Diction Definition: Diction refers to the author's choice of words and their usage. Diction, as refers to word usage, is a qualitative term. It refers to the effectiveness of the author's word choices. As it refers to word choice it is more stylistic, referring to the level of the language employed by the author. There are at least two levels of diction, that is, formal and informal. Some would add to these another level, colloquial. Some would take this one more step and add slang, though slang is often included in colloquial speech. Formal diction refers to the language used by educated people when writing scholarly articles or are engaged in some form of elevated discourse. Formal diction consists of sophisticated, often technical, language. It often makes allusions to books, events, or ideas that are rarely understood by those who have not had advanced schooling. It is writing that employs what is often called in colloquial speech "big words," though not all obscure words are large. Formal diction is rarely used in conversation and when it is it usually reflects badly on the person using it. Informal speech refers to the language of educated people as they engage in every day conversation. Cicero, the great Roman orator, is said to have employed formal diction when at the Senate and informal diction when at the dinner table. Informal diction is also the language of most journalism and other forms of writing intended for mass consumption. Those who recognize two levels of diction would include colloquial speech in this definition. Colloquial speech is the language associated with those with little education. Educated people probably use colloquial speech in certain social situations, as those with little or no formal education may on occasion use informal diction. An example of formal diction would be the science textbook on meteorology. An example of informal diction would be the weathercaster on the evening news. An example of colloquial diction might be the street corner discussions of the weather. Those who include slang as a level of diction are referring to those words that are newly invented and not formally recognized by society at large. They are often short lived, but not always. (Cool, for example keeps finding its way back into the slang vocabulary.) The difficulty with slang as a level of language is that it lacks a complete vocabulary. To express complete thoughts slang terms must surround themselves with words that have been formally inducted into the language. In practice slang as a level of diction is usually colloquial speech with slang terms mixed in. Questions to ask yourself about the diction used in a given piece: What is the level of language used in the writing? Why did the author choose this level of language? What does the level of language tell me about the character/speaker using it? (For example, if a character uses formal diction at a party it may be a clue we are to see him as pompous. This is an especially important question to ask when reading fiction.) What does the level of language reveal about the author's intended audience and his attitude toward this audience? (For example, formal diction implies a certain amount of education on the part of the reader, where an informal diction may imply less educated reader. A diction that is overly simplistic may reveal an attitude of superiority on the part of the author.) What do specific word choices reveal about what is happening in the work? (For example, a room could be described as cluttered or claustrophobic. It is possible for both words to describe a single room, that is, a claustrophobic room is in all likelihood a cluttered one. But "cluttered" is a less emotionally charged word than "claustrophobic." If an author chooses to describe a room as claustrophobic, what is the significance of that word choice? ) How effective are the author's word choices? If they appear to be poor choices does this reflect on the quality of the writing or is the author deliberately using a poor word choice to tell us something? For example, W. H. Auden in his poem "As I Walked Out One Evening" uses inept and skillful word choices to reveal different things about the different voices that are heard in the poem. The poor word choices are a clue to the immaturity of the individual speaking them, while the more sophisticated word choices of the second voice in the poem are a clue to that speaker's maturity and experience.2 What kinds of words tend to predominate in the writing? (Does the writer, for example, use more verbs than adjectives? Does he seem to prefer shorter words to longer ones?) Are the characters' word choices consistent with what we know about them? If they are not what is the purpose of this inconsistency? (A character may want to conceal from another character that he is well educated. As a result he may deliberately use colloquial speech when we know his normal speech is very sophisticated and refined, or informal speech bordering on formal.) A Checklist of Things to Consider When Analyzing Diction: Diction (word choice) Describe diction by considering the following: Words may be monosyllabic (one syllable in length) or polysyllabic (more than one syllable in length). The higher the ratio of polysyllabic words, the more difficult the content. Words may be colloquial (regional/local language), slang, dialect, informal (conversational), formal (literary), neutral, old-fashioned. Words may be mainly denotative (containing an exact dictionary meaning) or connotative (containing a suggested/implicit meaning). Words may be concrete (specific; describe physical qualities or conditions) or abstract (denotes ideas, emotions, conditions, or concepts that are intangible). \ Words may be euphonious (pleasant sounding), e.g. lovely, or cacophonous (harsh sounding), e.g., grizzled. Words That Describe Language Different from tone, these words describe the force or quality of the diction, images, and details. These words qualify how the work is written, not the attitude or tone. You may want to use these words to describe diction. jargon pedantic poetic vulgar euphemistic moralistic scholarly pretentious slang insipid sensuous idiomatic precise exact concrete esoteric learned cultured connotative symbolic picturesque plain simple homespun literal figurative provincial colloquial bombastic trite artificial abstruse obscure detached grotesque precise emotional concrete exact Connotation The implied overtones of a word, the coloration or shade of meaning the word suggests, the emotional and tonal qualities that come to be associated with words. When words are used for their connotations in an argument you might ask yourself the following questions: Does the author of the essay select words for what they suggest rather than for their literal meanings? Why does the author choose to shade her or his meanings? How far from the literal meaning of the word do the connotations take the reader? a. Does the author suggest a meaning that is nearly opposite from what the literal meaning of the words would be or is it fairly close? b. If the suggested meaning is far from the literal meaning what purpose is served by this irony? (1) Marc Antony in his famous "Friends, Romans, Countrymen" speech begins by saying Brutus is an honorable man and he wants his audience to believe he is sincere because the audience likes Brutus and he does not want to offend them. Once he has won the audience to his side, his references to Brutus as an honorable man become ironic, dripping with sarcasm, because his ultimate goal is to convince the audience to rebel against Brutus and his fellow conspirators. c. If the suggested meaning is fairly close to the literal meaning, what is suggested by the subtle nuance that the writer or speaker is giving to the word or words? How do these "overtones" strengthen or weaken the argument? Because the majority of words in an essay will be selected for their literal meanings, what, if anything, can be inferred by the author's choice of words for what they suggest as opposed to what they literally mean? Is there a relationship, for example, between words selected for their denotations and those selected for their connotations? Denotation Denotation is the literal or dictionary meaning of a word. When words are used for their literal meanings in an argument you might ask yourself the following questions: Does the author choose words precisely for their literal meanings? What appears to be the author's purpose in using words in this way? Explain. How is the argument strengthened or weakened by this literal use of language? Explain. What does the use of language in this way suggest about the author's view of her or his audience? Explain. If words have been selected for what they suggest, as opposed to what they literally mean (for their connotations) do any relationships exist between these words and those selected for their literal meaning?