Much like the talking point that were published for this week, this

Much like the talking point that were published for this week, this week’s summary will
likely lack a portion of substance as we spent a good deal (and very much needed) of time
reviewing last week’s talking points which dealt primarily with a review of linear algebra. It was
quite interesting to see the extent of the results change for a matrix system when the matrix A
was a Hilbert Matrix. What I mean by this is the change that occurs in the solution vector is
significant when only a minor change was made to the original Hilbert Matrix.
Next, we went over what it means for something to be linearly independent. This means
that there are no constants, a, b, and c, such that that ๐‘Ž๐‘ฅโƒ‘ + ๐‘๐‘ฆโƒ‘ + ๐‘๐‘งโƒ‘ = โƒ‘0โƒ‘ unless a, b, and c are all
zero. Otherwise, the subset of vectors is linearly dependent. We then went on to review some
computational methods for finding the determinant of a matrix (namely 2x2 and 3x3 matrices).
Another way that we talked about (which I had never done before in Linear Algebra) was to turn
the original matrix into a triangular matrix through the use of elementary row operations. I was
more familiar using elementary row operations to find the inverse of a matrix by taking the
original and augmenting it with the identity matrix and working towards reduced row echelon
form. In class, we did come up with a neat little chart at what elementary row operations will do
to the result of a determinant. The results were as follows:
Elementary Row Operation
Result of the Determinant
Interchange Rows
Change Sign
Multiply a row by a constant
Multiply the determinant
Add a multiple of 1 row to another row
No change
When discussing inverse matrices, you showed us a way to “stack” two matrices together to
perform the multiplication operation. I know that this method was unfamiliar to me and I can see
the operation in action, I am just a little uneasy about using it at the point. This is merely a
comfort level thing that I need to work on! We wrapped up the linear algebra review by
revisiting characteristic polynomials; how to find them and use them to find the eigenvalues of a
Of the newer material that we looked at briefly, the power method seemed to be pretty
interesting but I am not sure yet what the exact uses for it will be. The algebra work behind the
scenes here was actually straight forward and allowed us to get to the conclusion that
lim ๐œ†๐‘˜ ๐ด๐‘˜ ๐‘ฅโƒ‘ = ๐‘1 ๐‘ฅโƒ‘1 . This is due to the fact that in the theorem we are assuming that λ1 is the
๐‘˜→∞ 1
dominant eigenvalue.
We concluded class with some basics on population growth models and quickly tried to
portray them as matrices. The idea here was that each birthing cycle is a sum of the previous
cycles. So we note that the change of population from one month ๐‘ฅโƒ‘ to another month ๐‘ฆโƒ‘ can be
represented by:
๐‘ฆ0 = ๐‘ฅ1 + ๐‘ฅ2 + ๐‘ฅ3
๐‘ฆ1 = ๐‘ฅ0
๐‘ฆ2 = ๐‘ฅ1
๐‘ฆ3 = ๐‘ฅ3
Converting this back to matrix form gives us:
๐‘ฆโƒ— = ๐ด๐‘ฅโƒ— or โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ—
๐‘ฅ๐‘›+1 = ๐ด๐‘ฅ
๐‘ฅ๐‘› = ๐ด๐‘› โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ—
๐‘› or โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ‘โƒ—