REPRODUCTION PAPER AND PRESENTATION Reproduction Research Paper - Each student will be required to research a topic related to breeding horses (mare care, shipping semen, foaling, foal diseases etc.) and present the information to class. 4/2 Presentation of Research 4/7 Presentation of Research 4/9 Presentation of Research 100 (50 – paper, 50-presentation) TOPIC The choice of topic will be due March 1st. The topic must encompass recent research in equine reproduction and may pertain to mares, stallions or foals. Suggestion – Go to www.ivis.org You can sign up for free or use user peggy@iastate.edu password isuhorse. Look under proceedings – 2007 or 2006 Annual Convention of American Equine Practitioners Havemeyer Foundation Workshops in Equine Veterinary Medicine Proceedings of the International Symposia on Equine Reproduction Paper Requirements LENGTH AND FORMAT 2-3 pages of double-spaced text are a good target. The title, author, course, and date should be typed onto a cover sheet. Illustrations are not required but are often useful in explaining graphical concepts and in giving the paper character. The bibliography should be the last section of the paper. Selected papers will be sent to Apple n’ Oats for publication and all will be published on the Equine Program web page. Papers should be submitted on WebCT for other students to grade. Papers will be due April 11th. CONTENT The introductory paragraph should leave me with a very clear idea of where the paper is headed. The best way to do this is to provide a thesis statement. Each paragraph should contribute a logical step toward discussion of your topic. In the body of paper, major points are discussed and supported by evidence from the scientific literature. Well structured so that the reader has a good sense of where the paper is heading. Well written so that the paper is pleasant to read. Nicely packaged, enhancing the content without wasting words. o Words are used efficiently; ideas are expressed clearly and concisely. o Main points are arranged in logical order; sentences are ordered effectively. o Transitional words or phrases are used to make abstract read smoothly from beginning to end. The conclusion of your paper should not merely summarize the paper. Rather, it should persuade the reader that you have discovered and discussed something important. REFERENCES – Should have a minimum of 3 o Use Journal of Animal Science referencing system http://jas.fass.org/misc/citations.shtml Electronic Publications FDA. 2001. Effect of the use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals on pathogen load: Systematic review of the published literature. Available: http://www.fda.gov/cvm/antimicrobial/PathRpt.PDF. Accessed Dec. 14, 2001. Conference Proceedings and Unpublished Presentations Barbano, D. M. 1996. Mozzarella cheese yield: Factors to consider. Page 29 in Proc. Wisconsin Cheese Makers Mtg., Ctr. Dairy Res., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison. Henderson, C. R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. Pages 10–41 in Proc. Anim. Breeding Genet. Symp. in Honor of Dr. J. L. Lush, Am. Soc. Anim. Sci., Am. Dairy Sci. Assoc., Champaign, IL Journal Articles Broderick, G. A., and J. H. Kang. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J. Dairy Sci. 63:64–75. Cleale, R. M., IV, R. A. Britton, T. J. Klopfenstein, M. L. Bauer, D. L. Harmon, and L. D. Satterlee. 1987a. Induced non-enzymatic browning of soybean meal. II. Ruminal escape and net portal absorption of soybean protein treated with xylose. J. Anim. Sci. 65:1319–1326. Books and Articles Within Edited Books AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chem., Arlington, VA. Church, D. C. 1991. Livestock Feeds and Feeding. 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. OVERALL COHESION Excellent work; I enjoyed the whole thing; I've learned something new, interesting, and useful; want to try to have it published on the web. Very good work; I enjoyed it and have learned something new; a few weaknesses, though; want to try to have it published on the web Good work; a solid effort and a pleasure to read; some weak parts; it could probably be published with some revisions before submission Adequate but it was occasionally hard to follow; you lost me a few times; I wasn't entirely convinced at times Barely adequate; I couldn't follow what you were saying much of the time; the idea was good but the presentation was very weak Poor work; this was really hard to follow; I couldn't keep track of what you were saying or you kept changing your mind about what you were writing about FORMAT & STYLE Papers should be double-spaced, typed or word processed, with 1" margins on white 8.5" by 11" paper. Recommended types are Palatino, Times, or Time Roman in 10 or 12 point size. No mono-spaced fonts, please (e.g., Courier, Monaco). Pages numbered sequentially. Correct punctuation Absences of spelling errors Correct grammar GRAPHICS & TABLES, CHARTS….FORMAT & STRUCTURE Graphs o Avoid using a background grid on your graph. o Ensure that all symbols on your graph are large enough to reproduce clearly. o Ensure that all lines and curves are thick enough to reproduce clearly. Tables o When possible, tables should be organized to fit across the page (similar to the text), so that the page can be read without turning it sideways. o Tables are numbered consecutively in Arabic numbers; each table begins on a separate page. o All parts of tables should be typed double-spaced Images o Ensure that your image has enough contrast to reproduce clearly. o If you created your image in color, be sure that the information you wish to convey can still be distinguished in grayscale mode. o Resolution should be at least 300 pixels per inch (ppi) for color or grayscale images. Resolution should be at least 600 ppi for monochrome images. o Images should be in JPEG. PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS Develop a power point presentation and present your information to the class. The time limit is 20 min and an additional 5 minutes for questions. Power Point Evaluation CATEGORY Power Point Originality 5 pts 4 – 3 pts 2 pts 1 pts Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way. Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page. Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate. Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read. Background does not detract from text or other graphics. The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. Sequencing of Information Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card. Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place. Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place. There is no clear plan for the organization of information. Use of Graphics All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation. A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation. All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation. Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation. Background & Text - Font Choice & Formatting Content - Accuracy Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. Score Presentation Preparedness Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. Student seems pretty prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. The student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. Student does not seem at all prepared to present. Comprehension Student is able to accurately answer almost all questions posed by students & attendees about the topic. Student is able to accurately answer most questions posed by classmates & attendees about the topic. Student is able to accurately answer a few questions posed by classmates & attendees about the topic. Student is unable to accurately answer questions posed by classmates & attendees about the topic. Speaks Clearly Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, and mispronounces no words. Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members throughout the presentation. Speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-95%) the time, but mispronounces one word. Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 90% of the time. Often mumbles or can not be understood OR mispronounces more than one word. Volume often too soft to be heard by all audience members. Vocabulary Uses vocabulary appropriate for the audience. Extends audience vocabulary by defining words that might be new to most of the audience. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the audience. Includes 1-2 words that might be new to most of the audience, but does not define them. Speaks clearly and distinctly most (9485%) of the time. Mispronounces no more than one word. Volume is loud enough to be heard by all audience members at least 80% of the time. Uses vocabulary appropriate for the audience. Does not include any vocabulary that might be new to the audience. Posture and Eye Contact Stands up straight, looks relaxed and confident. Establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation. Stands up straight and establishes eye contact with everyone in the room during the presentation. Sometimes stands up straight and establishes eye contact. Slouches and/or does not look at people during the presentation. Uses several (5 or more) words or phrases that are not understood by the audience.