Module IV, Section C Horticulture Crops in the agro-ecosystem Projected Outcomes Background / Lessons o Introduction o The Ground Beneath Our Feet o Ecological question 1: What are the nutrient and water flows in the system? o Ecological question 2: What are the sources and sinks of pollutants in the system? o Ecological question 3: What are the interactions of living organisms in the system? o Ecological question 4: What are the energy flows in the system? Activities Projected outcomes: 1. Students will begin to apply ecological analysis to vegetable and fruit production systems. 2. Students will learn about some key agro-ecological management practices, including soil and fertility management, crop rotation, and pest management. 3. Students will gain an appreciation of the complexity and variety of the agroecology of horticultural crops. Background / Lessons Introduction Like natural ecosystems, agro-ecosystems are characterized by nutrient flows and cycles, energy flows, and the interactions of living organisms with each other and the physical environment. However, agro-ecosystems differ from natural ecosystems in two key ways: First, we expect them to export particular biological goods for our use. Second, we deliberately manipulate them to get them to produce those goods in abundance. These two special qualities of agro-ecosystems in turn affect their key ecological processes. Sustainable agriculture seeks to take advantage of ecosystem processes by designing an agricultural system that works with them rather than against them to achieve its production goals. This section begins with a quick look at the role of the soil in the agro-ecosystem and then encourages students to think about the ecology of horticultural production by posing four ecological questions. 1) 2) 3) 4) What are the nutrient and water flows in the system? What are the sources and sinks of pollutants in the system? What are the interactions of living organisms in the system? What are the energy flows in the system? Horticultural crops vary widely in their ecological characteristics, from row-cropped annual vegetables to fruit trees that may be productive for more than 30 years. Moreover, while some fruit and vegetable farms specialize in producing one or two crops, others produce dozens of different kinds of plants. This unit will provide some indication of the variety of sustainable horticultural systems in Iowa and Wisconsin, but it cannot cover it all. Classes are encouraged to apply the four agro-ecological questions to crops grown in their areas. The Ground Beneath Our Feet "The nation that destroys its soil, destroys itself." - Franklin Delano Roosevelt Essentially, all life depends upon the soil .... There can be no life without soil and no soil without life; they have evolved together." - Charles E. Kellogg, USDA Yearbook of Agriculture, 1938 See http://soils.usda.gov/education/resources/k_12/quotes/ for more soils quotes Every farmer knows that soils are important. But different farmers (and scientists) think about soils in different ways. One way to look at soils is as a physical medium. It needs to serve a variety of mechanical functions: provide a substrate for plant roots to grow in, allow water to drain so plant roots have access to oxygen, but hold on to enough water that roots have access to water. The soil is also where plant nutrients are stored, transferred to roots, and sometimes lost. Many sustainable farmers think about soils as a living system. They value the mechanical functions of soil, but they look beyond those properties to biological and ecological services. These farmers seek to build and maintain good soil health, rather than simply avoiding damaging the physical structure of the soil. Activity 1: Trial by Water Our understanding of soil biology is still quite rudimentary, but we are learning more and more about how the multitude of living organisms in the soil affect soil quality and processes and about how our actions in turn affect the life of the soil. Key groups of soil organisms include: Bacteria (single-celled organisms that are neither plants nor animals) Fungi (neither plants nor animals, typically grow in long chains of cells called hyphae) Protozoa (single-celled animals such as amoebae) Nematodes (tiny non-segmented worms) Arthropods (invertebrates such as insects, spiders, millipedes, etc.) Earthworms (Plant roots) Each of these groups contains a wide variety of species, and the different species do very different things. For example, one gram of soil may contain 11,000 different species of bacteria. Some bacteria help decompose organic matter, some fix nitrogen, some prey on living organisms causing disease, and a few bacteria photosynthesize. Together, soil organisms perform critical ecological functions such as decomposing organic matter, changing soil structure, moving, stabilizing, and transforming nutrients, altering chemicals such as pesticides, and eating or helping each other. Soil ecology introduction powerpoint As you look at the four ecological questions below, keep the role of the soil and of soil organisms in mind. What are the nutrient and water flows in the system? Several factors influence the nutrient and water flows in horticultural production. All plants require nutrients to grow. Because they take nutrients away from a site when they harvest crops, farmers have to replace those nutrients to keep that land productive. However, different crops have different nutrient needs. For example, spinach and sweet corn require lots of nitrogen to yield well, while beans, peas, and many fruits do well with little added nitrogen but may have special water or micronutrient requirements. The growth habit of the crops is also important. A “crop” such as turfgrass, with year-round ground-cover, requires different nutrient and water management than for example tomatoes, which only grow in summer and are generally surrounded by bare soil or possibly a non-living mulch. Even within a crop type, different management approaches can have significant impacts on nutrient and water flows. Let’s take a look at nutrient and water impacts of two crops: sweet corn and cranberries. Sweet corn Nothing symbolizes the taste of summer quite like fresh sweet corn. Customers seek out the varieties they like – super-sweet “Sugar Buns” or elegant white “Silver Queen.” But most don’t think beyond appearance and flavor to how the corn was raised. Sweet corn grows best with lots of sunshine, enough but not too much water, and lots of nutrients in the soil, especially nitrogen. Because corn responds well to high fertility, it can be tempting to add generous amounts of fertilizer. But excess nitrogen can leach into groundwater, and phosphorus can run off into surface water, damaging aquatic communities and drinking water supplies. (See http://ohioline.osu.edu/aexfact/0463.html or http://extension.missouri.edu/explore/envqual/wq0252.htm for a summary of the N cycle in agronomic systems.) In addition, money spent on unneeded fertilizer cuts into farm profits. Farmers can use a variety of practices to reduce the need for purchased fertilizer in sweet corn production: Recognize that sweet corn needs less N than grain corn, because it is harvested earlier. N recommendations for grain corn on similar soils can be reduced by ?? percent without affecting sweet corn yields???? Use realistic yield goals when calculating nutrient needs. Supply N through crop rotation. If the corn follows a good stand of alfalfa or clover, it will need no supplemental nitrogen. If it follows soybeans, potatoes, or a small grain, N applications can usually be reduced by about 30 to 40 lbs per acre. Crop rotation also benefits sweet corn by reducing a number of key pests. Use a late spring soil nitrate test to measure available nitrogen already in the soil, rather than assuming the crop will need all its nitrogen supplied by fertilizer applications. (See “Nitrogen Fertilizer Recommendations for Corn in Iowa,” p. 2 http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1714.pdf , “Using the Late Spring Nitrate Test to Reduce Nitrate Loss Within a Watershed” http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publications.htm?SEQ_NO_115=149 625, “The Presidedress Soil Nitrate Test” http://ipcm.wisc.edu/pubs/pdf/PSNT.pdf, and “Nitrogen $ Rate of Return Calculator” http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/NComparison.htm . Remember to adjust grain corn recommendations downwards for sweet corn.) Side-dress N applications while the crop is growing and can use the nutrients right away, rather than relying on fall or pre-plant applications. Fall N applications are likely to leach significant amounts of N. Use composted (link to header below) manures to supply the phosphorus, potassium, and part of the nitrogen needs of the corn. Plant a cover crop such as winter wheat or rye after harvest to prevent runoff and leaching of nutrients. Use conservation tillage to minimize runoff and erosion . Cranberries Compared to most crops, cranberries require very little fertilizer, in part because as perennial plants they do not have to grow new stems every year and can store nutrients over the winter. The recommended rates are from 20 to 40 lbs of N and 20 to 45 lbs of P2O5 per acre per year. Compare these guidelines to recommended rates of 80 to 150 lbs/acre N and 0 to 100 lbs/acre P2O5 per year for sweet corn and 40 to 100 lbs/acre N for broccoli. Moreover, unlike most crops, cranberry yields decline quickly when too much nitrogen fertilizer is applied. So you might think that should make sustainable nutrient management for cranberries easy. But it is not so simple. The way cranberries grow provides some special challenges. Cranberry plants are very picky about what kinds of nutrients they will take up. Whereas most plants will take up nitrogen as ammonium and/or nitrate, cranberries only use ammonium. And while most food crops grow in nearly neutral mineral soils, cranberries grow in acid soils that are high in iron and aluminum. These special soil characteristics change the behavior of phosphorus in the soil. On top of that, cranberry bogs are regularly flooded to help with harvest and prevent frost damage and winter kill. This flooding means that nutrients that are not held in the plant are more likely to run off to surface waters (phosphorus) or leach to ground water (nitrogen). These features mean that many of the usual tools for sustainable nutrient management (use of manure, compost, legumes, and cover crops) don’t work for cranberry production. The main approach that most cranberry growers have for improving the sustainability of nutrient use is to fine tune the amount and timing of nutrients applied, using plant tissue testing to determine nutrient needs over the next 15 months, fertilizer selection to target P and N ratio and type to cranberry needs, careful monitoring of developmental stages and appearance of the plants to determine optimum timing for fertilizer application, and accurate fertilizer delivery equipment. These tools can help maximize the amount of fertilizer taken up by the plants and minimize loss to surface or ground water. (See http://www.hort.wisc.edu/cran/, and pages 24-25 of http://www.wiscran.org/WFPlanning/SamplePlan.pdf for more information on fine-tuning nutrients for cranberry production.) In recent years, with the growth of the organic market, some growers have started producing cranberries organically. Organic growers rely on compost teas and fish-based fertilizers to add nutrients. These materials do not provide the rapid release of plant available N that synthetic ammonium and urea do, and the difference in nitrogen availability is thought to be the main reason why organic cranberry yields are typically much lower than conventional yields (see http://www.cias.wisc.edu/pdf/orgcran.pdf.). Nevertheless, with good management and the price premium for organic products, organic production is proving viable for a number of growers. Research, breeding, and experimentation with organic management may improve yields considerably. Because irrigation and flooding are such important practices in commercial cranberry bogs, cranberry production also has special impacts on water cycling. Cranberry growers store water in natural and artificial wetlands. On average, in Wisconsin each acre of producing cranberry bog has about ten acres of support lands to store water. Cranberry growers point out that these support lands provide habitat for a variety of wetland plants and animals (http://www.wiscran.org/wetlands.htm) and that: … growers now use sophisticated systems to conserve and recycle the large amounts of water necessary for cranberry growing. All flooding and sprinkling involves “borrowing” water from within the same system—it is just temporarily moved from one area to another. Because cranberry vines and berries absorb little water and the soil is saturated enough that little water goes into the groundwater, the water is returned to its original location, unchanged. The government considers cranberry growers’ use of water to be predominantly “non-consumptive” because the water does not degrade in quality or quantity. (From “Wetlands & Cranberry Growing: Environmental Partners”by the Wisconsin State Cranberry Growers Association http://www.wiscran.org/crangrow.htm.) . Critics note that cranberry irrigation and water storage for harvest can exacerbate the impacts of drought on natural wetlands by withholding water that normally would contribute to stream recharge. They also worry that water that has cycled through a cranberry bog can pick up nutrients and pesticides that may then harm aquatic communities. Compost Compost is one of the most important nutrient management tools for sustainable fruit, vegetable, and flower growers. Composting is the controlled decomposition of biological materials. (See The Art and Science of Composting.) (link to http://www.cias.wisc.edu/archives/2002/03/01/the_art_and_science_of_composting/inde x.php) Compost offers several advantages: Nutrients tend to be stable and bound to organic matter, so they are less likely to run off or leach than nutrients in raw manure or synthetic fertilizers. Compost has a mild “earthy” odor, unlike the unpleasant odor of manure. Compost acts as a soil amendment as well as a nutrient source, adding organic matter and improving soil tilth. The composting process greatly reduces or eliminates pathogens that are harmful to human health. Many types of compost contain far fewer viable weed seeds than regular manure. Compost can help suppress certain plant diseases. Compost also offers some challenges: Up to half of the nitrogen contained in the material being composted is lost to the atmosphere during the composting process. However in many trials, plants gown with compost yield more than expected at low levels of soil N. Compost can be highly variable, depending on the materials composted and on the composting process. Growers need to be sure they are using the right type of compost for their needs. Compost is much bulkier and therefore harder to transport, store, and apply to large areas than synthetic fertilizers. Composting requires careful management, and depending on the composting system chosen, may require expensive equipment. Activity 2. Compost Recipes Activity 3. Vermicomposting What are the sources and sinks of pollutants in the system? A sustainable system will minimize the amount of pollutants introduced into the environment. What is a pollutant? It is a chemical that is damaging to human health or the environment. Just as a weed is a “plant out of place,” so whether something is a pollutant depends in part on context. For example, soil particles are a valuable resource in the crop field. However, if those same soil particles are carried from the field to a stream or river by erosion, they become sediment—a pollutant that can severely damage aquatic communities. Suggested activity: Resource or Pollutant Thus, the source of many agricultural pollutants is deliberate application of inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides. Another source is beneficial resources such as soil or manure, which turn into pollutants when mismanaged and displaced. A sink is where the pollutant winds up. Surface waters, including rivers, lakes, and the ocean, are a common sink for agricultural pollutants. The broad categories of pollutants in horticultural crops include: excess nutrients running off or leaching to surface and ground waters soil erosion degrading wetlands pesticides harming non-target organisms Apples What are the pollution sources in apple production, and what sustainable practices can reduce pollution? The main pollution concern for apple growers is pesticides. Key apple pests in the Upper Midwest include plum curculio, codling moth, and apple maggot. Leafrollers, aphids, leafminers, leafhoppers, scale insects, and spider mites can also cause damage in apple orchards. And diseases such as fire blight, apple scab, and powdery mildew can destroy the crop or make it unmarketable. (See http://cecommerce.uwex.edu/pdfs/A2116.PDF, or http://cecommerce.uwex.edu/pdfs/A2179.PDF.) For decades, apple growers have used a wide array of pesticides to control these insects, diseases, and weeds. But since the 1970s scientists, farmers, and consumers have all become increasingly aware that pesticides can cause both environmental and human health problems. As a result, some apple growers are seeking ways to grow apples using fewer and less toxic pesticides. The array of techniques and tools farmers use to get a good crop with minimal use of pesticides is called Integrated Pest Management, or IPM. IPM powerpoint Activity 4: Economic threshold calculation Activity 5: Apple IPM video and discussion Fertilizer recommendations for tree fruits are low in comparison to most other agricultural crops, so runoff and leaching from nutrient applications are not generally considered to be problems of apple production in Wisconsin and Iowa. In addition, fruit quality can deteriorate when too much nitrogen is applied. Thus, most mature Midwestern orchards are not fertilized unless tissue testing indicates a nutrient deficiency. See http://www.canr.msu.edu/vanburen/e-852.htm#part3, http://cecommerce.uwex.edu/pdfs/A3565.PDF, or http://www.spectrumanalytic.com/support/library/pdf/fertilizing_apple_trees.pdf for information on nutrient recommendations for apple production. Including legumes such as clover in the cover crop for the orchard floor can further reduce the need for nitrogen fertilizer. Soil erosion is a possible source of pollution from apple orchards. Apple trees yield better when they do not compete with other vegetation within two or three feet of the tree trunk. Most Wisconsin and Iowa orchards maintain 5 foot wide strips of bare ground in the tree rows and 6 to 10 foot wide strips of grass groundcover between tree rows. If the strips of groundcover are well maintained and planted along the contours, erosion can be minimized. Some sustainable growers use mulch to suppress competing plant growth in the tree row. Mulching reduces reliance on herbicides and the potential for soil erosion. Although mulch can potentially provide cover for rodents and other pests, a 6 year study of a cherry orchard in Michigan found that mulching increased yields over conventional orchard floor management. What are the interactions of living organisms in the system? Typically, sustainable agro-ecosystems will try to work with species interactions and will favor species and genetic diversity. Everything in an ecosystem affects other parts of the ecosystem. Typically, production agriculture has focused on the negative impacts of organisms other than the crop. In this worldview, all non-crop plants are seen as weeds that compete for water, nutrients, and sunlight, and all non-crop animals from insects to birds and mammals are seen as useless at best and crop-destroying pests or disease carriers at worst. There is some truth to this outlook. Weeds do compete with crop plants, and many types of animals eat parts of the crop and can cause substantial yield losses. Agro-ecosystems differ from natural ecosystems in that we require them to export a good portion of their production for off-site human consumption. So farmers cannot afford to give weeds, crop predators, and diseases a free hand. On the other hand, it turns out that many non-crop organisms benefit crop production in a variety of ways, such as by improving nutrient cycling and availability to the crop, pollinating the crop, eating crop pests, providing habitat for beneficial species, and reducing disease. Practices such as heavy use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and mono-cropping may harm beneficial organisms as much as or more than pests. The number of different species of plants, animals, and microorganisms in an ecosystem is referred to as species diversity. There is also a different kind of variation, which is the genetic diversity within a species or population (the individuals of one species in an ecosystem). Let’s take a look at both species diversity and genetic diversity in fresh market vegetable production. A popular model for sustainable vegetable production is the community supported agriculture operation or CSA. (http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1692.pdf). CSAs promote diversity by: Planting a wide variety of crops. Because they try to supply most of the vegetable needs for shareholders during the growing season, CSA farms grow a wide variety of vegetables, herbs, flowers, and fruits. Over the course of one year, a typical CSA farm will grow more than 30 different crops on less than 50 acres. The smallest CSAs have less than 5 acres in production (Growing Harmony Farm http://www.newfarm.org/features/0404/carrots/index.shtml , Nevada, Iowa) and even the largest CSAs in the Midwest (Angelic Organics http://www.angelicorganics.com/index.html , Caledonia, Illinois and Harmony Valley http://www.harmonyvalleyfarm.com/ , Viroqua, Wisconsin) have less than 100 acres in crops. Rotating crops. CSAs rotate crops to reduce disease and insect pressures. Planting cover crops to reduce erosion, reduce weed pressure, and manage nutrient cycling. Avoiding use of broad-spectrum pesticides that can harm non-target species. Deliberately encouraging beneficial organisms, from birds to insects, to help with pest control. Preserving and restoring natural habitats on the farm. Habitat preservation can help make the farm more attractive to CSA members, and it also fits with the values of most CSA farmers. Natural habitats usually contain far greater species diversity than crop fields. Planting numerous varieties of each crop, including open-pollinated and heirloom varieties. CSAs usually value genetic diversity for several reasons. First and most important, their customers value diversity and look for varieties that look interesting and offer special flavors. Second, using several different varieties can decrease the chance that a particular disease or pest will damage the whole crop. Third, different varieties can often be harvested at different times. And finally, like their customers, many growers take pleasure in the many different forms and flavors one species can provide. For example, in 2005 Harmony Valley CSA grew 16 varieties of tomatoes: 3 paste (a.k.a. Roma) tomatoes, 2 standard reds, 4 small cherry (a.k.a. grape), 2 gold, and 4 heirlooms out in the field, and Sungold cherry tomatoes. August 20 newsletter, p. 2 http://www.harmonyvalleyfarm.com/NLTR/csa050827.pdf Activity 6: Tasting Diversity Seed Savers http://www.seedsavers.org/Aboutus.asp Comparison of plant communities Pre-agricultural / “natural” Mix of perennial and annual species Variety of communities depending on soil type, climate and micro-climate, and site history (prairies, savannahs, wetlands, forests, etc) Large number of species at one site, typically little or no exposed soil year-round Substantial genetic variation within most species Conventional horticulture (vegetable production) Sequential mono-cultures (usually 2 or at most 3 species in rotation, sometimes only one species) Mainly annual row crops, with bare soil between the rows and completely bare soil exposed for 6 months of the year or more Little genetic variety within the species; often just one or two varieties grown of a crop and high value placed on consistency of size and appearance Sustainable horticulture in Wisconsin and Iowa Sequential mono-cultures (usually 3 to 6 species in rotation) Annual row crops rotated with perennials and small grains. Use of cover crops to minimize amount of bare soil exposed in winter Interest in increasing genetic variety, including reintroduction of heirloom varieties as well as breeding new varieties for diversity of flavor, appearance, and agronomic traits such as disease resistance. Restoration of complex natural or partly natural plant communities around crop fields What are the energy flows in the system? Sustainable agro-ecosystems rely more on solar energy rather than on fossil fuels. Sustainable systems minimize energy waste. It is difficult to get recent detailed information about energy use in modern agriculture, and most of the work that has been done on energy used in agricultural production looks at field crops and livestock production rather than horticultural farms. Most modern fruit and vegetable production relies on fossil fuels in a variety of ways, such as: Fuel and electricity to power equipment such as tractors Fertilizers and pesticides made from or with fossil fuels such as natural gas Fuel or electricity to heat greenhouses Plastic to cover hoophouses, act as mulch, and package produce Fuel to transport produce to market Electricity to keep produce cool Fuel and electricity to process produce Certain farming and food system practices can provide substantial savings in fossil energy use. Minimize use of nitrogen fertilizer and pesticides (see strategies recommended in the nutrient cycling and pollution prevention segments) Recycle nutrients and resources on the farm Minimize transportation costs by selling to and buying from local sources Use renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, or biomass-fueled power More than half of the energy in our food system is used not on the farm, but in transportation, processing, storage and packaging, and home cooking. Sustainable practices for the consumer Buy local foods, when possible Avoid excess packaging Use energy-efficient appliances and techniques when possible Use renewable energy sources, if possible (solar and wind power)