Paediatric Clinical Guideline Resus/A&E 13.1 February 2002 MANAGEMENT OF THE CHILD WITH A NON-BLANCHING RASH. Children commonly present with a non-blanching rash, with or without other features of illness. They are a diagnostic dilemma. The minority with invasive meningococcal disease and other invasive bacterial infections (about 10%) need to be distinguished from the majority with benign self-limiting illnesses. Recent studies 1-5 have allowed us to derive an evidenced-linked guideline for the management of these children. Differential Diagnosis. The differential diagnosis of a non-blanching rash includes: Meningococcal disease (MCD) Sepsis with other bacteria (uncommon) Viral illnesses Trauma/Mechanical/NAI The following groups are distinct and usually not difficult to diagnose: Idiopathic thrombocytopenia (ITP) Henoch Schonlein purpura (HSP) Acute leukaemias Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) They have other specific signs or symptoms: ITP: Usually well children with multiple bruises and petechiae noted over several days HSP: Usually a classical distribution of purpura, bruising and urticaria on the buttocks and extensor surfaces of the limbs, sometimes associated with joint or abdominal pain Acute leukaemias: Symptoms of slower onset associated with anaemia, lymphadenopathy or hepatosplenomegaly HUS: Oliguria/anuria associated with anaemia, usually following a diarrhoeal illness This leaves a further group of children in whom we need to distinguish MCD and other bacterial sepsis, from self- limiting viral illness or trauma. Page 1 of 4 Paediatric Clinical Guideline Resus/A&E 13.1 February 2002 The following algorithm is based on observation and investigation of these children and provides a simple guide to their assessment and management. Prior administration of penicillin does not alter the algorithm but these children should have a senior review prior to discharge in order to reassure parents. Non blanching rash Purpura (lesions >2mm in diameter) Yes Admit and treat as MCD at once (See MCD Protocol) No Ill (irritable, lethargic, toxic) and/or Capillary refill > 2secs and/or Hypotensive Yes No Rash confined to the SVC distribution (above the nipple line) No Admit and observe FBC, blood culture, CRP and meningococcal PCR If well, no spread of rash and CRP<6mg/l, discharge otherwise admit and treat as MCD Page 2 of 4 Yes Discharge if no other clinical concerns Paediatric Clinical Guideline Resus/A&E 13.1 February 2002 References 1. Mandl KD, Stack AM, Fleisher GR. Incidence of bacteraemia in infants and children with fever and petechiae Journal of Pediatrics 1997;131:398-404 2. Brogan P, Raffles A. The management of fever and petechiae: making sense of rash decisions. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:506-507. 3. Marzouk O, Bestwick K, Thomson AP, Sills JA, Hart CA. Variation in serum Creactive protein across the clinical spectrum of meningococcal disease. Acta Paediatr 1993 82:729-33. 4. Nielson HE et al. Diagnostic assessment of haemorrhagic rash and fever. Arch Dis Child 2001 85:160-165. 5. Wells LC, Smith JC, Weston V, Collier J, Rutter N. The child with a non-blanching rash: How likely is meningococcal disease? Arch Dis Child 2001 85:218-222. Page 3 of 4 Paediatric Clinical Guideline Resus/A&E 13.1 February 2002 PAEDIATRIC CLINICAL GUIDELINES ISSUE: VERSION: FINAL Title: Management of the Child with a Non-blanching Rash Author: Job Title: Dr Louise Wells Paediatric Specialist Registrar First Issued: February 2002 Date Revised: Review Date: February 2005 Document Derivation: i.e. References: Included in document Consultation Process: Ratified By: Paediatric Clinical Guidelines Committee Chaired By: Dr Kate Armon Consultant with Responsibility: Dr Stephanie Smith Distribution: Training issues: All wards QMC and CHN Included in Induction Programme Audit: This guideline has been registered with Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust and QMC Clinical Guidelines Committee. However, clinical guidelines are ’guidelines’ only. The interpretation and application of clinical guidelines will remain the responsibility of the individual clinician. If in doubt contact a senior colleague or expert. Caution is advised when using guidelines after the review date. MANUAL AMENDMENTS RECORD (please complete when making any hand-written changes/ amendments to guideline and not processed through guideline committee) Date Page 4 of 4 Author Description