SuppInfo

advertisement
1
Supporting Online Material
2
3
Implications of Low Volatility SOA and Gas-Phase Fragmentation Reactions on
4
SOA Loadings, and their Spatial and Temporal Evolution in the Atmosphere
5
6
Manish Shrivastava,
7
Beranek, 1 Rahul A. Zaveri, 1 Jerome Fast 1
8
1
9
2
Imre Consulting, Richland, WA
*
Corresponding author: ManishKumar.Shrivastava@pnl.gov
1,*
Alla Zelenyuk,
1
Dan Imre,
2
Richard Easter,
1
Josef
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
1
19
20
21
S1.0. Kinetic mass transfer
The kinetic mass transfer model described by Koo et al. [2003] is used to compare
22
model predictions of SOA particle evaporation to the laboratory and field measurements
23
of Vaden et al. [2011]. The mass flux of species i (representing a given volatility bin) to
24
particles of size k (Ji,k) is calculated using the equation [Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998]
25
π‘’π‘ž
𝐽𝑖,π‘˜ = 2πœ‹π‘π‘˜ π‘‘π‘˜ 𝐷𝑖 𝑓(πΎπ‘›π‘˜ , 𝛼)(𝑐𝑖 − 𝑐𝑖,π‘˜
πœ‚π‘˜ )
1
26
27
where Nk and dk are the number and diameter of particles of size k, respectively; Di is the
28
diffusivity of species i; ci is the bulk gas-phase concentration of species i away from the
29
particle surface; ci,keq is the equilibrium concentration of species i at the particle surface,;
30
f(Kn,α) is the correction for non-continuum effects and imperfect accommodation; Knk is
31
the Knudsen number; α is the accommodation coefficient; and ηk is the Kelvin effect
32
correction.
33
34
The quantity ci,keq is calculated assuming absorptive partitioning in a pseudo-ideal
solution:
π‘’π‘ž
𝑐𝑖,π‘˜
= π‘₯𝑖,π‘˜ 𝑐𝑖∗
2
35
36
where xi,k is the mole fraction of species i in particles of size k and ci* is the effective
37
saturation concentration of species i (equal to given volatility species). For all species, a
38
molecular weight of 150 g mol-1, density of 1500 kg m-3, diffusion coefficient of 5×10-6
2
39
m2 s-1, and surface tension of 0.05 N m-1 are assumed following Riipinen et al. [2010].
40
The Livermore Solver for Ordinary Differential Equations (LSODES) in FORTRAN is
41
used to solve the mass transfer equations and output instantaneous particle diameters for
42
comparison to experimental data.
43
For evaporation rates shown in Figure 1a of the main text, calculations are
44
performed using a-7-species volatility basis set (VBS) fit from Pathak et al. [2007] for
45
ozonolysis of α-pinene under low NOx conditions in the dark. Initial aerosol mass
46
fractions, defining the initial particle volatility distribution used as input to the kinetic
47
mass transfer code, are shown in Table S1, and are calculated for each lumped species i,
48
assuming ROG=200 ppb and product distributions from the 7-species VBS fits. Particle
49
evaporation rates are calculated as the sum of evaporation rates from all species i as:
50
𝑛
π‘‘π‘šπ‘˜
= ∑ 𝐽𝑖,π‘˜
𝑑𝑑
3
𝑖=1
51
52
where dmk/dt is the instantaneous rate of change of mass of particles of size k. For any
53
given calculation, all particles are assumed to be of the same size. For evaporation
54
calculations in main text Figure 1a, we assume that concentrations of organics in the gas-
55
phase (ci in equation 1) remain zero over the entire modeling period, consistent with the
56
experimental conditions of Vaden et al. [2011]. With this assumption, particles do not
57
interact with each other, the particle evaporation rate does not depend on the total number
58
of particles Nk, and the kinetic mass transfer equation needs only to be solved for the
3
59
particle phase. Figure 1a shows calculations for two values of the mass accommodation
60
coefficient: α=1 and 0.001. A smaller value of α reduces the kinetic evaporation rate of
61
SOA particles. For clarity, other laboratory experiments from Vaden et al. [2011] that are
62
similar to the field data are not shown in main text Figure 1.
63
For the growth calculations shown in main text Figure 1b, we assumed non-
64
volatile SOA and that a constant concentration gradient (ci – cieq) of 1 µg m-3 is always
65
present between the gas and aerosol phases. For non-volatile SOA, cieq is zero, and the
66
constant concentration gradient transforms to a single species bulk gas-phase
67
concentration (ci) of 1 µg m-3. This value of ci corresponds to semi-volatile organic
68
species within the range of the VBS. Figure 1b of the main text shows calculation results
69
for four different values of the mass accommodation coefficient: α=1, 0.1, 0.01 and
70
0.001. Similar to the evaporation rate results, a smaller value of α reduces the growth rate
71
of SOA.
72
In Figure 1c of the main text, the range of C* for the 5 VBS species (with lumped
73
C* of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µg m-3) was chosen to fit the measured evaporation rate
74
of laboratory-generated pure α-pinene SOA and ambient particles as follows. First, a re-
75
arrangement of equations 1 and 3 above, gives an expression for the instantaneous
76
average vapor pressure at the particle surface (C*inst) from the measured rate of change of
77
particle diameter (ddp/dt) (ms-1):
∗
𝐢𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑑
=−
𝑑𝑑𝑝
1
∗
𝑑𝑑 4𝐷𝑖 𝑓(πΎπ‘›π‘˜ , 𝛼)/(𝑑𝑝 𝑝 )
4
78
4
79
, where p is the particle density (assumed to be 1000 kg m-3) and all other terms are as
80
defined previously. Here the gas-phase concentration away from the particle surface is set
81
to zero, corresponding to conditions in the evaporation chamber. Using equation 4, data
82
from both laboratory and ambient measurements, and two α values of 1 and 0.05 [Pierce
83
et al., 2011; Riipinen et al., 2010], we then calculate the minimum and maximum C*inst
84
as 1.85 *10-3 g m-3 and 2.39 g m-3, respectively. Note that α values lower than 0.01
85
resulted in almost no SOA growth shown in Figure 1b in the main text, and are most
86
likely unrealistic. Our 5 components with lumped C* of 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1 and 10 µg m-3
87
include the minimum and maximum C*inst for both laboratory and ambient datasets, and
88
are thus appropriate for this study.
89
S2.0 Reactions in WRF-Chem
90
The
equations
governing
oxidation
of
S/IVOC
precursors
through
91
functionalization reactions (Fn) are written within the KPP module of WRF-Chem, and
92
were previously described by Shrivastava et al. [2011]. In this work, we also track the
93
generation number of species to treat fragmentation as shown in Figure S1. The
94
corresponding equations used for the VBS species undergoing only functionalization
95
reactions (i.e., all generations in the Fn approach and just the first 2 generations in the
96
Frag1 and Frag2 approaches) are:
𝑃𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛 + 𝑂𝐻 → 1.15 𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1
5
𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛 + 𝑂𝐻 → 1.15 𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1
6
97
5
98
where POA(g) represents directly emitted SIVOC organic vapors from anthropogenic or
99
biomass burning sources; SI-SOA(g) represents SOA precursor species formed after
100
photochemical oxidation of POA(g); i denotes any given volatility species except the
101
lowest volatility one; i-1 denotes the species with C* equal to i/10; and n denotes the
102
generation number indicating the number of times a given species has reacted with OH.
103
The generation number n increases by 1 from the left to the right hand side of any
104
equation due to reaction with OH. We assume that 15% by mass is added every
105
generation, corresponding to the addition of 2 oxygen atoms to a C15H32 precursor. All
106
VBS species are assumed to have a molecular weight of 250 g mole-1.
107
For the Frag1 and Frag2 approaches, the 3rd and higher generation species undergo
108
fragmentation reactions in addition to functionalization. Equations (7) and (8) below
109
represent the reactions for 3rd and higher generation (n≥3) for the Frag1 and Frag2
110
approaches, respectively.
𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛≥3 + 𝑂𝐻
7
→ 0.575 𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1 + 0.4𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖=1,𝑛+1
𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛≥3 + 𝑂𝐻
8
→ 0.1725 𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1 + 0.75𝑆𝐼 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖=1,𝑛+1
111
112
The first term on the right hand side of both equations 7 and 8 denotes functionalization
113
with a 15% increase in mass from added oxygen, while the second term on the right hand
6
114
side denotes fragmentation where 40% and 75%, respectively, of VBS species in each
115
volatility bin are moved to the highest volatility species of C* = 104 g m-3 (i.e. i=1).
116
S3.0 Reactions in the box model
117
Reactions governing oxidation of S/IVOC precursors in the box model are similar to
118
those implemented in WRF-Chem, but include additional tracers to represent the non-
119
oxygen and oxygen parts of each VBS species to allow simulating the O:C ratio of SOA,
120
as described by Shrivastava et al. [2011]. Box-model-simulated O:C ratios are shown in
121
Figure 3 of the main text and in Figure S6 for the 7-species and 4-species VBS,
122
respectively. The ratios were calculated by splitting each VBS species shown in Figure
123
S1 into its oxygen (O) and non-oxygen (C,H,N) parts and repeating the multi-
124
dimensional representation shown in Figure S1 for non-oxygen and oxygen parts
125
separately in the box model. The equations governing this process for VBS species
126
undergoing only functionalization reactions (all generations in Fn and just the first 2
127
generations in the Frag1 and Frag2 approaches) are:
𝑉𝑂𝐢(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛,𝑐 + 𝑂𝐻 → 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,𝑐 + 0.15𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
9
𝑉𝑂𝐢(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛,π‘œ + 𝑂𝐻 → 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
10
𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛,𝑐 + 𝑂𝐻 → 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,𝑐 + 0.15𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
11
𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛,π‘œ + 𝑂𝐻 → 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
12
128
129
where VOC(g) represents the “initial” oxidation products derived from the smog chamber
130
yields; the additional subscripts c and o represent the non-oxygen and oxygen parts of the
7
131
VOC species, respectively; and V-SOA(g) represents SOA precursor species formed after
132
the photochemical oxidation of VOC(g). The non-oxygen component of the “initial”
133
oxidation products are derived from the assumed “initial” O:C ratio of 0.2. The sum of
134
non-oxygen and oxygen parts equals the total VOC(g) concentrations, thus conserving
135
mass. The “initial” O:C ratio of 0.2 is similar to that of first generation alpha-pinene
136
ozonolysis products [Jimenez et al., 2009]. As shown by equations (9) and (11), oxidation
137
of the non-oxygen part of SOA precursor i results in formation of non-oxygen, and
138
oxygen parts (15% by mass due to 2 oxygen atoms added) of V-SOA with successive
139
lower volatility i-1. Equations (10) and (12) account for movement of the oxygen part of
140
each VBS species to lower volatility, similar to the non-oxygen part, to satisfy mass
141
conservation.
142
For the Frag1 and Frag2 approaches, 3rd and higher generation species undergo
143
fragmentation reactions in addition to functionalization. Reactions 13 and 14 represent
144
the movement of non-oxygen and oxygen species, respectively, for the Frag1 approach.
𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛≥3,𝑐 + 𝑂𝐻
→ 0.5 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,𝑐 + 0.075 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
13
+ 0.4𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖=1,𝑛+1,𝑐
𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛≥3,π‘œ + 𝑂𝐻
14
→ 0.5 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ + 0.4𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖=1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
145
8
146
The first 2 terms on the right hand side of equation 13 represent functionalization
147
reactions in the VBS for n≥3 of each non-oxygen-containing causing formation of 50%
148
non-oxygen species and 15% of oxygen species of successively lower volatility. The
149
third term represents fragmentation leading to 40% of the non-oxygen part being assigned
150
to the highest volatility species with C* = 104 g m-3 (i.e., i=1). Equation 14 represents
151
movement of the n≥3 oxygen parts similar to the n≥3 non-oxygen-containing partts, i.e.
152
50% of the oxygen part moves to successively lower volatility, while 40% moves to the
153
highest volatility bin where C* = 104 g m-3 (i.e., i=1).
154
Similarly, equations 15 and 16 represent the movement of non-oxygen-containing and
155
oxygen-containing species for the Frag2 approach.
𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑒,𝑛≥3,𝑐 + 𝑂𝐻
→ 0.15 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,𝑐 + 0.0225 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
15
+ 0.75𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖=1,𝑛+1,𝑐
𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖,𝑛≥3,π‘œ + 𝑂𝐻
16
→ 0.15 𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖−1,𝑛+1,π‘œ + 0.75𝑉 − 𝑆𝑂𝐴(𝑔)𝑖=1,𝑛+1,π‘œ
156
157
Thus after every generation of oxidation, both the non-oxygen and oxygen parts of each
158
VBS species functionalize and fragment, moving to either the lower or the highest
159
volatility species respectively, thus satisfying mass conservation.
160
S4.0 Comparing 7-species and 4-species VBS
9
161
In section 3.2 of the main text, using an initial volatility distribution based on the
162
7-species VBS fits from Pathak et al. [2007] (low NOx, dark, low RH), we demonstrated
163
how details of aging parameterization, background OA concentrations, and treatment of
164
SOA as SVSOA or NVSOA affect the evolution of SOA and the O/C ratio. However,
165
because of the limited range of experimental conditions in Pathak et al. [2007], the yield
166
of the highest C* species (104 µg m-3) is not constrained by measurements. Donahue et al.
167
[2012] suggested recently that gas-phase OH reactions with semi-volatile SOA vapors
168
enhance SOA concentrations by a factor of 2-4 and that the volatility distribution of 1st
169
generation α-pinene ozonolysis products is comprised of a pool of organics whose C* are
170
104 to 106 g m-3, which serve as precursor for SOA formation during aging. In our
171
simulations, the stoichiometric yield coefficient αi for species with C* of 104 µg m-3 is
172
1.64 times the sum of corresponding yield coefficients αi for species with C* = 0.01 to
173
103 µg m-3 for the 7-species VBS in Pathak et al. [2007], which by comparison to
174
Donahue et al. [2012] is reasonable. There is clearly need for more robust
175
experimentally-based parameterizations; nevertheless, the point of this study is to
176
investigate the differences in predicted SOA loadings and O/C ratio as we introduce
177
approaches involving fragmentation and non-volatile SOA.
178
In this section, we investigate the sensitivity of the model to yield of the highest
179
C* species (104 µg m-3) by comparing results from 7-species VBS with the 4-species VBS
180
fits from Pathak et al. [2007]. Note that the 4-species VBS fit in Pathak et al. [2007] only
181
covers the C* range from 1-1000 µg m-3; thus, there is zero yield for C* = 104 µg m-3.
182
Because the 4-species VBS does not include a C* = 104 µg m-3 species, we added it to the
10
183
4-species VBS, but assigned a zero initial yield to be consistent with Pathak et al. [2007].
184
Addition of this species facilitates the movement of fragmented material from the lower
185
volatility species, similar to the 7-species VBS formulation. Note that due to its high
186
volatility this species does not affect SOA partitioning.
187
Figure S5 shows the gas-particle distribution for the FnSVSOA and FnNVSOA
188
approaches after 2 hours, 4 hours and 8 hours of simulation time. Figure S5a and S5b
189
show that gas phase concentrations are higher in FnNVSOA compared to FnSVSOA after
190
2 hours of aging, while S5e and S5f show lower gas phase concentrations in FnNVSOA
191
compared to FnSVSOA due to the combined effects of gas phase functionalization
192
reactions and likely particle phase processes. Importantly, Figure S5 shows that
193
calculated SOA loadings in the FnNVSOA and the FnSVSOA simulations are nearly the
194
same throughout the simulation (also evident from Figure S6b).
195
Figure S6 shows the temporal evolution of SOA concentration and O:C ratios for
196
the 4-species VBS. In the “non-aging SIVOC” parameterization (Figure S6a) the
197
RevNVSOA configuration produces no SOA, because the initial volatility distribution of
198
SOA is high than the 7-species VBS. In the “aging SIVOC” parameterizations, the
199
calculated peak SOA loadings in the Fn and Frag1 configurations are factor of 2.2 and
200
1.4 lower, respectively, compared with corresponding 7-species VBS calculated SOA
201
loadings presented in the main paper. In contrast, the calculated peak SOA loadings in the
202
Frag2 configurations using 4 or 7-species VBS (Figures S6d and 3d) yield nearly the
203
same results. Similarly, the calculated O:C ratios using the two VBS representations are
204
comparable.
11
205
In summary, the absolute SOA loadings are sensitive to the mass in the C* of 104
206
g m-3 species, but the relative differences between model configurations show similar
207
trends varying with fragmentation and volatility in both the 7-species and the 4-species
208
VBS.
209
210
S5.0 Effect of initial precursor concentration
211
So far all our box model simulations using both 4-species and 7-species VBS used
212
ROG = 2 ppbv. Here, we investigate the behavior under increased precursor
213
concentration. Figure S7 shows box model results with the 7-species VBS using ROG =
214
50 ppbv at a constant background OA of 0.5 µg m-3.
215
The non-aging SIVOC (Figure S7a) produces much higher peak SOA loadings as
216
compared to the corresponding results for ROG = 2 ppbv (Figure 3a in the main text)
217
and the large difference between SVSOA and NVSOA seen in the main text Figure 3a
218
are significantly reduced. In addition, the aging configurations (Fn, Frag1 and Frag2)
219
produce only a factor of 2 higher SOA loading compared to the non-aging configuration
220
during the first day (e.g., compare Figure S7b with Figure S7a). In comparison, at ROG
221
= 2 ppbv, the aging configurations increased SOA loadings by 1-2 orders of magnitude
222
(Figure 3b versus Figure 3a in main text). Figures S7b to S7d show that the O:C ratio
223
increases with aging in both the SVSOA and NVSOA approaches, consistent with Figure
224
3. In addition, Figure S7e shows the NVSOA to SVSOA ratio rapidly approaches 1 early
225
in the day. In the non-aging case (orange line in Figure S7e), this ratio continuously
226
increases as SVSOA evaporates due to dilution and because there is no additional SOA
12
227
formation beyond the fixed yields. In the aging cases the ratio remains close to 1
228
throughout the 3 day simulation.
229
S6.0 Temperature effects
230
The effect of temperature on C* is given by the Clausius-Clapeyron equation,
231
parameterized by the enthalpy of vaporization Hv. In this study, we select Hv values
232
varying with C* as described by Donahue et al. [2006]. Figure S8a illustrates the effect of
233
temperature on SOA formation and evolution for the Frag1 approach, with constant
234
background OA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3. Peak SOA concentrations increase by a
235
factor of 3 as temperature is reduced from 313 K to 273 K in both the SVSOA (dashed
236
lines) and NVSOA (solid lines) approaches, because of the reduction in C* with
237
temperature. Some of the differences in SOA loadings are also due to higher OH
238
concentrations at higher temperatures simulated by the gas-phase chemistry mechanism
239
in the box model, but this impact is secondary to the effect of reducing C* on SOA
240
formation. Figure S8b demonstrates that with time, dilution plays a more important role
241
and the SVSOA evaporates while the NVSOA does not.
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
13
249
Table S1. Initial aerosol mass fractions (AMF) in each volatility bin corresponding to the
250
7-species VBS stoichiometric coefficients in Pathak et al. [2007]. These values were
251
used as inputs to the kinetic mass transfer code.
Parameter
C* at 298 K
Lumped species
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
103
104
7-species VBS AMF 0.003 0.038 0.118 0.274 0.251 0.222 0.094
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
14
270
271
272
273
Table S2: Initial conditions for gas phase species in box model simulations implementing
the CBM-Z photochemical mechanism as defined in Zaveri et al. [1999]. Other variables
used for model initialization (chemistry and photolysis) include relative humidity (RH) =
85% and latitude = 40 ο‚°N. The model simulates a day in the month of March.
Species
Mixing ratio (ppb)
H2SO4
1
HNO3
0.2
HCl
0.1
NH3
1.2
NO
2
NO2
5
O3
60
H2O2
1
CO
70
SO2
1
CH4
1800
HCHO
2
PAN
1
PAR
50
OLET
1
OLEI
1
TOL
2
XYL
2
API
2
LIM
2
274
275
15
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
Figure S1: Schematic illustrating the assumed gas phase oxidation reactions of
VBS species with OH as discussed in the text. The generation number indicates
the number of times a given species has reacted with OH. Since generations 3 and
higher undergo the same functionalization and fragmentation reactions, they are
lumped together to simplify their representation in models. Fragmentation
reactions are assumed to move 40% or 75% of the mass of each VBS species to
the highest volatility species (C* of 104 g m-3), while 10% of the mass of each
VBS species is lost to highly volatile organic species outside the VBS range.
288
289
290
291
16
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
Figure S2: Box model simulations showing the temporal evolution of SOA
concentrations using the 7-species VBS fits from Pathak et al. (2007) with
ROG = 2 ppbv. Results are presented as dilution-corrected SOA
concentrations above background. DF represents the dilution factor, calculated
as the ratio of the concentration of a non-volatile non-reactive tracer species
before dilution to its concentration after dilution. Atmospheric SOA evolution
compares traditional absorptive partitioning SVSOA (blue line) to our revised
approach with formation of NVSOA (red line). (a) “Non-aging SIVOC”
parameterization. (b), (c) and (d) “Aging SIVOC” parameterizations as defined
in main text Table 1 for the Fn, Frag1, and Frag2 approaches. e) dilution factor
and OH concentrations. The solid and dashed lines in (a-d) denote simulations
assuming background SOA concentrations of 0.5 µg m-3 and 0.1 µg m-3,
respectively.
308
17
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
Figure S3: SOA volatility distribution (excluding background OA) after 24
hours for (a) TradSVSOA, (b) FnSVSOA, (c) Frag1SVSOA, and (d)
Frag2SVSOA configurations at background SOA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3
with ROG = 2 ppbv. See main text Table 1 for configuration definitions.
Species are distributed according to their effective saturation concentration (C*,
g m-3), presented as a logarithmically-distributed volatility basis set. Also
indicated are total gas and particle phase concentrations calculated as sum of
all volatility species.
321
322
323
324
18
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
Figure S4: Box model simulations of the SOA volatility distribution (excluding
background OA) after 24 hours for (a) TradNVSOA, (b) FnNVSOA, (c)
Frag1NVSOA, and (d) Frag2NVSOA configurations at a background SOA
concentration of 0.5 µg m-3 with ROG = 2 ppbv. See main text Table 1 for
configuration definitions. Species are distributed according to their effective
saturation concentration (C*, g m-3), presented as a logarithmically-distributed
volatility basis set. Also indicated are total gas and particle phase concentrations
calculated as sum of all volatility species.
336
337
338
339
340
19
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
Figure S5: Box model evolution of SOA volatility distributions due to dilution
and OH oxidation for (a), (c), (e) FnSVSOA and (b), (d), (e) FnNVSOA after 2, 4
and 8 hours, respectively, with ROG = 2 ppbv. Panels (a) and (b) show that gas
phase concentrations are higher in the FnNVSOA configuration compared to the
FnSVSOA configuration after 2 hours of aging, while panels (e) and (f) show
lower gas phase concentrations in FnNVSOA compared to FnSVSOA due to the
combined effects of gas phase functionalization reactions and likely particle phase
processes continuously moving material to the non-volatile species. See main text
and supplemental material for more details.
354
355
356
20
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
Figure S6. Box model calculations showing the temporal evolution of absolute
SOA concentrations above background (bkg), using the 4-species VBS from
Pathak et al. [2007] as described in the text with ROG = 2 ppbv. Atmospheric
SOA evolution compares traditional absorptive partitioning SVSOA (blue line) to
our revised approach with formation of NVSOA (red line). (a) “Non-aging
SIVOC” parameterization. (b), (c) and (d) “Aging SIVOC” parameterization as
defined in main text Table 1. (e) ratio of NVSOA to SVSOA approaches for the
Fn, Frag1 and Frag2 configurations as defined in main text Table 1. f) dilution
factor and OH concentrations. The solid and dashed lines in (a-e) denote
calculations assuming background SOA concentrations of 0.5 µg m-3, and 0.1 µg
m-3, respectively. The black and green lines in (a), (b), (c) and (d) denote O:C
ratios (right-hand vertical axis) for the SVSOA and NVSOA approaches
respectively.
372
373
21
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
Figure S7. Box model calculations showing the temporal evolution of absolute SOA
concentrations above background (bkg), using the 7-species VBS from Pathak et al.
[2007]. This figure is similar to Figure 3 in the main text except that it is initialized with a
higher ROG concentration of 50 ppbv. All results are based on a constant background
concentration of 0.5 g m-3. (a) “Non-aging SIVOC” parameterization. (b) Fn, (c) Frag1
and (d) Frag2 configurations using the “aging SIVOC” parameterization as defined in
main text Table 1. (e) ratio of NVSOA to SVSOA approaches for Fn, Frag1 and Frag2
configurations, defined in main text Table 1. The blue and red lines denote SVSOA and
NVSOA loadings, while the black and green lines denote O:C ratios for the SVSOA and
NVSOA approaches, respectively.
385
386
387
388
22
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
Figure S8: Effects of temperature on the temporal evolution of absolute SOA
concentrations (above background) for the Frag1 configuration assuming a
constant background SOA concentration of 0.5 µg m-3 at ROG = 2 ppbv. The
dashed and solid lines represent SVSOA and NVSOA approaches, respectively,
for temperatures of 273 K (black), 298 K (blue) and 313 K (green).
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
23
405
406
S7.0 References
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
Donahue, N. M., et al. (2012), Aging of biogenic secondary organic aerosol via gas-phase
OH radical reactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 109(34), 13503-13508,
doi:10.1073/pnas.1115186109.
Donahue, N. M., A. L. Robinson, C. O. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis (2006), Coupled
partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 40(8), 02635-02643, doi:10.1021/es052297c.
Jimenez, J. L., et al. (2009), Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere, Science,
326(5959), 1525-1529, doi:10.1126/science.1180353.
Koo, B. Y., A. S. Ansari, and S. N. Pandis (2003), Integrated approaches to modeling the
organic and inorganic atmospheric aerosol components, Atmospheric Environment,
37(34), 4757-4768, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.08.016.
Pathak, R. K., A. A. Presto, T. E. Lane, C. O. Stanier, N. M. Donahue, and S. N. Pandis
(2007), Ozonolysis of alpha-pinene: parameterization of secondary organic aerosol mass
fraction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7(14), 3811-3821.
Pierce, J. R., I. Riipinen, M. Kulmala, M. Ehn, T. Petaja, H. Junninen, D. R. Worsnop,
and N. M. Donahue (2011), Quantification of the volatility of secondary organic
compounds in ultrafine particles during nucleation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 90199036.
Riipinen, I., J. R. Pierce, N. M. Donahue, and S. N. Pandis (2010), Equilibration time
scales of organic aerosol inside thermodenuders: Evaporation kinetics versus
thermodynamics,
Atmospheric
Environment,
44(5),
597-607,
doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.022.
Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis (1998), Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: from Air
Pollution to Climate Change, 1326 pp., Wiley, New York.
Shrivastava, M., J. Fast, R. Easter, W. I. Gustafson Jr., R. A. Zaveri, J. L. Jimenez, P.
Saide, and A. Hodzic (2011), Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: comparison of
simple and complex representations of the volatility basis set approach, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11(13), 6639-6662.
Vaden, T. D., D. Imre, J. Beranek, M. Shrivastava, and A. Zelenyuk (2011), Evaporation
kinetics and phase of laboratory and ambient secondary organic aerosol, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2190-2195, doi:doi: 10.1073/pnas.1013391108.
Zaveri, R. A., and L. K. Peters (1999), A new lumped structure photochemical
mechanism for large-scale applications, Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres,
104(D23), 30387-30415.
24
Download