The Proposed Model Rules of Professional Conduct include a

advertisement
1
2
3
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COUNCIL OF DELEGATES
OF THE OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION
4
The Council of Delegates recommends that the following Rules and Comments be
5
approved without revision as proposed by the Supreme Court Task Force on Rules of
6
Professional Conduct:
7
Rule
Description
1.1
Competence
1.3
Diligence
1.4
Communication
1.11
Special Conflicts of Interest for Former and Current
Government Officers and Employees
1.12
Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator or Other Third-Party
Neutral
1.14
Client with Diminished Capacity
1.16
Terminating Representation
1.17
Sale of Law Practice
2.3
Evaluation for Use by Third Persons
2.4
Lawyers Serving as Arbitrator, Mediator, or Third-Party
Neutral
3.1
Meritorious Claims and Contentions
3.4
Fairness to Opposing Parties and Counsel
3.5
Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal
3.6
Trial Publicity
3.8
Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor
8
9
3.9
Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings
4.2
Communication with Person Represented by Counsel
4.3
Dealing with Unrepresented Person
5.1
Responsibilities of Partners, Manager, and Supervisory
Lawyers
5.2
Responsibilities of a Subordinate Lawyer
5.3
Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants
5.4
Professional Independence of a Lawyer
5.5
Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law
5.6
Restrictions on Right to Practice
5.7
Responsibilities Regarding Law-related Services
6.5
Nonprofit and Court-Annexed Limited Legal Service
Programs
7.3
Direct Contact with Prospective Clients
7.6
Political Contributions to Obtain Government Legal
Engagements or Appointments by Judges [Not
Recommended; See Reporter’s Note]
8.5
Disciplinary Authority; Choice of Law
The Council of Delegates recommends adoption of the following Rules and comments
10
with the changes noted:
11
Rule 1.2
12
(1)
In subsection (c), delete lines 17-22 and insert the following:
13
“(c) A lawyer may limit the scope of representation if the limitation is
14
reasonable under the circumstances and the client gives informed consent.”
-2-
15
(2)
In the comments, delete lines 89-115 and insert, “The scope of services to be
16
provided by a lawyer may be limited by agreement with the client or by the
17
terms under which the lawyer’s services are made available to the client.
18
When a lawyer has been retained by an insurer to represent an insured, for
19
example, the representation may be limited to matters related to the
20
insurance coverage. A limited representation may be appropriate because
21
the client has limited objectives for the representation. In addition, the terms
22
upon which representation is undertaken may exclude specific means that
23
might otherwise be used to accomplish the client’s objectives. Such
24
limitations may exclude actions that the client thinks are too costly or that the
25
lawyer regards as repugnant or imprudent.
26
Although this Rule affords the lawyer and client substantial latitude to
27
limit the representation, the limitation must be reasonable under the
28
circumstances. If, for example, a client’s objective is limited to securing
29
general information about the law the client needs in order to handle a
30
common and typically uncomplicated legal problem, the lawyer and client may
31
agree that the lawyer’s services will be limited to a brief telephone
32
consultation. Such a limitation, however, would not be reasonable if the time
33
allotted was not sufficient to yield advice upon which the client could rely.
34
Although an agreement for a limited representation does not exempt a lawyer
35
from the duty to provide competent representation, the limitation is a factor to
36
be considered when determining the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness and
37
preparation reasonably necessary for the representation. See Rule 1.1.
-3-
38
All agreements concerning a lawyer’s representation of a client must accord
39
with the Rules of Professional Conduct and other law. See, e.g., Rules 1.1,
40
1.8 and 5.6.”
41
Rule 1.5
42
(1)
Delete subsection (b) (lines 18-24) and insert the following: “Either before a
43
lawyer undertakes a representation or within a reasonable time after
44
commencing a representation, a lawyer shall communicate to the client both
45
the scope of the representation the lawyer undertakes and the basis or rate of
46
the fee and expenses for which the client will be responsible for the lawyer’s
47
services. Likewise, a lawyer shall promptly communicate to the client any
48
changes in the basis or rate of the fee or expenses.”
49
(2)
the word “A”; and delete line 95 in its entirety.
50
51
In Comment [2], delete lines 84 through line 92; delete line 94 beginning with
Rule 1.6
52
At line 13 on Page A-43 delete “illegal” and insert “criminal”.
53
Add comment [7]. “In a matter involving a fee dispute among lawyers arising under
54
Rule 1.5(e), or otherwise, where the client has no substantial financial interest in the
55
resolution of the matter, client confidences and secrets may only be disclosed during
56
a mediation or arbitration provided pursuant to Rule 1.5(f). Concerning fees, client
57
confidences or secrets may be disclosed if the controversy over the amount or
58
liability for the fee is between the lawyer and the client.”
-4-
59
Rule 1.7
60
In line 2 of Rule 1.7 at the beginning of the sentence, insert the words, “Unless
61
otherwise required by law.”
62
Delete lines 10 through 12 and substitute the following therefor:
63
“(b) Notwithstanding the existence of a concurrent conflict of interest under division
64
(a) of this rule, a lawyer may represent a client if all of the following apply:”
65
In Comment [18] insert the following at line 195:
66
“A lawyer representing a fiduciary does not, solely by that representation, engage in
67
multiple representation of other parties to whom the fiduciary owes fiduciary duties.”
68
Rule 1.8
69
In line 4, delete the words, “enter into a business transaction with a client or”.
70
In line 73, after the word “disclose”, insert the words “discoverable and non-
71
confidential”.
72
In line 76, delete the words, “case or”.
73
74
75
Rule 1.9
In lines 4 and 7 “substantially” should not be italicized since it is not a defined term.
Rule 1.10
76
Delete lines 17 through 20.
77
Add Comment [9] at line 141:
78
“[9] ‘Substantially related’ as used in Rule 1.10(b)(1) and (d) is defined in Comment
79
[3] of Rule 1.9 (see Rule 1.0, Comment [11]).”
80
Rule 1.13
81
Delete the words, “or reasonably should know” in line 7.
-5-
82
Delete lines 16 and 17 and substitute the following:
83
“(c) Except as provided in paragraph (d), if
84
“(1) despite the lawyer’s efforts in accordance with paragraph (b) the highest
85
authority that can act on behalf of the organization insists upon or fails to address
86
in a timely and appropriate manner an action, or a refusal to act, that is clearly a
87
violation of law, and
88
“(2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the violation is reasonably certain to
89
result in substantial injury to the organization, then the lawyer may reveal
90
information relating to the representation whether or not Rule 1.6 permits such
91
disclosure, but only if and to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary
92
to prevent substantial injury to the organization.
93
“(d) Paragraph (c) shall not apply with respect to information relating to a lawyer’s
94
representation of an organization to investigate an alleged violation of law, or to
95
defend the organization or an officer, employee or other constituent associated
96
with the organization against a claim arising out of an alleged violation of law.
97
(e) A lawyer who reasonably believes that he or she has been discharged
98
because of the lawyer’s action taken pursuant to paragraph (b) or (c), or who
99
withdraws under circumstances that require or permit the lawyer to take action
100
under either of those paragraphs, shall proceed as the lawyer reasonably
101
believes necessary to assure that the organization’s highest authority is informed
102
of the lawyer’s discharge or withdrawal.”
-6-
103
Rule 1.15
104
In line 4, delete the words, “separate interest bearing” and insert the word “trust”.
105
In line 9, delete the word “seven” and insert the word “three”.
106
Delete lines 23 through 31.
107
Rule 1.18
108
Delete everything after “matter” in line 11 through line 25.
109
Add Comment [10] at line 84:
110
“[10] ‘Substantially related’ as used in Rule 1.18(c) is defined in Comment [3] of
111
Rule 1.9. (See Rule 1.0, Comment [11]).”
112
113
114
Rule 2.1
Delete the second sentence, beginning in line 3 and ending in line 5.
Rule 3.3
115
Delete lines 18 through 21 and insert the words, “The duties stated in Divisions
116
(a) and (b) of this rule continue to the conclusion of the proceeding.”
117
118
119
Rule 3.7
Insert “(b)” in line 5 before “Except”.
Rule 4.1
120
Delete lines 5 and 6 and insert the words “(b) fail to disclose a material fact to a
121
third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or
122
fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6.”
123
Rule 4.4
124
In Comment [2], delete lines 20, beginning with the word “Generally”, through line
125
35, ending with the word “request”.
-7-
126
127
128
Rule 6.2
In line 2, delete the word “tribunal” and insert the word “court”.
Rule 7.1
129
In line 3, delete the comma and the word “non-verifiable” and insert the word “or”
130
between the words “false” and “misleading”.
131
Rule 7.2
132
At the end of line 5, insert “A lawyer shall not seek employment in connection
133
with matters in which the lawyer or law firm does not intend to actively participate
134
in the representation, but that the lawyer or law firm intends to refer to other
135
counsel, except that this provision shall not apply to organizations listed in Rule
136
7.2 (b)(2) and (3) or if the advertisement is in furtherance of the transactions
137
described in Rule 1.17.”
138
Rule 7.4
139
After line 12, insert a new Division: “(d) a lawyer engaged in trademark practice
140
before the United States Patent and Trademark Office may use the designation
141
‘Trademark’, ‘Trademark Attorney’ or a substantially similar designation.”
142
In line 12, delete “(d)” and insert “(e)”.
143
In Comment [2], line 30, insert “and (d)” after “(c)”. In line 31, insert “and
144
Trademark” after “admiralty”. In line 31, delete “maritime” and in line 32, delete
145
“commerce and”.
146
147
Rule 7.5
In line 4, delete “firm name”.
-8-
148
In Comment [1], at line 30, after “nonlawyer”, insert, “A lawyer or law firm may
149
also be designated by a distinctive website address or comparable professional
150
designation.”
151
In Comment [4], in line 44, delete “Practitioners” and insert, “lawyers”.
152
Rule 8.1
153
Delete the proposed rule in its entirety and substitute therefor:
154
“An applicant for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with a bar
155
admission application or in connection with a disciplinary matter, shall not:
156
(a) knowingly make a false statement of material fact; or
157
(b) fail to disclose a fact necessary to correct a misapprehension known by the
158
person to have arisen in the matter, or knowingly fail to respond to a lawful
159
demand for information from an admissions or disciplinary authority, except that
160
this rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule
161
1.6.
162
Delete the proposed Comment in its entirety and substitute therefor:
163
“[1] The duty imposed by this Rule extends to persons seeking admission to the
164
bar as well as to lawyers. Hence, if a person makes a material false statement in
165
connection with an application for admission, it may be the basis for subsequent
166
disciplinary action if the person is admitted, and in any event may be relevant in a
167
subsequent admission application. The duty imposed by this Rule applies to a
168
lawyer's own admission or discipline as well as that of others. Thus, it is a
-9-
169
separate professional offense for a lawyer to knowingly make a
170
misrepresentation or omission in connection with a disciplinary investigation of
171
the lawyer's own conduct. Paragraph (b) of this Rule also requires correction of
172
any prior misstatement in the matter that the applicant or lawyer may have made
173
and affirmative clarification of any misunderstanding on the part of the
174
admissions or disciplinary authority of which the person involved becomes
175
aware.
176
[2] This Rule is subject to the provisions of the fifth amendment of the United
177
States Constitution and corresponding provisions of state constitutions. A person
178
relying on such a provision in response to a question, however, should do so
179
openly and not use the right of nondisclosure as a justification for failure to
180
comply with this Rule.
181
[3] A lawyer representing an applicant for admission to the bar, or representing a
182
lawyer who is the subject of a disciplinary inquiry or proceeding, is governed by
183
the rules applicable to the client-lawyer relationship, including Rule 1.6 and, in
184
some cases, Rule 3.3.”
185
186
Rule 8.2
In line 4, delete “judicial officer” and insert “judge or magistrate”.
- 10 -
187
Rule 8.3
188
Delete Divisions (a) and (b), lines 2 through 8, and substitute therefor the
189
following:
190
“(a) A lawyer who possesses unprivileged knowledge that another lawyer has
191
committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a
192
substantial question as to that lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a
193
lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.
194
(b) A lawyer who possesses unprivileged knowledge that a judge or magistrate
195
has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a
196
substantial question as to the judge's or magistrate’s fitness for office shall inform
197
the appropriate authority.”
198
Delete the proposed Comment in its entirety and substitute therefor:
199
“[1] Self-regulation of the legal profession requires that members of the
200
profession initiate disciplinary investigation when they possess unprivileged
201
knowledge of a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Lawyers have a
202
similar obligation with respect to judicial misconduct. An apparently isolated
203
violation may indicate a pattern of misconduct that only a disciplinary
204
investigation can uncover. Reporting a violation is especially important where the
205
victim is unlikely to discover the offense.
206
[2] [Reserved]
- 11 -
207
[3] If a lawyer were obliged to report every violation of the Rules, the failure to
208
report any violation would itself be a professional offense. Such a requirement
209
existed in many jurisdictions but proved to be unenforceable. This Rule limits the
210
reporting obligation to those offenses that a self-regulating profession must
211
vigorously endeavor to prevent. A measure of judgment is, therefore, required in
212
complying with the provisions of this Rule. The term "substantial" refers to the
213
seriousness of the possible offense and not the quantum of evidence of which
214
the lawyer is aware. A report should be made to the bar disciplinary agency
215
unless some other agency, such as a peer review agency, is more appropriate in
216
the circumstances. Similar considerations apply to the reporting of judicial
217
misconduct.
218
[4] The duty to report professional misconduct does not apply to a lawyer
219
retained to represent a lawyer whose professional conduct is in question. Such a
220
situation is governed by the Rules applicable to the client-lawyer relationship.
221
[5] Information about a lawyer's or judge's misconduct or fitness may be received
222
by a lawyer in the course of that lawyer's participation in an approved lawyers or
223
judges assistance program. In that circumstance, providing for an exception to
224
the reporting requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Rule encourages
225
lawyers and judges to seek treatment through such a program. Conversely,
226
without such an exception, lawyers and judges may hesitate to seek assistance
227
from these programs, which may then result in additional harm to their
228
professional careers and additional injury to the welfare of clients and the public.
- 12 -
229
These Rules do not otherwise address the confidentiality of information received
230
by a lawyer or judge participating in an approved lawyers’ assistance program;
231
such an obligation, however, may be imposed by the rules of the program or
232
other law.”
233
Rule 8.4
234
In line 5, delete the word “illegal” and insert the word “criminal”.
235
Delete lines 17 and 18.
236
In line 27, delete the word “illegal” and insert the word “criminal”.
237
Preamble
238
Insert the following as Comment [7] at line 48:
239
“[7] Many of a lawyer's professional responsibilities are prescribed in the Ohio
240
Rules of Professional Conduct, as well as substantive and procedural law.
241
However, a lawyer is also guided by personal conscience and the approbation of
242
professional peers. A lawyer should strive to attain the highest level of skill, to
243
improve the law and the legal profession and to exemplify the legal profession's
244
ideals of public service.”
245
246
247
Rule 1.0
In Comment [6] delete the reference to Rule 1.2(c) at line 114.
Minority Report
- 13 -
248
249
250
The Council of Delegates also voted to submit, but not approve, a minority report
on Rules 1.2 and 1.5; that report follows.
Rules 1.2 and 1.5, as proposed by the task force, mandate that a lawyer confirm,
251
in writing, both the scope of the representation of the client and the agreement
252
concerning the fees and expenses the lawyer will charge the client. The rule mandates
253
that the lawyer confirm these matters, in writing, within a reasonable time after
254
commencing the representation.
255
256
A minority of the OSBA subcommittee believe the Supreme Court of Ohio should
adopt the rule as proposed by the task force.
257
Still other members of the subcommittee, also in the minority, believe the
258
Supreme Court of Ohio should increase the amount of fee that triggers the requirement
259
in Rule 1.2 as proposed by the task force to confirm, in writing, the scope of
260
representation and the agreement concerning the fees and expenses the lawyer will
261
charge the client. Those members believe the Supreme Court of Ohio should change
262
the amount from $500.00 to a substantially higher amount, such as $2,500.00.
- 14 -
Download