STAGE 2 ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE Assessment Type 1: Communication Study Written Assessment For this task you complete two pieces of writing: 1) An article for the school newsletter in which you present some of the advantages and/or disadvantages of students going overseas for study purposes. This could be either a short or long term period of study. 2) An analysis of the purpose, structure and language features of your article. The combined word count for these two pieces should be a maximum of 500 words. Complete these steps before writing your final responses: read a variety of school newsletter articles given out by the teacher discuss their structure and language features reconstruct an article in groups watch a video about studying overseas and take notes discuss the possible advantages and disadvantages of studying overseas brainstorm ideas for your article organise your ideas into an outline which consists of main ideas and elaboration in point form. Your newsletter article should include: a heading a series of paragraphs topic sentences language that is vivid and makes the topic interesting for the readers vocabulary appropriate to the topic. Your analysis should answer the following: Who will read this article? What is the purpose of this article? How did you structure the article? Why? (comment on length of paragraphs, and what you chose to write about first and what was written about later in the article) What technical, subject-specific words did you use? How did you make your article interesting and informative for the reader? Why did you use the chosen layout and format? Do you think that your article is successful in achieving its purpose? What changes would you make if you were to write another such article? Page 1 of 2 Stage 2 English as a Second Language annotated task for use from 2011 106752001 (Revised July 2010) © SACE Board of South Australia 2010 Performance Standards for Stage 2 English as a Second Language A Knowledge and Understanding Analysis Application Communication Comprehensive knowledge and sophisticated understanding of the ideas, concepts, and issues in texts. Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the purpose, structure, and language features of a range of texts. Comprehensive selection and use of information from a range of sources. Consistently clear and coherent writing and speaking, with a sophisticated vocabulary. Highly effective location, recording, analysis, and synthesis of ideas, information, and opinions from a range of texts. Comprehensive use of textappropriate language features to make meaning. Effective analysis of the relationship between the purpose, structure, and language features of a range of texts. Effective and considered selection and use of information from a range of sources. Usually clear and coherent writing and speaking, with a sound vocabulary. Systematic meaning that is conveyed and exchanged appropriately in familiar and unfamiliar contexts. Evidence of sound grammatical control and complexity. Effective use of text-appropriate language features to make meaning. Proficient use of formal and objective language. Effective interaction with other people in order to obtain or convey information and opinions. Effective use of interpersonal language to sustain spoken interaction. Appropriate selection and use of information from a range of sources. Generally clear and coherent writing and speaking, with an appropriate vocabulary. Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the relationship between contexts and texts. Thorough knowledge and understanding of the ways in which texts are composed for specific purposes and audiences. Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of context-specific or technical vocabulary. B Well-considered knowledge and understanding of the ideas, concepts, and issues in texts. Detailed knowledge and understanding of the relationship between contexts and texts. Effective and considered knowledge and understanding of the ways in which texts are composed for specific purposes and audiences. Effective and considered knowledge and understanding of context-specific or technical vocabulary. C Considered knowledge and understanding of the ideas, concepts, and issues in texts. Appropriate knowledge and understanding of the relationship between contexts and texts. Some considered knowledge and understanding of the ways in which texts are composed for specific purposes and audiences. Some considered knowledge and understanding of context-specific or technical vocabulary. D Some recognition and understanding of the ideas, concepts, and issues in texts. Some recognition and understanding of the relationship between contexts and texts. Some recognition and awareness of the ways in which texts are composed for specific purposes and audiences. Some recognition and understanding of context-specific or technical vocabulary. E Limited recognition or awareness of the ideas, concepts, and issues in texts. Limited awareness of the relationship between contexts and texts. Limited recognition or awareness of the ways in which texts are composed for specific purposes and audiences. Limited recognition or awareness of context-specific or technical vocabulary. Page 2 of 2 Effective and considered location, recording, analysis, and synthesis of ideas, information, and opinions from a range of texts. Appropriate analysis of the relationship between the purpose, structure, and language features of a range of texts. Appropriate location and recording, and some analysis and synthesis of ideas, information, and opinions from a range of texts. Partial recognition of the relationship between the purpose, structure, and language features of a range of texts. Some location, recording, and description of ideas, information, and/or opinions from a text. Limited recognition of the relationship between the purpose, structure, and language features of a range of texts. Attempted location and recording and recount of simple ideas, information, or opinions from a text. Complex meaning that is conveyed and exchanged appropriately in familiar and unfamiliar contexts. Productive interaction with other people in order to obtain or convey information and opinions. Simple meaning that is conveyed and exchanged appropriately in familiar and unfamiliar contexts. Some considered use of textappropriate language features to make meaning. Evidence of sophisticated grammatical control and complexity. Precise use of formal and objective language. Fluent use of interpersonal language to sustain spoken interaction. Evidence of appropriate grammatical control and complexity. Appropriate use of formal and objective language. Appropriate interaction with other people in order to obtain or convey information and opinions. Appropriate use of interpersonal language to sustain spoken interaction. Partial selection and use of information from a narrow range of sources. Occasionally clear and coherent writing and speaking, with a restricted vocabulary. Partial meaning that is conveyed and exchanged in a narrow range of familiar and unfamiliar contexts. Evidence of partial grammatical control and complexity. Partial use of text-appropriate language features to make meaning. Restricted use of formal and objective language. Some interaction with other people in order to obtain or convey simple information and opinions. Basic use of interpersonal language to sustain spoken interaction. Limited selection and use of information from a narrow range of sources. Limited clarity and coherence in writing and speaking, with a limited vocabulary. Limited meaning that is conveyed and exchanged in a narrow range of familiar contexts. Evidence of limited grammatical control or complexity. Attempted use of text-appropriate language features to make meaning. Attempted use of formal and objective language. Attempted interaction with other people in order to obtain or convey simple information and opinions. Attempted use of interpersonal language to sustain spoken interaction. Stage 2 English as a Second Language annotated task for use from 2011 106752001 (Revised July 2010) © SACE Board of South Australia 2010