NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 1 of 11 Assessment Schedule – 2008 Geography: Apply skills and ideas, in a geographic context (90334) Evidence Statement Question Evidence One (a) (i) Satellite / Aerial Photography A: the topography is flat / plain B: the topography is rolling / hill country. (a) (ii) A: there is intensive land use B: the land use is less intensive / extensive. Correct answers. (b) Topography Satellite: Block B: Shadows on hills / in valleys show hilly topography. Aerial Photo: Can see edge of hilly country and start of flat / rectangular paddocks show that the land is flat in A. Refers to evidence from ONE resource only or from both resources but only one of topography or land use. eg Topography: In the aerial photograph, you can tell the land is flat in A by the large numbers of square or rectangular paddocks. eg Land Use: In the satellite image, the red colour shows that there is a pasture growing well in A compared to tussock in B. Refers to evidence from BOTH resources for BOTH land use and topography. States which resource is better and gives a brief explanation of why ONE resource is preferred. eg The satellite image is better because it is easier to see the shadows on it. States which resource is better and gives a detailed explanation of why ONE resource is preferred. See Evidence column. The satellite image is better because the shadows on it show whether the land is hilly; the colours show how much the vegetation is growing. Land Use Satellite: Key tells you the land use. Satellite: Colour showed vegetation type. Aerial Photo: the pattern of many flat, rectangular paddocks show that the land is used intensively in A. NB If refer to Block A and B, then infer Aerial Photo. If refer to Key, then Satellite is implied. (c) There is no definitive answer but a possible answer may be: Satellite is better because uses key / can see shadows on the land make it easy to see the shape of the land / colours show vegetation / can see shapes / intensity of farming in A. Satellite is better for determining both land use and topography. Aerial Photo is better because can see blocks of land outlined by white roads / infrastructure. The satellite image is also better to use to distinguish land use intensity because you can tell by the colour whether the vegetation is growing well. Achievement Merit Correct answers. Excellence NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 2 of 11 Question Two Three Evidence Précis Map See Appendix A. Bar Graph Interpretation Positive: More pasture is produced on irrigated land than dry land, particularly for irrigated sheep farming. Negative: Irrigated land has more soil compaction than dry land farming for both land uses but particularly for cattle. Achievement Merit Must have: Must have: (i) SH83 located within outer area. (i) SH83 located accurately within inner area – must have bend. (ii) Bortons Pond within exterior. (ii) Bortons Pond within inner area – must have accurate shape. (iii) Millers Pond located within outer area. (iii) Millers Pond located within correct inner area. (iv) Queens Flat discharge outlet within outer area. (iv) Queens Flat discharge outlet within inner area. Provides a brief description of ONE impact. eg More pasture grown on irrigated land. Livestock on irrigated land causes the soil to compact more. Provides a brief description of TWO impacts. See Achievement column. OR Provides an in-depth description of ONE impact. eg The total pasture yield on both dairy and sheep irrigated land is more than double that produced on dry land farms. The difference, for example, for dairy is approximately 9 tonnes dry matter per hectare. More compaction on irrigated land as soil spaces reduced, which impacts on drainage and water holding capacity of soils. Excellence Provides a comprehensive description of BOTH impacts. See Merit column. NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 3 of 11 Question Evidence Four (a) Triangular Graphing Plots age structures on the triangular graph. See Appendix B. Accurately plots TWO or THREE age structures. All FOUR without labels. Accurately plots FOUR age structures. Possible answers may include: Gives ONE point of difference AND / OR similarity. See Evidence column. May compare to any one other area, eg just Christchurch. Gives TWO points of difference AND / OR similarity. Must refer to all areas. See Evidence column. Briefly describes TWO population trends. See Evidence column. Describes ONE population trend in depth, eg detailed description with use of dates / towns / statistics Describes population trends comprehensively with TWO in depth. OR ONE in depth See Merit column. AND Identifies ONE population trend at an Achievement level. Eg Most of the towns have experienced population decline from 1996 to 2006. These areas include Oamaru, which has declined from 12 015 in 1996 to 11 232 in 2006. The population in some towns has fluctuated. For example, Ardgowan went down from 462 in 1996 to 459 in 2001 but went up to 501 in 2006. See Merit column. (b) Five All places have the largest percentage in the 15–65 age group. All places have the similar percentage in the under 15 age group. Waitaki has the largest percentage over 65 years. Waitaki has the smallest percentage in the 15–65 age group. Waitaki has an ageing / aged population structure compared to other places. Table Interpretation Evidence may include: Most of the towns have experienced population decline from 1996 to 2006. Most towns decreased in size. Most towns declined in population over the last 10 years. Population ranking of towns in terms of size stayed the same. Most towns increased or stayed the same over the last 5 years. Population in some towns fluctuated. Some have gone up and down – towns have fluctuated. Achievement Merit Excellence NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 4 of 11 Question Six (a) (b) Evidence Multi-line Graphing See Appendix C. Requirements: Title must include years and / or areas Vertical scale must be even. Axes labelled correctly must include $ / hectares. Key completed Four individual lines plotted Impacts may include: Based on the Waimakariri and Ashburton prices, North Otago farmers can expect both dry land and irrigated properties to rise in value. Irrigated properties will become more expensive than nonirrigated properties. Achievement THREE requirements. Explains ONE impact the irrigation scheme may have on land prices in the Waitaki District. All land values may increase. Non-irrigated land may increase in value. Irrigated land may increase in value. Non-irrigated land may decrease initially as less demand for nonirrigated and more demand for irrigated. Properties already irrigated may drop in value as there would be more irrigated land on the market. Non-irrigated land will be cheaper than irrigated land. Merit Excellence FOUR requirements, including accuracy of most of the individual line graphs. All FIVE requirements, including accuracy of the individual line graphs. Must draw line graphs. Must draw line graphs. See Evidence column. See Evidence column. Explains TWO impacts the irrigation scheme may have on land prices in the Waitaki District. OR ONE in detail. eg Irrigated land is much more valuable than dry land. If a North Otago farmer irrigated his or her land, it would have a higher sale price than if it was not irrigated. NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 5 of 11 Question Seven Evidence Statistical Interpretation Reasons for choice may include: Option 1: Choose not to change: does not like change. cannot be bothered with all the work involved in conversion. is not a risk-taker. no initial costs which would put you into debt. Option 2: Chooses to irrigate with intensive sheep breeding / finishing: can still use knowledge and skills from dry land sheep farming can make more money than dry land farming has no knowledge of dairy farming does not want the high costs of converting to dairying and carrying more debt. Wouldn’t have to worry about droughts Option 3: Chooses to irrigate with dairying: Even though conversion involves more costs, it also enables more profits to be made Not afraid of trying new farming type. Sees it as a challenge. Wouldn’t have to worry about droughts. Achievement Provides ONE valid reason. eg A dairy farm produces more income. Merit EITHER Provides TWO valid reasons at an Achievement level OR Provides ONE reason in depth. Data and / or detailed explanation eg Farmers will be able to utilise the skills and abilities that they have gathered from dry land sheep farming. They will not have to change what they have been doing, just do it more intensively. eg Option 2 brings in a surplus of $103 685 by comparison to $36 545, so the income triples. Excellence Provides TWO reasons in depth. eg See Merit column. NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 6 of 11 Question Eight Evidence Valuing Skills Examples could include: Positive economic: There will be extra jobs created on farms in the area and in the town of Oamaru. Farms will earn more income / revenue. Positive social: There will be more young people in the area with the growth of employment opportunities. This will cause high school rolls to grow and broaden subject choice for students. Negative social: Workers who come into the area do not stay long and do not contribute anything to the local community. Achievement Gives THREE brief examples of arguments. Candidates may not use their own words but may take sections from the resource. eg Positive economic: This will create more jobs on farms. “Farm revenues will rise by $35 million to $90 million a year.” Excellence EITHER Gives THREE examples using own words and data or detailed explanation. (depth). eg This will create 86–128 extra jobs on farms in the area and in the town of Oamaru. EITHER Gives FOUR examples using own words (depth and breadth). See Evidence column. OR Gives FOUR brief examples taking sections from the resources (breadth). More income for the area. Positive social: More school subjects. Negative cultural: The Ngai Tahu Iwi will be offended as they are opposed to it as they see the scheme will take water from the Waitaki River and put some of it into the Waiareka Creek. The Waitaki is sacred to the Maori, and they do not believe water should be taken from it at all. Merit Young people return to the area. Negative social: “Farm workers come and go and feel nothing for the area.” Negative cultural: Removing water from the river, which is sacred, offends local Maori. See Achievement column. OR Gives THREE in depth with detail and uses own words. NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 7 of 11 Question Nine Evidence Geographic Idea Applies Geographic Idea. Must cover the past and the present / future to demonstrate change is occurring / will occur as a result of the irrigation scheme. Evidence may include: Droughts have occurred in North Otago at least once every 10 years. The last one was in 1998– 99, but now the effects will be much reduced, with irrigation supplying water to maintain grass and crop growth even if it does not rain. The Waiareka Creek normally runs low on water in summer but now will have 1000 cumecs more water, which will improve the habitat for aquatic life. More intensive land use may result in runoff entering the Waiareka Creek and polluting the waterway with nitrates. More intensive land use will mean higher stock numbers, especially of dairy cows that will compact the soil, reducing the air spaces in the soil. Dry land farms carry less stock and usually sheep, which do not do as much damage to the soil. Population growth may replace population stagnation or decline, which has been a feature since 1996. Fewer young people will leave the area and more will move in for job opportunities on farms and in Oamaru. The age structure of the population will change with more Achievement Merit Excellence Applies Geographic Idea by describing TWO changes. Applies Geographic Idea by describing ONE change in depth. AND ONE at the Achievement Level. Applies Geographic Idea by describing TWO OR MORE changes in depth. Gives a general item of supporting evidence. Gives specific supporting evidence. Gives specific supporting evidence for ALL the changes. For example: Since the 1990s, the population of Oamaru has hardly changed. With more jobs being created, more people will come into the area and the population may grow. For example: See Evidence column. For example: See Evidence column. OR Describes THREE changes. Gives general items of supporting evidence for EACH. See Achievement column. NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 8 of 11 people in the younger age groups of under 15 and 15–65. This will be because of the job opportunities created by irrigation. Primary and secondary schools in the area, such as Waitaki Girls High School, will grow, and this will be good for students because they will have more subject choice available. The farming landscape will change from one characterised by sheep, trees, and little grass to one full of dairy cows, lots of grass, and irrigation equipment spraying water onto paddocks. New businesses such as irrigation equipment suppliers will open up to service the irrigated farms, and existing ones such as PGG Wrightson will expand. Judgement Statement Achievement Achievement with Merit Achievement with Excellence Minimum of: Minimum of: Minimum of: eight A’s, M’s or E’s eleven A’s, M’s or E’s twelve A’s, M’s or E’s OR including at least four M’s and two E’s ten A’s, M’s or E’s including at least four M’s or E’s NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 9 of 11 Appendix A NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 10 of 11 Appendix B: Age Structure of Selected New Zealand Places NCEA Level 2 Geography (90334) 2008 — page 11 of 11 Appendix C The Value of Irrigated and Dry Land 2000–2003 In the Waimakariri and Ashburton Districts