Prevalence of painful diabetic neuropathy chapter currently

advertisement
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE - Theses Submission Form
Please fully complete every field unless indicated – (the boxes will expand as you type).
Please ensure you put as much detail as possible, this will enable us to upload your thesis correctly
Your Name
(as you are registered with
the University)
Your Permanent
Address
Contact email
(personal preferred)
Contact telephone
Amir Aslam
4 Prominence Park SW
Calgary, Alberta
CANADA
T3H 4K8
AmirAslam@hotmail.com
+15873542647
Files
List the file names and
suffixes to be uploaded
(Ensure they are emailed
with this form)
Title
The title of your thesis as
displayed on the title
page
1. Thesis submission form
2. THESIS Prevalence and treatment of painful diabetic
neuropathy.pdf
3. 1.Aslam V2 Diabetes and primary care.pdf
4. 2.Pathogenesis of PDN (Pain Research journal) - Copy.pdf
5. 3.Clin Diabetes-2014-Aslam-26-7.pdf
6. 4.AslamNov2013 (2) (1).pdf
7. 5.DOLSAslam.pdf
Prevalence and treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy
Abstract
Abstract
Please write a brief
description of your work,
or copy an abstract you
have included in the
Thesis
The prevalence of diabetes is rising globally and, as a result, its associated
complications are also rising. Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is a wellknown complication of diabetes and the most common cause of all
neuropathic pain. About one-third of all diabetes patients suffer from PDN.
The reported prevalence of PDN varies from 11% in Rochester, Minnesota,
USA to 53.7% in the Middle East. One UK study, published in 2011,
reported that the prevalence of PDN was 21.5% in type 2 diabetes patients
and 13.4% in type 1 diabetes patients, resulting in an overall prevalence of
21%. Numerous studies have found cardiovascular risk factors—including
increased age, longer duration of diabetes, higher weight, smoking, poor
glycaemic control, renal impairment and high cholesterol—to be
associated with PDN. This disorder has a huge effect on people’s daily lives
both physically and mentally. Despite huge advances in medicine, the
treatment of PDN is both challenging for physicians and distressing for
patients. In this thesis, three studies were carried out on the following
topics: prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy, PDN
patients’ quality of life, and treatment employing lignocaine.
This first study assessed the prevalence of painful diabetic neuropathy
(PDN) and its relationship with various cardiovascular characteristics in
diabetes subjects. This was done through an observational study of
diabetes subjects in Northwest England, UK (n =204). The self-completed
Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs questionnaire was
sent by post to the subjects and used to diagnose PDN. Consent for
participation and access to blood results was given by the study
participants. Ethical approval for the study was also granted by National
Research Ethics Committee UK. The results of the study showed that the
crude prevalence of PDN among subjects was 30.3%. The prevalence of
type 2 diabetes subjects was higher (33.1 %) than that of type 1 diabetes
subjects (14.1%). There was a significant association of obesity, smoking
and height in males with PDN compared to the non-PDN group (P <0.05).
The results also showed a significant trend of increasing PDN prevalence
with duration of diabetes, increasing HbA1c and increasing BMI (P<0.05).
There was a trend of increasing prevalence with age as well (P>0.05);
however, due to the small sample size, the data was not statistically
significant. There was no relationship of PDN with systolic or diastolic
blood pressure, nephropathy, alcohol intake or blood cholesterol (P>0.05).
These results highlight the importance of better control of modifiable
factors, including smoking, glycaemic control (HbA1c) and obesity.
The second study assessed the impact of painful diabetic neuropathy on
quality of life (QoL), mood and anxiety by comparing patients suffering
from painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN group) with diabetes patients not
known to have PDN (control group, C). The study used short form (SF) 36
and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS Scale) questionnaires.
For the PDN group, 25 adult subjects (mean age 56, standard deviation
(SD) +/- 11 years, male 15, female 10) were randomly selected from
patients attending the painful diabetes neuropathy clinic at Chorley
Hospital. For the control group, 25 adult diabetic subjects (mean age 56,
SD +/- 14 years, male 14, female 9) were randomly selected from patients
undergoing General Practitioner Surgery. Both groups completed the
HADS and SF36 questionnaires. Subjects in the PDN group had significantly
lower SF36 summary scores in both the physical health (P ˂0.0001) and
mental health domains (P= 0.026) compared with the C group. HADS data
showed that 56% subjects in the PDN group could be diagnosed anxiety
compared to only 20% in the C group (P=0.018); and 60% of the PDN group
received the diagnosis of depression compare to 44% in the C group
(P=0.396). The results also show that PDN was significantly associated with
impaired QoL, both physically (p<0.0001) and mentally (p<0.026). Anxiety
was significantly associated with the PDN group compared to control
(p<0.018), and depression was 16% more prevalent in PDN group than in
the control group.
The final study assessed the efficacy of lignocaine infusion as a treatment
for PDN in challenging cases where conventional treatment had not
helped. A total 11 patients participated; 7 patients were referred from the
pain clinic (non-PDN group), and 4 were referred from the foot clinic (PDN
group). All were given lignocaine infusion as a treatment for chronic pain.
Participants from both groups were on multiple pain medications with
minimal results. All participants gave consent for participation and filled
out a McGill short form (SF) questionnaire before and after lignocaine
infusion. The results showed a 33% reduction in the visual analogue pain
score after lignocaine infusion in PDN group compared to an 11%
reduction in the non-PDN group. The data were statistically significant
(P<0.05). Similarly, there was significant (p<0.05) reduction of affective
pain score: 41% after lignocaine infusion in PDN group, compared to 21%
in non-PDN group. In contrast, no significant difference was seen between
groups for the sensory pain score reduction after lignocaine infusion: 23%
in PDN group compared to 17% in non-PDN group (P>0.05). None of the 11
patients reported adverse effects from the treatment and their
observations were within normal limits throughout the lignocaine infusion.
Overall, the study showed that lignocaine infusion is effective and safe in
reducing the chronic intractable pain when conventional treatments are
intolerable or unhelpful. The treatment is also more effective for painful
diabetic neuropathy than for other forms of chronic pain.
Qualification level
e.g. Masters, Doctoral
Masters
Qualification name
e.g. MSc, MA, MPhil,
PhD etc
MSc
Creator
Your full name
Amir Aslam
School
The University School
you are registered to
Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences
Number of pages
Insert number of final
pages to thesis
176 + Publications papers PDF files attached in the end.
(5+8+2+1+3=19)
Total: 176 + 19= 195
Sponsor’s or funder
Projects
Keywords
Subject heading
MeSH Heading
Open Access archive
Opt-Out
(see also over
Rights/FOI
restrictions)
Publications
Sponsor’s of funders
name e.g. research
councils, or NHS etc.
write N/A if none
Write project name/title
if related to any specific
funded project on thesis
These words or phrases
will be what other
researchers will use to
find your work.
Separate each new term
with a ;
Overall subject area of
your thesis if known e.g.
Science, Zoology,
Education etc
Medical subjects only – if
known e.g. Science,
Zoology, Education etc
Tell us any reason that
access to your thesis
should be restricted. You
may request an embargo
if Open Access Archiving
will prejudice your
interests, or if your work
:
- contains large quotes
of text, code or music,
images or diagrams,
- is related to a patent
application, - is
covered by
confidentiality or
publication agreements

Has this thesis formed 
the basis of any
publications, if so please
list the bibliographic
references.

N/A
N/A




Diabetes
Painful diabetic neuropathy
Impact of painful diabetic neuropathy on quality of life
Lignocaine infusion as a treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy
in challenging cases.
Medicine
Medicine
N/A
Aslam A, Singh J, Rajbhandari S (2014). The impact of painful diabetic
neuropathy on quality of life. Diabetes & Primary Care; 16(4):212-219
Amir Aslam, Jaipaul Singh, and Satyan Rajbhandari, “Pathogenesis of
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy,” Pain Research and Treatment, vol. 2014,
Article ID 412041, 7 pages, 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/412041
A Aslam, J Byrne, SM Rajbhandari. Abdominal Pain and Weight Loss in
New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes. Clinical Diabetes: 2014, 32(1); 26-27
Prevalence of painful diabetic neuropathy chapter currently under review
in Canadian journal of diabetes
Comments
A space for any other
information or queries,
confidentially of thesis
etc.
In submitting this thesis by email to ResearchDegrees@uclan.ac.uk I confirm I have read and concur with The
Deposit Agreement and the End User Licence Agreement and completed the Freedom of Information Conditions of
Restriction if applicable (overleaf).
DEPOSIT AGREEMENT
COVERED WORK
I would like to deposit my material in the University of Central Lancashire’s digital repository, known as CLoK. Research referred
to below as "Work" is covered by this agreement and when I deposit my Work, whether personally or through an assistant or
other agent, I agree to the following:
NON-EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS
Rights granted to the digital repository through this agreement are entirely non-exclusive. I am free to publish the Work in its
present version or future versions elsewhere. I agree that the University of Central Lancashire may electronically store, copy or
translate the Work to any medium or format for the purpose of future preservation and accessibility. The University of Central
Lancashire is not under any obligation to reproduce or display the Work in the same formats or resolutions in which it was
originally deposited.
DEPOSIT IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE’S DIGITAL REPOSITORY
I understand that work deposited in the digital repository will be accessible to a wide variety of people and institutions including automated agents - via the World Wide Web. I understand that once the Work is deposited, metadata will be
incorporated into public access catalogues. This citation to the Work will always remain visible, although the author retains the
right to update the Work. Removal of the item can be made after discussion with the digital repository administrators.
I AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
- That I have the authority of the authors to make this agreement and to hereby give the University of Central Lancashire the
right to make available the Work in the way described above.
- That I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the Work is original, and does not to the best of my knowledge does not
breach any laws including defamation, libel and copyright.
- The University of Central Lancashire does not hold any obligation to take legal action on behalf of the Depositor, or other rights
holders, in the event of breach of intellectual property rights, or any other right, in the material deposited.
Freedom Of Information Conditions of Restriction Statement
INFORMATION AND CHOICES FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS OPTIONS
The University of Central Lancashire is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000. This Act gives a general right of access to
all information held by the University, including information held in CLoK As a matter of normal practice we will only make your
material available in accordance with the restrictions you have placed upon it. However, if someone specifically asks to see it,
we must give them access unless the material qualifies for an exemption under the Act. Please indicate which of the following
exemptions may apply to your material (if any) and explain why:




The material is due for publication shortly (please state date expected and the journal title)
Release of the material would prejudice substantially the commercial interests of any person
The material includes information that was obtained under a promise of confidentiality, or, is subject to Data Protection
Other (please specify)
If someone asks to see your material, we will use this information to decide whether we can refuse the request.
End User Licence Agreement
HUMAN READABLE: END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 Licence.
You are free:
- to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work
- to make derivative works
Under the following conditions:
Attribution.
You must give the original author credit.
Non Commercial.
You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
Share Alike.
If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a licence identical to this one.
For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the licence terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be
waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above.
To view the full text of this licence visit;
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/deed.en_GB
Download