Faculty of Education PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Master’s level University-based study 60 credits Sue Cronin (Deputy Head - School of Teacher Education) Office Location – EDEN111 Telephone Number – 0151 291 3393 Email Address – cronins@hope.ac.uk Elizabeth Parr (School Direct Course Leader) Office Location – EDEN113A Telephone Number – 0151 291 3359 Email Address – parre@hope.ac.uk Ed Wright (School Direct Secondary) Office Location – EDEN115A Telephone Number – 0151 291 3207 Email Address – wrighte@hope.ac.uk Victoria Bates (School Direct Administrator) Office Location – EDEN120 Telephone Number – 0151 291 3658 Email Address – schooldirect@hope.ac.uk Module Handbook 2014-15 PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Table of Contents Welcome ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 The Programme ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Programme Synopsis..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Programme Aims........................................................................................................................................................... 2 Learning Outcomes ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 What will we do in the university sessions? ..................................................................................................................... 3 Programme Content ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Assessment ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Presentation and Length of Assessments ..................................................................................................................... 7 Referencing ................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Submission Dates .......................................................................................................................................................... 8 Procedures for Submitting Assignments....................................................................................................................... 8 Requesting An Extension .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Marking and feedback .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Return / Collection of Assignments ............................................................................................................................ 10 Marking Criteria - M Level........................................................................................................................................... 11 Marking Criteria - P Level ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Reading Materials ........................................................................................................................................................... 13 Teaching and Learning ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Assessment ................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Curriculum................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Research-Informed Teaching ...................................................................................................................................... 15 Professional Development .......................................................................................................................................... 16 English Subject Knowledge ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Mathematics Subject Knowledge ............................................................................................................................... 16 Science Subject Knowledge......................................................................................................................................... 17 Online Resources ............................................................................................................................................................ 18 Sheppard-Worlock Library website ................................................................................................................................ 18 Moodle ........................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Professionalism ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 University Policies ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 Programme Evaluation and Quality Assurance .............................................................................................................. 20 Evaluations .................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Exit Survey ................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Student Staff Liaison Committee (SSLC) ..................................................................................................................... 20 External Examiners...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Internal Examiners ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 Ofsted.......................................................................................................................................................................... 21 PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 What support is available to me? ................................................................................................................................... 22 IT Services ................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Moodle ........................................................................................................................................................................ 22 Student Support and Wellbeing .................................................................................................................................. 22 Library Services ........................................................................................................................................................... 22 Chaplaincy ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 Your NQT Year ................................................................................................................................................................. 24 Appendices ...................................................................................................................................................................... 25 PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Welcome Welcome to the School Direct programme at the Faculty of Education, Liverpool Hope University. On behalf of the University, the School of Education and our Partnership Schools we offer you a warm welcome. We hope that you will find your time with us both challenging and rewarding and that you will take away with you wonderful memories, both social and professional. Teacher Education at Liverpool Hope University has a long and proud tradition of excellence and is currently an innovative and exciting environment which is working hard to achieve the University’s stated goal of being a research-informed teaching University of distinction. The tutors teaching in the faculty are outstanding practitioners within their field and use research to inform and develop their teaching. You have been recruited onto the School Direct programme because, together with our partner schools, we have already recognised your academic capabilities and teaching potential. In partnership with schools it is our aim to develop you as teachers who will have a high impact on students’ learning. The Master’s level components of the School Direct programme will form a vital part of your teacher education. Studying at Master’s level will give you the confidence and the ability to approach relevant theory, with a robust analytical viewpoint and relate that knowledge to your practice. The course will run alongside and complement your development in classroom practice, which takes place at your home and related schools, and will aim to provide you with the skills to apply an academic lens to both your teaching practice and relevant educational theory and policy. Through a combination of the Master’s level sessions, your teaching experiences and your hard work and commitment we hope that you will develop into outstanding teachers who are an inspiration to the children you teach. We also hope that you go on to take advantage of further professional learning opportunities and thus enhance the life chances of the children and young people that you teach over the course of your career. You will be supported by a team of lecturers in the Faculty of Education. They bring together experience and expertise from both the Master’s provision and initial teacher education (ITE). Sue Cronin spent over 18 years teaching mathematics in a variety of schools across Merseyside before working for Liverpool Authority as a school effectiveness officer supporting schools’ mathematics departments and working with G&T pupils across the city. Sue is currently deputy head of the School of Teacher Education. Her research interests include teacher education and creativity in education. Elizabeth Parr has worked in primary schools in Spain, Manchester and Liverpool across key stages one and two. In these roles, she was a subject leader and worked as one of the lead teachers implementing the Communication, Language and Literacy Development Programme. Elizabeth is currently studying for her doctorate degree which focuses on a critical discourse analysis of professionals’ perceptions towards community-oriented schooling. Ed Wright has been teaching for 25 years in a wide variety of secondary schools on the Wirral and in Hertfordshire; as well as being Wirral’s MFL Advisory Teacher. His areas of particular expertise are in teaching Modern Foreign Languages, as well as whole-school Teaching and Learning and pastoral welfare. As Assistant Head at Mosslands School Ed was responsible for Teaching and Learning and Initial Teacher Training. As Wirral LA's Advisory Teacher Ed was also responsible for the development of Modern Foreign Languages Teaching and Learning in Wirral schools. 1|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 The Programme Programme Synopsis The module is designed to support students in developing their understanding of learning, teaching and assessment strategies with the aim of improving practice and enabling all learners to achieve their full potential as well as supporting the development of knowledge and understanding in the student’s subject discipline or age phase specialism. Students will be helped to develop self-direction and originality in problem-solving in relation to the module content, and to act autonomously in planning and implementing change in their educational settings, taking account of current thinking and literature in related areas. Students will be enabled to pursue their own professional and academic interests, including, where relevant, a focus on the priorities of their educational settings. Students will be guided in critiquing and drawing on a range of sources, both academic and policy related, and in locating their own research in relation to these. Programme Aims This module aims to: develop trainees’ understanding of a range of learning, teaching and assessment strategies for the Primary phase; enhance and update trainees’ subject knowledge for teaching in their subject discipline or age phase specialism, including phonics or early mathematics where appropriate; develop trainees’ interest in Education as an academic, research-informed study, enabling them to review critically, consolidate and extend their pedagogical understanding, in the light of theory and their own classroom practice. develop trainees’ ability to be innovative and reflective in terms of their professional practice; develop trainees’ informed and critical understanding of relevant, current education policy and practice. Learning Outcomes By the end of the module, students will be able to: 1. demonstrate a systematic knowledge of the curriculum in their age range or subject specialism (T3.1 / 3.2); 2. demonstrate informed and critical understanding of current education policy and its impact on their classroom practice (P3); 3. demonstrate a critical understanding of theory about how children learn and how this is applied in the professional setting (T2.4); 4. understand formative and summative assessment theory, policy and practice; (6.1) 5. demonstrate self-direction and autonomy in adapting teaching strategies to the needs and strengths of all pupils (T5); 6. reflect critically upon and evaluate the policy and practice in their placement schools with regard to teaching and learning (T4.4). The learning outcomes for this module do link to the Teaching Standards (as indicated above in brackets) and therefore the assignments will provide evidence towards these Standards, though most of your evidence for the Standards will come from your school-based study and teaching practice. 2|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Syllabus Outline You must attend all sessions. Attendance and involvement in taught sessions is essential to achieving the Teachers’ Standards. You are expected to take an active part in all elements you are registered for and consequently you need to ensure you are guided by the reading list and current educational press so that you are positioned to make an informed contribution to all sessions. As with your own teaching experiences you know that group work depends on its success on the participation and enthusiasm of all members. Full day sessions take place in blocks during the year: 11th and 12th September 2014 2nd and 3rd October 2014 23rd and 24th October 2014 4th, 5th and 6th February 2015 20th, 21st and 22nd April 2015 What will we do in the university sessions? The delivery of the programme will be through a blend of face to face lectures, seminars and tutorials on focus days involving active participation. An emphasis will be on active enquiry both face to face and through online engagement via Moodle between the teaching blocks. The sessions will require critical reflective engagement as you develop an understanding of professional practice, relating this to theoretical perspectives and relevant research. A community of enquiry will be developed through seminar opportunities to discuss, compare and contrast practical, professional working practices. During the sessions you will be also be supported in your preparations towards the assignment. You will be guided towards relevant literature from a range of sources, both academic and policy related, so that you can locate your own research and enquiry in relation to these. 3|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Programme Content Session Topics Indicative Reading List Scott, D. and Usher, R. eds. (2002) Understanding Educational Research. Abingdon: Routledge. Hargreaves, D. (1996) ‘Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects’. London: TDA. Hammersley, M. ed. (2007) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University. 1 Overview of the course The importance and nature of research informed teaching Identity of a reflective practitioner Pollard, A. (2008) Reflective Teaching. London: Continuum General Teaching Council for England (2009) Code of Conduct and Practice for Registered Teachers. UK: GTCE. Hare, W. (2002) ‘Ideas for Teachers: Russells’ legacy’, Oxford Review of Education, 28(4) pp.491-507. Hargreaves, A. (2002) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press. Hoyle, E. and John, P.D. (1995) Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice. London: Cassell. Myhill, D. (2008) Cambridge Assessment agency House of Commons Research seminar. 2 Assignment One Overview and Literature reviews Theories of mind and Emotional intelligence Critical analysis Campbell, A., McNamara, O. and Gilroy, P. (2004) Reviewing and Managing Literature in Practitioner research and professional development in education. London: Paul Chapman. Hopkins, D. (2008) A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Gini , G. Pozzoli, H., Hauser, M. (2011) ‘Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion’ in Personality and Individual Differences, 50 pp.603-608. Chechi ,V.K. (2012) Emotional Intelligence and Teaching. IJRESS 2(2), pp.297-304. 3 Education in England today What constitutes knowledge? Hierarchies of Knowledge Data collection – questionnaires (pupil and 4|Page Robinson, K. (2008) Changing paradigms in education. London: RSA. Gove, M (2013) What does it mean to be an educated person? London: DfE Lin, N., Cook, K. and Burt, R. (2001) Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine DE Gruyter. James, M. and Pollard, A. (2009) Principles for effective Pedagogy: International Responses to Evidence form the UK PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 teacher), observations and interviews Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Abingdon: Routledge. Dumont, H., Instance, D.& Benavadies, F. eds. (2010) The nature of Learning using Research to inspire Practice. Paris: OECD Publishing. Mauthner, M. (1997) ‘Methodological Aspects of Collecting Data from Children: Lessons from Three Research Projects’, Children and Society, 11 pp. 16-28. 4 Educational Data: Pisa tables to SATs National and International curriculum The research process and methods Sturman, L. (2012) ’Making the best use of international comparison data’. Research Intelligence, 119, Autumn/Winter, pp. 16-17 Brundrett, M., Duncan, D. and Rhodes, C. (2010) ‘Leading curriculum innovation in primary schools project: an interim report on school leaders’ roles in curriculum development in England’. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 38 (4) pp.403 – 420. Cohen, L., Manton, L. and Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education. Abingdon: Routledge. Bell, J. (1999) Designing and administering questionnaires in Doing Your Research Project. Buckingham: Open University Press. Bruner, J. (1960) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 5 Learning theories Approaches to teaching and learning Application of Constructivism Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Piaget, J. (1976) The Child and Reality. London: Penguin. Skinner, B. (1966) The Behaviour of Organisms; An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts Jarvis, P., Holford, J. and Griffin, C. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Learning. London: Kogan-Page. 6 Presentation of research to date Constructing action plans Ofsted (2001) Action Planning for School Improvement. London: Crown. Altrincher, H. Posch, P. and Somekh (1993) ‘Finding a starting point for your own research’ in Teachers investigate their work: an introduction to the methods of Action Research. London: Routledge. Assignment One Submission 7 Assignment Two Overview Research Diaries The role of interventions assessment 5|Page Altrincher, H. Posch, P. and Somekh (1993) ‘Diaries’ in Teachers investigate their work: an introduction to the methods of Action Research. London: Routledge. Crosbie, T. (2006) Using activity diaries: some methodological lessons. Journal of Research Practice, 2 (1). PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 8 9 10 11 12 Current Policy trends in Assessment Assessment - Formative and Summative Overcoming barriers to learning SEN Behaviour Role of technology in supporting learning Observations Data Analysis – Qualitative, Quantitative and Coding Ofsted and Policy Updates Validity and reliability in assessment Assignment Two Support Black P and Wiliam D (1998) Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London: School of Education, King’s College. Clarke, S. (2005) Formative Assessment in Action: weaving the elements together. London: Hodder Murray Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) ‘Assessment and Classroom Learning’. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5 (1). DfES (2004) Removing Barriers to Achievement: The Government’s Strategy for SEN. London: Crown. Graf, M. (2011) Including and Supporting Learners of English as an Additional Language. London: Continuum. Donald, P., Gosling, S. and Hamilton, J. (1995). 'No problem here?' Children's attitudes to race in a mainly white area’. The Scottish Council for Research in Education: Spotlights 54. Somekh, B. (1995) ‘Analytical Methods’. Academic Development Journal of the South African Association for Academic Development, 1(1), pp.65-67. Campbell, A., McNamara, O. and Gilroy, P. (2004) Qualitative Data Analysis in Practitioner research and professional development in education. London: Chapman. Wiliam, D. (2000) ‘Validity, Reliability, and all that Jazz’. Education 3-13, 29(3)pp. 9-13. Biggs, J. (2002) ‘Aligning the Curriculum to Promote Good Learning’, Constructive Alignment in Action: Imaginative Curriculum Symposium, LTSN Generic Centre. Spendlove, D. (2011) Putting Assessment for Learning into Practice. London: Continuum. Griffiths, A. and Burns, M. (2012) Engaging Learners. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing. Remaining a research active professional Communities of Practice and Enquiry NQT Opportunities Swann, M., Peacock, A., Hart, S. and Drummond, M. (2012) Creating Learning Without Limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Power, S. (2008) ‘The imaginative professional’, in Cunningham, B. ed. Exploring Professionalism. London: IoE Press. Lave, J. and E. Wenger (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Assignment Two Submission 6|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Assessment The whole process of assessment aims to engage you in critical reflection to promote professional development. At the heart of your Initial Teacher Education are your classroom performance and the wider development of professionalism within the subject, curricular, whole school, community and physical contexts. Assessment of your achievement of the Teachers’ Standards (for QTS) is led by our partner schools. No trainee can qualify for the award of PGCE with QTS unless they fulfil all requirements of the programme. These requirements are as follows: • Successful completion of written assignments • Successful achievement against the Teachers’ Standards (for QTS) • Attendance at all elements of the programme The written assignments assessing your performance on this module will be essays which enable you to apply your knowledge and understanding of policy, theory and research to your experiences in the classroom. You will have a large degree of choice about the exact focus of each, within the broad topics described below. Specific essay topics will be decided upon in discussion with your university tutor and, where appropriate, your school mentor. Implications for your PGCE award There are two possible outcomes for students at the end of the PGCE year, depending on whether M level academic requirements are met in the two assignments: Postgraduate Certificate in Education (Master’s (M) level pass) Professional Graduate Certificate in Education (Professional (H) level pass) Our expectation is that all Liverpool Hope PGCE students are capable of achieving a postgraduate PGCE award, and you are accepted for the programme on this basis; we do not offer a choice of academic pathway. The assignments are an integral element of the programme, and must be completed by all students in order to qualify with QTS. If you achieve a Professional Graduate Certificate, you are in no way disadvantaged as a beginning teacher, and may equally choose to complete a Master’s degree, the only difference being that you do not have the M level credits on exit. However, we encourage all to aspire to the Postgraduate award, and to resubmit work where necessary in order to do so. Indicative Question Assignment 1 (essay) Assignment 2 (essay) Investigate an aspect of teaching and learning or curriculum development in your subject or age phase specialism. Investigate an aspect of current assessment policy / theory / practice in your subject and/or or age phase specialism Word count Learning Outcomes Weighting 5000 1,2,3,6 50% 5000 4,5,6 50% Presentation and Length of Assessments All assignments should be word processed, using font equivalent to Times New Roman font size 12. You should present your work in 1.5 line spacing. It is important that you keep to the word length specified for each assignment to ensure your writing is succinct and clear as well as ensuring equity for all trainees doing that assignment. Words within the list of references and/or the appendices (if necessary) are not included in the word count. You should state the word count at the end of each assignment. 7|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Referencing Information on how to reference your work along with several other writing related ‘How-to Guides’ is available via the Library webpages, simply look for ‘How to reference your work at the following link (http://www.hope.ac.uk/gateway/library/helpandsupport/studenthowtoguides/). This is a PDF document that you can download and refer to whenever you need to reference any work for any Faculty of Education course. Submission Dates Deadline for Assignment One: 5th January 2015 Examination Board: February 2015 Deadline for Assignment Two: 5th May 2015 Examination Board: June 2015 Procedures for Submitting Assignments An electronic copy of the assignment should be submitted via the Moodle on the submission deadline, a link will be sent to all students before the submission point. Each assignment should be accompanied by the relevant submission sheet. Each sheet of your assignment should be numbered and have your ID number and name on top right of each page. The submission sheet must downloaded from the information portal. You will need your University username and password to logon to the portal. Once you are logged on, click on My Details (Academic) and then Coursework Submission Sheets and then you will be able to download the relevant module assignment cover sheet. This will already contain your details and a barcode linked to your student record. You must only submit coursework accompanied by your personalised cover sheet. Your assignments must submitted electronically via Turnitin on the School Direct Moodle on the date and at the time specified. Assignments may not be sent through the post or emailed to tutors If you have difficulty meeting a deadline you must see the School Direct Lead before the deadline. Assignments which are submitted late, without an extension, will normally receive a mark of zero. A preliminary indicative grade will normally be available four weeks after submission. This indicative grade is subject to adjustment by the external examiners. Feedback Liverpool Hope University has a policy of returning feedback to all students within 4 working weeks (i.e. excluding holiday weeks) of submission of any assessment. Plagiarism or Collusion You are strongly advised to bear in mind that over reliance upon or excessive use of previously published materials is likely to be judged as plagiarism and could lead to failure. All sources must be acknowledged. Close collaboration with a fellow trainee resulting in almost identical text will be viewed as collusion. Both offences are liable to a maximum penalty of removal from the University course – please refer to University student regulations at http://www.hope.ac.uk/registrarsoffice/guides-to-the-regulations.html. Requesting An Extension Extensions for coursework are only given for two reasons: 1. Medical reasons (where you must have medical evidence i.e. a doctor’s note). 2. Exceptional personal circumstances. 8|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 The following examples are NOT exceptional circumstances: Having too many other assignments. All students have a lot of work to do and you are expected to organise your time efficiently from the start of the module to cope with these fluctuating demands; Computer problems. You are expected to work on your assignment so that it is finished at least the day before the date of submission and thereby avoid last minute problems. You are also advised to back-up your work every time you make changes, and are advised to save your work in more than one place i.e. do not just keep your work on a pen drive, because you could lose it; Having paid work commitments. Again it is your responsibility to organise your time so that this does not become a problem. If you need an extension for an assignment you must formally apply for one. The form can be downloaded from the Moodle site. Please complete the form and send to the Programme Administrator. In terms of extensions for pieces of assessment for this module or a number of modules, you must formally apply to the Course leader (please cc to the School Direct Administrator) who will ask for the reason, and may require evidence before granting an extension. Please therefore do not leave it until the last minute to seek an extension. If there is a medical reason why you cannot submit your assignment you MUST get a signed sickness absence form from your doctor (in certain cases self-certification may be accepted). For exceptional personal circumstances you do need to explain these. For further details, please see Liverpool Hope University Universal Conventions and Procedures on: http://www.hope.ac.uk/registrars-office/universal-conventions-procedures.html You MUST photocopy any evidence (such as the sick note) and also ensure a photocopy is handed as soon as possible to the Programme Administrator. You are also advised to keep a copy of any sick note for your files. By ensuring these copies are delivered to the appropriate people, you ensure that no submission is expected from you. This is important to ensure that you are given another opportunity to submit to the assessment at a later date without incurring a non-submission penalty. Please check the university guidelines for the penalty incurred. N.B: Assignments which are submitted late, without an extension, will normally receive a mark of ZERO. Marking and feedback Your work is marked according to the marking criteria below. An overall mark is awarded based on an overall ‘best-fit’ judgment, and written feedback is also given. The feedback form which is available on Moodle will be used for all assignments and provides opportunity for formative guidance to be given as to how to improve your future marks, and you are urged to use this to improve subsequent marks. It is the University’s policy to aim to provide feedback after four weeks following the submission date. This four week period will not include the holiday period. A sample of assignments is second marked as part of our quality assurance procedures, and a further sample sent to our external examiners whose role is to confirm our standards are in line with those of comparable institutions. Lecturers are not able to give feedback on assignment drafts, though you will have the opportunity to discuss your plans beforehand. If you are concerned about the accuracy of the English you should ask someone to help you check through before you submit. These guidelines help ensure fairness and parity for all students. 40-49% (Professional level) 9|Page PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 If your mark is in the 40-49% bracket, your assignment passes at professional level but not at M level, so does not carry credits. You have one opportunity, if you wish to use it, to resubmit your assignment within a designated time scale. Good guidance is provided through your tutor’s feedback as to how to resubmit successfully at M level, and your tutor will also discuss your work if you wish. If your resubmission meets the M level requirements, your official mark is capped at 50%, but you will also be notified as to the mark it would have received as a first submission. Below 40% (Fail) Assignments marked below 40% MUST be resubmitted within the designated time scale to achieve a pass at 40%+ if you are to continue with the PGCE programme. If after submitting a revised assignment, you have still failed to gain a pass mark in either module, you will have been deemed to have failed the PGCE with no further opportunity for resubmission. Return / Collection of Assignments Students will be informed when to collect their work. The feedback and marked assignments will be emailed to the students or, if submitted as hard copy, the marked scripts can be collected from the Education Office. The University is not responsible for any students’ coursework that is not collected. 10 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Marking Criteria - M Level Assessment objectives Distinction Merit Secure Pass Pass Narrow fail 70 - 100 60-69 50-59 40-49 35-39 AO1 Knowledge and understanding Comprehensive knowledge of pertinent issues; highly developed understanding theory and its application in practice. Strong knowledge of pertinent issues; well-developed understanding of theory and its application in practice. Secure knowledge of main issues; clear understanding of key concepts, and how they relate to practice. Adequate knowledge and understanding of main issues and concepts, with links to relevant examples of practice. Some reference made to issues or concepts, but more evidence of knowledge and understanding, or better links to practice, needed. AO2 Analysis and independent thought Consistently high level of analysis throughout, showing critical awareness, insight and individual / creative thinking. Sustained critical analysis, showing well developed independent thinking and evaluative skills. Critical awareness shown in analysis, with evaluation / reflection in commentary and generally sound independent judgments. Some aspects considered critically; discussion includes some reflection, or independent judgements and comment. The account tends towards description but some attempt at analysis or reflection; commentary needs further development. AO3 Quality, range and use of research Extensive, in-depth reading from a range of appropriate sources; wellchosen references skilfully integrated into commentary. A wide range of relevant and up to date reading, used effectively to support commentary. A range of relevant and up to date reading used regularly to support commentary and illustrate understanding. A range of relevant reading, used at times to support commentary and illustrate understanding. Limited range of reading: additional / more appropriate reading needs to be evidenced to support commentary. AO4 Synthesis, presentation and structure Confident handling and synthesis of complex material; skilled construction and presentation of thoughtful and convincing arguments / conclusions. Systematic handling of complex material, presented effectively, with well-developed arguments and conclusions. Secure handling of complex material, with clear structure and sequence to arguments. Satisfactory handling and presentation of relevant material, with some structure and coherence to arguments. Relevant material has been gathered, but needs to be presented more clearly / in a more structured way. 11 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Marking Criteria - P Level Assessment Objectives 35-39 30-34 <30 (below the standard required to pass) Knowledge and understanding Secure knowledge of pedagogy and understanding of subject specialism / area of special interest. References to issues or ideas are generally linked to examples of practice. Adequate knowledge of pedagogy and understanding of subject specialism / area of special interest. Some reference made to issues or ideas, with some reference to examples of practice Insufficient knowledge of pedagogy or understanding of subject specialism / area of special interest. Analysis and independent thought Some evidence of analysis, eg evaluation of observed classroom practice, reflection on own teaching, comment on literature, critique of policy. The account tends towards description, but some attempt at critical comment or reflection, eg in evaluating observed classroom practice, or reflecting on own teaching. Little evidence of analysis, criticality or reflection with regard to either reading or observed practice. Quality, range and use of reading Evidence of a core of appropriate reading, with some use to support and illustrate understanding. Evidence of reading a selection of policy documents and/or websites, at least partly related to discussion. Little evidence of relevant reading in relation to the topic / reading not linked to discussion. Synthesis, presentation and structure Relevant material has been gathered, and presented in a mainly structured way. Relevant material has been gathered and presented with some evidence of structure. Insufficient material has been gathered to be able to present an adequate response to the topic. 12 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Reading Materials Library Support Your reading list can be accessed online via Moodle. This allows you a quick and easy link to the Library Catalogue where you can instantly see availability of stock. If it is an online resource you will be able to link directly to the item. If you need any help or support such as effective searching of the online resources or advanced help for research, please contact our Faculty Librarian: Philippa Williams on 0151 291 2079 or williap@hope.ac.uk There are full details of all library services, facilities and support available from the Library Services web pages www.hope.ac.uk/library Teaching and Learning Bruner, J. (1960) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Demos (2004) About Learning: Report of Learning Working Group. London: Demos. Freire, P. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Continuum. General Teaching Council for England (2009) Code of Conduct and Practice for Registered Teachers. UK: GTCE. Gordon, M. (2009) ‘The misuses and effective uses of constructivist teaching‘ in Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. 15(6) pp.737–746. Gove, M (2013) What does it mean to be an educated person? London: DfE James, M. and Pollard, A. (2009) Principles for effective Pedagogy: International Responses to Evidence from the UK Teaching and Learning Research Programme. Abingdon: Routledge. Jarvis, P., Holford, J. and Griffin, C. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Learning. London: Kogan-Page. Hare, W. (2002) ‘Ideas for Teachers: Russells’ legacy’, Oxford Review of Education, 28(4) pp.491-507. Hargreaves, A. (2002) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press. Hoyle, E. and John, P.D. (1995) Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice. London: Cassell. Lin, N., Cook, K. and Burt, R. (2001) Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine DE Gruyter. Myhill, D. (2008) Cambridge Assessment agency House of Commons Research seminar. Ofsted (2001) Action Planning for School Improvement. London: Crown. Piaget, J. (1976) The Child and Reality. London: Penguin. Pollard, A. (2008) Reflective Teaching. London: Continuum Power, S. (2008) ‘The imaginative professional’, in Cunningham, B. ed. Exploring Professionalism. London: IoE Press. Robinson, K. (2008) Changing paradigms in education. London: RSA. Skinner, B. (1966) The Behaviour of Organisms; An Experimental Analysis. New York: AppletonCentury-Crofts 13 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Assessment Assessment Reform Group (1999) Assessment for Learning: Beyond the Black Box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education. Assessment Reform Group (2009) Assessment in schools: fit for purpose? Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education. Black P and Wiliam D (1998) Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. London: School of Education, King’s College. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) ‘Assessment and Classroom Learning’. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5 (1). Black P and Wiliam D (2006) ‘The Reliability of Assessments’ in Gardner, J.Ed. (2006) Assessment and Learning. London: Sage Clarke, S. (2005) Formative Assessment in Action: weaving the elements together. London: Hodder Murray. OFSTED (2008) Assessment for Learning: Impact of Strategy Support. London: Crown. Sainsbury, M. and Sizmur, S. (1998) ‘Level descriptions in the National Curriculum: What kind of criterion-referencing is this?’ Oxford Review of Education, 24(2) pp. 181-193. Spendlove, D. (2011) Putting Assessment for Learning into Practice. London: Continuum. Sturman, L. (2012) ’Making the best use of international comparison data’. Research Intelligence, 119, Autumn/Winter, pp. 16-17 Tienken, C. Goldberg, S. and Dirocco, D. (2009) ‘Questioning the Questions’. Kappa Delta Pi Record. Kappa Delta Pi. Wiliam, D. (1993) Technical issues in the development and implementation of a system of criterion referenced age-independent levels of attainment in the National Curriculum of England and Wales. London: KCL. Wiliam, D. (2000) ‘The meanings and consequences of educational assessments’. Critical Quarterly. 42(1) pp. 105-127. Wiliam, D. (2000) ‘Reliability, validity and all that jazz’. Education 29 (3) pp. 9-13. Wiliam, D. (2001) Level best? Levels of attainment in national curriculum assessment. London: ATL. Curriculum Alexander, R. (2001) Culture and Pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell. Biggs, J. (2002) ‘Aligning the Curriculum to Promote Good Learning’, Constructive Alignment in Action: Imaginative Curriculum Symposium, LTSN Generic Centre. Brundrett, M., Duncan, D. and Rhodes, C. (2010) ‘Leading curriculum innovation in primary schools project: an interim report on school leaders’ roles in curriculum development in England’. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 38 (4) pp.403 – 420. DfE (2013) The National Curriculum in England: Key Stages 1 and 2. London: Crown. Dillon, J.T. (2009) ‘The questions of curriculum’. Journal of Curriculum Studies 41(3) pp.343–359. 14 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Kelly, A. (2009) The Curriculum: Theory and Practice. London: Sage. Marsh, C. (2004) Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. London: Routledge. Martin, J. (1976) ‘What Should We Do with a Hidden Curriculum When We Find One?’ Curriculum Inquiry 6(2) pp. 135-151. Moon, B. and Murphy, P. ed. (1999) Curriculum in Context. London: Paul Chapman. Moore, A. (2006) Schooling, Society and Curriculum. London: Routledge. INCA (2011) Curriculum specification in seven countries. Dublin: NCCA. NFER (2011) Review of the National Curriculum in England: Report on subject breadth in international jurisdictions. Slough: NFER. Oates, T. (2010) Could do better: Using international comparisons to refine the National Curriculum in England. Cambridge: University of Cambridge. OECD (2010) PISA 2009 Results: What Makes a School Successful?: Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV), PISA, OECD. Westbury, I. and Millburn, G. (2007) Rethinking Schooling: Twenty five years of the Journal of Curriculum Studies. London: Routledge. Research-Informed Teaching Altrincher, H. Posch, P. and Somekh (1993) Teachers investigate their work: an introduction to the methods of Action Research. London: Routledge. Bell, J. (1999) Designing and administering questionnaires in Doing Your Research Project. Buckingham: Open University Press. Campbell, A., McNamara, O. and Gilroy, P. (2004) Practitioner research and professional development in education. London: Paul Chapman. Cohen, L., Manton, L. and Morrison, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education. Abingdon: Routledge. Crosbie, T. (2006) ‘Using activity diaries: some methodological lessons’. Journal of Research Practice, 2 (1). Dumont, H., Instance, D. and Benavides, F. Eds. (2010) The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice. Center for Educational Research and Innovation: OCDE. Hargreaves, D. (1996) Teaching as a research-based profession: possibilities and prospects. London: TDA. Hammersley, M. ed. (2007) Educational Research and Evidence-Based Practice. Milton Keynes: Open University. Hoyle, E., and John, P. D. (1995) Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell. Hopkins, D. (2008) A Teacher’s Guide to Classroom Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Scott, D. and Usher, R. eds. (2002) Understanding Educational Research. Abingdon: Routledge. Somekh, B. (1995) ‘Analytical Methods’. Academic Development Journal of the South African Association for Academic Development, 1(1), pp.65-67. Wiliam, D. (2000) ‘Validity, Reliability, and all that Jazz’. Education 3-13, 29(3) pp.9-13. 15 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Professional Development Arthur, J. and Cremin, T. (2010) Learning to teach in the Primary School. London: Routledge. Chechi ,V. K. (2012) ‘Emotional Intelligence and Teaching’. IJRESS 2(2) pp.297-304. DfES (2004) Removing Barriers to Achievement: The Government’s Strategy for SEN. London: Crown. Donald, P., Gosling, S. and Hamilton, J. (1995). 'No problem here?' Children's attitudes to race in a mainly white area’. The Scottish Council for Research in Education: Spotlights 54. Dumont, H., Instance, D. and Benavadies, F. eds. (2010) The nature of Learning using Research to inspire Practice. Paris: OECD Publishing. Gini , G. Pozzoli, H., Hauser, M. (2011) ‘Bullies have enhanced moral competence to judge relative to victims, but lack moral compassion’ Personality and Individual Differences, 50 pp.603-608. Graf, M. (2011) Including and Supporting Learners of English as an Additional Language. London: Continuum. Griffiths, A. and Burns, M. (2012) Outstanding Teaching: Engaging Learners. Carmarthen: Crown House. Hayes, D. (2008) Foundations of Primary Teaching. London: Routledge Mauthner, M. (1997) ‘Methodological Aspects of Collecting Data from Children: Lessons from Three Research Projects’, Children and Society, 11 pp. 16-28. Swann, M., Peacock, A., Hart, S. and Drummond, M. (2012) Creating Learning Without Limits. Maidenhead: OUP. Woolfolk, A., Hughes, M. and Walkup, V. (2007) Psychology in Education. London: Pearson. English Subject Knowledge Gamble, N. Yates, S. (2008) Understanding Children's Literature. London: Sage. Johnston, R. & Watson, J. (2007) Teaching Synthetic Phonics. Exeter: Learning Matters. Ofsted (2010) Reading by Six. London: Crown. Medwell, J. et al (2012) Primary English Knowledge and Understanding. Exeter: Learning Matters Ltd. Rose, J. (2009) Independent Review of the Primary Curriculum. Nottingham: DCSF. Waugh, D., Warner, C. and Waugh R. (2013) Teaching Grammar, Punctuation and Spelling in Primary Schools. Exeter: Learning Matters. Whitehead, M. (2007) Developing Language and Literacy with Young Children. London; Paul Chapman. Mathematics Subject Knowledge Askew, M. (1998) Teaching Primary Mathematics; a guide for newly qualified and student teachers. London: Hodder and Stoughton. Cotton, T. (2010) Understanding and Teaching Primary Mathematics. Longman. Haylock, D. (2006) Mathematics Explained for Primary Teachers. (Third Edition) London: Sage. Mooney, C. et al. (2007) Primary Mathematics, Teaching Theory and Practice. (Third Edition). Exeter: Learning Matters. 16 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Suggate, J. et al. (2006) Mathematical Knowledge for Primary Teachers. London: David Fulton. https://www.ncetm.org.uk/ Register (free) and explore the audit in the Personal Learning Section Science Subject Knowledge Allen, M. (2010) Misconceptions in Primary Science. Buckingham: Open University Press. ASE (2010) Be Safe! (4th Edition) Hatfield: ASE Goldsworthy, A. and Feasey, R. (1997, revised Bell, S.) Making Sense of Primary Science Investigations. Hatfield: ASE. Harlen, W. (2005) Teaching, Learning and Assessing Science 5 – 12. London: SAGE. Sharp, J. et al. (2009) Achieving QTS, Primary Science Knowledge and Understanding. Exeter: Learning Matters. Ward H., Roden J., Hewlett C., Foreman J., (2009) The teaching of science in the primary classroom; A Practical Guide. London: SAGE. 17 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Online Resources Sheppard-Worlock Library website The study of Education is very well supported by a number of online collections which you can access via your login to the Hope portal. In addition to those containing newspapers and books, there are many large collections of journal articles. The most useful databases for your online journal searches have been gathered together for you by your Faculty Librarian and are listed within Metalib. Metalib is a commonly used platform for organising the library’s Online Resources. It allows cross-searching of multiple collections, and makes it possible to find out with one search whether Hope has online access to a particular journal title. Moodle Moodle is intended to support you through your programme of study and enhance your learning experience. Moodle provides a space in which additional resources can be stored and/or signposted and some tutors may create activities for you to carry out online to help you measure your own progress. For some groups tutors may want to use the collaborative forums in which you can communicate with each other and work on joint projects. From the University website home page select ‘Student/Staff Gateway’ from the very top right-hand side navigation, you will then see a link to Students, select this and then choose 'My Hope' from the left hand navigation. Click on the link to ‘Moodle’ (http://moodle.hope.ac.uk/). Use your university network login details to access the system. 18 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Professionalism The University requires ALL students to attend ALL teaching sessions unless there are significant mitigating circumstances. You are expected to arrive on time to your scheduled sessions (and any other pre-arranged meetings you may arranged with tutors). If you miss any sessions you should expect to be contacted by your tutor to find out why you have been absent. If you are unable to attend a session (or pre-arranged meeting) you should contact your tutor as soon as possible to inform them and explain your absence. You must also notify the School Direct Administrator – Victoria Bates in EDEN120 as soon as possible; Victoria Bates Tel: 0151 291 3658 Email: schooldirect@hope.ac.uk If you miss a scheduled session it is your responsibility to catch up on what you have missed. If you are late arriving to a session please enter the teaching room, please make your apology to the tutor, and quietly take a seat without disturbing any other students. If you arrive any later than 15 minutes after the start of a session your tutor may refuse to allow you to join the class. If your tutor refuses entry on the grounds of being late you must follow their decision. They may allow you to come in after the break. If they refuse entry due to lateness, you are advised to ask if you can join after the break. If they will allow this, ensure you find out what time the session is due to start back after the break (and be on time). All students are expected to be punctual, professional and courteous with staff and fellow students at all times. During taught sessions you must turn off your mobile phone (unless there is a very good reason why you cannot e.g. childcare issues or sick family member). If you do need to leave your phone on please be courteous and inform your tutor before the start of the session. If you do not comply with these courteous requests your tutor may ask you to leave the class as taking calls or texting in class is very disruptive. If you email your tutors please do so in a courteous fashion which reflects the professional nature of your relationship and your expectations of a graduate career. University Policies You can access University Policies on: The academic responsibility of students; The progression and award regulations associated with your degree Plagiarism The provision of assessment arrangements for students with a disability, illness, injury or adverse personal circumstances Academic appeals By looking at the University website: http://www.hope.ac.uk/gateway/supportandwellbeing/studentadministration/policiesandprocedur es/ You can access information on support services at: http://www.hope.ac.uk/gateway/students/ 19 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Programme Evaluation and Quality Assurance All aspects of the School Direct programme are subject to annual review. We rely on schools, university, tutors and trainees for help in maintaining the quality of the Liverpool Hope University programme. The University is committed to placing students at the heart of its education mission. We welcome constructive feedback at any stage on any aspect of the course, and encourage you to voice any concerns, should they arise, sooner rather than later so we can act wherever possible to improve matters for you, other trainees and subsequent cohorts. Equally we hope you will find much to celebrate within the course and it is also helpful to hear about this. As well as the formal procedures outline below, we encourage you to talk with us; Curriculum Tutors, the Programme Lead and Deputy Head of School will always be interested to hear about relevant points. The following sections outline ways in which you are asked to contribute to the overall picture. Evaluations Throughout the year, you will be asked to complete evaluations of the course. The responses gathered from these evaluations are collated and fed back to tutors, the Programme Lead and the head and deputy head of the School of Education to inform and improve the services and processes relating to the School Direct programme. This in turn feeds into the University’s Annual Programme Monitoring process where all programmes have to consider student evaluation as part of their annual review process. Exit Survey In addition, the NCTL (National College of Teaching and Leadership) may ask you to complete an anonymous exit survey towards the end of the PGCE year and during the spring term following your completion this will be followed up with the NQT survey, a national survey of all newly qualified teachers. Student Staff Liaison Committee (SSLC) The SSLC is made up of two trainees from each school alliance group who volunteer for the role, and who are then elected by their peers. The role of the SSLC is to gather the views and comments of all trainees who attend a particular programme and to feedback those views and comments at SSLC meetings. The SSLC meetings are attended by the Programme Director and other appropriate staff from the University. The committee aim to collectively discuss and refine our provision and the student experience. SSLC members are then asked to feedback to the other trainees. SSLC meetings occur at least three times every year and are held at the University, usually during lunch-time. At the end of the year SSLC members are asked to meet with the External Examiners. External Examiners Students often ask questions about how we know that their degree is broadly of the same standard as degrees awarded for similar courses by other universities. In the UK we have a system called external examining which is one of several ways that we confirm that standards are met. An external examiner is generally an experienced lecturer from another university who is appointed by Liverpool Hope to offer an independent view as to whether the work of Hope students on a course is of the correct standard. The external examiner does this by looking at a sample of work (e.g. assignments, exam answers, dissertations), discussing the work with your lecturers and attending the assessment boards to endorse results. They then produce an annual report which tells us about any concerns they have and any good practice they have identified. The external examiners’ reports 20 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 are made available to student representatives and school representatives via Moodle and are also discussed in Staff Student Committees. Internal Examiners The Internal Examiners (usually the academic team in your Department) are specifically responsible for: a) the preparation of coursework assessment requirements and ensuring that they are appropriate to the level, syllabus content and learning outcomes; b) the initial assessment, and internal moderation*, of coursework assignments and examination scripts; c) ensuring that the Assessment Co-ordinator is able to make available to External Examiners an agreed range of internally moderated coursework assignments in good time to enable the External Examiners to undertake external moderation before the meeting of the Panel of Examiners or Assessment, Progression & Award Board. *In the Department of Teacher Education assessments are internally moderated in line with university guidelines. You can view these at http://www.hope.ac.uk/gateway/supportandwellbeing/studentadministration/understandingyourd egree/assessmentofstudentsguidelines/ document AG16. Ofsted As with schools, ITE courses are subject to Ofsted inspections. Should this happen during the year we will inform you of all arrangements by email. 21 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 What support is available to me? For any concerns or issues please contact your curriculum tutor in the first instance (Elizabeth Parr for Primary School Direct and Ed Wright for Secondary School Direct). They may suggest you contact a Senior Faculty Academic Advisor if your concern is related to your academic study. If it is a pastoral issue they may seek further support from Student Support and Wellbeing team. As tutors have extensive teaching commitments and may often not be available during the day so an immediate response to messages left may not always be possible. However, the tutors have voicemail and email facilities and they can therefore leave a message for them at any time. If necessary, or you are not satisfied with the support offered, you should contact the deputy head of the School of Teacher Education, Sue Cronin. IT Services The I.T. Service Desk staff are here to offer help and guidance on the whole range of I.T. facilities available at Liverpool Hope from emails, photocopying and printing to password resets and access issues. If you have any problem / query, please visit us on the first floor of the Sheppard Worlock Library or on 0151 291-2100 - Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Alternatively email: itshelp@hope.ac.uk There is a wireless network covering most of the University including all open access, teaching areas and Halls of Residence. Your normal username and password will allow you to log onto the service. A laptop loan service operates from the Student Success Zone (1st floor of the Gateway Building). You will need your student ID card to use this service. Please be aware that you are responsible for the laptop issued to you until it's return. Fines do operate for late return of machines. Moodle Liverpool Hope’s online learning environment is called ‘Moodle’. This resource is accessible via the Liverpool Hope website by clicking on ‘Student/Staff Gateway’ from the very top right-hand side navigation; you will then see a link to Students, select this and then choose 'My Hope' from the left hand navigation. Click on the link to ‘Moodle’ (http://moodle.hope.ac.uk/). Use your university network login details to access the system. If you have any issues with accessing Moodle please contact IT Helpdesk on 0151 291 2100. Student Support and Wellbeing The Student Support and Wellbeing team are on hand to offer advice and help with everything from financial support to careers advice and health concerns. They provide a one-stop service and will address all aspects of your pastoral care in an integrated way without passing you between different departments. There are full details about the support available at http://www.hope.ac.uk/lifeathope/studentsupport/ The Student Support and Wellbeing services are located in the Gateway Building and can be contacted on 0151 291 3427 or sdw@hope.ac.uk Library Services Liverpool Hope’s Library Service provides access to a wide ranging collection of physical and online resources to support learning and research. The service also provides different types of study space across both campuses to support the wide range of learning styles and needs, from individual study rooms to group spaces, and from silent study to more relaxed social learning. 22 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Library staff work close to the materials and students within the libraries so are very accessible to provide support and advice on resources and services where and when you need it. Support can also be obtained virtually via our chat and email services. If you need any help or support such as effective searching of the online resources or advanced help for research, please contact our Faculty Librarian: Philippa Williams Phone number: 0151 291 2079 Email address: williap@hope.ac.uk Support is also available from the Subject Support Points, pop along to get some advice and help from a librarian. Alternatively you can email askalibrarian@hope.ac.uk from within this email you can also invite us to chat. There are full details of all library services, facilities and support available from the Library Services web pages www.hope.ac.uk/library Chaplaincy The motto of Hope University is "Faith, Hope and Love". These are words taken from St Paul's letter to the Corinthians. The University strives to lives by these three virtues. The chaplaincy team works with students and staff to try and live these out in daily life. The Chaplaincy is at the rear of the EDEN Building, Hope Park, but the team are to be found around the campuses, as well as in Hope Chapel every day. Come into the chaplaincy for tea and coffee whenever you want. If something is really getting you down then it might be a good idea to talk to someone. The chaplains are always here to talk to. We are open-minded and non-judgemental. There is a small room in the chaplaincy which is a great place to talk to one of the chaplains in a more private setting. To contact the listening service you can email us, call us on the number below or drop in. Chaplains are available Monday to Friday all day and some evenings. Contact us at chaplaincy@hope.ac.uk or call 0151 291 3545 23 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Your NQT Year We realise that your first year as a teacher can be both exciting and daunting with many challenges ahead. This is why our commitment to you as a Liverpool Hope student does not stop once you have graduated. We feel it is crucial to continue to support and encourage you during your first year of teaching to ensure you have a strong foundation to become outstanding practitioners. Liverpool Hope is offering to all NQTs the opportunity to engage in a support programme that will help you to update your knowledge, skills and ability in key areas that are essential in becoming an effective and competent teaching practitioner. Even if you have not secured a teaching position, you will have access to a range of conferences, twilight sessions, online resources and tutor support. The Primary NQT Enhancement Programme will provide an opportunity for you to engage critically with your own professional practice during your induction year and equip you with the knowledge, skills and understanding essential to become effective and competent teaching practitioners. The programme aims to provide you with: The support to successfully engage with, and complete, your NQT induction year The knowledge, skills and understanding essential to become an effective and competent teaching practitioner The skills to critically reflect so that you can improve on your own practice and make a significant contribution to improving your classroom practice and raising achievement The opportunity, and context, to engage critically with your own professional experiences. What will the programme include? Four NQT Conferences that will take place at significant points throughout the academic year. Workshops and lectures will be led by guest speakers and experts in the field of education Free CPD opportunities throughout the year Student email account, library access (borrowing rights for up to 3 books) and NQT Moodle account. Cost: FREE to Liverpool Hope NQTs £160 for Non Liverpool Hope Graduates (or £50 per conference if purchased separately) For further information please see www.hope.ac.uk/nqtalumni or email nqt@hope.ac.uk 24 | P a g e PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 Appendices Planning & Teaching Differentiation Assessment 25 | P a g e Knowledge give pupils regular feedback, both orally and through accurate marking, and encourage pupils to respond to the feedback Pupil Progress 6.4 Expectations TEACHERS' STANDARDS 2012 PART ONE: TEACHING T1 Set high expectations which inspire, motivate and challenge pupils 1.1 establish a safe and stimulating environment for pupils, rooted in mutual respect 1.2 set goals that stretch and challenge pupils of all backgrounds, abilities and dispositions 1.3 demonstrate consistently the positive attitudes, values and behaviour which are expected of pupils T2 Promote good progress and outcomes by pupils 2.1 be accountable for pupils’ attainment, progress and outcomes 2.2 plan teaching to build on pupils’ capabilities and prior knowledge 2.3 guide pupils to reflect on the progress they have made and their emerging needs 2.4 demonstrate knowledge and understanding of how pupils learn and how this impacts on teaching 2.5 encourage pupils to take a responsible and conscientious attitude to their own work and study T3 Demonstrate good subject and curriculum knowledge have a secure knowledge of the relevant subject(s) and curriculum areas, foster and maintain pupils’ 3.1 interest in the subject, and address misunderstandings demonstrate a critical understanding of developments in the subject and curriculum areas, and 3.2 promote the value of scholarship demonstrate an understanding of and take responsibility for promoting high standards of literacy, 3.3 articulacy and the correct use of standard English, whatever the teacher’s specialist subject PRIMARY ONLY: if teaching early reading, demonstrate a clear understanding of systematic synthetic 3.4 phonics PRIMARY ONLY: if teaching early mathematics, demonstrate a clear understanding of appropriate 3.5 teaching strategies T4 Plan and teach well-structured lessons 4.1 impart knowledge and develop understanding through effective use of lesson time 4.2 promote a love of learning and children’s intellectual curiosity set homework and plan other out-of-class activities to consolidate and extend the knowledge and 4.3 understanding pupils have acquired 4.4 reflect systematically on the effectiveness of lessons and approaches to teaching 4.5 contribute to the design and provision of an engaging curriculum within the relevant subject area(s) T5 Adapt teaching to respond to the strengths and needs of all pupils know when and how to differentiate appropriately, using approaches which enable pupils to be taught 5.1 effectively have a secure understanding of how a range of factors can inhibit pupils’ ability to learn, and how best 5.2 to overcome these demonstrate an awareness of the physical, social and intellectual development of children, and know 5.3 how to adapt teaching to support pupils’ education at different stages of development have a clear understanding of the needs of all pupils, including those with special educational needs; 5.4 those of high ability; those with English as an additional language; those with disabilities; and be able to use and evaluate distinctive teaching approaches to engage and support them T6 Make accurate and productive use of assessment know and understand how to assess the relevant subject and curriculum areas, including statutory 6.1 assessment requirements 6.2 make use of formative and summative assessment to secure pupils’ progress 6.3 use relevant data to monitor progress, set targets, and plan subsequent lessons PGCE School Direct Primary PRIPPM001AZ2014/15 T7 7.1 7.3 7.4 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 TEACHERS' STANDARDS 2012 P1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 P2 P3 PART TWO: PERSONAL & PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Teachers uphold public trust in the profession and maintain high standards of ethics and behaviour, within and outside school, by: treating pupils with dignity, building relationships rooted in mutual respect, and at all times observing proper boundaries appropriate to a teacher’s professional position having regard for the need to safeguard pupils’ well-being, in accordance with statutory provisions showing tolerance of and respect for the rights of others not undermining fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect, and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs ensuring that personal beliefs are not expressed in ways which exploit pupils’ vulnerability or might lead them to break the law Teachers must have proper and professional regard for the ethos, policies and practices of the school in which they teach, and maintain high standards in their own attendance and punctuality. Teachers must have an understanding of, and always act within, the statutory frameworks which set out their professional duties and responsibilities. 26 | P a g e Professional Conduct 1.1 Responsibilities T8 8.1 Behaviour 7.2 Manage behaviour effectively to ensure a good and safe learning environment have clear rules and routines for behaviour in classrooms, and take responsibility for promoting good and courteous behaviour both in classrooms and around the school, in accordance with the school’s behaviour policy have high expectations of behaviour, and establish a framework for discipline with a range of strategies, using praise, sanctions and rewards consistently and fairly manage classes effectively, using approaches which are appropriate to pupils’ needs in order to involve and motivate them maintain good relationships with pupils, exercise appropriate authority, and act decisively when necessary. Fulfil wider professional responsibilities make a positive contribution to the wider life and ethos of the school develop effective professional relationships with colleagues, knowing how and when to draw on advice and specialist support deploy support staff effectively take responsibility for improving teaching through appropriate professional development, responding to advice and feedback from colleagues communicate effectively with parents with regard to pupils’ achievements and well-being