UCM Teacher Education Teacher Work Sample A Teacher Work Sample (TWS) is a body of content (i.e., a unit of instruction) in one subject area for one class. The components of the TWS are: Contextual Factors, Learning Goals & Assessment, Design for Instruction, Analysis of Student Learning, and Reflection/Self-Evaluation. The TWS meets a state certification requirement. It allows the student teacher to provide evidence of meeting state standards including impact on student learning and reflective practice. The student teacher (in cooperation with his/her district supervisor(s) and university supervisor) should select a unit to be taught as well as a time frame for the unit. The TWS should not be seen as a separate component of student teaching. Instead it should be viewed as a means to document the student teacher’s daily participation in planning, teaching, assessing student progress, and self-evaluation. This document provides the prompts needed to complete the Teacher Work Sample. Please utilize the Blackboard TWS site for the scoring rubric, resources, examples of different components, and the PDF form by which to submit your completed work to be archived by the UCM Professional Education Unit. COVER PAGE – TEACHER WORK SAMPLE Student Teacher name:_________________________________________________________________ Major:______________________________________________________________________________________ Are you an MAT teacher candidate? ______yes _______no Are you an alternative certification candidate? _________yes _________no University Supervisor __________________________________________________________________ Grade level and content area used for Teacher Work Sample: ________________ 1. Contextual Factors TWS Component- What you must demonstrate: The teacher uses information about the learning-teaching context and individual student differences to set learning goals, design instruction, and plan assessment [MoSTEP 1.2.3]. This includes: • Knowledge of community, school, and classroom factors • Knowledge of characteristics of students • Knowledge of students’ varied approaches to learning • Knowledge of students’ skills and special considerations Task- What you must do: Complete this step of the work sample to gain detailed information about the community, school district, and classroom in which you are teaching. This will help familiarize you with your students as well as identify relevant factors and student characteristics that may affect the teaching-learning process. Forms should be submitted electronically. Prompt- How you must do it: Complete the form. You may find information about the district and building in which you will be student teaching at many websites including: http://www.dese.mo.gov/schooldata/school.data.html http://www.publicschoolreview.com/ www.city-data.com (lists cities with 6,000+residents) You may also find information at your district’s website. Additional information can be obtained from interviews with district personnel. Self-Evaluation- How you will be evaluated: (These are self-check questions and should NOT be separately answered in this section!) Do you display knowledge of the characteristics of the community, district, school, and classroom data by completing the context form? Do you display knowledge of student characteristics, skill levels, and special needs? Do you consider the instructional implications of these factors by discussing the possible impact of these factors on learning and teaching? 1. Contextual Factors Form Community/District Factors: State: ___________________ Area: _____ Rural _____Urban _____Suburban Community Population: ______________________ Socio-economic Profile: % of Population 25+ years with college education – ___________________ % Free/Reduced Lunch – ______________________ Racial/Ethnic Information: American Indian - __________% Asian - __________% Black - __________% Hispanic - __________% White - __________% Other - __________% Building Factors: Racial/Ethnic Information: American Indian - __________% Asian - __________% Black - __________% Hispanic - __________% White - __________% Other - __________% Free/Reduced Lunch - __________% Title I: _____ Yes ______ No Comment on the stability/transience of the student population (max 250 characters): Classroom Factors: Total number of students in the class described in this TWS: __________ (Student Teachers with multiple class sections will select one class to analyze for the TWS). Male - __________ Female - __________ IEP - __________ 504 - __________ ESL - _________ Free/Reduced Lunch - ________ American Indian - __________ Asian - __________ Black - __________ Hispanic - __________ White - __________ Other - __________ Briefly describe the following: physical aspects of the classroom, availability of technology, daily schedules, classroom rules/routines, parental involvement, and any district/state curricula standards that might impact your instruction. (Maximum of 1750 characters) Provide a brief summary of the characteristics of the students in the class (ages, gender, ethnicity, skill levels, special needs and considerations, etc.) (Maximum of 1250 characters) Give a concise overview of the instructional implications of these characteristics. (Maximum of 2500 characters) 2. Assessment and Learning Objectives TWS Component- What you must demonstrate: That the teacher sets significant, challenging, and appropriate learning goals and plans a variety of assessments to assess student learning of these goals before, during, and after instruction [MoSTEP 1.2.1, 1.2.4, 1.2.8]. The Task- What you must do: Provide the learning goals and objectives for the unit. Design an assessment plan that will be used to assess student learning and progress towards these goals before (pre-assessment), during (formative assessment), and after instruction (summative assessment). The assessments should be designed to authentically measure student learning and should include a variety of approaches (i.e. performance-based tasks, paper-and-pencil tasks, personal communication, and student selfevaluation/reflection.) Prompt- How you must do it: The learning goals and objectives, alignment, and assessment plan overview will be presented in provided table. Elements of Table List 1-4 learning goals (not the activities), clearly stated as learning outcomes, that will guide the planning, delivery, and assessment of your unit. o Learning Goals: Learning goals describe the large-scale aim of the unit. Goals of the unit should be overarching and reflect the big ideas of the unit. Learning goals are broad, generalized statements about what is to be learned (such as Show-Me Standards). List at least 1 learning objective for each learning goal. Minimum of 5 total learning objectives should be addressed in the unit. o Learning objectives: Learning objectives describe the student outcomes that indicate that the students have achieved the learning goals. Learning objectives answer the question, “What will students know and be able to do at the end of the unit?” Objectives are specific and measurable (such as GLEs and CLEs) and contain clear criteria. Provide the Depth of Knowledge (DOK) level at which each objective will be assessed. o Level 1 Recall: Recall of a fact, information, or procedure o Level 2 Skill/Concept: Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. o Level 3 Strategic Thinking: Requires reasoning, developing plan or a sequence of steps, some complexity, more than one possible answer. o Level 4 Extended Thinking: Requires an investigation, time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem Indicate how the lesson objectives are aligned with local (i.e., curriculum guides), state (i.e. Grade Level Expectations), or national standards (i.e. Common Core Standards, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards, etc.). For each learning objective, identify the assessments to be used Pre-assessment: There should be a pre-assessment for most to all of the objectives. The pre-assessment may take many forms (i.e., KWL, clicker responses, thumbs up/down, written pre-test). Think about how you will collect individual student data on each objective. o Formative assessment: assessment for learning. Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students' achievement of intended instructional outcomes. Occurs during instruction Does not need to be graded Focus is on process Provides descriptive Feedback Is continuous o Summative assessment: assessment of learning. Activities or tasks that determine whether students have mastered the material at a specified level. Includes analysis and use of data to make judgments about performance. Summative assessments include scoring criteria and documentation of performance. Think about how you will collect individual student data on each objective. Cross-index Learning Goals/Objectives to specific items in pre- & post-assessment Include the minimal level of performance you will use to determine if the student’s performance meets the learning objectives. o Self-Evaluation- How you will be evaluated: Questions for consideration (These are selfcheck questions and should NOT be separately answered in this section!) Clarity: Are all of the objectives clearly stated as learning outcomes? Appropriateness for students: Are objectives appropriate for the development; prerequisite knowledge, skills, experiences; and other student needs? Are the goals/objectives clearly aligned with identified standards? Do the assessments clearly align with instruction and gather information about student progress toward the objectives? Did you incorporate a variety of assessment modes and approaches? Page Length: Complete table; minimum 1 page, maximum 3 pages Appendix: Include in your unit plan copies of the assessments and scoring criteria used (scoring rubrics, observation checklist, rating scales, item weights, answer key, etc.). Table for Component 2: Learning objective and assessment plan table Overview of Assessment Plan Learning Goals: (list numerically) 1. 2. 3. Learning Objectives (list numerically – you can type more than one objective in each row if you need to) DOK Level Alignment w/ Curriculum Standards PreAssessment (Indicate Format) Formative Assessment List strategy(s) 1.1 1.2 2.1 3.1 3.2 [See BlackBoard for example of Assessment Plan Table] Summative (Indicate Format) Minimum level of performance (%) 3. Design for Instruction TWS Component – What you must demonstrate: That the pre-service teacher can design instruction for specific learning objectives, student characteristics and needs, and learning contexts [MoSTEP 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5, 1.2.6, 1.2.7, 1.2.11] Task - What you must do: Describe your unit instruction as it relates to unit goals, student characteristics and needs, and the specific learning context (see the Unit Plan and Lesson Plan directions for guidance in developing your unit). Prompts - How you must do it: Follow the prompts provided in order to describe your unit. Unit overview. Complete the table to provide an overview of your unit. Include the topic or activity you are planning for each day/period (may note if an activity will continue for multiple periods). Also indicate the objective or objectives (coded from your Learning Objectives section) that you are addressing in each activity. Make sure that every objective is addressed by at least one activity and that every activity relates to at least one objective. Results of pre-assessment. After administering the pre-assessment, analyze student performance relative to the learning objectives. Report the summary pre-assessment results in a manner that is easily interpreted (see BlackBoard resource page for examples). (300 words maximum) Activities. Describe three unit activities that reflect a variety of instructional strategies/techniques (300 words maximum, each activity; 900 words maximum). In your explanation for each activity, include: How the content relates to your instructional objective(s) Why the activity was chosen and any adaptations and accommodations made for student characteristics based on pre-assessment and contextual factors. What materials/technology you need to implement the activity Describe the rationale for your assessment choices during and following the activity (i.e., formative and summative assessment) Technology. Describe how you used technology in your planning and/or instruction. If you do not use any form of technology, provide your clear rationale for its omission (150 words maximum). Self Evaluation – How you will be evaluated: Questions for consideration (These are selfcheck questions and should NOT be separately answered in this section!) . Is the unit (and its lessons) aligned with learning goals? Are the lessons within the unit logically organized and usefully move students toward achieving the learning goals? Is there a variety of instruction methods, activities, assignments, and resources? Is the contextual information and data used to select appropriate and relevant activities, assignments and resources, including adaptations and accommodations made for student characteristics? Is technology appropriately used in both teaching and learning? Suggested Page Length: 4.5 pages (Maximum 8500 characters)+ table. Attach your unit plan including all lesson plans in the Appendix. Table for Component 3: Design for Instruction (Unit Overview) Lessons (Topics) Length of Time Activities Learning Goals & Objectives addressed 4. Analysis of Student Learning TWS Component- What you must demonstrate: The teacher uses assessment data to profile student learning and communicate information about student progress and achievement [MoSTEP 1.2.8]. Task- What you must do: Analyze your assessment data, including pre-assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments to determine students’ progress related to the unit learning objectives. Use visual representations and narrative to communicate the performance of the whole class, one subgroup, and one individual student. Conclusions drawn from this analysis should be provided in the “Reflection and Self-Evaluation” section. Prompt- How you must do it: In this section, you will analyze data to explain progress and achievement toward learning objectives demonstrated by your whole class, subgroups of students, and individual students. Whole class. In this section, describe and summarize the learning of the class as a whole on ONE learning goal (using ALL objectives related to that goal). The look of this section will vary depending on the nature of your data. Qualitative data should be described in pictures and words, and quantitative data in a table, graph, or chart. Include pre-assessment, formative, and summative data for each learning goal. Summarize what the information tells you about your students' learning in this unit (i.e., the number of students met the criterion). An example of qualitative data would be an image of actual student work in pre-assessment, formative assessment, and summative assessment. You would then choose to show a representative example from 2 different students. An example of quantitative data would be a score on a quiz, or a score on a rubric. You would summarize this data in a chart or graph. (600 words maximum + tables, images, etc.) Subgroups. Select a group characteristic (e.g., gender, performance level, socioeconomic status, language proficiency) to analyze in terms of one learning objective. Provide a rationale for your selection of this characteristic to form subgroups (e.g., girls vs. boys; high- vs. middle- vs. low-performers). Qualitative data should be described in pictures and words, and quantitative data in a table, graph, or chart regarding this learning goal. Summarize what these data show about student learning. (300 words maximum) Individual. Select one student that demonstrated significantly above- or belowaverage performance. Explain why it is important to understand the learning of this particular student. Use pre-, formative, and summative assessment data with examples of the student’s work to draw conclusions about the extent to which this student attained two learning objectives. Use samples of his/her work to support your discussion. (300 words maximum) Note: You will provide possible reasons for why your students learned (or did not learn) in the next section “Reflection and Self-Evaluation.” Self-Evaluation – How you will be evaluated: Questions for consideration (These are selfcheck questions and should NOT be separately answered in this section!) Is your analysis fully aligned with learning objectives/goals and provides a comprehensive profile of student learning for the whole class, subgroups, and one individual? Is the data interpretation meaningful, and appropriate conclusions are drawn from the data? Does your analysis of student learning include evidence of the impact on student learning in terms of number of students who achieved and made progress toward each learning objective/goal? Suggested Page Length: 4 pages (Maximum total 8000 characters) + charts and/or student work examples 5. Reflection and Self-Evaluation TWS Component- What you must demonstrate: The teacher uses ongoing analysis of student learning to make instructional decisions and analyzes the relationship between his or her instruction and student learning in order to improve teaching practice [MoSTEP 1.2.9]. Task- What you must do: Reflect on your performance as a teacher and link your performance to student learning results. Provide examples of instructional decision-making based on students’ learning or responses. Evaluate your performance and identify future actions for improved practice and professional growth. Prompt- How you must do it: Think about the unit you taught for the teacher work sample. Explain the process by which you put your Unit together. To what extent was it guided by professional goals/standards/objectives? How successful was your Unit plan in achieving your learning goals? How do you know if it was successful? Did your students find your Unit meaningful? How do you know? What are some examples of concepts/skills students learned during your Unit? Just because you taught it doesn’t mean they learned it, so what is your evidence that they learned it? What is one example of a lesson or activity from your Unit that worked well? What evidence do you have that is was successful? Why do you think it was successful? What is one example of a lesson or activity from your Unit that didn’t work well? What evidence do you have that it was unsuccessful? Why do you think it was unsuccessful? What should be done differently and why do you think it would improve the success? If you taught that Unit again, what would you change? Why would you change it? What is your evidence that it needs changing? What did you learn from teaching that Unit that will make you a more effective teacher? Reflection on possibilities for professional development. Describe at least two professional learning goals that emerged from your insights and experiences with student teaching. Identify two specific steps you will take to improve your performance in the critical area(s) you identified. Self-Evaluation: How you will be evaluated: Questions to consider (These are self-check questions and should NOT be separately answered in this section!) Do you use evidence to support conclusions drawn in “Analysis of Student Learning” section? Do you explore multiple hypotheses for why some students did not meet learning objectives/goals.? Do you plan adjustments based on analysis of student learning? Is there congruence between modifications and learning goals/objectives? Do you identify successful and unsuccessful activities and assessments and provide plausible reasons (based on theory or research) for their success or lack thereof? Are the learning goals/objectives, instruction, and assessment results in the discussion of student learning and effective instruction logically aligned? Do you provide ideas for redesigning learning goals/objectives, instruction, and assessment and explain why these modifications would improve student learning? Are a small number of professional learning goals presented that clearly emerge from the insights and experiences described in this section? Do you describe specific steps to meet these goals? Suggested Page Length: 3 (Maximum 6000 characters) APPENDIX AND DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMISSION OF YOUR FINAL TWS Detailed instructions for naming files, and for compiling and submitting your final TWS and appendices will be posted in Blackboard. Your University Supervisor may ask you to revise your TWS one or more times, or to submit drafts by sections; that is totally up to the USup’s discretion. Please do NOT submit your TWS to the Professional Education Unit until it has been scored and your USup says you are finished and ready to submit the final, complete version. All appendix items have been specified within each component/section of the TWS prompts. Below is a checklist for your convenience in assembling the final document. [Section 2 – Assessment & Learning Objectives] _______ copies of the assessments and scoring criteria used (scoring rubrics, observation checklist, rating scales, item weights, answer key, etc.) This is not a SEPARATE item but should be included in your Unit plan (see section 3, below) [Section 3 – Design for Instruction] _______ your complete Unit plan including all lesson plans [Section 4 – Analysis of Student Learning] _______ any charts or graphics displaying assessment data _______ student work samples (remember to choose these carefully from only 1-3 students—do NOT include every piece of paper completed by every child during the entire unit)