Name_____________ Date_______________ Ecology Graphing Packet Standard: I am able to complete my assignments on time in a satisfactory manner. My work is clear evidence that I use my assignments to practice skills as well as to provide evidence of learning and mastery of what I’ve learned. I have the strength of character to do the job that is asked of me and grow from the experience. Criterion 0 Homewo rk and Effort Homework and The assignment Effort does not offer sufficient evidence of student effort. Gradebook Points /100 Late Penalty 1-2 (Approaches) 3-4 (Meets) 5-6 (Exceeds) 1.The assignment is mostly complete, OR 2.mostly incorrect, OR 3. Work is NOT shown when appropriate, OR 4.Writing is NOT legible. The assignment is complete and mostly correct. Work is shown when appropriate. All writing is legible. The assignment is complete and almost entirely correct. Work is shown when appropriate. All writing is legible. 65 85 100 50 Part 1: Ecology Graphs Graph 1: Rabbits Over Time a. The graph shows a __________ growth curve. b. The carrying capacity for rabbits is ______ c. During which month were the rabbits in exponential growth? Graph 2: Average Toe Length a. In 1800, about how many people surveyed had a 3 cm toe? _______ How many in 2000? _______ b. The data shows the ____________ selection has occurred? c. In 2000, what is the average toe length? ______ What is the average toe length in 1800 _______ Graph 3: Mexico and US a. In Mexico, what percentage of the population is between 0-4 years of age? _______ In the US? ______ b. Which population is growing the fastest? ________ c. Which age group has the smallest number in both countries? _____ STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers before moving on Chart 4: Trapping Geese In order to estimate the population of geese in Northern Wisconsin, ecologists marked 10 geese and then released them back into the population. Over a 6 year period, geese were trapped and their numbers recorded. a. Use the formula to calculate the estimated number of geese in the area studied? _____________ b. This technique is called ____________ & ______________ c. Supposing more of the geese found in the trap had the mark, would the estimated number of geese in the area be greater or lesser? _____ Chart 5: Mushroom Plots Another ecologist uses a different method to estimate the number of mushrooms in a forest. She plots a 10x10 area and randomly chooses 5 spots, where she counts the number of mushrooms in the plots and records them on the grid. a.Calculate the number of mushrooms in the forest based on the grid data: _________________ b. Thie technique is called _______________ Year Geese Trapped Number with Mark 1980 10 1 1981 15 1 1982 12 1 1983 8 0 1984 5 2 1985 10 1 Chart 6: Snakes & Mice Mice born Mice died 1960 2 1000 200 1970 10 800 300 1980 30 400 500 1990 15 600 550 2000 14 620 600 2001 15 640 580 Year The data shows populations of snake and mice found in an experimental field. a. During which year was the mouse population at zero population growth? ______ b. What is the carrying capacity for snakes ? ______ c. What is the carrying capacity for mice? _____ d. What is the rate of growth (r) for mice during 1970? _____ Snakes During 1980? ______ STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers when you finish Part 2) Deer: Predation or Starvation Introduction: In 1970 the deer population of an island forest reserve about 518 square kilometers in size was about 2000 animals. Although the island had excellent vegetation for feeding, the food supply obviously had limits. Thus the forest management personnel feared that overgrazing might lead to mass starvation. Since the area was too remote for hunters, the wildlife seervice decided to bring in natural predators to control the deer population. It was hoped that natural predation would keep the deer population from becoming too large and also increase the deer quality (or health), as predators often eliminate the weaker members of the herd. In 1971, ten wolves were flown into the island. The results of this program are shown in the following table. The Population Change is the number of deer born minus the number of deer that died during that year. Fill out the last column for each year (the first has been calculated for you). Year Wolf Population Deer Population Deer Offspring Predation Starvation Deer Population Change 1971 10 2,000 800 400 100 +300 1972 12 2,300 920 480 240 1973 16 2,500 1,000 640 500 1974 22 2,360 944 880 180 1975 28 2,224 996 1,120 26 1976 24 2,094 836 960 2 1977 21 1,968 788 840 0 1978 18 1,916 766 720 0 1979 19 1,952 780 760 0 1980 19 1,972 790 760 0 1. Graph the deer and wolf populations on the graph below. Use one color to show deer populations and another color to show wolf populations. STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your graph before moving on Analysis 1. Describe what happened to the deer and wolf populations between 1971 and 1980. 2. What do you think would have happened to the deer on the island had wolves NOT been introduced? 3. Most biology textbooks describe that predators and prey exist in a balance. This "balance of nature" hypothesis has been criticized by some scientists because it suggests a relationship between predators and prey that is good and necessary. Opponents of this hypothesis propose the following questions: Why is death by predators more natural or "right" then death by starvation? How does one determine when an ecosystem is in "balance"? Do predators really kill only the old and sick prey? What evidence is there for this statement? What is your opinion of the balance of nature hypothesis? Would the deer on the island be better off, worse off, or about the same without the wolves. Defend your position. ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers when you finish Part 3: The Lesson of the Kaibab Introduction: The environment may be altered by forces within the biotic community, as well as by relationships between organisms and the physical environment. The carrying capacity of an ecosystem is the maximum number of organisms that an area can support on a sustained basis. The density of a population may produce such profound changes in the environment that the environment becomes unsuitable for the survival of that species. For instance, overgrazing of land may make the land unable to support the grazing of animals that lived there. Objectives: Graph data on the Kaibab deer population of Arizona from 1905 to 1939 Determine factors responsible for the changing populations Determine the carrying capacity of the Kaibab Plateau Background Before 1905, the deer on the Kaibab Plateau were estimated to number about 4000. The average carrying capacity of the range was then estimated to be about 30,000 deer. On November 28th, 1906, President Theodore Roosevelt created the Grand Canyon National Game Preserve to protect the "finest deer herd in America." Unfortunately, by this time the Kaibab forest area had already been overgrazed by sheep, cattle, and horses. Most of the tall grasses had been eliminated. The first step to protect the deer was to ban all hunting. In addition, in 1907, The Forest Service tried to exterminate the predators of the deer. Between 1907 and 1939, 816 mountain lions, 20 wolves, 7388 coyotes and more than 500 bobcats were killed. Signs that the deer population was out of control began to appear as early as 1920 - the range was beginning to deteriorate rapidly. The Forest Service reduced the number of livestock grazing permits. By 1923, the deer were reported to be on the verge of starvation and the range conditions were described as "deplorable." The Kaibab Deer Investigating Committee recommended that all livestock not owned by local residents be removed immediately from the range and that the number of deer be cut in half as quickly as possible. Hunting was reopened, and during the fall of 1924, 675 deer were killed by hunters. However, these deer represented only one-tenth the number of deer that had been born that spring. Over the next two winters, it is estimated that 60,000 deer starved to death. Today, the Arizona Game Commission carefully manages the Kaibab area with regulations geared to specific local needs. Hunting permits are issued to keep the deer in balance with their range. Predators are protected to help keep herds in balance with food supplies. Tragic winter losses can be checked by keeping the number of deer near the carrying capacity of the range. Data Table DATA 1. Graph the deer population data. Year Deer Population 1905 4,000 1910 9,000 1915 25,000 1920 65,000 1924 100,000 1925 60,000 1926 40,000 1927 37,000 1928 35,000 1929 30,000 1930 25,000 1931 20,000 1935 18,000 1939 10,000 STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your graph before moving on Analysis 1. During 1906 and 1907, what two methods did the Forest Service use to protect the Kaibab deer? 2. Were these methods successful? Use the data from your graph to support your answer. 3. Why do you suppose the population of deer declined in 1925, although the eliminated of predators occurred? 4. Why do you think the deer population size in 1900 was 4,000 when it is estimated that the plateau has a carrying capacity of 30,000? 5. Why did the deer population decline after 1924? 6. Based on these lessons, suggest what YOU would have done in the following years to manage deer herds. 1915: 1923: 7. It is a criticism of many population ecologists that the pattern of population increase and subsequent crash of the deer population would have occurred even if the bounty had not been placed on the predators. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Explain your reasoning. 8. What future management plans would you suggest for the Kaibab deer herd? STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers when you finish Part 4: More Graphing Bacteria Bacteria reproduce by splitting in half. It takes about 20 minutes, under ideal conditions, for a bacteria population to double. Fill in the table below and then graph your data on the graph paper at right. Time (min) 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 # of bacteria 1 2 Analysis Questions 1. Describe what is happening to the population of bacteria. 2. Is the rate of population growth, slowing down, or speeding up? Explain your answer. 3. This growth is under IDEAL situations (plenty of space, plenty of food, no competition or predators). How might your graph look different if the bacteria, for example, ran out of food? Compare your bacterial growth graph to the human population growth graph at left. 4. How are the graphs similar? 5. What is the trend in human population growth? 6. Do you think this growth will be able to continue forever? Why or why not STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers before you move on White Pine White pine became extinct in northern Minnesota during the last period of glaciation, although it remained in southern climates such as Virginia. Once the glaciers began to retreat, the white pine began to expand northward again; it reappeared in northern Minnesota about 9400 years ago, this is year 0 in the graph. Time (years) 0 15 30 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 # of white pine trees 20 23 31 57 92 156 163 98 106 108 107 STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your graph before you move on Analysis Questions 1. What happens to the population growth after 90 years? 2. What happens to the population growth after 120 years? 3. What is the approximate carrying capacity (maximum number of trees it can safely contain) of white pine in this ecosystem? 4. What factors would affect the carrying capacity of white pines? 5. What caused the pine population to grow so much between 0 and 90 years? STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers before you move on Lynxes and Hares Lynxes are a small cat native to North America and Asia that preys mainly on the snowshoe hare. 1. What happens to the lynx population right after the Hare population peaks? 2. What happens to the Hare population right after the Lynx population peaks? 3. What happens to the Hare population when the Lynx population hits bottom? 4. What happens to the Lynx population as the hare population increases? 5. What would happen to the Hare population if the Lynxes were removed from the ecosystem (in both the short term and the long term? 6. How might the presence of Lynxes be good for the hares? Ecological Studies of Wolves and Moose on Isle Royale Isle Royale is the largest island located in Lake Superior. The island is approximately 45 miles in length and 9 miles wide. Isle Royale consists of Isle Royale (main island) and multiple smaller islands. Isle Royale is about 12 miles south of Canada, 20 miles Southeast of Grand Portage, Minnesota and 53 miles north of Copper Harbor, Michigan. Isle Royale National Park was established in 1940, designated a wilderness area in 1976 and an International Biosphere Reserve in 1980. Isle Royale is a remote island, the only mode of transportation available is by boat or seaplane. Moose first arrived at Isle Royale around 1900. The moose population tends to increase in years with mild winters, early spring green-up, abundant winter forage, low wolf numbers and low levels of tick infestation. Wolves first arrived at the island on an ice bridge from Canada in 1940. Disease has also influenced the wolf population. Between 1980 and 1982, the wolf population declined from 50 to 14, due to canine parvovirus. The Isle Royale wolves and moose have been studied since 1959. This Isle Royale wolf-moose study is unique because it entails just a single predator (the wolf) and a single prey (the moose) on a small island with very little human influence. This is the longest continuous study of a predator and its prey. Predator/Prey on Isle Royale Analysis Questions 1. What is the greatest moose population? What year did that occur? 2. What was the wolf population when the moose population the greatest? 3. What would happen to the moose population if the wolf population decreases? 4. What would happen to the wolf population if the moose population decreases? 5. What would happen to the moose population if the wolves were removed from Isle Royale? 6. Describe the pattern between the wolf population in relation to the moose population. 7. Identify a factor, other than moose population, that may influence the wolf population in Isle Royale. 8. Identify two factors, other than the wolf population, that may influence the moose population. 9. Isle Royale has been undeclared as a national park and has been purchased by a large resort conglomerate. Describe some possible positive and negative changes and how they impact on the Isle Royale ecosystem. STOP: Have Mr. Carter check your answers when you finish