PRINCIPLE 4 – You could try this Students are challenged and supported to develop deep levels of thinking and application. VELS: the thinking domain has three dimensions. (Source: http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/essential/interdisciplinary/thinking/index.html) DIMENSION EXPLANATION Reasoning, processing and inquiring This dimension encompasses the knowledge, skills and behaviours required to enable students to inquire into the world around them, and to use critical thinking to analyse and evaluate information they encounter. Students learn to question and assemble information and develop opinions based on informed judgments. They also develop the capacity to transform information into coherent knowledge structures. Creativity The capacity to think creatively is a central component of being able to problem-solve and be innovative. In this dimension students learn to seek innovative alternatives and apply their imagination to the generation of possibilities. They learn to take risks with their thinking and make new connections. Reflection, evaluation and Metacognition Learning is enhanced when individuals develop the capacity to reflect on, and refine their existing ideas and beliefs. In this dimension students learn to reflect on what they know and develop awareness that there is more to know. They learn to question the perspectives of themselves and others. They evaluate the validity of their own and others’ ideas. They also develop their metacognitive skills in planning, monitoring and evaluating their own thinking processes and strategies. RELEVANCE TO MY LESSON An explicit focus on thinking and the teaching of thinking skills aims to develop students’ thinking to a qualitatively higher level. Students need to be supported to move beyond the lower-order cognitive skills of recall and comprehension to the development of higher-order processes required for creative problem solving, decision making and conceptualising. In addition, they need to develop the capacity for metacognition - the capacity to reflect on and manage their own thinking. This can only happen if the school and classroom culture values and promotes thinking and if students are provided with sufficient time to think, reflect, and engage in sustained discussion, deliberation and inquiry. Students need challenging tasks which stimulate, encourage and support skilful and effective thinking. (Source: http://vels.vcaa.vic.edu.au/essential/interdisciplinary/thinking/index.html) The Principles of Teaching and Learning P–12 PRINCIPLE 4 – You could try this Students are challenged and supported to develop deep levels of thinking and application. Strategies and tactics: Questioning A full range of resources and professional learning workshops, hundreds of examples and practice can be found out at: http://www.ltag.education.tas.gov.au/effectteach/pedagogy/questioning.htm Look for: Jamie McKenzie “Questioning strategies: Cultivating the talents of all students” The relationship of thinking to questioning Thinking as wondering Critical evaluation of sources Questioning techniques – Scamper, Questioning Toolkit, the Great Questions Press, the Technology of Questioning, Questioning Practice examples Jamie McKenzie is editor of the online journals – From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal http://fno.org/ The Question Mark http://questioning.org/ No Child Left http://nochildleft.com/ Books: Learning to Question to Wonder to Learn (2005); Just in Time Technology: Doing Better with Fewer (2002); Planning Good Change with Technology and Literacy (2001); Beyond Technology: Questioning, Research and the Information Literate School (2000); How Teachers Learn Technology Best (1999) FNO Press http://store.yahoo.com/fnopress/ Gifted Education Professional Development Package: Department of Education Science and Training, 2005 http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/Gifted_Education_Professional_Development_ Package.htm Resources for affective and creative questions, reflective and metacognitive questions, thinking curriculum and frameworks inquiry learning. Developed for ‘gifted education’ these resources are valuable for any teacher working with a range of student needs. Coverage of Bloom’s Taxonomy 1956 (revised Anderson & Krathwohl 2001), Creative and divergent thinking is supported by frameworks such as Williams 1993, Problem Based Learning, Kaplan model. “The modules contain an overview of current research about particular areas of gifted education. This research, in plain language, is illustrated by cartoons, case studies and examples of how it can be applied in the mainstream classroom. The modules cover all levels of schooling: early childhood (the initial years of schooling), Primary (later years of primary schools), and secondary (secondary school). The modules are also ordered according to whether a teacher is in a rural or urban school, teaching in the classroom or involved in school administration, or whether the teacher is working alone or undertaking professional development in a small group or whole school situation. Coloured Icons throughout the modules allow quick identification of research, case studies, information and activities according to individual needs.” The display of all professional development modules is found at: http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_resources/profiles/Gifted_Education_Professional_Development_ Package.htm#abstract The Principles of Teaching and Learning P–12