Sharon Armon-Lotem The Mental Lexicon The Mental Lexicon Readings Pastizzo, M.J. & L.B. Feldman. 2009. Multiple dimensions of relatedness among words: Conjoint effects of form and meaning in word recognition. The Mental Lexicon. 4(1): 1– 25 (Further reading can be: Carroll, D. W. 1986. Psychology of language. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company: 145-173) “People identify words and sentences … even though phonetic segments have no clearcut boundaries, have many different pronunciations, and correspond only indirectly to part of the speech stream itself. People hear speech as intelligible even though it is sloppy, and they can pick up the right speech stream from a number of competing ones.” Clark & Clark, p. 177 What is a word? Phonological word? Orthographic word? Semantic word? Lexical word? Grammatical word? How are words organized? What should be included in a dictionary? What should be included in the lexicon as part of linguistic theory? (1) a. John gave a book to Mary b. Mary received a book from John How is the internal mental lexicon similar to/different from a dictionary? What is the internal/mental lexicon? The internal/mental – The representation of words in permanent memory which includes, at least, meaning, syntactic information, relations to other words, extra-linguistic information, pronunciation and (for adults) spelling. What should a model of the lexicon represent and account for? Frequency effects Associations Relations (contrast, similarity, subordination, coordination, part-whole ….) Typicality (prototypes) Inferences (world knowledge) Retrieval (lexical access) Lexical ambiguity Sharon Armon-Lotem The Mental Lexicon (2) (3) a. The rabbi married my sister b. The rabbi married my brother c. The rabbi married my sister and her boyfriend Priming effect (e.g., Lexical decision, Semantic verification) a. A bat is a mammal b. A cat is a mammal c. A bat is a bird How is the mental lexicon organized? How are the words stored? How are they related to each other? A word is a bundle of features. A word is a part of a network. Hierarchical network (trees) – structural consideration: categorical relations. Each piece of information is stored at the highest possible level for economy. Semantic features (flowcharts + algorithms) – functional considerations: defining features (dictionary) and characteristic features (encyclopedia). Spreading activation (webs, networks) – Structural (e.g., categorical links) and functional (e.g., typicality) considerations. Extended Network Model (Bock & Levelt 1994) (Kazanina 2006, University of Ottawa) How are words retrieved (lexical access)? Word frequency Word structure Morphological structure Word prosody Lexical ambiguity 2 Sharon Armon-Lotem The Mental Lexicon Word frequency Logogens – bundles of features (semantic, phonological, etc.) A word detector is activated by the presence of the sensory features of a word. These features are counted and when it reaches the word’s threshold, the word is recognized. How would the logogen of apple respond to (1) the word apple? (2) the word banana? (3) the word book? Word structure Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita and S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. A lexical decision task. The target words were preceded by a very brief presentation (50msec) of another string of letter, which is masked, and so invisible to participants: USHER is preceded by "uhser" or "ushre". The influence of this masked word can be shown on response times. Morphological structure Are words stored as a whole unit or as its constituent elements? Taft and Forster (1975) – Lexical decision task: Devade vs. depoch Manelis and Tharp (1977) – sender vs. sister Rubin at al (1979) - Under vs. unlike (50% vs. 10%) What factors determine whether a word is stored as a whole unit rather than its constituent element? 3 Sharon Armon-Lotem The Mental Lexicon (Kazanina 2006, University of Ottawa) Regular vs. irregular forms • Hatched – HATCH • Fell – FALL • Went - GO Vs. Vs. A confluence of cues: Multiple dimensions of relatedness among words (Pastizzo and Feldman 2009) Swim – FLOAT (form) Coat – FLOAT (meaning) Boat – FLOAT (form and meaning) Can we predict the BOAT–FLOAT facilitation from the sum of facilitation the two dimensions of similarity? Experimental conditions • • • 1a - Non-masked 250 ms. Prime 1b - Non-masked 116 ms. Prime 1c - 500 ms. masked + 48 ms. Prime (+upper case target) Findings – Latency • • • 1a – Boat>Swim>Coat=Seed 1b - Boat>Swim>Seed>Coat 1c – Boat=Swim=Seed>Coat 4 Sharon Armon-Lotem The Mental Lexicon Cross-Model Priming Auditory prime, visual target Phonological priming (Marslen-Wilson & Zwiserlood 1985) Morphological decomposition & Semantic transparency Marslen-Wilson et al (1994): cross-modal priming Government – govern Apartment – apart Government facilitates its base govern Apartment does not facilitate its etymological base apart Longtinet al (2003) Gaufrette ‘little waffle’ - GAUFRE ‘waffle’ vignette ‘label’ - VIGNE ‘vineyard’ baguette ‘bread’ - BAGUE ‘ring’ abricot ‘apricot’ - ABRI ‘shelte Word prosody (no. of syllables, stress) Lindfield, K. C., A. Wingfield and H. Goodglass. 1999. The contribution of prosody to spoken word recognition. Applied Psycholinguistics 20: 395-405 Word initial cohort model Activation – Competition - Selection A word’s cohort is the set of items activated automatically by the initial phonemes. Word recognition occurs when the sensory information is enough to exclude other items in the cohort. Spoken words are recognized long before their full duration is heard. How does the word-onset gate technique show that word prosody must be used in defining the lexical cohort in spoken word recognition? 5 Sharon Armon-Lotem The Mental Lexicon Semantically related words, context and lexical ambiguity How does a sentence influence lexical ambiguity – why don’t we carry the ambiguity? BANK The meeting at the bank was very romantic The sailors tied the boat to the bank The clerk left the money at the bank All meanings are accessed briefly. The context provides cues priming one meaning over another. The sentence provides us with top-down constraints, while sensory information and frequency of meaning contribute to the bottom-up constraints. Words that have a strong relationship to one of the meanings disambiguate it. Automatic (spreading activation) vs. attentional processing (using conscious strategies). 6