פרשת כי תבוא As we approach the Torah’s conclusion, Sefer D’vorim continues to provide us with additional mitzvos that are particularly appropriate to it. As Ramban has told us at the beginning of this book, Mishneh Torah has a particular focus on Mitzvos Ha’t’lu’yos Bo’oretz, those precepts that are fulfilled in connection with land. Such “landed” mitzvos belong uniquely to Eretz Yisroel and therefore are particularly befitting for this Sefer which immediately precedes the entry of ‘Am Yisroel to Eretz Yisroel. The two opening Mitzvos seem to be particularly related in many aspects to this purpose and to each other. The Torah tells us first (Perek 26/Psukim 1-11) of the Mitzva of Bikkurim, taking the first of the produce of “Peiros she’nish’tab’cho bo’hem ho’oretz”, wheat, barley, grapes, figs, pomegranates, olives and dates (Perek 8/Posuk ), to the Beis HaMikdosh, to the officiating Kohen. We are told that the bringing of these Bikkurim is accompanied by a particular recital (P’sukim 5-10), referred to as Mikra Bikkurim, that gives expression to the Mitzva being fulfilled. The second section is called “Bi’ur Ma’asros”. Literally, this means disposing (according to Rambam it means “destroying”) any non-distributed types of ma’aser from your possession. Since there are two mini-cycles (years 1-3 and 4-6) for distributing ma’asros during the seven year Shmitta cycle there is an obligation of “bi’ur” at the end of each of those cycles. On Erev Pesach of the fourth and seventh (this coming Shmitta year) the landowner must remove any undistributed tithing from his ownership. Thus, if he owes Ma’aser Rishon to the Levi (from years 1-3 or 4-6) of the mini-cycle), Ma’aser Sheni (from years 1 and 2 or 4 and 5)) to be taken and eaten in Yerushalayim, or Ma’aser ‘Oni (from the third or sixth year) to be given to the impoverished, he must pay his debts or fulfill his obligations immediately. This is in keeping with what is written in Parshas R’eh (Perek14/Posuk 28), “Mik’tzei sho’losh shonim to’tzi es kol ma’asar t’vu’o’s’cho ba’shonoh ha’hi.” At the end of three years take out all the tithing of your produce in that year. This Mitzva also has an accompanying recitation, appropriate for its purpose which is called Vidui Ma’asros, the “confession” of the tithing. After the initial study, further in-depth contemplation makes the initial similarities pale in comparison to the differences between these two Mitzvos. First, the act of bringing Bikkurim is the very first step in dealing with the Mitzvos Ha’t’lu’yos Bo’oretz. Since the first of the annual “gifts” is Bikkurim, that inaugurates the yearly cycle, and the beginning of the yearly cycles, themselves. Bi’ur Ma’asros, on the other hand, completes the cycle, dealing with the final gifts from the final harvests after the mini cycle has been completed. The complete act of Bikkurim is located in Beis HaMikdosh. “V’holachto el ha’mokom asher yivchar Hashem E’lo’kecho l’sha’kein sh’mo shom”(Posuk 2). The bringing of the fruits and the declaration must all take place there. Bi’ur ma’asros, on the other hand takes place at home. There one checks one’s household and one’s accounts. There, and only there, can one be sure that, whether through design or oversight, errors can be corrected. True, the Torah says that the “vidui” is recited “lifnei Hashem E-lo-kecho (Posuk 13), but that is only part of the observance, not its entirety. The most significance contrast can be found, perhaps, in the different styles of the recitations. Of course, the recitations will be different. Each has its own subject and thus the content of each will be inherently different. Nonetheless there is a contrast in style implies important differences that must be understood. Mikra Bikkurim, in its entirety, is a statement referring to the nation of Israel. Familiar to us from the Haggada Shel Pesach, we remember how all the verses are said in the plural, referring to the history of B’nei Yisroel in which the landowner determinedly makes him a part. He begins, “Arami oveid o’vi” (Posuk 5), describing the descent into Egypt, and then, “Va’yo’rei’u o’sonu” (Posuk 6) describing the hardships we endured there. The recitation continues, “Va’yo’tzi’einu Hashem mi’Mitzrayim” (Posuk 8) describing the Exodus that was experienced together by ‘Am Yisroel and “Va’y’vi’einu” (Posuk 9) telling how Hashem brought us to Eretz Yisroel. The landowner, through his words, does not see himself alone, separate and distinct, but as an integral part of K’lal Yisroel. The Torah then promises a blessing to this individual, as such. “V’so’machto v’chol ha’tov…u’l’vei’secho…” (Posuk 11). You (singular!) will rejoice with the all the good Hashem has bestowed upon you and your household. Thus Mikra Bikkurim is noted for the fact that its content is national and the concluding blessing is more personal and particular. Now, look at Viddui Ma’asros. The recitation is all in the singular and personal. “Bi’arti ha’Kodesh min ha’Bayis” (Posuk 13). I have ridded the sanctified ma’aser from my house. “Lo o’chal’ti v’oni mimenu” (Posuk 14). I did not violate its holiness by partaking of it as a mourner. “Shoma’ti b’kol Hashem E-lokoi” (ibid.). I hearkened to the voice of Hashem, my G-d. All is in the singular. All is personal and individual. The conclusion of Vidui Ma’asros has a different type of conclusion, though. The reader turns to HaKodosh Boruch Hu and recites the poignant verse: “Hashkifa mim’on kodsh’cho min ha’sho’mayim u’vorech as ‘am’cho es Yisroel v’eis ho’adomo a’sher nosato lonu, ka’asher nishba’to la’a’voseinu e’retz zovas cholov u’dvash”(Posuk 15). Look down, Hashem, from your holy abode, from the heavens and bless your people Israel and the land You gave us, like you vowed to our ancestors, a land flowing with milk and honey. This Parsha is almost the opposite of that which preceded it. Here the individual is in the center for almost its entirety. However, its conclusion, its finale, asks, in magnificent tones, that all of Israel, and its land, be completely blessed. Two sections seem so perfectly matched, but when viewed with greater scrutiny their differences call many questions to the fore. The time of bringing Bikkurim was certainly a period of great joy. The ground, the trees and the vines have begun to give forth their bounty. The landowner looks forward with great anticipation to the wealth that his property will bring him. It is not surprising that the ceremony of bringing Bikkurim to Beis HaMikdash was ornate. Masseches Bikkurim tells us of the vessels laden with the new produce, decorated and bejewelled, the animals decorated and the overall festive atmosphere. Undoubtedly, he was thinking of the vacation he could take with his family, remodeling his house or expanding his property. At that moment the landowner is very much self-centered. It is at that point that the Torah commands him to rise above his own personal interests and have a view that extends beyond his parochial needs. View the history of your people. Do not see yourself as isolated and alone. Know that there is that which is past your own needs and goes beyond them. If, in the midst of his personal simcha, he who brings Bikkurim is able to give voice to the peoplehood of ‘Am Yisroel and not only his own needs, he deserves the audience in Beis HaMikdash. He is worthy to bring his produce their and make his proclamation before Hashem. When he reaches such a level he then receives the personal blessing that comes at the end of the section. It is not what he originally thought that the blessing of his bounty came about because of his own hard work or good luck. It is because he is part of ‘Am Yisroel and Hashem has blessed His people and as part of that people he, too, is blessed. Bi’ur Ma’asros is quite distinct from Bikkurim. Almost three years have past since the initial exuberance of Bikkurim. The vagaries of the weather, pestilence and the prices on the open market might have done much to damper the initial enthusiasm that was felt. And, even if all of his expectations were met, the landowner was reminded clearly during these past three years that all was not his. In addition to the few fruits of Bikkurim and the 2 percent given to Truma, and additional large sum of almost 20 percent had to be dedicated to the Levi, to be taken to Yerushalayim or to be given to the poor. These constant deductions certainly proved a challenge to our farmer. From the onset his profits were lowered tremendously. If there were national taxes, payments to the King or to the municipality, they cut into his profits as well. Beyond the payments, the Torah says it is not sufficient merely to pay. There are Mitzvos that guide and limit the individual, even when giving what he is commanded. Rashi points out the various halachos that are contained within the vidui-confession that is recited. Yes, this recitation is self-centered. However its focus is not self-aggrandizement. Rather it emphasizes that in spite of his largesse in giving, he was also limited and proscribed. If the vidui is recited properly, reminding him of his obligations not of his charity, then he truly knows his place among ‘Am Yisroel and before HaKodosh Boruch Hu. At this point he not only deserves to receive Hashem’s bracha, as the one who brought Bikkurim properly, he can also bestow his own blessing. He can turn to Hashem and ask that blessings be given to all the people Israel of whom he is a most faithful representative. Shabbat Shalom Ksiva Vachasima Tova Rabbi Pollock