López et al. 1 Supplementary Material and Methods 2 3 Cell lines and cell culture 4 5 The human melanoma cell line A375N was kindly provided by Dr. Medrano (Houston, 6 USA). 293 cells were purchased from Microbix (Toronto, Canada), while 911 cells were 7 courtesy of Dr van der Eb (University of Leiden, The Netherlands). Ovarian 8 adenocarcinoma cell lines OVCAR-3 (HTB-161), PA-1 (CRL-1572) and lung carcinoma 9 A549 (CCL-185) were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA). Ovarian adenocarcinoma 10 cell lines SKOV3.ip1, and OV-4 cells were obtained from Dr. Price, Dr. Wolf (both MD 11 Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA) and DrEberlein (Harvard Medical School, 12 Boston, MA). Firefly luciferase-expressing ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line SKOV3-luc 13 was kindly provided by Dr. Negrin (Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA). All the cell 14 lines were grown in the recommended medium supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine 15 serum (Natocor, Cordoba, Argentina), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 g/ml 16 streptomycin and maintained in a 37 °C atmosphere containing 5% CO2. 17 18 Construction and production of adenoviruses 19 20 In order to introduce the chimeric fiber 5/3, the entire cassette I-F512-E1Awt was extracted 21 from pAd-I-F512-E1Awt 1 with SpeI / SalI and subcloned in pShuttle-1 vector (Stratagene, 22 CA) in XbaI / SalI sites to obtain pShuttle-I-F512-E1Awt. The latter was digested with 23 PmeI enzyme and used for homologous DNA recombination with pVK500C 5/3 24 Escherichia coli BJ5183 by electroporation 3. One positive clone (pVK500-I-F512-E1Awt 2 in 1 López et al. 1 5/3) was selected, sequenced and amplified by transforming DH5eletromax cells 2 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) followed by DNA-maxiprep (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The 3 resulting plasmid pVK500-I-F512-E1Awt 5/3 was linearized with PacI, purified by ethanol 4 precipitation and transfected in 911 cells using LTX lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, 5 CA). The rescued adenovirus (AdF512wt) was used to infect 293 cells and produce the 6 stocks 1. 7 E1A mutants were obtained by PCR-based techniques using as template pGEM-T-E1Awt 8 (499-1632). The E1ARbmutant (1130bp) carrying the CR2 mutation 123-127 9 (corresponding to aminoacid residues TCHEA) was generated by a two-step amplification 10 procedure. First, a 430bp fragment was amplified using primers PRE5´ and DelE1Ar (Table 11 S4). A second fragment (700bp) downstream to the mutation region was amplified with 12 primers DelE1Afand PRE3´ (Table S4). Both products were mixed and used as templates 13 for a second PCR round with PRE5´/PRE3´ primers to obtain the E1ARb mutant. 14 To obtain the E1Ap300 mutation (amino acids 4-25, IICHGGVITEEMAASLLDQLIE) 15 the first round of PCR was carried out with primers delE1Ap300 5’/ PRE3’ Nhe (about 900 16 bp) and the second with primers delE1Ap300 Nco 5’/PRE 3´. Finally, the double mutant 17 E1ARbp300 was constructed using as templateE1Ap300 mutant and PRE5´/DelE1Ar 18 andDelE1Af/PRE3´primers set (Table S4) for the first round of PCR; then, both products 19 were mixed and used as templates for a second PCR round with primersdelE1Ap300 Nco 20 5’ / PRE 3´(Table S4). PCR products E1ARb, E1Ap300 and E1ARbp300 were 21 cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), to obtain pGEM-E1ARb, 22 pGEM-E1Ap300 and pGEM-E1ARbp300, respectively. Each E1A mutant was 23 released from pGEMs vectors with NcoI/NheI enzymes and subcloned into NcoI / XbaI 2 López et al. 1 digested pGL3-Basic vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The E1A mutants were 2 extracted with HindIII / SalI from pGL3-E1ARb, pGL3-E1Ap300 or pGL3- 3 E1ARbp300 and cloned into HindIII / SalI digested pShuttle-I- F512 vector. pShuttle-I- 4 F512-E1ARb, pShuttle-I-F512-E1Ap300 or pShuttle-I-F512-E1ARbp300 were 5 digested with PmeI enzyme and utilized for homologous DNA recombination with 6 pVK500C 5/3 to obtain AdF512v1, AdF512v2 and AdF512v3, respectively, each one 7 containing the different E1A mutants. Viral constructs were confirmed by restriction 8 pattern and automatic DNA sequencing (ABI PRISM 377 DNA Sequencer, Applied 9 Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Ad-SV40(Luc 5) and Ad-wt 5/3 were already described 1 1, 4 . 10 Ad-SV40(Luc 5/3) and Ad-F512(Luc 5/3) were prepared using pAd-SV40-luc 11 pAd(I)-F512-luc 1. The fragments SV40-luc and (I)-F512-luc were extracted from the 12 plasmid by digestion with SpeI / SalI enzymes and cloned into pShutlle-1 vector digested 13 with XbaI / SalI enzymes. The resulting plasmids pShuttle-SV40-luc and pShuttle-(I)-F512- 14 luc were used to obtain the corresponding viruses as described above. and 15 16 Immunoprecipitation 17 18 Ten g of antibody agarose conjugated rabbit anti-adenovirus-2 E1A protein 13 S-5 (Santa 19 Cruz Biotechnology Inc, CA), was added to 500 g of total cell proteins from cells infected 20 during 14 hours with Ad-wt 5/3 or AdF512v1, and incubated at 4°C overnight. The pellet 21 was collected by centrifugation, washed with RIPA, and subjected to 7% SDS 22 polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblottingwith rabbit anti-human Rb 23 C-15 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, CA). 3 López et al. 1 2 Western blot analysis 3 4 Twenty four hours after adenoviral infection at 1000 MOI, 1 x105 cells were scraped into 5 200 l lysis buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L tris (pH 7.5), 0.05% SDS, 1% Triton X- 6 100) and sonicated on ice. Protein (about 10 g) was electrophoresed on SDS- 7 polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter. Antibody binding (mouse 8 Anti-E1A sc-430, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, CA) was visualized using enhanced 9 chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). We used 10 -tubulin III as housekeeping (Anti-β-Tubulin III, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA). 11 E1A RT-PCR 12 13 Seven thousand A549 cells were infected at 1000 MOI and after 24 hours total RNA was 14 isolated by using TRizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). E1A transcripts were assesed by 15 semiquantitative RT-PCR using primers FE1A560 and RE1A1632 (Table S4). The 16 expression was normalized with actin (primers ACTBas and ACTBAse, Table S4). 17 18 Histology 19 20 For histology studies, samples were fixed in 10% neutral-bufferedformalin before paraffin 21 embedding and cutting of 8-µmsections. For immunohistochemical studies of SPARC 22 expression eight m-thick tumor sections were deparafinized in xylene and rehydrated in 23 graded ethanol. For antigen unmasking, sections were immersed in citrate buffer (pH=6) 4 López et al. 1 and boiled twice in a microwave oven. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 2 soaking the sections in 3 % hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 minutes. Non-specific 3 binding sites were blocked by incubating the sections in normal goat serum (10 % in PBS). 4 Excess serum was then removed and the tissue sections were incubated overnight with anti- 5 hSPARC antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 1/50 dilution. After washing 6 the slides twice in PBS for 10 min the sections were incubated with biotinylatedgoat anti- 7 mouse antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) at 1/400 dilution for 45 min, 8 followed by a PBS washing. The sections were subsequently incubated with Vectastain 9 ABC reagent (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 45 min. Color was developed 10 incubating the sections with liquid DiaminoBenzydine (substrate chromogen system, 11 DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA). Finally the sections were counterstaining with 12 hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted. 13 Flow cytometry 14 Cells (1 x 105/well MW6) were arrested in G0/G1 by serum starvation for 48 hours and 15 then maintain in 1 ml of D/F12 2% during two hours. After that, cells were infected at 500 16 of MOI in the same medium (non-infected cells were hold in D/F12 2% during this period 17 of time). After 4 hours the culture medium was added in a 2 ml volume (6.5% SFB, final 18 serum concentration of 5%). At 4 days cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and fixed in 19 70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. They were then washed with PBS, resuspended in PBS- 20 triton and treated with RNase (Sigma, San Luis, MO) and stained with propidium iodide. 21 Cell cycle status was analysed using FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, 22 Oxford, United Kinngdom). In all the cases 10000 events were measured in each analysis. 5 López et al. 1 2 References 3 4 5 6 1. Lopez MVn, et al.(2009). Tumor Associated Stromal Cells Play a Critical Role on the Outcome of the Oncolytic Efficacy of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses. PLoS ONE4: e5119. 7 8 9 2. Dmitriev I, et al. (1998). An adenovirus vector with genetically modified fibers demonstrates expanded tropism via utilization of a coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor-independent cell entry mechanism. J Virol72: 9706-9713. 10 11 12 3. Chartier C, Degryse E, Gantzer M, Dieterle A, Pavirani A, Mehtali M (1996). Efficient generation of recombinant adenovirus vectors by homologous recombination in Escherichia coli. J Virol70: 4805-4810. 13 14 15 4. Rivera AA, et al. (2004). Combining high selectivity of replication with fiber chimerism for effective adenoviral oncolysis of CAR-negative melanoma cells. Gene Ther11: 1694-1702. 16 17 6