Tips for Working with Different Social Styles

advertisement

Tool Summary

Tool Title:

Tips for Working with Different Social Styles

Source:

Seagate Technology; Corporate Executive Board; Social Styles® (David Merrill and Roger Reid)

HR Business Partner Portal Topic Area:

Design & Management of the HRBP Team

Purpose:

To identify most and least appropriate techniques for working effectively with HRBPs through the understanding of social styles.

User Guidelines:

Use the models provided below to identify your personal style and determine how best to communicate with individuals with distinct styles.

HR Business Partner Context:

As leaders of a team, HRBP managers should consider the various social styles present among that team. By illuminating and addressing four communication styles, this exercise builds understanding between HRBP managers and their direct reports as well as HRBP team cohesion.

Although this tool allows users to choose either David Merrill’s Social Styles Model or Seagate

Technology’s Distinct Style matrix, HRBP managers may use other models as well to evaluate styles and appropriate techniques for working with various individuals.

See the Corporate Leadership Council's HR Business Partner Portal at www.clc.executiveboard.com

for updates and additional tools and insights.

Insert your logo here

Exercise to Recognize and Address Various Social Styles within the

HRBP Team

Step 1: Identify and Understand Your Style

This is not an exercise for conducting an in-depth self-analysis.

Instead, this exercise serves to evaluate your style and different styles of clients to help you identify ways to effectively communicate and work together.

Use one of the models (Merrill’s or Seagate’s) and align yourself with one of the four styles that most fits you at work (see next page)

Step 2: Brainstorm Ways to Communicate with the Different Styles

Ask yourself:

 What are two effective approaches an HR Business Partner could use with me?

 What is the worst approach an HR Business Partner could use with me?

Consider individually or as a group:

What are two effective approaches to use with Analytical (or A) styles?

What is one technique you would never use with Analytical (or A) styles?

What are two effective approaches to use with Expressive (or B) styles?

What is one technique you would never use with Expressive (or B) styles?

What are two effective approaches to use with Amiable (or C) styles?

What is one technique you would never use with Amiable (or C) styles?

What are two effective approaches to use with Driver (or D) styles?

 What is one technique you would never use with Driver (or D) styles?

Step 3: Select Approaches and Techniques that Work Best with the Client

Understand the client’s style and your style

Experiment with techniques that might work well with the client and gauge his/her reaction

Identify areas where you can appreciate the client

Consider modifying your approach given reactions

See the Corporate Leadership Council's HR Business Partner Portal at www.clc.executiveboard.com

for updates and additional tools and insights.

Source: Seagate Technology; Corporate Executive Board;

David Merrill; Corporate Leadership Council research.

.

Two Models for Evaluating Your Style and Others’ Styles

Model 1: Seagate’s “Four Distinct Styles” Matrix

Seagate Technology created a simple, four-box matrix that lists characteristics of four different styles. Although individuals combine elements from more than one style and may switch styles, depending on the situation, focus on you or your client’s most dominant style for the purposes of this exercise.

A (Analytical)

Drills down to the details

Responsible, implements

Values duty, loyalty, service

Can micro-manage

Keeps on task in meetings

C (Amiable)

Concerned about impact on people

Avoids conflict

Likes to get consensus, involve people

Communicates, asks questions

Concerned about the process at meetings

B (Expressive)

Excited about vision for the future

Motivated by challenge

Likes to talk about opportunities

Makes plans with little follow-through

Impatient with human concerns

D (Driver)

Values action, change, risk-taking

Impatient with those who bring up obstacles

Does not need all the information before making a decision

Practical, not theoretical

Insert your logo here

See the Corporate Leadership Council's HR Business Partner Portal at www.clc.executiveboard.com

for updates and additional tools and insights.

Source: Seagate Technology; Corporate Executive Board;

David Merrill; Corporate Leadership Council research.

Insert your logo here

Two Models for Evaluating Your Style and Others’ Styles

(Continued)

Model 2: Merrill’s “Social Styles” Model

Merrill’s Social Styles arranges four styles—Analytical, Expressive, Amiable, and Driver—around two axes: responsiveness and aggressiveness.

Ask

Amiable

(C)

Relationship

Expressive

(B)

Tell

Analytical

(A)

Driver

(D)

Task

As with the Seagate model, although individuals combine elements from more than one style and may switch styles, depending on the situation, focus on your or the HRBP’s most dominant style for the purposes of this exercise.

Analytical (A) Expressive (B) Amiable (C)

Avoids Attacks Acquiesce

Driver (D)

Autocratic Style when Stressed:

Measures personal value by:

Specialty:

For growth needs to:

Wants to save:

Activity Applause Attention Results

Needs climate that:

Words used to describe:

May be viewed as:

Take time to be:

Support their:

Technical

Decide

Face

Provides details

Social

Check

Effort

Inspires to their goals

Supportive

Initiate

Relationships

Suggests

Organized

Thorough

Logical

Prudent

Accurate

Conscientious

Enthusiastic

Ambitious

Creative

Fast-Paced

Optimistic

Confident

Diplomatic

Loyal

Supportive

Friendly

Considerate

Relaxed

Critical

Indecisive

Stuffy

Picky

Manipulative

Excitable

Undisciplined

Reactionary

Conforming

Unsure

Pliant

Dependent

Moralistic Egotistical Awkward

When interacting with the style YOU SHOULD:

Accurate

Principles and thinking

Stimulating

Dreams and intuitions

Agreeable

Relationships and feelings

Control

Listen

Time

Allows to build own structure

Direct

Assertive

Results-Oriented

Independent

Decisive

Competitive

Pushy

Severe

Tough

Dominating

Harsh

Efficient

Conclusions and actions

Persuade them by telling/answering:

For decision, give them:

How

Evidence and service

Who

Testimony and incentives

Why

Guarantees and assurances

What

Evidence and service

See the Corporate Leadership Council's HR Business Partner Portal at www.clc.executiveboard.com

for updates and additional tools and insights.

Source: Seagate Technology; Corporate Executive Board;

David Merrill; Corporate Leadership Council research.

.

Download