1. (a) y 20 10 –2 –1 1 x 2 –10 –20 A1A1A1 N3 A1 N1 Note: Award A1 for the left branch asymptotic to the x-axis and crossing the y-axis, A1 for the right branch approximately the correct shape, A1 for a vertical asymptote at 1 approximately x = . 2 (b) (i) x 2 1 2 (must be an equation) (ii) f ( x ) dx A1 N1 (iii) Valid reason R1 N1 A2 N2 A2 N2 A1A1A1A1 N4 A1 N1 0 eg reference to area undefined or discontinuity Note: GDC reason not acceptable. (c) 1.5 (i) V= (ii) V = 105 1 f x 2 dx (accept 33.3 ) (d) f (x) = 2e2x 1 10(2x 1)2 (e) (i) x = 1.11 (accept (1.11, 7.49)) 1 (ii) (accept 0 k < 7.49) p = 0, q = 7.49 A1A1 N2 [17] Note: Accept exact answers given in terms of . 2. (a) Evidence of using l = r arc AB = 7.85 (m) (b) A1 1 Evidence of using A r 2 θ 2 Area of sector AOB = 58.9 (m2) (c) (M1) N2 (M1) A1 N2 METHOD 1 π6 2 π 3 angle = 30 6 (A1) 6 attempt to find 15 sin height = 15 + 15 sin M1 6 = 22.5 (m) A1 N2 METHOD 2 π angle = 3 60 3 attempt to find 15 cos height = 15 + 15 cos = 22.5 (m) (A1) 3 M1 3 A1 N2 2 (d) (i) h 15 15 cos 4 2 4 (M1) = 25.6 (m) (ii) A1 h(0) = 15 15 cos 0 4 (M1) = 4.39(m) (iii) N2 A1 N2 METHOD 1 Highest point when h = 30 R1 30 = 15 15 cos 2t 4 M1 cos 2t = 1 4 (A1) 3 t = 1.18 accept 8 A1 N2 METHOD 2 h 30 2π Sketch of graph of h Correct maximum indicated t = 1.18 t M2 (A1) A1 N2 METHOD 3 Evidence of setting h(t) = 0 sin 2t 0 4 Justification of maximum M1 (A1) R1 eg reasoning from diagram, first derivative test, second derivative test 3 t = 1.18 accept 8 (e) h(t) = 30 sin 2t (may be seen in part (d)) 4 (f) (i) A1 N2 A1A1 N2 3 h(t) 30 π 2 π t –30 A1A1A1 N3 (M1) A1 N2 (M1) A1 N2 Notes: Award A1 for range 30 to 30, A1 for two zeros. Award A1 for approximate correct sinusoidal shape. (ii) METHOD 1 Maximum on graph of h t = 0.393 METHOD 2 Minimum on graph of h t = 1.96 METHOD 3 Solving h(t) = 0 One or both correct answers (M1) A1 t = 0.393, t = 1.96 N2 [22] 3. (a) evidence of using area of a triangle (M1) 1 eg A 2 2 sin θ 2 A = 2 sin (b) A1 N2 METHOD 1 PÔA = 1 2 2 sin θ (= 2 sin ( )) 2 since sin ( ) = sin then both triangles have the same area area OPA = (A1) A1 R1 AG N0 R3 AG N0 METHOD 2 triangle OPA has the same height and the same base as triangle OPB then both triangles have the same area (c) 1 2 2 2 2 area APB = 2 sin + 2 sin (= 4 sin ) S = area of semicircle area APB (= 2 4 sin ) S = 2( − 2 sin ) area semi-circle = A1 A1 M1 AG N0 4 (d) METHOD 1 attempt to differentiate (M1) ds 4 cos θ dθ setting derivative equal to 0 (M1) eg correct equation A1 eg 4 cos = 0, cos = 0, 4 cos = 0 = 2 A1 N3 EITHER evidence of using second derivative (M1) S() = 4 sin A1 S 4 2 A1 it is a minimum because S 0 2 R1 N0 OR evidence of using first derivative (M1) for < , S () < 0 (may use diagram) 2 A1 for > , S () > 0 (may use diagram) 2 A1 it is a minimum since the derivative goes from negative to positive R1 N0 METHOD 2 2 4 sin is minimum when 4 sin is a maximum 4 sin is a maximum when sin = 1 = (e) 2 S is greatest when 4 sin is smallest (or equivalent) = 0 (or ) R3 (A2) A3 N3 (R1) A1 N2 [18] 4. (a) (i) n=5 (A1) T = 280 1.125 T = 493 (ii) evidence of doubling eg 560 setting up equation eg 280 1.12n = 560, 1.12n = 2 n = 6.116... in the year 2007 A1 N2 (A1) A1 (A1) A1 N3 5 (b) (i) 2560000 10 90 e 0.15 (A1) P = 39 635.993... (A1) P P = 39 636 (ii) (c) (i) A1 N3 P = 46 806.997... not doubled valid reason for their answer eg P < 51200 A1 A1 R1 N0 correct value A2 N2 P e.g. (ii) 2560000 10 90 e 0.17 25600 , 91.4 , 640 : 7 280 setting up an inequality (accept an equation, or reversed inequality) e.g. M1 P 2560000 70 , 70 T 10 90e 0.1n 280 1.12 n finding the value 9.31.... after 10 years (A1) A1 N2 [17] 5. (a) P(F S) = 1 0.14 (= 0.86) (A1) Choosing an appropriate formula (M1) eg P(A B) = P(A) + P(B) P(A B) Correct substitution eg P(F S) = 0.93 0.86 A1 P(F S) = 0.07 Notes: There are several valid approaches. Award (A1)(M1)A1 for relevant working using any appropriate strategy eg formula, Venn Diagram, or table. AG N0 Award no marks for the incorrect solution P(F S) = 1 P(F) + P(S) = 1 0.93 = 0.07 (b) Using conditional probability (M1) P (F S ) eg P(F S) P ( S ) P(F S) = 0.07 0.62 = 0.113 (A1) A1 N3 6 (c) F and S are not independent A1 N1 R1R1 N2 If independent P(F S) = P(F) P(S), 0.07 0.31 0.62 (= 0.1922) R1R1 N2 EITHER If independent P(F S) = P(F), 0.113 0.31 OR (d) Let P(F) = x P(S) = 2P(F) (= 2x) (A1) For independence P(F S) = P(F)P(S) (= 2x2) (R1) Attempt to set up a quadratic equation (M1) eg P(F S) = P(F)P(S) P(F)P(S), 0.86 = x + 2x 2x2 2x2 3x + 0.86 = 0 A2 x = 0.386, x = 1.11 (A1) P(F) = 0.386 (A1) N5 [16] 6. (a) (b) (i) p=2 A1 N1 (ii) q=1 A1 N1 (i) f (x) = 0 2 (M1) 3x =0 x 2 1 x= (2x2 3x 2 = 0) 1 x=2 2 1 , 0 2 (ii) A1 Using V = A1 b a y2dx (limits not required) N2 (M1) 2 0 V= ∫ 1 2 3x 2 2 dx x 1 V = 2.52 (c) (i) Evidence of appropriate method A2 A1 N2 M1 eg Product or quotient rule Correct derivatives of 3x and x2 1 Correct substitution eg A1A1 A1 3 ( x 2 1) (3 x) (2 x) f ′ (x) = ( x 2 1) 2 3x 2 3 6 x 2 ( x 2 1) 2 A1 7 f ′ (x) = ii) 3x 2 3 3( x 2 1) = ( x 2 1) 2 ( x 2 1) 2 AG N0 METHOD 1 Evidence of using f ′(x) = 0 at max/min (M1) 3 (x2 + 1) = 0 (3x2 + 3 = 0) A1 no (real) solution R1 Therefore, no maximum or minimum. AG N0 METHOD 2 Evidence of using f ′(x) = 0 at max/min (M1) Sketch of f ′(x) with good asymptotic behaviour A1 Never crosses the x-axis R1 Therefore, no maximum or minimum. AG N0 METHOD 3 Evidence of using f ′ (x) = 0 at max/min (d) (M1) Evidence of considering the sign of f ′ (x) A1 f ′ (x) is an increasing function (f ′ (x) 0, always) R1 Therefore, no maximum or minimum. AG For using integral Area = (M1) g ( x) dx or 0 a Recognizing that a 0 a 0 f ( x) dx or g ( x) dx f ( x) a 0 dx ( x 1) 3x 2 3 2 2 A2 0 Correct equation a 3x 2 3 0 ( x 2 1) 2 a= 1 2 a= 1 2 A1 a Setting up equation (seen anywhere) eg N0 (M1) A1 3a dx = 2, 2 2 2 0 = 2, 2a2 + 3a 2 = 0 a 1 a=2 A1 N2 [24] 8