TRIM 49566 National Recommendations for User-applied Labelling of Injectable Medicines, Fluids and Lines Issues Register © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights for purposes other than those indicated above requires the written permission of the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, GPO Box 5480 Sydney NSW 2001 or mail@safetyandquality.gov.au Suggested citation Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care 2012, National Recommendations for User-applied Labelling of Injectable Medicines, Fluids and Lines: Issues Register, ACSQHC, Sydney. Acknowledgment Many individuals and organisations have freely given their time and expertise to support the development of this document. In particular, ACSQHC wishes to acknowledge State and Territory contacts that have coordinated implementation, and health services which have fed back implementation experiences and which have been the basis of this document. The involvement and willingness of all concerned to share their experience and expertise is greatly appreciated. This paper is available on the ACSQHC web site at www.safetyandquality.gov.au Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 2 National Recommendations for User-applied Labelling of Injectable Medicines, Fluids and Lines: Issues Register Table of contents Section Page 1 Introduction 3 2. Issues considered by HSMEAG 4 3. Details of registered issues 6 IR 1, IR 2 7 IR 3, IR4 8 IR 5, IR 6 9 IR 7, IR 8 10 IR 9, IR10 11 IR11 12 IR 12, IR13 13 IR14, IR15, IR16, IR17 14 1. Introduction The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC) is responsible for maintaining the National Recommendations for User-applied Labelling of Medicines, Fluids and Lines (the Labelling Recommendations) and for identifying and reducing national barriers to implementation. The Labelling Recommendations Issues Register reports issues that: 1. Cannot be resolved by recourse to Labelling Recommendations, related implementation resources and outcomes from the piloting process which developed the Labelling Recommendations; and 2. Have been referred to ACSQHC’s advisory groups for consideration. Labelling Recommendations issues referred to ACSQHC’s advisory groups are recorded in the Labelling Recommendations Issues Register on the ACSQHC web site at http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/PriorityProgram06_UaLIMFL Frequently asked questions (FAQs) are issues which have been raised often during implementation of the Labelling Recommendations and which were answered with reference to the Labelling Recommendations and the accompanying explanatory notes, implementation guide or with outcomes from the Labelling Recommendations pilot. These are collated in the Labelling Recommendations Frequently Asked Questions which is available on the ACSQHC web site at http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/PriorityProgram06_UaLIMFL Implementation of the Labelling Recommendations is an evolving process. ACSQHC invites facilities encountering implementation issues which cannot be answered by the Labelling Recommendations and implementation resources (including the FAQs and Labelling Recommendations Issues Register) to contact their jurisdictional contact in the first instance and, for health services with no jurisdictional representative, ACSQHC at mail@safetyandquality.gov.au. Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 3 2. Issues summary Issue Suggested change Proponent Date Response Reasoning/Action IR 1 Should pre-populated medicine line labels follow AS/NZS 4375 colour coding? Medicine line labels to follow colour coding of AS/NZS 4375 All 05/2011 Yes There is no established standard for colour coding medicine labels outside of those described in AS/NZS 4375 and ISO 26825. IR 2 Do the Labelling Recommendations extend to all health services? Broaden direct communication of Labelling Recommendations All 05/2011 Yes Yes, any situation where injectable medicines and fluids require identification. IR 3 Do the Labelling Recommendations apply to ambulance services? No change 01/2011 Yes. Any situation requiring identification of medicines and fluids (removed from original container) and lines connected to the patient whether or not these are intended for administration. See Labelling Recommendations page 5, Point 2. IR 4 Do labels provided by suppliers of custom packs need to comply with the Labelling Recommendations? No change ACSQHC 04/ 2011 Yes Labels are currently provided in custom surgical procedure packs. Suppliers must ensure these now comply with the Labelling Recommendations. Suppliers have been contacted directly by ACSQHC. IR 5 Is use of ‘units’ on container labels ambiguous? Remove ‘units’ from container labels Tas 05/2011 No Units are included to prompt the user to complete this as part of the dose. Education will support the intention of this prompt. IR 6 Should container labels be developed for specific IV routes? Introduce a central venous container label. NSW 03/2011 No The differentiation of central and peripheral delivery is confirmed via the line label. IR 7 Should the Labelling Recommendations include an intra-arterial container label? Include an intra-arterial container label SA 09/2011 No Individual facilities may produce an intra-arterial container label using the template for other container labels and incorporating the wording ‘For Intra-ARTERIAL Use Only’ and PMS 1787 (Red). Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 4 IR 8 Can the labels be removed from stainless steel containers? Specifications of removable labels are established. All Various Yes Stainless steel and other reusable containers are used in a high proportion of health care facilities. Labels from 3 manufacturers have been tested on reusable hollowware used in the perioperative area. Labels from 2 manufacturers exposed to 3 frequently encountered fluids were removed with alcohol wipes and/or eucalyptus oil in most cases. IR 9 Are three patient identifiers required on container labels? Add third patient identifier ACSQHC 09/2011 Yes To comply with National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards, June 2011 IR 10 Should AS/NZS4375 be applied to identify medicines in containers in open practice areas? Use labels with medicine and concentration only (AS/NZS4375) in open practice areas such as emergency department and post anaesthetic recovery (PACU). All 09/2011 No In open practice areas identify medicines in containers with full labelling according to the Labelling Recommendations. In closed practice areas, identify medicines in containers with full labelling according to the Labelling Recommendations OR with medicine name and concentration only according to AS/NZS4375. IR 11 What specifications apply to pre-printed labels on the sterile field in the perioperative area? Provide size and content and colour for pre-printed labels in perioperative area All 07/2011 Under evaluation Pre-printed labels to identify medicines in containers on the sterile field are being evaluated for size, content and colour in a perioperative area. Colour coding on trial pre-printed labels follows AS/NZS 4375 and results will be available mid 2012. IR 12 Should syringes in syringe drivers and pumps carry abbreviated labelling? Label lines attached to syringes in pumps and drivers with full details and include only medicine name on syringe. SA 10/2011 No Full inclusions are required on the primary container. Attached lines and devices may not be relabelled at syringe change. IR 13 Does the application of a To be advised Vic 05/2011 No CME response. Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 5 syringe label affect the operation of a Niki T34 syringe driver? IR14 Can pre-printed container labels be used in cardiac catheter laboratories? In the closed practice environment of the cardiac catheter laboratory, labels can be pre-printed with medicine and concentration only. Colour coding to be applied according to AS/NZS4375. All IR15 Line labels to identify the neural route are all coloured yellow with different borders. Do the labels require further differentiation? There is further differentiation of epidural, intrathecal and regional routes with use of different colours. IR16 Can the medicine name be pre-printed on the same line route label? IR17 Do all lines require route identification when multiple lines are cited? Yes The cardiac catheter laboratory is a closed practice area where the identity of the patient and patient care team are beyond doubt and recorded. Medicines in containers may be identified with medicine name and concentration according to AS/NZS4375. Various No The differentiation of the intraneural routes in the Labelling Recommendations is appropriate. Intraneural route identification will be monitored. Create a line label with medicine name and route of administration. Manufacturer No No rationale for combination. Label each line for route and medicine when several dedicated continuous infusions are running. LRRG No Replication of route identification may detract from medicine identification. Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register Various 03/2012 6 3. Details of registered issues IR 1: Can medicine line labels be pre-printed? If so, can these labels be coloured? The Labelling Recommendations include a generic 'medicine' label to identify the active ingredient in a dedicated continuous infusion line. Pre-printed labels to identify the active ingredient are acceptable and may be more convenient in high-use areas. Line medicine labels can be printed ‘black on white’. However, facilities may prefer to use colour to support the written information in assisting recognition of medicines and fluids. There is no specific standard for this purpose. Colour coding according to drug class is adopted by Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS) 4375: 1996 User-applied labels on syringes containing drugs used during anaesthesia. In the absence of an established standard for colour coding medicine line labels, where it is standard practice to apply colour, any colour should comply with AS/NZS 4375. Labels for medicines in the miscellaneous category of AS/NZS 4375 (such as heparin, insulin and 0.9% sodium chloride) are should be printed black on white. The international Standard ISO 26825:2008 http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43811 draws heavily on Australian and New Zealand Standard ASNZ 4375:1996. ISO 26825:2008 specifies differentiation of heparin and protamine with a solid black border for heparin and a black and white hatched border for protamine. In pilot testing, AS/NZS 4375 labels manufactured for use in anaesthesia were found to be too small and adhered poorly to lines. Ideally, use medicine labels produced specifically for the purpose of line identification. However, if the smaller anaesthetic labels are used, ensure any labels that detach are replaced immediately. The font used on the medicine line labels may use Tall Man lettering. The extension of standard AS/NZS4375:1996 to labelling dedicated continuous infusion lines is an interim position. ACSQHC will continue to work with users and the Labelling Recommendations Reference Group to establish the validity of the extension, including testing of the extension in intensive care units. IR 2: Do the Labelling Recommendations extend to all health services? Yes, any situation where injectable medicines and fluids require identification. The following organisations received detailed information on the Labelling Recommendations. • Australian Dental Association; • The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists; • Australian College of Operating Room Nurses; • Australian College of Critical Care Nurses; • The Aged Care Standards & Accreditation Agency Ltd.; • Cardiac Electrophysiology Institute of Australasia • Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand • Paramedics Australasia • Australian Institute of Radiography Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 7 IR 3: Do emergency situations referred to in the Labelling Recommendations (page 8) apply to ambulance services and do these services need to implement the Labelling Recommendations? Results from the pilot test in the emergency department and other clinical areas likely to perform emergency resuscitation procedures indicate that identification of medicines and safe administration is important in the emergency situation. Principles from the Labelling Recommendations should be followed if staff are available in sufficient numbers to label syringes without compromising speed of drug delivery in an emergency. This is reflected in the Labelling Recommendations as follows: Label medicines in an emergency. See pages 8 and 9: “Where injectable medicines are drawn up in a syringe for immediate emergency use (e.g. during resuscitation), standard operating procedures in emergency care should ensure that the principles in the Labelling Recommendations are followed to the extent possible. Pre-printed active ingredient (generic medicine) labels from AS/NZS 4375 should be considered.” Note exemptions to labelling: When a single person draws up and immediately administers a medicine without the syringe leaving the hand; and Fluid bags for infusion where NO additional injectable medicines are added prior to administration e.g. IV fluids (e.g. 0.9% Sodium Chloride, 5% glucose), pre-mixed solutions (e.g. potassium, heparin infusion bags). Use of pre-printed active ingredient labels, consistent with AS/NZ 4375, may be suitable for the ambulance service. However, these are not suitable if the patient identity needs to be recorded. IR 4: Do suppliers of custom procedure packs need to supply medicine labels compliant with the Labelling Recommendations in these packs? Yes, suppliers of custom procedure packs should ensure labels included in the packs to identify route of administration and medicines used on the sterile field, e.g. operating rooms and catheter labs, comply with the Labelling Recommendations. The following suppliers have received correspondence relating to the Labelling Recommendations from ACSQHC: • Medline • B. Braun Australia Pty Ltd • ICU Medical Australia Pty Ltd • Proact Medical Systems • REM System Pty Ltd • Mayo Healthcare Pty Ltd • Bard Australia Pty Ltd • Covidien Pty Ltd • Kimberley-Clark Health Care • Medical Specialties Australia If you represent a supplier of custom packs not listed above, and require further information on the Labelling Recommendations, please contact mail@safetyandquality.gov.au In all clinical areas, medicines taken from their original container must be identified in the new container (syringe, bag etc.) with the following information: Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 8 Patient name (given name and family name); Patient identifier (ID), e.g. URN, MRN; Active ingredient/s (medicine/s) added to the bag or syringe; Amount of medicine/s added (including units); Volume of fluid (mL) - total in bag or syringe; Concentration (units/mL); Diluent (for syringes); Date and time prepared; Prepared by (signature); Checked by (signature); and Route of administration (where not specified by wording and colour). However, if the patient and user identifications are beyond doubt and recorded elsewhere, they are not required on the label and the abbreviated container label from the Labelling Recommendations is an appropriate choice. Any pre-populated labels based on the abbreviated container label should be coloured in compliance with AS/NZS 4375 (colour code according to drug class). IR 5: Use of the word 'units' on container labels. Concerns have been raised that use of the word 'units’ for amount on container labels may be interpreted as ‘units as in insulin/ heparin' rather than the amount of medicine. The issue has not occurred in clinical practice. Units are included to prompt the user to include units when writing the dose. Health services are advised to monitor the situation through incident management system audit during implementation. IR 6: Should container labels for specific intravenous routes be introduced, e.g. peripheral venous, central venous, PICC etc.? Container labels for the IV route are to remain as per the Labelling Recommendations and not tailored for specific IV routes. Results of the pilot testing informed the final recommendations and two overriding factors were reported: Keep the number of different type and size labels to a minimum to facilitate a clear selection process; and Bag labels with a predominantly white background and a small colour border are not sufficiently visible to draw attention to the presence of an additive. Therefore, a single, fully coloured container label for intravenous bags with additives and syringes is included in the Labelling Recommendations for containers of medicines for either peripheral or central intravenous administration. The differentiation between the peripheral and central administration is confirmed through the line label and a separate line label for central venous use is available. It is acknowledged that clear differentiation between peripheral intravenous and central intravenous line labels with the same colour is required. Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 9 IR 7: Is an Intra-arterial container label required for the Labelling Recommendations? Container labels for the intra-arterial route will not be drawn up and included in the Labelling Recommendations. However, an intra-arterial container label for medicines administered via the intra-arterial route, e.g. heparin, may occasionally be required. Administration of medicines through the intra-arterial line was considered during development of the Labelling Recommendations. In most instances the intra-arterial line will be used for monitoring purposes only. Indeed, during pilot testing the intra-arterial line was only used as a monitoring line and there was no demand for a container label. Moreover, if a container label was introduced there may be a false implication that medicines are intended for routine administration via the intra-arterial line. Health services requiring an intra-arterial container label should develop this consistent with the Labelling Recommendation principles. To identify a container holding a medicine to be delivered via the intra- arterial route a red (PMS 1787) label with wording 'For IntraARTERIAL Use Only’. At all times it is essential to label the intra-arterial line to identify the route of the line. IR 8: Use of disposable vs. stainless steel containers on the sterile field Labels may be difficult to remove from stainless steel and other reusable hollow ware used in operating rooms. This would render containers unsuitable for reuse. Jurisdictions advise ACSQHC that stainless steel and other reusable containers are used in preference to disposable containers in a high proportion of health facilities in Australia. Thus, it is a requirement that labels may be removed entirely after use. The Labelling Recommendations specify ‘peel off’ labels are used for container labels on the perioperative sterile field. ACSQHC engaged a health facility to evaluate sterile labels and adherence to reusable containers used in the perioperative area to establish the viability of container reissue. ACSQHC acknowledge the valuable contribution made by those involved at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney. The evaluation looked specifically at the performance of labels from 3 suppliers to establish the potential for these labels to be removed from reusable plastic or stainless steel containers after exposure to 3 fluids frequently used in the perioperative sterile field. Whilst the ease of removal of labels was the key focus, the adherence of the label for periods intended to reflect practice, was also established. Results indicate that labels from 2 of the three manufacturers could be removed either with or without application of alcohol wipes and/or eucalyptus oil. The following limitations are noted: a) only 3 fluids were tested and labels appeared to perform differently with exposure to different fluids b) fluids were tested by adding a 'wipe' of fluid not by making the label very wet or immersing the label for any time. Identification of medicines in containers on the sterile field is mandatory. Therefore, the ability to remove ‘peel off’ labels from reusable containers used on the perioperative sterile field supports the continued use of reusable containers. Further details of the evaluation are available on request from mail@safetyandquality.gov.au Note: Pre-labelling disposable containers with medicine name is a source of medication error and the user should apply appropriate labels at the time the container is filled. Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 10 IR 9: Are three patient identifiers required on container labels? The National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards, June 2011, (Standard 5: Patient Identification and Procedure Matching) state ‘At least three approved patient identifiers are used when providing care, therapy or services’. To comply with the standards, the container labels in the Labelling Recommendations will be changed to include a third patient identifier, date of birth to be described as DOB (see Figure 1 below). Figure 1: Revised container label with patient date of birth. The intravenous route container label is example shown The revision is valid immediately, but may take effect as existing label stocks are exhausted. The revised container labels are available in print ready form on the ACSQHC web site at http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/internet/safety/publishing.nsf/Content/PriorityProgram06_UaLIMFL IR 10: Should AS/NZS 4375 or the Labelling Recommendations be applied to identify medicines in containers in open practice areas? Containers (bags and syringes) holding medicines removed from their original containers must be identified with full label inclusions, as per the container label in the Labelling Recommendations, in all open practice environments. The following elements are the minimum requirement: Patient name (first name and family name); Patient identifier (ID), e.g. URN, MRN; Active ingredient/s (medicine/s) added to the bag or syringe; Amount of medicine/s added (including units); Volume of fluid (mL) - total in bag or syringe; Concentration (units/mL); Diluent (complete for syringes); Date and time prepared; Prepared by (signature); Checked by (signature); and Route of administration (where not specified by wording and colour). The exception to this rule is the closed practice environment where the following applies The identity of the patient is beyond doubt The identities of the patient care team are recorded The medicine is administered completely within the closed practice environment. Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 11 Examples of closed practice environments include the operating room, endoscopy, cardiac catheter lab, radiology suites. AS/NZS 4375:1996 standard describes labels colour coded according to drug class preprinted with medicine name and a prompt for concentration and applies to syringes containing drugs used during anaesthesia. AS/NZS 4375:1996 labels, used for the purpose for which they are designed, identify medicines drawn up and administered by the same practitioner. It is appropriate to extend compliance with AS/NZS4375:1996 to identify medicine name and concentration to closed practice environments beyond anaesthesia. At the end of a procedure in a closed practice environment all medicines prepared for use in the closed practice environment, including partially used or unused medicines, are to be discarded promptly. Medicines prepared in the closed practice environment which will move with the patient to an open area must comply with the Labelling Recommendations. Examples include continued delivery of additives in fluid bags on patient transfer from the operating room to post anaesthetic recovery unit (PACU) or syringes prepared to accompany the patient on transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Closed practice environments include, but are not limited to, the endoscopy room, cardiac catheter laboratories, radiology and the operating room. The emergency department (ED) is an open practice environment and labelling must comply with the Labelling Recommendations and which states Where injectable medicines are drawn up in a syringe for immediate emergency use (e.g. during resuscitation), standard operating procedures in emergency care should ensure that the principles in the Labelling Recommendations are followed to the extent possible. Pre-printed active ingredient (generic medicine) labels from AS/NZS 4375 should be considered. IR 11: Are there specifications for pre-printed labels on the sterile field in the perioperative area? The operating room of the perioperative area is a closed practice environment. The Labelling Recommendations provide an abbreviated container label as a generic label to identify all medicines and fluids on the sterile field in the perioperative area. Patient and user identifications are omitted as these details are recorded elsewhere. Pilot testing acknowledged pre-printed labels for use by scrub nurses and surgeons in the perioperative sterile field have advantages and are a suitable alternative to the abbreviated container label for routine operations where the same medicines are used frequently. Most operating rooms will be able to identify a short list of medicines used regularly and preprint labels with the following advantages: No need for sterile marker Readily available Less time to select and apply Preprinted sterile container labels can be printed ‘black on white’. However, facilities may prefer to use colour to support the written word in assisting recognition of medicines and fluids. There is no specific standard for this purpose. Colour coding according to drug class is adopted by AS/NZS 4375: 1996 User-applied labels on syringes containing drugs used during anaesthesia. In the absence of an established standard for colour coding labels for the perioperative sterile field, ACSQHC suggest colour should comply with AS/NZS 4375:1996. Labels for medicines in the miscellaneous category of AS/NZS 4375 (such as heparin, insulin and 0.9% sodium chloride) are should be printed black on white. The international Standard ISO 26825:2008 http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43811 Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 12 draws heavily on Australian and New Zealand Standard ASNZ 4375:1996. ISO 26825:2008 specifies differentiation of heparin and protamine with a solid black border for heparin and a black and white hatched border for protamine. Label quality must be such that labels are fit for purpose, progress through sterilisation intact and retain integrity throughout the procedure. ACSQHC have engaged Calvary Wakefield Hospital, South Australia to test sets of sterile perioperative labels, to prepare a label sheet including medicines most frequently used in routine procedures, to procure individually packaged sterile sheets and to evaluate their use in terms of identification and label quality. The trial of procured labels is expected to undergo evaluation in June 2012. The evaluation will assist other facilities across health services to implement the Labelling Recommendations to safely identify medicines on the sterile field in the perioperative area. IR 12: Should syringes in syringe drivers and pumps carry abbreviated labelling? Containers (syringes) in syringe drivers and pumps should be identified with full label inclusions Patient name (first name and family name); Patient identifier (ID), e.g. URN, MRN; Active ingredient/s (medicine/s) added to the bag or syringe; Amount of medicine/s added (including units); Volume of fluid (mL) - total in bag or syringe; Concentration (units/mL); Diluent (complete for syringes); Date and time prepared; Prepared by (signature); Checked by (signature); and Route of administration (where not specified by wording and colour). It is appreciated the small container label is often too large to allow syringe graduations to remain visible when using a syringe driver or pump. Facilities may consider changes to label placement provided the full, completed container label remains directly attached to the primary container, i.e. syringe. IR 13: Does the application of a syringe label effect the operation of a Niki T34 syringe driver? Experience suggests the application of labels to syringes in Niki T34 syringe drivers does not interfere with the ability of the device to accurately assess syringe volume. Caesarea Medical Electronics (CME) advise: ‘The pump identifies syringes by their diameter. Most labels if applied carefully do not make a significant difference to the diameter and mostly the pump will still identify the syringe correctly. If the label is not flat and smooth the pump may initially guess the wrong syringe. I.e. it will see a larger diameter. At all times the user must check that the correct syringe is displayed before activating the pump. If the incorrect syringe is displayed initially the user must use the UP/DOWN button to select the correct syringe and then they can proceed.’ Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 13 IR 14: Can pre-printed container labels be used in cardiac catheter laboratories? In the closed practice environment of the cardiac catheter laboratory, where the identity of the patient and patient care team are beyond doubt and recorded, labels can be pre-printed with medicine and concentration only. In cardiac catheter laboratories, the same sets of medicines are used following set protocols for the same procedures. This allows for predictable label sets to be produced, including specification of the concentration. Fluids not for injection can be labelled with name only. For example, concentration is not required for Betadine, chlorhexidine. Where colour coding is applied as standard, pre-printed sterile container labels should follow colour coding according to drug class as adopted by AS/NZS 4375: 1996 User-applied labels on syringes containing drugs used during anaesthesia. In the absence of an established standard for colour coding labels for the cardiac catheter sterile field, ACSQHC suggest colour should comply with AS/NZS 4375:1996. Labels for medicines in the miscellaneous category of AS/NZS 4375 (such as heparin, insulin and 0.9% sodium chloride) are should be printed black on white. The international Standard ISO 26825:2008 http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43811 draws heavily on Australian and New Zealand Standard ASNZ 4375:1996. ISO 26825:2008 specifies differentiation of heparin and protamine with a solid black border for heparin and a black and white hatched border for protamine. Label quality must be such that labels are fit for purpose, progress through sterilisation intact and retain integrity throughout the procedure. The extension of standard AS/NZS4375:1996 to labelling in cardiac catheter and angiography suites is an interim position. ACSQHC will continue to work with users and the Labelling Recommendations Reference Group to establish the validity of the extension, including testing in this clinical area. IR 15: Line labels to identify the neural route are all coloured yellow with different borders. Do the labels require further differentiation? Labelling lines to identify the route is a mandatory requirement of the Labelling Recommendations and the current differentiation of the intraneural routes is appropriate. Intraneural route identification will continue to be monitored. IR 16: Can the medicine name be pre-printed on the same line route label? Currently, there is no evidence to support identification of drug delivery via the neural route by including the medicine on the route identification line label. The route identification label remains separate to the medicine (active ingredient) line label. Combination of the two labels is not endorsed. IR 17: Do all lines require route identification when multiple lines are present? When a number of lines are in situ in intensive care settings, it is critical to ensure the drug in each line can be promptly identified. Equally the route is important, particularly with intrathecal and intra-arterial routes. For intravenous infusion, where multiple central lines converge into a common central line, the common line must be identified for route, but the individual lines do not require separate route labels. The individual lines will each be identified for active ingredient. Last updated 10 April 2012 Labelling Recommendations: Issues Register 14