Excel Academy Charter (04100000)
Student Data for Proven Provider Analysis
Comparison District: Fall River
(Grades Compared: 5 - 8)
2013
70.5%
79.9%
51.6%
46.8%
51.3%
52.7%
47.3%
69.9%
78.4%
50.0%
45.4%
79.0%
51.9%
34.3%
31.6%
50.3%
77.1%
50.2%
33.9%
29.3%
48.4%
2011
2011
All
Asian
Afr. Amer./Black
Hispanic/Latino
Multi-race, non-Hisp./Lat.
White
Low-Income
ELL/Former ELL
Students w/disabilities
High needs
All
Asian
Afr. Amer./Black
Hispanic/Latino
Multi-race, non-Hisp./Lat.
White
Low-Income
ELL/Former ELL
Students w/disabilities
High needs
All
Asian
Afr. Amer./Black
Hispanic/Latino
Multi-race, non-Hisp./Lat.
White
Low-Income
ELL/Former ELL
Students w/disabilities
High needs
All
Asian
Afr. Amer./Black
Hispanic/Latino
Multi-race, non-Hisp./Lat.
White
Low-Income
ELL/Former ELL
Students w/disabilities
High needs
ELA Proficient or Higher
District
2011
2012
2013
State
2012
72.0%
46.9%
32.6%
47.6%
47.0%
45.6%
33.7%
48.6%
51.8%
39.4%
31.0%
77.7%
51.4%
35.8%
28.5%
49.5%
56.3%
46.2%
21.8%
15.3%
45.0%
52.1%
42.5%
11.7%
10.8%
41.6%
55.1%
42.9%
15.1%
11.2%
41.8%
State
2012
2013
MTH Proficient or Higher
District
2011
2012
2013
57.1%
78.3%
34.1%
33.7%
35.7%
31.2%
30.3%
55.3%
75.8%
31.1%
30.1%
61.8%
33.6%
28.0%
17.0%
32.1%
0.62324
33.8%
28.6%
16.7%
32.4%
55.2%
26.0%
23.7%
35.1%
41.0%
25.3%
22.0%
34.2%
38.9%
23.3%
20.3%
63.7%
36.6%
31.7%
17.7%
35.0%
39.2%
31.2%
18.6%
7.0%
30.4%
40.0%
30.4%
12.3%
7.7%
29.6%
39.7%
28.9%
14.1%
8.2%
28.4%
2011
State
2012
2013
ELA Median SGP
District
2011
2012
2013
50
50
50
47
46
47
47
47
48
44
48.5
45
50
46
50
44
47
50
46
52
44
47
50
47
54
44
48
48
47
47
38
47
45
45
56
36
45
48
46
53
43
46.5
2011
State
2012
2013
50
50
50
53
52
44
46
46
47
54
50
42
50
46
52
43
46
50
46
54
43
46
49
46
54
41
46
53
52
52
40
52
52
52
55.5
43
52
45
43
50
37
43
MTH Median SGP
District
2011
2012
2013
Additional Indicators 2012-13
State
District
Provider
Classes Taught by HQT (2012)
97.8%
94.1%
100.0%
Retention Rate
1.8%
3.6%
1.4%
In-School Suspension Rate (2012)
3.4%
7.5%
Out-of-School Suspension Rate (2012
5.4%
NA
Attrition Rate
2011
91.0%
NA
90.0%
88.7%
NA
97.4%
91.7%
71.4%
69.7%
89.2%
Provider
2012
88.5%
81.8%
72.7%
88.1%
NA
96.9%
88.2%
66.7%
72.7%
86.5%
2013
89.8%
100.0%
80.0%
90.9%
NA
84.2%
88.0%
80.0%
62.5%
87.4%
2011
94.8%
NA
90.0%
94.7%
NA
94.7%
94.3%
89.3%
78.8%
93.4%
Provider
2012
89.5%
90.9%
72.7%
88.7%
NA
96.9%
89.4%
75.6%
72.7%
87.6%
2013
83.7%
90.0%
60.0%
84.4%
NA
84.2%
81.4%
68.0%
52.5%
81.1%
2011
73
NA
NA
74
NA
70
75
91
67
75
Provider
2012
81
NA
NA
84
NA
80.5
84
90
71
83
2013
76
NA
NA
78
NA
64.5
78
80
79
78
2011
83
NA
NA
82.5
NA
85
82
94
87
83
Provider
2012
69
NA
NA
72
NA
68.5
74
91
60
73
2013
73
NA
NA
72
NA
76
75
75
58
75
State
District
Provider
94.8%
91.5%
97.9%
Average Days Missed
9.0
14.3
4.5
0.0%
Dropout Rate (2012)
NA
NA
NA
18.4%
13.3%
Mobility - Stability
95.6%
90.8%
91.2%
7.6%
5.6%
Mobility - Churn
9.0%
15.9%
10.0%
Attendance Rate
Notes:
1. Green shading for MCAS data indicates charter has +10% difference. Red indicates a -10% difference. Yellow is within (+/-) ten percentage point difference.
2. MCAS data for state and district include only the grade range served by the charter school. Additional indicators include all grades.
3. MCAS data are not reported for fewer than 10 students tested. SGP data are not reported for fewer than 20 students tested.
October 2013