Number AS90711 Version 1 Page 1 of 2 Achievement Standard Subject Reference Health 3.4 Title Examine contemporary dilemmas or ethical issues in relation to hauora/well-being Level 3 Subfield Health and Physical Education Domain Health Education Registration date Credits 21 October 2003 5 Assessment Date version published External 21 October 2003 This achievement standard involves examining contemporary dilemmas or ethical issues from differing perspectives and the implications of these on the hauora/well-being of self, others and society. Achievement Criteria Achievement Achievement with Merit Achievement with Excellence Examine contemporary Examine contemporary Examine, in depth, dilemmas or ethical issues dilemmas or ethical issues contemporary dilemmas or from differing perspectives. from differing perspectives. ethical issues from differing perspectives. Examine possible implications of the differing perspectives on the hauora/well-being of self, others and society. Examine, with supporting evidence, possible implications of the differing perspectives on the hauora/well-being of self, others and society. Examine, in depth and with supporting evidence, possible implications of the differing perspectives on the hauora/well-being of self, others and society. Explanatory Notes 1 This achievement standard is derived from Health and Physical Education in the New Zealand Curriculum, Learning Media, Ministry of Education, 1999; Level 8 achievement objectives from strands A, C and D. 2 Assessment will be consistent with, and reflect the underlying concepts of, hauora, health promotion, a socio-ecological perspective and the attitudes and values of: a positive and responsible attitude to the well-being of self respect for the rights of others care and concern for other people in the community social justice. Number AS90711 Version 1 Page 2 of 2 3 Dilemmas or ethical issues arise from the different perspectives individuals or groups have on health-related issues and include topics such as: legalisation/decriminalisation of cannabis abortion adoption the sex industry euthanasia reproductive technology elective plastic surgery pornography parental rights and the treatment of children. 4 Examine includes both explanation and analysis. Explanation and analysis of implications for each perspective may include: identification of the significance or importance of the issue/implications positive and/or negative factors and short-term and/or long-term impacts. The explanation/analysis must be justified by reasoned argument. 5 Examine in depth will require students to do one or more of the following for each of the different perspectives: explore the complexities of situations develop reasoned arguments present accurate and detailed supporting evidence. 6 It is important that students present a balanced view of the different perspectives of each dilemma or ethical issue. They will not be required to personally support or justify their position on any issue. Quality Assurance 1 Providers and Industry Training Organisations must be accredited by the Qualifications Authority before they can register credits from assessment against achievement standards. 2 Accredited providers and Industry Training Organisations assessing against achievement standards must engage with the moderation system that applies to those achievement standards. Accreditation and Moderation Action Plan (AMAP) reference 0226