1 Supporting Online Material 2 3 Implications of Low Volatility SOA and Gas-Phase Fragmentation Reactions on 4 SOA Loadings, and their Spatial and Temporal Evolution in the Atmosphere 5 6 Manish Shrivastava, 7 Beranek, 1 Rahul A. Zaveri, 1 Jerome Fast 1 8 1 9 2 Imre Consulting, Richland, WA * Corresponding author: ManishKumar.Shrivastava@pnl.gov 1,* Alla Zelenyuk, 1 Dan Imre, 2 Richard Easter, 1 Josef Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 19 20 21 S1.0. Kinetic mass transfer The kinetic mass transfer model described by Koo et al. [2003] is used to compare 22 model predictions of SOA particle evaporation to the laboratory and field measurements 23 of Vaden et al. [2011]. The mass flux of species i (representing a given volatility bin) to 24 particles of size k (Ji,k) is calculated using the equation [Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998] 25 ππ π½π,π = 2πππ ππ π·π π(πΎππ , πΌ)(ππ − ππ,π ππ ) 1 26 27 where Nk and dk are the number and diameter of particles of size k, respectively; Di is the 28 diffusivity of species i; ci is the bulk gas-phase concentration of species i away from the 29 particle surface; ci,keq is the equilibrium concentration of species i at the particle surface,; 30 f(Kn,α) is the correction for non-continuum effects and imperfect accommodation; Knk is 31 the Knudsen number; α is the accommodation coefficient; and ηk is the Kelvin effect 32 correction. 33 34 The quantity ci,keq is calculated assuming absorptive partitioning in a pseudo-ideal solution: ππ ππ,π = π₯π,π ππ∗ 2 35 36 where xi,k is the mole fraction of species i in particles of size k and ci* is the effective 37 saturation concentration of species i (equal to given volatility species). For all species, a 38 molecular weight of 150 g mol-1, density of 1500 kg m-3, diffusion coefficient of 5×10-6 2 39 m2 s-1, and surface tension of 0.05 N m-1 are assumed following Riipinen et al. [2010]. 40 The Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations (LSODES) in FORTRAN is 41 used to solve the mass transfer equations and output instantaneous particle diameters for 42 comparison to experimental data. 43 For evaporation rates shown in Figure 1a of the main text, calculations are 44 performed using a-7-species volatility basis set (VBS) fit from Pathak et al. [2007] for 45 ozonolysis of α-pinene under low NOx conditions in the dark. Initial aerosol mass 46 fractions, defining the initial particle volatility distribution used as input to the kinetic 47 mass transfer code, are shown in Table S1, and are calculated for each lumped species i, 48 assuming οROG=200 ppb and product distributions from the 7-species VBS fits. Particle 49 evaporation rates are calculated as the sum of evaporation rates from all species i as: 50 π πππ = ∑ π½π,π ππ‘ 3 π=1 51 52 where dmk/dt is the instantaneous rate of change of mass of particles of size k. For any 53 given calculation, all particles are assumed to be of the same size. For evaporation 54 calculations in main text Figure 1a, we assume that concentrations of organics in the gas- 55 phase (ci in equation 1) remain zero over the entire modeling period, consistent with the 56 experimental conditions of Vaden et al. [2011]. With this assumption, particles do not 57 interact with each other, the particle evaporation rate does not depend on the total number 58 of particles Nk, and the kinetic mass transfer equation needs only to be solved for the 3 59 particle phase. Figure 1a shows calculations for two values of the mass accommodation 60 coefficient: α=1 and 0.001. A smaller value of α reduces the kinetic evaporation rate of 61 SOA particles. For clarity, other laboratory experiments from Vaden et al. [2011] that are 62 similar to the field data are not shown in main text Figure 1. 63 For the growth calculations shown in main text Figure 1b, we assumed non- 64 volatile SOA and that a constant concentration gradient (ci – cieq) of 1 µg m-3 is always 65 present between the gas and aerosol phases. For non-volatile SOA, cieq is zero, and the 66 constant concentration gradient transforms to a single species bulk gas-phase 67 concentration (ci) of 1 µg m-3. This value of ci corresponds to semi-volatile organic 68 species within the range of the VBS. Figure 1b of the main text shows calculation results 69 for four different values of the mass accommodation coefficient: α=1, 0.1, 0.01 and 70 0.001. Similar to the evaporation rate results, a smaller value of α reduces the growth rate 71 of SOA. 72 In Figure 1c of the main text, the range of C* for the 5 VBS species (with lumped 73 C* of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µg m-3) was chosen to fit the measured evaporation rate 74 of laboratory-generated pure α-pinene SOA and ambient particles as follows. First, a re- 75 arrangement of equations 1 and 3 above, gives an expression for the instantaneous 76 average vapor pressure at the particle surface (C*inst) from the measured rate of change of 77 particle diameter (ddp/dt) (ms-1): ∗ πΆπππ π‘ =− πππ 1 ∗ ππ‘ 4π·π π(πΎππ , πΌ)/(ππ ο²π ) 4 78 4 79 , where ο²p is the particle density (assumed to be 1000 kg m-3) and all other terms are as 80 defined previously. Here the gas-phase concentration away from the particle surface is set 81 to zero, corresponding to conditions in the evaporation chamber. Using equation 4, data 82 from both laboratory and ambient measurements, and two α values of 1 and 0.05 [Pierce 83 et al., 2011; Riipinen et al., 2010], we then calculate the minimum and maximum C*inst 84 as 1.85 *10-3 οg m-3 and 2.39 οg m-3, respectively. Note that α values lower than 0.01 85 resulted in almost no SOA growth shown in Figure 1b in the main text, and are most 86 likely unrealistic. Our 5 components with lumped C* of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µg m-3 87 include the minimum and maximum C*inst for both laboratory and ambient datasets, and 88 are thus appropriate for this study. 89 S2.0 Reactions in WRF-Chem 90 The equations governing oxidation of S/IVOC precursors through 91 functionalization reactions (Fn) are written within the KPP module of WRF-Chem, and 92 were previously described by Shrivastava et al. [2011]. In this work, we also track the 93 generation number of species to treat fragmentation as shown in Figure S1. The 94 corresponding equations used for the VBS species undergoing only functionalization 95 reactions (i.e., all generations in the Fn approach and just the first 2 generations in the 96 Frag1 and Frag2 approaches) are: πππ΄(π)π,π + ππ» → 1.15 ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1 5 ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π,π + ππ» → 1.15 ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1 6 97 5 98 where POA(g) represents directly emitted SIVOC organic vapors from anthropogenic or 99 biomass burning sources; SI-SOA(g) represents SOA precursor species formed after 100 photochemical oxidation of POA(g); i denotes any given volatility species except the 101 lowest volatility one; i-1 denotes the species with C* equal to i/10; and n denotes the 102 generation number indicating the number of times a given species has reacted with OH. 103 The generation number n increases by 1 from the left to the right hand side of any 104 equation due to reaction with OH. We assume that 15% by mass is added every 105 generation, corresponding to the addition of 2 oxygen atoms to a C15H32 precursor. All 106 VBS species are assumed to have a molecular weight of 250 g mole-1. 107 For the Frag1 and Frag2 approaches, the 3rd and higher generation species undergo 108 fragmentation reactions in addition to functionalization. Equations (7) and (8) below 109 represent the reactions for 3rd and higher generation (n≥3) for the Frag1 and Frag2 110 approaches, respectively. ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π,π≥3 + ππ» 7 → 0.575 ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1 + 0.4ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π=1,π+1 ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π,π≥3 + ππ» 8 → 0.1725 ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1 + 0.75ππΌ − πππ΄(π)π=1,π+1 111 112 The first term on the right hand side of both equations 7 and 8 denotes functionalization 113 with a 15% increase in mass from added oxygen, while the second term on the right hand 6 114 side denotes fragmentation where 40% and 75%, respectively, of VBS species in each 115 volatility bin are moved to the highest volatility species of C* = 104 οg m-3 (i.e. i=1). 116 S3.0 Reactions in the box model 117 Reactions governing oxidation of S/IVOC precursors in the box model are similar to 118 those implemented in WRF-Chem, but include additional tracers to represent the non- 119 oxygen and oxygen parts of each VBS species to allow simulating the O:C ratio of SOA, 120 as described by Shrivastava et al. [2011]. Box-model-simulated O:C ratios are shown in 121 Figure 3 of the main text and in Figure S6 for the 7-species and 4-species VBS, 122 respectively. The ratios were calculated by splitting each VBS species shown in Figure 123 S1 into its oxygen (O) and non-oxygen (C,H,N) parts and repeating the multi- 124 dimensional representation shown in Figure S1 for non-oxygen and oxygen parts 125 separately in the box model. The equations governing this process for VBS species 126 undergoing only functionalization reactions (all generations in Fn and just the first 2 127 generations in the Frag1 and Frag2 approaches) are: πππΆ(π)π,π,π + ππ» → π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π + 0.15π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π 9 πππΆ(π)π,π,π + ππ» → π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π 10 π − πππ΄(π)π,π,π + ππ» → π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π + 0.15π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π 11 π − πππ΄(π)π,π,π + ππ» → π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π 12 128 129 where VOC(g) represents the “initial” oxidation products derived from the smog chamber 130 yields; the additional subscripts c and o represent the non-oxygen and oxygen parts of the 7 131 VOC species, respectively; and V-SOA(g) represents SOA precursor species formed after 132 the photochemical oxidation of VOC(g). The non-oxygen component of the “initial” 133 oxidation products are derived from the assumed “initial” O:C ratio of 0.2. The sum of 134 non-oxygen and oxygen parts equals the total VOC(g) concentrations, thus conserving 135 mass. The “initial” O:C ratio of 0.2 is similar to that of first generation alpha-pinene 136 ozonolysis products [Jimenez et al., 2009]. As shown by equations (9) and (11), oxidation 137 of the non-oxygen part of SOA precursor i results in formation of non-oxygen, and 138 oxygen parts (15% by mass due to 2 oxygen atoms added) of V-SOA with successive 139 lower volatility i-1. Equations (10) and (12) account for movement of the oxygen part of 140 each VBS species to lower volatility, similar to the non-oxygen part, to satisfy mass 141 conservation. 142 For the Frag1 and Frag2 approaches, 3rd and higher generation species undergo 143 fragmentation reactions in addition to functionalization. Reactions 13 and 14 represent 144 the movement of non-oxygen and oxygen species, respectively, for the Frag1 approach. π − πππ΄(π)π,π≥3,π + ππ» → 0.5 π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π + 0.075 π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π 13 + 0.4π − πππ΄(π)π=1,π+1,π π − πππ΄(π)π,π≥3,π + ππ» 14 → 0.5 π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π + 0.4π − πππ΄(π)π=1,π+1,π 145 8 146 The first 2 terms on the right hand side of equation 13 represent functionalization 147 reactions in the VBS for n≥3 of each non-oxygen-containing causing formation of 50% 148 non-oxygen species and 15% of oxygen species of successively lower volatility. The 149 third term represents fragmentation leading to 40% of the non-oxygen part being assigned 150 to the highest volatility species with C* = 104 οg m-3 (i.e., i=1). Equation 14 represents 151 movement of the n≥3 oxygen parts similar to the n≥3 non-oxygen-containing partts, i.e. 152 50% of the oxygen part moves to successively lower volatility, while 40% moves to the 153 highest volatility bin where C* = 104 οg m-3 (i.e., i=1). 154 Similarly, equations 15 and 16 represent the movement of non-oxygen-containing and 155 oxygen-containing species for the Frag2 approach. π − πππ΄(π)π,π,π≥3,π + ππ» → 0.15 π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π + 0.0225 π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π 15 + 0.75π − πππ΄(π)π=1,π+1,π π − πππ΄(π)π,π≥3,π + ππ» 16 → 0.15 π − πππ΄(π)π−1,π+1,π + 0.75π − πππ΄(π)π=1,π+1,π 156 157 Thus after every generation of oxidation, both the non-oxygen and oxygen parts of each 158 VBS species functionalize and fragment, moving to either the lower or the highest 159 volatility species respectively, thus satisfying mass conservation. 160 S4.0 Comparing 7-species and 4-species VBS 9 161 In section 3.2 of the main text, using an initial volatility distribution based on the 162 7-species VBS fits from Pathak et al. [2007] (low NOx, dark, low RH), we demonstrated 163 how details of aging parameterization, background OA concentrations, and treatment of 164 SOA as SVSOA or NVSOA affect the evolution of SOA and the O/C ratio. However, 165 because of the limited range of experimental conditions in Pathak et al. [2007], the yield 166 of the highest C* species (104 µg m-3) is not constrained by measurements. Donahue et al. 167 [2012] suggested recently that gas-phase OH reactions with semi-volatile SOA vapors 168 enhance SOA concentrations by a factor of 2-4 and that the volatility distribution of 1st 169 generation α-pinene ozonolysis products is comprised of a pool of organics whose C* are 170 104 to 106 οg m-3, which serve as precursor for SOA formation during aging. In our 171 simulations, the stoichiometric yield coefficient αi for species with C* of 104 µg m-3 is 172 1.64 times the sum of corresponding yield coefficients αi for species with C* = 0.01 to 173 103 µg m-3 for the 7-species VBS in Pathak et al. [2007], which by comparison to 174 Donahue et al. [2012] is reasonable. There is clearly need for more robust 175 experimentally-based parameterizations; nevertheless, the point of this study is to 176 investigate the differences in predicted SOA loadings and O/C ratio as we introduce 177 approaches involving fragmentation and non-volatile SOA. 178 In this section, we investigate the sensitivity of the model to yield of the highest 179 C* species (104 µg m-3) by comparing results from 7-species VBS with the 4-species VBS 180 fits from Pathak et al. [2007]. Note that the 4-species VBS fit in Pathak et al. [2007] only 181 covers the C* range from 1-1000 µg m-3; thus, there is zero yield for C* = 104 µg m-3. 182 Because the 4-species VBS does not include a C* = 104 µg m-3 species, we added it to the 10 183 4-species VBS, but assigned a zero initial yield to be consistent with Pathak et al. [2007]. 184 Addition of this species facilitates the movement of fragmented material from the lower 185 volatility species, similar to the 7-species VBS formulation. Note that due to its high 186 volatility this species does not affect SOA partitioning. 187 Figure S5 shows the gas-particle distribution for the FnSVSOA and FnNVSOA 188 approaches after 2 hours, 4 hours and 8 hours of simulation time. Figure S5a and S5b 189 show that gas phase concentrations are higher in FnNVSOA compared to FnSVSOA after 190 2 hours of aging, while S5e and S5f show lower gas phase concentrations in FnNVSOA 191 compared to FnSVSOA due to the combined effects of gas phase functionalization 192 reactions and likely particle phase processes. Importantly, Figure S5 shows that 193 calculated SOA loadings in the FnNVSOA and the FnSVSOA simulations are nearly the 194 same throughout the simulation (also evident from Figure S6b). 195 Figure S6 shows the temporal evolution of SOA concentration and O:C ratios for 196 the 4-species VBS. In the “non-aging SIVOC” parameterization (Figure S6a) the 197 RevNVSOA configuration produces no SOA, because the initial volatility distribution of 198 SOA is high than the 7-species VBS. In the “aging SIVOC” parameterizations, the 199 calculated peak SOA loadings in the Fn and Frag1 configurations are factor of 2.2 and 200 1.4 lower, respectively, compared with corresponding 7-species VBS calculated SOA 201 loadings presented in the main paper. In contrast, the calculated peak SOA loadings in the 202 Frag2 configurations using 4 or 7-species VBS (Figures S6d and 3d) yield nearly the 203 same results. Similarly, the calculated O:C ratios using the two VBS representations are 204 comparable. 11 205 In summary, the absolute SOA loadings are sensitive to the mass in the C* of 104 206 οg m-3 species, but the relative differences between model configurations show similar 207 trends varying with fragmentation and volatility in both the 7-species and the 4-species 208 VBS. 209 210 S5.0 Effect of initial precursor concentration 211 So far all our box model simulations using both 4-species and 7-species VBS used 212 οROG = 2 ppbv. Here, we investigate the behavior under increased precursor 213 concentration. Figure S7 shows box model results with the 7-species VBS using οROG = 214 50 ppbv at a constant background OA of 0.5 µg m-3. 215 The non-aging SIVOC (Figure S7a) produces much higher peak SOA loadings as 216 compared to the corresponding results for οROG = 2 ppbv (Figure 3a in the main text) 217 and the large difference between SVSOA and NVSOA seen in the main text Figure 3a 218 are significantly reduced. In addition, the aging configurations (Fn, Frag1 and Frag2) 219 produce only a factor of 2 higher SOA loading compared to the non-aging configuration 220 during the first day (e.g., compare Figure S7b with Figure S7a). In comparison, at οROG 221 = 2 ppbv, the aging configurations increased SOA loadings by 1-2 orders of magnitude 222 (Figure 3b versus Figure 3a in main text). Figures S7b to S7d show that the O:C ratio 223 increases with aging in both the SVSOA and NVSOA approaches, consistent with Figure 224 3. In addition, Figure S7e shows the NVSOA to SVSOA ratio rapidly approaches 1 early 225 in the day. In the non-aging case (orange line in Figure S7e), this ratio continuously 226 increases as SVSOA evaporates due to dilution and because there is no additional SOA 12 227 formation beyond the fixed yields. In the aging cases the ratio remains close to 1 228 throughout the 3 day simulation. 229 S6.0 Temperature effects 230 The effect of temperature on C* is given by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation, 231 parameterized by the enthalpy of vaporization οHv. In this study, we select οHv values 232 varying with C* as described by Donahue et al. [2006]. Figure S8a illustrates the effect of 233 temperature on SOA formation and evolution for the Frag1 approach, with constant 234 background OA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3. Peak SOA concentrations increase by a 235 factor of 3 as temperature is reduced from 313 K to 273 K in both the SVSOA (dashed 236 lines) and NVSOA (solid lines) approaches, because of the reduction in C* with 237 temperature. Some of the differences in SOA loadings are also due to higher OH 238 concentrations at higher temperatures simulated by the gas-phase chemistry mechanism 239 in the box model, but this impact is secondary to the effect of reducing C* on SOA 240 formation. Figure S8b demonstrates that with time, dilution plays a more important role 241 and the SVSOA evaporates while the NVSOA does not. 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 13 249 Table S1. Initial aerosol mass fractions (AMF) in each volatility bin corresponding to the 250 7-species VBS stoichiometric coefficients in Pathak et al. [2007]. These values were 251 used as inputs to the kinetic mass transfer code. Parameter C* at 298 K Lumped species 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 7-species VBS AMF 0.003 0.038 0.118 0.274 0.251 0.222 0.094 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 14 270 271 272 273 Table S2: Initial conditions for gas phase species in box model simulations implementing the CBM-Z photochemical mechanism as defined in Zaveri et al. [1999]. Other variables used for model initialization (chemistry and photolysis) include relative humidity (RH) = 85% and latitude = 40 ο°N. The model simulates a day in the month of March. Species Mixing ratio (ppb) H2SO4 1 HNO3 0.2 HCl 0.1 NH3 1.2 NO 2 NO2 5 O3 60 H2O2 1 CO 70 SO2 1 CH4 1800 HCHO 2 PAN 1 PAR 50 OLET 1 OLEI 1 TOL 2 XYL 2 API 2 LIM 2 274 275 15 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 Figure S1: Schematic illustrating the assumed gas phase oxidation reactions of VBS species with OH as discussed in the text. The generation number indicates the number of times a given species has reacted with OH. Since generations 3 and higher undergo the same functionalization and fragmentation reactions, they are lumped together to simplify their representation in models. Fragmentation reactions are assumed to move 40% or 75% of the mass of each VBS species to the highest volatility species (C* of 104 οg m-3), while 10% of the mass of each VBS species is lost to highly volatile organic species outside the VBS range. 288 289 290 291 16 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 Figure S2: Box model simulations showing the temporal evolution of SOA concentrations using the 7-species VBS fits from Pathak et al. (2007) with οROG = 2 ppbv. Results are presented as dilution-corrected SOA concentrations above background. DF represents the dilution factor, calculated as the ratio of the concentration of a non-volatile non-reactive tracer species before dilution to its concentration after dilution. Atmospheric SOA evolution compares traditional absorptive partitioning SVSOA (blue line) to our revised approach with formation of NVSOA (red line). (a) “Non-aging SIVOC” parameterization. (b), (c) and (d) “Aging SIVOC” parameterizations as defined in main text Table 1 for the Fn, Frag1, and Frag2 approaches. e) dilution factor and OH concentrations. The solid and dashed lines in (a-d) denote simulations assuming background SOA concentrations of 0.5 µg m-3 and 0.1 µg m-3, respectively. 308 17 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 Figure S3: SOA volatility distribution (excluding background OA) after 24 hours for (a) TradSVSOA, (b) FnSVSOA, (c) Frag1SVSOA, and (d) Frag2SVSOA configurations at background SOA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3 with οROG = 2 ppbv. See main text Table 1 for configuration definitions. Species are distributed according to their effective saturation concentration (C*, οg m-3), presented as a logarithmically-distributed volatility basis set. Also indicated are total gas and particle phase concentrations calculated as sum of all volatility species. 321 322 323 324 18 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 Figure S4: Box model simulations of the SOA volatility distribution (excluding background OA) after 24 hours for (a) TradNVSOA, (b) FnNVSOA, (c) Frag1NVSOA, and (d) Frag2NVSOA configurations at a background SOA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3 with οROG = 2 ppbv. See main text Table 1 for configuration definitions. Species are distributed according to their effective saturation concentration (C*, οg m-3), presented as a logarithmically-distributed volatility basis set. Also indicated are total gas and particle phase concentrations calculated as sum of all volatility species. 336 337 338 339 340 19 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 Figure S5: Box model evolution of SOA volatility distributions due to dilution and OH oxidation for (a), (c), (e) FnSVSOA and (b), (d), (e) FnNVSOA after 2, 4 and 8 hours, respectively, with οROG = 2 ppbv. Panels (a) and (b) show that gas phase concentrations are higher in the FnNVSOA configuration compared to the FnSVSOA configuration after 2 hours of aging, while panels (e) and (f) show lower gas phase concentrations in FnNVSOA compared to FnSVSOA due to the combined effects of gas phase functionalization reactions and likely particle phase processes continuously moving material to the non-volatile species. See main text and supplemental material for more details. 354 355 356 20 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 Figure S6. Box model calculations showing the temporal evolution of absolute SOA concentrations above background (bkg), using the 4-species VBS from Pathak et al. [2007] as described in the text with οROG = 2 ppbv. Atmospheric SOA evolution compares traditional absorptive partitioning SVSOA (blue line) to our revised approach with formation of NVSOA (red line). (a) “Non-aging SIVOC” parameterization. (b), (c) and (d) “Aging SIVOC” parameterization as defined in main text Table 1. (e) ratio of NVSOA to SVSOA approaches for the Fn, Frag1 and Frag2 configurations as defined in main text Table 1. f) dilution factor and OH concentrations. The solid and dashed lines in (a-e) denote calculations assuming background SOA concentrations of 0.5 µg m-3, and 0.1 µg m-3, respectively. The black and green lines in (a), (b), (c) and (d) denote O:C ratios (right-hand vertical axis) for the SVSOA and NVSOA approaches respectively. 372 373 21 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 Figure S7. Box model calculations showing the temporal evolution of absolute SOA concentrations above background (bkg), using the 7-species VBS from Pathak et al. [2007]. This figure is similar to Figure 3 in the main text except that it is initialized with a higher οROG concentration of 50 ppbv. All results are based on a constant background concentration of 0.5 οg m-3. (a) “Non-aging SIVOC” parameterization. (b) Fn, (c) Frag1 and (d) Frag2 configurations using the “aging SIVOC” parameterization as defined in main text Table 1. (e) ratio of NVSOA to SVSOA approaches for Fn, Frag1 and Frag2 configurations, defined in main text Table 1. The blue and red lines denote SVSOA and NVSOA loadings, while the black and green lines denote O:C ratios for the SVSOA and NVSOA approaches, respectively. 385 386 387 388 22 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 Figure S8: Effects of temperature on the temporal evolution of absolute SOA concentrations (above background) for the Frag1 configuration assuming a constant background SOA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3 at οROG = 2 ppbv. The dashed and solid lines represent SVSOA and NVSOA approaches, respectively, for temperatures of 273 K (black), 298 K (blue) and 313 K (green). 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 23 405 406 S7.0 References 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 Donahue, N. M., et al. (2012), Aging of biogenic secondary organic aerosol via gas-phase OH radical reactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109(34), 13503-13508, doi:10.1073/pnas.1115186109. Donahue, N. M., A. L. Robinson, C. O. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis (2006), Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(8), 02635-02643, doi:10.1021/es052297c. Jimenez, J. L., et al. (2009), Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science, 326(5959), 1525-1529, doi:10.1126/science.1180353. Koo, B. Y., A. S. Ansari, and S. N. Pandis (2003), Integrated approaches to modeling the organic and inorganic atmospheric aerosol components, Atmospheric Environment, 37(34), 4757-4768, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.016. Pathak, R. K., A. A. Presto, T. E. Lane, C. O. Stanier, N. M. Donahue, and S. N. Pandis (2007), Ozonolysis of alpha-pinene: parameterization of secondary organic aerosol mass fraction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7(14), 3811-3821. Pierce, J. R., I. Riipinen, M. Kulmala, M. Ehn, T. Petaja, H. Junninen, D. R. Worsnop, and N. M. Donahue (2011), Quantification of the volatility of secondary organic compounds in ultrafine particles during nucleation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 90199036. Riipinen, I., J. R. Pierce, N. M. Donahue, and S. N. Pandis (2010), Equilibration time scales of organic aerosol inside thermodenuders: Evaporation kinetics versus thermodynamics, Atmospheric Environment, 44(5), 597-607, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.022. Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis (1998), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air Pollution to Climate Change, 1326 pp., Wiley, New York. Shrivastava, M., J. Fast, R. Easter, W. I. Gustafson Jr., R. A. Zaveri, J. L. Jimenez, P. Saide, and A. Hodzic (2011), Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: comparison of simple and complex representations of the volatility basis set approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11(13), 6639-6662. Vaden, T. D., D. Imre, J. Beranek, M. Shrivastava, and A. Zelenyuk (2011), Evaporation kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic aerosol, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2190-2195, doi:doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013391108. Zaveri, R. A., and L. K. Peters (1999), A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for large-scale applications, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 104(D23), 30387-30415. 24