Sci06-1 LAB Saturated Copper Sulfate Solution Gabriel

advertisement
SCIENCE 6 @ SWA
NAME:
To write your lab report you just add in the missing purple sections.
WHAT YOU HAND IN on Wednesday Feb 27:
A lab report with sections A, B, E, F,
G, H, J1, J4, K4
Done for you
Please fill these sections in
LAB: Make a Saturated Solution of Copper Sulfate
(in other words, How much copper sulfate powder can dissolve in 10 mL of water?)
Research Question: How many grams of copper sulfate will dissolve in 10mL of
water? We will answer this by adding a known mass of powder to the water until
no more can dissolve.
Equipment and Materials:





Test tube
Wax film
Test tube rack
Spatula
Measuring cylinder



Electronic balance
Copper sulfate powder
1 L beaker – kept at the teacher desk
Method:
1. Use the measuring cylinder to measure out 10mL of water.
2. Put this water into the test tube.
3. Put the square of paper on the balance and ‘zero’ the balance.
4. Put 3 spatula amounts of copper sulfate onto the piece of paper.
5. Record the mass of the paper with the chemical.
6. Carry the paper carefully to your workstation.
7. Add 2 spatula amounts of copper sulfate to the test tube from the paper.
8. Put the wax film on the test tube and shake the test tube.
9. Add more copper sulfate and shake.
10. Repeat step 9 using smaller amounts until copper sulfate remains undissolved, even after you shake the test tube a lot.
11. Measure the mass of the square of paper with the left over copper sulfate
that was not put into the test tube.
12. Record this mass.
13. Pour the blue crystals of copper sulfate back into the original beaker.
14. Measure the mass of the empty paper.
15. Record this mass.
16. Pour the saturated copper sulfate solution into the beaker at the teacher’s
desk.
17. Clean up your area.
Diagram of the method:
1. On a piece of blank paper, use your pencil and ruler to draw a labeled diagram
of the method.
2. Scan your picture.
3. Paste the scan here.
Hint: FOLLOW SECTION G on the sheet called ‘How to Write a Lab Report’.
SCIENCE 6 @ SWA
NAME:
Observations:
1. I have helped you with the quantitative observations so fill in my chart below.
2. You need to add qualitative data.
Hint: FOLLOW SECTION H on the sheet called ‘How to Write a Lab Report’.
The research question was how many grams of copper sulfate could 10mL of
water dissolve?
a
b
c
d
c
Mass of paper and copper sulfate at the end /g
Mass of paper alone /g
Mass of copper sulfate we had left at the end /g
Mass of copper sulfate we had at the start /g
Mass of copper sulfate we had left at the end /g
Mass of copper sulfate we used /g
2.05
1.2
0.85
6.00
0.85
4.00
The research question was how many grams of copper sulfate could 10mL of
water dissolve?
Before The electronic balance showed 6.00 grams on the scale
During We scooped up spoonfuls of copper sulfate into the beaker and shook
After
We repeated until it couldn’
Conclusion:
1. J1-The research question was how many grams of copper sulfate could
10mL of water dissolve? 10mL of water can dissolve 4.00g of copper
sulfate.
2. J4- Internet shows that 3.2g could be dissolved. The website with this
information is
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_copper_sulphate_can_you_dissol
ve_into_50ml_water_before_reaching_the_saturation_point
Evaluation:
3. 1. Follow K4. Even though you followed the method perfectly, errors
happened because the method was not perfect so you must make a table
to list all the things that make this method not perfect and how you would
improve it.
The weakness in the method
Results could have been affected by
shaking method always changing.
Did not specify what measuring
cylinder to get water with making it
harder to get 10ml.
Water leaked due to fact wax film was
not tightly sealed.
Beaker we used was too small.
How to improve it
Shake beaker in circle every time.
Use 25mL beaker as opposed to 50mL
beaker.
Push down tightly when placing wax
film.
Use a bigger beaker
SCIENCE 6 @ SWA
NAME:
Criterion D: scientific inquiry
Student’s Teacher’s SWA MYP Descriptor – Consistent with
Opinion Decision
the complexity of the work
0
1–2
The student does not reach a standard described
by any of the descriptors given below.
The student attempts to articulate a focused
problem or research question.
Task specific clarifications

My work does not match requirements below.


I tried to write a clear Aim.
I try to predict what will happen in the
experiment
I tried to identify the variables and explain
how they would be manipulated or controlled.
My method is incomplete.
My Evaluation is incomplete.
The students attempts to predict what will
happen in the experiment.

The student attempts to identify variables.


The method suggested is incomplete.
The student attempts to make comments on
the method.
The student articulates a problem or research
question.
The student makes a prediction related to the
concept investigated.
3–4
The student identifies some appropriate
materials and equipment and writes a simple
method, attempting to identify some of the
variables and controls involved and how to
manipulate and control them.





I define the aim of the experiment.
My hypothesis is partially developed.
I identify some of the variables and explain
how they are changed, measured, or kept
constant.
My method is mostly complete.
My evaluation includes one significant way to
improve this experiment
The student comments on the method.
The student attempts to suggest
improvements to the method.
The student articulates a problem or research
question (asks a question of type: “What will
happen if…?”, “Why does this happen when…?”)



The student makes relevant predictions. (“If I do
this, then this will happen.”)
The student identifies appropriate materials
and equipment, writes a simple method,
identifying the variables and controls and how
to manipulate and control them.
5–6
The student comments on the method and
quality of the data collected (asks questions of
type: “Is the method effective/workable?”, “Is
the data accurate?”)
The student makes comments on how the
outcome of the investigation helps to answer the
research question (asks questions of type: Is my
prediction/research question supported by the
data?”)
The student suggests relevant improvements to
the method.



I correctly defined the aim of the experiment.
My hypothesis is testable, is explained
scientifically, and is compared to the results.
I identify all variables and explain how they are
changed, measured, or kept constant.
My evaluation includes comments on how fair the
method was.
My evaluation includes comments on how accurate
and precise the results were.
My evaluation included at least two important ways
to improve this experiment.
SCIENCE 6 @ SWA
NAME:
Criterion E: processing data
Student’s
Opinion
0
1–2
3–4
Teacher’s
Decision
Task specific clarifications
SWA MYP Descriptor
The student does not reach a standard
described by any of the descriptors given
below.

My work does not match the requirements
below.
The student collects some data and
attempts to record it in a suitable format.

Some of my data is relevant and my
table/graph/drawings are partly correct
The student organizes, transforms, and
presents data using simple numerical or
visual forms with some errors or
omissions.

I tried to make a conclusion.

My data is relevant and recorded in a suitable
way.
I try to organize and process the data
My conclusion matches the observations
The student attempts to draw a
conclusion but this is not consistent
with the interpretation of the data.
The student collects sufficient relevant
data and records it in a suitable format.
The student organizes, transforms and presents data in numerical and/or visual
forms with a few errors or omissions.


The student states a trend, pattern or
relationship in the data.
The student draws a conclusion consistent
with the interpretation of the data.
The student collects sufficient relevant
data and records it in a suitable format.
The student organizes, transforms and
presents data in simple numerical and/or
visual forms logically and correctly.
5–6
The student states a trend, pattern or
relationship in the data and uses the data to
convey understanding.
The student draws a clear conclusion based
on the interpretation of the data and
answers questions of the type: “What
might have caused…? “How can we explain
what happened using what we know about
science?”
 My data is relevant and my presentation is
logical and clear.
 I correctly interpret the data.
 In my conclusion I comment on the reliability
of my data through comparing my results to
what would be expected from published data.
 I give a scientific explanation of my
conclusion.
SCIENCE 6 @ SWA
NAME:
Why I got what I got on my
Lab on Saturated Solution of Copper Sulfate
Student fills in the purple boxes please.
Student Name:
I followed the tips on how to write a lab report: YES ☐ NO ☐
I read the marking sheet while doing this lab report: YES ☐ NO ☐
On Criterion D called Scientific Inquiry, I got
out of 6.
Here is my plan for how to improve next time:
On Criterion E called Processing Data, I got
out of 6.
Here is my plan for how to improve next time:
Parent fills in the green box please.
Considerable time has been spent by student and teacher on this task with the goal of
student improvement.
Kindly glance through the comments on the task to gain an understanding of your child’s
progress with the skills we are developing.
To help me convince your child of the importance of learning from our mistakes
and successes, please encourage your child to give thoughtful comments above that
show they have read the advice I have written on their woirk.
Kindly print your name below AFTER you are satisfied with your
child’s reflection in the purple boxes.
Name of person at home who has seen this work:__________________
Relationship: ________________________
Comments/concerns always welcome to Jane Altemen at jane_altemen@swa-jkt.com
Download