docx - Global Network Architecture

advertisement
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document
GNA Network Services
Document name:
Author(s):
Contributor(s):
Date:
Version:
GNA Network Services
Erik-Jan Bos, Dale Finkelson, David Wilde, Gerben van
Malenstein
GNA Technical Team
26 October 2015
v0.9P
Table of Contents
1.
Introduction ................................................................................................... 1
2.
Definitions ..................................................................................................... 2
3.
Required Services ........................................................................................... 3
Deterministic Services .................................................................................................................................... 3
Non-Deterministic Services .......................................................................................................................... 4
Other Services .................................................................................................................................................... 4
4.
Service delivery .............................................................................................. 4
5.
Set-Up/Tear-Down Methodology ................................................................... 5
6.
Possible Implementation techniques .............................................................. 5
7.
Developing Innovation Services ...................................................................... 6
8.
Network Services not part of GNA .................................................................. 6
9.
Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 7
1. Introduction
The Global Network Architecture (GNA) is a blueprint for the intercontinental
network interconnections for R&E Networks around the globe. These R&E
Network organizations have agreed to align their investment strategies in order
to be able to jointly create a much more powerful set of network services with a
global reach. This is an inclusive effort, with the overall aim and goal to have a
better and more resilient network infrastructure for Research and Education, on
a global scale.
The implementation of the GNA will not be a big bang, but is expected to grow
gradually as more R&E Networks make investments along the lines of the ideas
from this activity. The resulting network could be known as the GNA
1
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document
Infrastructure for R&E (GIRE)1, and this term is used in this document but has
not yet been agreed.
Current thinking is that an initial set of GNA Network Services will be agreed
upon and be labeled GNA v1.0. An associated roadmap will plot the development
of v1.0 services and new services in time, leading to minor updates called v1.1,
v1.2, etc., and major updates v2.0, etc..
Technically speaking, GIRE is a set of contributed circuits landing on Open
Exchange Points, all subscribing to a set of commonly agreed principles. It is not
a standalone network, with one owner or one operator, and it should also not be
thought of as having a separate and dedicated AS Number being one routed
infrastructure. Rather, in the big picture, it is a shared substrate adhering to a
common set of architecture, operations, and security principles upon which
participants create the network services that interconnect them.
A core set of services will be available over this substrate. These services will
enable the GIRE participants to utilize the substrate for their networking needs,
e.g. by creating value-add network services on top of the substrate. This
document provides a description of the primitive network services available on
this substrate. It will also describe potential network services that may be
offered at a later date.
The physical infrastructure of GIRE consists essentially of a set of highperformance links and Open Exchange Points, jointly referred to as the (tangible)
architecture elements of the GIRE.
2. Definitions
The following set of terms are defined here and used in this document, and at a
later stage this is planned to go into a dedicated GNA Definitions document.

Link: A circuit or wavelength between two Open Exchange Points
made available for service implementation. A link may have a
policy associated with it, as set by the link owner.

Link Policy: A link may have requirements concerning how and to
whom bandwidth may be allocated, these requirements would be
expressed as policy.
Gire refers to gyre, which is “a ringlike system of ocean currents rotating
clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere and counterclockwise in the Southern
Hemisphere”.
1
2
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document

Link Owner: The entity that holds the contract for the link with the
carrier or fiber company. Link owners can also determine policy
on a link.

End-to-End Deterministic Service: Ability to deliver traffic end to
end in a manner that is determined by the classification of the
traffic and/or guaranteed by a well-defined set of parameters.

Service owner: The owner/responsible entity for a service.

Participant: Connectors and contributors will be Research and
Education Networks, such as national R&E Networks (e.g. AARNet,
SURFnet), Regional R&E Networks (e.g. RedCLARA, GÉANT
Association) and mission specific networks (e.g. ESnet).

Open Exchange Point: A location where physical links are
terminated, interconnection between participants is facilitated and
services are implemented in a policy free manner. Also, access to
the colocation site -in which the Open Exchange Point is located- is
available under non-discriminatory and fair conditions.
3. Required Services
There are a fairly small set of primitive or basic services that the substrate will
offer and thus that the exchange points will need to develop a means to
implement. How these are implemented could vary from location to location and
is not a primary concern of this document.
The reporting, operational expectations, and open statistics as described in the
GNA operations documentation, must be fully supported by the Open Exchange
Point operators.
Deterministic Services
I.
Guaranteed Bandwidth Service: A participating organization will be
allowed to specify some amount of bandwidth for guaranteed delivery. Each
participating organization may have some portion of each link – or set of links –
available to them for guaranteed delivery of flows.
II.
Guaranteed Bandwidth Service with Bursting Capabilities: This service is
based on the Guaranteed Bandwidth Service. It adds bursting capabilities. In this
case a network service has guaranteed bandwidth available and is also able to
exceed this bandwidth as long as there is additional Best Effort capacity available
to the service.
3
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document
Non-Deterministic Services
III.
Best Effort Service: All participating organizations are allowed to inject
traffic for best effort delivery without any restrictions on amount. Being best
effort this traffic may be eligible for drop during congestion, e.g. as a result of an
outage on another link, and thus not be delivered in any deterministic fashion.
IV.
Flow Separation: In some cases an organization may wish to have some
particular traffic separated from other traffic by means of a VLAN or other
technology. This is still Best Effort traffic. The separation may be for better
accounting on a specific application or other point-to-point activities.
Other Services
V.
Special Use Service: Any participating organization can request a fixed
amount of any link for a discrete period of time for a special event. Examples
would be requesting 80G over a specific (short) term to be used for application
demonstration at a conference or other event. Details of how these requests
would be approved are TBD. These requests may be either Deterministic or NonDeterministic.
4. Service delivery
The following services are expected to be delivered by the participating R&E
Network organizations to their constituencies, using the GNA substrate:
1.
Multi-point service
2.
Overlay services (like LHCONE): L2 / L3 / MDVPN / Content peering
3.
Point-to-point Anywhere-in-the-World2
4.
Monitoring & Trouble tickets (flowing back along provisioning lines
across multiple networks / verification)
5.
Tie into Compute & Tie into Storage (as part of the L3 overlay / towards
CDN service & caching)3
6.
Slicing (of OSS)
7.
Encryption & Certification on transport layer (P2P / P2MP / Overlay)
8.
Security Services / Forensics / Boundary DDoS mitigation
Parameters to be specified: Presentation such as Eth, Services Supported such
as QinQ, Capacity, Label swapping, VLAN retagging. This is expected to become
ultimately a service using ENNI ports between networks.
3 This needs discussions with these domains; two flavors are foreseen: NFV and
Dedicated.
2
4
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document
For each of these services, generic concepts will apply:
•
Verification of Services
•
Automation as much as possible
•
High-availability (resiliency)
Version Management for the GNA Network Services will be a key, as
A cookbook explaining what it means to be connected to the GIRE, and how a
new R&E Network is able to join will be developed as part of the discussions
going forward, and a first version of the GNA Cookbook will arise from these
discussions.
5. Set-Up/Tear-Down Methodology
All of the basic service types above will be available through the Open Exchange
Points. A feature that must be implemented by the Open Exchange Point
operator, on a per service basis, is automated service set-up and teardown. In
this instance a participating organization will be allowed to set-up a service type
for a certain period of time without the need for operator intervention. The
technology used for dynamic services will be open protocol and standards based.
At time of writing, the Network Services Interface (NSI) standardized by the
Open Grid Forum (OGF) will be a interdomain signaling standard for this type of
service.
6. Possible Implementation techniques
There are of course many means whereby these services could be implemented
and the way in which that is done may well change over time. The only real
constraint right now is that the exchanges must offer these services in such way
that they can interoperate with the organizations that are relying on the services
offered by the operators of the Open Exchange Points.
As an example, one means to offer the Best Effort Service may be using VLANs:
every exchange will need to have the ability to provide VLANs across their
switch infrastructure to enable packets to flow between participant ports. This
capability needs to support a range of Ethernet standards, such as the various
speeds all the way up to the highest current speed, QinQ and MAC-learning.
One way to offer the Guaranteed Bandwidth Service may be by use of
differentiated services: exchange points must support 2 or more classes of
service for individual packets within one VLAN. A Participant would mark
5
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document
packets tagged with this VLAN with 802.1p bits in the packet header thus
enabling prioritization.
Another use case that needs to be considered at some point may be the
availability of the non-guaranteed capacity on the links to the general R&E
community independent of their status as a Participant. This Commons capacity
may be made available to the general R&E community on the GNA substrate
without regard to whether the organization is a part of the GNA. How and to
what degree this is implemented will need to be discussed. This will allow for the
creation of a global peering fabric for R&E Networks (this is for further study at
this moment).
7. Developing Innovation Services
The services delivered by GIRE are not a static set, but rather will evolve as the
technology matures and as the requirements from the Participants and the endusers evolve. These networks do after all exist to meet the needs of the
community of users the Participants serve.
Virtualization services are currently under discussion while development has
been taking place for some time now.
As protocols like NSI, OpenFlow, and others become universally available across
Open Exchange Point platforms these will become more critical for production
services. This implies that Open Exchange Points would need to offer flow-based
services together in a unified way. The tools for this are still being developed and
implemented in some networks, while interoperability is a serious issue already.
It is anticipated that virtualization services join the list of required services any
time soon, after the GNA Technical Team has had time to work with software
architects.
8. Network Services not part of GNA
In this discussion it is also important to understand what are not GNA services:
These are capabilities enabled by the GNA services described in this document.
Working with the participating Open Exchange Point operators, and coordinated
through the Operations body for GIRE, the GNA Participants may create these
services over the GIRE, as their own value-added services.
These include but are not limited to:
6
GNA – Global Network Architecture
Web: http://gna-re.net/
Work in Progress document

IP networks: Provisioning of routed networks is not a primitive service of
the GNA substrate, though of course using the basic service types (e.g.
implemented by VLANs) participants can create/stitch together their own
IP networks.

Peering: The GNA does not directly participate in any peering, there will
not be an AS number associated with the GNA. Though again peering
arrangements are enabled by the services available from the Substrate
and participating Open Exchange Points.

Commercial Peering Service: these are facilitated by the substrate – on a
lower level, e.g. VLAN – but are not direct services of the GNA.

Infrastructure Sharing: This could be enabled by the use of virtualization
services. This would allow participants to extend their infrastructure and
thus the services they offer to other parts of the globe.

Testbed as a Service: Similar to the Infrastructure Sharing this could be
enabled by the use of virtualization.

CDN: It might well be possible to use the GNA substrate to build a Content
Delivery Network. This might consist of multiple sets of servers located at
Exchange Point facilities and attached to the Exchange Points. This would
enable low latency access to those facilities.
9. Conclusion
Finally there is a set of potential services that should be studied further. These
could become GNA services or they could be further above the net services that
are made possible by the substrate. Among those so far mentioned would be:



A distributed R&E VPN service.
Global DNS service (coordination in this space in the R&E Networking
world)
Making capacity available at the Optical level. This could be another
instance of infrastructure sharing between participants.
The GNA Network Services discussion will continue to evolve, and feedback
remains welcome, while the GNA Technical Team continues to evolve the GNA
thinking.
7
Download