1 Performance criteria for standard performance for the Researcher / Post-doctoral Researcher Manual This document is an implementation of the strategic decisions made by the Executive Board of TU Delft and set out in the Strategic Plan 2007 – 2010. It is an instrument for maintaining the quality of the execution of tasks by academic staff. The text of this document has been formulated in a working group comprising professors from all the faculties of TU Delft. This document is intended as a guide for the supervisor who is conducting an interview with the staff member on the qualitative implementation of the job profile. The texts included in this document which pertain to the staff member’s job performance are not of a prescriptive nature and no rights may be derived from these texts. This document is part of a series containing the performance criteria for all academic job profiles at TU Delft at nominal performance. Three elements within this series form the ‘backbone’ of the series: the documents for the Assistant Professor (UD), for the Associate Professor (UHD) and for the Full Professor (HL). All other elements of the series are derived from these. TU Delft believes that the focus of work in the series of job profiles UD 2, UD 1, UHD 2, UHD 1, HL 2 and HL 1 should, in the course of an academic’s career, gradually shift from ‘focus on one’s own work’ to ‘focus on the institutional and supra-institutional level’. In the following pages, the scope of the job profile is subdivided into four performance areas: Education, Research, Valorisation and Organisation and Leadership. In some cases, a performance area may be examined not only in terms of qualitative but also of quantitative performance. The texts are colour-coded and are assigned the following status: - The text in the orange text boxes (‘Job profile (UFO)’) as well as the red text is derived from the VSNU job classification system known as UFO and may not be amended within the context of an individual university; - The black text is applicable to all ‘boxes’ (see below); - The blue text is considered to be particularly relevant to the ‘science’ box (AS, EEMCS); - The purple text is considered to be particularly relevant to the ‘engineering’ box (CEG, 3mE, AE); - The green text is considered to be particularly relevant to the ‘design’ box (Architecture, IDE, TPM) Working Group on Performance Criteria for Academic Staff, January 2008 2 Academic staff performance matrix / UFO allocation criteria Job profile (UFO): Acquiring and conducting academic research, as well as publishing on this research, based on the research plan of the department (capacity group) and in consultation with the Full Professor, in order to make a contribution to the development of academic knowledge and insights in part of a designated research area. Researcher 1 Researcher 2 Researcher 3 Researcher 4 Quality and innovation Sub-aspects of the performance area Standard Performance of the Researcher / Post-doctoral Researcher (not applicable) (not applicable) (not applicable) (not applicable) Output (quantity) Education Performance area No rights may be derived from this document. It is a guide for the supervisor who is conducting an interview with the staff member on the qualitative implementation of the job profile. (not applicable) (not applicable) (not applicable) (not applicable) Required competencies1: (not applicable) 1 Cf.: Guide “Competence Instrument for the Dutch Universities” 3 Academic staff performance matrix / UFO allocation criteria Quality and innovation (See also: p.4) Research Performance area Sub-aspects of the performance area No rights may be derived from this document. It is a guide for the supervisor who is conducting an interview with the staff member on the qualitative implementation of the job profile. Standard Performance of the Researcher / Post-doctoral Researcher Job profile (UFO): Acquiring and conducting academic research, as well as publishing on this research, based on the research plan of the department (capacity group) and in consultation with the Full Professor, in order to make a contribution to the development of academic knowledge and insights in part of a designated research area. Researcher 1 Researcher 2 Researcher 3 Researcher 4 Independently conducts research in a broad2 / specialist3 field of research Makes an in-depth contribution to the department’s field Provides concepts for improvement within the department’s domain Makes proposals for structuring research programmes Publishes in leading international journals Grows into an (international) authority in one’s own field of research e.g. as indicated by a portfolio validated by independent peers (design) (engineering) Is regularly invited to give lectures at leading (international) symposia (science) Is invited to present at, or participates in, (international) scientific programme committees (science) Participates in scientific advisory and/or assessment committees (science) Operates at ‘Vidi level’. Independently conducts research in a broad4 / specialist5 field of research Makes an in-depth contribution to the research group’s field Provides concepts for improvement within the research group’s domain Creates cohesion of content between subprojects Participates in the circuit at international level, organises gatherings Participates in (international) projects Realises (international) copublications Is quick to claim a discovery Moves with ease in the international network of the specialist field Publications by other authors in leading (international) journals in the specialist field on the content of the portfolio (design) Develops new engineering skills and publishes on these (engineering). Independently conducts research Makes an in-depth contribution to the research group’ e.g. as indicated by a portfolio validated by independent peers (design) (engineering) Provides concepts for improvement within the research group, extending beyond one’s own doctoral research Is invited to give lectures (science) (Helps to) acquire externally funded research assignments Writes project proposals Not only builds up a portfolio but also publishes on this in the leading journals in the field (design) Works on worldwide ‘visibility’ e.g. through prototyping, patents or attention-getting themes (engineering). Under supervision, carries out research on the basis of a predefined and approved research proposal Has gained one’s doctorate (science) Makes an in-depth contribution to one’s own specialist field e.g. as indicated by a portfolio validated by independent peers (design) (engineering) Provides concepts for improvement within one’s own specialist field Gives lectures at (international) symposia Participates in an international project Supervises fellow PhD students by providing subject-specific guidance (science) Operates at ‘Veni level’. Acquisition of indirect and contract funding Initiates, acquires and is 2 3 4 5 A A A A Initiates, acquires and is Makes contributions to accountable for indirect accountable for indirect acquisition of indirect and and contract funding for and contract funding for contract funding for both both one’s own and others’ both one’s own and others’ one’s own and others’ research research research Makes strategic choices Makes well-considered Indicator: Writes good regarding research funds choices regarding research proposal for 1 research and research proposals funds and research position per year in one’s proposals own field, which on Indicator: Writes good average meets with proposals for 3 research Indicator: Writes good success. positions per year in one’s proposals for research own field, which on positions per year in one’s average meet with success. own field, which on average meet with success. broad field of research can also be taken to mean a multidisciplinary field of research specialist field of research can also be taken to mean a field of research that requires a groundbreaking approach to research broad field of research can also be taken to mean a multidisciplinary field of research specialist field of research can also be taken to mean a field of research that requires a groundbreaking approach to research Contributes to the acquisition of indirect and contract funding Indicator: Writes good proposal for 1 research position together with others. 4 Academic staff performance matrix / UFO allocation criteria Performance area Sub-aspects of the performance area No rights may be derived from this document. It is a guide for the supervisor who is conducting an interview with the staff member on the qualitative implementation of the job profile. Standard Performance of the Researcher / Post-doctoral Researcher Job profile (UFO): Acquiring and conducting academic research, as well as publishing on this research, based on the research plan of the department (capacity group) and in consultation with the Full Professor, in order to make a contribution to the development of academic knowledge and insights in part of a designated research area. Researcher 1 Researcher 2 Researcher 3 Researcher 4 Critical Achievement Indicators: Output (quantity) Research (continuation and conclusion) Publications (‘classical’, reflective, innovative) Specialist publications (engineering, design) Exhibitions (engineering, design) Presence Publications in (international) scientific journals Writing international scientific book (parts) Hirsch factor within one’s own specialist field (science) Publications in conference proceedings Designs (innovative ‘publication’, design result) Receivables PhD dissertations Prototypes validated by peers / jury (design, engineering) Protospaces validated by peers / jury (design, engineering) Prototypologies validated by peers / jury (engineering, design) Pilot Software validated by peers Required competencies6: Citations (science) Design ‘citations’ (design) Scientific awards Design awards (design) Participation in indirect funding projects Participation in contract funding projects / ICESKIS Agenda setting NL (design, engineering) Media coverage (design) Keynote speaker NL Keynote speaker International Jury membership International (design) Contribution to the TU Delft brand name Research-based educational impact, student numbers Organises symposia / conferences Developing a vision, conceptual ability, analytical ability, communicating, presenting, negotiating, power of persuasion, networking skills, initiative, entrepreneurship. 6 Cf.: Manual “Competence Instrument for the Dutch Universities” 5 Academic staff performance matrix / UFO allocation criteria Sub-aspects of the performance area Performance area No rights may be derived from this document. It is a guide for the supervisor who is conducting an interview with the staff member on the qualitative implementation of the job profile. Standard Performance of the Researcher / Post-doctoral Researcher Job profile (UFO): Acquiring and conducting academic research, as well as publishing on this research, based on the research plan of the department (capacity group) and in consultation with the Full Professor, in order to make a contribution to the development of academic knowledge and insights in part of a designated research area. Researcher 1 Making developed and to be developed knowledge available to society (including marketing new processes, products and services to companies and organisations) and utilising this knowledge Valorisation Maintains intensive contacts with (multinational) organisations and collaborates with these, thus facilitating contract research falling outside regular programmes, and formulates corresponding proposals Makes scientific knowledge available to society Generates income from granted licences Provides information to an audience of professional colleagues in one’s own field, also within a non-university context. Researcher 2 Realises unique contacts with large companies and care-providing organisations to facilitate contract research falling outside regular programmes Is able to use contacts/contracts with organisations such as these in order to generate income Conducts technicalscientific consultancy for large, medium-sized and small enterprises and for government organisations Takes an active approach to potential patentability and marketing of research output Supervises ‘inventors’ in researching the exploitability of an invention Is active (possibly as hands-on expert) in setting up techno-starters companies and spin-offs Is active in the social debate relevant to the specialist field. Required competencies7: Researcher 3 Is actively engaged in creating networks with companies and government organisations Shows the ability to acquire contract research falling outside regular research programmes Carries out the feasibility study for patent applications for inventions made within the group. Researcher 4 Helps to realise, in a substantive manner, contracts with social organisations Takes an active attitude to the patentability of research output Is active in providing public information relating to one’s specialist field. Developing a vision, conceptual ability, adaptability, communicating, negotiating, cooperation, networking skills, initiative, focus on results, perseverance, entrepreneurship. 7 Cf.: Manual “Competence Instrument for the Dutch Universities” 6 Academic staff performance matrix / UFO allocation criteria Sub-aspects of the performance area Organisation: contributing to improvement (TU Delft first; collaboration) Leadership: inspiring, directing and coaching9 (incl. Personal effectiveness) Organisation and Leadership Performance area No rights may be derived from this document. It is a guide for the supervisor who is conducting an interview with the staff member on the qualitative implementation of the job profile. Standard Performance of the Researcher / Post-doctoral Researcher Job profile (UFO): Acquiring and conducting academic research, as well as publishing on this research, based on the research plan of the department (capacity group) and in consultation with the Full Professor, in order to make a contribution to the development of academic knowledge and insights in part of a designated research area. Researcher 1 Researcher 2 Researcher 3 Researcher 4 Provides leadership for Participates in working Shows responsibility for the interests of the faculty and/or institution and takes this factor into account. Shows responsibility for the interests of the research group, takes this factor into account and acts with transparency towards the group. Provides subject-specific Works explicitly on one’s own professionalisation and personal effectiveness Provides subject-specific coaching7 for students, PhD students, trainees, other persons in the immediate working environment Works explicitly on one’s own personal effectiveness On the basis of R&D interviews, works on one’s own personal effectiveness working groups, committees or project teams within the department Creates added value in collaboration with one’s own graduates, PhD students and staff (administrative and support staff) Is (co-)initiator of activities8 at the departmental level Shows responsibility for the interests of the faculty and/or institution and takes this factor into account. supervision for academic staff as they carry out research Coaches7 students, PhD students, trainees, other persons in the immediate working environment Acts as daily supervisor for PhD students. groups, committees or project teams within the department Creates added value and actively seeks collaboration with other members of the group Participates in activities6 at departmental level Shows responsibility for the interests of the faculty and/or institution, takes this factor into account and acts with transparency towards the department. Required competencies10: Adaptability, self-reflection, cooperation, coaching7, delegating, initiative, focus on results, loyalty. 8 Activities can be taken to mean: administration, committees, social events, PR activities. This involves visible activities for promoting the quality and quantity of research and education within the organisation at the organisational level. 9 Coaching is here taken to mean: helping others to recognise and specify their own development potential, helping them to make optimum use of and to strengthen their competencies regarding both their specialist skills and their personal development and career. (Including the elements: giving open feedback, stimulating development through a balance of guidance and freedom to act, being a role model, giving space for people to rise higher than the coach himself) 10 Cf.: Manual “Competence Instrument for the Dutch Universities”