Production Model Grading Rubric
5 pt
Exceptional
4pts
Proficient
Construction
Student’s
model was
neatly
constructed
and assembled.
Student’s
model was
neatly
constructed.
Scale
Student’s
model was
100% accurate
to the scale
they said they
built in.
Student’s
model was
80% accurate
to the scale
they said they
built in.
Set Dressings
Large Props
and Furniture
3pts
3pts
1-0 pts
Some
Proficiency
Student’s
model was
constructed
and assembled
with some
minor issues.
Student’s
model was
70% accurate
to the scale
they said they
built in.
Limited
Proficiency
Student’s
model was
constructed
and assembles
with some
major issues.
Student’s
model was
50% accurate
to the scale
they said they
built in.
Does not meet
expectations
Student’s
model was
falling apart.
Design could
fit on our
stage.
Stage
Measurements
Materials
Name ________________________
Student’s
model was
built entirely
out of
acceptable
materials
(wood, foam
board,
cardboard,
balsa wood,
etc).
Student’s
model had
excellent set
dressings
(wallpaper,
pictures, floor
coverings, etc)
Student’s
model
included all
large props
and furniture.
Student’s
model was
built mostly (at
least 75%) out
of acceptable
materials
(wood, foam
board,
cardboard,
balsa wood,
etc).
Student’s
model had
great set
dressings
(wallpaper,
pictures, floor
coverings, etc)
Student’s
model
included most
major props
and furniture.
Student’s
model was less
than 50% to
the scale they
said they built
in.
Design could
not fit on our
stage.
Student’s
model was
built out of
acceptable
materials for at
least ½ of the
model.
Student’s
model was
built out of
acceptable
materials for at
less than ½ of
the model.
Student’s
model was
built out of
unacceptable
materials
(playdough,
modeling clay,
legos, etc.)
Student’s
model had
good set
dressings
(wallpaper,
pictures, floor
coverings, etc)
Student’s
model
included ½ the
major props
and furniture.
Student’s
model had
limited set
dressings
(wallpaper,
pictures, floor
coverings, etc)
Student’s
model
included less
than ½ the
major props
and furniture.
Student’s
model had
little to no set
dressings
(wallpaper,
pictures, floor
coverings, etc)
Student’s
model did not
have any major
props and
furniture.
Use of Color
Student’s
model has an
exceptional
use of color.
Student’s
model has an
excellent use
of color.
Student’s
model has
some color
choices (more
than ½ the
items).
Student’s
model has
limited color
choices (less
than ½ the
items).
Student’s
model has no
color applied
(other than the
natural colors
of the
materials)
Demands of
script
Student’s
model presents
a set capable
of meeting all
the demands of
the script.
Student’s
model shows a
clear effort to
meet the
demands of the
script but is
inconsistent.
Student’s
model
addresses the
basic needs of
the script.
Student’s
model ignores
significant
demands.
Student’s
model applies
none of the
demands the
script requires.
The style is
clearly
presented in
detail and
clarity.
The style is
clearly
presented.
Some elements
of style have
been clearly
presented.
The style of
the set is not
clearly
defined.
No style is
evident.
Student’s
presentation
would have
landed them a
job as the set
designer of a
production
company.
Student’s
presentation
could have
landed them a
job as the set
designer of a
production
company.
Style
Presentation
Notes:
Student’s
presentation
would not have
given them a
job offer of a
production
company.