International standards training module iwpr.net What we mean by standards… First we mean the standards of quality -- the ethical and professional standards by which we work Second we can mean the standards as in the aspects of our work -what is common and typical about the articles produced We will deal with the first issue in this hour Class questions to start Are international standards really possible? Is there really a "normal" journalism? Why did you become a journalist? What is journalism? Does each region and each country have it's own brand of journalism? 1 International standards training module iwpr.net Class questions 1. Note how many cultures/countries represented. 2. Have participants name the ethical standards journalists recognise locally. 3. Name recent success stories and failure stories related to ethics in journalism locally. Are there systemic problems? Various attempts to codify journalistic ethics: lots of differences but it's often a difference in stresses (differences in degree not kind) warnings consistency against incitement and discrimination feature high in the Press Code for Bosnian Journalists impartiality and accuracy are the top items in the BBC Producers' Guidelines The Japan Newspaper Publishers and Editors Association's Canon of Journalism pledges newspapers to "continued effort toward an affluent and peaceful future" The Association of Journalists of Kyrgyzstan have a rather nice start to their Code of Ethics: "The journalist's duty is to serve the truth. The role of mass media is to look for the truth." 2 International standards training module iwpr.net Underlying similarities Certainly every code agrees on what is wrong: libel/slander (defamation) plagiarism malicious misrepresentation accepting bribes Thus we have general agreement on what unethical journalism is… …but, somewhat surprisingly, we also have quite a bit of agreement on what proper journalism should be… 3 key points of agreement… 1/3: Every code highlights "impartiality" or "independence" different stresses on commercial impartiality “Outsider” exercise: political impartiality impartiality in the face of special interest groups At the next coffee break or lunch break, ask participants to make observations in the streets and public areas of their town, noting two or three things that the non-native would find unique or particular to the region or town where you are. But ALWAYS there seems to be general agreement among the CoEs everywhere that the journalist should be somehow SEPARATE from the story being covered John Simpson (BBC World Affairs Editor and with the BBC since 1966) points out that a journalist is "always an outsider" The observations should be simple things one can see and hear in public. This is a test of observation skills and the ability to see one’s surroundings afresh – as an outsider. After the break, discuss these observations. Are some of these observations useful for adding colour to stories? 3 International standards training module iwpr.net Impartiality at least seems to be a universally accepted ideal but Impartiality is never 100% o a journalist STRIVES FOR THE IDEAL of independence o a journalist is always working against forces in society to maintain independence -----------------EXECRICSE: Spectrum of independence: 1: Draw the spectrum, explaining the two poles 2: Class question: what are the forces in society that might try to influence or affect the journalist’s work (draw in arrows below spectrum) 4 International standards training module iwpr.net 2/3: Every code stresses "accuracy" The urge to "get it right" is always strong But it's more than this: facts need to be weighted properly. This is essentially subjective, but some sense of balance is the goal. Often this is not just an ethical question; it has legal ramifications as well (libel, esp. in UK law) Some would put "fairness to sources" here too, as being accurate means quoting accurately and fully (in meaning if not in actual word), leading to our next point… 5 International standards training module iwpr.net 3/3: Nearly every code stresses "fairness" in some form Fairness to interviewees The BBC's Producers' Guidelines say interviewees have a right to know: what the programme will be about, what kind of contribution they are expected to make whether an interview will be live or recorded whether it will be edited it also says an interviewer can be sceptical and searching but not discourteous Fairness in obtaining information the IFJ CoE says: "The journalist shall only use fair methods to obtain news, photographs and documents." But how are "fair methods" distinguished from unfair methods? eg, the paparazzi: can they ever be justified? "fairness" as a concept seems quite culture-dependent (what one group will see as fair, another will see as unfair) still, the concept of "fairness" does cross cultures in that: we understand journalists to wield a certain power in society we understand that abuse of that power is ethically wrong 6 International standards training module iwpr.net Protection of sources many codes of ethics emphasise the journalist's obligation to protect his or her sources this is not a right recognised by every country's legal system o in fact, it is the exception, not the rule o In the US and Australia, journalists are occasionally thrown in jail for short periods over this the Council of Europe's Convention on Human Rights doesn't specifically mention this, but a decision by the CoE Committee of Ministers Deputies recommends member states recognise the right of journalists not to disclose their sources of information when applying Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights on freedom of expression. At IWPR, we certainly consider it a journalist's right, but it's hard to make the case that it is an international standard 7 International standards training module iwpr.net Conclusion: So, is there an "international journalism"? Surprisingly, yes. Many different codes for many different countries, but each mention the same key features, 1. impartiality 2. accuracy 3. fairness Differences are in stress, not in ideals Discussion: Living up to the ideals This is all very nice, but it's a bit theoretical. Still, these are questions we deal with every day, even if we don't recognise them openly as such. Examples from the floor? 8 International standards training module iwpr.net Useful links: Press Code for Bosnian Journalists http://www.ijnet.org/3a5b556063815.html BBC Producers' Guidelines http://www.bbc.co.uk/info/editorial/prodgl/index.shtml Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's handbook: Journalistic Standards and Practices (Canada, 1993) http://cbc.radio-canada.ca/htmen/5_2.htm Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct Radio-Television News Directors Association (USA, 2000) http://www.rtnda.org/ethics/coe.shtml International Federation of Journalists' Code of Ethics http://www.ijnet.org/5131.html Various individual countries' codes of ethics for journalists: http://www.ijnet.org/code.html Council of Europe's Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/WhatYouWant.asp?NT=005 decision in 2000 pertaining to protection of sources: http://press.coe.int/cp/2000/172a(2000).htm 9