Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 Political Science 277 Research Methods in Political Science Fall 2008 MWF 8 am, Lab M 6:30 pm HAL 301 Dr. Samuel S. Stanton, Jr. Office: HAL 303E Office Hours: MWF 9-11 am, MW 4-5 pm, TTh 11:30 am – 12:30 pm Phone: ext. 3854 Email: SSStanton@gcc.edu Webpage: http://www2.gcc.edu/dept/pols/faculty/stanton/ “I am unpersuaded by the view that the prime rules of scientific method should differ between ‘hard science’ and the social sciences. Science is science.” --Stephen Van Evera, Guide to Methods Overview: This course is designed to introduce students to the concepts and mechanics of political science research. The process of scientific political research will be the starting point for the course, which will then proceed to an understanding of gathering and testing data using basic statistical methods. The course begins with consideration of what makes political science a “science”. What logic must we follow to engage in scientific consideration of political phenomenon? That is, how is research conducted, how is it designed, what is the process by which we engage in the study of political phenomenon? The course moves on to consider approaches to quantitative research. The topics in this section are based on understanding the gathering of data and design of research tests. What are the fundamental concepts required to understand quantitative methods in political science? How are samples collected? What is the difference between a sample and population? How are tests designed to make the best use of the sample data? The next section of the course focuses on statistical concepts in the quantitative research process. Included in this section is understanding the use of descriptive statistics, and nonparametric measures of statistical relationship. Students will become familiar with use of excel and SPSS for statistical analysis and with the proper methods of reporting research results using tables, charts, and graphs. This course is primarily focused on quantitative methods of political analysis. Time permitting qualitative methods will also be discussed. Quantitative analysis requires the development of an understanding for use of statistics to analyze the relationship between variables. Using statistics does mean using mathematical formulas. However, none of the formulas for this course exceed what a person could reasonably be expected to have learned in a basic college algebra class. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 Goals: To assist students in developing fundamental skills of research and analysis for use in the scientific study of political phenomenon. To help students examine the application of this knowledge to their futures. To assist students in living lives that glorify and honor God through the advancement of knowledge. Outcomes: Students will exhibit the ability to apply scientific research principles to political phenomenon. (Dept. Obj. 2, 6, 7) Students will show understanding of the scientific method of conducting research. (Dept. Obj. 2, 4, 5, 6) Students will show ability to generate research questions and conduct a research project to answer a generated question. (Dept. Obj. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7) Students will exhibit ability to conduct data entry and data analysis using SPSS. (Dept. Obj. 2, 4, 7). Measurement of Goals and Outcomes: Measurement of goals and outcomes will be made by use of regularly scheduled homework and lab assignments, an objective and quantitative final examination, the course paper written and corrected in three segments, and the observation of student involvement in regular class meetings and scheduled lab sessions. General Objectives for Students Majoring in Political Science 1. Have acquired knowledge of the four major subject areas (American Politics, Political Theory, International Relations, and Comparative Politics) of political science 2. Be Competitive for graduate and professional school opportunities. Political science majors with strong academic records will be competitive for both master’s and Ph.D. programs in political science and other professional programs and will be competitive for financial stipends. 3. Be familiar with entry level jobs suitable for political science majors. 4. Be competitive for entry level jobs suitable for political science majors. 5. Have the ability to read, comprehend, and evaluate content in professional political science journals, scholarly books, and websites.. 6. Show familiarity with, and the ability to critically evaluate, information sources in the Social Sciences. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 7. Demonstrate a mastery of research and writing skills in the field of political science. 8. Develop and capacity to apply a Christian moral principles to issues and topics within political science, including using a Christian perspective to evaluate critically political ideas, public policies, and political figures. Simply stated, our aim is that students will seek to understand the field of politics as individuals who are committed to historic Christian thought. Course Requirements: This course demands student participation. Many technical and challenging concepts will be discussed in class that may not be as clear if a student only has the benefit of reading the text. So, attendance is highly recommended. There will be numerous homework assignments during the semester and a course paper that will be developed and graded in sections over the length of the semester. YOU WILL NEED TO BRING YOUR LAPTOP/NOTEBOOK COMPUTER TO ALL CLASS MEETINGS. Participation: You cannot participate if you are not present. I do not call roll often and I do not expect that every student will be present for every class period. However, I do expect you to be present unless there are mitigating circumstances such as illness and university sanctioned event participation. Participation is more than simply being in the room, participation is discussion, questioning, and answering. This represents 20% of your grade. Homework: There will be several homework assignments that will count as 35% of the grade in the course. There are enough homework assignments that no single assignment will torpedo your grade, but the assignments should not be taken lightly. You will be given notice in class when homework is due. On rare occasion, homework will be given out during class and students will be required to complete it and return the assignment that day (when this is done, emailing the assignment is acceptable). Course Paper: The course paper will be developed in sections over the course of the semester. The sections are: 1) Introduction, Theory, Hypotheses and Literature Review; 2) Data, Concepts, Models, and Analysis; and, 3) Findings and Conclusions. As each section is turned in, It will be commented on and returned to the student with a grade. This grade is what the paper merits without correction at this point in time. When the next section is due, it is expected that the student will also correct the previous section and resubmit the whole. In this manner, the only part of the work that will not have been proofed and commented on prior to the end of the project is the Findings and Conclusions. The paper is to be written using style guidelines found in the Guide to Writing Research Papers section of this syllabus. The paper will be 15-20 pages in length when completed, as each of the 3 sections should be at least 5 pages. Proper margins and a standard 12 point font are expected. The paper is 35% of the grade. For this paper students must develop a question about U.S. Politics, either domestic or foreign policy. You are required to use a version of the American National Election Survey (available in the course public folder) as your dataset for the paper. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 Final Exam: Per Grove City College regulations, there will be a final exam given during the scheduled time. The exam will cover all aspects of the course. This exam is 10% of your overall grade. Grade: Participation Homework Paper Final Exam 20% 35% 35% 10% Grading Scale: 90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 Below 60 A B C D F The final computed grade is rounded off. If you have a 79.5 it becomes an 80 and receives a mark of B, a grade of 79.44 is rounded off to 79 and you have a C. +/- grades are given on the basis of student performance during the semester. Attendance and Behavior: You are adults in an upper division course, I feel no compulsion to take role and keep tabs on your attendance. However, you cannot participate if you are not in attendance. This course will center on discussion of the literature as a pathway to learning critical thinking skills. Civility is required, so see Will Moore’s essay on civility located on my website. Plagiarism: Plagiarism is a serious violation of moral and academic principles. It involves claiming as one’s own original work the ideas, phrasing, or creative work of another person. As such, plagiarism is a direct violation of the biblical commandments against stealing, bearing false witness, and covetousness; thus, the Grove City College policy. We encourage our students to think seriously about the demands of their Christian faith in regards to this issue. We remind students that plagiarism includes the following: 1) any direct quotation of another’s words, from simple phrasing to longer passages, without using quotation marks and properly citing the source of those words; 2) any summary or paraphrase of another’s ideas without properly citing the source of those ideas; 3) any information that is not common knowledge —including facts, statistics, graphics, drawings—without proper citation of sources; 4) any cutting and pasting of verbal or graphic materials from another source— including books, databases, web sites, journals, newspapers, etc.—without the proper citation for each of the sources of those materials; this includes any Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 copyrighted artwork, graphics, or photography downloaded from the Internet without proper citation; 5) any wholesale “borrowing,” theft, or purchasing of another’s work and presenting it as one’s own, whether from the Internet or from another source; 6) any presentation of “ghost-written” papers—whether paid for or not—as one’s own original work; 7) making one’s work available for copying by others, as well as copying work posted on the Internet or otherwise made available by another. The above statement is taken from the Grove City College Bulletin and The Crimson. Plagiarism in written work in this course will result in a grade of 0 being assigned to that work. Opportunity to correct and resubmit the work is based on time remaining in the course, nature of the plagiarism (is it simply forgotten or improper citation or is it cutting and pasting entire sections of someone else’s work), and whether or not this is a repeat offense for the individual student. Communication: Things always change over the course of a semester, which necessitates changing dates for assignments and the course outline. I will communicate with you as much information as possible at the start of each class. As a backup to this, I will create an email list for the class and will email all pertinent information to the members of this class, so check your email. If you email me, do not leave the subject line blank, I delete email with blank subject lines without reading it. Text: The text and workbook can be purchased as a package. Janet B. Johnson and H.T. Reynolds, (2007). Political Science Research Methods, 6th Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press Course Outline: (This Outline is not set in stone and will change as necessary). Aug 25-Sep 26 Designing Scientific Political Research 1. Course Introduction/Examination of Syllabus and Text 2. What is Political Science Research (J & R Chap 1) 3. The Science of Political Science (J & R Chap 2) --the science of Political Science --logic and reasoning --why engage in scientific research? 4. The Research Process --identify the problem --establish objectives --pick a strategy --prepare a plan/proposal --gather data --analyze the data --presenting findings 5. Finding and Focusing on Research Topics Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 6. Research Design (J & R Chap 3) --theory --literature review --hypotheses --tests (quantitative designs) --findings --conclusions Sep 29-Oct 27 Building Blocks of Social Science Research 1. Hypotheses, Concepts, Variables (J & R Chap 4) Hypotheses --proposed answer to the research question --formulating good hypotheses Concepts --a measurable idea Variables --measurement of a concept 2. Measurement (J & R Chap 5) --methods/strategies --accuracy -reliability -validity --precision 3. Literature Review (J & R Chap 6) --Why do a lit review? --How to conduct a lit review --Using internet sources 4. Sampling (J&R Chap 7) --basics --types --inference -distribution -margin of error 5. Observations (J & R Chap 8) --techniques of data collection --types of observation -direct -indirect --ethics of observation Oct 29-Dec 10 Gathering and Analyzing Data 1. Interviews and Surveys (J&R Chap 10) --interviewing elites --how to ask questions --how to order and design questionnaires --validity and inference from surveys Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 2. Univariate Analysis/Descriptive Statistics (J&R Chap 11) --frequency distributions --mean, median, mode (descriptives) --normal distribution/statistical inference 3. Bivariate Analysis (J&R Chap 12) --Crosstabulation -strength of relationship -direction of relationship -creating and interpreting tabulations -statistical independence -association -statistical significance --Difference of Means --Regression -modeling -parameters -fit of model -fit of regression line -test of significance -correlation --substantive versus statistical significance PAPER DEADLINES (sections of paper are due in my office by 5 pm on due date) Section 1 (Introduction, Theory, Hypotheses, Literature Review) due 10/27. Section 2 (Data, Concepts, Models, Analysis*) and Section 1 rewrite due 10/21. Section 3 (Findings and Conclusions) rewrites of Section 1 and 2 due 12/10. * at the time this material is due, we may or may not have already covered regression analysis, if we have not you do not need to include a regression at this time, but should include a regression in the final product. Final Exam will be at the scheduled time. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 GUIDE FOR WRITING RESEARCH PAPERS A research paper should pose a question about some relevant event or behavior. This question should be easily recognizable and found somewhere in the first page of your paper. Included in the introduction of your paper should be a defense of why anyone should care about finding an answer to your question. You must conduct a literature review that critically evaluates how other scholarship has addressed the general area of your question (or in some cases, how other scholarship has addressed your question specifically). The literature review serves two purposes: One, it allows you to develop a theoretical explanation of how events or behaviors occur. Two, it allows you to determine and explain how your paper adds to our knowledge of the event or behavior (strengthening your argument about why we should care to read your paper). Your proposed answer to the research question is your hypothesis. The hypothesis suggests factors that contribute to or impede the event or behavior in question. Hypotheses infer something about events or behaviors based on interpretation of some observation(s). What this means is that in political science we are in the business of inferring causation, if you want to simply report what is, take a journalism class. The hypothesis is a testable claim. By using quantitative or qualitative methods, you test the hypothesis for strength and validity. This means specifying how you are measuring and interpreting causal factors. It also means reaching findings (inferences) about whether or not your hypothesis provides a quality answer to the research question. Research papers end with a conclusion section that ties everything together. What do we learn about the event or behavior from the research you have conducted? What does this tell us about the world and its future? Research relies on the evaluation of multiple sources. If you rely on one or two sources for most or all of your research you have engaged in plagiarism. Papers that include plagiarism earn an automatic 0. Popular media should generally be avoided as a source of information (although use of sources such as the New York Times, London Times, etc. for specificity of events and statements made by people is acceptable). Textbooks should also generally be avoided as a source of information (if you have a question about whether or not a book is a textbook, just ask your professor). Generally, for a paper of 20 pages in length you would desire about 15 quality sources of information. Style and grammar do matter. Because grammar matters, proofread!!! Because grammar matters do not use dangling modifiers, end sentences with prepositions, use sentence fragments, etc. Because style matters, look at a style manual and use appropriate citation style (not citing the source of information used in your paper is plagiarism), use appropriate bibliography styles, and always number your pages appropriately. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 In Political Science, two styles are prevalent in the scholarly literature—APSA, which is a revised form of APA, and Turabian, also known as the Chicago Manual of Style (which was originally edited by Katherine Turabian). Since the purpose of this course is in part to correctly train you in appropriate writing technique for professional political science work, you will find provided for you in the space below, examples of proper in-text citation, proper footnote citations, and proper bibliographical citations. For all other issues (page numbering, title pages, subdivisions (chapters, sub-chapters, etc.) within a paper, etc.) use APSA or Turabian style. A copy of the APSA style manual may be borrowed for 24 hours from Dr. Stanton. IN-TEXT CITATION (APSA): Olzak (1992) offers an ecological theory of ethnic conflict. The basis of the theory is competition causes conflict. James (2002) refers to competition as the moral equivalent of war. Competition is an embedded structure in humans and affects the actions of individuals. When translated into group settings we see similarities to sports teams athletic contests. The struggle becomes “us vs. them”, a struggle for glory, reputation, and prestige. Competition is so ingrained it cannot be rooted out of the behavioral patterns of people. As James notes, our ancestors bred it into us (2002, 146). Competition for resources and position are fuel for a greater dilemma. Any gain made by a group will elicit a response from at least one other group in society, decreasing stability and increasing the likelihood of the security dilemma. NOTE: if you are using in-text citation, footnotes or endnotes are used solely for the purpose of providing additional information that was not warranted as part of the actual text. NOTE: if you directly quote or use ideas directly from a source, it requires year and page number as in the third citation in the example paragraph. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 FOOTNOTES/END NOTES (Turabian): Olzak1 offers an ecological theory of ethnic conflict. The basis of the theory is competition causes conflict. James2 refers to competition as the moral equivalent of war. Competition is an embedded structure in humans and affects the actions of individuals. When translated into group settings we see similarities to sports teams athletic contests. The struggle becomes “us vs. them”, a struggle for glory, reputation, and prestige. Competition is so ingrained it cannot be rooted out of the behavioral patterns of people. As James notes, our ancestors bred it into us.3 Competition for resources and position are fuel for a greater dilemma. Any gain made by a group will elicit a response from at least one other group in society, decreasing stability and increasing the likelihood of the security dilemma. NOTE: It would also be permissible in footnote/end note number 3 to simply use Ibid., 146. NOTE: If using end notes, the footnotes below would follow the last page of text. 1 Olzak, Susan. The Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict and Competition, 1992. James, William, “The Moral Equivalent to War,” in Betts, Richard K. ed. Conflict After the Cold War, Arguments on the Causes of War and Peace, 2002, 145-151 3 James, William, “The Moral Equivalent to War,” in Betts, Richard K. ed. Conflict After the Cold War, Arguments on the Causes of War and Peace, 2002, 146. 2 Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 BIBLIOGRAPHICAL MATERIAL: Books: Olzak, Susan. The Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict and Competition, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992. Volkan, Vamik. Bloodlines, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1997. The World Almanac, 1985-1998, Mahwah, NJ: Funk and Wagnell. NOTE: The last reference is for a book without an author. Note that items are singlespaced within and that a double-space is used between items. Also, items are not numbered. Chapter within an edited Volume: Snyder, Jack and Robert Jervis. “Civil War and the Security Dilemma,” in Barbara Walter and Jack Snyder, Eds., Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention, New York: Columbia University Press, 1999, 15-37. Journal Article: Saideman, S., Lanoue, D., Campenni, M., and Stanton, S. “Democratization, Political Institutions, and Ethnic Conflict: A Pooled Time Series Analysis, 1985-1998,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 1 (February 2002): 103-129. Newspaper Article: Cuff, Daniel F. “Forging a New Shape for Steel,” New York Times, 26 May 1985, sec. F. (if in electronic format) Loeb, Vernon, “Fallout from a CIA Affidavit,” Washington Post, <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/A 1998-2000Apr23.html> April 24, 2000. NOTE: April 24, 2000 represents the day the article was accessed. This date must be included. This is done because on-line availability changes regularly and this provides readers with a point of reference to use in tracking down a copy of the item. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 Other Electronically Accessed Resources: Bennett, D. Scott, and Christian Davenport. 2003. MARGene v1.0. Software. <http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/mar/margene.htm>. Accessed May 8, 2003. Bhutan. Webdb International Programs 2003. <http://webdb.iu.edu/internationalprograms/scripts/accesscoveragepage.cfm? country=bhutan>. Accessed May 5, 2003. BIBLIOGRAPHY AS A COHERENT WHOLE: Bennett, D. Scott, and Christian Davenport. 2003. MARGene v1.0. Software. <http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/mar/margene.htm>. Accessed May 8, 2003. Bhutan. Webdb International Programs 2003. <http://webdb.iu.edu/internationalprograms/scripts/accesscoveragepage.cfm? country=bhutan>. Accessed May 5, 2003. Cuff, Daniel F. “Forging a New Shape for Steel,” New York Times, 26 May 1985, sec. F. Loeb, Vernon, “Fallout from a CIA Affidavit,” Washington Post, <http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/A 1998-2000Apr23.html> April 24, 2000. Olzak, Susan. The Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict and Competition, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992. Saideman, S., Lanoue, D., Campenni, M., and Stanton, S. “Democratization, Political Institutions, and Ethnic Conflict: A Pooled Time Series Analysis, 1985-1998,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 1 (February 2002): 103-129. Snyder, Jack and Robert Jervis. “Civil War and the Security Dilemma,” in Barbara Walter and Jack Snyder, Eds., Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention, New York: Columbia University Press, 1999, 15-37. Volkan, Vamik. Bloodlines, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1997. The World Almanac, 1985-1998, Mahwah, NJ: Funk and Wagnell. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 Points to Remember about Writing 1) This is a writing intensive course. However, it is not a grammar and composition course. If a paper is poorly written ( in terms of style and grammar) it becomes overly difficult to read and comprehend the content. I will correct the first section extensively, utilizing the rules for writing attached to the syllabus. On the second and third drafts/sections of the paper, I will quit grading if more than 7 errors (in accordance with the rules for writing) are noted on any one page. Notation of errors will be numeric and indicate a number to look at in the rules for writing. 2) Even if you write in a grammatically and stylistically correct manner, and even if you write a paper of appropriate length, you may not earn an A for the assignment. B is average, C is below average. An A represents superior work. Attempts to baffle and confuse should not be confused with logic and argumentation. A papers have all the proper elements and the added quality of challenging the reader to think about an issue in a manner that might not have occurred to the reader. A papers show mastery and command of the issue, not merely comprehension. In short, A papers are rare. Style and grammar are 30% of the grade. Content is 70% of the grade. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 Dr. Stanton’s Rules for Writing Built upon the work of a long line of mentors and colleagues Sentence Rules: 1. Do not begin sentences in any of the following ways: “There are/is…”, “This is…”, “It is…,” etc. 2. Do not use “this,” “these,” “that,” “those,” “which,” or “it” unless the word has a clear and unmistakable antecedent nearby. Never begin a sentence with “this” unless you follow it immediately with a noun that re-identifies the idea to which you are referring. 3. Never publicly dangle a participle or misplace a modifier: write “Showing unmistakable signs of ignorance, the student did not persuade his professor;” NOT> “The student did not persuade his professor, showing unmistakable signs of ignorance.” 4. Never write an incomplete sentence (participles -- “ing” words -- cannot stand as verbs). A verb must agree with its subject in person and number. 5. Know these three rules about commas: a. Join independent clauses (clauses with a subject and a verb) either by using (1) a comma with a conjunction (“Right-handers predominantly use the left side of the brain, so left-handers are the only ones in their right minds.”) or (2) a semicolon without a conjunction (“Right-handers predominantly use the left side of the brain; left-handers are the only ones in their right minds.”) b. Separate items in a series by using a comma after every item before the conjunction (“The professor was arbitrary, arrogant, and heartless.”) c. Never use a comma between the subject and the verb or between the verb and its object (except for interrupting clauses that use two (2) commas). 6. Bury words like “however,” “furthermore,” “moreover,” “indeed,” etc. (conjunctive adverbs) in the clause or sentence; do not put them at the beginning. (E.g. “The students, however, learned something.”) 7. Be consistent when you have two or more parallel structures. With adjectives: “He was pompous, picky, and terrorized freshmen” is wrong. “He was pompous, picky, and fond of terrorizing freshmen” is right. With prepositions: “A student could count on his bad temper and arbitrariness” is wrong. “A student could count on his bad temper and on his arbitrariness” is right. With correlatives: “He graded a paper not only for content but for style” is wrong. “He graded a paper not only for content but also for style” is right. 8. Do not end a sentence with a preposition. 9. Do not use the passive voice (“Careless students are failed by the ruthless professor”); use the active voice (“The ruthless professor fails careless students”). Because the active voice is direct and clear, this rule is the most important of style, but it has serious consequences for your meaning as well. Politicians, administrators, and those foolishly trying to avoid the consequences of their actions love the passive voice because it protects them from facts and responsibility: “Mistakes were made.” 10. Adverbs should be adverbs. Do not do it different – if you know what I am saying. 11. Walker’s Rule for Pronouns: every pronoun should have a clear antecedent to which it agrees in person, number, and gender. Paragraph and Thesis Rules: 12. Each paragraph must stick to the subject introduced by its first sentence. Most importantly, the first sentence of the first paragraph must establish the context of your Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 paper. “John Wayne first appears in Stagecoach with a rifle in his hand.” NOT> “Duke has a gun.” 13. Do not use one or two sentences as a paragraph. 14. Make the transition between your sentences and your paragraphs clear and logical. This task is the most difficult in writing, but, as you know, life is hard. 15. Give your paper a clear thesis sentence at the end of your first paragraph. If you can remember only one rule, this rule is the one you must remember. The first paragraph should also demonstrate how the rest of the paper is organized. 16. Avoid using quotations to begin or end a paragraph or a paper. Your own words are most important in those places. 17. In longer papers remind the reader of your thesis throughout the body of your paper. Rules concerning Argumentation: 18. Never just summarize or paraphrase. Assume your reader has read/seen it. I do not want to know what happened. I want to know your ideas about what happened. 19. Support your assertions and ideas with concrete examples, with brief quotes from the story, book, or film you are discussing, or with a short citation from some reliable authority. 20. Do not hedge. Words like “maybe,” “seem,” “perhaps,” and “might” do not keep you from being wrong; they merely alert the reader to the fact that you are worried about it. 21. Avoid vague generalizations: “as we all know,” “people say,” “since the beginning of time,” etc. Obvious claims such as “mankind would not exist without the heart” are equally lamentable. 22. Write about works of art in the present tense, since Hamlet will be stabbing Polonius and Roy Hobbs will be knocking the lights out with his home runs long after your grandchildren have forgotten your name. 23. Avoid rhetorical questions. 24. Delete the phrase “in the past” from your writing as well as any hint of chronological snobbery. Chronological snobbery is the erroneous assumption that, with the passage of time, mankind has gotten progressively wiser. In the past such a pedantic list of writing rules would have been unnecessary for undergraduates. 25. When citing a dictionary refer to the Oxford English Dictionary whenever possible. Diction Rules: 26. Do not misspell words. Misspelled words look dumb; do not look dumb. Use a dictionary or a literate friend to check your spelling. On a word processor always use spell-check, but do not trust it! Possessing a limited vocabulary and undiscerning between right words spelled wrongly and wrong words spelled rightly, spell-check is no substitute for proofreading. Spell out one and two digit numbers. 27. Never use contractions. 28. A possessive without an apostrophe is a misspelled word. One exception is the possessive of “it”: “its.” “It is” contracts to “it’s.” Since you will not use contractions, you will never write “it’s” on a paper. 29. Choose the best word for the context. Your papers should be a place “where every word is at home, taking its place to support the others” (Eliot “Little Gidding,” V.217218). Beware of unintended irony: an N.C. State basketballer once explained his ability to Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 shoot with either hand, “yeah, I’m amphibious.” Suffice it to say this student-athlete, to avoid drowning in his coursework, crawled out of school and into the NBA. 30. Also beware these other egregious violations of Rule Twenty-Nine (29): jargon (say “library”; do not say “instructional media center”), cliche (say “the professor is a conservative grouch”; do not say “the professor is an old fogey”), slang (say “the teacher is foolish”; do not say “the teacher is a dork”), hyperbole (say “this man has too high a regard for himself”; do not say “this man is the most arrogant jerk who ever lived”), gobbledygook (say “now”; do not say “at this point in time”), and malapropism (confusion of idioms; one former NFL player commented, “I really cleaned his bell; I rang his clock”). 31. Use your smallest most Anglo-Saxon, most comfortable words; big words impress only high school teachers and smell of the thesaurus. 32. Lose the word “very” and, like, you know, other gratuitous additives from, you know, your written and spoken vocabulary. 33. Non-English words should be italicized. Foreign words and terms that are not commonly used should be defined when initially used in the paper. Format Rules: 34. Number your pages. 35. Use the Chicago Manual of Style (Turabian) or APA/APSA for your papers. MLA is not acceptable. 37. Give your paper an informative title. The name of the work you are dealing with is NOT the title of your paper. “Shakespeare’s Use of Time in Hamlet” is by a thoughtful person; “It Takes a Broken Egghead to Make a Hamlet” is by a clown; Hamlet is by Shakespeare. 37. Italicize all full-length films, plays, and books. Do likewise with magazine and newspaper titles. Short stories, film shorts, one-act plays, and articles go in quotation marks (“…”). Do not underline or put your own title in quotation marks. 38. On those extremely rare occasions when you quote more than two lines of text, indent five spaces left and right and single space the quotation, and leave off the quotation marks. 39. When you quote from or refer to a source, cite it appropriately and include a works cited page of some kind. 40. When you borrow and idea or paraphrase statements from existing scholarship, give appropriate citation. 41. Print your paper out only on the front side of the pages. 42. Use 1” margins top, bottom, and right, use a 1 ½” margin on the left side of pages. 43. Use Times New Roman 12 point font. 44. If a header is used on page 1 to identify you, the course and the date, this material should be single-spaced and have minimal spacing between it and the body of the paper and it should be used only on the first page. 45. Before handing in your final copy, have an intelligent friend read your paper to you; then fix it. 46. Be safe: frequently save your file, and if possible keep a hard copy, and/or a version on another drive. Stanton POLS 277 Fall 08 47. Do not hand in a paper unless you have come to care about it. You believe in goodness and truth; therefore, commit yourself to communicating your ideas well and true.