HZT4U Philosophy Choice Board: Ethics Using the Success Criteria that follows, select one of the options from the choice board (over) to demonstrate your understanding of an ethical question/issue. Expectations D1. Understanding Ethics: demonstrate an understanding of the main questions in ethics, and of the positions of major philosophers and schools of philosophy with respect to some of these questions; A4.2 correctly use terms relating to their chosen topics A3.3 analyse and interpret research information A3.1 assess various aspects of information gathered from primary and secondary sources (e.g., accuracy, relevance, reliability, inherent values and bias, perspective) Learning Goals We are learning to … understand ethical questions & the positions of philosophers on these questions use correct terminology related to ethics make inferences from research about a philosophical issue/question interpret research information on ethical questions Success Criteria I can … summarize the positions of appropriate philosophers on ethical questions using correct terminology related to ethics explain how various philosophers responded to these ethical questions using correct terminology related to ethics explain a relevant question in ethics make inferences from my research on an ethical topic (question) using primary and secondary sources to support an argument on my ethical question interpret my research sources (primary/secondary) with appropriate & relevant quotes to support counterarguments source all ideas, quotations, images using MLA (embedded references) A3.4 demonstrate academic honesty by documenting the sources of all information generated through research** honestly source all ideas generated in research A4. Communicating and Reflecting: communicate the results of their research and inquiry clearly and effectively, and reflect on and evaluate their research, inquiry, and communication skills. communicate ideas from research clearly to support position using oral/written communication reflect on my research, inquiry skills & communication skills honestly to improve clearly communicate in writing and/or orally (with visuals if appropriate) to demonstrate that I understand the ethical issues and questions, using one of the choices from the choice board. Select language choices to reflect ideas for intended audience explain (in separate reflection) what I learned and what I will do differently next time. I can use philosophical reasoning skills (examples and arguments) to support each idea D4.Philosophical Reasoning in Ethics: use philosophical reasoning skills to develop, communicate, and defend their own responses to philosophical questions in ethics. D3. Making Connections to Ethics: demonstrate an understanding of connections between ethics and other areas of philosophy, other subject areas, and various aspects of society, including everyday life; * *no sources, no mark! jhw 2013 use philosophical reasoning skills to support a personal response to an ethical question/issue make connections between ethics and society today I can respond to objections and counterarguments with evidence I can make connections between philosophers and relevant ideas to present day issues Select ONE of the following tasks to demonstrate your understanding of Ethics, using the Success Criteria above, with reference to the rubric that follows: I. Create a cartoon (using bitstrips) to reflect an ethical question of importance today, using philosophical ideas/ arguments/evidence IV. Write a ‘modest proposal’ based on model of Jonathon Swift to draw attention to an issue of ethical importance today, using philosophical arguments. VII. Prepare a commercial (radio/video) to explain a current ethical issue using philosophical arguments. II. Create an infographic for Philosophy students, to reflect a current ethical issue of importance today, using philosophical ideas/ arguments/evidence. V. Free Choice* VIII. Prepare a rap or rant to demonstrate a current ethical issue, using philosophical arguments. III. Write an investigative report on a current ethical issue, using philosophical arguments and evidence to demonstrate the conflicting views on the issue. VI. Prepare a presentation for children in Grade 6-8 or book for Grade 3-5 on a current ethical issue, using philosophical arguments that are appropriate for that age group. IX. Prepare a position paper with arguments on both sides of a current ethical issue, using philosophical arguments on both sides. Current issues may include (not limited to): FNMI land claims, environmental, criminal case, war, cyberspace, medical, end of life decisions, etc * This requires a proposal prior to selection and teacher approval. For advice in writing philosophy papers, check out John Nolt, Professor of Philosphy, University of Tennessee http://web.utk.edu/~nolt/courses/HOWTOWRT.html ** no sources, no mark! jhw 2013 Date __________ Criteria Philosophy Choice Board: Ethics Level 1 Knowledge Understanding -summarizes the positions of appropriate philosophers on ethical questions using correct terminology - explains how various philosophers responded to these ethical questions using correct terminology related to ethics Thinking - make inferences from research on an ethical topic using primary & secondary sources to support an argument on an ethical question - interprets research sources to support counter-arguments - source all ideas, quotations using MLA** Level 2 Application - connects between philosophers & relevant ideas to present day issues jhw 2013 Level 3 beginning knowledge of positions of few ethical philosophers limited understanding of how philosophers responded to ethical questions using minimal accurate terminology some knowledge of positions of ethical some philosophers satisfactory understanding of how philosophers responded to ethical questions using some accurate terminology considerable knowledge of positions of many ethical philosophers credible understanding of how philosophers responded to ethical questions using accurate terminology 5.1 5.4 5.8 few relevant 6.1 6.4 6.8 some relevant 7.1 7.4 7.8 relevant inferences inferences from research on an ethical topic using few sources to support an argument on an ethical question has passable support for arguments developing use of MLA to source ideas 5.1 5.4 5.8 Communication - communicates clearly on ethical issues & questions, using one of the choices from the choice board - language choices reflect ideas for intended audience (tone) Name ________________ communicates philosophical concepts with developing clarity uses a few philosophical concepts appropriately developing language choices for intended audience 5.1 5.4 5.8 makes passable connections between philosophers, philosophical ideas & current issue 5.1 5.4 5.8 inferences from research on an ethical topic using few sources to support an argument on an ethical question acceptable support for arguments satisfactory use of MLA to source ideas/images 6.1 6.4 6.8 communicates philosophical concepts with suitable clarity uses some philosophical concepts appropriately some language choices reflect intended audience 6.1 6.4 6.8 makes some connections between philosophers, philosophical ideas & current issue 6.1 6.4 6.8 Level 4 thorough knowledge of positions of several ethical philosophers expert understanding of how philosophers responded to ethical questions using accurate terminology 8.2 8.5 9.0 9.5 10 impressively from research on an relevant inferences ethical topic using from research on an few sources to ethical topic using support an sources to support argument on an an argument on an ethical question ethical question skillful support for insightful support arguments & for arguments & counter-arguments counter-arguments accurate use of accurate use of MLA to source MLA to fully source ideas/images 7.1 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.5 9.0 9.5 10 communicates communicates philosophical philosophical concepts with concepts with convincing clarity superb clarity uses philosophical uses philosophical concepts concepts fluently & appropriately & purposefully thoughtfully thoughtful language appropriate language choices reflect choices reflect ideas for intended intended audience audience 7.1 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.5 9.0 9.5 10 makes convincing makes insightful connections connections between between philosophers, philosophers, philosophical ideas & philosophical ideas & current issue current issue 7.1 7.4 7.8 8.2 8.5 9.0 9.5 10 jhw 2013