Materials and Methods. (doc 87K)

advertisement
López et al.
1
Supplementary Material and Methods
2
3
Cell lines and cell culture
4
5
The human melanoma cell line A375N was kindly provided by Dr. Medrano (Houston,
6
USA). 293 cells were purchased from Microbix (Toronto, Canada), while 911 cells were
7
courtesy of Dr van der Eb (University of Leiden, The Netherlands). Ovarian
8
adenocarcinoma cell lines OVCAR-3 (HTB-161), PA-1 (CRL-1572) and lung carcinoma
9
A549 (CCL-185) were obtained from the ATCC (Manassas, VA). Ovarian adenocarcinoma
10
cell lines SKOV3.ip1, and OV-4 cells were obtained from Dr. Price, Dr. Wolf (both MD
11
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA) and DrEberlein (Harvard Medical School,
12
Boston, MA). Firefly luciferase-expressing ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line SKOV3-luc
13
was kindly provided by Dr. Negrin (Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA). All the cell
14
lines were grown in the recommended medium supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine
15
serum (Natocor, Cordoba, Argentina), 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 g/ml
16
streptomycin and maintained in a 37 °C atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
17
18
Construction and production of adenoviruses
19
20
In order to introduce the chimeric fiber 5/3, the entire cassette I-F512-E1Awt was extracted
21
from pAd-I-F512-E1Awt 1 with SpeI / SalI and subcloned in pShuttle-1 vector (Stratagene,
22
CA) in XbaI / SalI sites to obtain pShuttle-I-F512-E1Awt. The latter was digested with
23
PmeI enzyme and used for homologous DNA recombination with pVK500C 5/3
24
Escherichia coli BJ5183 by electroporation 3. One positive clone (pVK500-I-F512-E1Awt
2
in
1
López et al.
1
5/3) was selected, sequenced and amplified by transforming DH5eletromax cells
2
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) followed by DNA-maxiprep (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The
3
resulting plasmid pVK500-I-F512-E1Awt 5/3 was linearized with PacI, purified by ethanol
4
precipitation and transfected in 911 cells using LTX lipofectamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
5
CA). The rescued adenovirus (AdF512wt) was used to infect 293 cells and produce the
6
stocks 1.
7
E1A mutants were obtained by PCR-based techniques using as template pGEM-T-E1Awt
8
(499-1632). The E1ARbmutant (1130bp) carrying the CR2 mutation 123-127
9
(corresponding to aminoacid residues TCHEA) was generated by a two-step amplification
10
procedure. First, a 430bp fragment was amplified using primers PRE5´ and DelE1Ar (Table
11
S4). A second fragment (700bp) downstream to the mutation region was amplified with
12
primers DelE1Afand PRE3´ (Table S4). Both products were mixed and used as templates
13
for a second PCR round with PRE5´/PRE3´ primers to obtain the E1ARb mutant.
14
To obtain the E1Ap300 mutation (amino acids 4-25, IICHGGVITEEMAASLLDQLIE)
15
the first round of PCR was carried out with primers delE1Ap300 5’/ PRE3’ Nhe (about 900
16
bp) and the second with primers delE1Ap300 Nco 5’/PRE 3´. Finally, the double mutant
17
E1ARbp300 was constructed using as templateE1Ap300 mutant and PRE5´/DelE1Ar
18
andDelE1Af/PRE3´primers set (Table S4) for the first round of PCR; then, both products
19
were mixed and used as templates for a second PCR round with primersdelE1Ap300 Nco
20
5’ / PRE 3´(Table S4). PCR products E1ARb, E1Ap300 and E1ARbp300 were
21
cloned into pGEM-T vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), to obtain pGEM-E1ARb,
22
pGEM-E1Ap300 and pGEM-E1ARbp300, respectively. Each E1A mutant was
23
released from pGEMs vectors with NcoI/NheI enzymes and subcloned into NcoI / XbaI
2
López et al.
1
digested pGL3-Basic vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI). The E1A mutants were
2
extracted with HindIII / SalI from pGL3-E1ARb, pGL3-E1Ap300 or pGL3-
3
E1ARbp300 and cloned into HindIII / SalI digested pShuttle-I- F512 vector. pShuttle-I-
4
F512-E1ARb, pShuttle-I-F512-E1Ap300 or pShuttle-I-F512-E1ARbp300 were
5
digested with PmeI enzyme and utilized for homologous DNA recombination with
6
pVK500C 5/3 to obtain AdF512v1, AdF512v2 and AdF512v3, respectively, each one
7
containing the different E1A mutants. Viral constructs were confirmed by restriction
8
pattern and automatic DNA sequencing (ABI PRISM 377 DNA Sequencer, Applied
9
Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Ad-SV40(Luc 5) and Ad-wt 5/3 were already described
1
1, 4
.
10
Ad-SV40(Luc 5/3) and Ad-F512(Luc 5/3) were prepared using pAd-SV40-luc
11
pAd(I)-F512-luc 1. The fragments SV40-luc and (I)-F512-luc were extracted from the
12
plasmid by digestion with SpeI / SalI enzymes and cloned into pShutlle-1 vector digested
13
with XbaI / SalI enzymes. The resulting plasmids pShuttle-SV40-luc and pShuttle-(I)-F512-
14
luc were used to obtain the corresponding viruses as described above.
and
15
16
Immunoprecipitation
17
18
Ten g of antibody agarose conjugated rabbit anti-adenovirus-2 E1A protein 13 S-5 (Santa
19
Cruz Biotechnology Inc, CA), was added to 500 g of total cell proteins from cells infected
20
during 14 hours with Ad-wt 5/3 or AdF512v1, and incubated at 4°C overnight. The pellet
21
was collected by centrifugation, washed with RIPA, and subjected to 7% SDS
22
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblottingwith rabbit anti-human Rb
23
C-15 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, CA).
3
López et al.
1
2
Western blot analysis
3
4
Twenty four hours after adenoviral infection at 1000 MOI, 1 x105 cells were scraped into
5
200 l lysis buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L tris (pH 7.5), 0.05% SDS, 1% Triton X-
6
100) and sonicated on ice. Protein (about 10 g) was electrophoresed on SDS-
7
polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto a nitrocellulose filter. Antibody binding (mouse
8
Anti-E1A sc-430, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, CA) was visualized using enhanced
9
chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). We used
10
-tubulin III as housekeeping (Anti-β-Tubulin III, Sigma, St. Louis, MI, USA).
11
E1A RT-PCR
12
13
Seven thousand A549 cells were infected at 1000 MOI and after 24 hours total RNA was
14
isolated by using TRizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). E1A transcripts were assesed by
15
semiquantitative RT-PCR using primers FE1A560 and RE1A1632 (Table S4). The
16
expression was normalized with actin (primers ACTBas and ACTBAse, Table S4).
17
18
Histology
19
20
For histology studies, samples were fixed in 10% neutral-bufferedformalin before paraffin
21
embedding and cutting of 8-µmsections. For immunohistochemical studies of SPARC
22
expression eight m-thick tumor sections were deparafinized in xylene and rehydrated in
23
graded ethanol. For antigen unmasking, sections were immersed in citrate buffer (pH=6)
4
López et al.
1
and boiled twice in a microwave oven. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by
2
soaking the sections in 3 % hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 minutes. Non-specific
3
binding sites were blocked by incubating the sections in normal goat serum (10 % in PBS).
4
Excess serum was then removed and the tissue sections were incubated overnight with anti-
5
hSPARC antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) at 1/50 dilution. After washing
6
the slides twice in PBS for 10 min the sections were incubated with biotinylatedgoat anti-
7
mouse antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) at 1/400 dilution for 45 min,
8
followed by a PBS washing. The sections were subsequently incubated with Vectastain
9
ABC reagent (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 45 min. Color was developed
10
incubating the sections with liquid DiaminoBenzydine (substrate chromogen system,
11
DakoCytomation, Carpinteria, CA). Finally the sections were counterstaining with
12
hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted.
13
Flow cytometry
14
Cells (1 x 105/well MW6) were arrested in G0/G1 by serum starvation for 48 hours and
15
then maintain in 1 ml of D/F12 2% during two hours. After that, cells were infected at 500
16
of MOI in the same medium (non-infected cells were hold in D/F12 2% during this period
17
of time). After 4 hours the culture medium was added in a 2 ml volume (6.5% SFB, final
18
serum concentration of 5%). At 4 days cells were harvested, washed with PBS, and fixed in
19
70% ethanol at 4 °C overnight. They were then washed with PBS, resuspended in PBS-
20
triton and treated with RNase (Sigma, San Luis, MO) and stained with propidium iodide.
21
Cell cycle status was analysed using FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson,
22
Oxford, United Kinngdom). In all the cases 10000 events were measured in each analysis.
5
López et al.
1
2
References
3
4
5
6
1.
Lopez MVn, et al.(2009). Tumor Associated Stromal Cells Play a Critical Role on
the Outcome of the Oncolytic Efficacy of Conditionally Replicative Adenoviruses.
PLoS ONE4: e5119.
7
8
9
2.
Dmitriev I, et al. (1998). An adenovirus vector with genetically modified fibers
demonstrates expanded tropism via utilization of a coxsackievirus and adenovirus
receptor-independent cell entry mechanism. J Virol72: 9706-9713.
10
11
12
3.
Chartier C, Degryse E, Gantzer M, Dieterle A, Pavirani A, Mehtali M (1996).
Efficient generation of recombinant adenovirus vectors by homologous
recombination in Escherichia coli. J Virol70: 4805-4810.
13
14
15
4.
Rivera AA, et al. (2004). Combining high selectivity of replication with fiber
chimerism for effective adenoviral oncolysis of CAR-negative melanoma cells.
Gene Ther11: 1694-1702.
16
17
6
Download