 68-91. Memoir 15. Society for American Archaeology. Pond, Samuel W. 1986 [1906] The Dakota or Sioux in Minnesota as they were in 1834. Minnesota Historical Society Press, Minnesota. Possehl, Gregory 2003 The Indus Civilization: A Contemporary Perspective. Altimira Press. Rouse, Irving 1972 Introduction to Prehistory. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. Schohn, Julie Michelle 2001 A Lodge of Their Own: A Look at Vessel Function at a Possible Cofitachequi Women's lodge. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of South Carolina, Columbia. Schroedl, Gerald F. (editor) 1986 Overhill Cherokee Archaeology at Chota-Tanasee. University of Tennessee Department of Anthropology Report of Investigations 38, Tennessee Valley Authority Publications in Anthropology 42. Swanton, John R. 1911 Indian Tribes of the Lower Mississippi Valley and Adjacent Coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin No. 43. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington D.C. Timberlake, Henry 1948 [1765] Memoirs:1756-1765. Continental Book Co. Marietta, Georgia. Turner, Victor 1995 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Aldine Transactions, New Jersey. Vogel, Virgil 1970 American Indian Medicine. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman. 33 von Gennep, Arnold 1960 The Rites of Passage. Translated by Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Wilson, Gregory D. 2007 The Archaeology of Everyday Life at Early Moundville. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa. Yerkes, Richard W. 1987 Prehistoric Life on the Mississippian Floodplain: Stone Tool Use, Settlement Organization, and Subsistence Practices at the Labras Lake Site, Illinois. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 34 Figures Figure 1. Principle soil feature at the Poplar Cove site, discovered while digging the foundation trench for a house. 35 Figure 2. Bisected feature. Shown above is the oval-shaped soil feature mid-way through excavation. The orientation of north is not known, but the string at left is thought to indicate the bisection line. Large charcoal inclusions are present in the bottom level, possibly the remains of the fire. 36 Figure 3 Figure 3. Feature fully excavated. Notice the large thermally-altered stones. The soil matrix was thick with charcoal inclusions. 37