SFTF HE SubGroup Report final

advertisement
Sprague Field Task Force
Health and Environmental Sub-Group
REPORT OF THE HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUB-GROUP
The attached Bibliography contains the many studies and reports that have been
reviewed by the Sub-Group. From these reports it is clear that tire crumb rubber
in-fill contains certain organic compounds and metals that can be hazardous to a
person's health or the environment. These include, among others, polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), benzene,
phthalates, phenols, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), nitrosamines, latex,
zinc and lead. Some of these chemicals are known to be carcinogenic.
Some of these studies or reports conclude that exposure to crumb rubber does
not create an elevated health risk. Other studies suggest that the health risk is of
greater concern. These studies use various methodologies and laboratory tests.
None of the members of the Sub-Group are qualified to critique the methods and
tests to confirm or disagree with the studies.
Some recent studies have criticized the existing studies and reports, suggest that
the health risk is of greater concern, and state that further testing and studies are
needed and that the existing studies are not sufficient to be a public health safety
evaluation. As a result, these studies conclude that tire crumb rubber in-fill should
not be used for new synthetic fields.
There is no study or report equivalent to a CDC health impact assessment
concerning tire crumb rubber in-fill.
Below is a discussion of some of the most significant organic compounds and
metals contained in tire crumb rubber infill and the environmental effects of
synthetic turf based on various studies listed in the Bibliography.
I.
Health
1. PAHs: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of over 100
different chemicals that are formed during the incomplete burning of coal,
oil and gas, garbage, or other organic substances like tobacco or
charbroiled meat. PAHs are usually found as a mixture containing two or
more of these compounds, such as soot.
Some PAHs are manufactured. These pure PAHs usually exist as
colorless, white, or pale yellow-green solids. PAHs are found in coal tar,
crude oil, creosote, and roofing tar, but a few are used in medicines or to
make dyes, plastics, and pesticides.
They may be absorbed by humans through inhalation, ingestion or dermal
contact. PAHs have been identified as substances that may cause cancer
in humans.
PAHs may be released from rubber infill into the air and water. PAHs may
be absorbed by humans through inhalation, ingestion or dermal contact.
The release of PAHs has been studied via leaching, release into the air in
indoor pitches, dermal contact and ingestion. In these scenarios, the
exposure to PAHs has variously been found to be insignificant, and judged
not to contribute to an elevated health risk and/or not to cause an
increased risk of cancer. No academic or governmental outdoor air
studies are available but some recent testing of outdoor fields in Long
Island by a private firm revealed no significant PAHs.
2. Benzene: Benzene is a type of aromatic hydrocarbon and VOC. It is
used as a solvent. It has been identified as a carcinogen, particularly
regarding leukemia. Benzene may be absorbed by humans through
inhalation, ingestion or dermal contact. Indoor air quality and other
studies have concluded that the release of benzene will not cause an
increased risk of cancer. No outdoor air studies are available.
3. Phthalates, Alkyphenols and Oxyphenols: Phthalates are typically used
as a plasticizer. Alkyphenols and Oxyphenols are used as surfactants or
plasticizers or antioxidants. Their release has been studied in water
leachate and air in indoor pitches. They have been identified as endocrine
disruptors, and may affect the nervous system, liver, kidneys, blood
forming organs, genetic material and reproductive organs, and may affect
allergies and cancer. Studies have shown no acute health effects from
dermal contact, inhalation or ingestion. Studies have suggested long-term
effects are no cause for concern. Studies indicate that release of these
substances is negligible and tolerable and will not cause increased or
elevated health risks. No outdoor air studies are available.
4. VOCs: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are emitted as gases from
certain solids or liquids. VOCs include a variety of chemicals, some of
which may have short- and long-term adverse health effects. Laboratory
and indoor studies show health effects are insignificant. They may cause
odors or mucous membrane irritation which is reversible. No outdoor air
studies are available.
5. Zinc and other Metals: Leaching studies show elevated levels of Zinc in
surface run-off waters adjacent to pitches. The amount of leaching will be
greater or less depending on factors such as temperature, rainfall, acidity,
age, wear, etc. For instance investigation shows that zinc will leach from
the tire rubber at very high levels when the pH is low (very acidic).
Leaching studies indicate that releases of Zinc may exceed environmental
limits but that any effects are localized. Zinc, decays rapidly to background
levels as the run-off migrates beyond the trench around the playing field.
Measurements of Zinc in leaching studies are generally below the accepted
US standard of the EPA’s National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations
standard of 5 mg/L.
Too much Zinc can cause health problems, such as stomach cramps, skin
irritations, vomiting, nausea and anemia. Very high levels of Zinc can
damage the pancreas and disturb the protein metabolism, and cause
arteriosclerosis. Extensive exposure to Zinc chloride can cause respiratory
disorders.
Zinc can be a danger to unborn and newborn children. When mothers have
absorbed large concentrations of Zinc their children may be exposed to it
through blood or milk.
Some fish can accumulate Zinc in their bodies when they live in Zinccontaminated waterways. When Zinc enters the bodies of these fish it is
able to biomagnify up the food chain.
Large quantities of Zinc can accumulate in soils. When the soils of
farmland are polluted with Zinc, animals will absorb concentrations that are
damaging to their health.
Water-soluble Zinc that is located in soils can contaminate groundwater. It
can be a threat to plant species. Plants may have a Zinc uptake that their
systems cannot handle, due to the accumulation of Zinc in soils. On Zincrich soils only a limited number of plants have a chance of survival. That is
why there is not much plant diversity near Zinc-disposing factories. Due to
the effects upon plants Zinc is a serious threat to the productions of
farmlands.
Finally, Zinc can interrupt the activity in soils, as it negatively influences the
activity of microorganisms and earthworms. The breakdown of organic
matter may seriously slow down because of this.
Studies do not indicate any appreciable concern for other metals.
6. Nitrosamines: These amines are potent animal carcinogens, and may be
close to aflatoxin in risk. There are also other health effects besides the
cancer risk and they could include the target organs of the liver, kidney,
lungs, skin and eyes. Individual substances may vary on symptoms such
as but not limited to headache, fever, weakness, stomach upsets,
enlargement of the liver and jaundice. These have been detected in air
quality studies. There potential effect on health is questionable.
7. PCBs: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are associated with cancer and
effects on the immune system, reproductive system, nervous system and
hormonal system. Some have dioxin-like effects. They may be absorbed
through air, water or dermal contact. They are harmful if they accumulate
in the body. Studies involving artificial turf have concluded that PCBs
have no observed health effect and they do not constitute an elevated
health risk.
8. Allergies/Asthma: The risk of exposure to rubber infill dust and its
component parts, such as latex, as a cause of allergies and asthma
cannot be eliminated. Studies indicate that it is not possible to assess the
risk of allergies and asthma regarding exposure to phthalates from rubber
infill.
9. Contact Dermatitis: The development of contact dermatitis, principally
involving latex exposure, is not expected and is judged to involve an
insignificant health risk.
II.
Environment
a.
Air Pollution
1.
Artificial turf using rubber infill has not been identified as a major
source of air pollution. The only available studies involve indoor
pitches. The health effects of those studies are discussed above.
No academic or governmental outdoor air studies are available but
some recent testing of outdoor fields in Long Island by a private
firm revealed no significant PAHs.
b.
Water Pollution
1.
Zinc: Leachate studies show elevated levels of Zinc in surface runoff waters adjacent to pitches. Leaching is expected to occur over
many years, but any effects are localized. Measurements of Zinc
are generally below the accepted US standard of the EPA’s
National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations standard of 5
mg/L. Studies do not indicate any appreciable concern for other
metals.
2.
PAHs: The release of PAHs has been studied via leaching.
Leaching of PAHs exceeded the “no environmental impact
threshold.” Leaching is expected to occur over many years, but
any effects are localized.
3.
Alkyphenols and Oxyphenols: Leaching of Alkyphenols and
Oxyphenols exceeded the “no environmental impact threshold.”
Leaching is expected to occur over many years, but any effects are
localized.
c.
Global Warming
1.
Artificial turf pitches have been reported to produce significantly
higher surface temperatures than grass fields. However, their
impact on global warming has not been sufficiently studied such
that a realistic evaluation of their effect on global warming can be
given. Stuart Gaffin, an atmospheric scientist whose focus is
excess heat in urban areas and storm-water runoff, has said
synthetic turf poses problems on both scores. Last summer, as
part of a study of heat radiation in New York City, Gaffin found the
temperature above artificial turf fields measured at 140 to 160
degrees Fahrenheit, creating what he described as "heat islands."
Gaffin, with the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia
University in New York City, wrote in an e-mail to Globe West that
the "surfaces are among the hottest possible for urban areas,
rivaling dark roofs and fresh asphalt."
In addition, the tree planting offset requirements to achieve a 10year carbon neutral synthetic turf installation is estimated to be
1861 trees (+/- 23%).
III.
Conclusions:
After a thorough literature review and careful consideration of articles from known
sources with no or limited bias for or against synthetic turf, this Sub-Group has
drawn the following conclusions.
The options before us are to use well-maintained grass fields or consider a
limited number of synthetic turf fields that we consider safe.
Our conclusions:

Most synthetic turf fields on the market contain loose crumb rubber infill,
the most popular of which is from recycled automobile and truck tires. It is
well-documented that tires and loose crumb rubber infill contain a wide
variety of chemicals and metals that can be dangerous to human health
and the environment. However, there is significant debate about whether
these chemicals and metals are released into the environment at
dangerous levels.

The major health and environmental concerns associated with synthetic
turf fields are derived from the use of loose crumb rubber infill. Other field
materials, such as synthetic grass blades, backing and pad, have not
been reported as being a health or environmental risk. There are products
on the market that do not use infill or which use a type of infill not made
from crumb tire; such fields may conceivably minimize the risk to the
environment and the health of our community. These types of fields have
not been studied or reviewed.

This Sub-Group unanimously agrees that should the SFTF choose to
recommend installation of artificial turf fields at the Sprague Field, the
safest synthetic turf field for use in Wellesley from a health and
environmental perspective is one that does not use loose crumb rubber
infill. Products that do not utilize loose crumb rubber infill or products
utilizing alternatives to loose crumb rubber infill should be aggressively
explored to minimize risk to the health of field users and the environment.
Respectfully submitted:
Tom Brown
Richard Morse
Curt Smith
Mike Urban
December 5, 2007; includes edits made at SFTF meeting on this date.
Bibliography
1. Danish Ministry of the Environment - Study: Emissions and Evaluation of
Health Effects of PAH's and Aromatic Amines from Tyres by N.H. Nilsson,
A. Feilberg, and K. Pommer, Danish Technological Institute
2. INTRON – Dutch Alliance Report: Environmental and Health Risks of
Rubber Infill, R. van Selst
3. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR), Toxic
Substances FAQ's: ToxFAQ's for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAH's) from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
4. ASTDR - Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (This
is a 487-page document that discusses known exposures to PAH's)
Sections 5, Potential for Human Exposure; Toxicological Profile for
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Section 7, Regulations and
Advisories; Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons;
Appendix A User's Guide
5. Rubber Granulates for the Purpose of Infilling Artificial Turf, R. Wiebold,
Eximlink LTD, Austria
6. Environmental Risk Assessment of Artificial Turf Systems by T. Kallqvist,
Performed by Norwegian Institute for Water Research Client: Norwegian
Pollution Control Authority
7. Measurement of Air Pollution in Indoor Artificial Turf Halls by C. Dye, et al.
Performed by Norwegian Institute for Air Research Client: Norwegian
Pollution Control Authority
8. Artificial Turf Pitches - An Assessment of the Health Risks for Football
Players by Norwegian Institute of Public Health and the Radium
Hospital
9. Potential Health and Environmental Effects Linked to Artificial Turf
Systems- Final Report by Norwegian Building Research Institute Client:
Norwegian Football Association
10. Ambient Air Pollution by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: European
Union Position Paper
11. Ambient Air Pollution by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Annexes to
European Union Position Paper
12. Cancer Risks Assessment, Indicators, and Guidelines for Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Ambient Air by C. Bostrom, et al.
Environmental Health Perspectives, volume 110, supplement 3, June
2002
13. DIN Standard for Environmental Compatibility of Sports Grounds, Part 7:
Synthetic Turf - (This is the standard used by most Soccer Regulating
Bodies for establishing national standards for synthetic turf)
14. Regulation of harmful substances: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(PAHs) Published by TUV in Germany
15. Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament on General Product
safety
16. Scrap Tire Clean-up Guide - US EPA
17. Five Year Study of the Water Quality Effects of Tire Shreds Placed Above
the Water Table by D.N. Humphrey, University of Maine - Department of
Environmental Engineering
18. Field Study of Water Quality Effects of Tire Shreds Placed Below the
Water Table by D.N. Humphrey and L.E. Katz, Proceedings of
Conference on Beneficial Use of Recycled Materials
19. Toxicological Evaluation for the Hazard Assessment of Tire Crumb for Use
in Public Playgrounds by D. Birkholz et al., Journal of Air & Waste
Management Association 53:903-907
20. Response From Larson & Associates to Weston Conservation
Commission Regarding Environmental Questions Raised At ConCom
Hearing For Field #14 (3/23/07)
21. FIFA - Open Letter Concerning the Potential Cancer Risk from Certain
Granulate In-Fills from Artificial Turf (7/12/06)
22. Microtox Screen - Nautilus Environmental, LLC (2/6/06) North Creek
Analytical, Bothell, WA
23. New Penn State Study Debunks Staph Bacteria Scare In Synthetic
Turf (8/30/06) - Penn State College of Agriculture Sciences
24. Evaluation of Playing Surface Characteristic of Various In-Filled Systems
– Penn State University
25. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Report Evaluation of Health Effects of Recycled Waste Tires In Playground and
Track Products (1/07)
26. Topdressing with Crumb Rubber from Used Tires on Athletic Fields and
Other High Traffic Turf Areas - Dr. J. N. Rogers, III and J.T. Vanni,
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University
27. LRCCP Report - Use of End-Of-Life Tyre Rubber Crumb in Sports Floors:
2006 Update (5/15/06)
28. Grass-like Turf Provides Benefits Difficult to Obtain with Natural Grass
(Field Turf Tarkett 2007)
29. Weston Recreation Master Plan Steering Committee FAQ (supplement for
League of Women Voters)
30. Additional Educational Package Questions (Sportexe)
31. Sportexe Center for Research and Development FAQ (Sportexe)
32. List of Oldest Synthetic Turf Fields (Larson & Associates)
33. Kings County, Washington (10/18/0S Press Release)
34. Synthetic Spreading Beyond Sports Fields (5/3/07 Athletic Turf)
35. Artificial Turf Plan Tripped Up By Five Votes (4/15/07 Boston Globe)
36. Easton’s “Green” Debate a Turf War (4/6/07 Enterprise News)
37. Public Improvements and Private Desires - Editorial (11/05 Wayland
News)
38. CPA Dough for Fake Turf? (11/19/06 Middlesex Daily News)
39. Setting The Environment Record Straight on Synthetic Sports Fields
(3/3/07 CNW Telbec)
40. Study Finds Toxins in Turf Fields, Urges Time-Out (4/12/07 Westport, CT
News)
41. Hazardous Chemicals in Synthetic Turf: Follow-Up Analyses (4/12/07
Rachel’s Democracy & Health News
42. Magic Carpet: Newest Synthetic Turf Surfaces Aren’t Perfect, But They're
Smoother, Safer Ride (10/16/05 Boston Globe)
43. A New Turf War: Synthetic Turf in New York City Parks, New Yorkers for
Parks, Special Report, A Policy Paper, Spring 2006
44. Lincoln-Sudbury Thoughts on Artificial Turf , prepared by The Advisory
Committee and Todd Himstead
45. Rubber – Its Implications to Environmental Health, Brian G. Willoughby
46. Athletic Field Surfaces in the Pacific Northwest: A Comparison of
Synthetic and Natural Grass Fields, Submitted by Kristen Bush, MPH,
ASpYRe Commissioner & Executive Director of Northwest Parks
Foundation.
47. Independent Testing, Studies and Reports on the Subject of SBR and Any
Potential Health and Environmental Impact
48. Fact sheet and Technical Support Document on Artificial Turf, CT
Department of Public Health
49. Turf Battle Groups Say Fields Pose Health Risks, 8/8/07 Lowell Sun,
Jennifer Amy Myers
50. Town Willing to Look at Alternative Infill's for Turf Fields, 8/27/07 Frank
Lounge, Westport (CT) News
51. AG Pledges Funding for More Testing in Artificial Turf Debate, 8/30/07 the
day.com, Amy Rennczkowski
52. State DEP ‘Standing By’ for Clear Look at Turf Fields, 8/17/07, Westport
(CT) News, Frank Luongo
53. Environment and Human Health, Inc.’s Responses to the CT. Department
of Public Health’s FACT Sheet and Technical Support Document on
Artificial Turf, EHHI
54. Exposure to Recycled Tire Rubber Crumbs Used On Synthetic Turf Fields,
Playground and as Gardening Mulch, EHHI, David Brown
55. Study of Incidence of Recycled Rubber from Tyres
in Environment and Human Health, Paper provided by the Institute of
Biomechanics IBV, Valencia, Spain,
56. Study of Incidence of Recycled Rubber from Tyres in Environment and
Human Health, An Assessment of Health Risks, Presentation by Dr.
Christine Björge, Norway National Institute of Public Health
57. An Assessment of Health Risks, An Assessment of Health Risks, Study of
the National Institute of Public Health, Norway
58. An Assessment of Health Risks, Environmental Risk Assessment of
Artificial Turf Systems, Study of the Norwegian Institute for Water
Research, 2005
59. Environmental Risk Assessment of Artificial Turf Systems, Potential
Health and Environmental Effects Linked to Artificial Turf Systems, Study
of the Norwegian Building Research Institute NBI 2004
60. Potential Health and Environmental Effects Linked to Artificial Turf
Systems, Measurement of Air Pollution in Indoor Artificial
Turf Halls, Study of the Norwegian Institute for Air Research, 2006
61. Measurement of Air Pollution in Indoor Artificial Turf Halls, Environmental
and Health Study - SBR Rubber Granules, Nicole Salzmann, ISA, The
Netherlands
62. Environmental and Health Study – SBR Rubber Granules, Italian Study
Programme, Roberto Verna, President Committee Artificial Turf, Italian
Ministry of Health
63. Rubber - Its Implications to Environment and Health, Dr. Bryan
Willoughby, Rubber Consultant, UK
64. Environmental Compatibility Concept of DIN 18035-7, Dr. Lutz Zabel,
Fresenius Institute, Germany
65. Study Programme of Environmental Effects of Sports
Surfaces in Switzerland, Hans J. Kolitzus, IST, Switzerland
66. Environmental Compatibility Concept of OISS Austrian Institute of School
and Sports Facilities, Walter Müller, OFI, Austria
67. Zinc, MSDS Report – Material Safety Data Sheet for Zinc at:
http://cheville.okstate.edu/photonicslab/Safety/safety/MSDS/zinc_msds.ht
m
68. Zinc – Fact Sheet, Illinois Department of Public Health
69. Ambient Air Sampling for PAHs, Comsewogue High School Football Field,
J.C. Broderick & Associates, Inc., October 17, 2007
70. Ambient Air Sampling for PAHs, Schreiber High School Football Field,
J.C. Broderick & Associates, Inc., October 17, 2007
71. Synthetic Turf From a Chemical Perspective - A Status Report, Swedish
Chemical Inspectorate (KemI), July 2006
72. Estimating the Required Global Warming Offsets to Achieve a Carbon
Neutral Synthetic Field Turf System Installation, Jamie Meli and Lindita
Bushi, Athena Institute, Ontario, Canada 2007
73. For Schools, Artificial Turf Grows in Popularity, J. Bar, Washinton Post,
September 27, 2007
74. Which Grass is Greener? Comparing Natural and Artificial Turf
Feature, Jessica Boehland, Environmental Building News April 2004
75. Synthetic Turf – Facts, KEML
76. On Playing Fields, Grass is an Endangered Species, NY Times, August
13, 2007
77. Turf Wars: Debate continues on safety of fake grass, By David Brown,
TheDay.com, September 16, 2007
78. Turf Wars, By Wiliam Crain, The New York Times, Nytimes.com, N.Y.
Region/Opinions, September 16, 2007
79. Beckhams’s Lament: The Pains & Strains of Playing on Infilled Turf, by
Guive Mirfendereski, PhD, JD, Newton, Mass. , September 17, 2007
80. RAMP (Rochesterians Against the Misuse of Pesticides), Synthetic Turf
Chemicals, October 2007, reported on the website of the Institute of
Health and the Environment of the State University of New York at Albany
as an emerging environmental issue (“Possible Health Effects of Synthetic
Turf” http://www.albany.edu/ihe/emerging.htm) at
http://www.albany.edu/ihe/SyntheticTurfChemicalsdar.htm.
81. RAMP, Synthetic Turf Chemicals, 2007
82. Critics Worry About Artificial Turf's Impact On Ecosystem, The Record,
Colleen Diskin, November 23, 2007
83. Fact Sheet – Artificial/Synthetic Turf, Delaware Riverkeeper
Download