Single – Stage Transistor Amplifier Design Ro Input Matching Circuit Gs Transistor [S] Go S in Output matching circuit GL out Zo L Maximum Gain Consideration A maximum power transfer from the input matching network to the transistor will occur when in S * A maximum power transfer from the transistor to the output matching network will occur when out L * If we assume that the matching sections at the input are lossless , we get 1 2 1 L S 21 1 S 1 S 22 L 2 GT max S in S11 * S12 S 21L 1 S 22 L L out S 22 * 2 S12 S 21s 1 S11s S 1*2 S *2 1 S S 1 1 1 * S* 22 L * L * S 22 ( S11S 22 S 21S12 ) s S 22 s 1 S11s 1 S11s S 12* S *21 S S 11 (1 S11s ) S *22 S 22 s * S 11 S 1*2 S *2 1 ( S 22 s ) * 1 S11s S *2 2 ( S 22 s ) S (1 S 22 ) S2 ( S *22 S11 ) S ( S 11* S *22 S11 S 12* S *21 ) 2 2 S 11* (1 S 22 ) S 12* S *21 S 22 2 ( S11 S *2 2 ) S2 ( S11 S 22 1) S ( S 1*1 * S 22 ) 0 2 2 2 The relation for S is S B1 B12 4 C1 2 2C1 Where B1 1 S11 S 22 2 2 2 C1 S11 S *22 Similarly , we obtain L as L B2 B22 4 C2 2 2C2 Where B2 1 S 22 S11 2 2 2 C2 S22 S 11* In the unilateral case , we set S12 0 , we then have * * S S11 , L S 22 As a result , we get GTU max 1 1 S11 2 S 21 2 1 1 S 22 2 Example : Design a amplifier for maximum gain at 4.0GHz using single – stub – matching sections . The AaAs FET has the following S parameter(50 ) f(GHz) S11 S 21 S12 S22 3.0 0.80 89 0 2.86990 0.03560 0.76 410 4.0 0.72 1160 2.60760 0.03570 0.73 540 5.0 0.66 1420 2.39540 0.03620 0.72 680 In the maximum gain , we have S B1 B12 4 C1 2 2C1 B1 1 S11 S 22 1 (0.72) 2 (0.73) 2 0.525 170 0 0.0781330 2 2 2 =1+0.518-0.533-0.297=0.748 C1 S11 S *22 0.72 1160 (0.465 j0.145)0.73540 0.72( 0.441 j 0.897) ( 0.465 j 0.145)0.73(0.586 j 0.81) (0.317 j 0.646) ( 0.113 j 0.337) ( 0.204 j0.309) 0.37 1230 0.748 0.7482 0.37 2 0.748 0.11 S 0.861230 0 0 2 0.37 123 2 0.37 123 L B2 B22 4 C2 2C2 2 0.87610 2 GS 1 1 S 2 1 3.84 5.84dB 1 0.86 2 GO S 21 6.76 8.3dB 2 GL 1 L 2 1 S 22 L 2 1.67 2.22dB The maximum transducer gain is GT max 5.84 8.3 2.22 16.36dB 0.206 50 ohm 0.120 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm 50 ohm 0.206 0.206 Stability of a Two – Port Network The two – port network is said to be unconditionally stable at a given frequency if the real ports of Z in and Z out are greater than zero for all passive load and source impedances . Potentially unstable : some passive load and source terminations can produce input and output impedances having a negative real part . Conditions for unconditional stability at a given frequency S 1 L 1 S S 12 21 L where in S11 1 S 22 in 1 out 1 out S 22 L S12 S 21s 1 S11s Graphical Analysis Of Stability Problems (1) To determine the regions where values of L and S produce in 1 and out 1 Setting in 1 and solving for L * * ( S 22 DS11 ) L S 22 D 2 2 S12 S 21 S 22 D 2 2 where D S11S22 S12 S21 Setting out 1 and solving for S * * ( S11 DS 22 ) S S11 D 2 2 S12 S 21 S11 D 2 2 L value for in 1 (output stability circle) : S12 S 21 rL cL S 22 D 2 2 * * ( S 22 DS 11 ) S 22 D 2 2 S valued for out 1 (input stability circle) rS cS S11 S12 S 21 S11 D 2 2 * * ( S11 DS 22 ) S11 D 2 2 S12 S 21L 1 1 S 22 L or S11 (1 S22 L ) S12 S21L 1 S22 L Now we define S11S22 S12 S21 We then obtain S11 L 1 S22 L Square both sides and simplify to obtain * * S11 L ( L S11 * L* S11 ) 1 S 22 L ( S 22 L* S 22 L ) 2 2 2 2 2 * * ( S 22 ) L L* ( S 22 S11 )L ( S 22 * S11 ) L* S11 1 2 2 L L * 2 * * ( S 22 S11 )L ( S 22 * S11 )L* S 22 2 2 S11 1 2 S 22 2 Now complete the square by adding L ( S 22 S ) 2 * * 11 2 S 22 2 or L 2 * * ( S 22 S11 ) S 22 2 S11 1 2 S 22 2 2 * S 22 S11 2 22 2 ( S 22 ) 2 2 * S 22 S11 S 2 2 to both side . 2 2 2 S12 S 21 S 22 2 2 Figure : Smith Chart illustration stable and unstable regions in the In the L in 1 L plane plane , on one side of the stability circle boundary , we will have and on the other side in 1 S S 12 21 L Consider the origin point ( L 0 ) , corresponding in S11 1 S S11 . 22 L Therefore , if S11 1 then in 1 i.e. the origin represents a stable operating point . On the other hank , if S11 1 , then in 1 , the origin represents an unstable operating point . The figure illustrates the two cases discussed . Similar argument can be extended to S plane to find the stable and unstable region for out . They are shown in the next figure . Figure : Smith Chart illustration stable and unstable regions in the S plane . For unconditional stability any passive load or source in the network must produce a stable condition . From a graphical point of view , for S11 1 and S 22 1 , we want the stability circles to fall completely outside the Simth Chart (as shown in the next figure ) or to completely enclose the Smith Chart (as shown in the next 2nd figure) Therefore , the conditions for unconditional stability for all passive sources and loads can be expressed in the form cL rL 1 or rL cL 1 for S11 1 and cS rS 1 or rS cS 1 for S 22 1 Figure : Conditions for unconditional stability : (a) L plane ; (b) S plane Figure : Conditions for unconditional stability : (a) L plane ; (b) S plane If either S11 1 or S 22 1 , the network cannot be unconditional stable because the termination L 0 or S 0 will produce in 1 or out 1 . Conditions for Unconditional Stability The conditions for unconditional stability , in terms of reflection coefficient , are S 1 L 1 in 1 out 1 This can be rephrased in terms of S parameters of the two – port as (1) S11 1 S 22 1 * * S12 S 21 ( S11 DS 22 ) S11 D 2 2 * * S12 S 21 ( S 22 DS11 ) S 22 D 2 2 1 1 ( rS c S 1 ) rL c L 1 reference : R.W. Anderson . “ S parameter techniques for faster and more accurate network design , “ HP Application Note 95 , 1967 . This can be concluded from a graphical point of view . (2) k>1 1 S11 S12 S 21 2 1 S 22 S12 S 21 2 Reference : K . Kurokawa , “ Power waves and the scattering matrix , “IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques , vol . MTT-13 , pp . 194-202 , March 1965 . D . Woods . “ Reappraisal of the unconditional stability criteria for active 2 – port networks in terms of S parameters , “IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems , vol . CAS -23 , no .2 , pp. 73-81 , Feb. 1976 . (3) k > 1 B1 0 B2 0 or k >1 Reference : G. E Bodway , “Two port power flow analysis using generalized scattering parameters , “Microwave Journal , vol . 10 , pp . 61-69 , May 1967 . (3) k>1 D 1 Reference : D . Woods , “ Reappraisal of the unconditional stability criteria for active 2- port networks in terms of S parameters , “ IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems , vol . CAS -23 , no . 2 . pp . 73-81 , Feb . 1976 Example : Stability Circles of a Microwave Amplifier A certain GaAs MESFET has the following S parameters measured at 9GHz with a 50- reference : S11 0.64 1700 S12 0.05150 S21 2.10300 S 22 0.57 950 Compute (a) the delta factor , and (b) the stability factor K. (c) Find the center and radius of the input stability circle and plot the circle . (d) Determine the center and radius of the output stability circle and plot the circle . Solution : (a) The delta factor is S11S22 S12S21 0.64 1700 0.57 950 0.05150 2.10300 0.30 111.450 =0.30<1 =0.09 2 (b) The stability factor K is 1 S11 S 22 2 K 2 2 S12 S 21 2 1 0.30 0.64 0.57 2 2 2 2 0.05 2.10 =1.71 > 1 (c) The input stability circle is determined as follows : * C1* S11 * S 22 0.64170 0 0.30 111.450 0.57 950 0.48176.52 0 The center of the input stability circle is cS C1* S11 2 2 0.48176.42 0 0.64 0.30 2 2 1.50176.42 0 The radius is S12 S 21 rS S11 2 2 0.05 2.10 0.64 0.30 2 2 0.33 (d) The output stability circle is found as follows : * C2* S 22 * S11 0.57950 0.30 111.450 0.64 1700 0.39103.32 0 The center of the output stability circle is cL C2* S 22 2 2 0.39103.32 0 0.57 0.30 2 2 1.70103.32 0 2 0.48 The radius is rL S12 S 21 S 22 2 2 0.05 2.10 0.57 0.30 2 Both the input and output stability circles are completely outside the Smith Chart , as shown in Fig S3 , sot the amplifier is unconditionally stable . Figure . S3 Stability circles for Example Note : 1. Even when the selection of L and S produces in 1 or out 1 , the circuit can be made stable if Re( Z S Z in ) 0 and Re( Z L Z out ) 0 2. A potentially unstable transistor can be made unconditionally stable y either resistively loading the transistor or by adding negative feedback. Example : The S parameters of a transistor at f=800MHz are S11 0.65 950 S12 0.035400 S21 51150 S 22 0.8 350 Determine the stability and show how resistive loading can stabilize the transistor . Solution : Since K<1 , the transistor is potentially unstable at f=800MHz . The input and output stability circles are calculate C S 1.79122 0 rS 1.04 CL 1.3480 rL 0.45 Figure S1 shows the plot of the stability circles , together with the stable region . It can be seen that a series resistor of approximately 29 , or a shunt resistor of approximately 500 at the output , produces stability at the output . The three choices of resistive loading are shown in Fig . S2 . The most popular is the shunt resistor configuration in Fig . S2 (c) For the stabilized shunt resistor configuration in Fig . S2 (c) (i.e. , with a 500 shunt resistor ) , the resulting S parameters are S11 0.65 940 S12 0.03241.20 S21 4.62116.20 S22 0.66 360 and from (3.3.13) and (3.3.17) K=1.04 and 0.409250.130 , which show that the stabilized network in Fig . S2 (c) is unconditionally stable at f=800MHz . Figure S1 Input and output stability circles . Figure S2 Three types of resistive loading to improve stability . Simultaneous Conjugate Match – Bilateral Case in S11 S12 S 21L 1 S 22 L out S 22 S12 S 21s 1 S11s for simultaneous Conjugate match * , in S* , out L , then ( S11 S* )(1 S22 L ) S12 S21L 0 … (3) ( S 22 L* )(1 S11S ) S12 S 21S 0 … (4) from (3) (4) , we have L S* S11 S* S 22 D S … (5) L* S 22 ….(6) L* S11 D Substitute (5) into (4) , then ( S11 S11S 22 S *22 S12 S 21S *22 )S2 ( S 22 S11 1 S11S 22 D * S12 S 21D * )S 2 S 11* D * S 22 0 2 * or C1 S B1 S C1 0 The solution for (7) is sm B1 1 B12 4C1C1* 2C1 2C1 2 B1 B12 1 2 C1 1 2 2C1 2C1 4 C1 C B 1 1 2C1 C1 B12 4 C1 2 1 B C1* B1 1 C1 2 C1 2 C1 2 1 Similarly , if we substitute (6) into (3) , we have C2 L2 B2 L C2* 0 The solution for (8) is B C 2* B2 sm 2 C2 2 C2 2 C2 2 1 B1 From (8) , if B1 >0 and 2 C 1 1 then the minus sign sm 1 the plus sign sm 1 if B1 <0 and B1 1 2 C1 then the minus sign sm 1 the plus sign sm 1 if B1 1 , then sm 1 , no matter what B1 positive or negative 2 C1 Similar considerations apply to (10) Bi Since 2Ci therefore 2 1 (i=1,2) k2 1 , Bi 1 (i = 1,2) k 1 , 2Ci TABLE : Four Case of (8) B1 0 Normal Condition B1 0 Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 B1 1 2 C1 B1 1 2 C1 B1 1 2 C1 B1 1 2 C1 k>1 k<1 k>1 k<1 Useful solution Not useful Potentially sm 1 not given in sm 1 unstable even useful though k>1 A simultaneous conjugate match having unconditional stability is possible if k>1 and D 1 , i.e. , k>1 and B1 0 or k>1 and B2 0 . The minus sign must be chosen in (8) and (10) . In what follows any reference to a simultaneous conjugate match assumes that the two – port network is unconditionally stable . In a potentially unstable situation the design procedure is bet done in terms of G P and G A The maximum transducer power gain , under simultaneous conjugate match conditions ( s Sm , L Lm ) is (1 Sm ) S 21 (1 Lm ) 2 GT ,max S 21 (1 Lm ) 2 (1 Sm ) 1 S 22 Lm 2 ( G p ,max ) 2 S 21 (1 Sm ) 2 2 (1 S11Sm )(1 S 22 Lm ) S12 S 21Sm Lm 2 2 2 (1 Lm ) 1 S11Sm S 21 S12 2 ( k k 2 1) 2 ( G A,max ) 2 Transducer Power Gain Circles – Bilateral Case (1) Unconditionally stable bilateral case , k>1 and D 1 In this situation , the terminations Sm and Lm will produce a simultaneous conjugate match which results in the maximum value of the transducer power gain . If the design not for a maximum , a constant gain circle procedure can be used . Let GT GS GO GL where GS GO S 21 and GL 1 S 2 1 in S 2 2 1 L 2 1 S 22 L 2 The procedure : (1) From G L , the constant gain circles for GL can be drawn using g i , Ri , d i , and i (i=L) . Select the desired L for a given G L gain. (2) S S 12 21 L Calculate in S11 1 S 22 in depends on L ; therefore , L this value is the maximum available power gain , and the maximum operation power gain . (3) S 21 When k=1 , we have the maximum stable gain as G MSG S 12 GMSG is a figure of merit that represents the maximum value that GT ,nax can have . It can be achieved by resistively loading the two – port (i.e. , the transistor) to make k=1 , or by using feedback. G S depends on GL (3) From G S , the constant gain circles for G S can be drawn using g i , Ri , d i , and i (i=L) . Select the desired S for a given G S gain . The value of G S might not be satisfactory and will require the selection of another L and the procedure repeated . (4) Design the matching networks . The outlined procedure is not recommended for a practical design , since in is a function of L , making the G S function dependent of the G L function . Furthermore , the centers of the gain circles do not give GT ,nax . In fact , the graphical approach becomes tedious because of the iterative process required for obtaining the desired gain . It is recommended to use operation power gain for the design of a microwave transistor amplifier in the unconditional stable bilateral case . Conclusion : When transistor S12 cannot be neglected (bilateral case) unconditionally stable : (1) GT ,nax : Simultaneous conjugate match Sm and Lm (2) other from GT ,nax : (i) output constant gain circles (ii) given a L calculate in (iii) input constant gain circles (iv) matching networks . or alternatively , input part first , then output port later . Potentially unstable : operating power gain or available power gain Example : Design a microwave amplifier using a GaAs FET to operate at f = 6Hz with maximum transducer power gain . The transistor S parameters at the linear bias point , VDS 4V and I DS 0.5I DSS , are S11 0.641 171.30 S12 0.057116.30 S 21 2.05828.50 S 22 0.572 95.70 Solution : We obtain k=1.504 and 0.3014109.880 Since k>1 and 1 , the GaAs FET is unconditionally stable . Next , we must decide if the amplifier can be considered unilateral U=0.1085 , and -0.89dB< GT GTU <1dB The inequality above shows that S12 cannot be neglected . The reflection coefficients for a simultaneous conjugate match are calculated as follows : B1 =0.9928 B2 =0.8255 C1 0.4786182.70 C2 0.3911256.10 MS 0.762177.30 and ML 0.718103.90 The maximum transducer power gain , GT ,max 2.058 (1.504 (1.504) 2 1) 13.74 0.057 or 11.38 dB The design of the matching networks using microstrip lines is illustrated in Fig. p1 , where the admittances associated with MS and ML are YMS 7.2 j1.23 (144 j 24.6) 10 3 S 50 and YML 0.414 j1.19 (8.28 j 23.8) 10 3 S 50 The input matching network can be designed with an open shunt stub of length 0.185 and a series transmission line of length 0.0615 . The output matching network is designed with an open shunt stub of length 0.176 and a series transmission line of length 0.169 . The ac amplifier schematic is shown in Jig. p2. Using Duroid( r =2.23 , h= 0.7874 mm )for the board material , we find that W=2.41mm for a characteristic impedance of 50 , ff =1.9052 , and =0.7245 0 where 0 =5cm at f=6GHz.The microstrip lengths at f=6GHz are 0185 =6.70mm 0.0615 =2.23mm Figure p1 (a) Design of the input matching network ; (b) design of the output matching network . 0.169 =6.12mm 0.176 =6.38mm The design for GT ,max will MS and ML , at 6GHz , assures that the input and output VSWR are 1 . Finally , we should point out that the stability must be checked at all frequencies , so that the reflection coefficients stable operation . MS and ML provide Figure p1 (continued) Figure p2 The ac schematic of a GaAs FET microwave amplifier . All microstrip lines have a characteristic impedance of 50 . Operating Power Gain Circles The operating power gain circle procedure for both unconditionally stable and potentially unstable transistors is simple and practical . (1) unconditionally stable bilateral case S 21 (1 L ) 2 GP 2 where gp S 21 g p 2 (1 in ) 1 S 22 L 2 2 1 L 2 2 S DL (1 11 ) 1 S 22 L 1 S 22 L 1 L 2 2 1 S 22 L S11 DL 2 1 L 2 1 S11 L ( S 22 D ) 2 Re( L C 2 ) 2 2 2 2 where C2 S 22 DS11* Let L u L jvL Re( LC2 ) uL Re[C2 ] vL Im[ C2 ] 2 g P Re[ C 2* ] g P Im[ C 2* ] v L then u L 2 2 2 2 1 g P ( S 22 D ) 1 g P ( S 22 D ) 2 2 1 2 k S S g S S gP 12 21 P 12 21 2 2 1 g P ( S 22 D ) 1 2 2 2 This equation is a family of circles in the uL vL plane with g P as a parameter . The centers of the circles are located at P uP jvP g P Re[ C2* ] 1 g P ( S22 D ) 2 2 +j g P Im[ C2* ] 1 g P ( S22 D ) 2 2 The distance from the origin of the Smith Chart to the centers of the circles is given by d P P u v 2 2 P P g P C 2* 1 g P ( S 22 D ) 2 2 The radii of the circles are given by RP 1 2k S 12 S 21 g P S12 S 21 g P 2 2 1 2 1 g P ( S 22 D ) 2 2 The centers of the power gain circles are located along a line with an angle tan 1 Im[ C 2* ] Re[ C 2* ] We can also expect that the maximum operation power gain occurs when RP =0 . Therefore , g P2 ,max S12 S 21 2k S12 S 21 g P ,max 1 0 2 The solution for this equation for unconditional stability is g P ,max 1 ( k k 2 1) S12 S 21 G P ,max S 21 S12 ( k k 2 1) For a given G P , L is selected from the constant operating power gain circles . G P ,max results when L is selected at the distance where g P ,max = GP ,max S 21 2 .The maximum output power results when a conjugate * match is selected at the input (i.e. , S in )and the input power is equal to the maximum available input power . Therefore , under these circumstances the maximum transducer power gain ( GT ,max ) and the maximum operating power gain are equal , and the values of S and L that result in G P ,max are identical to Sm and Lm , respectively . The procedure for drawing a constant operating power gain circles in the Smith Chart is as follows : (1) For a given G P , the radius and center of the constant operating power gain circles are given by P and R P . (2) Select the desired L . (3) For the given L , maximum output power is obtained with a conjugate match at the input . ( S in* ) . This value of S produces the transducer power gain GT GP . Example : Design the amplifier in last example to have an operating power gain of 9bB instead of GT ,max GP ,max 11.38dB. Solution : Since S 21 ( 2.058) 2 4.235 or 6.27dB 2 then g P GP S 21 2 7.94 1.875 4,235 From the results in Example P1 , k=1.504 , 0.3014 , and C2 0.3911256.10 . Therefore , the radius and center of the 9-dB operating power gain circle , RP 0.431 and C P 0.508103.9 0 . Figure P3 Operating power gain circle for GP 9dB . The load reflection coefficient can be selected at point A , namely L 0.3647.50 . Then the required S for maximum output power is * S S S in* S11 12 21 L 0.629175.510 1 S 22 L The location of GP ,max 11.38dB can be found as follows : g P ,max = GP,max S 21 2 13.74 3.24 (2.058) 2 RP ,max =0 and g P ,max g P ,max C 2* 1 g P ,max ( S 22 ) 2 2 0.718103.9 0 At the location of G P ,max , we obtain from Fig. P3 L,max 0.718103.90 . This value of L ,max is identical to the value ML found in last example . The associated S for maximum output power is * S ,max S S S11 12 21 L,max 0.762177.30 1 S 22 L,max which is identical to the value of MS in last example . Example : Constant Operating Power – Gain Circles A certain AaAs MESFET has the following S parameters measured at 8 GHz with a 50- resistance : S11 0.26 550 S12 0.0880 0 S 21 2.14650 S 22 0.82 30 0 Plot the power – gain circles . Solution : (1) Compute the delta factor and the stability factor k : = 0.26 550 0.82 30 0 - 0.0880 0 2.14650 0.36 62.7 0 0.36 1 0.13 2 1 0.36 0.26 0.82 2 k 2 2 1.15 1 2 0.08 2.14 (2) The maximum operating power gain is GP ,max 2.14 1.15 (1.15) 2 1 0.08 =15.52=11.91dB (3) Compute g P ,max : 15.52 g P ,max 2.14 2 3.39 (4) The distance of the circle center is computed as C2* S *22 S11 0.82300 0.3662.7 0 0.26 550 = 0.7332.830 1 2 1.15 0.08 2.14 3.39 0.08 2.14 (3.39) 2 2 d pt 1 3.39 0.82 0.36 2 2 0.00 (6) Compute the distances and the radii of the circles for the power gains of 10, 8, and 6 dB (7) The computed values are tabulated in Table TABLE COMPUTED VALUES GP ,max (dB ) (Numerical) gP dP rP 11.91 15.52 3.39 0.87 0 10 10 2.18 0.73 0.25 8 6.31 1.38 0.58 0.41 6 3.98 0.87 0.43 0.56 (8) Plot the power - gain circles on the Smith Chart as shown in Fig. P4 (9) The normalized load impedance for 11.91-dB power gain is read from the plot at l as z l 0.80 j3.20 The load impedance is Z l 40 j160 (10) For each value of the distance d p used for the power gain desired , maximum output power occurs with a conjugate match at the input for * which in s . We have 0.0880 0 2.14650 0.8732.830 * s (0.26 55 ) 0 0 1 0.82 30 0.8732.83 0 0.31 76.870 Then read zs at s as zs 0.95 j0.65 and the input impedance is zs 47.5 j32.5 Figure P4 Constant operating power – gain circles for Example (2) Potentially Unstable Bilateral Case Design Procedures 1. Draw the constant operating power – gain circle for a given power gain GP in decibels . 2. Draw the output stability circles . 3. Choose l in the stable region . 4. Compute in and determine if a conjugate match at the input is possible . * 5. Draw the input stability circle and determine if s in is within the input stable region . 6. If s in* is not in the stable region (or in the stable region but very close to the input stability circle) , a new value of s must be selected arbitrarily or a value of G P is chosen again . Be careful to ensure that the values of l and s should not be too close to their respective stability circles , because oscillation may occur when the input and output circles are not matched . Design Example : Operating Power – Gain Circles for Potentially Unstable Bilateral Case A certain GaAs MESFET has the following S parameter measured at 9GHz with a 50- resistance reference : S11 0.45 600 S12 0.0970 0 S 21 2.5074 0 S 22 0.80 50 0 Design an amplifier for an operating power gain of 10 dB Solution : 1. Compute the delta factor and the stability factor k = 0.45 60 0 0.80 50 0 - 0.0970 0 2.5074 0 0.20 70.7 0 0.20 1 0.04 2 1 0.04 0.45 0.80 2 k 2 0.09 2.5 2 0.44 1 The device is potentially unstable because k<1 2. Compute the maximum stable power gain at k=1 . Gmsp S 21 S12 2.5 27.78 14.44dB 0.09 A 10- dB power gain is possible . 3. Compute d p and rp for the 10- dB operating power – gain circle . gp GP S 21 2 10 2.5 2 1.60 * C2* S 22 * S11 0.8050 0 0.2020 0 0.45 60 0 0.7354.550 d pt 1.60 0.7354.550 1 1.6 ( 0.8 0.20 ) 2 2 0.6054.550 1 2 0.44 0.09 2.5 1.6 0.09 2.5 (1.6) 2 2 rp 1 1.6( 0.80 0.20 ) 2 2 0.46 The 10- dB power gain circle is plotted on the Smith Chart shown in Fig. p5 4. Compute d l and rl for the output stability circle . C2* 0.7354.550 Cl rl 0.7354.550 0.80 0.20 2 2 0.09 2.50 0.80 0.20 2 2 1.2254.550 0.38 The output stability circle is plotted on the same Smith Chart. 5. Since S11 1 , the stable region is the region outside the output stability circle . The load reflection coefficient l is chosen on the 10- dB power – gain circle at the location A .Then l 0.381 0 04 z l 0.70 j0.50 Z l 35 j 25 Figure P5 Potential stability for Example 6. Compute s for a possible conjugate match. 0.0970 0 2.5074 0 s (0.45 60 ) * 0.30 266.2 0 0 0 1 0.80 50 0.38104 * in 0 7. Compute d s and rs for the input stability circle . C1* 0.4560 0 0.2070.7 0 0.80 50 0 0.3576.37 0 cs 0.3576.37 0 0.45 0.20 2 2 2.1976.37 0 rs 0.09 2.50 0.45 0.20 2 2 1.41 The input stability circle is plotted on the same Smith Chart . 8. From Fig P5 s is a stable source reflection coefficient because it is located in the stable region outside the input stability circle . Example : The S parameters of a GaAs FET at I D 50% I DSS , I DSS 10mA , VDS 5V and f=8GHz are S11 0.5 180 0 S12 0.0830 0 S 21 2.570 0 S 22 0.8 100 0 Design an amplifier with GP 10dB . Solution :(1) First check the stability of the transistor . We obtain k=0.4 and D=0.223 62.12 0 . This GaAs FET is potentially unstable . G MSG S 21 S12 The 31.25 or 14.9 dB . (2) In order to design for GP 10dB (4.9dB less than the GMSG ) , the 10 dB operating power gain circle and the output stability circle must be calculated . The radius and center of the 10 dB power gain circle are RP 0.473 and C P 0.57297.2 0 . The radius and center of the output stability circle are rL 0.34 and C L 1.1897.2 0 . (3) The Smith Chart in Fig. P6 shows the construction of the 10 dB operating power gain circle and the output stability circle . Since S11 1 , the stable region is the region outside the output stability circle . L is selected on the 10 dB power gain circle at location A , namely L 0.197 0 or Z L 50(0.96 j0.19) . (4) For a conjugate match at the input , S is given by S in* 0.52179.32 0 and we must determine if the value of S is in the stable region . The radius and center of the input stability circle are rS 1.0 and C S 1.671710 , where the stable region is the region outside the input stability circle . Therefore , S is a stable source reflection coefficient . Figure: p6 Power and stability circles construction for Example Available Power Gain Circles The available power gain is independent of the load impedance . The derivation of the constant available power gain circles is similar to that of the operating power gain circles . (1) unconditionally stable bilateral case S 21 (1 S ) 2 GA 2 (1 out ) 1 S11S where 2 ga S 21 g a 2 2 1 S 2 2 S DS (1 22 ) 1 S11S 1 S11S 1 S 2 2 1 S11S S 22 DS 2 2 1 S 2 1 S 22 S ( S11 D ) 2 Re( S C1 ) 2 2 2 2 Let S u S jvS Re( S C1 ) u S Re[C1 ] v S Im[ C1 ] 2 g a Re[ C1* ] g a Im[ C1* ] v S then u S 2 2 2 2 1 g a ( S11 D ) 1 g a ( S11 D ) 1 2k S S g S S g 2 12 21 a 12 21 a 2 2 1 g a ( S11 D ) 1 2 2 2 This equation is a family of circles in the u S , v S plane with g a as a parameter . The centers of the circles are located at a u a jva g a C1* 1 g a ( S11 D ) 2 2 The distance from the center of the Smith Chart to the centers of the circles is given by d a a u v 2 a 2 a g a C1* 1 g a ( S11 D ) 2 2 The radii of the circles are given by Ra 1 2k S S 21 g a S12 S 21 g 2 12 2 a 1 2 1 g a ( S11 D ) 2 2 The centers of the available power gain circles are located along a line with an angle tan 1 Im[ C1* ] Re[ C1* ]