San Diego, March 2001 - Division of Analytical Chemistry

advertisement
Minutes
Division of Analytical Chemistry, 221st National ACS Meeting
DAC Executive Committee Meeting
Saturday, 31 March 2001, 1:00 – 5:00 pm
Hilton Gaslamp Quarter, Pacific Room, San Diego, CA
Present for all or part of the meeting: Bruce Chase, Ted Williams, Alan Newman, Sally
Stafford, Al Ribes, Carolyn Ribes, Henry Blount, Charlie Wilkins, Dick Henry, Andy
Zander, John Richardson, John Nikelly, Isaiah Warner, Rich Dallinger
1. 1. Call to Order- the meeting was called to order at 1:10 pm
2. 2. Approval of Minutes – the minutes of the August meeting were approved by
Carolyn Ribes, seconded by Stafford
3. 3. Officer Reports
3.1 3.1 Chair- Chase mentioned that the division appears healthy, but needs to look
at long range programming and continued support for awards. Newer people
should also be involved in the selection process.
3.2 3.2 Chair-elect- programming for this meeting includes 13 half-day sessions of
nine symposia. The symposia for Chicago were discussed. Co-sponsorship
options were discussed. Fenselau thanked Charlie Wilkins for his help with
symposia. She also mentioned that she wants to keep division dinners on the
inexpensive side as an effort to increase turnout. Blount mentioned that there has
been a precedent for sponsorship of the dinner, and this may be another means to
keep costs down. Hirsch mentioned that there should be co-sponsorship with the
Nuclear Division in Chicago, but Fenselau reported that this option is still under
negotiation.
3.3 3.3 Secretary- Richardson reported on the need for quick turnaround on the slate
for the upcoming division election. He noted that there will be a few changes.
First, a local printer will be used, and the deadline for receipt of ballots will be
extended. Both of these measures will be taken to help alleviate problems that
arose in the previous election.
3.4 3.4 Treasurer- Carolyn Ribes announced that the division had a surplus of about
$18,000 at the end of 2000. Much of this was due to timely receipt of award
funding from companies. We also appear to be ahead financially for 2001.
3.5 3.5 Councilors- Stafford reported that there is a petition to increase the size of
standing committees. While this may help even representation between local and
divisional members on committees, there is concern about efficiency. She noted
that there are many other ways to be active in ACS without being a member of a
committee, though Chase would rather see participation in Division activities.
Williams suggested a pool of people to call on for division service. This could
include newer people as well as more experienced people. Williams was willing
to look into this.
Another issue focused on whether applications of potential members with
associates degrees and five years of technical experience need to be reviewed by
the Membership Committee. The proposal is that people with these
qualifications will be able to bypass consideration by the membership committee.
The Division felt that these chemical technicians should be welcomed into ACS.
Also, there was concern about division representation vs. local section
representation on committees. There will be no action taken at this meeting, but
the issue is up for discussion. Stafford said that the real issue is cooperation
between divisions and sections. Blount suggested that the division offer products
and information to local sections to induce cooperation. Tour speakers could also
be cycled through local sections from the division as a service. Wilkins
suggested that such a program could increase the technical nature of the talks,
thus increasing interest in analytical chemistry.
Hirsch mentioned that there will be an on-line directory available as early
as next year. He also pointed out that ACS is making an effort to see that invoices
for symposia and other events will be sent out within two months of the meeting.
He noted that annual report evaluations will be available in advance of the next
executive committee meeting. Hirsch also commented on our increases in
membership, noting that we have the largest number of free and unpaid members.
There is also a proposal for an Automated Laboratory Division; action will be
taken in Chicago. Chase mentioned that this should increase our possibilities for
co-sponsorship of symposia. Stafford suggested that we should propose this form
of cooperation immediately to show support for the new division.
4. 4. Subdivision of Chromatography and Separations Science- Dick Henry introduced
himself as subcommittee chair. A current initiative is to improve the visibility of
separations topics at ACS meetings. Henry discussed the need to fund better speakers
to attract them to our symposia. He also reported that Vickie McGuffin has been
identified to run as Chair-elect of the subdivision. Henry mentioned that the ACS
meetings provide some excellent opportunities for co-sponsorship in separations
science that may not be available at other meetings, and these should be capitalized
upon.
5. Committee Reports
5.1 5.1 Program Planning- Wilkins reported the normal full slate of symposia. All
programming is in place for Chicago as well. He also commented that 2/3 of all
symposia are being chaired by women in Chicago. Funding options were
mentioned to symposium organizers, and these people were encouraged to seek
appropriate funding to cover speaker expenses. Work is progressing toward
determining appropriate symposia for Orlando. Regarding funding of symposia,
Carolyn Ribes noted that she, as well as Catherine Fenselau, should be made
aware of who is providing funding, as well as how much.
5.2 5.2 Awards and Canvassing- Chase announced the recipients of the upcoming
Division awards for 2001. He also announced a slightly different awards
symposium. Williams commented on canvassing for awards. He said that more
potential awardees are needed, and past nominees should be kept on file for three
years, but not longer. For most awards, we have more than enough nominees.
Fred Hawkridge will be thanked for all of his work regarding canvassing.
5.3 5.3 Directory- potential is there for a web-based directory. We also need a new
directory chair. Wilkins moved that there be an electronic directory; this was
seconded by Carolyn Ribes. Hirsch explained the process in a bit more detail,
such as how privacy issues will be dealt with. The motion carried. It was
suggested that some historical aspects of the division that were traditionally found
in the paper directory be included occasionally in the newsletter, as well as on the
webpage.
5.4 5.4 Education- Thea Barabarakis announced that there are nine Kolthoff
Awards at the San Diego meeting. She also suggested the need to identify
Kolthoff awardees in the listing for the poster session; this has been complicated
by OASys. This is an issue of timing; Kolthoff awards must be made before the
OASys system is closed and will be done by invitation. Barbarakis also
mentioned that there will be a Career Symposium for the 2002 Spring Meeting
centered on pharmaceutical analysis and biotechnology. Co-sponsorship will be
sought. Such career-related symposia would be done on a regular basis. Blount
suggested that there should be recognition of diversity in analytical chemistry.
This could be done as a full-day symposium at Pittcon or ACS that would
highlight diversity and the multidisciplinary nature of analytical chemistry.
5.5 5.5 Financial Planning- no report
5.6 5.6 Graduate Fellowship- Williams announced that the numbers and quality of
applicants have improved drastically. Five nine-month and seven summer
fellowships were awarded. Chase mentioned the need to continue to add to the
number of companies that could be sought for support. Rich Dallinger clarified a
few points, including the fact that there were more women applicants, but that
Perkin-Elmer has dropped its sponsorship. Also, the stipend size has been
increased to remain competitive with those offered by other sources.
5.7 5.7 Membership- no report
5.8 5.8 Newsletter- deadline for the spring newsletter is fast approaching. Al Ribes
encouraged people to meet this deadline and asked specific members of the
committee for contributions.
5.9 5.9 Web Page- Hirsch commented on the redesign of the webpage. He also
mentioned the need for potential help with the webpage given the disbandment of
Santasoft, the consulting firm that was updating the site.
5.105.10 Nominating- Williams reported that he has people identified to run for each
vacant office. He will have a full slate of officers by the middle of April.
5.115.11 Publicity- no report
5.125.12 Regulatory Affairs-no report
5.135.13 Undergraduate Awards- attached report.
5.145.14 FACSS-no report
5.155.15 EAS- Findeis Award; the problem of attendance at the award symposium
remains. Chase believes that the award must come back to the national ACS
meeting. A Hirsch/Wilkins motion that the award be moved was passed. Other
options remain for our division to support EAS. Blount suggested DAC
involvement in a career symposium (or other symposia) as an option. Chase will
offer this as an option to EAS.
6. 6. Reports from Affiliated Organizations
6.1 ACS Biotechnology Secretariat- no report
6.2 DAC-FECS- symposium on education in analytical chemistry in Cordoba, Spainthe Division has been asked to identify people as U.S. representatives who would be
willing to discuss this topic. Chase requested $1500 to support travel to this meeting;
a Wilkins/Hirsch motion was made in support of this. Fenselau questioned why we
should support this meeting given the number of European meetings focusing on
analytical chemistry. Newman supported this degree of interest in analytical
chemistry in Europe. Blount felt that the division may not be the best vehicle to
support this meeting, but rather a proposal to an agency focusing on international
education may be a better route to get funding to get people to this meeting. After
discussion, the Wilkins/Hirsch motion passed.
7. 7. Old Business- none was discussed
8. New Business
8.1 8.1 Report on Pacifichem- 18 half-day symposia and 66 speakers were supported
by the Division. $24,605 was actually spent on the meeting, all of which is
expected to be reimbursed to the division. Overall, the meeting was reported to
be a great success.
8.2 8.2 Request for Funding: Gordon Conference on Analytical Chemistry- this had
been approved in our last budget.
8.3 8.3 Long-range Program Planning- Chase emphasized the need for long-range
planning; continuity has been a problem in the past. We need a tapped pool of
people who can give suggestions on a regular, planned basis. Organizers are also
needed well in advance. Hirsch proposed a 9 member committee on staggered
three year terms to handle this. Membership, appointed by the current division
chair, would include the chair, the chair-elect, and past chair (normally acting as
committee chair), as well as six members to represent the interests of the
membership of the division. Terms will begin October 1st. This type of planning
could greatly increase our chance for co-sponsorship, funding, etc. Emphasis on
committee membership should focus on a broad representation of analytical
chemistry. The motion was seconded by Williams, and passed unanimously.
8.4 8.4 Awards Support- Williams (seconded by Carolyn Ribes) moved that if
division awards lose funding, the division will take on the funding for one year.
If no new funding source is found, the award will be abolished. The motion
carried. Blount suggested that past winners should be tapped to identify new
funding sources. Bill Heineman was suggested as a good starting point. Hirsch
made the point that nominations for the awards should continue to be sought in
the event that the funding can be found.
8.5 8.5 Division Dues- Carolyn moved (seconded by Hirsch) that no change be made
given the current financial health of the division. The motion carried. Also,
Hirsch (seconded by Warner) moved that a free first year of membership be
continued. This motion carried.
8.6 8.6 Name and Scope Change for CELL Division- Wilkins (seconded by Ribes)
moved that the Division support the change. The motion carried.
8.7 8.7 Adjournment
Minutes respectfully submitted by
John N. Richardson,
Secretary, Division of Analytical Chemistry, ACS
Download