Process, In-Process, and Outcome Measures – Background for ToC http://www.google.com/#hl=en&q=process+measures&tbs=dfn:1&tbo=u&sa=X&ei=pswt TvH7HsbkiAK_qJGwAg&sqi=2&ved=0CBwQkQ4&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=8a58e935 55963d21&biw=1018&bih=422 downloaded July 25, 2011 Process Measures: Healthcare quality indicators related to the methods and procedures that a managed care organization and its providers use to furnish care.www.youreasyinsurance.com/glossaryPage.html downloaded July 25, 2011. Process measure can be isolated to a particular activity. That makes them much easier to use than outcomes measures. Using several well-selected process measures can help zero in on the goal. Outcomes measures: Results (of many processes) – measures of how close you are to attaining the goal of the effort. Or there may be a specific clinical measure such as Hemaglobin a1C, a clinical laboratory test used to monitor control or progression of diabetes. Additional Search Results: Comparative process definitions o Process measure: a measure which focuses on a process that leads to a certain outcome, meaning a scientific basis exists for believing that the process, when executed well, will increase the probability of achieving a desired outcome. ... www.scbch.org/links/glossary-of-medical-terms/ downloaded July 25, 2011 o Process Measure: A measure of a business process that demonstrates where value is being delivered to a stakeholder. www.processexecutive.com/blog/bpmguide/glossary/ downloaded July 25, 2011 Outcome Measures and Output Measures Illustrated http://curiouscat.com/management/outcomemeasures.cfm Outcome Measures description - a measure of the result of a system, relative to the aim. An outcome measure is used to measure the success of a system. For example, the outcome measure could be the percentage of people who do not get polio. An output measure, for example, would be the number of people vaccinated with the polio vaccine. Often management focuses on output measures which do not tell you about the success but rather are a measure of activity. Care should be taken to define good outcome measures to use in determining the success of programs and in determining the whether improvement projects result in improved outcomes. Examples of outcome measures: literacy rate, infant mortality rate, days without an accident on a job site, students finding a job they want (for a university), tomato yield from a tomato plant, on time arrival at destination, percentage of the population who can see (for a measure of the success of a program to eliminate preventable blindness). Related terms: Output Measures description - a measure of activity, for example, the number of cars produced by an assembly line, or the amount of money spent on education, or the number of phone call processed by a call center. Operational Definition Process Measure - measures of the performance of a process. Process measures can provide real time feedback that can be acted on quickly, when a process first provides data that something is amiss. Of course, care must be taken to avoid tampering. Activity Measure - a measure of the level of resources committed to a process. So as an example, the total amount of dollars spent to eliminate polio in the United States would represent an activity measure (how much money was committed to the activity). An in-process measure could be (looking at various regions of the country possibly) a measure what percentage of potential vaccinations that were wasted (spoiled, lost...). Another in-process measure example could be the cost per vaccination (say $30 million dollars for to run the whole program which results in 15 million vaccinations). From this example, an outcome measure could be the reduction of polio in the population (for example, .5% of the population was newly diagnosed with polio and in the first year and the next year it was .3% and then .1%...). An update on the polio example from a Worldwide perspective, the World Health Organization: "targeted the year 2000 to complete the polio eradication plan. This was not achieved due to vaccine shortages, wars, and logistical problems in Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Nevertheless, polio will be eliminated from 190 countries by the end of this year, and WHO is optimistic that it will achieve global eradication by the new target date of 2005." Posted 6/9/2000 on the Johns Hopkins Infectious Diseases web site. And a site dedicated to continuously updated statistics: polio eradication.org. In-process Measures: http://www.baldrige.com/criteria_informationmanagement/in-process-measures/ In-process measures track the performance of a process as it is unfolding, providing real-time feedback that can be acted upon without waiting for the process to end, at which point end-of-process or outcome measures tell you the results of that process. In a perfect world, in-process measures align with end-ofprocess measures. Most of the results in Category 7 of a Baldrige application are for end-of-process measures. The alignment allows an organization to predict how it will perform on those end-of-process measures and fix problems during the process to get better results. This type of measure has the intrinsic and explicit requirement that the process measures selected for monitoring be part of the same process that leads to the outcome. Measure Type Definition Illustration: http://www.health.state.mn.us/healthreform/baskets/measurement090609_definition.pdf Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome model is a useful framework for quality assessment and illustrates the link between process and outcome: “Before (quality) assessment can begin we must decide how quality is to be defined and that depends on whether one assesses only the performance of practitioners or also the contributions of patients and of the health care system. (To adequately assess quality of health care) we also need detailed information about the causal linkages among the structural attributes of the settings in which care occurs, the processes of care, and the outcomes of care.” (Donabedian, JAMA, Vol. 260 No. 12, September 23, 1988) Structural measures – measures of organizational characteristics (such as staffing ratios, number of hospital beds) Process measures – interactions between healthcare practitioner and patient; a series of actions, changes, or functions bringing about a result (such as mammography screening rate) Outcome – changes (desirable and undesirable) in individuals and populations that are attributed to healthcare. There are a variety of outcome measures and ways to label them, e.g. Those representing an end result (such as mortality or function) Intermediate outcomes (physiologic or biochemical values – like blood pressure or LDL value). These precede and may lead to longer-range end result outcomes. Proxies used to indicate an outcome – (such as hospital readmission indicates deterioration in health status since discharge). These can be the same as process measures. Type of Outcome Example Healthcare acquired adverse event - Surgical site infection Patient function - Performance of activities of daily living Mortality - ICU mortality Intermediate clinical outcome - Improvement in blood pressure/ Blood pressure under control Service utilization as proxy for pt outcome - Return to higher level of care (ICU) Morbidity related to disease control - Blindness related to diabetes Health related quality of life - Social role and mental capacity http://curiouscat.com/management/outcomemeasures.cfm Outcome Measures - a measure of the result of a system, relative to the aim. An outcome measure is used to measure the success of a system. For example, the outcome measure could be the percentage of people who do not get polio. Using the measure types: http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/content/13/6/475.full.pdf See the full article. http://management.curiouscatblog.net/2008/07/14/outcome-and-process-measures/ You should have all these types of measures but outcome measures are most likely to be missing so special care should be taken to make sure you are using them. It is important to define good outcome measures to use in determining the success of systems, and in determining the whether improvement projects actually result in improved outcomes. In-process measures can be valuable in providing actionable information sooner than the outcome measure would allow action. In the polio example, an in process measure example could be % of vaccination by the time a babies is 18 months old. And looking across a country say it might well make sense to stratify the data to see if certain areas were doing poorly on this measure. If so that might be where to focus improvement. You don’t need to wait until people not vaccinated start contracting polio (which will likely be delayed for years after the system starts to have processes fail, in this example) to then notice the problem and then react. Waiting for the outcome measure to point to a problem in this case (and in many cases) is far too late for process improvement. So process measures are needed to aid in managing the system and reacting to process results, before those processes create poor results (and can be seen as poor outcome measures). ToC project: In-process measures may be useful for software development. Process measures and outcomes measures are more likely to be useful for public dissemination of information. The main reason is that we are limited to indicators, so we will be providing highlights of processes that are well-chosen rather than details of processes themselves.