1. Save this template to your school network or computer and alter it for your own assessment design or copy the information below into your school-based assessment instrument template. 2. Delete the information that is not relevant to your assessment, e.g. if the task is for Year 11, delete the Year 12 conditions. Information is provided in tables, so to delete, highlight the row you wish to remove, right click, and select Delete Rows. 3. Replace the red text with your school- and task-specific information. 4. Ensure all information has been completed, i.e. no red text remains. 5. Delete this instructional text. QCAA# 141010 Insert school-specific information, e.g. school name, logo Philosophy and Reason Assessment instrument: Examination — Short response test Typically consist of a number of items, which involve students responding to questions, diagrams, tables, statements, quotes, passages, articles. Occur under supervised conditions; students produce work individually and in a set time to ensure authenticity. Items will be in response to questions or statements which are typically unseen. If seen, teachers must ensure the purpose of this technique is not compromised. Stimulus materials may also be used and may be seen or unseen. Unseen questions, statements or stimulus materials should not be copied from information or texts that students have previously been exposed to or have directly used in class. Items may include activities that require: - explanations longer than one sentence - ideas maintained, developed and justified - full sentence responses, constructing a piece of prose that may have one or several paragraphs. Items may require students to construct, use, interpret or analyse primary or secondary data, graphs, tables or diagrams, exerts from text or philosophical statements, media messages, scholarly articles or hypotheses. Items may include multiple-choice and sentence answers. These types of questions, while useful for assessing content knowledge, are difficult to construct if trying to elicit meaningful higher order cognitive responses. Assessment instrument: Examination — Extended response test Require students to demonstrate sustained analysis, synthesis and evaluation in their responses. Occur under supervised conditions; students produce work individually in a set time to ensure authenticity. Students respond to stimulus (materials/sources/concepts) that may be seen or unseen, and a seen or unseen question or statement. In Year 12 the question will be unseen. When an extended response is chosen for an exam, it is best if it is the only item, as this will better allow students to demonstrate the full range of standards. Dimensions to be assessed This assessment technique is best used to determine student achievement in objectives from the dimensions: Knowledge and understanding Application and analysis Evaluation and synthesis. Assessment conditions: Short response test — Year 11 Recommended duration: Response length: Stimulus material: Questions/statements: 1.0–1.5 hours 50–250 words per response seen or unseen seen or unseen Assessment conditions: Short response test — Year 12 Recommended duration: Response length: Stimulus material: Questions/statements: 1.5–2.0 hours 50–250 words per response seen or unseen seen or unseen Assessment conditions: Extended response test — Year 11 Recommended duration: Response length: Stimulus material: Question/statement: 1 1.0–1.5 hours 400–600 words per response seen or unseen seen or unseen Assessment conditions: Extended response test — Year 12 Recommended duration: Response length: Stimulus material: Question/statement: 2 1.5–2.0 hours 600–800 words per response seen or unseen unseen 1. Replace the red text with your school- and task-specific information. 2. Make the standards instrument-specific. (Words may not be added to the standards except to specify the terminology, concepts, methods, principles and theories, procedures and techniques, ideas and information, arguments, ideas, arguments and theories, views and issues, conclusions, and audiences and purposes.) 3. The following words may be used in the singular: concepts, methods, principles and theories, procedures and techniques, ideas and information, arguments, ideas, arguments and theories, views and issues, conclusions, and audiences and purposes. 4. Ensure all information has been completed, i.e. no red text remains. 5. Delete this instructional text. Insert school-specific information (if required) 3 Instrument-specific standards matrix Knowledge and understanding Standard A Application and analysis Standard C Standard D Standard E The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: detailed and accurate accurate definitions and definitions and appropriate vague definitions or inaccurate definitions or definitions and effective use of terminology coherent and comprehensive explanation of relevant concepts, methods, principles and theories accurate execution of complex procedures and techniques of logic and reasoning use of well-chosen language conventions suited to purpose and audience. effective use of terminology comprehensive explanation of relevant concepts, methods, principles and theories accurate execution of procedures and techniques of logic and reasoning use of appropriate language conventions suited to purpose and audience. use of terminology explanation of relevant concepts, methods, principles and theories execution of basic procedures and techniques of logic and reasoning use of language conventions suited to purpose and audience. inappropriate use of terminology incomplete explanation of concepts, methods, principles and theories variable execution of basic procedures and techniques of logic and reasoning use of language conventions inappropriate use of terminology unclear explanation of concepts, methods, principles and theories inconsistent execution of basic procedures and techniques of logic and reasoning unclear or inconsistent use of suited to aspects of the purpose and audience. language conventions. The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: detailed and informed informed interpretation of interpretation of relevant ideas interpretation of basic ideas simplistic interpretation of interpretation of relevant ideas and information detailed and accurate deconstruction of relevant arguments into constituent parts insightful determination of significant relationships within and between ideas, arguments and theories coherent selection and logical sequencing of subject matter. 4 Standard B relevant ideas and information accurate deconstruction of and information deconstruction of relevant relevant arguments into constituent parts arguments into constituent parts informed determination of determination of relationships significant relationships within and between ideas, arguments and theories effective selection and sequencing of subject matter. within and between ideas, arguments and theories selection and sequencing of subject matter. and information deconstruction of arguments into some constituent parts determination of basic relationships within and between ideas, arguments and theories varied selection and sequencing of subject matter. basic ideas or information simplistic deconstruction of arguments simplistic determination of basic relationships within and between ideas, arguments or theories illogical or inappropriate selection and sequencing of subject matter. Evaluation and synthesis Standard A Standard C Standard D Standard E The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: The student work has the following characteristics: coherent and thorough coherent synthesis of ideas synthesis of ideas and superficial synthesis of ideas simplistic synthesis of some synthesis of ideas and information insightful evaluation of philosophical theories, views and issues sophisticated and thoroughly justified conclusions sophisticated arguments that thoroughly communicate meaning and points of view. 5 Standard B and information considered evaluation of philosophical theories, views and issues informed and well justified information evaluation of philosophical theories, views and issues conclusions with justification conclusions informed arguments that effectively communicate meaning and points of view. and information superficial evaluation of philosophical theories, views and issues plausible conclusions with some basic justification arguments that communicate meaning and points of view. superficial arguments that communicate meaning and points of view. ideas or information simplistic evaluation of philosophical theories, views and issues improbable or some simplistic conclusions simplistic arguments that communicate some meaning or points of view.