A Roman Catholic View of Collaborative Ministry Malcolm Grundy The Roman Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales has produced a report on Collaborative Ministry called The Sign We Give.(1) They have been trying to wrestle with relatively new concepts of a clergy and laity deliberately working together in diocesan and congregational life. Coming from a more overtly hierarchical background this is a publication inspired by a freshness of approach. It begins with a reflection on Vatican II where the foundation of collaborative ministry was laid when emphasis was given to the place of lay people in the life of the Church. While agreeing that collaborative ministry is hard to define they begin with the concept of communion ‘the ability to co-ordinate all the gifts and charisms of the community, to discern them and put them to good use for the upbuilding of the Church in constant union with the Bishops. ... Collaborative ministry is not only the focus for growth or renewal in the Church today. Rather, it is one way of expressing how the church renews itself’ (p.13 and is itself a quotation from Pastores Dabo Vobis, Pope John Paul II, 1992) The report concedes that some parishes have learned their lessons by going directly for a collaborative approach, while others have begun by working with particular community groups or by listening to those with special concerns such as that of women in the Church. In all this there is an important overlap between priestly formation, inservice training, and the movement from an authoritative to a collaborative model of working. 1 In the section Collaborative Ministry: Experience and theology there are some helpful attempts at the necessary ingredients for a definition (p17) Collaborative ministry is a way of relating and working together which expresses the communion which the Church is given and to which it is called. Collaborative ministry brings together into partnership people who, through baptism and confirmation, as well as ordination and marriage, have different vocations, gifts and offices within the church. Involvement in collaborative ministry demands conscious commitment to certain values and convictions. Collaborative ministry begins from a fundamental desire to work together because we are called by the Lord to be a company of disciples, not isolated individuals. Collaborative ministry is committed to mission. It is not simply concerned with the internal life of the Church. Rather it shows to the world the possibility of transformation, of community and of unity within diversity. Here is a theology of collaborative ministry through the concepts of service based on baptism and confirmation to which all are called - and which are reflected in worship and in action. “Those who do participate actively begin to discover this theology by doing so. For many others, it continues to remain a closed book.”! There is an instructive two-way dialogue which is always taking place between church and world. The question of authority is faced in two ways. That of the authority of all the baptised and the authority of orders or office within the Church. As collaborative ministry gets into the bloodstream of a congregation there will emerge new images of leadership. The authors were attracted to the idea of leader as “moderator of the aspirations, plans and priorities of a community, always holding the common good before them.” The primary task of the priest is to enable communion to grow rather than ‘to run the parish’. There are 2 important concepts here for all denominations. The ‘nots’ of collaborative ministry are also outlined, - not strong lay involvement but little collaboration. - not just lay people having parts in the liturgy. - not changed structures without consultation in decision-making Spread throughout the rest of the report are pointers to the essentials of good practice, Collaborative ministry does not happen just because people work together or co-operate in some way. It is a gradual and mutual evolution of new patterns. Collaborative ministry is built upon good personal relationships. Collaborative teams, where personal relationships are important, highlight the importance of emotional maturity. Collaborative parishes and teams generally place a high priority on developing a shared vision, often expressed in a mission statement, or in regularly reviewed aims and objectives. The courage to face and work through conflict, negotiating until a compromise is found, and even seeking help in order to resolve it, are not weaknesses but signs of maturity and commitment. The desire for shared decision-making is the natural outcome of working collaboratively. Some decisions, especially those that set policy or touch on matters of critical importance to the community, can be shared widely and arrived at by consensus. Fear among priests and lay people that collaborative ministry will leave them little to do is a major barrier. Lack of continuity in ministerial appointments can frustrate collaborative ministry. Those working in collaborative teams have to recognize personal and professional boundaries and reconcile these with differing individual situations. It is increasingly recognized that men and women characteristically have 3 different ways of communicating and can easily misunderstand each others’ needs and intentions. Teams need to work very hard at how they communicate, and enable different members to take responsibility for what they think and feel. Notes (1) The Sign we give, Report from the Working Party on Collaborative Ministry, Catholic Bishop’s Conference of England and Wales, Matthew James Publishing 1995 4