Chapter 8. Entropy and Molecular Organization Faculty Resource and Organizational Guide (FROG) Table of Contents Materials for Chapter 8 Activities ................................................................................................6 Reagents for Chapter 8 Activities: ...............................................................................................7 Introduction and References for Entropy ...................................................................................8 References: ...................................................................................................................................9 Section 8.1. Mixing and Osmosis .................................................................................................9 Learning Objectives for Section 8.1 ............................................................................................9 Investigate This 8.1. Does water move through a hollow carrot filled with syrup? ...................9 Student Report Sheet for Investigate This 8.1 ...........................................................................11 Consider This 8.2. What direction does water move through a hollow carrot?........................12 Section 8.2. Probability and Change .........................................................................................12 Learning Objectives for Section 8.2 ..........................................................................................12 Consider This 8.3. What is the probability of change? .............................................................12 Section 8.3. Counting Molecular Arrangements in Mixtures .................................................14 Learning Objectives for Section 8.3 ..........................................................................................14 Investigate This 8.4. How are distinguishable arrangements counted? ....................................14 Section 8.4. Implications for Mixing and Osmosis in Macroscopic Systems .........................15 Learning Objectives for Section 8.4 ..........................................................................................15 Section 8.5. Energy Arrangements Among Molecules ............................................................16 Learning Objectives for Section 8.5 ..........................................................................................16 Investigate This 8.7. How is a different kind of distinguishable arrangement counted? ..........16 Section 8.6. Entropy ....................................................................................................................18 Learning Objectives for Section 8.6 ..........................................................................................18 Section 8.7. Phase Changes and Net Entropy ...........................................................................18 Learning Objectives for Section 8.7 ..........................................................................................18 Consider This 8.10. What are the relative probabilities of different phases? ...........................18 Consider This 8.12. What happens in an ice-water mixture at different temperatures? ...........19 Consider This 8.14. How does thermal entropy change depend upon temperature? ................20 Consider This 8.17. What are net entropy changes for ice and water changes at 273 K? ........21 Section 8.8. Gibbs Free Energy ..................................................................................................22 Learning Objectives for Section 8.8 ..........................................................................................22 Section 8.9. Thermodynamic Calculations for Chemical Reactions ......................................22 Learning Objectives for Section 8.9 ..........................................................................................22 Section 8.10. Why Oil and Water Don’t Mix............................................................................23 Learning Objectives for Section 8.10 ........................................................................................23 Investigate This 8.35. What happens when oil and water are mixed? ......................................23 Consider This 8.36. Why don't oil and water mix? ..................................................................24 March 2005 ACS Chemistry FROG 1 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Section 8.11. Ambiphilic Molecules: Micelles and Bilayer Membranes ................................25 Learning Objectives for Section 8.11 ........................................................................................25 Investigate This 8.37. How does light interact with solutions? ................................................26 Consider This 8.38. What causes light to interact with a solution? ..........................................27 Consider This 8.40. How do ambiphilic molecules interact with nonpolar solutes? ................28 Consider This 8.41. How do the properties of bilayer membranes help explain osmosis? ......29 Section 8.12. Colligative Properties of Solutions ......................................................................29 Learning Objectives for Section 8.12 ........................................................................................29 Investigate This 8.42. What is the freezing point of salt water? ...............................................30 Consider This 8.43. How does salt affect the freezing point of water? ....................................31 Consider This 8.48. Is the entropy change larger for boiling a solution or pure solvent? ........31 Section 8.13. Osmotic Pressure Calculations ............................................................................33 Learning Objectives for Section 8.13 ........................................................................................33 Section 8.14. The Cost of Molecular Organization ..................................................................33 Learning Objectives for Section 8.14 ........................................................................................33 Section 8.16. Extension—Thermodynamics of Rubber ...........................................................33 Learning Objectives for Section 8.16 ........................................................................................33 Worksheet on Section 8.12 and Rubber-Band Thermodynamics ..............................................33 Solutions for Chapter 8 Check This Activities ...........................................................................35 Check This 8.5. Unmixing ........................................................................................................35 Check This 8.6. Transfer of solvent from solution to pure solvent ..........................................35 Check This 8.9. Energy transfer from a cooler to a warmer solid ............................................35 Check This 8.11. Direction of positional entropy changes .......................................................36 Check This 8.13. Net entropy change for water freezing .........................................................36 Check This 8.16. Net entropy change for freezing water with surroundings at 263 K ............36 Check This 8.19. Formation of N2O4(g) under standard conditions at 350 K ..........................37 Check This 8.20. Criterion for direction of change ..................................................................37 Check This 8.22. Free energy change for urea formation at 325 K ..........................................37 Check This 8.24. Significance of the graphical relationship of H°, TS°, and G° vs. T .....37 Check This 8.25. The melting point of benzene .......................................................................37 Check This 8.27. Predict the direction of the entropy change for glucose fermentation ..........38 Check This 8.28. Entropy change for glucose fermentation .....................................................38 Check This 8.30. Free energy change for fermentation of glucose ..........................................38 Check This 8.32. Free energy change for fermentation of glucose ..........................................38 Check This 8.34. Free energy change for dissolving barium carbonate ...................................39 Check This 8.39. Evidence for micelle formation ....................................................................39 Check This 8.45. Determining molar mass of a solute from freezing point lowering ..............39 Check This 8.47. Freezing point lowering by a polar solute in a nonpolar solvent..................40 Check This 8.49. Boiling point of a solution ............................................................................40 Check This 8.51. Osmotic pressure of an ionic solution ..........................................................40 2 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Solutions for Chapter 8 End-of-Chapter Problems....................................................................41 Problem 8.1. ...............................................................................................................................41 Problem 8.2. ...............................................................................................................................41 Problem 8.3. ...............................................................................................................................41 Problem 8.4. ...............................................................................................................................41 Problem 8.5. ...............................................................................................................................41 Problem 8.6. ...............................................................................................................................42 Problem 8.7. ...............................................................................................................................42 Problem 8.8. ...............................................................................................................................43 Problem 8.9. ...............................................................................................................................43 Problem 8.10. .............................................................................................................................44 Problem 8.11. .............................................................................................................................45 Problem 8.12. .............................................................................................................................45 Problem 8.13. .............................................................................................................................46 Problem 8.14. .............................................................................................................................46 Problem 8.15. .............................................................................................................................47 Problem 8.16. .............................................................................................................................47 Problem 8.17. .............................................................................................................................48 Problem 8.18. .............................................................................................................................48 Problem 8.19. .............................................................................................................................49 Problem 8.20. .............................................................................................................................51 Problem 8.21. .............................................................................................................................51 Problem 8.22. .............................................................................................................................51 Problem 8.23. .............................................................................................................................51 Problem 8.24. .............................................................................................................................51 Problem 8.25. .............................................................................................................................52 Problem 8.26. .............................................................................................................................53 Problem 8.27. .............................................................................................................................53 Problem 8.28. .............................................................................................................................53 Problem 8.29. .............................................................................................................................54 Problem 8.30. .............................................................................................................................54 Problem 8.31. .............................................................................................................................55 Problem 8.32. .............................................................................................................................55 Problem 8.33. .............................................................................................................................55 Problem 8.34. .............................................................................................................................56 Problem 8.35. .............................................................................................................................57 Problem 8.36. .............................................................................................................................58 Problem 8.37. .............................................................................................................................58 Problem 8.38. .............................................................................................................................59 Problem 8.39. .............................................................................................................................59 Problem 8.40. .............................................................................................................................60 Problem 8.41. .............................................................................................................................61 Problem 8.42. .............................................................................................................................61 Problem 8.43. .............................................................................................................................61 Problem 8.44. .............................................................................................................................61 Problem 8.45. .............................................................................................................................62 ACS Chemistry FROG 3 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Problem 8.46. .............................................................................................................................62 Problem 8.47. .............................................................................................................................62 Problem 8.48. .............................................................................................................................63 Problem 8.49. .............................................................................................................................63 Problem 8.50. .............................................................................................................................64 Problem 8.51. .............................................................................................................................64 Problem 8.52. .............................................................................................................................65 Problem 8.53. .............................................................................................................................65 Problem 8.54. .............................................................................................................................65 Problem 8.55. .............................................................................................................................66 Problem 8.56. .............................................................................................................................67 Problem 8.57. .............................................................................................................................68 Problem 8.58. .............................................................................................................................69 Problem 8.59. .............................................................................................................................69 Problem 8.60. .............................................................................................................................70 Problem 8.61. .............................................................................................................................70 Problem 8.62. .............................................................................................................................71 Problem 8.63. .............................................................................................................................71 Problem 8.64. .............................................................................................................................72 Problem 8.65. .............................................................................................................................72 Problem 8.66. .............................................................................................................................73 Problem 8.67. .............................................................................................................................73 Problem 8.68. .............................................................................................................................73 Problem 8.69. .............................................................................................................................74 Problem 8.70. .............................................................................................................................74 Problem 8.71. .............................................................................................................................74 Problem 8.72. .............................................................................................................................74 Problem 8.73. .............................................................................................................................74 Problem 8.74. .............................................................................................................................75 Problem 8.75. .............................................................................................................................75 Problem 8.76. .............................................................................................................................75 Problem 8.77. .............................................................................................................................75 Problem 8.78. .............................................................................................................................76 Problem 8.79. .............................................................................................................................76 Problem 8.80. .............................................................................................................................76 Problem 8.81. .............................................................................................................................77 Problem 8.82. .............................................................................................................................77 Problem 8.83. .............................................................................................................................77 Problem 8.84. .............................................................................................................................77 Problem 8.85. .............................................................................................................................78 Problem 8.86. .............................................................................................................................78 Problem 8.87. .............................................................................................................................79 Problem 8.88. .............................................................................................................................79 Problem 8.89. .............................................................................................................................79 Problem 8.90. .............................................................................................................................79 Problem 8.91. .............................................................................................................................80 4 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Problem 8.92. .............................................................................................................................84 Problem 8.93. .............................................................................................................................84 Problem 8.94. .............................................................................................................................85 Problem 8.95. .............................................................................................................................86 Problem 8.96. .............................................................................................................................87 ACS Chemistry FROG 5 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Materials for Chapter 8 Activities Activity 6 Material Quantity 8.1 1-liter beaker 1 8.1 Large fresh carrot, peeled 1 8.1 Cork borer or drill and drill bit 1 8.1 Clear plastic drinking straw or plastic transfer pipet with a wide stem 1 8.1; 8.7 Wooden toothpicks 4; 2/group 8.1 Clay 8.1 9-inch Pasteur pipet 1 8.4; 8.7 Gum drops or similar soft candy 1 package 8.35 Small test tube 1/group 8.35 Thin-stem plastic pipets 3/group 8.37` Clear, colorless plastic or glass containers 2 8.37 Stirrers 2 8.37 Flashlight or source of a bright beam of light such as a laser pointer 1 8.37 Ring stand with clamp 1 8.42 250-mL beaker 1 8.42 Wooden stirrer 1 8.42 Thermometer 1 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Reagents for Chapter 8 Activities: Activity Reagents Quantity 8.1 Pancake syrup 40 mL. 8.35 Cooking oil 2 mL/group 8.35; 8.37 Liquid dishwashing detergent 2 mL/group; few drops 8.37 Table sugar 1 packet 8.42 Crushed ice 400 mL 8.42 Coarse table salt, NaCl, or Kosher salt 90 g ACS Chemistry FROG 7 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Introduction and References for Entropy Entropy is not about disorder. The opening few sentences of this chapter try to make clear that there is an enormous amount of organization in the world around us and that much of this organization arises in spontaneous processes where order not disorder is observed. Statements about increases in disorder (somehow equated with entropy) driving spontaneous change are simplistic and incorrect. What this chapter (and an increasing number of other general chemistry textbooks) emphasizes is that entropy is a measure of the “spreadedness” of energy in a system and its surroundings. The more the energy is spread out, the higher the entropy. (Associating the symbol, S, for entropy with spreadedness can help students keep the fundamental basis of entropy in mind.) The spread of energy is measured by the number of distinguishable arrangements (microstates) of the available energy among the quantized energy levels of the system and surroundings. Entropy is related to the number of distinguishable arrangements, W (sometimes denoted ), by the Boltzmann definition: S = k lnW. Our treatment is unique (at the general chemistry level) in quantifying W in model systems that have a countable number of distinguishable arrangements and then generalizing the results to macroscopic systems. (We take one liberty by treating the spread of energy among the quantum levels in moving particles as arrangements of the particles in space, because this is an easier model to visualize. The marginal note on page 517 calls attention to this incorrect treatment and suggests trying end-of-chapter Problem 8.96 to see how a correct treatment would work in a model system.) Faculty who have used this approach report better student understanding and ability to use entropy analyses than observed with more conventional approaches. Another incorrect idea that we try to avoid in this textbook is any hint that there is a competition between energy and entropy changes as driving forces for change or reaction. It’s hard to imagine a competition between two quantities that have different units. The units of entropy are energy/K that arise via the Boltzmann constant (which along with the Planck constant) is ubiquitous in treating atomic-molecular level systems. The units reflect the spreadedness of energy, which is a function of the temperature of the system. The idea of a competition surely arises via the usual formulation for the free energy change accompanying a change or reaction in a system: G = H – TS. However, the enthalpy term really accounts for the entropy change in the thermal surroundings of the system, as pointed out in Section 8.8, so it is also related to an entropy effect. Entropy analyses of colligative properties (osmosis, freezing point lowering, and boiling point elevation) and solubilities are an important part of this chapter. These changes are easily observable, the analyses are relatively straightforward, and the consequences, especially for the solubility of ambiphilic molecules, are important in many systems, including organisms. These treatments may be somewhat unfamiliar, because these phenomena are not usually presented in the context of entropy arguments, but this context provides a unifying theme for apparently disparate phenomena. The introduction of free energy enables us to make more appropriate statements about coupled reactions than we have made in previous chapters, where only energies (enthalpies) were considered. 8 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization We hope you find this chapter to be a more intuitive introduction to entropy and analyses based on entropy change than you may have been taught or be teaching. For more background on this approach and many more examples see one or more of the books, articles, and web resources listed in these references. References: Henry A. Bent, The Second Law (Oxford, New York, 1965). Leonard K. Nash, Elements of Statistical Thermodynamics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 1968). Norman C. Craig, Entropy Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1992). John P. Lowe, “Entropy: Conceptual disorder,” J. Chem. Ed. 1988, 65, 403. Norman C. Craig, “Entropy analyses of four familiar processes,” J. Chem. Ed. 1988, 65, 760. Norman C. Craig, “Entropy Diagrams,” J. Chem. Ed. 1996, 73, 710. Frank L. Lambert, “Shuffled Cards, Messy Desks, and Disorderly Dorm Rooms – Examples of Entropy Increase? Nonsense!” J. Chem. Ed. 1999, 76, 1385. Frank L. Lambert, “Disorder – A Cracked Crutch for Supporting Entropy Discussions,” J. Chem. Ed. 2002, 79, 187. Frank L. Lambert, “Entropy is Simple, Qualitatively,” J. Chem. Ed. 2002, 79, 1241. Frank L. Lambert, “’Disorder’ in Unstretched Rubber Bands,” J. Chem. Ed. 2003, 80, 145. This is a letter commenting on Warren Hirsch, “Rubber Bands, Free Energy, and Le Chatelier’s Principle,” (a classroom activity), J. Chem. Ed. 2002, 79, 200A. The author’s reply to the letter is also at J. Chem. Ed. 2003, 80, 145. Norman C. Craig, “Campbell’s Rule for Estimating Entropy Changes in Gas-Producing and Gas-Consuming Reactions and Related Generalizations about Entropies and Enthalpies,” J. Chem. Ed. 2003, 80, 1432. J. N. Spencer and John P. Lowe, “Entropy: The Effects of Distinguishability,” J. Chem. Ed. 2003, 80, 1417. Frank Lambert's web sites: http://www.shakespeare2ndlaw.com http://www.entropysimple.com Section 8.1. Mixing and Osmosis Learning Objectives for Section 8.1 • Relate osmosis to mixing. • Describe the conditions required for osmosis and predict the direction of osmosis. Investigate This 8.1. Does water move through a hollow carrot filled with syrup? Goal: Observe the increase in volume of sugar solution (syrup) in a hollowed-out carrot suspended in pure water and interpret the change as a result of water moving through the cell membranes into the concentrated sugar solution. Set-up time: • 30 minutes. This includes time to bore the hole in the carrot and fill the hole with syrup. Time for activity: • 50 minutes. Although an easily noticeable change in the height of the solution column occurs in 20-30 minutes, most instructors simply leave the set up for the entire class period. ACS Chemistry FROG 9 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Materials: • 1-liter beaker. • Fresh carrot, peeled. (Peeling is not strictly necessary, but adds to the idea that the cells involved in the osmosis are all the same if the outer “skin” layer of cells is removed.) The width of the top of the carrot should be 3-4 cm. Some instructors have been able to do this activity with much smaller carrots, but boring out the hole gets trickier as the carrot gets smaller. • Cork borer of appropriate size (see below) or drill. • Clear plastic drinking straw or a plastic transfer pipet with a wide stem. A capillary tube will also work, but may be more difficult to seal and get syrup into. • 4 wooden toothpicks. • Clay. • 9-inch glass Pasteur pipet with bulb. Reagents: • Warm pancake syrup or other relatively non-viscous, colored sugar solution. (Do not use molasses or other heavy – viscous – syrups, as they will be difficult to get into the hollowedout carrot.) • Water. Procedure: • Before class, prepare the carrot. Peel the carrot and cut off the top to expose a fresh flat surface with a diameter of about 3-4 cm. Cut off the bottom of the carrot so that there will be space between the bottom of the beaker and the carrot when the carrot is suspended in the beaker (as shown in the photographs under Anticipated Results). • Use a cork borer to make a 10-cm long cylindrical hole down the center of the length of the carrot. The diameter of the hole should be slightly less than the diameter of the straw (or the stem of the plastic transfer pipet). If a piece of carrot remains in the hole, use a smaller cork borer to whittle out the piece of carrot. If available, you can use a drill press to bore out the hole. • Cut the drinking straw in half and insert one piece of the cut straw about 2 cm into the carrot hole. Seal carefully with clay. Alternatively, cut the bulb off the plastic transfer pipet and insert the tapered end into the hole in the carrot to form a seal like a cork. You can do this after the syrup is added to the hole, which will make it easier to get the hole filled with syrup. • Insert three or four wooden toothpicks near the top of the carrot to support it in the beaker filled with only about 0.5 cm of the carrot above the top of the beaker. • The foregoing preparation can be done several hours in advance of class (if the carrot is kept wet), but the remainder should be done very shortly before class. • Use the Pasteur pipet to add enough warm syrup (warmed to reduce the viscosity as much as possible) to bring the liquid level about 2 cm above top of the carrot. Put the pipet, filled with syrup, into the carrot as far as possible to add the syrup. This will help eliminate air bubbles in the hole. Mark the level of the syrup on the straw. If the plastic pipet is used, fill the hole in the carrot to the top with syrup and insert the tapered end of the pipet far enough to seal the hole (being careful not to press too hard and split the carrot). Add a bit of syrup to the pipet stem to make the level visible and mark the level. • Add sufficient water to the beaker so the water level is just about to the top of the carrot. Wait about 10 minutes. If liquid is oozing through the clay, your clay seal needs to be redone. If the syrup level has dropped, this means that you had air bubbles in the carrot. Add more syrup. 10 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization • To transfer the set up to class, empty the water from the beaker, leaving the carrot in place in the empty beaker, and then fill the beaker with water when you get to class. • Explain the set up (hole in the carrot filled with enough syrup to show in the column above the carrot) and begin your introduction to this chapter and discussion on mixing and osmosis. Anticipated results • After 30-40 minutes, the water level should rise, as shown here: beginning about 40 minutes later NOTE: The rise of liquid in the straw or pipet stem will occur, whether or not the carrot is immersed in water. Essentially all the water that enters the cavity in these first several minutes comes from the cells close to the cavity, not from water that surrounds the carrot. That is why you need to add the syrup very shortly before you start class. The osmosis starts immediately, even if the carrot is not in water. Clean-up: • Discard carrot in a trash container. Follow-up discussion: • Use Consider This 8.2 to initiate discussion of this activity. • Discuss mixing and osmosis as a mixing process. Follow-up activities: • End of chapter problems 8.1 through 8.5. Student Report Sheet for Investigate This 8.1 (This student report sheet serves as a template for both Investigate This and Consider This activities. Instructors can modify this sheet to meet their students' learning needs.) Name: Names of Group Members: Summary of Procedure: By monitoring the volume of syrup in a hollow carrot, observe the process of osmosis. Observations: Additional Notes: ACS Chemistry FROG 11 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Consider This 8.2. What direction does water move through a hollow carrot? Goal: Explain the observations made in Investigate This 8.1 in terms of water movement. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, to answer these questions. Then, the instructor can lead the follow-up discussion. • This activity can be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • From 5 to 15 minutes, depending on how much of the mixing discussion occurs previously and whether you include viewing and discussion of the Web Companion animation. Instructor notes: Students should reason and conclude: (a) The level of liquid in the column of syrup rises. The rise in the level of the column of liquid must be caused by an increase in the volume of liquid in the cavity of the carrot. (b) The animation in the Web Companion, Chapter 8, Section 8.4, page 1, is designed to mimic the classroom investigation, so the observations, rise of the liquid level in the column of syrup is the same in both cases. (c) Liquid must enter the cavity in the carrot from the cells surrounding it. The most likely liquid is water, since there is water on the outside of the carrot and the most abundant molecule in cells is water. One can postulate that water goes through the cell walls of the carrot to dilute the syrup, which increases its volume and causes the liquid level in the column to rise. If the water comes from the outside, it has to pass through many cells to get to the cavity. Some students may postulate (correctly) that water, in the cells of the carrot, moves into the column to dilute the syrup. [There is a sort of domino effect here with water from the cells adjacent to the cavity entering by osmosis through their cell walls. This increases the concentration of solutes in these cells and osmosis can occur from the next layer of cells into the first layer and so on through the entire thickness of the carrot until water from the beaker enters the cells on the very outside of the carrot.] Follow-up discussion: • Define and discuss osmosis and the concept of semipermeability. • Discuss Figures 8.2 and Figure 8.3 and the relationship between them (both involve mixing of one kind of molecules with another kind). Follow-up activities: • End of chapter problems 8.1 through 8.5. Section 8.2. Probability and Change Learning Objectives for Section 8.2 • Relate the relative probability of two outcomes to the number of ways each outcome can be achieved. Consider This 8.3. What is the probability of change? Goal: Assign and explain the assignment of numerical values to the probability of familiar changes. 12 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Classroom options: • Allow 3-5 minutes for students, working in small groups, to assign their values. Then, the groups can share their assignments and explanations with the class, summarizing them on the chalkboard or an overhead transparency. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. • This activity could be given as a homework assignment and discussed at the next class session. Time for activity: • 5-10 minutes. Instructor's notes: Students should reason and conclude: (a) 1: When we drop objects that are denser than air, our experience is that they always fall to the floor, due to their attraction to the Earth. (b) 0: We have never observed a solution of a solid that is soluble in the solvent becoming unmixed, that is, spontaneously separating into pure solute and solvent. (c) ≈0: If the room temperature is above 273 K, we never observe a glass of liquid water freezing, but, if it happens to be winter and you leave the window of the room open, it is possible that the room will cool to below 273 K and then the water could freeze. Since this would be a special case, we can consider it very unlikely, so the probability is near zero. (d) ≈1: The reasoning here is very much like that in part (c). If the room temperature is above 273 K, the ice cube will melt, but in the unlikely event that the temperature of your room goes below 273 K, the ice cube will not melt. (e) 0: We have never observed pieces of waste paper spontaneously moving from a wastebasket to the desktop. (f) ?: Sugars are quite soluble in water, but they do vary in their solubilities. In Chapter 2, Section 2, page 80, we were told that 200 g of table sugar, sucrose, will dissolve in 100 mL of water, but only 100 g of glucose will dissolve in 100 mL of water. Each of these sugars has a density of about 1.5 g·mL–1, so a given volume of sugar has a mass about 1.5 times greater than the mass of the same volume of water. Thus, if the sugar that we are dissolving is sucrose, a teaspoon of sugar (about 7.5 g) will all dissolve in a teaspoon of water (about 5 g). However, a teaspoon of glucose will not all dissolve in a teaspoon of water. The probability in this case depends on the identity of the sugar. Follow-up discussion: • Discussion should focus on the two key points from this section that are fundamental to the rest of the chapter: (1) if a system can exist in more than one observable state (mixed or unmixed, for example), any changes will be in the direction toward the state that is most probable; and (2) each distinguishably different molecular arrangement of a system is equally probable. • Try to be sure that students understand what distinguishable arrangements are and use this discussion as a lead-in to Investigate This 8.4, which opens the next section. Follow-up activities: • End of chapter problems 8.6 through 8.8. ACS Chemistry FROG 13 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Section 8.3. Counting Molecular Arrangements in Mixtures Learning Objectives for Section 8.3 • Relate the relative probability of two outcomes to the number of ways each outcome can be achieved. • Calculate the number of distinguishable arrangements of a small number of identical particles (molecules) among a limited number of distinguishable locations and relate the results to a solute-solvent mixing process. Investigate This 8.4. How are distinguishable arrangements counted? Goal: Determine how many distinguishable arrangements three objects can have among five boxes and (extended) three objects among six boxes. Set-up time: • Approximately 10-15 minutes to prepare sets of identical objects. Time for activity: • Approximately 10-15 minutes. Materials: • Gumdrops, paper clips, coins, or other sets of identical objects. Alternatively, just marking boxes in arrays drawn on a piece of paper will work and requires no preparation. Procedure: • Allow 5-8 minutes for students, working in small groups, to find their arrangements. Then, the groups can share their work with the class, summarizing the arrangements on the chalkboard or an overhead transparency. Results: • Ten distinguishable arrangements are possible: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Follow-up discussion: • Discussion may begin by deciding how the students know when all the distinguishable arrangements have been found. Several systematic approaches were probably used and can be explained. • The discussion should provide the lead-in to the mixing model and the concept of distinguishable molecular arrangements, W. Students should note that W is simply a number, a dimensionless quantity. 14 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Follow-up activities: • Students can find the number of distinguishable arrangements for three objects in six boxes. There are 20 distinguishable arrangements: • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • NOTE: These 20 arrangements are also shown for a different array of boxes in Figure 8.5 and the two sets could be compared to see that they are, indeed, the same. • End of chapter problems: 8.9-8.12. Section 8.4. Implications for Mixing and Osmosis in Macroscopic Systems Learning Objectives for Section 8.4 • Relate the relative probability of two outcomes to the number of ways each outcome can be achieved. • Relate osmosis to mixing and be able to explain both in terms of increasing number of distinguishable molecular arrangements. • Describe the conditions required for osmosis and predict the direction of osmosis. • Relate the results for countable systems to real systems. ACS Chemistry FROG 15 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Section 8.5. Energy Arrangements Among Molecules Learning Objectives for Section 8.5 • Determine the number of distinguishable arrangements of a small number of identical energy quanta among a limited number of distinguishable atoms. • Predict the direction and final outcome of energy transfer between two systems containing a countable number of energy quanta distributed among a countable number of distinguishable atoms. • Relate the results for countable systems to real systems. Investigate This 8.7. How is a different kind of distinguishable arrangement counted? Goal: Determine how to arrange two identical energy quanta among four distinguishable atoms in a solid and (extended) three energy quanta among four distinguishable atoms. Set-up time • Approximately 10 minutes to prepare packets of gum drops and toothpicks, if they are to be used. Time for activity: • From less than 10 minutes to 20 minutes depending upon the amount of discussion incorporated with the activity. Materials: • Gumdrops or other soft candies. • Toothpicks. NOTE: For distribution to small groups of students, place four gumdrops and two toothpicks in enough zip-closure plastic bags to supply your class. Alternatively, this can be a pencil-andpaper activity, as shown below and exemplified by Figure 8.8. Procedure: • As with Investigate This 8.4, allow students, working in small groups, 8-10 minutes to complete this activity. Then, the groups can share their work with the class, summarizing the arrangements on the chalkboard or an overhead transparency. • If gumdrops and toothpicks are not available, students can use "" to represent an atom and "()" to represent an energy quantum, as in Figure 8.8. Even more efficiently, the arrangements can be represented by numbers of quanta as shown in the right-hand column of the figure in the activity, in Figure 8.8, and the figures below. Anticipated results: • In this table, as in Figure 8.8, the "" represents an atom and each "()" represents an energy quantum. In terms of the activity with real objects, the "" represents a gumdrop and "()" represents toothpicks. There are 10 ways to distribute the two identical quanta among four distinguishable atoms: atom #1 atom #2 atom #3 atom #4 (()) (((((( (((((( (((((( (((((( (()) (((((( (((((( (((((( (((((( (()) (((((( (((( (((( (((((( (()) 16 ACS Chemistry FROG arrangement of quanta 2,0,0,0 0,2,0,0 0,0,2,0 0,0,0,2 Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization 1,1,0,0 0,1,1,0 0,0,1,1 1,0,1,0 1,0,0,1 0,1,0,1 () () (((((( (((((( (((((( () () (((((( (((((( (((((( () () () ((( () (((( () (((((( (((((( () (((((( () ((( () Follow-up discussion: • Discuss and remind students of the definition of energy quanta from Chapter 4. • Discuss the number of distinguishable arrangements that students found and, in particular, how they knew they had found all possible arrangements. • The discussion should be directed toward introducing a model for energy arrangements that leads to an understanding of the direction of energy transfer between objects. Follow-up activities: • As a challenge activity, students can find the number of distinguishable arrangements for three quanta among four atoms. The results (also see Figure 8.9) are: atom #1 atom #2 atom #3 atom #4 ((())) (((((( (((((( (((( (()) () (((((( (((((( (((((( (((((( (()) () (((((( (((((( (()) () () (((((( () () (((((( ((())) (((((( (((( () (()) (()) () (((((( (((((( (((((( (((((( (()) () (((((( (((((( () () ( (( () (((((( (((((( ((())) (((((( (((((( (((((( () (()) (()) () () (()) (((((( (((((( (((((( (((((( () () () ( (( (((((( (((((( (((((( ((())) (((((( (((((( (((((( (((((( () (()) (((((( (((((( () (()) () (()) (((((( () () () arrangement of quanta 3,0,0,0 0,3,0,0 0,0,3,0 0,0,0,3 2,1,0,0 1,2,0,0 0,2,1,0 0,1,2,0 0,0,2,1 0,0,1,2 2,0,1,0 1,0,2,0 0,2,0,1 0,1,0,2 2,0,0,1 1,0,0,2 1,1,1,0 0,1,1,1 1,0,1,1 1,1,0,1 • Worked Example 8.8. Energy transfer between solids with different energies. • Check This 8.9. Energy transfer from a cooler to a warmer solid. • End of chapter problems 8.16 through 8.19. ACS Chemistry FROG 17 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Section 8.6. Entropy Learning Objectives for Section 8.6 • Use the definition of entropy in terms of distinguishable arrangements to show how entropies for the parts of a system are additive while numbers of arrangements are multiplicative. • Combine positional and thermal entropy changes for a process in a system and its surroundings to determine the net entropy change for the process. Section 8.7. Phase Changes and Net Entropy Learning Objectives for Section 8.7 • Use the definition of entropy in terms of distinguishable arrangements to predict the relative entropies of different systems, for example, phases of matter or reactants and products of a reaction. • Combine positional and thermal entropy changes for a process in a system and its surroundings to determine the net entropy change for the process. • Use positional entropy changes and the relative thermal entropy changes for the same energy change at different temperatures to analyze and predict the direction of phase changes in pure compounds and solutions. • State the criterion for equilibrium in chemical systems and relate the state of equilibrium to the positional and thermal entropy changes occurring. • Connect the formation of organized collections of molecules to increases in positional and/or thermal entropy in the system and surroundings that drive the organization. Consider This 8.10. What are the relative probabilities of different phases? Goal: Extend knowledge of probability and change to phase changes. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, 3-5 minutes to complete this activity. Then, the groups can share their work with the class, summarizing their drawings on the chalkboard or an overhead transparency. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • Approximately 10 minutes. Instructor notes: • Remind the class about phase changes, which were introduced in Chapter 1. • The reasoning here involves only arrangements of particles (what we are calling positional entropy) and neglects the energy involved in the changes. If students recall the energy arguments from Chapter 1, use this as a lead-in to the remainder of the section, which is largely focused on the energy and thermal entropy changes. Students should reason and conclude: (a) The square representing the volume available to a solid phase molecule should be about the size of a molecule represented in the diagram. The square representing the volume available to a liquid phase molecule should be about the size of the array of liquid phase molecules represented in the diagram. The square representing the volume available to a gas phase molecule should be about the size of the array of gas phase molecules represented in the diagram and could be even larger, since gases expand to fill all of whatever container 18 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization they occupy. If number of molecular arrangements is proportional to the volume available to a molecule, then the gas phase has the largest number of arrangements available. The relative probabilities, based on number of arrangements available decreases in the order: gas phase > liquid phase > solid phase. (b) The animations and the interactive questions in the Web Companion, Chapter 8, Section 8.7, pages 1-3, reinforce the ideas stated in part (a). The solid has the smallest positional entropy (smallest number of molecular arrangements), because the volume available to each molecule is limited to a small fixed volume around its position in the lattice. For the gas molecules, the volume available is limited to the volume of the container. A gas, therefore, has the largest positional entropy (the largest number of molecular arrangements). Follow-up discussion: • Try to be sure that the class understands the dilemma posed by their conclusions in this activity, which so far ignore the energy associated with phase changes. Use the dilemma as a lead-in to discuss the role of thermal entropy in phase changes. Follow-up activities: • Check This 8.11. Direction of positional entropy changes. • Consider This 8.12. What happens in an ice-water mixture at different temperatures? • End of chapter problems 8.27 through 8.34. Consider This 8.12. What happens in an ice-water mixture at different temperatures? Goal: Based on their experience, students explain what occurs in an ice-water mixture at different temperatures and relate the results to the direction of energy transfer. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, 3-5 minutes to discuss their responses and then have the groups share them with the class. You could assign half the groups to part (a) and the other half to part (b). • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • From 5 to 15 minutes depending on how much of the preceding and succeeding ideas get incorporated in the discussion. Instructor notes: • In this activity students should connect phase changes with the enthalpy changes in the system and surroundings. • In the discussion, students should use the enthalpy changes in the surroundings (thermal reservoir—the block of metal) to reason about the direction of the entropy changes in the surroundings. Students should reason and conclude: (a) For T > 273 K, the ice in the ice-water mixture will melt. This means that energy must leave the block of metal and enter the ice-water mixture. [Since the surroundings lose energy, Ssurr < 0.] (b) For T < 273 K, the water in the ice-water mixture will freeze. This means that energy must leave the ice-water mixture and enter the block of metal. [Since the surroundings gain energy, Ssurr > 0.] ACS Chemistry FROG 19 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Follow-up discussion: • With the signs for the positional entropy change in the system (ice-water) and the thermal entropy change in the surroundings (block of metal), you can initiate the discussion of the net entropy change for ice melting and water freezing. • Show or refer students to Figure 8.11 to help direct the reasoning that leads to conclusions about the relative sizes of the positional and thermal entropy changes. Follow-up activities: • Check This 8.13. Net entropy change water for water freezing. • Consider This 8.14. How does thermal entropy change depend upon temperature? • Worked Example 8.15. Net entropy change for melting ice with surroundings at 283 K. • Check This 8.16. Net entropy change for freezing water with surroundings at 263 K. • Consider This 8.17. What are net entropy changes for ice and water changes at 273 K? • End of chapter problems 8.29 through 8.32. Consider This 8.14. How does thermal entropy change depend upon temperature? Goal: Use the data from Figure 8.9 to calculate changes in thermal entropy for changes in energy and attempt to deduce the form of the dependence of entropy change on the energy change and temperature. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, 5-7 minutes to begin their analyses and then have the groups share their results and reasoning with the class. Then the discussion can continue based on what the class determines to be correct reasoning. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • From 10 to 15 minutes. Instructor notes: • Show or direct students to Figure 8.9 while carrying out this activity. • Remind students about equation (8.6), S k lnW, the Boltzmann definition of entropy. • Indicate that they can find the Boltzmann constant (page 527 and inside back cover of the textbook), but do not have to carry out the arithmetic using it in this activity. NOTE: Entropy is related to W through the Boltzmann definition. The inclusion of energy (joules) in the units of entropy has nothing to do with what arrangements are being counted, whether it is particles among energy levels (the quantum mechanical approach to what we are calling positional entropy) or energy quanta among oscillators. The units arise through the definition, which is chosen to make the results from statistical thermodynamics identical to those from classical thermodynamics. There is no other rationale for the appearance of the Boltzmann constant. Students should reason and conclude: (a) Subscripts refer to the number of energy quanta in the solid. S10-9 = S9 – S10 = klnW9 – klnW10 = kln(W9/W10) = kln(220/286) = k(–0.262) = –0.262 k S5-4 = S4 – S5 = klnW4 – klnW5 = kln(W4/W5) = kln(35/56) = k(–0.470) = –0.470 k The change in entropy is larger for the four-atom solid losing one quantum of energy to go from 5 to 4 quanta. 20 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization (b) As shown in Worked Example 8.8, the temperature of an atomic solid depends on the number of energy quanta it has: the more quanta, the higher the temperature. Thus the solid that has 10 (or 9) quanta of energy has a higher temperature than the one with 5 (or 4) — T10 > T5. (c) The energy change for each system is E = –1 quantum (the solids lose energy, so the change is negative) and the change in entropy is also negative. From Figure 8.9, we observe that entropy (or W) increases as the energy increases (or decreases as energy decreases), so it seems likely that changes in entropy are directly related to changes in energy for this atomic solid: S E The entropy change for the higher temperature (T10) solid, S10-9, is smaller than the entropy change for the lower temperature (T5) solid, S5-4. Thus, it appears that the entropy change is inversely proportional to the temperature of the atomic solid: S 1/T Combining these two relationships, our analysis suggests that the relationship among the entropy change, energy change, and temperature at which the change occurs might be: S E/T Follow-up discussion: • Try to make sure the class understands that the change in number of quanta in this problem is what we perceive as a thermal energy change in macroscopic systems. • Use part (c) to initiate discussion of how the thermal entropy change is expressed as a function of the energy (enthalpy) change of the thermal reservoir and its temperature. Follow-up activities: • Worked Example 8.15. Net entropy change for melting ice with surroundings at 283 K. • Check This 8.16. Net entropy change for freezing water with surroundings at 263 K. • Consider This 8.17. What are net entropy changes for ice and water changes at 273 K? • End of chapter problems 8.29 through 8.36. Consider This 8.17. What are net entropy changes for ice and water changes at 273 K? Goal: Calculate the net entropy changes for melting ice and freezing water at 273 K and find that they are both zero. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, approximately 5-7 minutes to answer the questions and then the groups can share their results and reasoning with the class. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • Approximately 10-15 minutes leading to the criterion for equilibrium. Instructor notes: • Conduct this activity after students have studied Worked Example 8.15 and done Check This 8.16. The calculations here are identical to the ones in these activities. The extension here is to the equilibrium temperature for the phase change and the finding that Snet = 0 for both the freezing and melting processes. That is, the reaction is not spontaneous in either direction at the equilibrium temperature. Students should reason and conclude: (a) The calculations are just as in Worked Example 8.15, except that here T = 273 K: ACS Chemistry FROG 21 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Ssystem = S°sl = 22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 3 –1 H surr –6.00 10 J mol Ssurr = = = –22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 273 K T surr Snet = Ssystem + Ssurr = 22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 + (–22.0 J·K–1·mol–1) = 0.0 J·K–1·mol–1 The net entropy change is not greater than zero, so you would not expect the ice to melt. (b) The calculations are just as in Check This 8.16, except that here T = 273 K: Ssystem = S°la = –22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 3 –1 H surr 6.00 10 J mol Ssurr = = = 22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 273 K T surr Snet = Ssystem + Ssurr = –22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 + 22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 = 0.0 J·K–1·mol–1 The net entropy change is not greater than zero, so you would not expect the water to freeze. [The results from parts (a) and (b) show that neither the ice nor the water is favored at 273 K. An ice-water system is in equilibrium at this temperature.] Follow-up discussion: • Discuss phase equilibria and the fact there is no driving force for change in either direction at the equilibrium temperature. Follow-up activities: • End of chapter problems 8.34 through 8.40. Section 8.8. Gibbs Free Energy Learning Objectives for Section 8.8 • State the criterion for equilibrium in chemical systems and relate the state of equilibrium to the positional and thermal entropy changes occurring. • Explain the relationship of Gibbs free energy change to net entropy change for a process and use the sign and/or magnitude of either one to predict whether the process is possible, not possible, or in equilibrium. • Calculate the free energy change for a process in a system using values for the enthalpy and entropy changes for the process. Section 8.9. Thermodynamic Calculations for Chemical Reactions Learning Objectives for Section 8.9 • Use the definition of entropy in terms of distinguishable arrangements to predict the relative entropies of different systems, for example, phases of matter or reactants and products of a reaction. • Distinguish between positional and thermal entropy changes for a process and combine them to determine net entropy change for the process. • Explain the relationship of Gibbs free energy change to net entropy change for a process and use the sign and/or magnitude of either one to predict whether the process is possible, not possible, or in equilibrium. • Use standard enthalpies and standard free energies of formation, and standard entropies (from tabulated values) to calculate the standard enthalpy, free energy, and entropy changes for a reaction. 22 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Section 8.10. Why Oil and Water Don’t Mix Learning Objectives for Section 8.10 • Use the definition of entropy in terms of distinguishable arrangements to predict the relative entropies of different systems, for example, solutions and separated solute and solvent. • Distinguish between positional and thermal entropy changes for a process and combine them to determine net entropy change for the process. • Explain in words, equations, diagrams, and/or molecular-level sketches the origin and direction of positional and thermal entropy changes for dissolving ionic and molecular solutes in water and predict the observable outcomes. Investigate This 8.35. What happens when oil and water are mixed? Goal: Compare the results of mixing oil and water to the results of mixing oil, water and detergent. Set-up time: • Approximately 10-15 minutes to prepare a set of materials and reagents for each group, if you are going to have groups do the activity. Use a paper or plastic cup for each set, so spills are minimized when the sets are collected after use, and include a paper towel or napkin with each set. Time for activity: • Less than 10 minutes. Materials: • One small test tube. • Three thin-stem plastic pipets. Reagents: • Cooking oil (clear, pale yellow) in a labeled thin-stem plastic pipet. • Water in a labeled thin-stem plastic pipet. • Liquid dishwashing detergent in a labeled thin-stem plastic pipet. Procedure: • Either pass out sets of materials and reagents to small groups or ask for a student volunteer to do the activity for the class. Give the following instructions: • Place a few milliliters of water in the test tube. • Add about 0.5 mL of oil. • Cap the tube with a finger and mix by inverting several times. • Allow the tube to sit for several seconds. • Note your observations. • Add about 0.5 mL of the detergent to the test tube. • Cap the tube with your finger and mix by inverting several times. (Try not to create a lot of suds.) • Allow the tube to sit for several seconds. • Note your observations. NOTE: This activity can be scaled up for larger classrooms or projected via video. Anticipated results: • (a) When the oil and water are mixed and allowed to stand, the oil (top layer) and water (bottom layer) will form two distinct layers. The size of the layers helps identify the oil and water. ACS Chemistry FROG 23 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 • (b) After adding detergent and mixing, the two layers disappear and one, emulsified solution is observed. The solution should appear homogeneous (the same appearance throughout), but will probably not be clear, since the detergent-oil micelles will scatter light and make the solution opalescent. The thing to draw to students’ attention is that there are no longer two layers. Follow-up discussion: • Use Consider This 8.36 to initiate discussion of the results of this activity. • Show or refer students to Figure 8.16 to help explain how water molecules orient themselves, linking back to positional entropy change. Follow-up activities: • End of chapter problems 8.60 through 8.62. Consider This 8.36. Why don't oil and water mix? Goal: Reformulate the unfavorable-arrangements-of-water-molecules explanation (Chapter 2, Sections 2.1 and 2.2) for the insolubility of nonpolar compounds in terms of entropy. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, 3-4 minutes to construct their explanations and then have the groups share them with the class to begin discussion. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • Approximately 10 minutes. Instructor notes: • Review the results from Investigate This 2.5 as well as the succeeding discussion of the insolubility of nonpolar solutes in water. Students should reason and conclude: The overall positional entropy change is negative for dissolving oil in water. If the nonpolar oil molecules are mixed with water molecules, the water molecules group around the nonpolar molecules and the water molecules' motions are restricted. Thus fewer molecular arrangements are possible, reducing the entropy of the water molecules. When the oil separates from the water, the water molecules are free to move about as usual and the entropy of the water molecules increases. Follow-up discussion: • Discuss Figure 8.16, focusing on how water molecules orient themselves around non-polar solutes. NOTE: Knowledge of the orientation of water molecules around ions and at interfaces (between water and air and water and nonpolar molecules) is growing as more techniques for studying the interactions experimentally become available and computational models become better. The authors of one study, “Water at Hydrophobic Surfaces: Weak Hydrogen Bonding and Strong Orientation Effects,” L. F. Scatena, M. G, Brown, and G. L. Richmond, Science 2001, 292, 908912 (4 May 2001), say, “Vibrational studies that selectively probe molecular structure at CCl4/H2O and hydrocarbon/H2O interfaces show that the hydrogen bonding between adjacent water molecules at these interfaces is weak… However, interactions between these water molecules and the organic phase result in substantial orientation of these weakly hydrogenbonded molecules in the interfacial region.” This finding is consistent with the idea that the driving force in the interaction of water with hydrophilic fluid surfaces (such as proteins, 24 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization membranes, and micelles) is a large entropy loss (when the water is associated with the hydrophobic molecules) due to enhanced structuring of water in the immediate vicinity of apolar molecules, biological macromolecules, and hydrophobic surfaces. The “enhanced structuring” may be orientation caused by interaction with the hydrophobic molecules, rather than a more ice-like structure for the water molecules in the vicinity of the hydrophobic molecules, as is often assumed in models of these interactions. This study looked at the vibrational spectra of water, in particular the O–H bonds and interpreted them as being in several different environments, as shown in the figure below. In the figure, hydrogen-bonding interactions of O–H with other water molecules are shown as dashed lines and interactions with the hydrophobic molecules (CCl4 in this case) are dotted. (“Free OH” in the diagram means not hydrogen bonded to another water.) The infrared absorptions attributed to each environment are shown below the drawing; these were used to analyze the experimental data and determine the relative numbers of water molecules at the interface that were in each environment. Follow-up Activities: • End of chapter problems 8.60 through 8.62. Section 8.11. Ambiphilic Molecules: Micelles and Bilayer Membranes Learning Objectives for Section 8.11 • Use the definition of entropy in terms of distinguishable arrangements to predict the relative entropies of different systems, for example, solutions of hydrophobic molecules in water. • Explain in words, equations, diagrams, and/or molecular-level sketches the origin and direction of positional and thermal entropy changes for formation of micelles and phospholipid bilayer membranes by ambiphilic molecules. • Use words and/or molecular level sketches to describe the structure and properties of micelles, bilayer membranes, and liposomes. ACS Chemistry FROG 25 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 • Connect the formation of organized collections of molecules to increases in positional and/or thermal entropy in the system and surroundings that drive the organization. Investigate This 8.37. How does light interact with solutions? Goal: Compare what is observed when a beam of light passes through a sugar solution and a detergent solution. Set-up time: • 15 minutes, if the solutions are prepared before class, or less than 5 minutes, if you prepare the solutions in class. Time for activity: • Less than 5 minutes. Materials: • 2 transparent, colorless plastic or glass containers. One possibility is 2-liter clear, colorless plastic soda bottles with the top 1/3 of the bottles removed, as shown in the set-up below. • 2 Stirrers. • "Maglite®" type flashlight or other source of a beam of light. A laser pointer will work. • Ring stand with clamp to hold the light source. Reagents: • Table sugar. • Liquid detergent or soap. • Water. Procedure: • You can prepare both solutions before class, but this lessens the impact of the activity, which is enhanced by seeing how little detergent is required to produce enough micelles to make the solution scatter light quite well. • To one container, add about a teaspoon of sugar. Fill the container with water. Use a stirrer to mix the solution. • To the other container, add one drop of detergent. Fill the container with water. Use a different stirrer to mix the solution very gently, so as not to produce any foam. Although the stirrer used for the sugar could be used to stir the detergent solution, you do not want to use the detergent stirrer for the sugar. It is best simply to have two stirrers, one for each solution and not mix them up. • Allow both solutions to sit undisturbed for several minutes. If the solutions are made before class, they will need to sit undisturbed again after being transported to class. • Set up a container and light source as shown below. • Darken the room and direct a narrow beam of light through one of the solutions from the side. Use a small flashlight with a focused beam or a larger flashlight with the lens masked so only a small beam of light escapes. Have a student volunteer observe from the top of the solution. Repeat the observation with the other solution. Placing both solutions in the light beam, with the sugar solution preceding the detergent solution, produces a nice effect. Anticipated results: • These photographs show the set up of light source and solution and top and side views of the light beam passing through the container of detergent solution. 26 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization set up top view side view • The sugar solution will show the same scattering by the container surfaces (bright spots in these photos), but will show no light scattering by the solution. The light beam will not be visible in the solution. Follow-up discussion: • Use Consider This 8.38 to initiate discussion of the results of this activity. Follow-up activities: • Check This 8.39. Evidence for micelle formation. • Consider This 8.40. How do ambiphilic molecules interact with nonpolar solutes • Consider This 8.41. How do the properties of bilayer membranes help explain osmosis? • End of chapter problems 8.68 through 8.73. Consider This 8.38. What causes light to interact with a solution? Goal: Conclude that the detergent solution in Investigate This 8.37 contains clumps of solute molecules that scatter light, but the sugar solution does not. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, 3-4 minutes to discuss their interpretation and then have groups share their conclusions with the class. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • About 5-10 minutes. Instructor notes: • Show or refer students to Figure 8.19 that displays different representations of a detergent molecule. These can be used to discuss the structure of these molecules with hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts, leading into micelle formation and phospholipid bilayers. • Remind students that they have seen ambiphilic molecules before in Chapter 2, Section 2.2, Investigate This 2.5 (reference incorrectly given as 2.3 in the text), where we found they had limited water solubility. Students should reason and conclude: When the beam of light passed through the sugar solution, the light beam was essentially invisible, because all the light rays continued straight through the solution without interference. When the light beam passed through the detergent solution, the beam was easily seen, because something was causing some of the rays of light to be scattered toward your eyes instead of continuing straight through the solution. Possibly the detergent molecules clump together to form large enough particles to interfere with and scatter the light. This light ACS Chemistry FROG 27 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 scattering is called the “Tyndall effect” and is used to study solutions of large biological molecules, polymers, and solutions in which the molecules clump, as here. Follow-up discussion: • Use the molecular structure of a detergent molecule shown in Figure 8.19 to lead into the discussion of micelles. Follow-up activities: • Check This 8.39. Evidence for micelle formation. • Consider This 8.40. How do ambiphilic molecules interact with nonpolar solutes? • Consider This 8.41. How do the properties of bilayer membranes help explain osmosis? • End of chapter problems 8.68 through 8.73. Consider This 8.40. How do ambiphilic molecules interact with nonpolar solutes? Goal: Sketch a model of the interactions between water, ambiphilic detergent, and oil molecules that is based on knowledge of micelle formation and the results from Investigate This 8.35(b). Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, approximately 5 minutes to complete this activity and then have groups share their sketches with the class on the chalkboard or overhead transparencies. • This activity could also be assigned as homework and discussed at the next class session. Time for activity: • About 10 minutes. Instructor notes: • Show or refer students to Figure 8.19 for different examples of detergent molecule representations as they are doing this activity. Students should sketch a drawing similar to: Follow-up discussion: • The discussion should focus on how detergents work. • Then, lead into phospholipid bilayers and how molecules are transported through these bilayers. 28 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Follow-up activities: • Consider This 8.41. How do the properties of bilayer membranes help explain osmosis? • End of chapter problems 8.68 through 8.73. Consider This 8.41. How do the properties of bilayer membranes help explain osmosis? Goal: Relate osmosis (Investigate This 8.1), which requires a semipermeable membrane, to the relative permeabilities of the bilayer membranes that surround all cells. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, about 3 minutes to formulate their explanations and then have groups share them with the class. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. • This activity could also be assigned as homework and discussed at the next class session. Time for activity: • About 7-10 minutes. Instructor notes: • If necessary review the set up and results of Investigate This 8.1 and the concept of osmosis. • Show or refer students to Table 8.1 as they carry out this activity and discussion. Students should reason and conclude: It is clear from Table 8.1 that water has the highest relative membrane permeability of all the substances shown. Thus, we can consider lipid bilayer membranes as semipermeable (highly permeable to water, but not to solutes in water, such as sugars). Semipermeable lipid bilayer membranes through which water can pass relatively easily surround the cells in a carrot. The cells next to the cavity in the carrot, Investigate This 8.1, contain solutes at lower a concentration than the concentrated sugars in the syrup, so water passes from the cells into the cavity, increasing the volume of syrup, which we observe as a rise in the liquid level in the external column connected to the cavity. As these cells lose water to the cavity, the solutes in them become more concentrated and osmosis can occur from the next layer of cells to dilute the solution in the first layer, and so on and on until osmosis moves water from the beaker into the outer layer of cells. Follow-up activities: • End of Chapter problems 8.72 and 8.73. Section 8.12. Colligative Properties of Solutions Learning Objectives for Section 8.12 • Use the definition of entropy in terms of distinguishable arrangements to predict the relative entropies of different systems, for example, phases of matter or reactants and products of a reaction. • Find the positional and thermal entropy changes for a process and combine them to determine net entropy change for the process. • Use positional entropy changes and the relative thermal entropy changes for the same energy change at different temperatures to analyze and predict the direction of phase changes in pure compounds and solutions. • Calculate freezing point lowering and boiling point elevation for solutions. • Use experimental values for colligative properties to determine the concentration of solutes in the solution and/or the molar mass of the solute. ACS Chemistry FROG 29 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Investigate This 8.42. What is the freezing point of salt water? Goal: Compare the freezing point of an ice-salt-water mixture with the temperature of an ice-water mixture. Set-up time: • Approximately 10 minutes. Time for activity: • About 5-10 minutes. Materials: • 250-mL beaker. • Wooden stirrer. • Thermometer or temperature probe whose reading can be projected. Reagents: • Crushed ice. • Water • Approximately 90 g of Kosher salt, NaCl, or coarsely crushed rock salt. Table salt and reagent grade sodium chloride tend to clump and be hard to mix with the ice-water mixture. Procedure: • Use two student volunteers to carry out the activity. One will hold the beaker, add the ice, water and salt, and stir the mixture and the other will hold the thermometer or probe in the mixture and read the thermometer. Direct the students to carry out these actions. • Fill the beaker with ice and add the water. • Use the stirrer to stir the mixture vigorously. • Insert the thermometer in the mixture. • When the temperature of the mixture is constant for about 30 seconds (while being more gently stirred), read and record (all students) the temperature. • Remove the thermometer, add the salt, and continue vigorous stirring for 2-3 minutes. • Insert the thermometer in the middle of the mixture and read and record (all students) the temperature. Clean-up: • Dispose mixture down the drain. Anticipated results: • Temperature reading of the ice-water mixture: 0 °C. • Temperature reading of the ice-salt-water mixture: about –15 °C. Follow-up discussion: • Use Consider This 8.43 to initiate discussion of the results of this activity. Follow-up activities: • Worked Example 8.44--Determining a freezing point lowering constant. • Check This 8.45--Determining molar mass of a solute from freezing point lowering. • Worked Example 8.46--Freezing point lowering by an ionic solute. • Consider This 8.47--Is the entropy change larger for boiling a solution or pure solvent? • Check This 8.48--Boiling point of a solution. • End of chapter problems: 8.69-8.81. 30 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Consider This 8.43. How does salt affect the freezing point of water? Goal: Consider how to relate the lower freezing point of an ice-water-salt solution to the difference in entropy between a salt solution and pure water. Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, approximately 5 minutes to consider the possible relationship between the temperature lowering and the different entropies of the water and solution and then have groups share their suggestions with the class. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion. Time for activity: • From 10 to 20 minutes, depending on how much of the entropy analysis you wish to incorporate in the discussion. Instructor notes: • Be sure the class agrees on the results from Investigate This 8.42. • Discuss what the solid is that is formed when an aqueous salt solution begins to freeze. Many, perhaps most, students will not know that the solid is pure water ice. Since this knowledge is a key to understanding the analysis of this (and other colligative properties), it’s important that students get it before thinking about the results of Investigate This 8.42. Students should reason and conclude: (a) Before adding the salt, the temperature was approximately 0 °C, but once the salt was added, the temperature dropped to about –15 °C. (b) The entropy of the salt solution is greater than the entropy of pure water. The entropy of the solid water formed by freezing is the same in both cases. Since the entropy of the solution is higher than the entropy of the pure solvent, the positional entropy change for freezing ice from the solution will be greater than that for freezing from the pure solvent. More analysis is necessary to figure out how this will affect the temperature of the freezing process. Follow-up discussion: • Discuss the positional entropy change for freezing solid from a pure solvent such as water with the positional entropy change for freezing the same pure solid from a solution. Show or refer students to Figure 8.26 as a graphical representation of the difference\. • Use this discussion as an introduction to colligative properties and lead eventually to how we quantify freezing point lowering. Follow-up Activities: • Worked Example 8.44. Determining a freezing point lowering constant. • Check This 8.45. Determining molar mass of a solute from freezing point lowering. • Worked Example 8.46. Freezing point lowering by an ionic solute. • Consider This 8.47. Is the entropy change larger for boiling a solution or pure solvent? • Check This 8.48. Boiling point of a solution. • End of chapter problems 8.69 through 8.81. Consider This 8.48. Is the entropy change larger for boiling a solution or pure solvent? Goal: Extend knowledge of colligative properties to include an entropy analysis of boiling point elevation. ACS Chemistry FROG 31 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Classroom options: • Allow students, working in small groups, 5-7 minutes to sketch the entropy level diagram and consider the implications for the difference in boiling points of a pure solvent and solution of nonvolatile solute and then have groups share their suggestions with the class. • This activity could be conducted as an open class discussion, although it is better for assessment purposes to see how students do in their groups. Time for activity: • About 10-15 minutes. Instructor notes: • Show or refer students to Figure 8.26, so they can use it as a guide to draw a similar figure for boiling point elevation. • Show or refer students to equation (8.36), so they have the relationships, Sgas > Ssolution > Ssolvent, in front of them as they think about this analysis. Students should reason and conclude: (a) The relationships in expression (8.36) are represented on this entropy-level diagram. (b) The diagram in part (a) shows us that Ssolventgas > Ssolutiongas. An analysis like that for freezing point lowering again begins by setting the free energy equal to zero (equilibrium) in the relationship to enthalpy, entropy, and temperature to yield: Hsolventgas = (Tsolventgas)Ssolventgas Hsolutiongas = (Tsolutiongas)Ssolutiongas Equating the enthalpy changes and rearranging the equation gives: Ssolvent gas Tsolutiongas = Ssolutiongas Tsolvent gas We know from the diagram that the ratio Ssolvent gas Ssolutiongas > 1, so Tsolutiongas Tsolvent gas > 1, which means that (Tsolutiongas) > (Tsolventgas). Thus the boiling point of the solution is higher than the boiling point of the pure solvent. The affect of the solute is to raise the boiling point. 32 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Follow-up Discussion: • Use the discussion to introduce equation (8.37), Tbp = kbpm, the boiling point elevation relationship analogous to the one for freezing point lowering. Follow-up Activities: • Check This 8.48. Boiling point of a solution. • End of chapter problems 8.69 through 8.81. Section 8.13. Osmotic Pressure Calculations Learning Objectives for Section 8.13 • Calculate osmotic pressures for solutions. • Use experimental values for osmotic pressure to determine the concentration of solutes in the solution and/or the molar mass of the solute. Section 8.14. The Cost of Molecular Organization Learning Objectives for Section 8.14 • Connect the formation of organized collections of molecules to increases in positional and/or thermal entropy in the system and surroundings that drive the organization, specifically to the organization of life on Earth related to the entropy increase of the Sun. Section 8.16. Extension—Thermodynamics of Rubber Learning Objectives for Section 8.16 • Distinguish between positional and thermal entropy changes for a process and combine them to determine net entropy change for the process. • Predict the direction of the positional entropy change(s) that must occur to produce the observed effects of heating or cooling a system, such as a rubber band. Worksheet on Section 8.12 and Rubber-Band Thermodynamics The following worksheet was contributed by Dr. Laura Eisen, Mount Vernon College of George Washington University, Washington, DC. Some editing has been done to tighten up spacing, but none of the content has been changed. How does freezing of a solution compare to freezing of the pure solvent? Solid Pure Solvent Solution Which has the highest entropy of the three? _______. Which has the lowest entropy?________ Label the three lines (solid, solvent, solution) on the figure below. Draw an arrow (labeled S) representing the entropy change when pure solvent freezes. Draw an arrow (labeled S*) representing the entropy change when the solution freezes. Which change has the larger magnitude? [Note that when the "solution" freezes, it is actually only the solvent that "freezes" out.] ACS Chemistry FROG 33 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 S Is the ratio S/S* ( = Ssolventsolid/Ssolutionsolid) <1, = 1, or > 1? I. For freezing of pure solvent: Gsolventsolid = Hsolventsolid – T Ssolventsolid. When T = Tm (the normal melting/freezing point of the solvent) how are Hsolventsolid and Ssolventsolid related? Write an expression relating Hsolventsolid, Tm, and Ssolventsolid. II. For freezing of solution: Gsolutionsolid = Hsolutionsolid – TSsolutionsolid. Write an expression relating Hsolutionsolid, Tm*, and Ssolutionsolid, where Tm* is the freezing point of the solution. Since it is actually the solvent that freezes in both cases, Hsolventsolid = Hsolutionsolid. Use this fact to find a relationship among Tm, Tm*, Ssolventsolid, and Ssolutionsoli. Rearrange this to express the ratio Tm*/Tm. Is Tm* < Tm, = Tm, or > Tm? (In other words, is the freezing point of the solution less than, equal to, or greater than the freezing point of the pure solvent?) Rubber-Band Thermodynamics (This is to be done after completing Investigate This 8.54) The rubber band can be considered to exist in one of two states: relaxed (R) or stretched (S) For R S is H > 0, < 0 or = 0? How do you know? For S R is H > 0, < 0 or = 0? How do you know? For R S is G > 0, < 0 or = 0? How do you know? For S R is G > 0, < 0 or = 0? How do you know? For R S is S > 0, < 0 or = 0? How do you know? For S R is S > 0, < 0 or = 0? How do you know? Is spontaneous relaxation of a stretched rubber band driven by entropy or enthalpy? 34 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Solutions for Chapter 8 Check This Activities Check This 8.5. Unmixing This screen from the Web Companion, Chapter 8, Section 8.3, page 6, shows the animation after it has been played, beginning with the mixed solution with 455 possible distinguishable arrangements of the water and dye molecules. As the animation plays, the dye molecules are allowed to occupy fewer and fewer of the boxes, that is, they are aggregating together and end up all together in the top three boxes. The dye and water have unmixed. As this occurs, the number of distinguishable arrangements decreases, that is, the state become less probable. Thus, this animation represents a process in which the number of distinguishable arrangements decreases: a process that is unfavorable. Check This 8.6. Transfer of solvent from solution to pure solvent If three solvent molecules pass from the solution side to the solvent side of the membrane, the volume (number of boxes) available to the 3 solute molecules in the solution will be 6. We know from Figure 8.7 that the number of ways of arranging these solute molecules is W = 20. The number of ways of arranging the solvent molecules is W = 1 in the solution and also in the pure solvent. Thus, W will decrease from 84 to 20 for the solution and remain the same for the pure solvent. Since there is a decrease in W for this reverse osmosis, we would not expect to observe this process. In reverse osmosis, solvent molecules move from a less concentrated region (solution) to a more concentrated region (pure solute) and this, as we know is an unfavorable process. See Problems 8.84 through 8.86 for further insights into reverse osmosis, after studying Section 8.13. Check This 8.9. Energy transfer from a cooler to a warmer solid The number of distinguishable arrangements for the initial state of this two-solid system is Wi = W2·W6 = 10·84 = 840, where the numeric subscripts refer to the number of quanta in each identical 4 atom solid. The number of distinguishable arrangements for the final state is Wf = W1·W7 = 4·120 = 480 ACS Chemistry FROG 35 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 The imagined process is not favored because the number of distinguishable arrangements in the final state is lower than in the initial state. This process corresponds to a transfer of thermal energy from a cooler to a warmer object. We do not observe a warm object getting warmer when it is placed in contact with a cooler object. Check This 8.11. Direction of positional entropy changes (a) Ice melting is accompanied by an increase in positional entropy. The liquid has more distinguishable arrangements than the solid. (b) Forming a cloud of tiny liquid water droplets from water vapor is accompanied by a decrease in positional entropy. Water vapor in the air (a gas) has many more distinguishable arrangements than the liquid water droplets found in a cloud. (c) When equal volumes of ethanol and water are mixed, there is an increase in positional entropy. In the mixture, each liquid has about twice the original volume to move about in. (Actually, a mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and water has a volume about 5% less than the total of the original volumes.) (d) In transferring water from a graduated cylinder to a beaker, the positional entropy remains the same. There is no change in the volume of the liquid. (Changing the shape of the liquid sample does not change its volume.) (e) The positional entropy increases as a piece of solid dry ice sublimes to form carbon dioxide gas. There is a phase change from a solid to a gas, thus greatly increasing the distinguishable arrangements of the carbon dioxide molecules. (f) In forming polyethylene from ethene molecules, the positional entropy decreases. Individual ethene molecules have many more distinguishable arrangements than a polymerized chain of polyethylene where the molecular units are not free to move independently of one another, so effectively have lower volumes to move in. Check This 8.13. Net entropy change for water freezing At T < 273 K, liquid water will freeze, so energy will leave the ice-water mixture and enter the block of metal (surroundings). Thus, the energy of the metal increases and Ssurr ls > 0, as shown by the upward pointing red arrow for the thermal entropy change in Figure 8.12. Ice has fewer distinguishable arrangements than water, so the positional entropy of the system, the icewater mixture, decreases when freezing occurs: Ssys ls < 0. This is shown in Figure 8.12 by the downward pointing blue arrow representing the positional entropy change. (b) In order for Snet ls = Ssys ls + Ssurr ls > 0, we must have |Ssurr ls| > |Ssys ls|, so that the combination of positive Ssurr ls and negative Ssys ls is positive. Check This 8.16. Net entropy change for freezing water with surroundings at 263 K At 263 K, liquid water will freeze, so energy will leave the ice-water mixture and enter the block of metal. The thermal entropy of the block (surroundings) will increase: 3 –1 H surr 6.00 10 J mol Ssurr = = = 22.8 J·mol–1·K–1 T 263 K The positional entropy change for the system, water freezing to ice is: Ssyst = S°ls = –22.0 J·K–1·mol–1 Thus, we have: Snet = Ssyst + Ssurr = (–22.0 J·K–1·mol–1) + (22.8 J·mol–1·K–1) = 0.8 J·mol–1·K–1 36 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization This positive value for the net entropy change predicts that this process is spontaneous and will be observed. We know that liquid water in thermal contact with surroundings at T < 273 K will freeze, so this prediction is borne out by our observation of freezing water. Check This 8.19. Formation of N2O4(g) under standard conditions at 350 K The net entropy change for the formation of N2O4(g) from NO2(g) under standard conditions at 350 K (using values for H°system and S°system from Worked Example 8.18) is: –57.2 10 3 J Hsystem –1 –1 –1 Snet = Sºsystem – = –175.8 J·K – = –175.8 J·K + 163.4 J·K 350 K T Snet = –12.4 J·K–1 Since Snet < 0, the formation reaction is not spontaneous (not favored) at 350 K. This result is different than the conclusion reached in Worked Example 8.18 where we found the reaction to be favored at a lower temperature. See the discussion of the result in Worked Example 8.18 to see why this is the case. Check This 8.20. Criterion for direction of change We know that Snet increases (is positive) for reactions that are spontaneous and decreases (is negative) for reactions that are not spontaneous. Since temperature, T, is always positive, – TSnet will be negative when Snet is positive and vice versa. Therefore, –TSnet is negative for reactions that are spontaneous and positive for reactions that are not spontaneous. Check This 8.22. Free energy change for urea formation at 325 K The standard free energy change for the formation of urea at 325 K (using values for H°system and S°system from Worked Example 8.21) is: G° = H°system – TS°system = –133.3 103 J – (325 K)·(–424 J·K–1) = 4.5 kJ G = +4.5 kJ. Our conclusion is the same as in Check This 8.18. The reaction will not proceed under standard conditions because the free energy change is positive. Check This 8.24. Significance of the graphical relationship of H°, TS°, and G° vs. T At the point where the H° and TS° lines cross in Figure 8.13, these functions exactly cancel one another, H° – TS° = 0, and the free energy change is zero, as shown in the figure. At this point, the net entropy change is zero and there is no driving “force” in either direction -- the ice and water are in equilibrium. The crossing occurs at 273 K, the normal melting/freezing point of ice/water. At temperatures higher than 273 K, TSo > Ho and the ice to water change is possible: G° = – TS°net < 0 (negative). At temperatures lower than 273 K, TS° < H° and the ice to water change is impossible: G° = – TS°net > 0 (positive). Check This 8.25. The melting point of benzene The standard enthalpy and entropy changes for the freezing of liquid benzene are: H°freeze = H°f[C6H6(s)] – H°f[C6H6(l)] = (38.4 kJ·mol–1) – (49.0 kJ·mol–1) H°freeze = –10.6 kJ·mol–1 S°freeze = S°[C6H6(s)] – S°[C6H6(l)] = (135 J·K–1·mol–1) – (173 J·K–1·mol–1) S°freeze = –38 J·K–1·mol–1 Rearranging equation (8.23), which gives the relationship among, T, H°, and S° for a phase change at its equilibrium temperature, we get: ACS Chemistry FROG 37 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 H T= So So for freezing liquid benzene under standard conditions, we have: o –1 H freeze –10.6 10 J mol Tfreeze = = = 279 K o –38 J K –1 mol –1 S freeze The freezing point probably should be given to only two significant figures (± about 2%), 280 K, because the change in entropy is only known to this accuracy. This calculated value is very close to the experimental value of 278.5 K given in Table 8.1. o 3 Check This 8.27. Predict the direction of the entropy change for glucose fermentation We expect the entropy change for glucose fermentation to be positive and relatively large since the products are two moles of liquid and two moles of gas produced by one mole of solid reactant. The products will have many more distinguishable arrangements than the solid reactant. Check This 8.28. Entropy change for glucose fermentation We use equation (8.24) to find the standard entropy change for glucose fermentation from the values in Appendix B: S°reaction = [nj(S°)j]products – [nj(S°)j]reactants S°reaction = {[(2 mol C2H5OH)(160.7 J·K–1·mol–1)] + [(2 mol CO2)(213.7 J·K–1·mol– 1 )]} – [(1 mol C6H12O6)(212.1 J·K–1·mol–1)] S°reaction = 536.7 J·K–1 The calculated value for S°reaction is large and positive, which agrees with our prediction in Check This 8.27. Check This 8.30. Free energy change for fermentation of glucose We will use equation (7.30) to find the standard enthalpy change for glucose fermentation from the values in Appendix B and combine this with the standard entropy change from Check This 8.28 to find the standard free energy change for glucose fermentation. H°reaction = [nj(Hf°)j]products – [nj(Hf°)j]reactants H°reaction = {[(2 mol C2H5OH)(–277.7 kJ·mol–1)] + [(2 mol CO2)(–393.5 kJ·mol–1)]} – [(1 mol C6H12O6)(–1274.4 kJ·mol–1)] H°reaction = –68.0 kJ Hence, Greaction = H°reaction – TS°reaction = –68.0 103 J – (298 K)(536.7 J·K–1) Greaction = –227.9 kJ We expect this reaction to proceed under standard conditions due to the large, negative value for Greaction. Check This 8.32. Free energy change for fermentation of glucose We use equation (8.26) to find the standard free energy change for glucose fermentation from the values in Appendix B: 38 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization G°reaction = [nj(G°f)j]products – [nj(G°f)j]reactants G°reaction = {[(2 mol C2H5OH)(–174.78 kJ·mol–1)] + [(2 mol CO2)(–394.36 kJ·mol– 1 )]} – [(1 mol C6H12O6)(–910.52 kJ·mol–1)] G°reaction = –227.76 kJ Within the likely experimental uncertainties of the data, this value is essentially identical to our result in Check This 8.30. This should not be too surprising, because the values in Appendix B are supposed to be internally consistent. Check This 8.34. Free energy change for dissolving barium carbonate (a) The standard enthalpy and entropy changes for dissolving barium carbonate, BaCO3(s) in water are: H°reaction = {[(1 mol Ba2+(aq))(–537.6 kJ·mol–1)] + [(1 mol CO32–(aq))(–677.1 kJ·mol–1)]} – [(1 mol BaCO3(s))(–1216.3 kJ·mol–1)] H°reaction = –1.5 kJ S°reaction = {[(1 mol Ba2+(aq))(9.6 J·K–1·mol–1)] + [(1 mol CO32–(aq))(–56.9 J·K–1·mol–1)]} – [(1 mol BaCO3(s))(112.1 J·K–1·mol–1)] S°reaction = –159.4 J·K–1 The negative sign for entropy may be surprising. From an inspection of the reaction, one might conclude that the entropy change should be positive since it would appear that ions free to move about in the whole volume of the solution would have more distinguishable arrangements than the ions locked in their lattice positions in the solid reactant. (b) The standard free energy change for this reaction (from the standard free energy of formation values in Appendix B) is: G°reaction = {[(1 mol Ba2+(aq))(–560.8 kJ·mol–1)] + [(1 mol CO32–(aq))(–527.8 kJ·mol–1)]} – [(1 mol BaCO3(s))(–1137.6 kJ·mol–1)] G°reaction = –49.0 kJ The positive free energy change indicates that the dissolution of barium carbonate will not proceed under standard conditions. There is no driving force. It also confirms, based on thermodynamics, why we find barium carbonate to be a sparingly soluble solid. Check This 8.39. Evidence for micelle formation Our observations in Investigate This 8.37 are consistent with an explanation based on micelle formation in the detergent solution. The sugar solution (solution of individual molecules) did not scatter light, but the detergent solution did. Although we could not see the individual micelles in the detergent solution, we confirmed their presence by observing the scattering of light by this solution. Check This 8.45. Determining molar mass of a solute from freezing point lowering (a) We can use the freezing point lowering equation (8.35) together with the freezing point and the freezing point lowering constant for benzene from Table 8.2 to calculate the freezing point ACS Chemistry FROG 39 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 lowering by this solute and then the molality of the solution. The freezing point lowering for the solution is Tfp = (5.12 C) – (5.50 C) = –0.38 C Using this value and kfp = -5.12 C·m–1 for benzene, we can get the molality of the solution: Tfp 0.38 C m= = = 0.074 m kfp 5.12 C m –1 (b) We express the solute molality as moles of solute, n, per kilogram of solvent, solve for moles of solute, and use this result and the mass of solute dissolved to get its molar mass. n m = 0.074 mol·kg–1 = –3 7.567 10 kg n = (0.074 mol·kg–1)(7.567 10–3 kg) = 5.6 10–4 mol 0.243 g molar mass = = 4.3 102 g·mol–1 –4 5.6 10 mol Check This 8.47. Freezing point lowering by a polar solute in a nonpolar solvent (a) The freezing point lowering of the solution of ethanoic (acetic) acid in benzene is: Tfp = Tfp(solution) – Tfp(benzene) = (3.96 C) – (5.50 C) = –1.54 C Rearrange the freezing point lowering equation (8.35) to find the molality based on this freezing point lowering: Tfp 1.54 C m= = = 0.301 m kfp 5.12 C m –1 (b) The result in part (a) is less than the molality of the solution whose freezing point was measured. This result suggests that there are fewer particles in the solution than would be present in a 0.50 m solution. Hydrogen bonding between the ethanoic acid molecules could reduce the number of individual ethanoic acid molecules in solution. The hydrogen-bonded structure between two carboxylic acid molecules shown in Problem 8.54 for methanoic (formic) acid is likely as well for ethanoic acid in this solution. If all the molecules formed these dimers, the freezing point lowering would be that for a 0.25 m solution. Since more particles are actually present, there is probably an equilibrium reaction between monomers and dimers, as shown in Problem 8.54. Check This 8.49. Boiling point of a solution We can use the boiling point elevation equation (8.37) and the data in Table 8.3 to find the boiling point elevation and hence the boiling point of the solution. Tbp = kbpm = (2.53 C·m–1)(0.25 m) = 0.63 C Tbp(solution) = Tbp(benzene) + Tbp = (80.0 C) + (0.63 C) = 80.6 C Check This 8.51. Osmotic pressure of an ionic solution Use equation (8.38) for osmotic pressure with c = 1.0 M to account for the dissociation of NaCl: = (1.0 M)(0.08205 atm·L·mol-1·K-1)(293 K) = 24 atm 40 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Solutions for Chapter 8 End-of-Chapter Problems Problem 8.1. (a) Ice cream melting will decrease the organization of the system. Rather than being in identifiable scoops of ice cream perched securely on a cone, there now will be liquid ice cream dripping on the outside of the cone, onto your hands, and possibly onto your clothes as well. (b) Students entering a classroom with fixed seating are about to undergo an increase in organization. The chairs are permanently arranged so that a specified order will be maintained. (c) A shrub forming spring flowers will be increasing the organization of the system as these new structures are formed. Complex molecules are being arranged into even more complex cells, which in turn are organized into new units of the shrub. (d) Obtaining pure water from seawater requires an increase in the organization of the system. Starting with the salt solution, water molecules are separated from the solution, leaving behind a more concentrated brine solution (or even the previously dissolved salts as crystalline solids). (e) Shuffling a new deck of cards decreases the organization of the deck as the ordered sequence of suits and values is mixed up. (f) Raking leaves into a single pile definitely represents an increase in organization, at least until the next puff of wind comes along. Problem 8.2. A water-soluble dye spreads out when it is mixed with water because the mixed state is more probable (see Section 8.3 for why it is more probable). We know from everyday life that the reverse process never happens, (because the unmixed final state would be less probable). Problem 8.3. (a) It is unlikely that liquid food coloring added to cookie dough will spontaneously disperse through the semisolid cookie dough in a finite amount of time, because the molecules within the dough are not free to translate from one part to another. If you do enough mixing and stirring, it will be possible to turn the entire sample of dough the desired green color, but this external input of mechanical mixing is necessary. (b) Drops of green food coloring are more easily mixed with a liquid than with cookie dough. The mixing starts as the drops are added to the liquid, and molecular motion in the liquid will enable the process to continue because all the molecules in the system are in constant translational motion without any external influence (although stirring will disperse the dye molecules more quickly). Problem 8.4. If an intravenous infusion having a higher concentration than the solution within the red blood cells was given, water from the blood cell would move out of the blood cell causing crenation (shriveling) of the cells. Problem 8.5. (a) Swimming in a freshwater lake makes your body water-logged and increases your need to urinate, because osmosis occurs to transfer water through your semipermeable cell membranes to your more concentrated body solutions from the fresh water. ACS Chemistry FROG 41 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (b) Cucumbers wrinkle, lose water and shrink when placed in brine (concentrated salt water solution), because water from the less concentrated liquid inside the cucumber is transferred by osmosis through the semipermeable cell membranes into the higher concentration brine solution. (c) Prunes and raisins swell in water, because water is transferred by osmosis through the semipermeable cell membranes of the prune or raisin skin into the more concentrated solution within the dried fruit. (d) You get thirsty and your skin wrinkles when you swim in the ocean, because the salty ocean water is more concentrated than your body fluids and water is transferred by osmosis through the semipermeable cell membranes in your skin into the ocean. The loss of water from the cells near the surface of the skin causes them to change shape and size, resulting in the wrinkles that disappear when their normal complement of water is restored. Your body reacts to the need to replace the lost water by causing you to be thirsty. (e) Salt and sugar are used to preserve many foods, because the bacteria, which cause the food to spoil, die when water is transferred out of the liquid in the cells by osmosis through their semipermeable cell membranes. (f) Many saltwater fish die when placed in fresh water and vice versa, because osmosis through the semipermeable membranes of their skin causes the solute concentrations in the fish’s body tissue to decrease (saltwater fish in fresh water) or decrease (freshwater fish in salt water). Problem 8.6. When a dye solution mixes with water in an unstirred container, the mixing occurs because: (i) the mixed state has a higher number of distinguishable arrangements than the unmixed state. This is true, given our model that says the more arrangements, the higher the probability that the state will be observed. (ii) the mixed state has a lower heat content than the unmixed state. This is false, because mixing like this takes place without any transfer of energy in or out of the system. (iii) the mixed state is more probable than the unmixed state. This is true, given our model that says the more arrangements, the higher the probability that the state will be observed. Problem 8.7. (a) The probability that a broken eggshell will reform into an unbroken eggshell is 0. A broken eggshell has never been observed reforming itself into an unbroken egg. It might be possible to painstakingly glue all of the pieces back into a whole shape, but this would require considerable work (and skill) on your part and would not actually recreate the original shell (which had no glue). (b) The probability that a drop of food coloring will disperse throughout a cup of water at room temperature is 1. A drop of food coloring, given enough time, can disperse throughout a cup of water at room temperature. The molecules of water and of dye are constantly in motion, helping to achieve the complete mixture. (c) The probability of drawing the ace of spades from a shuffled deck of cards is 1/52 or 0.019. There is only one ace of spades in a deck of 52 cards. (d) The probability of finding all of the pepperoni slices on one half of a pizza surface should be close to 0. Unless a pizza has been ordered to be only half pepperoni, the consumer expects that a pepperoni pizza will have the slices even distributed over the entire pizza. There is the 42 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization possibility of human error in placing the pepperoni, but such an initial error would likely be detected by the worker or the supervisor in charge. (e) The probability of a large oak tree falling to the ground and then returning to the upright position is 0. The large oak tree fell to the ground because of disease, severe weather, or intentional cutting. A large, heavy tree, responding to gravitational force, has never been observed to spontaneously right itself. It is true that smaller trees, responding to circular winds associated with hurricanes or typhoons, may bend first one way and then back the other way. The probability of such trees successfully righting themselves and remaining healthy is low. (f) The probability of recovering six pairs of clean socks from the dryer after washing six pairs of dirty socks should equal 1, given that the person doing the washing is careful and looks for all the socks that may be hidden in other clothes or those that are dropped somewhere in the process. However, in the experience of this author, the probability hovers mysteriously around 0. Problem 8.8. Examples from daily life that illustrate the statement, “If a system can exist in more than one observable state, any changes will be in direction toward the state that is most probable,” might include, water at room temperature which exists in a liquid state rather than solid (ice) or gaseous (steam). Therefore the steam evolved during boiling water condenses in room temperature, and a cube of ice melts taken out from freezer melts while left at room temperature. (a) The most probable state for water at –5 C will be ice, because this temperature is below the freezing point of water. (b) The most probable state for water at 130 C will be steam (gas), because this temperature is above the boiling point of water. (c) The most probable state for sugar crystals in a glass of hot water will be dissolved in the water, because sugar is a soluble compound and, given enough time, will dissolve completely in water (as long as the saturated concentration is not attained). (d) The most probable state for a drop of perfume in a room will be to evaporate and spread through the room. Perfume is made to be volatile (so it will enter the gas phase and make it to the olfactory sensors in our nose), so it will evaporate and then the perfume molecules will mix with the air (like dye molecules mixing into water, except faster, because the gas molecules are further apart and travel further between collisions than molecules in a liquid). (e) The most probable state for iron filings in a magnetic field is to line up along the magnetic field lines as illustrated in Chapter 4, Section 4.3, Figure 4.11. Problem 8.9. (a) There are ten possible arrangements for two identical objects in five labeled boxes (one object per box), as shown in this table. ACS Chemistry FROG 43 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Arrangement Box 1 1 X 2 X 3 X 4 X 5 6 7 8 9 10 Box 2 X Box 3 Box 4 Box 5 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X (b) This is the same number of arrangements that we found in Investigate This 8.4 for placing three identical objects in five boxes. To see why this is so, compare the arrangements you tabulated in Investigate This 8.4 with this set of arrangements. For every arrangement in which there are three objects, there is a corresponding arrangement here in which the occupied and unoccupied boxes have swapped identities. Three occupied boxes and two unoccupied boxes have the same number of arrangements as two occupied boxes and three unoccupied boxes. The reason is that “emptiness” can be arranged just like identical objects, so it does not matter whether we focus on arranging objects in boxes or “emptiness” in boxes. The result is the same in terms of number of arrangements. (See Problem 8.95 for another system like this.) Problem 8.10. (a) There are 15 different arrangements for two dye molecules mixing into six cells (as in Figure 8.5). These are the possibilities (space is conserved by picturing the layers side by side). Arrangement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 44 Cell 1 X X Cell 2 X X Cell 3 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ACS Chemistry FROG X X Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization (b) Two dye molecule mixing into the top two layers of three cells produce 15 different arrangements (three with both molecules in the top layer, three with both molecules in the next layer, and nine with one molecule in each layer). In Figure 8.5, three dye molecules were mixed into the top two layers, producing 20 different relationships. There are more possible arrangements when there are more molecules. (Note that this result is different from the relationship of Problem 8.9 to Investigate This 8.4. Here, the two dye molecules do not occupy all of the spaces unoccupied by dye molecules in Figure 8.5.) (c) These results suggest that the more particles that mix into a given volume, the greater the number of arrangements. This is true to a point. In these countable systems, when the number of solute molecules exceeds the number of solvent molecules, the number of arrangements begins to decrease. When this happens, you can think of the solute and solvent molecules exchanging roles, since the “solvent” is usually taken as the species in excess. In real systems, such as aqueous solutions, this role reversal can usually only occur for solutes that are miscible with the water, solutions of methanol or ethanol, for example. Problem 8.11. In Figure 8.6, as the number of boxes per molecule increases from 2 to 20, the number of possible arrangements for three solute molecules in the cells increases far more than ten fold. Figure 8.6 shows that for 20 boxes per molecule, the value of W is a little more than 34,000. For two boxes per molecule (the case shown in Figure 8.5), the value of W is 20. The approximate ratio (factor of increase) is 1,700. Problem 8.12. (a) The number of distinguishable arrangements, W, of n identical objects among N labeled boxes for N = 6 and n = 3, is: N! 6! 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 6 5 4 W= = = = = = 5·4 = 20 (N n)!n! (6 3)!3! (3 2 1)(3 2 1) (3 2 1) (3 2 1) This result is the same as the number of arrangements shown in Figure 8.5. (b) These are the numbers of distinguishable arrangements for the mixtures represented in Figure 8.6. In cases where N becomes quite a bit larger than n, the first step in calculating the ratio of factorials is to cancel (N – n)! from the numerator and denominator. Then cancel n! in the denominator with appropriate terms in the numerator before doing the multiplications. These results are the same as those given in Figure 8.6. 3! 1 1 N = 3, n = 3: W = = = = 1 (because 0! 1) (3 3)!3! 0! 1 N = 6, n = 3: W = 20 [See part (a).] 9! 9 8 7 6! 9 8 7 N = 9, n = 3: W = = = = 3·4·7 = 84 6!3! 3 2 1 (9 3)!3! 12! 12 1110 N = 12, n = 3: W= = = 2·11·10 = 220 3 2 1 (12 3)!3! 15! 15 14 13 N = 15, n = 3: W= = = 5·7·13 = 455 3 2 1 (15 3)!3! ACS Chemistry FROG 45 Entropy and Molecular Organization N = 30, n = 3: N = 45, n = 3: N = 60, n = 3: Chapter 8 30! 30 29 28 = = 5·29·28 = 4,060 3 2 1 (30 3)!3! 45! 45 44 43 W= = = 15·22·43 = 14,190 3 2 1 (45 3)!3! 60! 60 59 58 W= = = 10·59·58 = 34,220 3 2 1 (60 3)!3! W= (c) For a mixture of 5 objects in 20 boxes and a mixture of 10 objects in 20 boxes, we find hat the numbers of distinguishable arrangements are: 20! 20 1918 17 16 N = 20, n = 5: W = = = 1·19·3·17·16 = 15,504 5 4 3 2 1 (20 5)!5! 20! 20! N = 20, n = 10: W = = = 184,756 (used calculator) (20 10)!10! 10!10! The conclusion in Problem 8.10(c) is reinforced by these results: the more solute molecules in a given volume, the greater the number of arrangements. The same restriction applies here. To see the affect on W when n > N/2, calculate W for N = 20 and n = 9 and 11. Is the result at all surprising? Why? Can you explain why you get this result? What other choices of n would give similar results? (See Problem 8.95 for another system like this.) Problem 8.13. In order to increase the concentration of sucrose in a plant cell (normally 0.5%) surrounded by a semipermeable membrane through which water can pass but sucrose cannot, place the cell in a solution with concentration of sucrose greater than 0.5% [process (ii)]. Some of the water inside the cell will move by osmosis through the semipermeable membrane into the solution that is more concentrated in sucrose. Since water leaves the cell, the concentration of the sucrose in the cell would increase. Placing the cell in pure water [process (i)] will result in water from the outside passing into the cell by osmosis, thus diluting the concentration of sucrose in the cell. Placing the cell in a sucrose solution with a concentration less than 0.5% [process (iii)] will result in water from this lower concentration solution to pass into the cell by osmosis, thus diluting the sugar concentration. In processes (ii) and (iii), osmosis will continue until the concentration of sucrose inside and outside the cell is the same (as long as the cell and its membrane stay intact). For case (i), water will continue to enter the cell until it either ruptures or the pressure inside rises enough to prevent further osmotic flow (see Section 8.13). Plant cells have a strong wall surrounding their membrane and are quite resistant to rupture. Problem 8.14. (a) Starting with the initial arrangement of solute and solvent molecules shown in Figure 8.7(a), the number of molecular arrangements will increase after osmosis takes place. The maximum number of molecular arrangements results from spreading the solute through the largest volume of solution possible, and the volume of solution is increasing because of movement of solvent molecules into the solution (osmosis). (b) This diagram shows what will happen if six of the nine solvent molecules in Figure 8.7(a) pass from the solvent into the solution. The solid dots indicate solute molecules. 46 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization initial [Figure 8.7(a)] final The number of possible distinguishable arrangements, Wsoln, of the three solute molecules, n = 3, in twelve cells (boxes), N = 15, is: N! 15! 15 14 13 Wsoln = = = = 5·7·13 = 455 3 2 1 (N n)!n! (15 3)!3! The number of possible distinguishable arrangements for the (three) solvent molecules on the left in the final state is unity: Wsolv = 1. Therefore, the number of possible distinguishable arrangements for the system in its final state is, Wsyst = Wsoln·Wsolv = 455·1 = 455. This value can be compared to 84 for the initial system [from Figure 8.7(a)] and 220 [from Figure 8.7(b)] when three of the water molecules have moved through the semipermeable membrane. Continuation of the osmotic flow of solvent is favored. (c) The process that is taking place in this system is osmosis, not reverse osmosis. In (forward) osmosis, solvent molecules move through a semipermeable membrane from a less concentrated solution (or pure solvent) to a more concentrated solution, which dilutes the more concentrated solution. The net effect is to increase the number of molecular arrangements for the system, which provides the direction for the change. (Reverse osmosis is introduced in Problems 8.84, 8.85, and 8.86.) Problem 8.15. When red blood cells, with a concentration of solute particles of about 2%, are placed in a 3% sucrose solution [solution (iii)], water will move out of the red blood cells by osmosis, causing the cells to shrivel (crenate). If the red blood cells are placed in either distilled water [solution (iv)] or 1% sucrose solution [solution (i)], the concentration of solute outside the cells is lower than inside, so water will pass into the cells by osmosis and the cells will swell. If the red blood cells are placed in a 2% sucrose solution [solution (ii)], there will be no net movement of water into or out of the cells, because the concentration of particles is the same on both sides of the membrane. Water will still pass through the membrane, but the same amount will pass into the cell as passes out. Problem 8.16. (a) If energy is transferred from a warmer object in contact with an identical, but cooler, object, the number of energy arrangements after the transfer is larger than the number before the transfer. Initially, the number of possible arrangements of energy quanta in the warmer object is greater than the number in the cooler object. As thermal energy is transferred, the number of arrangements in the warmer object will decrease and the number of arrangements in the cooler object will increase. At any point in this process, the product of the number of energy arrangements in the warm and cool object will be larger than any previous to this point. When transfer has occurred until the two identical objects have the same number of energy quanta, the ACS Chemistry FROG 47 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 product of the number of energy arrangements in each (which will be identical at this point) will reach a maximum. Any net transfer in either direction will result in a lower number of energy arrangements for the system. At this point, the two objects will have the same temperature. (b) The two objects are specified as being identical so their masses must be the same and they must be made of the same material. When net energy transfer stops, the final temperature will be halfway between the initial warmer and the cooler temperatures (or, looked at another way, the final temperature will be the average of the initial temperatures). Problem 8.17. (a) The observable property that differs between two identical four-atom solids, one having four quanta of energy and the other having ten, is the temperature. The four-atom solid with ten energy quanta has a higher temperature than the four-atom solid with four energy quanta. (b) To determine whether transfer of three quanta of energy from the solid with ten quanta to the solid with four quanta of energy is likely, we need to compare the total number of distinguishable arrangements of the energy in the initial and final states. We can use the data in Figure 8.9 to find the number of energy arrangements, W, in each of the solids under each condition. Values taken from the graph [calculated with the equation in Problem 8.19.] are: number of quanta 4 7 10 W 35 120 286 The total number of arrangements in a system is the product of the number of arrangements possible in each independent component of the system. For the initial state: Wtot = W10 quanta W4 quanta = 286 35 = 10,010 For the final state, after the transfer of two quanta: Wtot = W7 quanta W7 quanta = 120 120 = 14,400 There are about 1.4 times as many ways to arrange the energy quanta when both solids have seven quanta compared to when one solid has four and the other has ten. The larger the number of possible arrangements, the more likely it is that a given condition will exist, so the proposed energy transfer is favored. (c) In this example, the number of ways to arrange the energy quanta when the transfer has occurred is about 1.4 times as many as the original number of possible arrangements. In Worked Example 8.8, in which two quanta were transferred from a four-atom solid initially having eight quanta to one with four quanta, the final state has about 1.2 times as many possible arrangement as the initial state. In both cases, the number of possible arrangements increases when energy is transferred from a warmer to a cooler object and both transfers are likely to occur, as we know from experience. Problem 8.18. Thermal energy moves from a hot body to a cold body, because the number of distinguishable arrangements for the energy quanta is higher in the final state [statement (iii)]. Energy is conserved in this transfer (and no work is done), so the amount of thermal energy is constant. Thus, statements (i) and (ii) are incorrect. If the number of arrangements were higher in the 48 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization initial state, as statement (iv) says, then no transfer of energy would occur, since spontaneous changes occur in a direction that increases the number of distinguishable arrangements. Problem 8.19. (a) The number of distinguishable arrangements, W, of n identical quanta among N atoms for N = 4 and n = 2, is: (N n 1)! (4 2 1)! 5! 5 4 W= = = = = 10 3!2! 2 1 (N 1)!n! (4 1)!2! This is the same number of arrangements you found in Investigate This 8.7. Since the toothpicks-in-candies system models the quanta-in-atoms system, we expect the results to be the same. (b) These are the numbers of distinguishable arrangements for different numbers of identical quanta in a four atom solid. In cases where n becomes quite a bit larger than N, the first step in calculating the ratio of factorials is to cancel n! from the numerator and denominator. Then cancel (N – 1)! in the denominator with appropriate terms in the numerator before doing the multiplications. These results are the same as those given in Figure 8.9. (4 0 1)! N = 4, n = 0: W = = 1 (because 0! 1) (4 1)!0! (4 1 1)! 4! N = 4, n = 1: W = = =4 3!1! (4 1)!1! N = 4, n = 2: W = 10 (See part (a).) (4 3 1)! 6! 654 = = = 20 3!3! (4 1)!3! 3 2 1 (4 4 1)! 7! 765 N = 4, n = 4: W = = = = 35 3!4! (4 1)!4! 3 2 1 (4 5 1)! 8! 876 N = 4, n = 5: W = = = = 56 3!5! (4 1)!5! 3 2 1 (4 6 1)! 9! 987 N = 4, n = 6: W = = = = 3·4·7= 84 3!6! (4 1)!6! 3 2 1 (4 7 1)! 10! 10 9 8 N = 4, n = 7: W = = = = 10·3·4 = 120 3!7! 3 2 1 (4 1)!7! (4 8 1)! 11! 1110 9 N = 4, n = 8: W = = = = 11·5·3 = 165 3!8! 3 2 1 (4 1)!8! (4 9 1)! 12! 12 1110 N = 4, n = 9: W = = = = 2·11·10 = 220 3!9! 3 2 1 (4 1)!9! (4 10 1)! 13! 13 12 11 N = 4, n = 10: W= = = = 13·2·11 = 286 3!10! 3 2 1 (4 1)!10! N = 4, n = 3: W = (c) The initial state of the system described in this part is two 8-atom solids with 10 and 16 quanta, respectively. The number of distinguishable arrangements of energy in each solid is: ACS Chemistry FROG 49 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (8 10 1)! 17 16 1514 131211 = = 17·4·1·2·13·1·11 = 19,448 7 6 5 4 3 21 (8 1)!10! (8 16 1)! 23 22 2120 19 18 17 W16 = = = 23·11·1·1·19·3·17 = 245,157 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (8 1)!16! [It is easier for these calculations to use the factorial function on your calculator, if you have this function available.] The overall number of distinguishable arrangements of energy is: Wtotal = W10·W16 = 4.77 109. After the proposed energy transfer, the two solids have 14 and 12 quanta, respectively. The number of distinguishable arrangements of energy in each solid is: (8 14 1)! 21 20 19 181716 15 W14 = = = 1·1·19·3·17·8·15 = 116,280 7 6 5 4 3 21 (8 1)!14! (8 12 1)! 19 181716 15 1413 W12 = = = 19·1·17·2·3·2·13 = 50,388 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 (8 1)!12! The overall number of distinguishable arrangements is: Wtotal = W14·W12 = 5.86 109 The total number of arrangements has increased in this change, but the energy transfer ends up with the solids at different temperatures and the originally cooler one is now warmer. We know from experience that this is not a likely process, so why has the total number of arrangements increased? We need to consider the process of energy transfers in more detail. Note that the number of arrangements just calculated would be the number for the system, if two quanta of energy had been transferred from the warmer (16 quanta) solid to the cooler (10 quanta) solid. This would be a transfer from a warmer to a cooler solid with the final temperatures still not equal, but the warmer body would still be the warmer. This process would be likely, since the final number of energy arrangements is larger than the initially, and it is in accord with our experience that warm solids transfer thermal energy to cooler solids. What we need to find is the number of arrangements available when just enough quanta (three) have been transferred to bring both solids to the same temperature (that is, with the same number of quanta, 13). In this case, the number of distinguishable arrangements of each solid is: (8 13 1)! 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 W13 = = = 1·19·3·17·16·5·1 = 77,520 (8 1)!13! 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 The overall number of distinguishable arrangements is: Wtotal = W13·W13 = 6.01 109 As you see, this 13:13 system of two identical solids with the 26 quanta divided equally between them has more possible energy arrangements than either the 16:10 or 14:12 cases previously calculated. This equal distribution is the most probable for this system. If we imagine transferring one quantum from one of these solids to the other, we will end up with a 14:12 system with a lower number of energy arrangements, so the process will not be favored and explains why the originally proposed four-quantum transfer will not occur (the transfer will not “overshoot” the system with the solids at the same temperature). W10 = 50 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Problem 8.20. The second law of thermodynamics states that the total entropy of an isolated system increases in any spontaneous change. Or Observed changes take place in a direction that increases the net entropy of the universe (system and its surroundings). The mathematical statement of the law is: Snet = kln Wfinal Winitial > 0 for spontaneous processes Where Snet is the net entropy change for the system and surroundings, W is the number of distinguishable states for the system and surroundings, and k is a positive constant, the Boltzmann constant. Problem 8.21. The way we have defined it, positional entropy is a measure of the number of different distinguishable arrangements of the particles in a system. Thermal entropy is a measure of the number of different distinguishable arrangements of energy quanta among the particles in a system. [In fact, positional entropy is also a measure of energy arrangements and, for a gas, counts the number of ways the particles in the system can be distributed among the translational energy levels available to them. The qualitative results we get from particle arrangements in space mirror those we get from the correct treatment and are easier to visualize. See Problem 8.96.] Problem 8.22. If a change takes place that involves only thermal energy transfers (with no change in positional arrangements), then the net entropy change for the process will be just the thermal entropy change and it is true that the process will take place in a direction that increases thermal (net) entropy. (An example is the transfer of energy between a warm solid and a cool solid.) The same argument is true for positional entropy and processes that involve only changes in positional arrangements with no thermal energy transfers. (An example is the mixing of a soluble dye with water.) In the general case, both positional and thermal entropy changes must be accounted for in determining the net entropy change for a process and hence the direction that will be observed. Problem 8.23. We can determine absolute entropies for compounds and elements because there is a reference point for entropies – absolute zero. This is the temperature at which all substances are solids. In perfect crystals, there is no disorder and all particles are in their lowest energy state. Therefore, the number of distinguishable arrangements is one, that is, W = 1, and the entropy at this temperature is zero, S = klnW. Entropies at other temperatures can be calculated relative to S at 0 K. There is no such reference point for enthalpy and so we can only calculate changes in enthalpy, H, from one state to another. Problem 8.24. (a) The entropy of a mole of solid mercury is higher than a mole of mercury vapor. This statement is false. Gas phases have higher positional entropy because the volume available to each particle (atom of mercury, in this case) is so much higher than in the condensed phases. One way to correct the statement is to say: The entropy of a mole of solid mercury is lower than a mole of mercury vapor. ACS Chemistry FROG 51 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (b) If the net entropy increases during a process, the process is spontaneous. This statement is true. Spontaneous changes take place in the direction that increases net entropy. (c) The entropy of a system depends on the pathway it took to its present state. This statement is false. Entropy is a state function that is independent of pathway, so the correct statement might be: The entropy of a system does not depend on the pathway it took to its present state. (d) The more positive its net entropy change, the faster the process. This statement is false. Positive change of net entropy indicates that a change is favorable, but it does not indicate the rate of the process. A correct statement could be: The net entropy change for a process, is not related to the speed of the process. (e) The entropy of one liter of a 0.1 M aqueous solution of NaCl is lower than the entropy of the undissolved 0.1 mole of NaCl and one liter of water. This statement is false. The entropy of the mixture is greater than the entropy for the separated components because more molecular arrangements exist for the system with the soluble compound dissolved in the solvent. (f) The entropy is larger for a system of two identical blocks of copper in which the temperature of each block is 60 C than for the same blocks of copper if one has a temperature of 20 C and the other is at 120 C. This statement is true. There are more energy arrangement and greater entropy for systems in which two identical objects have the same temperature than when one object is warmer than the other. See Problem 8.19(c). (g) There is no reference point for measuring entropy. This statement is false. The reference point for measuring entropy is the state of the substances at absolute zero, 0 K, at which temperature the entropy of a perfectly ordered substance is zero. (Absolute zero has never been experimentally achieved, but experiments have come within a billionth of a degree of 0 K.) A correct statement could be: The reference point for measuring the entropy of a substance is its state at 0 K, where its entropy is zero, for a perfectly ordered crystal. Problem 8.25. (a) The positional entropy change for precipitation of BaSO4 upon mixing Ba(NO3)2(aq) and H2SO4(aq), will be positive, because the Ba2+(aq) and SO42–(aq) have lower positional entropy than the same ions in the crystal lattice. The reason the aquated ions have low positional entropy is because many water molecules are oriented around these highly charged ions, making the entropy of the solution low due to the loss of positional entropy of the water molecules. (b) The positional entropy change for cooling of ammonia gas from room temperature to – 50 C, which results in NH3(g) NH3(l), will be negative because ammonia gas has higher positional entropy than ammonia in the condensed phase. (c) The positional entropy change for formation of ammonia in the reaction, N2(g) + 3H2(g) 2NH3(g), will be negative because there are fewer moles of gas in the product than in the reactants. This means that some positional entropy is lost in this process, because fewer moles of gas have lower entropy. (d) The positional entropy change for decomposition of CaCO3 in the reaction, CaCO3(s) CaO(s) + CO2(g), will be positive because a solid is converted into a solid and gas. Some positional entropy is gained in this process, because gases have higher positional entropy than solids. 52 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization (e) The change in positional entropy for formation of NO in the reaction, N2(g) + O2(g) 2NO(g), is hard to predict in this case, because of the same number of moles of gas is involved in the reactants and in product. Problem 8.26. [This problem would be better placed in Section 8.14 where molecular organization is discussed in terms of the source of the net entropy that “drives” organization on Earth.] The second law of thermodynamics states that the net entropy change (accounting for the system and surroundings) for a spontaneous process is positive. If a change in a system, such as evolving more complex organisms from simpler ones, reduces the number of possible distinguishable arrangements of the components, then the change in the system can only be spontaneous if it is accompanied by an increase in the number of arrangements of its surroundings. In the case of evolution (or even the formation of the first most primitive cell), energy is required to bring the components together in just the right way (to form the correct bonding arrangements, for example). In almost all cases, this energy is supplied by electromagnetic radiation from the sun that is captured in various ways on earth and used to bring about the evolutionary changes. The nuclear processes in the sun transfer a prodigious amount of energy to its surroundings, so there are enormous increases in their entropy. Thus, the entropy increase of the sun and its surroundings are much more than enough to “drive” the relatively small evolutionary changes that reduce the entropy of the evolving system. Problem 8.27. Directly applying the principles of thermodynamics to workspace objects is not a good idea. In thermodynamics, we assume that the energy of the system is sufficient that all possible arrangements can be reached from one another. For example, gas molecules are in constant motion, so the system can easily move from one arrangement to another. On the other hand, if books are arranged on a shelf, we know that (barring some kind of high energy intervention such as an earthquake) they are going to stay arranged on the shelf. They lack the kinetic energy (motion) to make a transition to other arrangements. So, thermodynamics is not responsible for clutter in a friend's workspace. Problem 8.28. H3C H2 C O C H2 C OH H2C CH2 O O H2C CH2 (a) In the isomeric pair butanoic acid, , and dioxane, , the butanoic acid has the higher entropy under the same pressure and temperature conditions. There are more positional arrangements for butanoic acid due to bond rotations than the constrained ring of dioxane. “Floppy” molecules will almost always have higher entropies than isomers that are less floppy, because of rings or other more compact structures. This is because there are more low energy motions, mainly rotations of one part of the molecule relative to the rest, for the floppier molecule and thus more distinguishable ways to distribute the same amount of energy. H3C H2 C C H2 C CH3 CH3 H3C C CH3 H3C , H2 (b) In the isomeric pair pentane, , and 2,2-dimethylpropane, the pentane has the higher entropy under the same pressure and temperature conditions. Again, as in part (a), there are more positional arrangements for pentane due to bond rotations. Pentane is a ACS Chemistry FROG 53 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 floppier molecule than the more compact 2,2-dimethylpropane, as you can see if you build models of the two molecules. H 2C CH 2 C H2 H 2C CH 2 C H2 (c) In the isomeric pair cyclopropane, , and propene, , the propene has the higher entropy under the same pressure and temperature conditions. Again, as in parts (a) and (b), there are more positional arrangements for propene due to bond rotations. Propene is a floppier molecule than the more rigid cyclopropane. Problem 8.29. The statement, “observed phase changes always take place in a direction that increases entropy,” is incomplete and can be misleading. It is the net entropy that points the direction of observed changes, including phase changes. Without this qualifier, there is sometimes confusion when only thermal or only positional entropy is considered. For example, this chapter started with the observation that complex, highly-ordered snowflakes can form from water vapor or liquid droplets. This apparently spontaneous ordering does not increase the positional entropy for the water molecules involved in the change. As the snowflakes form, there is a decrease in positional entropy of the system, which does not favor the phase change. However, there is an increase in thermal energy of the surroundings that does favor the phase change. A positive value for net entropy change, which must consider both system and surroundings, does indicate the correct direction for observed phase changes. Problem 8.30. (a) In the pair H2O(s) and H2O(l), the H2O(l) has the higher entropy, because a molecule in the liquid has a larger volume to move in (the whole volume of liquid instead of a tiny localized volume around its position in the crystal). (b) In the pair CaCl2 (aq) and CaCl2(s), the CaCl2(s) has the higher entropy. This result is difficult to predict, because the entropy of dissolution of salts of multiply-charged and singlycharged ions depends sensitively on the interactions of specific ions with the solvent water. Multiply-charged ions have a greater orienting effect on the water molecules in their vicinity than do singly-charged ions. For salts of multiply-charged cations and anions, the effect is always to make the entropy of the aquated ions less than the entropy of the ions in the crystal [see Problem 8.25(a)]. For the case here, we need to look at the entropy values in Appendix B to determine which state has the higher entropy. For the solid, the entropy is 104.6 J·K–1·mol–1, and for the sum of the aquated ions (Cl– taken twice), the entropy is 59.9 J·K–1·mol–1. (Calcium chloride is quite soluble in water, because the enthalpy of solution is large and negative, so the entropy change of the thermal surroundings is positive enough to compensate for the loss of entropy upon dissolution.) (c) In the pair 5.0 g H2O(l) at 1 C and 5.0 g H2O(l) at 60 C, the 5.0 g H2O(l) at 60 C has the higher entropy, because the system has more thermal energy to distribute among the same number of molecules, so there will be more distinguishable arrangements of energy quanta in the system and, thus, higher entropy. (d) In the pair H2O(g) and H2O(l), the H2O(g) has the higher entropy, because the molecules in the gas have a larger volume to move in (the whole volume of the container instead of just the volume occupied by the liquid). 54 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization (e) In the pair CO2 (g) and CO2(s), dry ice, the CO2 (g) has the higher entropy, because a molecule in the gas has a larger volume to move in (the whole volume of the container instead of a tiny localized volume around its position in the crystal). Problem 8.31. When water freezes, the entropy change of the system is negative, Swater < 0. The thermal energy change when the water freezes (and many hydrogen bonds form) is negative, Hwater < 0, and the thermal energy change in the surroundings is positive, Hsurround = –Hwater. The entropy Hsurround change of the surroundings is Ssurround = T , where T is the kelvin temperature of the surroundings. If the thermal surroundings are at a temperature less than 273 K, Ssurround + Swater = Snet > 0 and the process is spontaneous. Thus, water freezes, if the temperature of surroundings is below 273 K. Problem 8.32. (a) When solid CO2 (dry ice) changes to carbon dioxide gas, the positional entropy increases. A molecule in the gas has a larger volume to move in (the whole volume of the container instead of a tiny localized volume around its position in the crystal) and, therefore, more distinguishable arrangements possible than in the solid. (b) When liquid ethanol (C2H5OH) freezes, the positional entropy decreases. There are fewer possible arrangements of ethanol molecules in the solid state than when in the liquid state, because a molecule in the liquid has a larger volume in which to move (the entire volume of the liquid instead of a tiny localized volume around its position in the crystal). (c) When mothballs made of naphthalene (C10H8) sublime, the positional entropy increases. There are many more possible arrangements of molecules of naphthalene in the gas phase than in the solid state, because a molecule in the gas has a larger volume to move in (the whole volume of the container instead of a tiny localized volume around its position in the crystal). (d) When plant materials burn to form carbon dioxide and water, the positional entropy increases. There are many more possible arrangements of molecules in the gases that result from combustion of the plant material, because they are free to move about in the entire volume of their container instead of being constrained to a small volume within the molecules in the plant. Problem 8.33. Consider an isolated system where a balloon containing steam, H2O(g), is immersed into a thermally isolated container of liquid water at 10.0 C. (a) In an isolated system where a balloon containing steam, H2O(g), is immersed into a thermally isolated container of liquid water at 10.0 C, the steam will condense to liquid water. (b) In this system, the entropy of the water molecules in the balloon will decrease as the water vapor cools and changes from a gas to a liquid and then the liquid decreases in temperature until it is the same temperature as the water outside the balloon. Both the positional and thermal entropy of the water will decrease as the gas condenses and cools. The positional entropy decreases because the gas changes to a liquid and thermal entropy of the water in the balloon decreases because thermal energy is transferred to the surrounding water and there are fewer quanta to distribute in the water in the balloon. ACS Chemistry FROG 55 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (c) The entropy of the water outside the balloon will increase. Thermal energy is transferred to the water outside the balloon, so its thermal entropy will increase. (d) The net entropy change for this process in the isolated system will be positive. Our experience tells us that steam in thermal contact with cool water will condense, so this must be the direction of the observable change in the system and net entropy increases in spontaneous (observable) processes. Problem 8.34. (a) This diagram, modeled after Figure 8.11, is for melting of H2S(s) at temperatures above the normal melting point, 187 K. [Note that the diagram is qualitatively identical to Figure 8.11, which was for the melting of H2O(s) at temperatures above 273 K. This is to be expected for the melting of any solid above its normal melting point.] As we see, melting increases positional entropy (blue arrow). Melting requires energy from the surroundings, so the process is endothermic and the enthalpy change for the system is positive. The surroundings lose an equivalent amount of energy and we can calculate the thermal entropy change of the surroundings as shown. Loss of thermal energy from the surroundings decreases their thermal entropy (red arrow). Since the temperature, T, is above the normal (equilibrium) melting point of the solid, the thermal entropy change is smaller in magnitude than the positional entropy change and their sum, the net entropy change (green arrow) is positive. (b) This diagram is for H2S(l) freezing to H2S(s) at 187 K, the normal melting/freezing point. Compare this diagram to the one in part (a). 56 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Freezing decreases positional entropy (blue arrow). Freezing releases energy to the surroundings, so the process is exothermic and the enthalpy change for the system is negative. The surroundings gain an equivalent amount of energy and we can calculate the thermal entropy change of the surroundings as shown. Gain of thermal energy by the surroundings increases their thermal entropy (red arrow). Since the temperature, T, is the normal (equilibrium) freezing point of the liquid, the thermal entropy change is identical in magnitude to the positional entropy change and their sum, the net entropy change is zero, so no net entropy change arrow is shown. (c) The phase change for water changing from solid to liquid takes place at 0 C (273 K), while that for H2S at –86 C (187 K). The difference can be explained by hydrogen bonding. This intermolecular force is a major factor in water, but is quite weak in H2S, where the larger size of the sulfur atom and the smaller electronegativity difference are unfavorable for hydrogen bonding. The hydrogen bonding in H2O makes the energy required to disrupt the interactions in the solid larger than that required in H2S. Since less energy is required by the H2S, enough energy is available at lower temperature and its melting point is lower. Problem 8.35. The order of increasing entropy of vaporization is methane < ammonia < water. There are a Hl g couple of ways to reason out this ordering. One is to use the relationship Slg = T , which is valid at the boiling temperature of the liquid where the net entropy change for the process is zero, because the two phases are in equilibrium. Water, with its extensive network of hydrogen bonds, has a higher enthalpy of vaporization (energy required to break the hydrogen bonds among the molecules and get them into the gas phase) than either ammonia or methane. Since the enthalpy of vaporization is highest for water, its entropy of vaporization is highest. Ammonia is also hydrogen bonded in the liquid, but, as we discussed in Chapter 1, Section 1.7, Consider This 1.26, the hydrogen bonding cannot be as extensive as in water, because each molecule has only a single nonbonding pair of electrons with which to hydrogen bond. Because ACS Chemistry FROG 57 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 it has some hydrogen bonding, the enthalpy of vaporization of ammonia will be higher than that of methane, which has no hydrogen bonding capacity and whose molecules are held together in the liquid phase only by dispersion forces, which are relatively weak for this small molecule. Thus, the entropy of vaporization for ammonia will be higher than that for methane. Problem 8.36. (a) The complete combustion of ethanol, C2H5OH(l), changes 3 moles of gas (and 1 mole of the condensed liquid phase) into 2 moles of gas (and 3 moles of condensed liquid phase): C2H5OH(l) + 3O2 (g) 2(g) + 3H2O(l) For this reaction, H = –1367 kJ and S = –139 J.K–1. The decrease in number of moles of gas means that there is a decrease in positional entropy for the reaction. You might argue that 4 moles of reactants have changed to 5 moles of products, which might be expected to increase positional entropy. However, the entropies of gas phase substances are a good deal larger than the entropy of condensed phases, so arguments based on changes in gaseous moles usually are a better predictor of the sign of the entropy change. The fact that the experimental value for the entropy change is negative indicates that the reduction in number of moles of gas is the controlling factor in the entropy change for the system. (b) The overall reaction is highly exothermic, releasing 1367 kJ. The sum of the bond enthalpies for formation of the product bonds must be substantially greater than the sum of the bond enthalpies for the bonds that must be broken in the reactants. The C=O bonds in CO2 are particularly strong (because of the delocalization of the pi bonding electrons in the molecule), which, together with the rather weak O=O bond in O2, helps to account for the large exothermicity of this and other combustion reactions. (c) Considering what we said in part (a), this reaction is not favored by positional entropy change, which is negative. There is, however, a large release of energy to the surroundings, which means a large positive thermal entropy change for the reaction, so the net entropy change is positive and quite large: o o Snet Ssystem o H system T S –1 o net –138 J K –1367 10 3 J = +4449 J·K–1 298 K The large positive value means that the combustion is highly probable. Remember that it also is an exothermic reaction. Ethanol is used in many types of automotive fuels as an octane booster now that lead has been eliminated from gasoline in the US. Problem 8.37. (a) To calculate Holg and Solg for the phase transition, Br2(l) Br2(g), we need the standard enthalpies of formation and standard entropies for Br2(l) and Br2(g) (from Appendix B): Hlg = Hf[Br2(g)] – Hf[Br2(l)] = [30.91 kJ.mol–1] – [0 kJ.mol–1] = 30.91 kJ.mol– 1 Slg = S[Br2(g)] – S[Br2(l)] = [245.46 J·K–1·mol–1] – [152.23 J·K–1·mol–1] = 93.23 J·K–1·mol–1 58 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization H o lg (b) We can use the relation, Snet = Slg – T , to find the net entropy change at different temperatures (assuming that S and H are independent of temperature): 3 –1 Snet = (93.23 J·K–1·mol–1) – (30.91 10 J mol ) 273 K –1 –1 = –19.99 J·K ·mol (i) 273 K (0 C): 3 –1 (ii) 313 K (40 C): Snet = (93.23 J·K–1·mol–1) – (30.91 10 J mol ) 313 K –1 –1 = –5.52 J·K ·mol 3 –1 (iii) 343 K (70 C): Snet = (93.23 J·K–1·mol–1) – (30.91 10 J mol ) 343 K –1 –1 = 3.11 J·K ·mol (c) The results from part (b) show that the vaporization becomes spontaneous between 40 C and 70 C. This means that at some temperature in this range, Snet = 0, and the liquid and gas H o lg are in equilibrium at one atmosphere pressure. At this temperature, Slg = Tbp , which we can solve to find T, the boiling temperature of bromine: Tbp = H o lg S 3 –1 = (30.91 10 J mol ) o lg (93.23 J K –1 mol–1 ) = 331.5 K (58.5 C) [The handbook value for the boiling point is 58.78 C, so this approach gives excellent results in this case.] Problem 8.38. For the phase change, H2O(l) H2O(g), Hlg is positive (energy must be put into the system to change liquid to gaseous water). The enthalpy change will contribute to a negative net H o lg entropy change for the vaporization, because Snet = Slg – T . However, for this change, Slg is also positive (a gas has higher entropy than its liquid), so as the temperature H o lg rises (which makes the T term smaller) the net entropy change, Snet, will ultimately become dominated by the Slg term. Problem 8.39. (a) The reasoning for this solution is identical to that for Problem 8.38. To calculate Holg and Solg for the phase transition, RCHO(l) RCHO(g), where RCHO is CH3CHO (ethanal), we need the standard enthalpies of formation and standard entropies for RCHO(l) and RCHO(g) (from Appendix B): Holg = Hof[RCHO(g)] – Hof[RCHO(l)] = –166.36 kJ.mol–1 – (–192.30 kJ.mol–1) = 25.94 kJ.mol–1 ACS Chemistry FROG 59 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 Solg = So[RCHO(g)] – So[RCHO(l)] = 264.22 J.K–1.mol–1 – 160.2 J.K–1.mol–1 = 104.0 J.K–1.mol–1 (b) At some temperature, Snet = 0, for this phase change and the liquid and gas are in H o lg equilibrium at one atmosphere pressure. At this temperature, Sl g = Tbp , which we can solve to find T, the boiling temperature of bromine: Tbp = H o lg S 3 –1 = (25.94 10 J mol ) o lg (104.0 J K –1 mol–1 ) = 249.4 K (–23.8 C) [The handbook value for the boiling point is 20.8 C, which is far from this calculated result. There is likely to be a problem with the thermodynamic values in Appendix B. An internet search for thermodynamic data relevant to this problem suggests that the enthalpy of vaporization is probably correct, so the problem probably lies with the entropies. However, the values in Appendix B are confirmed (within 1%) by thermodynamics data tables available on the Web. However, one reference in a Google search (http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:fT1JmaIGvyIJ:web.chem.ucla.edu/~luceigh/BA L/BAL_EXAMS/CHEM14B/14BF99FINANSW.pdf+%22standard+entropy%22+%2Ba cetaldehyde&hl=en), gave a value of 250.3 J.K–1.mol–1 for the standard entropy of gaseous ethanal. If this value is used in this problem, we get Solg 90 J.K–1.mol–1 and Tbp 288 K (15.2 C), which is a good deal closer to the experimental value. If Solg 88 J.K–1.mol–1, the calculated boiling point would agree with the experimental value. Students should note that not all data in tables are necessarily correct.] Problem 8.40. (a) To calculate Holg for the phase transition, CH3OH(l) CH3OH(g), we need the standard enthalpies of formation for CH3OH(l) and CH3OH(g) (from Appendix B): Hlg = Hf[CH3OH(g)] – Hf[CH3OH(l)] = (–200.66 kJ.mol–1) – (–238.86 kJ.mol– 1 ) = 38.20 kJ.mol–1 (b) Using the value for Hlg from part (a), we can use the boiling point of methanol, 65.0 C (338.2 K), to find: Slg = H o lg Tbp 3 –1 = (38.20 10 J mol ) 338.2 K = 113.0 J. K–1.mol–1 To use this relationship, we assume that the standard enthalpy and entropy changes are not temperature dependent. (c) Using the standard entropies of formation for CH3OH(l) and CH3OH(g) (from Appendix B), we find: Solg = So[CH3OH(g)] – So[CH3OH(l)] = (239.81 J. K–1.mol–1) – (126.8 J. K–1.mol–1) = 113.0 J. K–1.mol–1 60 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization There is good agreement between this value and the calculated result from part (b). Problem 8.41. (a) The value G = –1325 kJ.mol–1, for the complete combustion of ethanol, C2H5OH(l), predicts that this reaction will take place at standard pressure and 298 K, because the free energy change is < 0 for this temperature and pressure. (b) If this reaction were to come to equilibrium, the Gibbs free energy change, G = G, at standard pressure, would be zero and we can use this relationship (together with the values for H and S from Problem 8.26) to find the temperature where this would occur: 0 = G = G = H – TS 0 = (–1367 103 J) – T(–139 J·K–1); T 9800 K (c) In order to use the relationship in part (b), we assume that H and S are constant over the temperature range from 273 K to 9800 K. This is definitely not a valid assumption for such a large temperature range. Long before this high temperature is reached, the molecules in this reaction will begin to disintegrate into smaller fragments and atoms, or even ions and electrons. One lesson from this sort of result is that reactions with such large enthalpy changes are unlikely to come to equilibrium at standard pressure under any temperature conditions. Problem 8.42. To find out whether the reaction, 2H2O2(g) 2H2O(g) + O2(g), is likely to occur at 298 K (that is, whether we expect H2O2 (g) to be stable or likely to decompose at 298 K), we can combine the enthalpy and entropy values, H = –106 kJ and S = 58 J·K–1, to get G. G = H – TS = (–106 103 J) – (298 K)(58 J·K–1) = –123 103 J = –123 kJ The decomposition of H2O2 (g) has a high negative free energy change, so at this temperature H2O2(g) is not stable, the decomposition is spontaneous (although not rapid—see Chapter 11). Problem 8.43. (a) The free energy change for a reaction that is nonspontaneous at 300 K must be positive at this temperature, G > 0. If the reaction has a positive entropy change of 130 J·K–1, the contribution of the –TS term to G is negative. Therefore, the enthalpy change for the reaction must be positive, H > 0, in order for G > 0. This reaction is endothermic since H is positive. (b) The minimum value of H that will make this reaction nonspontaneous is the value that will make G = 0: G = 0 = H – TS = H – (300 K)(130 J·K–1) H = 39.0 kJ For H 39.0 kJ, G 0. Problem 8.44. Because there are no absolute reference states for enthalpies and free energies, we define the reference state as the elements in their most stable form at the standard state and 298 K. Thus, the standard enthalpies and free energies of formation, H0f and Gof , are defined as zero to provide a reference for other standard enthalpies and free energies of formation. There is an absolute reference state for entropies, the entropy of the substance at absolute zero, 0 K, which, ACS Chemistry FROG 61 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 for a perfectly ordered crystal is S0 = 0. The subscript “0” on the symbol indicates the value at 0 K. The entropies of all substances are referred to this absolute value. Problem 8.45. The answers to this problem are based on the relationship G = H – TS, the criterion for spontaneity, G < 0, and their relationships summarized in this graphic. (a) Processes that fall in quadrant A are always spontaneous. A negative H and positive S always combine to give G < 0. (b) Processes that fall in quadrant D are never spontaneous. A positive H and negative S always combine to give G > 0. (c) Processes that fall in quadrants B and C could possibly be spontaneous, depending upon the temperature at which the processes are carried out. In quadrant B, the positive H always disfavors spontaneity. However, the –TS factor (with positive S) is always negative and, at sufficiently high temperature could outweigh H, that is, |–TS | > |H | and G < 0. Conversely, in quadrant C, the negative H always favors spontaneity, but the –TS factor (with negative S) is always positive. At sufficiently low temperature the enthalpy effect could outweigh the entropy effect, that is, |H | > |–TS | and G < 0. (d) Quadrant C represents the freezing of a liquid. In this process, both S and H are negative and, as we showed in part (c), at sufficiently low temperature the enthalpy effect could outweigh the entropy effect, that is, |H | > |–TS |, G < 0, and the liquid freezes. (e) Quadrant B represents the melting of a solid. In this process, both S and H are positive and, as we showed in part (c), at sufficiently high temperature the entropy effect could outweigh the enthalpy effect, that is, |–TS | > |H |, G < 0, and the solid melts. Problem 8.46. At a certain temperature, G for the reaction CO2(g) C(s) + O2(g), is found to be 42 kJ. (i) “The system is at equilibrium” is an incorrect statement, because G = 0 for a system at equilibrium. (ii) “The process is not possible” is a correct statement (under these conditions), because G > 0 for the change means the reaction is nonspontaneous, that is, will not be observed. (iii) “CO2 will be formed spontaneously” is a correct statement, because the reverse reaction, formation of CO2, will have G = –42 kJ and reactions are spontaneous if G < 0 for the change. (iv) “CO2 will decompose spontaneously” is an incorrect statement, because reactions are only spontaneous if G < 0 for the change. Problem 8.47. (a) Considering the oxidation of methane, CH4(g) + 2O2(g) CO2(g) + 2H2O(g), we predict that the change in entropy will be close to zero because 3 molecules of gaseous reactants produce 3 molecules of gaseous products. (b) We are asked to find the standard entropy change for the reaction, using the standard enthalpies and free energies of formation, Hf and Gf, of the reactants and products. We will 62 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization first calculate H and G for the reaction and then use the G = H – TS relationship rearranged to solve for S: H = [(1 mol)Hf(C02) + (2 mol)Hf (H2O)] – (1 mol)Hf(CH4) = [–393.51 kJ + 2·(–241.82kJ)] – (–74.81kJ) = –802.34 kJ G = [(1 mol)Gf(C02) + (2 mol)Gf (H2O)] – (1 mol)Gf(CH4) = [–394.36 kJ + 2·(–228.57 kJ)] – (–50.72kJ) = –800.78 kJ H o – G o (–802.34 10 3 J) – (–800.78 10 3 J) = = –5.23 J·K–1 T 298 K (c) The calculated change in entropy is small, just as we predicted in part (a). [Using the standard entropies in Appendix B to calculate S gives –5.14 J·K–1. This value is, identical, within the uncertainties of the data, to the value calculated in part (b), which indicates that the data in Appendix B are internally consistent.] S = Problem 8.48. A large negative G indicates that the reaction, 2H2(g) + O2(g) 2H2O(l), is spontaneous, but it does not indicate anything about the speed of the reaction. Although the reaction is spontaneous, it is very slow, so we will not observe any water formed after mixing oxygen and hydrogen at room temperature. Problem 8.49. (a) For the reaction, C(graphite) + 2H2(g) CH4(g), H = 74.8 kJ and S = 80.8 J·K-1. This table and plot show H, TS, and G as a function of temperature for the reaction under standard conditions, assuming that H and S are constant and do not vary with temperature. T(K) 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 H (kJ) -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 -74.8 S (kJ·K–1) TS (kJ) –0.0808 –16.2 –0.0808 –24.2 –0.0808 –32.3 –0.0808 –40.4 –0.0808 –48.5 –0.0808 –56.6 –0.0808 –64.6 –0.0808 –72.7 –0.0808 –80.8 –0.0808 –88.9 –0.0808 –97.0 –0.0808 –105 ACS Chemistry FROG G (kJ) –58.6 –50.6 –42.5 –34.4 –26.3 –18.2 –10.2 –2.08 6.00 14.1 22.2 30.2 63 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (b) From the plot we find the intersection of the H and TS lines, that is, where G = H – TS = 0. This is at about 925 K and corresponds to T = H/S. (c) Since the data extrapolation required to estimate the equilibrium temperature is more than 600 degrees (298 K to over 900 K), the assumptions that S and H are constant, independent of T, almost certainly are not valid. The temperature estimated in part (b) is likely to be off from the experimental value. Problem 8.50. Liquid and gaseous water are in equilibrium at 100 C and one atmosphere, 101.3 kPa, pressure. Under these conditions G = 0 kJ for the phase change. At one bar, 100 kPa, pressure, the phases are not quite in equilibrium at 100 C. The slightly lower vapor pressure of water will be in equilibrium with the liquid at a temperature slightly below 100 C. If the temperature is increased (holding the pressure constant at one bar), vaporization will become spontaneous, that is, G < 0 kJ, but we have no information from the problem or background in the textbook to calculate the value for G (which will be quite close to zero) under these conditions. Problem 8.51. The challenge in this problem is to reconcile two viewpoints about the direction of change: (1) observed changes occur in the direction that increases the net entropy of the universe, Snet, the sum of positional and thermal entropy changes for the process and (2) observed changes occur in the direction that minimizes the energy of the system undergoing change and maximizes its entropy. The thermal entropy change for a process is a measure of the entropy change in the thermal surroundings, Sthermal = –H/T, where H is the enthalpy change in the system undergoing change. If H is negative (an exothermic process), then Sthermal is positive and acts to increase the net entropy of the world, Snet. The positional entropy change, Spositional, is the entropy change in the system. From the point of view of the system alone, maximizing its entropy means maximizing Spositional, which is in the direction to make Snet large and positive. Minimizing the energy of the system means losing as much energy as possible to the surroundings, an exothermic process. This exothermicity makes Sthermal positive and large, 64 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization which, again, is in the direction to make Snet large and positive. Thus, the two viewpoints come down to the same thing. The problem with the energy-entropy viewpoint is that it obscures the underlying basis for the change, the increase in net entropy, and makes it seem that entropy and energy effects are somehow in competition, which is not the case. Problem 8.52. (a) The relationship among G, H, and TS for a system is. G = H –TS For the combustion reaction, CH3COCH3(g)+ 4O2(g) 3CO2(g)) + 3H2O(l), at 298 K, we are given the values G = –1784 kJ and H = –1854 kJ. Substituting into the above equation gives: –1784 kJ = –1854 kJ – TS The difference between the G and H terms is only 70 kJ, which is the value of TS. The TS term is small relative to the values of G and H. The sign of S must be negative for the two sides of the equation to be equal in value. A negative value for S makes sense, because the reaction involves five moles of gaseous reactants giving only three moles of gaseous products. The reduction in moles of gas in the system predicts a decrease in entropy for the reaction. (b) A small value for TS means a small value for S, which we equate with the positional entropy change, Sposition for the system. Since S < 0 [from part (a)], the contribution of the positional entropy change to the net entropy change, Snet, for the reaction will be small and negative. Conversely, the thermal entropy change, Sthermal = – H T , will be a large positive contribution to Snet. Thermal energy released to the surroundings provides the driving force in this and most combustion reactions. (c) Rearranging the equation in part (a), gives us S for this reaction: H – G (–1854 10 J) – (–1784 10 J) = = –235 J·K–1 T 298 K 3 S = 3 Problem 8.53. (a) For the reaction, 4Ag(s) + O2(g) 2Ag2O(s), to be spontaneous, we need G < 0. Under constant atmospheric pressure conditions, we can use the standard enthalpy and entropy changes, H = –61.1 kJ and S = –0.132 kJ.K–1, to calculate G = G, at 25 C (298 K): G = –61.1 kJ – (298 K)(–0.132 kJ.K–1) = –21.8 kJ The reaction is spontaneous at 25 C. (b) For the reaction at 273 C (546 K), we calculate: G = –61.1 kJ – (546 K)(–0.132 kJ.K–1) = 11.0 kJ The reaction is not spontaneous at 273 C. This calculation is based on the assumption that the enthalpy and entropy changes are constant, independent of temperature. This assumption is probably not strictly valid, but the variation over about a 250 C range is likely not to be so large as to make our conclusion wrong. Somewhere in this temperature range, the reaction is probably in equilibrium at standard pressure. Problem 8.54. ACS Chemistry FROG 65 Entropy and Molecular Organization These thermodynamic data are for the species present in the gas-phase dimerization reaction of methanoic acid (dotted lines represent hydrogen bonds): 2 O H C O H O H O H C C H O H O Chapter 8 Species HC(O)OH(g) [HC(O)OH]2(g) Hof kJ·mol–1 –362.63 –785.34 So J·K–1·mol–1 251.0 347.7 (a) We can use the data in the table to calculate H, S, and G for the dimerization reaction and determine whether it is spontaneous at standard pressure and 298 K: H = (1 mol)Hf(dimer) – (2 mol)Hf(acid) = (–785.34 kJ) – 2·(–362.63 kJ) = –60.08 kJ S = (1 mol)S(dimer) – (2 mol)S(acid) = (347.7 J·K–1) – 2·(251.0 J·K–1) = –154.3 J·K–1 G = H – TS = –60.08 kJ – (298 K)(–0.1543 kJ·K–1) = –14.10 kJ The negative value of G indicates a spontaneous dimerization reaction at standard pressure and 298 K. (b) The H calculated value of –60.08 kJ is essentially the energy released when two moles of hydrogen bonds are formed during the dimerization. Therefore, the enthalpy change per mole of hydrogen bonds would be half of this value, –30.04 kJ. (c) Unlike enthalpy values, entropy values cannot be averaged, because the probable steps in the reaction have quite different entropy changes. The entropy change for two molecules of methanoic acid finding each other to form the first hydrogen bond is quite large, because two particles free to move about anywhere in the system become one particle. The solutions to Problems 8.52 and 8.54 suggest that a little more than 100 J·K–1 are lost for each mole of gas that is lost going from reactants to products. If this is the case, then more than two-thirds of the entropy change in this reaction is due to the loss of particles in the dimerization. The dimer with only one hydrogen bond between the acid monomers will be more floppy (see Problem 8.28) than the cyclic structure formed when the second hydrogen bond is made. Thus, there is a further loss of entropy in this second step of the reaction, but the change is a good deal smaller than for the first interaction. Since the value of free energy change depends on the value of entropy change, we cannot estimate the free energy change per hydrogen bond formed, in the same way we did for the enthalpy. Problem 8.55. We use data from Appendix B to calculate H, S, and G for these dissolution reactions: KCl(s) K+(aq) + Cl–(aq) H = [(1 mol)Hf(K+(aq)) + (1 mol)Hf(Cl–(aq))] – [(1 mol)Hf(KCl(s)] = [(–252.38 kJ) +(–167.16 kJ)] – [–436.75 kJ] = 17.21 kJ S = [(1 mol)S(K+(aq)) + (1 mol)S(Cl–(aq))] – [(1 mol)S(KCl(s)] = [(102.5 J·K–1) +(56.5 J·K–1)] – [82.59 J·K–1] = 76.4 J·K–1 G = [(1 mol)Gf(K+(aq)) + (1 mol)Gf(Cl–(aq))] – [(1 mol)Gf(KCl(s)] = [(–283.27 kJ) +(–131.23 kJ)] – [–409.14 kJ] = –5.36 kJ 66 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization AgCl(s) Ag+(aq) + Cl–(aq) H = [(1 mol)Hf(Ag+(aq)) + (1 mol)Hf(Cl–(aq))] – [(1 mol)Hf(AgCl(s)] = [(105.58 kJ) +(–167.16 kJ)] – [–127.07 kJ] = 65.49 kJ S = [(1 mol)S(Ag+(aq)) + (1 mol)S(Cl–(aq))] – [(1 mol)S(AgCl(s)] = [(72.68 J·K–1) +(56.5 J·K–1)] – [96.2 J·K–1] = 33.0 J·K–1 G = [(1 mol)Gf(Ag+(aq)) + (1 mol)Gf(Cl–(aq))] – [(1 mol)Gf(AgCl(s)] = [(77.11 kJ) +(–131.23 kJ)] – [–109.79 kJ] = 55.67 kJ (a) The calculated results support the solubilities discussed in Chapter 2. The negative G for dissolving KCl(s) indicates that it will dissolve in water and our solubility rules suggest that ionic compounds of alkali metal cations and halide anions (each with a single charge) should be soluble. In fact, we observed that potassium salts are quite soluble in water. The positive G for dissolving AgCl(s) indicates that it will not be spontaneous, even though it is also an ionic compound with a single charge on each ion. However, we pointed out in Chapter 2 that AgCl(s) (and the other silver halides) is an insoluble salt, so the positive G is not really a surprise. (b) The solubility of KCl(s) should increase as the temperature is increased. With increasing temperatures, the value of TS will grow larger, which will make G (= H – TS) more negative. (c) The solubility of AgCl(s) should also increase as the temperature is increased, because S is positive, as in part (b). However, the enthalpy is so large and positive that increasing the temperature even to the boiling point of water will still yield a large positive value for G and the dissolution will not occur to an appreciable extent. Problem 8.56. (a) We can use data from Appendix B to find Go at 298 K for the conversion of ethyne to benzene, 3C2H2(g) C6H6(l): G = (1 mol)Gf(C6H6(l)) – (3 mol)[Gf(C2H3(g))] = (124.3 kJ) – 3·(209.20 kJ) = –503.30 kJ Under standard conditions, G = G, and the reaction is spontaneous in the direction written, that is to produce benzene from ethyne. (b) In the reaction converting gaseous ethyne to liquid benzene, the number of moles of gas decreases from three to zero, so the standard entropy change for this reaction, S, should be relatively large and negative [more negative than –300 J·K–1 according to the reasoning in the solution to Problem 8.54(c)]. The –TS term in the expression, G = H = TS, should be positive and relatively large, so there will be a temperature above which the decrease in entropy will dominate and G = G > 0 for the ethyne-to-benzene conversion at standard pressure. Under these conditions, the decomposition of benzene to ethyne, the reverse reaction, will be spontaneous. We can check the entropy values in Appendix B to see whether our reasoning is correct. For the ethyne-to-benzene conversion: S = (1 mol)S(C6H6(l)) – (3 mol)[S(C2H3(g))] = (173.3 J·K–1) – 3·(200.94 J·K–1) = –429.52 J·K–1 This result confirms our reasoning that the standard entropy change for the reaction is large and negative. If we assume that the standard enthalpy and entropy changes are independent of ACS Chemistry FROG 67 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 temperature, we can get an estimate of the temperature at which G = G = 0 and the ethyneto-benzene conversion changes from being spontaneous to nonspontaneous. This temperature will probably be fairly high, so it makes more sense to do the calculations for the reaction producing gaseous benzene, 3C2H2(g) C6H6(g): H = (1 mol)Hf(C6H6(g)) – (3 mol)[Hf(C2H3(g))] = (82.9 kJ) – 3·(226.73 kJ) = –597.3 kJ S = (1 mol)S(C6H6(g)) – (3 mol)[S(C2H3(g))] = (269.31 J·K–1) – 3·(200.94 J·K–1) = –333.51 J·K–1 o TG = 0 = H S o 3 = (–597.3 10 J) (–333.51 J K –1 ) 1800 K Note that the standard entropy change for the gas phase reaction is not as negative as that for the reaction giving liquid benzene. This reflects the fact that the decrease in moles of gas is from three to one, so the entropy decrease is not as large. Problem 8.57. (a) We can use data from Appendix B to calculate H, S, and G at 298 K for the reaction: N2H4(l) + H2O2(l) N2(g) + 2H2O(l). The relevant thermodynamic quantities are: compound N2H4(l) H2O2(l) N2(g) H2O(l) Hf, kJ·mol–1 50.63 –187.78 0 –285.83 S, J·K–1·mol–1 121.21 109.6 191.61 69.91 Gf, kJ·mol–1 149.34 –120.35 0 –237.13 H = {(1 mol)Hf[N2(g)] + (2 mol)Hf[H2O(l)]} – {(1 mol)Hf[N2H4(l)] + (1 mol)Hf[H2O2(l)]} = (0 kJ) + 2·(–285.83 kJ) – (50.63 kJ) – (–187.78 kJ) = – 434.51 kJ S = {(1 mol)S[N2(g)] + (2 mol)S[H2O(l)]} – {(1 mol)S[N2H4(l)] + (1 mol)S[H2O2(l)]} = (191.61 J·K–1) + 2·(69.91 J·K–1) – (121.21 J·K–1) – (109.6 J·K–1) = 100.6 J·K–1 G = {(1 mol)Gf[N2(g)] + (2 mol)Gf[H2O(l)]} – {(1 mol)Gf[N2H4(l)] + (1 mol)Gf[H2O2(l)]} = (0 kJ) + 2·(–237.13 kJ) – (149.34 kJ) – (–120.35 kJ) = –503.25 kJ (b) The standard Gibbs free energy change for this reaction is large and negative. Under standard conditions the reaction is spontaneous with a large “driving force.” Since the enthalpy change for the reaction is large and negative and the entropy change is large and positive, the reaction should be spontaneous under essentially all conditions (see Problem 8.45), unless either the enthalpy or entropy is highly dependent on changes in conditions, which is not likely. (c) As the temperature increases, the –TS term will get larger and more negative, making G larger and more negative. Increasing the temperature makes the reaction even more favorable. At higher temperatures, the hydrazine, hydrogen peroxide, and water will vaporize and this will 68 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization require some thermal energy, but there is a great deal released in the reaction, so this will not change the sign of G. Problem 8.58. (a) Use the data from Appendix B to calculate H, S, and G for the reaction that converts pyruvic acid to ethanal and carbon dioxide, CH3COC(O)OH(l) CH3CHO(l) + CO2(g): H = {(1 mol)Hf[CH3CHO(l)] + (1 mol)Hf[CO2(g)]} – {(1 mol)Hf[CH3COC(O)OH(l)]} = {(–192.30 kJ) + (–393.51 kJ)} – (–584.5 kJ) = –1.3 kJ S = {(1 mol)S[CH3CHO(l)] + (1 mol)S[CO2(g)]} – {(1 mol)S[CH3COC(O)OH(l)]} = {(160.2 J·K–1) + (213.74 J·K–1)} – (179.5 J·K–1) = 194.4 J·K–1 G = {(1 mol)Gf[CH3CHO(l)] + (1 mol)Gf[H2O(l)]} – {(1 mol)Gf[CH3COC(O)OH(l)]} = {(–128.12 kJ) + (–394.36 kJ)} – (–463.38 kJ) = –59.10 kJ To check the internal consistency of these values, calculate H – TS and compare the result to G: H – TS = (–1.3 kJ) – (298 K)(0.1944 kJ·K–1) = –59.2 kJ This value is identical (within the uncertainties of the data values) to that calculated from standard free energies of formation. (b) The reaction is spontaneous under standard conditions, since G = G < 0. (c) Compressing a gas decreases its entropy (less volume to spread out in), so the entropy of the CO2 would decrease, if its pressure is raised to 100 atm. This change would decrease the positive entropy change for the reaction. (d) Since the positive entropy change decreases, if the pressure of the CO2 is increased, the free energy change will be less negative at the higher pressure, that is, there will be a lower driving force for the reaction and the reaction will be less likely to proceed as written (although it will still be spontaneous under these conditions). (e) Le Chatelier’s principle says that a system at equilibrium will react to a disturbance in a way that minimizes the effect of the disturbance. If the stress on the system in this case is an increase in the concentration (molecules per liter) of a product (increased pressure of CO2), the reaction will go in reverse to relieve the stress and use up some of the products. The free energy change is in this same direction—less tendency to form products [see part (d)], so the prediction based on Le Chatelier’s principle is consistent with the thermodynamic analysis. Problem 8.59. (a) We can use data from Appendix B to calculate H, S, and G at 298 K for the water gas reaction: C(s) + H2O(g) CO(g) + H2(g). The relevant thermodynamic quantities are: ACS Chemistry FROG 69 Entropy and Molecular Organization compound C(s) H2O(g) CO(g) H2(g) Hof, kJ·mol–1 0 –241.82 –110.53 0 Chapter 8 So, J·K–1·mol–1 5.740 188.83 197.67 130.68 Gof, kJ·mol–1 0 –228.57 –137.17 0 H = {(1 mol)Hf[CO(g)] + (1 mol)Hf[H2(g)]} – {(1 mol)Hf[C(s))] + (1 mol)Hf[H2O(g)]} = (–110.53 kJ) + (0 kJ) – (0 kJ) – (–241.82 kJ) = – 131.29 kJ S = {(1 mol)S[CO(g] + (1 mol)S[H2(g)]} – {(1 mol)S[C(s)] + (1 mol)S[H2O(g)]} = (197.67 J·K–1) + (130.68 J·K–1) – (5.740 J·K–1) – (188.83 J·K–1) = 133.78 J·K–1 G = {(1 mol)Gf[CO(g] + (1 mol)Gf[H2(g)]} – {(1 mol)Gf[C(s)] + (1 mol)Gf[H2O(g)]} = (–137.17 kJ) + (0 kJ) – (0 kJ) – (–228.57 kJ) = –91.40 kJ Under standard conditions at 298 K, the reaction is not spontaneous: G = Go > 0. (b) Since the entropy change for the reaction is large and positive. increasing the temperature will make –TS a larger negative value, which, at high enough temperature, should make G < 0 and make the reaction spontaneous. (c) There is an increase in number of moles of gas in the water gas reaction. If we disturb the system by increasing the gas pressure, Le Chatelier’s principle predicts that the system will respond by using up some of the gas, that is, by going in reverse toward reactants. This is the unfavorable direction for the reaction, so we should decrease the gas pressure to favor products. We also know that the entropy of gases increases as the volume available per molecule increases, so decreasing the pressure (by increasing the volume) will increase the entropy of the gases. Since there are more product than reactant gases, the net change in entropy for this change will be positive, so this thermodynamic argument also suggests lowering the pressure to favor the reaction as written. (d) Parts (b) and (c) suggest raising the temperature and lowering the pressure to favor the reaction. This is choice (iii) among the reaction conditions suggested for consideration. Problem 8.60. [NOTE: The structure in the problem should probably be labeled as a typical fat molecule.] The polar ends of the fat molecules (the right-hand ends in the structure shown) in waxed paper will interact with the polar cellulose molecules (by H bonding) that make up paper and “cover” them with a hydrophobic layer of the nonpolar ends of the fat molecules sticking out from the cellulose polymeric chains. Water molecules will contact this hydrophobic layer and not be able to interact with the polar cellulose. The strong interaction of water molecules with one another (H bonding) will hold the water together in beads (droplets) on the hydrophobic surface. Problem 8.61. (a) The positional entropy change for methane-water clathrate formation involves a combination of factors. Forming a mixture increases the positional entropy. However, restricting a gas, 70 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization methane, from its usual freedom of motion decreases the positional entropy. Furthermore, formation of the ordered cages of water molecules around the methane molecules decreases the positional entropy of the water. The net effect is a decrease in positional entropy, which is why the solubility of methane in water is low. (b) At lower temperatures, the movement of water molecules is less vigorous and it is easier for them to form the ice-like cages required for clathrate formation. Also, the solution of methane is water is slightly exothermic. At lower temperatures the positive thermal entropy change in the surroundings will be greater than at higher temperatures, thus favoring the solution of methane and formation of the clathrate. (c) At higher pressures, the entropy of the gas decreases because its volume decreases and there is less room for molecules to move around. The difference in entropy between the gas and the gas molecules dissolved in water becomes less, so the decrease in entropy for methane dissolving becomes smaller. Overall, this means that the positional entropy change for dissolving and clathrate formation becomes a bit more favorable and clathrate formation more favored. Problem 8.62. Benjamin Franklin found that a teaspoon of oil poured on the surface of a calm pond spread out to form an oil patch about 1/2-acre in area. If Franklin’s oil patch is a continuous film of oil one molecule thick, then we can equate the volume of one teaspoon of oil with the volume of the one-molecule thick layer. If we further assume that oil molecules are a simple shape, like cubes, that stack together as tightly as possible in both the three dimensional and two dimensional case, we can figure out the size of the molecule (cube). A teaspoon holds about 5 mL of liquid or about 5 10–6 m3. An acre is about 4000 m2; a half acre is about 2 103 m2. If the side of the cubic oil molecule is d meters long, the volume of the oil film is (2 103 m2)(d m) = 2d 103 m3. Setting the two volumes equal and solving for d, gives d = 2.5 10–9 m = 2.5 nm = 2500 pm. Carbon-carbon bond lengths are about 150 pm and oil or fat molecules contain at least 50 carbons, so a molecule similar in shape to a phospholipid could be folded about in such a way as to have a diameter of about 2500 pm. Franklin’s observation more than 200 years ago (before Dalton proposed his atomic model for matter) is in accord with what we now know about molecular structure. Problem 8.63. For ambiphilic compounds with the same polar head but non-polar tails of different lengths, the lengths of the tails can affect the ability of the compounds to form micelles in water. Micelles can form when the size of the polar heads is large enough to cover the roughly spherical volume occupied by the hydrophobic tails tucked inside the “shell” of polar heads, as shown in Figure 8.20(c) and reproduced here: ACS Chemistry FROG 71 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 If the nonpolar tails are too long, the polar heads are not large enough to form a shell that can completely enclose them, as shown in this drawing: As the tails get longer, micelles are harder to form and the ambiphiles become less soluble or perhaps form other, more extended structures more like bilayers. Problem 8.64. (a) Suppose you add a little bit of an ambiphilic compound that can’t form micelles in water because its non-polar tail is too long to a system of liquid water with a less dense non-polar liquid floating on it. The molecules of the ambiphile will collect at the interface between the two phases with their nonpolar tails in the upper nonpolar liquid and their polar heads in the water: (b) Suppose you add more of the ambiphilic compound to the system in part (a). Since the ambiphile cannot form a micelle in water, it will preferentially dissolve in the nonpolar solvent and form a “reversed” micelle with the nonpolar tails on the outside and the polar heads inside: Problem 8.65. Experiments to test the feasibility of extracting solutes from the water by getting them to dissolve in the reversed micellin a non-polar liquid are being carried out in several laboratories. The polar head probably has to have some hydrogen bonding properties, in order to compete with water for solutes that are hydrogen bonded with water. Ions that are hydrated but do not hydrogen bond to water might be extracted by polar heads that can chelate the ions, in order to compete with hydration by the water molecules. 72 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization [NOTE: Among other systems, experiments are being done with reversed micelles and liquid CO2 as the non-polar liquid to see if such extractions from water can be done without generating a lot of waste solvents that could pollute the environment. See Chemistry & Engineering News, September 29, 1997, page 6, for photos demonstrating the extraction.] Problem 8.66. (a) In order to calculate how many phospholipid molecules are required to form the cell membrane of hepatocytes, cubical cells with edge lengths of about 15 10–6 m, we have to make an assumption about the area of the surface of the cell membrane occupied by a phospholipid molecule. You could make a model of the glycerol molecule and the next few atoms bonded to it in the phospholipid shown in Figure 8.22 and then measure the size with the scale that comes with the model set. The measurement is probably different in different dimensions, but we will assume that the “shoulders” of each molecule occupy a square that is about 500 pm (500 10–12 m) on a side. The area of this square is 2.5 10–19 m2. The area of one surface of the cell is (15 10–6 m)2 = 2.3 10–10 m2 and there are six sides, so the outside area of the cell surface is 1.4 10–9 m2. The membrane is a bilayer and we will assume that the area of both the inner and outer surfaces is the same, so the total area that must be covered is 2.8 10–9 m2. The number of phospholipid molecules required to cover this area is about: (2.8 10 –9 m 2 ) (2.5 10 –19 m 2 ) = 1 1010. (b) The number of moles represented by 1 1010 phospholipid molecules is: (1 1010 molecules) (6 10 23 molecules mol –1 ) ≈ 2 10–14 mol To determine the mass of this many moles, we need the molar mass of a phospholipid. There are a great variety of phospholipids with different molar masses. Use the model shown in Figure 8.22 to get an idea of the molar mass. The molecule shown has the formula, C44H86O8NP, with a molar mass of 8 102 g. Thus, the mass of phospholipid in the hepatocyte membrane is about (8 102 g·mol–1)(2 10–14 mol) = 2 10–11 g·= 20 pg (picogram). For comparison purposes, the mass of the cell, assuming a density of 1 g·mL–1 = 1 106 g·m–3, is (1 106 g·m–3)(15 10–6 m)3 = 3 10–9 g = 3000 pg This calculation suggests that the outer membrane phospholipids make up a little less than 1% of the mass of the cell. There are many internal structures in a cell that are also enclosed in phospholipid bilayer membranes and these add to the mass of phospholipid just calculate. Problem 8.67. Mayonnaise is basically a mixture of oil and water that does not separate (at least, it is not supposed to separate). This sort of mixture is called an emulsion. In order to prevent separation, egg yolk is added to the mixture. The phospholipids in the added yolk form micelles that hold the oil in their interiors (like a detergent micelle) and keep the mixture from separating. Problem 8.68. The more uniformly the phospholipid molecules can stack together, side by side, in a bilayer membrane, the less freedom each has to move about. Good stacking leads to a “stiffer” membrane in which molecules are limited in their motion. To make the membrane more flexible ACS Chemistry FROG 73 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 or fluid, the organism needs to disrupt the uniform stacking. Note from Figure 8.22 that double bonds (unsaturation) in the fatty acid chain makes the chain kinked, so it cannot pack as uniformly with its neighbors. Thus, a cold-water fish would probably have more unsaturated fatty acids in its phospholipids, in order to increase the fluidity of its membranes even as the temperature tends to stiffen them. The properties of fats and oils provide a familiar analogy. Fats and oils are esters of glycerol with three fatty acids bonded to the alcohol groups. The difference between a fat and an oil is that a fat is a solid at room temperature and an oil is liquid. The cause of this difference is a much higher proportion of unsaturated fatty acid chains in oils. The molecules of oil can’t stack together as easily and must be taken to a lower temperature before they can solidify. Problem 8.69. Aren’t icebergs made of salt water like the ocean water? Icebergs are actually pieces broken off from glaciers that have reached the edge of the sea. Glaciers are made from rain and snow fall which contain only small amounts of dissolved solids, so icebergs are not salty. Even if icebergs were made by freezing ocean water, they would contain only small amounts of salt, because pure solid solvent (water) crystallizes from the solution, not a solid containing sodium ions, chloride ions, and water molecules. Problem 8.70. The entropy of a solution (a mixture of solvent and soluble solute particles) is greater than the entropy of the pure solvent, because the positional entropy in the mixture is greater. The entropy of a pure liquid solvent is greater than the entropy of its solid, because the particles in the liquid have the entire volume of the liquid available to them, but those in the solid are stuck in one place in the crystal lattice. Thus, we have: Ssolution > Ssolvent > Ssolid. Problem 8.71. Colligative properties depend on entropy differences between two solutions or solution and pure solvent. These differences depend on the number of arrangements of the particles and not the interactions between particles, so colligative properties depend only on the number of solute particles and not their chemical properties. Problem 8.72. Freezing point lowering is a colligative property, so its magnitude depends on the number of particles (ions or molecules) in a given volume of a solution. Assuming that the solutions in this problem are aqueous and that each of the ionic salts dissociates completely in solution, we get 2, 3, and 4 moles of ions per liter, respectively, from compounds (i) NaCl, (ii) CaBr2, and (iii) Al(NO3)3. The aluminum nitrate solution will have the lowest freezing point. Problem 8.73. Most antifreeze products available today contain ethylene glycol, HOCH2CH2OH (1,2-ethanediol), which is a relatively nonvolatile liquid that is miscible with water. Dissolving antifreeze in water lowers the freezing point of the solution, so the liquid is protected from freezing in cold weather. If the coolant solution freezes in your radiator or engine, it can cause a great deal of damage, because it expands upon freezing and can break an engine block. A second great advantage of ethylene glycol is that it increases the boiling point of its aqueous 74 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization solutions, so your engine is less likely to boil over in the summer. Thus, this antifreeze might also be called “antiboil.” Problem 8.74. Each of these 1.5 m solutions has the same molality, but not the same number of particles in solution. MgCl2 dissolves to give three moles of particles per mole dissolved (a mole of Mg2+(aq) cations and two moles of Cl–(aq) anions). NaCl dissolves to give two moles of particles per mole dissolved (a mole of Na+(aq) cations and a mole of Cl–(aq) anions). Glucose does not ionize or dissociate, so it dissolves to give one mole of solute per mole dissolved. Since freezing point lowering is a colligative property that depends on the number of solute particles in the solution, 1.5 m MgCl2 would give the greatest freezing point lowering. Problem 8.75. The freezing point of a solution made by dissolving 5.00 g of sucrose, C12H22O11, in 100.0 g of water can be calculated from the freezing point lowering expression, Tfp = kfp·m. The freezing point lowering constant for water is –1.86 C·m–1. The molality of the solution is the number of moles of sucrose per kilogram of solvent: 5.00 g sucrose (in 100.0 g water) = (5.00 g 1 mol sucrose 1 sucrose) 342.3 g 0.1000 kg water = 0.146 m Tfp = kfp·m = (–1.86 C·m–1)(0.146 m) = –0.272 C Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (0 C) + (–0.272 C) = –0.272 C Problem 8.76. (a) The molality of a solution of 10.00 g of n-decane, CH3(CH2)8CH3, dissolved in 100.00 g of benzene is: 1 mol decane 1 10.00 g decane = (10.00 g decane) = 0.7452 m 134.2 g 0.10000 kg benzene (b) The freezing point lowering of this solution is: Tfp = kfp·m = (–5.12 C·m–1)(0.7452 m) = –3.82 C (c) The freezing point of the solution is: Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (5.50 C) + (–3.82 C) = 1.68 C Problem 8.77. (i) A 0.30 m solution in benzene has a freezing point lowering and freezing point of: Tfp = kfp·m = (–5.12 C·m–1)(0.30 m) = –1.5 C Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (5.50 C) + (–1.5 C) = 4.0 C (ii) A 0.10 m solution in cyclohexane has a freezing point lowering and freezing point of: Tfp = kfp·m = (–20.2 C·m–1)(0.10 m) = –2.0 C Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (6.5 C) + (–2.0 C) = 4.5 C ACS Chemistry FROG 75 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 The benzene solution will freeze at a lower temperature. Problem 8.78. (a) An aqueous solution of 1.0 m sodium chloride is predicted to have a freezing point of – 3.72 C, because the salt dissolves to give two ions. Thus, the molality of particles in the solution is 2.0 m and the predicted freezing point lowering and freezing point are: Tfp = kfp·m = (–1.86 C·m–1)(2.0 m) = –3.72 C (data uncertainly gives –3.7 C) Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (0 C) + (–3.72 C) = –3.72 C (b) The actual freezing point of this solution is 3.53 C, because the ions tend to associate (stick together) in solution and not act completely independently. The actual molality of particles is not quite twice the molality of dissolved salt. You can get an estimate of the effective molality of particles from the experimental freezing point lowering: Tfp (–3.53 o C) m= = = 1.9 m kfp (–1.86 o C m –1 ) Problem 8.79. A solution made by dissolving 5.00 g of sodium sulfate, Na2SO4, in 100.0 g of water has three times as many moles of particles as moles of Na2SO4 dissolved, because each mole of the solid dissolved ionizes to give two moles of Na+(aq) cations and one mole of SO42–(aq) anions. The molality, m, of particles in the solution is: 5.00 g Na2SO4 = (5.00 g 3 mol particles 1 mol Na 2 SO 4 1 Na2SO4) 0.1000 kg H 2O 1 mol Na 2SO 4 142.0 g = 1.056 m The freezing point lowering and freezing point of this solution are: Tfp = kfp·m = (–1.86 C·m–1)(1.056 m) = –1.96 C Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (0 C) + (–1.96 C) = –1.96 C [If the data in Problem 8.78 are correct, it is likely that the actual freezing point of a solution this concentrated will be somewhat higher (closer to zero) than this calculation predicts.] Problem 8.80. The molality, freezing point lowering, and freezing point of a solution of 1.00 g of sorbital, C6H14O6, in 100.0 g of water are: 1 mol Na 2 SO 4 1 1.00 g C6H14O6 = (1.00 g C6H14O6) = 0.0549 m 0.1000 kg H 2O 182 g Tfp = kfp·m = (–1.86 C·m–1)(0.0549 m) = –0.102 C Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (0 C) + (–0.102 C) = –0.102 C 76 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Problem 8.81. To calculate the molality of a solution of 3.5 milligrams of hemoglobin (molar mass = 64,000 g) dissolved in 5.0 mL of water, we assume that 5.0 mL of water is 5.0 g of water. The molality, freezing point lowering, and freezing point of this solution are: 1 mol hemoglobin 1 0.0035 g hemoglobin = (0.0035 g hemoglobin) 0.0050 kg H O 64,000 g 2 = 1.09 10–5 m Tfp = kfp·m = (–1.86 C·m–1)(1.09 10–5 m) = –2.0 10–5 C Tfp(solution) = Tfp(solvent) + Tfp = (0 C) + (–2.0 10–5 C) = –2.0 10–5 C This change is too small to measure, so freezing point depression is not a good method for determining molecular weights of biomolecules, such as proteins. Problem 8.82. The relationship between osmotic pressure, , and the concentration, c (the molarity), of molecules or ions in a solution is: = cRT. The average osmotic pressure of blood serum is 7.7 atm at 25 C. Therefore, to find the molarity of particles in the serum, we can rearrange the osmotic pressure relationship to solve for M at = 7.7 atm: (7.7 atm) c= = = 0.31 M RT (0.08206 L atm K –1 mol–1 )(298 K) The concentration of glucose solution which is isotonic with blood serum (has the same osmotic pressure) is 0.31 M. The concentration of NaCl which is isotonic with blood is 0.16 M, because NaCl ionizes in solution to form two particles, Na+ cations and Cl– anions. Problem 8.83. Suppose 0.150 g of a newly isolated protein dissolved in 25.0 mL of water has an osmotic pressure of 0.00342 atm at 277 K. The molar mass of the solute can be determined from the osmotic pressure that gives the concentration of the solute, c (see the solution to Problem 8.82). The defining equation for the concentration can then be rearranged to calculate the molar mass from the value of the concentration and the mass of solute, m, dissolved in a known volume, V, of solvent: m m R T (0.150 g)(0.08206 L atm K –1 mol–1 )(277 K) molar mass = = = c V V (0.00342 atm)(0.0250 L) = 3.99 104 g·mol–1 Problem 8.84. The osmotic pressure, , is the pressure required to decrease the entropy of a solution to match that of the pure water (or a more dilute solution) on the other side of a semipermeable membrane, so there is no net flow of water through the membrane. If a pressure greater than is applied to the solution, the entropy of the solution will decrease still further and be less than the entropy of the pure water. Under these circumstances, the net entropy will increase, if water molecules pass from solution into the pure liquid. Thus, water will flow from the solution into the pure water. Molecular level pictures can show the volume available to the water molecules ACS Chemistry FROG 77 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 decreasing as the pressure is increased and the solution is compressed a tiny bit. If the pressure is high enough the compression is large enough to make the entropy even lower than for pure water. Problem 8.85. In reverse osmosis, the flow of water is reversed from the direction we associate with regular osmosis. The flow is from solution to pure liquid, rather than the other way around. Purification (desalting) of salt (ocean) water to produce fresh, water for irrigation and drinking is one practical use of reverse osmosis that is being used in arid parts of the world near oceans or seas, such as the Arabian peninsula. [Another method of desalting, flash evaporation with energy supplied by power plants by waste heat from power plants, was discussed as a coupled process in the solution to Problem 7.47. Both these methods are in practical use on very large scales, especially in the middle east. Reverse osmosis is more energy efficient, but flash evaporation competes when the heat energy is available from some source that has another primary use, such as power production.] Problem 8.86. Reverse osmosis (see Problems 8.84 and 8.85) will begin when the applied pressure on the solution just exceeds the osmotic pressure of the solution. Thus, to solve this problem about desalting seawater, we need to find the osmotic pressure, , of the seawater solution. The concentrations are given in ppm instead of molarity, so we have to convert them to moles per liter. We will assume that the ppm are parts per million by mass. For example, 18,000 ppm of Cl– is 18,000 g of chloride ion in one million grams of solution. We will further assume that one million grams of solution is one million mL (or 1000 L) of solution. The number of moles of each ion in 1000 L is: ion Cl– Na+ Mg2+ SO42– K+ concentration, ppm 18000 10500 1200 870 379 TOTAL mol·(1000 L)–1 510 460 50 9 10 1039 The table shows that the total number of moles of ions in 1000 L of the seawater is 1039. Thus, the total ionic molarity of the seawater is 1.04 M. This is the value we need to use to get : = cRT = (1.04 M)(8.314 103 Pa·L·mol–1·K–1)(298 K) = 2.58 106 Pa 25 atm A pressure of above 25 atm has to be exerted on the seawater to get reverse osmosis to occur. This is a high pressure, but not extraordinarily high, so the process is quite feasible. The major technical problem is design of “membranes” that can withstand such pressures, but this is partly solved by constructing them as cylinders with the seawater and high pressure on the outside and fresh water flowing out on the inside. A cylinder can withstand a great deal more pressure (uniformly applied) than a flat surface. 78 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Problem 8.87. The resin coating on the time release plant fertilizer called Osmocote needs to be semipermeable to water. There is little water inside the granules to begin with, so water from the surroundings enters the granules by osmosis and begins to dissolve the fertilizer compounds to form a highly concentrated solution. Osmosis continues to add water to the granules and their size increases (they “swell into plump capsules”). As the granules swell, it is likely that the resin coating finally begins to develop tiny pores through which the contents can ooze and “continuously release nutrients for approximately 9 months.” The product name seems to combine the ideas of a coating (“cote”) that has osmotic (“osmo”) properties. Problem 8.88. The only statement that applies correctly to the growing plant is (ii). The net entropy of the system (plant and its precursor molecules such as carbon dioxide and water) and surroundings (everything else, especially energy from the sun as well as the enormous entropy increase the sun undergoes in producing and spreading the energy into the solar system) increases. For example, photosynthesis occurs to produce more complex molecules from simple ones and uses the energy of electromagnetic radiation from the sun to drive the reaction. As we have just shown, statement (i) is incorrect. Statement (iii) is incorrect, because it would not provide a mechanism for a positive net entropy change for the system plus surroundings. Statement (iv) suggests that there is something about the complexity of biological systems that makes the second law not applicable. No system, simple or complex has yet been found to which the second law does not apply. That is why it is called a “law.” No exceptions have been found. Problem 8.89. (a) A fertilized chicken egg in an incubator (a constant temperature and pressure environment) is an open system. Since gases from the atmosphere can enter the egg, they can act as reactants for reactions within the egg. (b) The same molecules, such as ATP, that are coupled to synthetic reactions in other living things are at work in the egg. They are produced in the same way as in other organisms by oxidation of food molecules (mostly the fat in the yolk) by atmospheric oxygen. The oxidations all have high net positive entropy changes and the hydrolysis of the ATP formed in these processes also has a net positive entropy which can be “harnessed” by coupling the hydrolysis to the synthetic reactions required to form the chick. The net entropy change in the processes is positive and consistent with the second law of thermodynamics. (c) As metabolism occurs in the egg, energy not “captured” in the form of potential energy of chemical bonds (in ATP, for example) is lost from the egg to the surroundings as thermal energy. (If an egg were insulated, so it did not lose thermal energy to its surroundings, it would get warmer.) (d) Free energy must decrease during the chick development process. The overall process is spontaneous, so G < 0. Problem 8.90. (a) Since the polymer product reaction is endothermic, we know that H > 0 for the system. Also, since the reaction is spontaneous, G < 0 for the system. In order for G to be negative, if H is positive, we must have S > 0, so that –TS < 0. ACS Chemistry FROG 79 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (b) The product must have a higher entropy than the reactant, since S > 0. One possibility is for the polymer to be breaking down to smaller pieces, thus giving more freedom of motion to the parts that made up the polymer. This process would require the net breaking of bonds, which would require energy, which is consistent with the observed endothermic reaction. Thus, the most likely reaction is some sort of breakdown of the polymer. Problem 8.91. The data table for this problem is reproduced here for easy reference. Enthalpies of formation and entropies for selected gas-phase hydrocarbons. name formula condensed structural formula ethene propene cyclopropane 1-butene cyclobutane 1-pentene 2-methyl-1-butene 3-methyl-1-butene 2-methyl-2-butene trans-2-pentene cyclopentane 1-hexene cyclohexane 1-heptene 1-octene 1-nonene 1-decene 1-undecene 1-dodecene C2H4 C3H6 C3H6 C4H8 C4H8 C5H10 C5H10 C5H10 C5H10 C5H10 C5H10 C6H12 C6H12 C7H14 C8H16 C9H18 C10H20 C11H22 C12H24 H2C=CH2 H2C=CHCH3 C’s bonded in an equilateral triangle H2C=CHCH2CH3 C’s bonded in a non-planar square H2C=CHCH2CH2CH3 H2C=C(CH3)CH2CH3 H2C=CHCH(CH3)2 H3CCH=C(CH3)2 H3CCH=CHCH2CH3 C’s bonded in a non-planar pentagon H2C=CH(CH2)3CH3 C’s bonded in a non-planar hexagon H2C=CH(CH2)4CH3 H2C=CH(CH2)5CH3 H2C=CH(CH2)6CH3 H2C=CH(CH2)7CH3 H2C=CH(CH2)8CH3 H2C=CH(CH2)9CH3 Hfo kJ mol–1 52.28 20.41 53.30 1.17 26.65 –20.92 –36.62 –28.95 –42.55 –31.76 –77.24 –41.7 –123.1 –62.16 –82.93 –103.5 –124.1 –144.8 –165.4 So J K mol–1 –1 219.8 266.9 237.4 307.4 265.4 347.6 342.0 333.5 338.5 342.3 292.9 386.0 298.2 424.4 462.8 501.2 539.6 578.1 616.5 (a) The difference in bonding between an alkene and the cycloalkane with the same number of carbons is the bonding between carbons. (The number of C–H bonds is the same in both isomers.) The cycloalkane has as many C–C single bonds as there are carbons in the ring. The alkene has a C=C double bond that replaces two of the C–C single bonds. The difference in enthalpy between the two isomers is just the difference between a C=C double bond enthalpy and two C–C single bond enthalpies. Figure 7.9 in Chapter 7 showed this difference graphically. Two C–C single bonds are stronger by 74 kJ·mol–1 than one C=C double bond. Stronger bonding should lead to a more negative enthalpy of formation for the cyclic isomers. This prediction is borne out by the data for the five and six carbon isomers. The enthalpy of formation of cyclopentane is about 56 kJ·mol–1 more negative than the enthalpy of formation of 80 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization 1-pentene. For cyclohexane and 1-hexene, the difference is about 81 kJ·mol–1. Just the opposite is the case for cyclobutane and cyclopropane, which have more positive enthapies of formation than butene and propene, respectively. When you make molecular models of these eight molecules, you find that it is hard to force the ball-and-stick models to make triangular and almost square carbon structures. There is no problem making the five- and six-carbon rings, although the five-carbon ring is still a bit strained. The double bond in the alkenes is a little difficult to form, but the rest of the bonding is easy to model. The smaller rings are strained in the models and they are strained in the real molecules. The strain weakens the bonding between the carbons and makes them weaker than the average bond energies we used in the calculation. Thus, the strain makes cyclopropane and cyclobutane less stable, relative to their elements, than the corresponding alkenes. If the difference between cyclohexane and 1-hexene, 81 kJ·mol–1, represents the difference for a cyclic molecule that is not strained, then we might suppose that cyclopentane is strained by about 25 kJ·mol–1 [= (81 kJ·mol–1) – (56 kJ·mol–1)], because it is only 56 kJ·mol–1 more stable than 1-pentene. By similar reasoning, the strain in cyclopropane is 114 kJ·mol–1 [= (81 kJ·mol–1) – (–33 kJ·mol–1)], because it is 33 kJ·mol–1 less stable than propene and the strain in cyclobutane is 107 kJ·mol–1 [= (81 kJ·mol–1) – (–26 kJ·mol–1)]. (b)This table lists the differences (fourth column) between the standard entropies for the linear and cyclic isomers with 3, 4, 5, and 6 carbons. number of carbons 3 4 5 6 S linear isomer J K–1 mol–1 266.9 307.4 347.6 386.0 S cyclic isomer S (linear – cyclic) J K–1 mol–1 J K–1 mol–1 237.4 32.5 265.4 42.0 292.9 54.7 298.2 87.8 We would expect the linear isomers to have higher entropies, as they do, because the chains are free to flop about into many different forms. The ends of the chain are bonded together in the cyclic isomers: the freedom of bond rotation (floppiness) is lost and the entropy of the cyclic forms is lower. The longer the chain, the more floppy it is and the more freedom of motion is lost going to the cyclic isomer. As we see, the entropy loss for the 6-carbon chain is almost three times as great as for the 3-carbon chain. (c) The enthalpies of formation get more negative and the entropies more positive as the chain lengths increase for the linear 1-alkenes. The data are shown in these two plots: ACS Chemistry FROG 81 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 There is an essentially linear decrease in enthalpy of formation, to become more negative by 21 kJ·mol–1 for each added carbon. Similarly, there is a linear increase in the entropy of about 39 J K–1 mol–1 for each carbon added. Each addition of a CH2 unit to the chain seems to have the same effect. A linear extrapolation of these plots (from the slopes of the lines–the change per added CH2) gives Hf = –207 kJ·mol–1 and S = 695 J K–1 mol–1 for 1-tetradecene, C14H28. The plots look quite linear, so we can be pretty confident that these values for 1-tetradecene are within about 1% of their experimental values. For the enthalpies, we can also use bond enthalpies and the enthalpy of formation of C(g) to estimate the change in enthalpy of formation for adding a CH2 to the chain. reaction H, kJ·mol–1 net change C(s) C(g) 717 vaporize carbon H2(g) 2H(g) 436 break H–H bond C(g) + 2H(g) CH2(g) –828 make two C–H bonds Cn alkene(g) + CH2(g) C(n+1) alkene(g) –347 make C–C bond Cn alkene(g) + C(s) +H2(g) C(n+1) alkene(g) –22 summation This calculated value is very close to the experimental value of –21 kJ·mol–1. (d) An analysis for the cyclic isomers similar to that for the linear isomers is difficult because of the effect of strain in the cyclic isomers. We don’t have enough data and the smaller rings are strained [as we calculated in part (a)], so their values have to be disregarded. The analysis on the basis of bond enthalpies at the end of part (c) is applicable here and predicts about a 22 kJ·mol–1 more negative enthalpy of formation for each additional CH2 in the ring. If we extrapolate this bond enthalpy increment, we would predict a decrease of 44 kJ·mol–1 from cyclohexane and an enthalpy of formation of –167 kJ·mol–1 [= (–123 kJ·mol–1) + (–44 kJ·mol–1)] for cyclooctane, C8H16. [Unfortunately, this analysis is flawed, because rings with more than six carbons are also strained. The six-membered ring, cyclohexane, can twist into two conformations (see Problem 5.39) in which the bond angles around all the carbons are the tetrahedral angle exhibited by linear hydrocarbons. Smaller and larger rings cannot do this, so there is some strain in their structures. The consequence is that (for gas phase molecules) Hf(cycloheptane) = – 116 kJ·mol–1 and Hf(cyclooctane) = –126 kJ·mol–1. These values are essentially the same as for cyclohexane, so the amount of strain energy almost exactly compensates for the increase in bond energy due to the increasing number of CH2 groups in the ring.] Extrapolation of entropy data for the 3-. 4-, 5-, and 6-membered rings is also complicated by what appears to be a non-linear increase in entropy as the CH2 groups are added. The increases in entropy from cyclopropane to cyclobutane and from cyclobutane to cyclopentane are each about 28 J·K–1·mol–1, but the increase from cyclopentane to cyclohexame is only 5 J·K–1·mol–1. Thus, we cannot tell from these data whether the increase per CH2 group added begins to decrease at the 6-membered ring or whether the value for cyclohexane is somehow a problem. The standard entropies for gaseous cycloheptane and cyclooctane are available in the on-line National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Chemistry WebBook at http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/, and we can analyze these entropy data together with those for the smaller rings as shown in this plot: 82 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization The line, with a slope of about 27 J·K–1·mol–1 per carbon atom, is the best straight line through the data points represented by squares. The data point represented by a circle is the standard entropy of gaseous cyclohexane. It appears that there may be a problem with the value for cyclohexane, but this, like the others, is the value given in the NIST Chemistry WebBook, so it is presented on the same basis as the others. Note that, if the standard entropy value for cyclohexane were about 315 J·K–1·mol–1 (where it would fall on the line on this plot), the entropy difference between the linear and cyclic C6H12 isomers in part (a) would be about 71 J·K–1·mol–1. This value would be more in line with the increasing differences as the number of carbons increases in the table in part (a). Perhaps more experiments on the thermodynamics of cyclohexane are needed to resolve apparent anomalies like these, or discover the molecular basis for the cyclohexane value. (e)One way to approach the analysis of the C5H10 alkene isomers is to list the isomers in order of decreasing entropies to see if any trends in the structures and/or enthalpies of formation are discernable. We choose to order on the basis of entropy, because entropy is more obviously related to structure. isomer 1-pentene S, J K–1 mol–1 347.6 Hf, kJ mol–1 –20.92 H2 C CHCH2 CH2 CH3 trans-2-pentene 342.3 –31.76 H3 C structure H 2-methyl-1-butene 342.0 –36.62 CH 3 H2 C 2-methyl-2-butene 338.5 C CH CH 2CH 3 –42.55 C CH 2CH 3 H3 C CH 3 C H3 C 3-methyl-1-butene 333.5 –28.95 C H CH 3 H2 C CHCH CH 3 The table shows that the more compact the structure, the lower its entropy. The most floppy structure is 1-pentene. You can twist its model into many different conformations and it has a ACS Chemistry FROG 83 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 higher entropy than any of the others. At the bottom of the list, 2-methyl-2-butene and 3-methyl-1-butene have little flexibility, except the rotation of their methyl groups. The absolute values of the entropy are high because the molecules are gases and they have many atoms. In general, the more atoms, the higher the entropy. You saw this “complexity” effect in the graph for the entropy as a function of number of carbons in parts (c) and (d). Patterns in the enthalpies of formation are harder to see, but it does seem that the enthalpy of formation (stability) increases as the number of carbons bonded to the double-bonded carbons increases. The least negative values are for 1-pentene and 3-methyl-1-butene, the isomers with only one carbon bonded to the double bond. 2-methyl-2-butene, with three carbons bonded to the double bond has the most negative enthalpy of formation. [But to confuse things just a bit, the standard enthalpy of formation of cis-2-pentene is about –28 kJ·mol–1.] A deeper knowledge of bonding is required to figure out why the stability increases in this way. Problem 8.92. The reaction of breaking water down to its elements is the reverse of the reaction forming water from its elements. The enthalpy change for the breakdown has the same magnitude, but is opposite in sign to the enthalpy of formation of water. The data in Appendix B give the enthalpy of formation of water (gas) as –241.82 kJ·mol–1, from which we get +241.82 kJ·mol–1 for the enthalpy change of the breakdown. This is the net enthalpy associated with breaking four H–O bonds in water and forming two H–H bonds and one O=O bond. Although the value will vary somewhat under nonstandard conditions, it will always be positive, that is, energy will always be required to cause the breakdown. Thus, investors should be wary of an inventor who claims that this process can be made to occur without an input of energy. Catalysts cannot change the overall thermodynamics of a reaction. Problem 8.93. (a) A solution, a mixture of components, has a higher entropy than pure solvent: Ssolution > Ssolvent. (b) Since the enthalpy of vaporization, Hvap, for the same amount of solvent from pure solvent or from a solution are the same, Hvap/T will be the same, at the same temperature, for both pure solvent and a solution. (c) The entropy change of the surroundings, Ssurr, for the vaporization process is –Hvap/T. Hvap is positive (vaporization is an endothermic process) and the same for both pure solvent and a solution [part (b)], so Ssurr < 0 and has the same numerical value for vaporization of pure solvent and a solution. Thus, in order for Snet to be zero, the positional entropy changes for (solvent gas) and (solution gas) must be equal to –Ssurr, that is, be positive and of the same numerical value as Ssurr. (d) We know from part (c) that S(solvent gas) = S(solution gas). Since Ssolution > Ssolvent [from part (a)], we need to have Sgas over solution > Sgas over solvent, in order to have the entropy differences be the same. The relationships are shown in this diagram: 84 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization (e) Since the gas in equilibrium with the solution has the higher entropy, it must have the lower pressure (which is more volume per molecule for a given amount of gas). Thus, the equilibrium pressure of gaseous solvent over a solution is lower than over pure solvent. This is consistent with and explains the lowering of the vapor pressure by a nonvolatile solute. (f) A beaker of water and a beaker of a 1 M aqueous glucose solution are placed side-by-side inside a sealed, transparent container held at constant temperature. In this system, the vapor pressure of water over the pure water is higher than the vapor pressure of water over the sucrose solution. If the vapor pressure of water in the container gets higher than the equilibrium vapor pressure over the sucrose solution, water molecules from the vapor will condense into the solution. This is an example of Le Chatelier’s principle. The disturbance to the equilibrium, solution water vapor, is addition of more water vapor (vaporized from the pure solvent). The solution equilibrium system will respond by trying to use up some of the extra gaseous water, that is, some water vapor will condense in the glucose solution. What we will observe over time is the liquid level in the beaker of pure water decreasing and the liquid level in the beaker of solution increasing. If this process continues for a long time (diffusion of gases is a slow process) all of the water from the beaker of pure water will end up in the beaker of glucose solution, which will be diluted by the process. Problem 8.94. This is a schematic representation of the binding of a substrate molecule in the active site on an enzyme. The bottom diagram shows the interaction of the substrate with a metal ion in solution. + + (a) The free squiggle molecule can move about and twist into whatever shape is allowed by its bonding. In order to bind to the enzyme, one end of the squiggle has to fold into a particular shape. There are fewer ways to do this than to twist about randomly, so the positional entropy of the molecule will decrease as it folds into this particular shape. Also, when two molecules, the enzyme and the squiggle, that are free to move about independently of one another come ACS Chemistry FROG 85 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 together they lose some freedom of movement. This is a further contribution to a decrease in positional entropy. For the binding process shown, the positional entropy will decrease. (b) The complex formed between the squiggle molecule and the metal ion holds the squiggle molecule in the folded form that binds well with the enzyme. The squiggle molecule in the metal-bound form is not free to twist about randomly, so there will not be a great loss of positional entropy when it binds with the enzyme. The freedom of movement through the solution is lost, so the positional entropy will still decrease upon binding, but not as much as in the absence of the metal ion. We are assuming that the presence of the metal in the folded squiggle does not interfere with the binding between the squiggle and the enzyme. An example of a situation like the one pictured here is the binding of ATP to many of the proteins with which it interacts. Many of these interactions do not take place unless magnesium ion, Mg2+(aq), is present in the solution to complex with the ATP and hold it in the proper shape for the interaction. See Chapter 7, Problem 7.48. Problem 8.95. (a) There is only one way to arrange 12 identical solvent molecules in the 12 boxes, as in the lower 12 boxes in Figure 8.4: Wsolvent = 1. Since there are only three boxes and three solute molecules left to arrange, we also have Wsolute = 1. Hence, Wtotal = Wsolvent·Wsolute = 1·1 = 1. (b) If there are nine solvent molecules in the lower nine boxes, this leaves three to arrange among the top six boxes. The number of distinguishable ways to arrange these three identical solvent molecules among the six boxes is the same as the number of ways we got for arranging the three identical solute molecules in these six boxes (Figure 8.5), so Wsolvent = 20. Again, once the solvent molecules are arranged, there is only one way to arrange the solute molecules, so Wsolute = 1. Hence, Wtotal = Wsolvent·Wsolute = 20·1 = 20. This answer is the same as we got before (Figure 85) when we focused on arrangements of solute molecules. (c) If there are six solvent molecules in the lower six boxes, this leaves six to arrange among the top nine boxes. Using the formula in Problem 8.12, we have: 9 8 7 6! 9 8 7 9! N = 9, n = 6: W = = = = 3·4·7 = 84 3 2 1 3!6! (9 6)!6! Again, once the solvent molecules are arranged, there is only one way to arrange the solute molecules, so Wsolute = 1. Hence, Wtotal = Wsolvent·Wsolute = 84·1 = 84. Figure 8.6 and the accompanying text show that there are 84 arrangements of the three solute molecules in the top nine boxes. We get an identical result when we focus on the solvent instead of the solute. (d) With 12 solvent molecules arranged among 15 boxes we have: 15 14 13 15! N = 15, n = 9: W= = = 5·7·13 = 455 3 2 1 (15 9)!3! Again, once the solvent molecules are arranged, there is only one way to arrange the solute molecules, so Wsolute = 1. Hence, Wtotal = Wsolvent·Wsolute = 455·1 = 455. Figure 8.6 and the accompanying text show that there are 455 arrangements of the three solute molecules in the15 boxes. We get an identical result when we focus on the solvent instead of the solute. (e) The above results demonstrate that it makes no difference whether we focus on the solvent or solute. The number of distinguishable arrangements for the system as a whole is the same for each step as the mixing occurs. This has to be true, since there has to be a unique number of distinguishable arrangements for a particular case, no matter how it is calculated. 86 ACS Chemistry FROG Chapter 8 Entropy and Molecular Organization Problem 8.96. At the molecular level, all energies are quantized, including the kinetic energy of motion of molecules in a gas. The energy levels for this motion are so close together that the number of energy levels available is many times more than the number of molecules. Thus, the probability that more than one molecule will occupy any energy level is essentially zero: there will be either one or zero molecules in each energy level. As the volume of the gas increases, the energy levels get even closer together. Consider these energy levels in a 12-unit range of energy for three different total volumes of gas, where V1 < V2 < V3: Our gas consists of three identical molecules to arrange among the available energy levels. A way to approach these problems is to make a table for each case showing the arrangements, their energies, their contribution to the total energy, the total energy, and the average energy per molecule. Here is the table for all three cases with arrangements denoted by showing which energy levels are occupied by the three molecules in each case. arrangement arrangement energy contribution to total energy total energy average energy per molecule V1 (0, 6, 12) 18 units 18 units 18 units 6 units/molecule V2 (0, 4, 8) (0, 4, 12) (0, 8, 12) (4, 8, 12) 12 units 16 units 20 units 24 units 3 units 4 units 5 units 6 units 18 units 6 units/molecule V3 (0, 3, 6) (0, 3, 9) (0, 3, 12) (0, 6, 9) (0, 6, 12) (0, 9, 12) (3, 6, 9) (3, 6, 12) (3, 9, 12) (6, 9, 12) 9 units 12 units 15 units 15 units 18 units 21 units 18 units 21 units 24 units 27 units 0.9 units 1.2 units 1.5 units 1.5 units 1.8 units 2.1 units 1.8 units 2.1 units 2.4 units 2.7 units 18 units 6 units/molecule ACS Chemistry FROG 87 Entropy and Molecular Organization Chapter 8 (a) The results for the molecules in a volume V1 are shown in the first section of the table. We sum the energies of the molecules, 0 units + 6 units + 12 units = 18 units, to get the energy of the single possible arrangement. Since this is the only arrangement possible, it is the only contributor to the total energy, which must, therefore, be 18 units. There are three molecules in the system, so the average energy per molecule is (18 units)/(3 molecules) = 6 units/molecule. (b) The four possible arrangements and the energy of each for the intermediate volume, V2, case are shown in the second section of the table. Since there are four equally probable arrangements (equally probable by our fundamental assumption that all distinguishable arrangements are equally probable), we divide the energy of each one by four to get its contribution to the total energy and then sum the resulting values to get the total energy, 18 units, and the average energy per molecule, 6 units/molecule. (c) For the largest volume case, third section of the table, we find 10 arrangements of the three molecules among the five energy levels. Therefore, we have to divide the energy of each one by 10 to get its contribution to the total energy of the system. Summing these contributions, we once again find a total energy, 18 units, and average energy per molecule, 6 units/molecule. (d) It may seem surprising to find that the total energy and average energy per molecule are the same in all these cases. This is because we have restricted the molecules to energies in the range from zero to 12 units and have chosen equally spaced energy levels in all cases. The average molecular energy will always be in the middle of the energy range (6 units) and the three of them together will, therefore, have a total energy of 18 units. In a gas consisting of a large number of molecules, on the order of Avogadro’s number, there is also a range of energy levels accessible to the molecules at a given temperature. These levels are extremely closely spaced and we can assume that the spacing is essentially equal. The number of levels increases (and spacing decreases) as the volume of the gas increases, but the range of energy remains the same, if the temperature of the gas remains constant. Our results suggest, therefore, that the average energy per molecule and hence the total energy of the system remains constant as the number of energy levels in the range increases. This is consistent with the energy of an ideal gas not being a function of the volume of the gas at constant temperature. (e) Note that the results are the same for the number of distinguishable arrangements of three identical molecules among five different energy levels in part (c) and of three identical objects among five labeled boxes in Investigate This 8.4(a). In energy-quantized molecular systems, the different (distinguishable) translational energy quantum levels take the place of the boxes in our spatial representation of distinguishable arrangements of molecules and, for these countable systems give identical results. In real systems, the distinguishable arrangements of molecules among quantized translational energy levels is what gives rise to what we have called “positional entropy.” Thus, entropy is always a measure of the spreading out of energy, either molecules among translational energy levels or energy quanta spread among the internal motions of the molecules (or vibrations in a crystal). 88 ACS Chemistry FROG