Figure S1. Spatial autocorrelation for all individuals (not including identical genotypes, n = 84) at 0.2 km size classes between 0 – 2 km.
Significant values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.400%
0.40
**%
*%
0.30
0.300%
0.20
0.200%
0.10
0.100%
r"
r 0.00
0.000%
r%
U%
*%
-0.10
!0.100%
L%
-0.20
!0.200%
-0.30
!0.300%
-0.40
!0.400%
0.2%
0.2
0.4%
0.4
0.6%
0.6
0.8%
0.8
1%
1.0
1.2%
1.2
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
1.4%
1.4
Distance class (end point; km)
1.6%
1.6
1.8%
1.8
2%
2.0
Figure S2 Spatial autocorrelation for all individuals (not including identical genotypes, n = 84) at 2 km size classes between 0 – 20 km.
Significant values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.20
0.200&
*
0.15
0.150&
0.10
0.100&
0.050&
0.05
r&
r"
r
U&
0.000&
0.00
L&
!0.050&
-0.05
!0.100&
-0.10
!0.150&
-0.15
2&
2
44&
66&
8 8&
1010&
1212&
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
1414&
Distance class (end point; km)
16&
16
18&
18
20&
20
Figure S3 Spatial autocorrelation for all individuals (not including identical genotypes, n = 84) at 10 km size classes between 0 – 120 km.
Significant values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.200&
0.20
0.150&
0.15
0.100&
0.10
r&
r"
r
0.050&
0.05
U&
0.000&
0.00
L&
**
!0.050&
-0.05
!0.100&
-0.10
!0.150&
-0.15
10&
10
20&
20
30&
30
40&
40
50&
50
60&
60
70&
70
80&
80
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
Distance class (end point; km)
90&
90
100&
100
1 110&
10
120&
120
Figure S4. Spatial autocorrelation for males (not including identical genotypes, n = 28) at 2 km size classes between 0 – 20 km. Significant
values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.25
0.250&
*
0.20
0.200&
0.15
0.150&
0.10
0.100&
r
r"
0.05
0.050&
0.000&
0.00
r&
U&
-0.05
!0.050&
L&
!0.100&
-0.10
!0.150&
-0.15
*
!0.200&
-0.20
!0.250&
-0.25
2&
2
44&
66&
8 8&
1010&
1212&
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
1414&
Distance class (end point; km)
1616&
1818&
2020&
Figure S5. Spatial autocorrelation for males (not including identical genotypes, n = 28) at 10 km size classes between 0 – 120 km.
Significant values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.400%
0.20
0.15
0.300%
0.200%
0.10
0.100%
0.05
*
r"
r
r%
U%
0.000%
0.00
L%
!0.100%
-0.05
*
!0.200%
-0.10
!0.300%
-0.15
10%
10
20%
20
30%
30
40%
40
50%
50
60%
60
70%
70
80%
80
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
Distance class (end point; km)
90%
90
100%
100
1 110%
10
120%
120
Figure S6. Spatial autocorrelation for females (not including identical genotypes, n = 29) at 2 km size classes between 0 – 20 km between
0 – 120 km. Significant values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.400%
0.40
0.30
0.300%
*
0.200%
0.20
0.100%
0.10
r%
r"
r
U%
0.000%
0.00
L%
!0.100%
-0.10
*
!0.200%
-0.20
!0.300%
-0.30
2%
2
44%
66%
8 8%
1010%
1212%
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
1414%
Distance class (end point; km)
1616%
1818%
2020%
Figure S7. Spatial autocorrelation for females (not including identical genotypes, n = 29) at 10 km size classes between 0 – 120 km
between 0 – 120 km. Significant values are indicated by a star (* < 0.05, ** < 0.01, *** < 0.001).
Results"of"Spa8al"Structure"Analysis"
0.400%
0.40
0.300%
0.30
0.200%
0.20
0.100%
0.10
r 0.00
0.000%
r"
r%
U%
!0.100%
-0.10
L%
!0.200%
-0.20
*
!0.300%
-0.30
!0.400%
-0.40
10%
10
20%
20
30%
30
40%
40
50%
50
60%
60
70%
70
Distance"Class"(End"Point)"
80%
80
Distance class (end point; km)
90%
90
100%
100
1110%
10
120%
120
Figure S8. Graph showing change in relatedness as a function of number of microsatellite loci, estimated using RERAT [1]. Changes in
relatedness from additional loci is predicted using a trend line (power relationship, R2 = 0.999), and is shown in red.
Figure S9. Scatter plot of genetic verses geographic distance of okapi in the RFO
30
25
20
15
10
5
Genetic distance (Peakall & Smouse 2012)
(not including identical genotypes, n = 84).
Genetic distance vs geographic distance of okapi in the RFO
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Geographic distance (km)
1. Schwacke L, Schwacke J, Rosel P (2005) RE-RAT: relatedness estimation and
rarefaction analysis tool.