CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismicity s School of the Environment Semester 1 Examinations 2006 - 2007 CNM16 SOIL DYNAMICS AND SEISMICITY Instructions to Candidates: Time allowed: TWO hours Answer THREE questions only out of FIVE Data sheets and graph paper supplied Friday 26 January 2007 9:30-11:30 hours Page 1 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismicity Question 1 (a) Briefly describe the principles of the reflected and refracted seismic survey techniques. (6 marks) (b) The geometry of a two layer problem is shown below, Soil density 1 seismic velocity v1 H Rock density 2 seismic velocity v2 Derive the following expression relating the depth H of the upper layer in terms of the p-wave velocities v1 and v2 for each layer and the critical distance xc for the simultaneous arrival of the direct and refracted (head) waves. H xc 2 v2 v1 v2 v1 NB: Snell's law sin ic = v1/v2 and cos2ic+sin2ic = 1 where ic is the critical incidence angle. (10 marks) (c) A seismic refraction survey was performed to determine the thickness of a surficial layer of soil over competent bedrock. The results are tabulated below. Geophone Distance of geophone from shot location (m) p-wave arrival time (msec) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 10 20 30 40 50 55 57.5 60 From these data calculate: (i) the p-wave velocities for each layer (ii) the thickness of the surficial layer of soil Page 2 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismicity (17 marks) Question 2 (a) Briefly explain how a recurrence law is established and how it can be used to estimate the return period of an earthquake greater that a certain magnitude. (8 marks) (b) Earthquakes have been recorded over a 175 year period. From all available data, it appears that the earthquakes have been distributed as follows: MOMENT MAGNITUDE 3–4 4–5 5–6 >6 NUMBER OF EARTHQUAKES 1790 200 15 3 (i) By plotting the tabulated data derive the Gutenberg-Richter recurrence relationship for the region. (9 marks) (ii) What is the probability that at least one earthquake of magnitude greater than 5.5 in a 10 year period, and in a 200 year period, will occur? (8 marks) (iii) Determine the earthquake magnitude that would have a 10% probability of being exceeded at least once in a 50 year period. (7 marks) Page 3 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismicity Question 3 (a) Explain what is meant by the terms tangent modulus, secant modulus and equivalent linear soil model. (5 marks) (b) What limitations are associated with an equivalent linear soil model. (4 marks) (c) Data from a stress controlled triaxial test is presented in the table below. The test is conducted under undrained conditions such that the shear strain, a ), i.e = 1.5a Time (Secs) 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Deviator stress, q (kPa) 75 68 49 21 -9 -40 -62 -75 -73 -57 -32 0 21 56 72 75 Axial strain % 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.1 0.05 0 -0.05 -0.09 -0.12 -0.12 -0.09 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.11 From the experimental results plot the backbone curve for the soil and determine: (i) the secant shear modulus (G) and damping ratio for the test (10 marks) (ii) the secant and tangent shear modulii at 0.05% shear strain (9 marks) (iii) estimate the maximum shear modulus Go (5 marks) Damping ratio 1 Aloop 4 Atriangle Page 4 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismicity Shear stress = q/2 Question 4 (a) Explain briefly the following phenomena: (i) Flow liquefaction (ii) Cyclic Mobility (10 marks) (b) A site investigation of a container port showed 13 - 15m of clean sand (D50 = 0.29mm) with a permanent water table at about 2.4 m below ground level. The cone penetration tests (CPT) data for the site is tabulated below. Evaluate the liquefaction potential of the site if subjected to a peak acceleration of 0.15g. Plot the factor of safety against liquefaction with depth. Assume that the saturated weight of the soil is 18 kN/m3, and the stress reduction factor is as given in the table. (18 marks) Depth (m) 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5 (c) Normalised cone resistance qc1 (MPa) 6.5 5.7 5.2 4.9 5.1 6.3 6.9 7.6 rd .98 .97 .96 .95 .94 .93 .92 .91 What measures could be taken to reduce the liquefaction potential of the site described in (b)? (5 marks) Page 5 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity Question 5 (a) Briefly explain the four main steps involved in seismic hazard assessment, highlighting the difference between the Deterministic and Probabilistic approaches. (6 marks) (b) The site shown below in is located near 4 active seismic sources. The fault types have been classified as: Fault A Fault B Fault C Fault D Normal fault Strike-slip fault Strike-slip fault Reverse fault (i) Using an appropriate relationship (Wells and Coppersmith) determine the likely moment magnitudes (M) for each fault or linear segment of fault (assuming only the linear segments may rupture at any one time). (6 marks) (ii) Using this information together with an appropriate attenuation relationship perform a deterministic seismic hazard assessment analysis and calculate the maximum peak horizontal acceleration that might occur at the site. (21 marks) (70, 50) Fault A (70,40) (0, 40) (20,30) Fault B (50,30) (0,20) (50,20) Fault C (62, 20) Site (60,15) (10,10) Fault D (40,0) (co-ordinates in km) Page 6 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity Data Sheet: SEISMIC HAZARD AND ATTENUATION RELATIONSHIPS Attenuation relationships Cornell et al. ln PHA (cm/s/s) = 6.74 + 0.859M - 1.80ln(R+25) M = Earthquake magnitude; R = Site to source distance. Empirical relationships between moment magnitude (M) and surface rupture length (L in km) Wells and Coppersmith Fault type Strike-slip Reverse Normal Relationship M = 5.16+1.12 log L M = 5.00+1.22 log L M = 4.86+1.32 log L Guttenberg - Richter Recurrence Law: log m = a - bM m = mean annual rate of exceedance: M = Earthquake magnitude PSHA: Poisson Model: The probability P[ ] of a random variable N, representing the number of occurrences of a particular event during a given time interval is given by PN n n e t n! where is the average number of occurrences of the event in the time interval If is the average rate of recurrence of an event (EQE) in the time interval t then t n e t PN n n! Page 7 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity The probability of occurrence of at least one event in the time period t is given by PN 1 P[ N 1] P[ N 2] P[ N 3] ... P[ N ] 1 P[ N 0] 1 e t P[ N 1] 1 e t Using a recurrence law to describe the rate of recurrence of a particular earthquake magnitude, then the probability of at least one exceedance in a period of t years is given by P[ N 1] 1 e mt GROUND RESPONSE Solution to shear beam equation Gazetas (1982), assuming power law variation of shear modulus. m z n ss n (4 m)( 2 m) G ( z ) Gb H 8 H n n th circular frequency Fundamenta l period Tm 16 H (4 m)( 2 m) m ss Values of n for first four modes of vibration of earth dam/embankment for Gazetas solution model n m 0 1/2 4/7 2/3 1 1 2.404 2.903 2.999 3.142 3.382 2 5.520 6.033 6.133 6.283 7.106 3 8.654 9.171 9.273 9.525 10.174 4 11.792 12.310 12.413 12.566 13.324 Page 8 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity SEISMIC REFRACTION For horizontal strata Depth to refractor, z z xc 2 v2 v1 v2 v1 where xc is the cross-over point for direct and critically refracted arrivals Time Travel time curve Distance xc Page 9 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity For dipping strata (refractor surface) Angle of incidence of critically refracted ray 1 v v c sin 1 1 sin 1 1 2 v v d u Angle of dip of strata (refractor) 1 v v sin 1 1 sin 1 1 2 v v d u v1 = seismic velocity in layer 1 vd = apparent down dip seismic velocity vu = apparent up dip seismic velocity Page 10 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity LIQUEFACTION Seed and Idriss (1971) Simplified Liquefaction Evaluation Method cyc 0.65 a max v rr g cyc CSRL v' L CSRL = critical stress ratio for liquefaction Magnitude stress correction factors for Cyclic stress approach Magnitude M 5.25 6 6.75 7.5 8.5 CSRM/CSRM=7.5 1.5 1.32 1.13 1 0.89 Page 11 of 12 CNM16 Soil Dynamics and Seismcity Page 12 of 12