Serial no.:
UNIVERSITI TEKNIKAL MALAYSIA MELAKA
FAKULTI KEJURUTERAAN ELEKTRIK
SUPERVISOR EVALUATION FORM ( FYP 2 )
STUDENT DETAILS
Name
: ……………………………………………………………………………..........
Matrix No.
:
Contact No.
:
Project Title
: ………………………………………………………………….……………….
Course
: ……………..……..
…………………………………………………………………………………..
Supervisor
: ……………………………………………………………………………..........
A-I. Project Implementation
10
Has significant progress in week 1-2 **
1
Has significant progress in week 3 -4**
1
Has significant progress in week 5-6 **
1
Has significant progress in week 7-8 **
1
Has significant progress in week 9 -10**
1
Has significant progress in week 11 **
1
Has significant progress in week 12 / Final decision to drop FYP2 if progress is not significant
1
Has significant progress in week 13 **
1
Has significant progress in week 14 **
1
Has significant progress in week 15 –
Submission of final report based on feedback by supervisor and panel.
1
TOTAL (A)
/10
** Significant progress MUST be recorded with DATE in student’s LOGBOOK. Significant
progress must be TANGIBLE. It could be presentation slides, CAD drawings, algorithm
flowcharts, actual codes, test procedure, simulation/experimental results with discussion,
diagrams, chapters of final report such as introduction, literature review etc.
Marks COULD NOT BE BACKDATED to help student gradually progress in their project.
Significant progress reflects student’s discipline, enthusiasm and ability to carry out task
independently.
Note: Advice student to DROP FYP2 if accumulated marks are less than 3 by week 8. BAR
from submission if accumulated marks is less than 5 by week 11
1/5
A-II. Turnitin Report
Note: Project report is rejected if Turnitin report is more than 30%. Proceed with
next evaluation ONLY if the percentage is less than or equal to 30%.
Accept
Reject
PROJECT REPORT
B-I. Report
B-1:Abstract
Note: Abstract is considered well describe if it is presented in brief with content
covering all necessary elements i.e. background of project, problem statement
and objectives, proposed idea, research methodology and expected results.
Abstract is well described
Abstract is moderately described
Abstract is poorly described
B-2:Motivation
Note: Motivation is considered well described if it is supported by facts and
figures and covering all necessary elements i.e. contribute to solve local or global
problem
Motivation is well described
Motivation is moderately described
Motivation is poorly described
B-3:Problem Statement
Note: Problem statement is considered well described if if covers all necessary
elements i.e. description of research variables, problem is complex, require the
use of fundamental engineering knowledge
Problem is well described
Problem is moderately described
Problem is poorly describe
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
B-4:Objective
Note: Objective is considered well describe if the covers all the necessary
elements i.e. specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time bound
Objective is well described
Objective is moderately described
Objective is poorly describe
B-5:Scope
Note: Scope is considered well if it describe the boundary of research in terms of
measurable outcome and research methodology
Scope is well described
Scope is moderately described
Scope is poorly describe
B-6:Literature Survey and Project Background
B-6a: Analysis of information
Note: Analysis means breaking information into smaller parts
Literature is well analyzed
Literature is moderately analyzed
Literature is poorly analyzed
2/5
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
B-6b: Synthesis of information
Note: Synthesis means deriving new information by integrating information.
Student could perform comparative study to find link, difference or change and to
find trade off.
Literature is well synthesized
Literature is moderately synthesized
Literature is poorly synthesized
B-6c: Evaluation of information
Note: Giving value to knowledge that is gain from literature
Literature is well evaluated
Literature is moderately evaluated
Literature is poorly evaluated
B-7:Methodology
B-7a: Validity
Note: Validity shows whether the evidence really provide the answer to the
research questions or the design requirement. Student should discuss validity in
terms of how the following items may invalidate the results. Design of
experiment, measurement, presentation of result, interpretation of result,
conclusion etc.
Methodology is correct, well described and most details are covered.
Methodology is acceptable but details are fairly covered
Methodology is acceptable but some details are missing.
Methodology is not acceptable.
B-7b: Reliability of data
Note: Reliability shows whether we can trust the measurement made during the
experiment/simulation? Reliability is well described if student discussed
influential factors such as the effect of error, uncertainties in making measured
variables
Reliability is well described
Reliability is moderately described
Reliability is poorly described
No reliability
B-8:Results
Analysis of information
Note: Analysis means breaking information into smaller parts
Results is well analyzed
Results is moderately analyzed
Results is poorly analyzed
B-8a: Synthesis of information
Note: Synthesis means deriving new information by integrating information.
Student could perform comparative study to find link, difference or change and to
find trade off.
Results is well synthesized
Results is moderately synthesized
Results is poorly synthesized
B-8b: Evaluation of information
Note: Giving value to knowledge that is gain from Results
Results is well evaluated
3/5
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
3
3
2
1
0
3
3
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
2
2
Results is moderately evaluated
Results is poorly evaluated
1
0
B-9: Conclusion and Recommendation
Note: Findings are clearly summarized, comments on achievement of objective
2
Project report is well concluded
2
1
0
Project report is moderately concluded
Project report is poorly concluded
TOTAL (B-I)
/30
STUDENT OVERALL PERFORMANCE
1.0
Project Implementation (A) – Supervisor
[10%]
2.0
Project Report Technical Content (B-I) –Supervisor
[30%]
3.0
Project Report Technical Content (B-II) – Panel 1
[30%]
4.0
Project Report Presentation and writing skills (C)
– Panel 1
[10%]
5.0
Seminar (D=D-I +D-II) – Panel 1 & Panel 2
[20%]
GRAND TOTAL
/100%
SUPERVISOR COMMENT/JUSTIFICATION
Hardware
Type of project
Software
Yes
Student final report is written in English
No
Student project has link with industry
Yes
If YES, please name the industry/company
No
…………………………………………………….
Yes
Student project has link with research grant
No
Comment:
4/5
…………………………………...……...
(Supervisor Signature)
Stamp
:
Ext. No.
: ………………………………...........
Date
: ………………………………...........
5/5