TESTS AND MEASUREMENT PSY 444 and 544 Spring 2006 Instructor: Andrew Downs, Ph.D. Office: PS 432 Office Hours: TBA Email: downsa@cwu.edu Class Time: 8:00-8:50 MTRF Classroom: PS 260 Phone: 963-2379 Course Description: This 4-credit course is designed to introduce students to the field of psychological assessment. Course content will primarily be delivered via lecture; however, students will also participate in several in-class cooperative learning projects designed to complement the material covered by the lectures. Please note this course is not designed to teach students to administer, score, or interpret psychological tests. The course focuses on test theory and the fundamentals of measurement, including the psychometric properties that support the use of various assessment methods. At the completion of this course students will understand test theory and how psychological assessments are developed and used in various settings. Please remember, completing this course does not qualify you to use any of the assessment methods introduced. Text: McIntire, S.A., & Miller, S.A. (2000). Foundations of psychological testing. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Additional Reading: A minimum of 10 research articles examining the psychometric properties of psychological tests. Course policies: 1. Expectations: You are expected to attend every class on time, read the assigned material before class, participate in class activities, and ask and answer questions. Do your part to make this a fun and interesting class. If you are excessively absent from class, your grade may be lowered at my discretion. 2. Quizzes: Quiz format may include multiple choice, short answer, and short essay, and will cover material from lectures, readings, and videos. There will be five regular quizzes administered during the quarter (60 points each). If you miss a quiz or have a low quiz score that you would like to get dropped, you will have the option of taking the comprehensive “make up” exam at the end of the quarter. Only five quiz scores will count towards your final grade, so if you take all five regular quizzes and the optional make up, your lowest quiz score will be dropped. No other make up exams will be allowed. 3. Research Paper: (120 points) You will be required to individually research and prepare a 12 page paper critiquing a psychological test of your choice. This assignment requires that you obtain, read, and cite at least 5 peer-reviewed journal articles that are relevant to the test you choose. Because this is a research paper you need to use specific examples from the research literature throughout to support your statements. In general, the more specific and detailed your paper is, the better your grade will be. Your paper will be graded according to the following criteria: General Descriptive Information (10 points) Title, author, first publication date, revision dates Where test can be obtained, permission/training required to use, cost Purpose and Nature of the Test (25 points) What the test measures, including all subscales What behavior the test requires of the taker Test target audience Nature of the test (objective/subjective, maximal performance/behavior observation/self-report, standardized/non-standardized) Test format What is the test used for? Specific examples of how the test has been used by researchers and practitioners Technical Evaluation (30 points) Describe the norm group Norm information provided (%iles, means, standard scores, etc.) Selection of norm group Subgroup norms Reliability How was reliability determined? Validity How was validity determined? Test Reviews (15 points) According to the research what are the strengths and weaknesses of the test? Evaluation (25 points) Is the test a good measure of the construct it is intended to measure? Describe why or why not. APA Style (10 points) References, in-text citations (-1 for each error) 5 Adequate research articles used Grammar, spelling, organization (5 points) -1 for each error 4. Group Presentations (90 points) You will work together in small groups, and will be expected to research, prepare, and present a 25-minute presentation critiquing a psychological test of your choice. The test must be a different one than group members critiqued for their research paper. Your presentation should be of professional quality, and the use of visual aids is highly recommended. It is expected that you will be “well rehearsed” and prepared to answer questions following your presentation. You will also provide a 2-3-page summary of your presentation, including a summary of the contributions of each group member, and an APA-style reference list of the sources used (minimum of 5, at least 4 of which are peerreviewed journal articles, and NO newspapers or magazines) to prepare your presentation. If you are unfamiliar with APA-style, you should refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th Edition, available in the library reference section, or in the Psychology Department office. You will sign up for your presentation date in class. The presentation will be worth 90 points and you will be evaluated as a group and for your individual contribution. Graduate students will be responsible for organizing their group and assigning work to undergraduate students. Group members should contribute equally in the preparation and presentation of the project. The presentations should follow the same general format as the research papers and will be graded as follows: General Descriptive Information (5 points) Title, author, first publication date, revision dates Where test can be obtained, permission/training required to use, cost Purpose and Nature of the Test (15 points) What the test measures, including all subscales What behavior the test requires of the taker Test target audience Nature of the test (objective/subjective, maximal performance/behavior observation/self-report, standardized/non-standardized) Test format What is the test used for? Specific examples of how the test has been used by researchers and practitioners Technical Evaluation (20 points) Describe the norm group Norm information provided (%iles, means, standard scores, etc.) Selection of norm group Subgroup norms Reliability How was reliability determined? Validity How was validity determined? Test Reviews (10 points) According to the research what are the strengths and weaknesses of the test? Evaluation (20 points) Is the test a good measure of the construct it is intended to measure? Describe why or why not. Presentation quality (15 points) Organization, professionalism, delivery, creativity APA Style (5 points) References, in-text citations (-1 for each error) 5 Adequate research articles used If you have any questions about the presentation or the research paper assignments ask me for assistance sooner rather than later, and I will be happy to help you. 5. Class Projects: (30 points) You will complete several small group projects in class throughout the quarter. You will receive five points for each day you participate in a group project. If you are not in class the day of a group project, you will not receive any points for that project. 6. Extra credit: All students will have the opportunity to earn up to 15 extra credits points by participating in more than the six graded in-class group projects. In other words, if you come to class regularly you will have more than six opportunities to participate in the group projects and you may earn up to 45 points total for participating in those class projects. 7. Grading: a. b. c. d. Quizzes: Research paper: Group presentation: Class projects: 5 x 60 points each = 300 points 1 x 120 points each = 120 points 1 x 90 points each = 90 points 6 x 5 points each = 30 points Total = 540 points e. Extra credit: Possible points = 15 points f. Graduate students: Your quizzes will be more difficult and your paper will be held to a higher standard for all grading criteria. 93% (502) 90% (486) 87% (469) 83% (448) 80% (432) 77% (415) =A = A= B+ =B = B= C+ 73% (394) 70% (378) 67% (361) 63% (340) 60% (324) 59% (<324) =C = C= D+ =D = D=F Please note that grades will not be “curved,” and there will be no opportunities to earn extra credit other than those listed on the syllabus. 7. Academic dishonesty: Cheating on exams and plagiarizing are prohibited. If you are caught cheating or plagiarizing you will receive a “0” for the exam or assignment and the incident will be reported to Student Affairs. A second offense will net you an “F” for the course, and possible further disciplinary action by the University. 8. Students who have special needs or disabilities that may affect their ability to access information or material presented in this course are encouraged to contact me or the ADA Compliance Officer and Director on campus at 509-963-2171 for additional disability-related educational accommodations. 9. Blackboard: All course study guides and grades will be posted on the class Blackboard site. Instructions for accessing the site will be given in class. Tentative schedule: DATE 3/28 3/30 3/31 4/3 4/4 4/6 4/7 4/10 4/11 4/13 4/14 4/17 4/18 4/20 4/21 4/24 4/25 4/27 4/28 5/1 5/2 5/4 5/5 5/8 5/9 5/11 5/12 5/15 5/16 5/18 5/19 5/22 5/23 5/25 5/26 5/29 5/30 5/30 6/1 6/2 TBA TOPIC Introduction, Categorizing Tests Categorizing Tests, Learning About Tests Learning About Tests, Ethics Ethics, Special Populations Special Populations, Quiz Review QUIZ #1 Interpreting Test Scores Interpreting Test Scores Interpreting Test Scores, Reliability Reliability Reliability Reliability, Quiz Review QUIZ #2 Validity Validity Decision Making Decision Making No Class – Presentation Work Day No Class – Presentation Work Day Construct Validity Construct Validity, Quiz Review QUIZ #3 Developing Tests Developing Tests Developing, Piloting Tests Presentations Presentations Piloting and Revising Tests Piloting and Revising Tests Survey Data Survey Data QUIZ #4 Tests in Education Tests in Education, Clinical Settings Tests in Clinical/Counseling Settings No Class- Memorial Day Research Papers Due in Class Tests in Clinical/Counseling Settings Tests in Organizations, Quiz Review QUIZ #5 OPTIONAL FINAL EXAM REQUIRED READING Syllabus, Ch 1 Ch 1 & 2 Ch 2 & 3 Ch 3 & 4 Ch 4 Chs 1-4 Ch 5 Ch 5 Ch 5, 6 Ch 6 Ch 6 Ch 6 Chs 5-6 Ch 7 Ch 7 Ch 8 Ch 8 Chs 7-9 Ch 10 Ch 10 Ch 10 & 11 Ch 11 Ch 11 Ch 12 Ch 12 Chs 10-12 Ch 13 Ch 13 &14 Ch 14 Ch 14 Ch 15 Chs 1-15 This course meets the following Washington State Residency-Level Benchmarks for School Counselors. These standards are reflected in WAC 180-78A-270 (a) (5) [Rev. 12/3/04]. PSY 544, Tests and Measurements (4 credits) STANDARD 2: School Counseling and Student Competencies. Certified school counselors know and can integrate academic, career, and personal/social student competencies, including Washington State Learning Goals and Essential Academic Learning Requirements, into the school counseling program; can teach counseling and guidance related material by using effective curriculum, instructional strategies, and instructional management; support teachers and parents in helping students develop knowledge and skill for learning, living and working; and provide information about best practices to a school community. Standard 02-1. Identifies needs of students in academic, career, personal, and social domains and determines positive impact on student learning; STANDARD 9: Student Assessment and Program Evaluation. Certified school counselors understand the basic principles and purposes of assessment; collection and use of data; regularly monitor student progress and are able to communicate the purposes, design, and results of assessments to various audiences; know basic principles of research design, action research, and program evaluation for purposes of program improvement and accountability. Standard 09-1. Assesses, interprets, and communicates results to students, faculty, and parents and community with respect to aptitude, achievement, interests, and learning styles; Standard 09-3. Collaborates with staff concerning assessment of students with special needs; Standard 09-4. Interprets results of Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) and/or other informal/formal assessments to a variety of audiences; STANDARD 11: Professionalism, Ethics, and Legal Mandates. Certified school counselors develop a professional identity congruent with knowledge of all aspects of professional functions, professional development, and state and national school counselor organizations. They adhere strictly to the profession's codes of ethics, especially those that have been established by the American Counseling Association (ACA), the American School Counselor Association (ASCA), the National Board for Certified Counselors (NBCC), and other relevant codes of ethics. They are familiar with state and federal policies, laws, and legislation relevant to school counseling. Standard 11-1. Writes and speaks effectively in formal and informal communications; Standard 11-7. Promotes appropriate use of assessment tools and presentation of relevant, unbiased data. This course addresses the following 2001 curriculum standard(s) for the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) under Section II (Program Objectives and Curriculum) and Standards for Mental Health Counseling Programs: K-7. ASSESSMENT studies that provide an understanding of individual and group approaches to assessment and evaluation, including all of the following: a. historical perspectives concerning the nature and meaning of assessment; b. basic concepts of standardized and non-standardized testing and other assessment techniques including norm referenced and criterion referenced assessment, environmental assessment, performance assessment, individual and group test and inventory methods, behavioral observations, and computer managed and computer assisted methods; c. statistical concepts, including scales of measurement, measures of central tendency, indices of variability, shapes and types of distributions, and correlations; d. reliability (i.e., theory of measurement error, models of reliability, and the use of reliability information); e. validity (i.e., evidence of validity, types of validity, and the relationship between reliability and validity; f. age, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, language, disability, culture, spirituality, and other factors related to the assessment and evaluation of individuals, groups, and specific populations; g. strategies for selecting, administering, and interpreting assessment and evaluation instruments and techniques in counseling; Learner Outcomes and Methods of Assessment for PSY 544: Tests and Measurement CACREP Standard K-7a K-7b State Standard (WAC) 180-78A270-a(5) 02-1 K-7c K-7d K-7e K-7f 180-78A270-a(5) 09-3 11-7 K-7g 180-78A270-a(5) Learner Outcomes Students will demonstrate knowledge of historical perspectives concerning the nature and meaning of assessment. Assessment Exams Research paper Class group projects Students will demonstrate knowledge of Exams various methods of standardized and non- Research paper standardized assessment of individuals and Class group groups. projects Students will demonstrate knowledge of Exams statistical concepts, including scales of Research paper measurement, measures of central Class group tendency, indices of variability, projects distributions, and correlations. Students will demonstrate knowledge of Exams reliability and validity, the use of Research paper reliability information, and the Class group relationship between reliability and projects validity. Students will demonstrate knowledge of Exams how age, gender, sexual orientation, Research paper ethnicity, language, disability, culture, Class group spirituality, and other factors relate to projects assessment of individuals and groups. Students will demonstrate knowledge of Exams strategies for selecting, administering, Research paper 02-1 09-1 09-4 11-7 180-78A270-a(5) 09-1 09-3 09-4 11-1 11-7 interpreting, and utilizing assessment instruments and techniques in counseling, educational, and organizational settings. Class group projects Oral presentation Students will effectively communicate in written and oral formats understanding of the psychometric properties of assessments and the principles behind appropriate selection, administration, interpretation, and presentation of unbiased and relevant assessment results to colleagues, students, families, and the community. Research paper Class group projects Oral presentation