REFERENCES

Alodeh, M.H., doller R., Dummer P.M. (1989). “Shaping of simulated root
canals in resin blocks using the step-back technique with K-files manipulated
in a simple in/out filling motion.” Int Endod J 22(3): 107-17.

Andreasen, G., Wass K., Chan K.C. (1985). A review of superelastic and
thermodynamic nitinol wire.” Quintessence Int 16(9): 623-6.

Andreasen, G.F., Morrow R.E. (1978). “Laboratory and clinical analysis of
nitinol wire.” Am J Orthod 73(2): 142-51

Baumann M. A. (2004). “Nickel titanium: options and challenges”. Dent
Clin N Am (43) 55-67.

Baumann, M.A., Roth A. (1999). “Effect of experience on quality of canal
preparation with rotary nickel-titanium files.” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88(6): 714-8.

Bergmans, L., Van Cleynenbreugel J., Wevers M., Lambrechts P. (2001).
“Mechanical root canal preparation with NiTi rotary instruments: rationale,
performance and safety. Status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.”
Am J Dent 14(5): 342-33.

Bryant, S.T., Dummer P. M., Pitoni C., Bourba M., Moghal S. (1999).
“Shaping ability of .04 and .06 taper ProFile rotary nickel-titanium
instruments in simulated root canals.” Int Eddod J 31(4): 275-81.

Buchanan, L.S. (2000). “The standardized-taper root canal preparation—Part
1. Concepts for variably tapered shaping instruments.” Int Endod J 33(6):
516-29.

Buehler, W.J., Wang F.E. (1968). “A summary of recent research on the
Nitinol alloys and their potential application in ocean engineering.” Ocean
Engineering 1: 105-20.

Chan, A. W., Cheung G.S. (1996). “A comparison of stainless steel and
nickel-titanium K-files in curved root canals.” Int Endod J 29(6): 370-5.

Deplazes, P., Peters O., Barbakow F. (2001). “Comparing apical preparations
of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickeltitanium hand instruments.” J Endod 27(3): 196-202.

Eldeeb, M.E., Boraas J.C. (1985). “The effect of different files on the
preparation shape of severely curved canals.” Int. Endod J. 18(1): 1-7).

Gharehgozloo B., McDonald N. (2003). “A comparison of the canal centering
ability of K3 and ProFile Nickel Titanium rotary files”. J Endod 29(4),
(Abstract).

Gilles, J.A., del Rio C.E. (1990). “Comparison of the Canal Master
endodontic instrument and K-type files for enlargement of curved root
canals.” J Endod 16(12): 561-5.

Glosson, C.R., Haller R.H., Dove S.B., del Rio C.E.(1995). “A comparison of
root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven and K-Flex
endodontic instruments.” J Endod 21(3): 146-51.

Gluskin, A.H., Brown D.C., Buchanan L.S. (2001). “A reconstructed
computerized tomographic comparison of Ni-Ti rotary GT files versus
traditional instruments in canals shaped by novice operators.” Int Endod J
34(6): 467-84.

Hulsmann. M., Gambal A., Bahr R. (1999b). “An improved technique for the
evaluation of root canal preparation.” Int Endod J 19(3): 141-5.

Kavanagh, D., Lumley P.J. (1998). “An in vitro evaluation of canal
preparation using ProFile .04 and .06 taper instruments.” Endod Dent
Traumatol 14(1): 16-20.

Ottosen, S.R., Nicholls J.I., Steiner J.C. 1999).
“A comparison of
instrumentation using Naviflex and ProFile nickel-titanium engine-driven
rotary instruments.” J Endod (25(6): 457-60.

Park, H. (2001. “A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless
steel files to shape curved root canals.” Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral
Radiol Endod 91(6):715-8.

Ruddle, C. J. (2001). “The ProTaper endodontic system:
features, and guidelines for use.” Dent Today 20(10):60-7.

Schafer, E., Vlassis M. (2004 a). “Comparative investigation of two rotary
nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability
in simulated curved canals”. Int Endod J 38-229: (4)37.

Schafer, E., Vlassis M. (2004 a). “Comparative investigation of two rotary
nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning
effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted
teeth.” Int Edndod J. 48-239: (4)37.

Short, J. A., Morgan L. A., Baumgartner J.C. (1997). “A comparison of canal
centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.” J endod 23(8): 503-7.

Thompson, S. A., Dummer P.M. (1997e). “Shaping ability of ProFile .04
Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals.
Part 1. “Int Endod J 30(1): 1-7.

Thompson, S. A., Dummer P.M. (1997f). “Shaping ability of ProFile .04
Taper Series 29 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals.
Part 2. “Int Endod J 30(1): 8-15.
geometries,

Thompson, S. A., Dummer P.M. (1998a). “Shaping ability of Quantec Series
2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. “Int
Endod J 31(4): 259-67.

Thompson, S. A., Dummer P.M. (1998b). “Shaping ability of Quantec Series
2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. “Int
Endod J 31(4): 268-74.

Thompson, S. A., Dummer P.M. (2000a). “Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary
nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1. “Int Endod J
33(3): 248-54.

Thompson, S. A., Dummer P.M. (2000b). “Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary
nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. “Int Endod J
33(3): 255-61.

Versumer, J., Hulsmann M., Schafers F. (2002). “ comparative study of root
canal preparation using ProFile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.”
Int endod J 35(1): 37-46.

Walia, H.M., Brantley W..A., Gerstein H. (1988). “An initial investigation of
the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files.: J Endod
14(7): 346-51.

Zuolo, M.L., Walton R.E., Murgel C. A. (1992). “Canal Master files:
scanning electrón microscopio evaluation of new instruments and their wear
with clinical usage.” J Endod 18(7): 33.9-6.