Iddo Landau—Publications
Books
Is Philosophy Androcentric? Pennsylvannia State University Press, 181 pages,
October 2006.
Articles
1a. ‘Early and Later Deconstruction in the Writings of Jacques Derrida’
(in Hebrew), Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 40
(1991): 159-172.
1b. ‘Early and Later Deconstruction in the Writings of Jacques Derrida’
Cardozo Law Review 14 (1993): 1895-1909.
2.
‘An Answer on Behalf of Gaunilo’, Philosophy and Theology 7
(1992): 81-96.
3.
‘Metafiction as a Rhetorical Device in Hegel’s History of Absolute
Spirit and Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ One Hundred Years of Solitude’,
CLIO 21 (1992): 401-10.
Reprinted in Jeffrey W. Hunter and Tom Burns, eds., Contemporary
Literary Criticism (Detroit: Thomas Gale, 2002), 322-337.
Reprinted in Harold Bloom, ed., Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s One Hundred
Years of Solitude (Philadelphia: Chelsea, 2003), 115-24.
4.
‘Thinking and Personal Existence: Does Descartes Succeed in Proving
that He Exists?’ Dialogos 63 (1994): 101-107.
5.
‘Should There Be Separatist Feminist Epistemologies?’ The Monist
77 (1994): 462-71.
6.
‘What’s Old in Derrida?’ Philosophy 69 (1994): 279-90.
7.
‘The Paradox of the End’, Philosophy 70 (1995): 555-565.
8.
‘Modernism, Postmodernism and Politics’, The International Journal
of Applied Philosophy 10 (1995): 39-45.
9.
‘How Androcentric is Western Philosophy?’ The Philosophical Quarterly
46 (1996): 48-59.
(A reply to this article is: Susan Mendus, ‘How Androcentric
is Western Philosophy? A Reply’, The Philosophical Quarterly
46 (1996): 60-66.)
10.
‘Mendus on Philosophy and Pervasiveness’, The Philosophical Quarterly
47 (1997): 89-93.
11.
‘Good Women and Bad Men: A Bias in Feminist Research?’ The
Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (1997): 141-50.
12a. ‘Why Has the Question of the Meaning of Life Arisen in the last
Two and a Half Centuries?’ Philosophy Today 41 (1997): 263-70.
12b. ‘Why Has the Question of the Meaning of Life Arisen in the Last
Two and a Half Centuries?’ (in Hebrew), in Asa Kasher (ed.)
The Meaning of Life (Tel Aviv: HaKibbutz HaMeuhad, 1999),
69-77.
13.
‘Are You Entitled to Affirmative Action?’ The International Journal
of Applied Philosophy 11 (1997): 17-22.
14.
‘Meister Eckhart on Temporality and the "Now": A PhenomenologicalHermeneutical Interpretation’, Annalecta Husserliana 52 (1997): 387-95.
15.
‘Feminist Criticisms of Metaphors in Bacon’s Philosophy of Science’,
Philosophy 73 (1998): 47-61.
16.
‘On the Definition of Sexual Harassment’, Australasian Journal of
Philosophy 77 (1999): 216-223.
17.
‘Is Sexual Harassment Research Biased?’ Public Affairs Quarterly 13
(1999): 241-254.
18.
‘Sexual Harassment as “Wrongful Communication”’, Philosophy of
the Social Sciences 33(2) (2003): 225-234.
(A reply to this article is: Edmund Wall, ‘Reply to Iddo Landau’,
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (2003): 235-41.)
19.
20.
‘Sexual Harassment and the “Repetition Requirement”’, Philosophy of
the Social Sciences, 34 (2) (2004): 79-83.
‘An Argument for Marriage’, Philosophy 79 (2004): 475-481.
(A reply to this article is: Dan Moller, ‘The Marriage Commitment:
Reply to Landau’, Philosophy 80 (2005): 279-84.)
21.
‘The Dialectic of Authenticity and Inauthenticity in Jesus of Montreal’,
Film and Philosophy 9 (2005): 113-125.
22. ‘The Law of Sexual Harassment’, Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (2005): 531-536.
23. ‘To Kill a Mandarin’, Philosophy and Literature 29 (2005): 89-96.
(A reply to this article is: Amihud Gilead, ‘Why Not Kill a Mandarin?’
Philosophy and Literature 31 (2007): 153-58.)
24. ‘Response to Amihud Gilead’, Philosophy and Literature 31 (2007): 158-161.
25. ‘Two Notions of Objectification’, Philosophy Today 51 (2007): 312-319.
26. ‘Haack on Preferential Hiring’, in Cornelis de Waal, ed., Susan Haack: The
Philosopher Responds to Her Critics (Amherst: Prometheus, 2007), 298305.
27. ‘Society, Culture and Philosophy’ (in Hebrew), Iyyun 57 (2008): 407-418.
28. ‘Problems with Feminist Standpoint Theory in Science Education’, Science and
Education 17 (2008): 1081-1088.
29.
‘On the Marginalization of Feminist Philosophy’, International Journal of
Philosophical Studies 18 (2010): 551-568.
30.
‘Violence and Postmodernism: A Conceptual Analysis’, Reason Papers 32
(2010): 67-73.
31.
‘Immorality and the Meaning of Life’, Journal of Value Inquiry 45(3) (2011):
309-317.
32.
‘The Meaning of Life Sub Specie Aeternitatis’, Australasian Journal of
Philosophy 89(4) (2011): 727-734.
(A reply to this article is: Joshua W. Seachris, ‘The Sub Specie Aeternitatis
Perspective and Normative Evaluations of Life’s Meaningfulness: A Closer
Look’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, forthcoming.)
33.
‘The Nights of Cabiria as a Camusian Existentialist Text’, Film and Philosophy
16 (2012): 53-69.
34.
‘Should Marital Relations Be Non-Hierarchical?’ Ratio 25(1) (2012): 51-67.
35.
‘Foundationless Freedom and Meaninglessness of Life in Sartre’s Being and
Nothingness’, Sartre Studies International 18(1) (2012): 1-8.
36.
‘Sartre’s Absolute Freedom in Being and Nothingness’, Philosophy Today 56(4)
(2012): 463-473.
37.
‘The Meaning of Life’ in The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Hugh
LaFollette, ed. (London: Wiley Blackwell, 2013), 3043-3047.
38.
‘Neurology, Psychology, and the Meaning of Life: On Thagard’s The Brain and
the Meaning of Life’, Philosophical Psychology, forthcoming.
(A reply to this article is: Paul Thagard, ‘Nihilism, Skepticism, and
Philosophical Method: A Response to Landau on Coherence and the Meaning
of Life’, Philosophical Psychology, forthcoming.)
39.
‘Coherentism, Brain Science, and the Meaning of Life: A Response to
Thagard’, Philosophical Psychology, forthcoming.
40.
‘Conceptualizing Great Meaning in Life: Metz on the Good, the True, and
the Beautiful’, Religious Studies, forthcoming.
41.
‘Perfectionism and Non-Perfectionism in Camus's Myth of Sisyphus’, in Beatrix
Himmelmann, ed., On Meaning in Life (Boston: De Gruyter, forthcoming).