K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Report WP4-A11 Work package WP4 Activity A11 Title Create optimal model for energy and water management and the corresponding energy management to be a design guide for turbine system selection Work Month Planed Gantt chart Actual 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Schedule Work Team No Name Position 1 2 3 Dr. Mohamed El-Nemr Dr. Said Allam Eng. Mohamed Mamdouh Researcher Research Assistant Research Assistant Page: 1 Work Group TAN TAN TAN Main Task Literature Review and Modeling Literature Review and Modeling Literature Review and Modeling K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Contents Report WP4-A11 .......................................................................................................................... 1 Work package .......................................................................................................................... 1 Activity ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Title .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Schedule .................................................................................................................................. 1 Work Team .............................................................................................................................. 1 Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives .................................................................................................................................... 4 Descriptions ................................................................................................................................. 4 Preface ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Classifications of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator .................................................. 6 PM synchronous machines with different directions of flux path .............................................. 7 A. Radial Flux Permanent Magnet (RFPM) machine .......................................................... 7 B. Axial flux permanent magnet (AFPM) machine ............................................................. 7 C. Transverse flux permanent magnet (TFPM) machines ................................................10 PM synchronous machines according to PM mounting ........................................................10 A. Surface Mounted PM ...................................................................................................10 B. Interior Mounted PM ...................................................................................................11 C. Inset Mounted PM .......................................................................................................13 Page: 2 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Table of Figures Figure 1: Radial-flux PM-machine configurations ....................................................................... 7 Figure 2: Axial-flux machine configurations ................................................................................ 8 Figure 3: Layout of Torus ............................................................................................................. 8 Figure 4: Rotor structure of surface-mounted PM machine .....................................................11 Figure 5: Rotor structure of interior-mounted PM machine ....................................................12 Figure 6: V-shape rotor structure of buried-mounted PM machine .........................................13 Figure 7: Rotor structure of interior-mounted PM machine ....................................................13 Figure 8: Outer rotor structure of PM machine (Single external rotor and internal stator) ....14 Figure 9: Double rotor with internal toroidally wound stator ..................................................15 Figure 10: Matlab utility for PMSG dynamics simulation in generator mode.......................... 17 Figure 11: Matlab utility for PMSG dynamics simulation in generator mode .......................... 17 Page: 3 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Objectives Investigate the different configuration configurations of PMSG suitable for low speed applications with gearless coupling Descriptions The generator in wind energy systems is the main energy converter from mechanical energy into electrical energy. This project focuses on permanent magnet synchronous generators (PMSG). This type of generator has mainly six categories based on the arrangement of magnet distribution and geometrical properties. The researchers of Tanta University had performed a literature survey for the categories of PMSG and their geometries and performance characteristics. A three dimensional drawing library is produced to present different categories using Autodesk AutoCAD software. The surface mounted PMSG is nominated as a suitable candidate for manufacturing visibility. Dynamic model that present the load effect and voltage built-up process is developed using MATLAB software. Such model should conclude the information required for the successful cooperation between generator design team and energy-optimizer design team. Page: 4 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Preface Wind power is an energy source whose industrial application in the world has grown at the fastest rate in the last 10–15 years. Installed capacity of wind power plants is continuously growing at a level of annual rate exceeding 30%. The European power market has been the main driving force in development of wind power industry for many years. In EU countries, a record installation of more than 6,180 MW new wind power generators was achieved in 2005. By the end of 2005, the capacity of wind energy generation reached a level of more than 40,500 MW in Europe and more than 59,300 MW worldwide. In Europe, the current targets of using wind capacity are 75,000 MW by 2010, 180,000 MW by 2020, and 300,000 MW by 2030 [1]. Powerful grid-connected megawatt-scale wind generators, 0.5–5.0 MW per unit, are mostly manufactured and installed as pollution-free sources of renewable energy in the world in last years’. At the same time, many smaller wind turbines are required for certain installations and local consumption as maintenance-free independent power suppliers. A small-scale wind power turbine of the capacity 0.2–30 kW, with rotor diameters from 1 m up to 15 m may be used as a flexible and vital alternative for local power demand in isolated regions or locations [2-4]. Recent study shows a great demand for small to medium rating (up to 20 kW) wind generators for stand-alone generation-battery systems in remote areas. The type of generator for this application is required to be compact and light so that the generators can be conveniently installed at the top of the towers and directly coupled to the wind turbines [5]. Compared with a conventional, gearbox-coupled wind turbine generator, directly coupled generators have a series of advantages, such as a much reduced size of the overall system, a rather low installation and maintenance cost, a flexible control method, a quick response to the wind fluctuation and load variations, etc. However, a directly coupled generator needs to have a very low-speed operation to match the wind turbine speed and, at the same time, to produce electricity in a normal frequency range (30–80 Hz). According to the electric machine design principles, this implies a very bulky generator with a very big pole number [5]. Potentially, Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generators (PMSGs) offer a high efficiency in operation and a simple and robust structure in construction because no field current and winding are used. The attractiveness of PMSG generators is further enhanced by the availability of high-energy PM materials such as neodymium-iron boron [5]. As a result, many different configuration of PM generator have been developed and widely used. Permanent magnet (PM) synchronous generators are one of the best solutions for smallscale wind power plants. Low-speed multi pole PM generators are maintenance-free and may be used in different climate conditions [1]. It is possible to combine PM wind generators for hybrid technologies such as wind-diesel, wind-photovoltaic etc. Page: 5 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University The advantageous of PM machines can be summarized as follows: Elimination of copper losses in the rotor winding Higher efficiency, smaller size and lower weight It has no brushes or slip rings so it has the same simple and rugged construction as induction generator Since PMSG operate at synchronous speed there are no copper losses in the rotor and an increased efficiency of the order 5–10 % may be expected over induction generator PM on the rotor supply the field excitation and there is no need for external dc source for excitation On the other hand, the disadvantages of the PM machines are: High price of permanent magnet Variation of permanent magnet characteristics with time Strongly attractive nature of PM material tends to increase the difficulty of manufacture PM synchronous generator excitation constant which reduce the ability of controlling the terminal voltage High cost due the initial cost of PM (this cost is decreasing rapidly with the development of new PM material) The introducing of Samarium-Cobalt magnets in 1963 and Neodymium-Iron-Born magnets in 1983 has changed the technology of the building PM machines drastically. These materials offer extra ordinary PM characteristics. Therefore, they decrease the volume of the PM material inside the machines [6]. Classifications of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Generally, the stator of permanent magnet synchronous machine is structurally similar to that of the conventional synchronous machine, while, the rotor has permanent magnet instead of wire-wound fields and its associated slip-rings and brush gears. PM synchronous machines can be classified according to magnetization orientation (radial, axial or transverse), according to PM mounting (surface mounting, inset or interior mounting) or according to rotor structure (inner or outer). It should be noted that, the arguments are also typically overlapping and one special type may belong to different groups. The aim of this study is to compare different designs of Permanent Magnet (PM) synchronous generators for low speed applications. Page: 6 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University PM synchronous machines with different directions of flux path A. Radial Flux Permanent Magnet (RFPM) machine The Radial Flux Permanent Magnet (RFPM) machine is producing the magnetic flux in the radial direction with PMs. The design of Radial Flux (RF) machines is simple and widely used. The structural stability of RF machines is easy to make sufficient. Most of the low speed megawatts wind generators are RF machines and these RF machines seem to be the most interesting machine type for the large-scale direct-drive wind turbines. When using permanent magnets for the direct drive generators, the generators can operate with good and reliable performance over a wide range of speeds. In manufacture, the simple way of constructing the machine with high number of poles is gluing PMs on the rotor surface. In RFPM machines, the length of the stator and the air gap diameter can be chosen independently. If necessary, the radial-flux machine can be made with a small diameter by using a long stator. Fig. 1 shows two configuration of radial-flux PM-machine. RFPM machines have the advantages such as a better torque density than the RF Electrically Excited Synchronous Machine (EESM), so that these machines have been discussed in a number of literatures. However, the presence of PMs makes the assembly more difficult and the structure more strong, especially in large machines. Figure 1: Radial-flux PM-machine configurations B. Axial flux permanent magnet (AFPM) machine The Axial Flux Permanent Magnet (AFPM) machine is a machine producing magnetic flux in the axial direction. Several axial-flux machine configurations can be found regarding the stator(s) position with respect to the rotor(s) positions and the winding arrangements giving freedoms to select the most suitable machine structure into the considered application. Possible configurations of AFPM are shown in fig.2. Fig. 3 shows another configuration of AFPM named 'Torus' [7]. The Torus machine is a slotless, toroidal-stator, double-sided, axial-flux, disctype, permanent magnet, brushless machine. The name Torus was adopted to indicate the toroidal nature of both the stator core and the stator winding. AFPM machines built with 'Torus' topology give twice the torque density of RFPM machines. On the other hand, the thickness of the magnets used in 'Torus' machines makes the cost/torque twice that of RFPM machines with surface mounting magnets. Page: 7 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Figure 2: Axial-flux machine configurations (a) Single-rotor – single-stator structure (b) Two-rotors – single-stator structure (c) Single-rotor – two-stators structure, called hereafter also as AFIPM machine (Axial-Flux Interior rotor Permanent-Magnet machine) (d) Multistage structure including two stator blocks and three rotor blocks Figure 3: Layout of Torus Page: 8 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University The salient features of the Torus machine can be summarized as follows: The topology of the machine leads to a short axial length and thus to a high power-toweight ratio and makes it possible to integrate the generator directly with the wind turbine to form a very compact generating set. The disc rotors and magnets act naturally as fans, so good ventilation and cooling of the stator winding are achieved even at low rotational speed and hence the machine can operate with high electric loading. The slotless, air-gap winding gives low values of mutual and leakage inductances. The axially-directed end winding lengths are relatively short, yielding low resistance. Hence, the voltage regulation under load is acceptable for the application. The absence of the slots leads to a very low-noise machine with negligible cogging torque. Vibration and high-frequency rotor losses associated with stator slot opening are also eliminated AFPM machines have the advantages compared to RFPM machines as the following: Simple winding Low cogging torque and noise (in slotless machine) Allows construction of compact generator with large number of poles Higher torque/volume ratio They operate with similar magnetic flux density in all the magnetic circuit, which translate to better utilization factor for the magnetic core. Also the axial flux construction takes the advantage of the anisotropic characteristic of the oriented grain silicon iron Better efficiency However, the disadvantages of AFPM machines compared to RFPM machines can be summarized as the following. Lower torque/mass ratio Larger outer diameter, large amount of PM, and structural instability (in slotless machine) Difficulty to maintain air gap in large diameter (in slotted machine) Difficult production of stator core (in slotted machine) According to the survey on AFPM machines, a larger outer diameter, heavier mass than RFPM machine and complicated slotted machines construction must be taken into account. Therefore to apply AFPM machines in direct-drive application for large scale wind turbine, these Page: 9 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University disadvantages must be solved or even improved significantly, since those cause cost increase and difficult manufacture. C. Transverse flux permanent magnet (TFPM) machines The transverse flux (TF) principle means that the path of the magnetic flux is perpendicular to the direction of the rotor rotation. The major difference of TFPM machine compared to RFPM and AFPM machines is that TFPM machine allows an increase in the space for the windings without decreasing the available space for the main flux. TFPM machine can also be made with a very small pole pitch compared with the other types. The main advantages of TFPM machines can be summarized as follows compared to the longitudinal machines: Higher force density Considerably low copper losses Simple winding Contrary to the advantages, the construction of TFPM machine is more complicated compared to RFPM and AFPM machines, since TFPM machine has the flux path of three dimensions. TFPM machine with large air gap seems to be no more attractive because its force density is a little high or even low compared to RFPM machines. In contrast to axial-flux machines, which are manufactured almost exclusively with surface mounted magnets, several variations of assembling the magnets into the rotor of a radial-flux machine are possible and reasonable. PM synchronous machines according to PM mounting According to the location of the magnets in the rotor, the different configurations of permanent magnet synchronous machine can be classified. Mainly, there are three types of PM machines being used in the industry. They can be briefly defined as follows: A. Surface Mounted PM In this type, the PM materials are mounted on the surface of the rotor. The simplicity of building the rotor is one of the advantages of this machine type. Fig. 4 shows the rotor structure of the surface-mounted PM machine and the definitions for the direct (d) and quadrature (q) axes. Page: 10 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University (a) conventional surfacemounted PM South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University (b) surface-mounted PM with pole shoes Figure 4: Rotor structure of surface-mounted PM machine Surface-mounted structures are relatively simple to manufacture and assemble. If permanent magnets are glued on the surface of the rotor, the rotation speed of the machine must be limited so that centrifugal forces do not break the glue joint. In the case of low speed wind applications, centrifugal forces on the surface mounted PM are very low because the nominal speed is around 50 rpm. It is possible to improve the mechanical rigidity of the rotor structure by adding a reinforcing belt around the rotor. The reinforcement may be a carbon fiber or fiberglass band or a stainless steel cylinder. The first mentioned are, however, thermal insulators causing additional difficulties in the rotor cooling. A reinforcement cylinder obtained by using stainless steel involves a problem in terms of eddy currents since the material is conductive. A conventional surface-mounted PM structure is shown in fig. 4-a. Special arrangements may be used in order to obtain a sinusoidal air-gap flux density waveform as well as mechanical protection for the magnets. Rotor structure of surface-mounted PM machine with pole shoes is shown in fig. 4-b. B. Interior Mounted PM In this type, the PM materials are mounted (buried) inside the rotor. This method increases the durability of the machine but has hard manufacturing process. Fig. 6 shows the rotor structure of the interior-mounted PM machine and the definitions for the direct (d) and quadrature (q) axes. Page: 11 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (a) جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University (b) Figure 5: Rotor structure of interior-mounted PM machine The buried magnet configuration exists in several variants as shown in fig.6-a and fig.6-b. Although the rotor structure is somewhat more complex to manufacture it offers several advantages over the surface-mounted structure. The usual advantages of the buried magnet configurations compared to the surface PM designs are the possible flux concentration generated by the magnets in the rotor. The required magnet shape is a rectangular parallelepiped, which is simple to manufacture. No problems occur for the magnets to be fixed, consequently higher rotation speeds may be allowed without using additional reinforcements. It is possible to achieve a nearly sinusoidal air-gap flux density waveform and low cogging torque, which thus improves the torque quality. The demagnetization risk of the permanent magnets is reduced since the magnets are surrounded by ferromagnetic iron and fixed relatively far from the air-gap. The surrounding material also protects the magnets against mechanical impacts, wear and corrosion. As a disadvantage, the structure suffers from the increased leakage flux in the ends of the magnets since magnetic short-circuits may be formed due to the surrounding iron offers. The leakage fluxes can be reduced by means of proper flux barriers or material selections but leakage fluxes are difficult to diminish to a same level as in the case of a surface-mounted structure. It is also stated that the demolition and recycling of the materials of the machine is more difficult because it is awkward to remove the magnets from the rotor core. Considering this, the surface-mounted structure is a simpler construction [8]. The tangentially magnetized PM rotor, shown in fig. 6-b, presents the drawback of many iron and magnet pieces to be manipulated if the number of poles is high. Therefore, some production difficulties can arise. However, it does not present any bridges and the flux leakage is then very low. Another rotor structure of the buried-mounted PM machine, named V-shape is shown in fig. 7. The drawbacks of the rotors with V-shape magnets are the iron bridges that cause a high Page: 12 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University leakage flux. Furthermore, the V-shape rotor is not very adapted for high pole numbers. Indeed the higher the pole number, the smaller the place for the magnets in V-shape, and the smaller the angle between the two magnets. It can therefore easily get saturated between the magnets if the angle is too little. Another drawback of the V-shape configuration is the high number of magnets that increases the production cost [9]. Figure 6: V-shape rotor structure of buried-mounted PM machine C. Inset Mounted PM In this type, the PM materials are inset or partially inset into the rotor. The direct axes inductance is less than the quadrature axes inductance. Fig. 8 shows the rotor structure of the inset-mounted PM machine and the definitions for the direct (d) and quadrature (q) axes. Another property that differs between the investigated rotors is the saliency of the buried PM designs and of the inset PM designs. A reluctance torque can be produced in addition to the torque produced by the magnets. Fig. 8. Figure 7: Rotor structure of interior-mounted PM machine 2.1. PM synchronous machines according to rotor structure (inner or outer) Page: 13 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Most of the RFPM machines have a conventional inner rotor design but some outer rotor designs have also been presented in literature. The structure with external rotor and internal stator, known also as drum motor, is an alternative configuration and shown in fig. 9. Fig. 9. Figure 8: Outer rotor structure of PM machine (Single external rotor and internal stator) As can be noticed, the wound stator is stationary, located in the center of the machine while the magnets are mounted evenly along the inner circumference of the rotating drum. Several advantages can be identified easily from the illustrated outer-rotor structure, as follows [5]. The blades of the wind turbine can be conveniently bolted to the front face of the drum to realize the direct coupling between the wind turbine and the PM generator. Because of the enlarged periphery of the out-rotor drum, the multipole structure can be easily accommodated. Due to the multipole structure, the total length of the magnetic path is reduced. This not only effectively uses the PMs, but also offers a noticeable height reduction of the rotor yoke, resulting in a significantly reduced total volume and weight. The coil pitch equals the slot pitch so that the end winding is shorter, and correspondingly, copper loss is lower than those in a long pole pitch machine. Furthermore, with the ratio of the rotor diameter to the magnet width large enough, a minor air gap between the inner arc of the drum and the flat magnet surface will not be significant, resulting in a much simplified process of machining of the rotor yoke and mounting of the permanent magnets. Therefore, a small pole pitch and larger pole number is favorably accommodated by the outer-rotor structure, and a cost-effective, directly coupled PM generator can be made. In the actual design, all of the radially magnetized magnets are squarely shaped and evenly placed to the inner periphery of the rotor drum. While the generator is running, the centrifugal force of the magnets applies a pressure to the bonding media. Thus, the reliability of the glued joints becomes higher. Page: 14 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University As exposed to the natural wind flow, the outer rotor has a much reduced temperature rise than does the stator. Additionally, the simple outer rotor structure makes the PM generator compact, light, rugged, and easy to be installed at the top of a high tower. Recently, Qu et al., introduced a machine structure with toroidally wound internal stator and two rotors as shown in Fig. 10. The latter construction does not seem very practical since the mechanical structure is more complicated and the heat removal from the internal stator requires efficient air circulation inside the machine. The unique features of dual-rotor radial flux machine include very short end windings, high overload capability, balanced radial forces, low cogging torque and low material costs. Dual rotor radial flux machine is known for its high torque density and efficiency over induction and other permanent magnet machines. It has some meticulous features such as rotor-stator-rotor structure and double air-gaps due to unique mechanical configuration. As the output torque is proportional to the air-gap surface area for the constant electrical and mechanical loadings, torque density is improved. Since both the working surfaces of the stator core are used machine efficiency gets boosted up [8,9]. Figure 9: Double rotor with internal toroidally wound stator Page: 15 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University To allow productive cooperation the Tanta university group has developed a model that presents the dynamics of PMSG. The following few paragraphs presents the used model and the Matlab utility developed. Rs q - + Lls Rf Rkd Lmd + - Vd Llf Llkd Vfd Lls Rs d - + Rkq + - Vq Lmq Llkq 2 2 sin sin sin Va Vd 2 3 3 Vb V 2 2 3 cos cos cos q V 3 3 c d ( L ls L md ) i d L md ( i fd i kd ) q ( L ls L md ) i q L mq i kq t 0 ( t ) dt 0 Fig. 11: The PMSG in the rotor reference frame, including damper windings effect Page: 16 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University Figure 10: Matlab utility for PMSG dynamics simulation in generator mode a) q component of armature current b) developed terminal voltage c) Mechanical torque Figure 11: Matlab utility for PMSG dynamics simulation in generator mode 1. References [1] A. Kilk "Low-speed permanent-magnet synchronous generator for small-scale wind power applications", Oil Shale, 2007, Vol. 24, No. 2 Special pp. 318–331 ISSN 0208-189X © 2007 Estonian Academy Publishers [2] Grauers, A. Design of Direct-Driven Permanent-Magnet Generators for Wind Turbines // Technical Report no. 292, Chalmers University of Technology: Goteborg, Sweden, 1996. 133 pp. [3] Lampola, P. Directly Driven Low-Speed Permanent-Magnet Generators for Wind Power Applications // Ph.D. Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Laboratory of Electromechanics: Espoo, Finland, 2000. 62 pp. [4] 4. Kilk, A. Design and Experimental Verification of a Multipole Directly Driven Interior PM Synchronous Generator for Wind Power Applications // Proceedings of the 4th International Electric Power Quality and Supply Reliability Workshop: Pedase, Estonia, 2004. P. 87–89. [5] J. Chen, C.V. Nayar and L. Xu, “Design and finite-element analysis of an outer-rotor permanent-magnet generator for directly coupled wind turbines”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 3802-3809, September, 2000. Page: 17 K Science and Technology Development Fund Central Laboratory for Aquaculture Research جام ـ عة ك ـفر ال ش ـ ـ ـ ـ يخ afrelsheikh University Kafrelsheikh University South Valley University Colon University of Applied Sciences Tanta University [6] Asghar Abedini, “Integration of permanent magnet synchronous generator wind turbines into power grid,” Ph.D. dissertation the University of Wisconsin, December 2008. [7] B. J. Chalmers, W. Wu and E. Spooner, “An axial-flux permanent-magnet generator for a gearless wind energy system”, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 251-257, June 1999. [8] Parviainen, “Design of axial-flux permanent-magnet low-speed machines and performance comparison between radial-flux and axial-flux machines,” Ph.D. dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland, 2005. F. Libert and J. Soulard, “Design Study of Different Direct-Driven Permanent-Magnet Motors for a Low Speed Application”, in Proceedings of the Nordic Workshop on Power and Industrial Electronics (NORpie), Trondheim, Norway, June 2004. Page: 18