Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Module 7 Conflict Resolution Federal Emergency Management Agency United States Fire Administration National Fire Academy Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Course at a Glance 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Introduction and Overview Stress Management Time Management Interpersonal Communications Motivation Counseling Conflict Resolution Group Dynamics Learning Objectives At the end of this module, the students will be able to explain the importance of conflict resolution and the processes which can be used to achieve it. To achieve this objective, the students will: Conflict Resolution 1) Describe the nature and potential results of conflict. 2) Identify the sources of conflict. 3) Describe styles of conflict resolution. 4) Explain suggested steps in conflict resolution. 173 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Another characteristic of being a successful supervisor is managing conflict effectively. According to the Schmidt and Thomas survey conducted for the American Management Association (AMA), managers spend approximately 20 percent of their time dealing with some form of organizational conflict. Conflict is an inescapable part of both our personal and professional daily lives. Each of us has our own ideas, opinions, and needs and, at times, they probably will clash with the ideas, opinions, and needs of another. The challenge is to resolve those conflicts so that neither the people nor the organization suffers. Nature of Conflict One dictionary defines conflict as a "clash or divergence of opinions, interests; a mental or moral struggle occasioned by incompatible desires, aims, etc." Charles Lickson in his book, Ironing it Out: Seven Simple Steps to Resolving Conflict, defines conflict as "that feeling or condition which occurs whenever you face an unpleasant situation created by you or someone else.'' Applying this to my situation… Write your own definition of conflict. Is conflict positive or negative? What makes you think that? Note two situations that you would label as representing conflict. Literature regarding conflict says that it can occur in any endeavor that requires the input of two or more people. It can be positive or negative, and can manifest itself in many ways and places. It is not seen as a struggle between absolutes such as right and wrong or good and evil. Conflict is, in fact, a natural result of people working together. A first step in resolving conflict, whether in the workplace or your personal life, is to accept that fact. Left unmanaged, conflict can result in back biting, bickering among coworkers, anger, stress, mediocrity, complacency, and even illness. Whether the effect of conflict is good or bad depends on the strategies used to manage it. The presence of conflict suggests a Conflict Resolution 174 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide need for change or adjustment. Resolving conflict effectively requires paying attention to the needs of the parties involved and if not improving, at least not damaging, their relationship. There are many positive or functional outcomes of conflict: produces better ideas; helps people clarify their ideas; lessens workplace tensions; addresses long-standing problems; stimulates interest and creativity; tests people’s capacities; improves employee relationships; examines current practices; offers a discussion forum; enhances productivity; considers different perspectives; and helps people grow and change. As we indicated earlier, conflict can be positive or negative. There are also several negative or dysfunctional outcomes of conflict: makes people feel defeated; adds distance between people; creates resistance to teamwork; may cause people to leave because of turmoil; diverts energy from activities; polarizes and divides teams; fosters a climate of distrust and suspicion; and often leads to no decision. Applying this to my situation… Recall a conflict that you believe has been resolved, and cite one positive and one negative outcome of that resolution. Positive: Negative: List specific benefits you think you would gain from sharpening your conflict resolution skills. Conflict Resolution 175 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Resolving conflict requires three basic steps. The first is to recognize the situation at hand; the second involves assessing the nature of the conflict; and the third requires taking action to resolve it. We will begin by examining how to recognize conflict. Diagnosing Conflict There are some basic assumptions regarding interactions between people that should be kept in mind throughout this discussion. Human beings, because of who they are, can have different interpretations of the same circumstances. Also, in human interaction, nothing is obvious, and simplicity does not mean unimportance. We noted that the first step in resolving conflict is to recognize the situation at hand. A supervisor can find out about conflict via three general methods. One way is to observe discontent between two parties, or other symptoms of conflict. The items on the list below can suggest that a person is experiencing conflict. Keep in mind that these items also could be evidence of some other problem. Observing them should cause one to investigate further. A person struggling with conflict: displays no desire to communicate; gets angry for no apparent reason; decreases productivity; suffers morale problems; frequently calls in sick; is prone to accidents; and cannot handle disagreements and ends up shouting, slamming doors. A second method of becoming aware of conflict is for one or both parties involved to complain to a third person, often the supervisor. The last method is for a third party to point out conflict existing between individuals. Sources of Conflict Once one becomes aware that conflict exists, one should try to determine the source of the conflict. Knowing the source can have an effect on the resolution. Here are several of the common sources of conflict. Values People come to work with a set of values they have developed based on their experiences related to religion, family, education, culture, and so forth. If a situation involves values, conflict can arise because of value differences. For example, does one person value hard work and another attempt to do as little as possible? Conflict Resolution 176 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Perception All people do not view the world in the same way. Even given the same information, they may not interpret the situation or problem similarly; that difference in perception can be important. Whether a person sees the glass as half empty or as half full makes a big difference. Knowledge A person working with inaccurate or incomplete information may respond to circumstances very differently than one who has complete and accurate data and understanding. Even fear of the unknown can lead to conflict for an individual. When an officer is not aware that the fire has extended to the back of a building, conflict could arise when someone requests a second alarm. Feelings Some people simply do not like each other because they do not have the same personality type or the same interests. In addition, resentment could be left over from a previous encounter, betrayal, or frustration. Most people probably have worked with someone who is irritating. Resources When any resources are in short supply and people must compete for them, conflict can result. If one thinks suppression, hazardous materials, prevention, training, EMS, or some other division is getting the resources it needs, conflict could be generated. Methodology Each person may have a different idea regarding the "best" way to complete a task. People do not always agree on what the acceptable standards to complete certain tasks are. Or people may get somewhat envious or upset if the "right" person is not performing a task. Needs As discussed in Module 5: Motivation, each person is at a certain point in development and is looking for certain things. If one’s current need is for power and control, there could be conflict if someone else’s need is the same. Goals Part of being a supervisor is to focus the team on common goals. Bringing about that result may be easier in some circumstances than in others. A team would likely agree Conflict Resolution 177 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide that a primary goal is to confine the fire to the room of origin, rather than to prevent every fire from occurring. Roles Differences of opinion sometimes develop between superiors and subordinates about job priorities, job behavior, responses to demands, etc. Both parties may disagree on whether any officer can be assigned to be "command" at a large incident or only a chief officer. Applying this to my situation… Review your work situation and identify three potential sources of conflict. For each one, explain the type of conflict and why it could arise. 1. 2. 3. In addition to the examples noted above, there are circumstances that can lead to conflict in emergency service organizations. Take, for instance, the characterizations of "Old Guard" versus "Young Turks." The Old Guard could include anyone who wanted to protect the "status quo," and the Young Turks could include anyone who wanted to change the "status quo." Another area of conflict could be between union and management. The goals and objectives of these two groups may appear to be incompatible at times. Line versus staff conflicts can occur if staff personnel attempt to implement new methods that managers do not support. Were any of these examples on your list? As noted in the preceding information, there can be various levels of conflict within an organization. Intrapersonal conflict means conflict that occurs within a person. It can occur when the individual is asked to perform certain tasks or roles which do not match his/her expertise, interests, goals, or values. This type of conflict can be one of the most severe a person can face. Interpersonal conflict occurs between two or more people who may be at the same level or different levels within an organization. If conflict is occurring among members of a group or between two or more subgroups within a group, it is referred to as intragroup conflict. Intergroup conflict happens between two or more groups within an organization. Successful conflict resolution Conflict Resolution 178 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide requires that one keep in mind the two aspects of any conflict: the perception of facts and the emotional feeling, interpretation, and values of the parties involved. Conflict Stages The last concept regarding conflict diagnosis is to recognize the stages of a conflict. Most conflicts go through four clearly identifiable stages from inception to resolution. A description of the four stages follows. Stage 1: Frustration This occurs when someone or something is blocking an individual or group from obtaining a desired goal or objective. The source or reason for the frustration may be well- or ill-defined at this stage. Nevertheless, an individual or group is feeling thwarted about not getting the desired result(s). A fire service manager may be attempting to implement a change in agency policies and procedures that requires the support of subordinates. After a period of time elapses, the manager might begin to feel frustrated because there is no satisfactory progress in implementation. This frustration may increase if that manager cannot really pinpoint why the changes are not occurring. Stage 2: Conceptualization This helps the manager answer the question, "What is the real problem?" The manager makes attempts to clarify the nature and scope of the problem causing frustration. Maybe staff is resisting new policies and procedures because they feel that they did not have sufficient opportunity to provide input. Stage 3: Behavior This refers to taking some action to deal with the conceptualized conflict. Several options are probably available to resolve the conflict. We will look at them later. Stage 4: Outcome This occurs when the dust has settled. People usually resolve most conflicts. At this stage, the manager can assess the quality of the attempted conflict resolution approach. Applying this to my situation… Recall a recent conflict which you observed or in which you were a party. Note what occurred that fits each conflict stage described above. Frustration: Conceptualization: Behavior: Outcome: Conflict Resolution 179 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Understanding the typical evolution of a conflict can enable one to approach such a situation rationally. The next section will examine some of the factors important to resolving conflict successfully. Resolving Conflict As we noted earlier, feelings can be an important reason why conflicts occur. Managing those feelings may be a critical factor in resolving the conflict. Some, but not most, conflicts need immediate intervention. If there is intense emotion involved, no attempt to resolve the conflict should occur until the emotions have subsided. There are things one can do to help defuse the situation. Defusion refers to the reduction of emotional tension and explosiveness potentially surrounding a conflict situation. Here are some techniques to resolve conflict. Make your presence known. Just acknowledging that someone is observing the situation may cause the parties to restrain their behavior. Allow the venting of strong vocal emotion, if present, to continue for a short time. It can help take the edge off emotions and allow you to learn something about the reason for the conflict. Move disagreeing parties out of eye contact and earshot, if feasible. High emotion builds tension and breeds upon itself. Separating the parties can reduce communication and decrease emotional turmoil temporarily. After the parties have calmed down, bring them back together. Deliberately lowering the volume of your voice can have a calming effect. Those in conflict will need to quiet down to hear what someone else is saying. Get the parties to sit down. It is difficult to become or remain highly volatile in a seated position. Even if parties refuse to sit down at first, you should sit down. Those in conflict will find it difficult to continue the disagreement standing up while someone is sitting down and observing them. Distract the parties by taking out paper and pencil, asking simple questions, or by making a distracting observation ("Did I hear the phone?"). Offer a sign of hospitality such as a cup of coffee or glass of water. Doing so can divert their attention from one another or from the issue. It also can help to establish rapport. Use your communication skills. Listen actively, acknowledge the legitimacy of feelings, share your own feelings, and provide feedback. Conflict Resolution 180 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide In any situation, it is likely a combination of these will need to be used. The more tense the conflict situation, the greater the likelihood that one will need to use more, rather than fewer, techniques. Applying this to my situation… Have you ever defused a highly emotional situation or seen someone else do it? If so, which of the above techniques did you observe? The techniques described above have proved effective in de-escalating intense emotion. They represent only a few of the many possibilities available. Keep in mind that each individual is unique and each situation is different. Not every one of these techniques is appropriate to every situation and some may not work in a given situation. When confronted with a highly emotional conflict, use one or a combination until you find something that works. Conflict Resolution Styles Actually resolving a conflict usually is undertaken based on the use of one of five basic styles. It is important to identify one’s own conflict resolution style. Generally speaking, we tend to prefer one or two styles for managing conflict. In selecting a way to approach a given conflict and to achieve maximum effectiveness, it is necessary to examine your preferred style and see if it is appropriate. There are pluses and minuses to using a given style in a particular situation. We will describe the five conflict management styles to help you better understand them. The Avoider Some people use the avoider style to manage conflict. One may find conflict particularly uncomfortable, so one withdraws or does anything and everything to avoid it. One may even abandon certain work-related goals or retreat from some relationships to avoid friction. Sometimes a person uses an avoider style simply because he/she has failed to develop the skills to manage conflict successfully. Conflict Resolution 181 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Other times, an avoider is operating with the philosophy of "see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil.'' This style can, however, be useful in situations like these: when the issue is trivial; when one is without power; when a confrontation could be damaging; when one needs time to cool off or gather information; when the issue is a symptom of other problems; and when others can resolve the conflict more effectively. The avoider style is not a good strategy if the conflict festers, if people do not find permanent resolution, or if they allow decisions by default. The Controller Another style is the controller. When one is in a conflict, one often tries to overpower opponents and force them into accepting one’s viewpoint. An authoritarian pursues personal interests at the expense of the other side and dominates others by not acknowledging or fully comprehending their needs. In the process of getting their own way, the controlling types may poison relationships and leave a legacy of bitterness. A conflict resolution based on an authoritarian style may backfire because it omits key needs. However, sometimes this style is the only practical approach. In emergencies, there is no time to consider every opinion. At other times, someone has to enforce unpopular decisions, there is no other alternative, or one is convinced of the correctness of the decision. Applying this to my situation… Recall a situation where you avoided a conflict and briefly explain the circumstances. Why did you use this style? Was using this style successful? Describe a situation where someone used a controlling style to resolve a conflict. Did you feel this was the best way to manage the situation? Conflict Resolution 182 Why? Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide The Accommodator To the accommodator, relationships are important and this person wants to be accepted and liked. One may express personal views but then sacrifice them to meet the needs of someone else. This style can be useful when the issue is minor but important to the other person, when one realizes that one is wrong or outmatched, when one wants to store up points for important issues in the future, or to give subordinates a chance to learn from mistakes. Using this style is not appropriate if there is too much self-sacrifice. If one says "yes" just to keep the peace when one really feels "no," one may end up resentful. The Compromiser Both goals and relationships are important to this person, so one seeks the middle ground in a conflict. Compromising involves give and take or sharing whereby both parties give up something to reach a mutually acceptable decision. It may be useful when both sides have equal power and are immovably attached to mutually exclusive goals; a meeting in the middle is better than no agreement at all. Compromising also may be useful to gain a temporary settlement, but it may not be effective in the long run because neither side's needs are fully met. The Collaborator The fifth style of conflict resolution is that of the collaborator. Conflicts appear as problems needing a solution and the best solution is one that benefits all the parties. Collaborating requires skill and practice, openness, an honest exchange of information, and attentive listening. This style is useful to harmonize concerns of each side that are too important to compromise, to merge insights from people with diverse perspectives, to build a team, or to increase commitment to a solution. The primary drawback of collaborating is that it requires a lot of time and effort. Applying this to my situation… After reviewing all of the styles, what do you think is your predominant style? What consequences have resulted from your using this style? Describe one situation that had a negative result. Which style do you think would have worked better? Conflict Resolution 183 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide These style descriptions are not precise and absolute. Some people blend styles, and others use different styles depending upon the context. The challenge is to choose the style or blend appropriate to each situation. The more approaches one can use effectively, the better chance one will have of resolving conflicts. Selecting the right style is important, but so are developing conflict resolution skills and understanding the principles that support an effective process. We will examine these next. Conflict Resolution Skills Getting involved or trying to help others resolve conflicts is tricky business. It requires skills that do not always come naturally to supervisors. The good news is that one can learn or develop the necessary skills. Four skills considered especially necessary are listening, questioning, communicating, and mediating. Listening Conflicts remain unresolved until all parties feel someone has listened to them and both parties have reached a point where they can listen to each other. In Module 4: Interpersonal Communications, we discussed active listening. It simply means paying strict attention to all speakers, asking appropriate questions for clarity, double-checking understanding, and letting speakers know that they have been heard. One cannot listen actively if one is planning what to say next. Here are four specific skills one can use to improve active listening. Maintain direct eye contact with the speaker. People tend to feel one is really listening when one looks them in the eye. Doing so also helps one to pay attention. One should give as much eye contact as one gets in return. Restate or rephrase what one hears. This is a good way to confirm understanding, to show the speaker that one is listening, and to encourage the speaker to continue. Listen for the feelings behind the words. The real message may not be stated in conflict situations. One needs to look and listen for subtle clues as to what is really happening. Feelings flush out meaning, but one needs to confirm them and check them for accuracy. Summarize what one has heard when the speaker is finished. This keeps the listener honest and assures the speakers that someone has truly heard and understood the message. It also gives the speaker one more opportunity to add details and correct any false perceptions. Conflict Resolution 184 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Questioning The second conflict resolution skill is questioning. Good questions can help all the parties involved to begin to understand what is happening, the root of the problem, why people feel the way they do, and what it might take to resolve or settle the problem. There are two aspects to effective questioning. First, one should avoid asking loaded or leading questions. Any questions that are biased or hint at only one correct answer can make a person feel manipulated. Such questions give the impression that the asker is trying to impose values or solutions instead of helping the parties reach a settlement. Secondly, it is important to ask open-ended questions. Those questions that require only a ''yes or no" answer are not very useful in resolving conflicts. Ask questions which encourage the parties to reveal more information and underlying causes, effects, and feelings. This added input can open up more possibilities and often leads to more viable solutions to conflicts. Applying this to my situation… Write an example of a leading question that you have used or one that has been used on you. What effect did the question have? List three effective open-ended questions. Are any of these questions on your list? How do you feel about . . .? What do you mean? What if . . .? What do you think about . . .? How would you change things? What do you want to happen? Can you elaborate on . . .? Why? As one can see, these questions require more than a yes or no answer and, if answered honestly, they could provide valuable input to the resolution process. Conflict Resolution 185 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Communicating We spent some time in Module 4 discussing nonverbal and paraverbal communication. We need to remember that sometimes actions speak louder than words. One can use body language, voice tone and volume, and pauses to put the parties at ease, to demonstrate interest, and to reinforce your willingness to find a resolution. By being able to read nonverbal and paraverbal communication, one may discover clues as to what the parties are really saying and feeling. Mediating Finding win-win solutions to conflict situations requires one to be more than a fixer or enforcer. Higher level people skills and the characteristics of a mediator are important. Here are a few of these traits. open-mindedness, having no bias or preset opinions; capacity to demonstrate empathy and sensitivity; ability to accept all feelings as honest and valid; flexibility and resiliency; objectivity and ability to depersonalize situations; neutrality, the ability to avoid taking sides or jumping to conclusions; patience and willingness to hear all sides without interruption; respect for confidentiality; and credibility and integrity. By developing skills in the areas of listening, questioning, communicating, and mediating, a supervisor is prepared to intervene and to help resolve conflicts better. Before we discuss actual conflict resolution processes, we will review some general principles to apply in those situations. Applying this to my situation… Recall a situation in which you helped resolve a conflict. What conflict resolution skills just described did you rely on most? If you had to do it over, would you change your approach, based on what you have read here? Conflict Resolution 186 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Conflict Resolution Principles Communicating in "normal" circumstances sometimes can be difficult so one can imagine how conflict can affect it. However, there are steps a person can take to manage a conflict situation and improve the potential for resolution. In the book Getting to Yes, Fisher and Ury outline four key principles useful in conflict resolution: separate the people from the problem; focus on interests, not positions; generate a variety of options before deciding; and seek objective standards. Other sources offer additional thoughts. We will discuss some of these other views. Effective conflict resolution requires that all of the parties involved be part of the final solution. It must be a "we-we,'' not an "I-versus-you" situation. It is critical to establish a helpful and respectful tone so that all parties know their input is important. This also helps preserve the dignity of all stakeholders. It is equally important to establish ground rules that include no name-calling, verbal putdowns, or profanity. Commitment to active listening is another principle of conflict resolution. Parties must concentrate on what others are saying, provide feedback, try to understand others, look at the speaker, paraphrase what they hear, and try not to interrupt. Acknowledging and agreeing are not the same thing. By acknowledging the feelings and input of others, the door is open to work toward agreement. Those involved need to handle their own feelings and encourage others to do the same. Impulsive behavior can lead to poor decisionmaking. "Self-talk" can help manage feelings. It involves knowing that one is getting upset and telling oneself to calm down. Taking two or three deep breaths can help with relaxation. Even speaking slowly or saying something positive can help a person relax. One needs to communicate with respect and empathy. Another principle is to separate wants from needs. All parties in the conflict must understand and reflect what really matters to them. Fisher and Ury talk about interests and positions. An interest is a general concern for which a number of positions might be appropriate. A position is a specific solution to a problem. Having a representative of one’s work group on a grievance committee is an interest or need. Insisting that a particular person represent this same group is a position. If people can learn to present the interest rather than the position, they will find that more solutions may result and perhaps a better solution, as well. It is important to identify and focus on issues central to the conflict and not to compromise too quickly. One should not try to solve several problems at one time. By focusing on one problem at a time, it is easier to generate a variety of solutions, adequately examine them, and select the best solution. The value of diverse opinions is that alternative views can generate rich ideas and creative possibilities. Conflict Resolution 187 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide In some circumstances, the best solution is to use an objective standard that does not represent the interests of one side or the other. The use of a national code as a standard to resolve a local code issue would be one example of doing that. Given all of this background, we finally get to the process of resolving conflict. Using a step-by-step technique can make the process go more smoothly. Applying this to my situation… Go back to the same situation you recalled in the previous exercise. List three or four of the principles just discussed that you feel were operative in this conflict resolution. Conflict Resolution Process Various "experts" offer different methods to solve a conflict or any other type of problem. Even though they may not be exactly alike, they do have elements in common and nearly all suggest moving from one step to the next systematically. Applying this to my situation… Do you often use (or see others use) a step-by-step process to resolve a conflict or solve a problem? If not, why? List five steps you believe would be useful in resolving conflicts and/or solving other types of problems. Conflict Resolution 188 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide If you have used or observed an effective conflict resolution process, the information below may reinforce that option. If you have no preferred method, consider adopting or adapting the one described. It has six basic steps. Planning and Preparation One should try to assess likely sources of disagreement and anticipate potential conflicts before they become heated. If one becomes aware of a conflict, one should think about the time and energy one is willing to devote to its resolution. It is important to give some thought to one's viewpoints and feelings about the issues. Recognizing one's usual style of handling conflict and also considering the best style or combination of styles to use for this particular conflict will be helpful. One should think about possible solutions, but not lock oneself into a rigid view of what the solution should be. It is essential to move ahead with a positive and open mind. Setting the Tone It is essential to identify all of the persons with a vested interest in the outcome of conflict and bring them together. It is best to find a time that is long enough and free from outside distractions to allow for effective communication. The location for the meeting should be a conscious decision unless there is no choice. One should find a place that is positive and promotes being connected rather than divided. It will help to express the wish to resolve the dispute and improve relationships. If one begins by stressing what both sides have to gain from the discussion, this ought to promote motivation and cooperation. Everyone needs to agree on and observe ground rules. Identifying the Real Problem All parties must be willing to discuss their perceptions of the situation and be willing to try to understand the perceptions of others. Everyone should model the desired level of openness and without blame or defensiveness, express their own fears, doubts, and concerns. One cannot assume that one’s own assumptions are correct. It will be important to allow all persons enough time to explain their understanding of the situation and feelings about it. All other parties should listen carefully and ask clarifying questions. Someone needs to restate what the person said and verify whether or not that is correct. Throughout this step, it is important to determine what components the parties feel most strongly about and what parts the group should deal with first. Generating Possible Solutions It will help to develop criteria for a good solution and try to agree on a goal that all of the parties can endorse. All parties may not be able to agree on how to get to that goal, but it is likely they will agree on what it is. The next step is to brainstorm possible ways of reaching that goal without questioning or evaluating any suggestions. It is essential to ensure that each stakeholder participates and is part of the solution. Everyone should Conflict Resolution 189 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide listen actively and ask for clarification, as necessary. Most situations could go in a variety of directions, so the participants should not rule out any suggestions at first. Selecting an Option Once the group has made an adequate list of possible solutions, it is time to look for commonalities in them. This should help narrow the options. If there is a particular solution that a person cannot accept, someone should note that fact and state the reasons for that opinion. Again, the parties can ask for any needed clarification. The parties should look for an option that meets the needs of each person involved and also has the potential of improving the future relationship. No one should dismiss an option simply because of past experience. Since most conflicts are not resolved in one step, everyone should start with an idea all can agree on. It is most productive to select a workable choice. It is essential to document the agreement by developing some concrete ideas for actions. If necessary, the participants can delegate responsibility and involve other parties for approval and implementation. Implementing the Solution The parties should discuss timeframes for implementation and the responsibilities each party has as part of the implementation. All parties serve as caretakers for the welfare of themselves, the other parties, and the relationship. The group should set realistic deadlines if they are important to the solution. Monitoring the solution and finding out if it is adequate for solving the conflict are important steps. The group needs to remember to keep communication lines open and make adjustments as needed. If the solution does not resolve the conflict, someone needs to determine why not and start the process again. Applying this to my situation… Which of the steps described above do you think would be most difficult for you to use? Why? Just as there are skills, principles, and processes that can promote conflict resolution, there are circumstances that can inhibit reaching successful solutions. We need to take a few minutes to discuss some of them. Conflict Resolution 190 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Blocks to Conflict Resolution Most of the barriers that interfere with the constructive resolution of differences relate to a person's attitude and approach. The list of blocks to resolving conflict below is not allinclusive, but it provides some concepts to consider. Rigidity--holding personal views too stubbornly or neglecting to encourage others to express alternative views. Uncertainty--not knowing what one wants or needs; yielding an interest too quickly. Intrusiveness--personally involving oneself in disagreements beyond the point of being helpful; wasting too much time. Aloofness--tending to remain too distant and giving the impression of being uncaring or unconcerned. Egotism--speaking first to one's own needs and causing others to close down and be less receptive to what one says. Surprise--being caught off guard and not taking time to think or plan; one may forget important points or say inappropriate or unproductive things. Bullying--People know when they are being bullied or manipulated and their reaction usually is to resist, shut down, withdraw, fight back, and possibly never trust a person again. Overload--having such strong emotional feelings about a person that one has trouble resolving conflicts or reaching agreements. Invoking past practice--what works in one situation may be disastrous in another. Speeding--one cannot just go through the motions; one must find out what people need and make them feel heard. Conflict Resolution 191 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Applying this to my situation… Select three of the attitudes/approaches described above and recall one situation where you used it or observed someone else using it and what resulted. 1. 2. 3. Effectively diagnosing and resolving conflicts can be one of the most difficult challenges confronting any fire service manager. This module has attempted to explain why conflict exists and how one can improve skills at managing it. Doing a good job will require hard work. Summary One characteristic of being a successful supervisor is knowing how to manage conflict effectively. The challenge is to resolve the conflicts that occur so that neither the people nor the organization suffers. Important concepts to remember regarding conflict resolution are Conflict is an inescapable part of both one's personal and professional daily lives. Left unmanaged, conflict can damage both individuals and organizations. Common sources of conflict are values, perceptions, knowledge, feelings, resources, methodology, needs, goals, and roles. If intense emotion is involved in a conflict, one should try to defuse those emotions before attempting resolution. Five basic styles of conflict resolution are avoiding, controlling, accommodating, compromising, and collaborating. Listening, questioning, communicating, and mediating are all skills necessary for conflict resolution. The steps in conflict resolution include planning and preparation, setting the tone, identifying the problem, generating possible solutions, selecting an option, and implementing the solution. Conflict Resolution 192 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide End-of-Module Activity Conflict is not limited to one or two people or small groups. It can involve large groups, like an entire department. Review the scenario below and do the following: 1. Explain what you think the causes of this conflict are and what style(s) you think would be effective for resolving it. 2. Describe whom you would involve in the conflict resolution process and where and when you would have the parties meet. 3. Once the parties are gathered, explain how you will help them identify the "real" problem. 4. List several possible solutions to resolve this conflict. 5. Select one possible solution from your list and explain why you think it would be effective and who would be involved in implementation. 6. List three steps that would be part of implementing this solution. 7. Describe how you would evaluate the success of the chosen solution. Scenario The relationship between Green Valley and Swanstown has been stormy at best for some time, but recently conflicts have escalated, with a torrent of poor publicity that has been a public relations disaster for both. Conflicts have centered on Swan Acres, a wealthy subdivision in Green Valley's jurisdiction. Swanstown Fire and Rescue has been responding to rescue calls in this area. It possesses a variety of modern equipment (telemetry units, defibrillation packs, and mast trousers, for example) and has an excellent staff of emergency medical personnel. Swan Acres has expressed its appreciation to the unit with substantial financial support. Green Valley, which critically needs financial backing to buy some much needed equipment, has insisted that Swanstown not respond to rescue calls at all. Green Valley personnel dismiss Swanstown's responders as soon as they (Green Valley) are able to arrive, often angrily. In a recent case, there is some question as to whether an onscene argument and temporary cessation of medical efforts endangered a patient's life. A local paper reached a Swanstown EMT immediately after the incident who said, "Green Valley is so incompetent, its units shouldn't be allowed to operate at all." A Green Valley firefighter said in response that Swanstown was "horning in on Green Valley's legal territory to soak its residents for money, which is all they care about." Arguing that "turnabout is fair play," Green Valley has been showing up regularly at fires in Swanstown's New Street area. It has somewhat better highrise equipment than Conflict Resolution 193 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Swanstown and its officers have had more experience in fighting highrise fires. It insists that its personnel should be in charge of fires in which their equipment is used. It is running into opposition from the town board, however, which feels its tax dollars should not be spent on "other people's problems." Swanstown Fire and Rescue Department is highly trained, with a large cadre of young, progressive personnel. Most of its leaders come from politically liberal Swan Acres and have close ties in the community. They feel Swan Acres "deserves the best"--which is the Swanstown Fire and Rescue Department. Green Valley's older, conservative, more experienced leadership feels experience, not "fancy equipment and book learning," spells success. They are keenly conscious of economic factors and do not wish to give up the financial support they feel they could get from Swan Acres if Swanstown would stop competing with them and trying to make them look bad in front of key citizens in their district. Political factors at town and department levels militate against a smooth working relationship, since both towns and departments see themselves as different (in culture and interests), and tend to believe independence is the best way to see their needs are met. The situation has embarrassed both town boards. Both boards have ordered the two departments to get their act together and come up with some feasible suggestions doublequick. They say they are willing to consider any suggestions both sides agree to as long as they don't cost too much. Conflict Resolution 194 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Module 7 Module Review Questions True or False--Circle T or F. T F 1. Conflict is an inescapable part of both our personal and professional daily lives. T F 2. Complacency and mediocrity can be symptoms of unresolved conflict. T F 3. In a conflict between EMS and prevention, feelings would most likely be the source. T F 4. Just belonging to union or management could be the source of conflict in a fire service organization. T F 5. A compromising style of conflict resolution tries to overpower opponents and force them to accept a particular viewpoint. T F 6. There is one conflict resolution style that you can perfect and use in every situation. T F 7. Open-ended questions are intended to cause a person to reveal more information than yes/no questions. T F 8. Flexibility, resiliency, objectivity, and credibility are all positive characteristics for a conflict mediator. T F 9. "I versus you" rather than "we" is one principle of effective conflict resolution. T F 10. Acting aloof during a conflict can give the impression that you are uncaring or unconcerned. Conflict Resolution 195 Fire Service Supervision… Conflict Resolution A Self-Study Guide 196 Fire Service Supervision… A Self-Study Guide Multiple Choice--Circle the letter of the answer you choose. 1. If managed effectively, conflict can result in a. b. c. 2. The first stage a conflict goes through from inception to resolution often is called a. b. c. 3. avoiding. controlling. compromising. The first skill which should be used in conflict resolution is probably a. b. c. 7. reflection. perception. defusion. The conflict resolution style that could be most useful in a situation where the issue is trivial is a. b. c. 6. values. knowledge. feelings. Reducing the emotional tension and explosiveness potentially surrounding a conflict situation is known as a. b. c. 5. behavior. frustration. conceptualization. The word that best characterizes what would be considered the source of a conflict involving the importance of hard work is a. b. c. 4. increased workplace tension. resistance to teamwork. improved employee relationships. questioning. listening. negotiating. Fisher and Ury suggest that a key principle of conflict resolution is a. b. c. separating the people from the problem. focusing on positions, not interests. working with just one option rather than a variety. Conflict Resolution 197 Fire Service Supervision… 8. Active listening in a conflict resolution setting requires the parties to a. b. c. 9. interrupt as a way of showing interest. paraphrase and provide feedback. avoid looking at the speaker. As part of planning and preparation for conflict resolution, a. b. c. 10. A Self-Study Guide avoid considering your feelings. lock yourself into one good solution. consider your usual style and the best style to use. When the parties generate possible solutions to a conflict, they should a. b. c. make sure every stakeholder participates. agree first how to reach the goal. evaluate every solution as it is offered. Conflict Resolution 198