A Course for Health Professionals Children’s Rights and Child Health Grand Rounds An Introduction to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child Children’s Rights and Child Health: An Introduction to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child I. Children’s Needs and Rights The needs and rights of children form the basis for a universal set of standards by which all children should be treated in order for them to achieve their full potential for health and development. If there is universal acceptance that there are common minimum standards that apply to the treatment of all children, it follows that children are entitled to have these needs met. In other words they have rights, and adults have obligations to children to ensure that these rights are respected. A framework for the consideration of children’s needs and rights follows. Children, by virtue of their humanity, have rights. In addition, children have basic universal needs. These needs form a basic set of common standards necessary for optimal health and development. Children are entitled to be treated according to these common standards. These standards impose obligations on adults to ensure their fulfillment. A commitment to fulfill these obligations creates rights for children to have their needs met. These rights have been codified into an international human rights treaty, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Convention establishes universally binding obligations on governments and communities to protect and promote the rights of children necessary to fulfill their needs. These needs and rights can be grouped into three broad categories – physical needs, social, economic and cultural needs, and intellectual, psychological and emotional needs. Physical needs: shelter, health care, water and sanitation, protection from environmental pollution, adequate food, adequate clothing, and protection from violence, exploitation and abuse Social, economic and cultural needs: knowledge of and respect for own language, religion and culture, stable social and economic environment, recognition of and respect for emerging competencies, access to appropriate guidance and support, access to play and friendships, respect for privacy, and freedom from discrimination and prejudice 1 Intellectual, psychological and emotional needs: a stable and loving family environment, access to education, age appropriate information, stimulation, and opportunities to be listened to and taken seriously. The Relationship between Needs and Rights. A number of consequences follow from an understanding of children’s needs and rights. Children’s needs are universal. They apply to children in all socio-economic and cultural environments. The way in which needs are met will vary in different cultures and for different children. For example, family structures differ, children start education at different ages, opportunities for play may be more or less formal, the relationship of children to work varies, disabled children may need additional support, etc., but their fulfillment remains necessary. The fulfillment of all needs is essential for children’s optimal health and development. There is often a tendency to view physical needs as having priority. However, without education or play, children’s potential cannot be realized. Without respect and freedom from discrimination, their psychological and emotional well being will be impaired. Children’s needs are mutually inter-dependent. Children cannot fulfill their needs without adult support. The vulnerability and lack of power inherent in childhood means that they are dependent on the adult world to ensure that their needs are met. This places obligations on adults to create the necessary conditions that will ensure this happens. This obligation extends not only to the fulfillment of needs for individual children, such as family life, access to health care or education, but also the investment in the broader field of policies that potentially impact on children’s health and development – housing, transport, environment, macroeconomics and poverty. This means that government and community policies at all levels must take active and consistent account of children’s needs. The Convention elaborates the rights of children and calls on governments and communities to introduce the necessary measures to ensure that these rights are respected for all children. It asserts that: a) they are universal, indivisible and inter-dependent, and b) their fulfilment must be grounded in a commitment to an understanding that children, as subjects of rights, must be respected, listened to and taken seriously in the exercise of their rights. In summary: All children, by virtue of their humanity have rights. In addition, all children have needs, the fulfillment of which will facilitate their health, development and wellbeing. Needs extend beyond the physical to encompass social, economic, cultural, intellectual, emotional and psychological needs. Children cannot fulfill those needs without adult support. 2 These needs can only be fulfilled if adults accept responsibility for meeting them. Acceptance of responsibility by adults gives children an entitlement or right to have their needs met. Recognition that children have rights in respect of all their needs demands an approach in which children become active participants in the decisions and actions that affect them, not merely recipients of adult intervention and protection. II. Highlights of the UN Convention On The Rights of the Child The following principles provide a framework for understanding the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Although the US remains the only country in the world not to have ratified the Convention, we are a signatory and the articles are as relevant to US children as they are to children in any other country. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines the full range of children’s needs and provides a practical framework for addressing these needs in an integrated and holistic way. It poses a challenge to traditional approaches to children that view them as incompetent, passive objects of adult protective care. Instead, it acknowledges children as both capable of and entitled to active participation in decisions that affect their lives. It is legally binding on all countries that have ratified it. Governments are required under international law to take all necessary measures to implement its provisions. It provides a universal set of standards against which to measure and improve the treatment of children. Although there are no formal sanctions that can be brought against governments and communities for failing to comply with its provisions, the process of reporting to the Committee on the Rights of the Child is an invaluable mechanism for monitoring how a government and/or community is complying. It provides an opportunity for all those involved in children’s health and well being to work together toward improving standards. Implementation of the rights contained in the Convention would herald a fundamental change in the status of children in all societies in the world and ensure their optimal health and development and fulfillment of potential. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is an international human rights treaty that introduces the concept of children as subjects of rights with the same inherent value 3 as adults. It was drafted over a ten-year period by a working group established by the UN General Assembly who adopted it in 1989. The Convention on the Rights of the Child is the most recent of six UN human rights treaties, the others being the: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights (1966), International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination (1966), Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (1979), and Convention against Torture, and other Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment (1984). While these treaties do not exclude children, they do not explicitly affirm their rights nor address the very different situation or status of children as compared with adults. The Convention on the Rights of the Child promotes a philosophy of respect for children. While acknowledging that children are entitled to special protection and care, it also insists that they are entitled to participate, in accordance with their age and competence, in the protection of their own rights. In other words, the Convention challenges us to rethink the traditional perception of children as merely recipients of adult protection and to begin to accept them as social actors with rights to be listened to and taken seriously in their own right. This challenge has significant implications for adult relationships with children, as parents, as teachers, as policy-makers and politicians, as journalists, and of course, as child health and serving professionals. What rights does the Convention contain? The Convention is a broad-ranging treaty that contains some 40 “articles” defining the rights of children. These rights include: Social rights. The right to life and optimal survival and development, to the best possible health and access to health care, to education, to play, to family life unless not in the child’s best interests, to alternative care when unable to be looked after by parents, to family reunification, to promotion of the fullest possible social inclusion for disabled children, to support for parents in order that they can protect their children's rights. Economic rights. The right to an adequate standard of living for proper development, to benefit from social security, to protection from economic exploitation. Cultural rights. The right to respect for language, culture and religion, to abolition of any traditional practices likely to be prejudicial to the child’s health. 4 Protective rights. The right to promotion of the child’s best interests, to protection from sexual exploitation, from armed conflict, from harmful drugs, from illegal sale and trafficking, from abuse and neglect, to rehabilitative care following neglect, exploitation or abuse. Civil and political rights. The right to be heard and taken seriously, to freedom from discrimination in the exercise of rights on any grounds, to freedom of religion, association and expression, to privacy, to information, to respect for physical and personal integrity and freedom from all forms of violence, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, to respect for due process in the law, recognition of the importance of treating the child with respect within the criminal justice system and respect for the right not to be detained arbitrarily. These rights are indivisible and universal. There is no hierarchy of importance. Together they create a holistic framework of rights that, if fully respected, would promote the health, welfare, development and active participation of all children. General principles underlying the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has identified four key principles that must be considered when implementing all other rights. Article 2. The right to non-discrimination. All the rights in the Convention apply to all children without discrimination on any grounds. In other words, governments and communities must take measures to ensure that all the rights in the Convention apply without discrimination to all children. This means both direct and indirect discrimination. Article 3. The duty to promote the best interests of the child. Article 3 of the Convention places an obligation on public and private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, etc., that in all actions affecting children, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration. The article limits the duty to ‘a primary’ and not ‘the primary’ nor ‘the paramount’ consideration. In other words, other considerations can inform actions affecting children. Article 6. The right to survival and development. Article 6 of the Convention stresses the right of every child to life and optimal survival and development. This right imposes obligations not only to actively provide health services to protect the lives of children, but also to create an environment in which children’s development can flourish. Article 12. The right to be listened to and taken seriously. Article 12 provides that all children have the right to express their views on all matters of concern to them and to have those views taken seriously in accordance with their age and maturity. Only if children are listened to, can they challenge abuses or neglect of their rights. 5 Since its adoption by the UN General Assembly in 1989, the Convention has already achieved a great deal for children. At the international level, there is far greater awareness of and commitment to end exploitative child labor, sexual abuse and exploitation of children, discrimination against girls and disabled children, and the use of children as soldiers. At the national level, many governments and communities have begun to analyze and improve their legislation to bring it in line with the Convention’s rights, to establish independent Children’s Rights Commissioners (Ombudsmen), to raise public awareness of children’s rights, to develop programs designed to promote the best interests of children, to end all forms of violence against children, and to divert extra resources to fulfill obligations to children. At the national, regional and local levels in many countries, measures have been introduced to the principle that children are entitled to express their views and have them taken seriously, to tackle discrimination, to improve child protection measures, and to encourage breast-feeding. Is the Convention anti-family or anti-parent? There is often concern expressed that the Convention, by emphasizing the rights of children, is anti-family and undermines parental authority. These concerns are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the Convention. The preamble of the Convention, as well as many of its articles emphasize that growing up within a caring family environment is crucial to children’s healthy development. Article 5 recognizes parents’ rights and duties to provide direction and guidance to children. Article 9 stresses the right of children not to be separated from their parents unless necessary for their best interests. Article 18 stresses the obligations of governments to provide support and help to parents in order to help them fulfill their role of promoting and protecting their children’s rights. However, the Convention does imply changes to the traditional way in which children have often been viewed within the family. It requires that: They are listened to and their views taken seriously, Increasing recognition is given to their ability to make decisions for themselves as they grow older, Parents consider children’s best interests when making decisions that affect them, and Recognition is given to the fact that children’s interests will not always coincide with those of their parents. 6 The Convention encourages a culture of respect for children within families as well as in the wider society. But this does not undermine or diminish the role of parents. Rights allow children to take part in decisions that affect them, not to take over. They place a responsibility on parents to provide proper care and protection through listening and valuing children’s opinions. Parental respect for children is likely to encourage children’s respect for their parents. However, the Convention does not make assumptions that children, irrespective of age, will have equal competence to exercise their rights. It contains recognition of children’s evolving capacities as they mature. III. Respecting Children’s Rights in Pediatric Practice The following principles provide insight into the rights of children to engage in decision making within the limits of their age and competencies. Children are entitled to be actively involved in decisions related to them from the earliest possible age. Involvement means listening to children and taking their views seriously, respecting their evolving competence to take responsibility for themselves and recognizing the importance of confidentiality, particularly for adolescents. Participation of children is important in principle—all people are entitled to be consulted over decisions that affect them. It also has considerable practical benefits to enhancing both the quality of care and the child’s general well being. Implementation of a commitment to involve children will necessitate considerable changes in practice and programs. It will require training of all health and child serving professionals and para-professional staff dealing with children, and necessitate making time available to listen to and talk with them. Using Health as a “case study,” the following is a demonstration of the relevance and use of the principles and standards of the Convention to the way that health policy is developed and implemented. The Convention’s articles can be used as a framework with which to develop and monitor public policy at all levels. In other words, they provide a lens through which to evaluate how and what services are provided to/for children. Children’s right to the best possible health. Key articles in the Convention explicitly deal with health. Together they place a high priority on investment in health care services designed to promote children’s health and development. Article 6, the right to life and optimal development was described previously. Article 24. The right to the best possible health and access to health care. This article stresses that governments have a responsibility to ensure that no child is deprived of their right of access to health care services. It goes on to stress the need to take action to end traditional practices prejudicial to the health of children. 7 Article 2. Non-discrimination. Every child has the right to equal respect for all the rights contained in the Convention. In practice, it is rarely the case that all children have equal access to health care. For example: (a) disabled children, (b) ethnic minority or indigenous children, (c) poor children, (d) adolescents, (e) incarcerated children. Article 3. The obligation to promote the best interests of children. Article 3 of the Convention states that “in all actions affecting children, their best interests must be a primary consideration.” Article 3 does not require that children always be the paramount consideration. However, it does mean that health authorities and professionals must always consider all their actions to assess their potential impact on children and seek to ensure that children’s interests are given serious attention. What implication does this have for health policy and services? In practice, it means that: a) services must be developed and organized for the benefit of the child rather than for the convenience of providers and administrators, and b) providing training for students and/or creating research opportunities must not be the priority for children’s services. For example: Article 12. Listening to children and taking them seriously. The principle that children have the right to be listened to and taken seriously is central to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. However, the principle does not just apply only to individual children. Equally important is the need to consult with groups of children and young people in the development of health services, their operations and to determine what services are needed. Listening to children is not just right in principle, but it is one of the most effective means of ensuring that children’s rights to the best possible health are fulfilled. The Convention contains many other rights that, if respected, will result in better health and development for children. The right to protection from all forms of violence and sexual abuse. There must be a community standard to ensure that children are safe. The right not to be separated from parents. Every effort must be made to enable detained children to maintain contact with their parents, and children should not be institutionalised and denied their right to family life as a result of either physical or intellectual disability. The right to education and play. All children have the same right to education and to play, and all efforts must be made to provide opportunities for children to maintain their education and to be able to play. The right to protection from arbitrary detention. Children should not be forcibly detained in mental health institutions unless doing so is absolutely necessary for their 8 protection and safety, or the protection and safety of others. When it is necessary, there must be effective safeguards, time limits and rights of appeal. The right not to suffer cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment. The following is a sample charter of Children’s Rights that could be used and displayed in programs and facilities An Outline for a Charter of Children’s Rights The following is a draft outline of suggestions that could be included in a charter of children’s rights. In developing such a charter, it will be necessary to consult with children themselves on what they feel should be covered and how they would like it to be worded. If I am seeking, needing or receiving health care, I have a right to the following. I have the right to the best possible treatment and care. I have the right to be listened to and have my views taken seriously. I have the right to be given information that will help me understand my treatment. I have the right to ask for advice, information and support. I have the right to be asked before anyone touches me. I have the right to respect for my privacy. I have an equal right to treatment and care, regardless of my sex, abilities or disabilities, color, race or religion. I have the right not to be hurt or humiliated. IV. Health Policy and Health Services The following comments relate to the implications of children’s rights for health policy. 9 Children have the right to life and the best possible health and the right to access to the best possible health care services. It is not enough simply to assume that services are promoting children’s health and development. It is necessary to scrutinise services to ensure they actually protect and promote children’s rights. Key principles in the Convention can be used as a means of monitoring whether standards are being met for all children. Giving consistent priority to promoting the best interests of children can be helped by introducing and institutionalising systems for raising standards throughout the service delivery system, including training, consultation, analysis of budgets, integrated planning of services, etc. The principles and standards of the Convention have significant implications for the way that health policy is developed and implemented. The Convention’s articles can be used as a framework with which to develop and monitor health policy at all levels. In other words, they provide a lens through which to evaluate how and what services are provided to/for children. How to implement the right to the best possible health. Consistent and effective consideration of children’s rights in the development and delivery of health and human services will not happen by chance. There are many competing interests and more powerful voices than those of children. Rather, it is necessary to introduce systems to ensure that as services are developed, they are scrutinized from the perspective of whether they will promote and protect children’s rights. There are a number of processes that can be built into the development and delivery of services in order to achieve this goal. Formally “adopt” the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child as a framework for developing policies and practice. Develop systems for consulting with children and young people in the development, delivery, monitoring and evaluation of services. Work with staff, parents and children in developing a Children’s Charter establishing what children are entitled to expect when they need and seek health care. Develop systems for analyzing the degree to which health service expenditures benefit children and whether they reflect their assessed levels of need. Establish effective collaborative planning to ensure comprehensiveness in the development of services for children. 10 consistency and Provide training for all relevant staff on children’s rights and the implications of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Encourage the appointment of an independent children’s commissioner or ombudsman who can monitor how effectively children’s rights to health are being protected. V. The Health Professional As Advocate Consideration of children’s rights has compelling implications for the generation of public policy related to the health and well being of children. Children’s rights cannot be fulfilled simply through the provision of effective services. The social, economic and physical environments in which they live can and do have powerful influences on their well-being. Children lack the democratic rights available to adults with which to protect their rights. Accordingly, they need adults willing to act as advocates on their behalf. Child health and serving professionals have insight and experience with respect to how children’s lives and their rights are affected by their environment, and how the actions and inactions of governments and communities contribute to the failure to protect their rights. By advocating as a body, professionals can tackle the barriers to children’s rights, rather than simply treating the consequences. Children themselves have a contribution to make to their own protection in conjunction with adult advocates. A greater recognition of children’s rights in: a) individual professional practices and programs, b) the delivery of services and c) public policy are needed if the optimal health, development and well-being of all children are to be protected and promoted. A large percentage of children in our society are denied the right to optimal health and development, either as a result of public policies that impact directly or indirectly on their lives, or as a failure to take the action necessary to provide them healthy and safe environments. Because of their youth, children are disproportionately vulnerable to the harmful effects of such policies. Child poverty has a profound impact on children’s physical, mental, emotional and psychological well-being. The impact of inadequate diets, overcrowding, unsanitary housing, lack of education, etc. can extend well beyond childhood to impair longterm life chances. 11 Childhood accidents are far more common among poor children and can be exacerbated by the priority given to motorists than pedestrians, by failure to invest in safety programs, lack of attention to safety in design of public spaces, etc. Environmental pollution is damaging the health of millions of children through toxic emissions, widespread use of chemical pesticides, exposure to landfills and other sources toxic substances differentially disposed in core urban and rural areas, etc. The fashion industry is encouraging increasing numbers of young girls to aspire to images of thinness which cannot be attained while eating a normal diet, resulting in a high prevalence of bulimia and anorexia. Food advertising targeted at children encourages a desire for foods that are high in fat, sugar and salt, leading to a greater incidence of obesity and other chronic diseases. Violence is disproportionately targeted at children. The risk of homicide for babies under one year is many times greater than the risk for any other age group. Physical punishment remains legal in the US and is widely used and tolerated despite the growing body of evidence of its harmful impact on children. In these and many other ways, public policies influence whether children’s rights are being protected and promoted in our communities. Too often, the best interests of children are subjugated to other more powerful or influential interests. Health and other child serving professionals deal daily with the consequences of the failure to respect the rights of children to the best possible health, to an adequate standard of living, to a safe and healthy environment and to life itself. More than any other professionals, they can bear witness to the detrimental impact of public policy on the lives of children. Through their involvement with individual children, they are able to document the cumulative consequences of social and environmental factors that are harmful to their well-being. This provides them with the evidence with which to advocate for the changes necessary to prevent harm to children, rather than simply to intervene and treat once the harm has occurred. The need for advocates for children. Children are relatively powerless in advocating for protection of their rights. They lack access to the channels that adults use to influence public agendas and debates. As a group: They cannot vote, They rarely have access to the courts, They are not members of trades unions or professional associations, They have little or no access to the media, and They do not have powerful lobbies acting on their behalf to counter the wellresourced and sophisticated corporate lobbies that increasingly influence governments. 12 It is therefore most important that those adults, who are informed about the situation of children and committed to promoting greater respect for their rights, are willing to become advocates for them. In so doing, it is important that they also work with children to help them articulate for themselves their concerns and priorities for change. There are many ways in which child health and serving professionals can seek to use their expertise and knowledge of what is happening to children as a consequence of public policy. The issues of primary concern will vary from community to community, and there will invariably be more issues than there are time and resources available to commit. Criteria for determining where to focus energy are useful. The scale and degree of harm. How many children are affected and with what degree of severity? The degree of urgency. Is it an issue that should be addressed urgently if many more children are not to be affected? The potential for enlisting broad public support. A campaign is more likely to be successful if you can attract other partners to support the cause? The topicality of the issue. If the issue has attracted media attention, or public interest, you can capitalize on its topicality to promote the case from a children’s rights perspective. The current political environment. You can exploit windows of opportunity, for example, when a relevant bill is passing a legislative body that could be amended to introduce better protections for children, or a general election where you can lobby political parties to take your issues of concern seriously. The likelihood of success. It may be a better investment of time to focus on policy issues that are attainable in the short-term, as well as other more challenging longterm goals. Tools for advocacy. The first task in seeking to advocate improvements in children’s rights to optimal health and development is to identify what changes will be necessary. Will it require legal reform, additional resources, a change of policy, or a shift in public attitudes? Can change be achieved locally or does it require state or national reform? For example, the introduction of a safe route to school to reduce traffic accidents and promote children’s opportunity for physical exercise could be lobbied for locally. A change in the law to limit corporal punishment would require a state or national campaign and legal reform, as would the introduction of stricter controls on advertising junk food during children’s television viewing times. 13 Once the required/desired change has been identified, appropriate action can then be taken to highlight issues of concern and campaigns for change. The following are some steps to consider. Gather evidence from other practitioners in the field, and from children themselves on the extent and nature of the problem. Commission and undertake specific research into the issue. Publish articles, both in professional journals and also in the popular media, highlighting the impact of a particular public policy on children’s well-being. Seek other partners and stakeholders, including parents and children to press for change. Organize conferences to gather experts together to share and exchange evidence and strategies for achieving change. Look internationally for evidence of how comparable issues are addressed. Lobby government and legislators to introduce the changes necessary to protect children’s well-being, using the evidence gathered from all sources. Identify possible legislation into which changes could be introduced to achieve the changes being sought. Issue press releases whenever an opportunity arises to link your issues of concern to topical news items. Highlight how the government is failing to comply with its legal and ethical obligations to protect the rights of children. Gather evidence from children on their experience of the issues of concern. Involve them in conferences and articles, and use direct quotes from their experience. The plight of children living in poverty is an example of a set of issues faced by child health and serving professionals every day. Children living in privately rented substandard multi-occupied housing are disproportionately vulnerable to accidents, fire, food poisoning, respiratory disease and infestation. In such environments, they are denied many possibilities of respect for their right to the best possible health and other elements of well-being. If professionals are witnessing a consistent pattern of problems related to the environment, e.g., asthma, lead poisoning, accidents, etc., the only way they can protect these children’s rights is to focus on the cause of the problem. 14 Conclusion The intent of this overview has been to introduce professionals to the relationship between children’s rights and the health and well-being of our communities’ children. Insight into how the Convention and children’s rights can be used as a framework for structuring our work together will hopefully serve as a catalyst for fundamental changes in how we conceptualize children and childhood, how they are treated, how we structure our society and how we as professionals do what we do. Unless we look beyond the perimeter of our own programs and traditional approaches to ensure the well-being of all children, and examine how the social, economic and physical environments in which children develop can deny them the right to fulfill their optimal health and development, we will never achieve the outcomes we all seek. An understanding and use of children’s rights and the Convention provides the promise of a vision of an optimal state of wellbeing for all children. 15 Power Point Presentation Grand Rounds An Introduction to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child 16