III. What are the similarities and differences in the motives claimed by leaders who supported
independence movements in the Atlantic World in the late 18th and early 19th centuries? What
additional document(s) would help you analyze their motives?
Historical background: Between the American Revolution, 1776 and the second
decade of the 19th century, a series of revolutions and independence wars occurred
in North America, Latin America, and the Caribbean, and France and surrounding
areas. The risings utilized Enlightenment thinking; each event helped inspire later
movements; but the risings occurred in a variety of social and politcal settings.
1. The Declaration of Independence, June 1776
[The following selection was deleted from the final draft of the Declaration of Independence by the Second
Continental Congress in the American English colonies. Emphasis is in the original.]
He [King George III of England] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of
life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery
in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation hither. [ . . . ] [A]nd . . . he is now exciting
those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he had deprived them, by murdering
the people upon whom he also obtruded them: thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one
people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another.
[The following sections were not deleted, and are found in the Declaration of Independence as it was signed on July 4,
1776.] For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world;
For imposing taxes on us without our consent;
For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our
governments;
He [King George III] has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war
against us.
A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free
people.
[...]
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled, appealing to
the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name and by the authority of the
good people of these colonies solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of right ought to
be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown and that
all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that,
as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish
commerce, and do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.
2. National Assembly’s Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, 1789
[ . . . ]Therefore the National Assembly recognizes and proclaims, in the presence and under the auspices of the
Supreme Being, the following rights of man and of the citizen
[...]
6. Law is the expression of the general will. Every citizen has a right to participate personally, or through his
representative, in its formation. It must be the same for all, whether it protects or punishes. All citizen, being
equal in the eyes of the law, are equally eligible to all dignities and to all public positions and occupations,
according to their abilities, and without distinction except that of their virtues and talents.
7. No person shall be accused, arrested, or imprisoned except in the cases and according to the forms prescribed
by law. [. .. ]
13. A common contribution is essential for the maintenance of the public forces and for the cost of
administration. This should be equitably distributed among all the citizens in proportion to their means.
3. This peasant is being crushed by figures representing taxes to church and landlords and required labor
service for landlords.
At George Mason University’s Center for History and New Media,
http://chnm.gmu.edu/revolution/searchfr.php?function=find&keyword=&topReligion=1 &sourceImage=1&Find=Find#
4. Olympe de Gouge’s Declaration of the Rights of Woman and Citizeness*, 1791
Mothers, daughters, sisters, female representatives of the nation ask to be constituted as a national assembly. [ . . . ] In
consequence, the sex that is superior in beauty as in courage, needed in maternal sufferings, recognizes
and declares, in the presence and under the auspices of the Supreme Being, the following rights of woman and
citizeness:
[...]
1. Woman is born free and remains equal to man in rights. Social distinctions may be based only on common utility.
6. The law should be the expression of the general will. All citizenesses and citizens should take part, in person or by
their representatives, in its formation. It must be the same for everyone. All citizenesses and citizens, being equal in
its eyes, should be equally admissible to all public dignities, offices, and employments, according to their ability, and
with no other distinction than that of their virtues and talents. . . .
13.For the maintenance of pubic authority and for expenses of administration, taxation of women and men is equal;
she take part in all forces labor service, in all painful tasks; she must therefore have the same proportion in the
distribution of places, employment, offices, dignities, and in industry. . . .
*In French, a male citizen is le citoyen and the spelling for a female citizen is la citoyenne. “Citizeness” is an
awkward English translation used to indicate the feminine form of the word and “citizen” is used for the male form of
the word.
5. Jean Jacques Dessallines’ Announcement of Independence of St. Domingo (Haiti), 1803
In the name of the Black People, and the Men of Color of St. Domingo: The Independence of St. Domingo is
proclaimed. Restored to our primitive dignity, we have asserted our rights; we swear never to yield them to any power
on earth; the frightful veil of prejudice is torn to pieces, be it so forever. Woe be to them who would dare to put
together its bloody tatters.
[...]
We have sworn not to listen with clemency towards all those who would date to speak of slavery; we will be
inexorable, perhaps even cruel, towards all troops who, themselves forgetting the object for which they have not
ceased fighting since 1780, should come from Europe to bring among us death and servitude. Nothing is too dear, and
all means are lawful to men from whom it is wished to tear the first of all blessings.
6. Simón Bolívar’s, Advice to the Congress of Angostura (Argentina), 1819
We are not Europeans; we are not Indians; we are but a mixed species of aborigines and Spaniards. Americans by
birth and Europeans by law, we find ourselves engaged in a dual conflict: we are disputing with the natives for titles
of ownership, and at the same time we are struggling to maintain ourselves in the country that gave us birth against
the opposition of the invaders.
[...]
Venezuela had, has, and should have a republican government. Its principles should be the sovereignty of thepeople,
divisions of powers, civil liberty, proscription ofslavery, and the abolition of monarchy and privileges.
We need equality to recast, so to speak into a unified nation, the classes of men, political opinions, and public
customs.
[...]
If the Senate were hereditary rather than elective, it would, in my opinion, be the basis, the tie, the very soul of our
republic. In political storms this body would arrest the thunderbolts of the government and would repel any violent
popular reaction.